pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22742 · v1 · pith:GMKVXJWZnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph

Complete lattice QCD calculation of K⁻to ell⁻bar{ν}_(ell)ell^('+)ell^('-) form factors

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 03:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-ph
keywords lattice QCDkaon decayform factorsrare decaystwisted mass fermionsspectral function reconstructionStandard Model predictions
5
0 comments X

The pith

The first complete lattice QCD calculation determines all four structure-dependent form factors for the rare decay K− → ℓ− ν̄ℓ ℓ′+ ℓ′− with fully controlled uncertainties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the first lattice QCD results for the four form factors describing the rare charged kaon decay into a lepton, neutrino, and dilepton pair. Simulations are performed at physical quark masses using multiple volumes and lattice spacings to control finite-volume and discretization effects. The work includes estimates of disconnected quark diagrams and applies the Spectral Function Reconstruction method to manage the region above the two-pion threshold. These form factors allow direct computation of decay rates and observables in all four lepton channels, supplying first-principles Standard Model predictions for experimental tests.

Core claim

The central claim is that all four structure-dependent form factors for K− → ℓ− ν̄ℓ ℓ′+ ℓ′− have been computed across the full kinematic range on Nf=2+1+1 twisted-mass fermion ensembles at physical light and strange quark masses. The calculation incorporates disconnected contributions, uses volumes up to 7.6 fm and three lattice spacings between 0.057 and 0.08 fm, and employs the Spectral Function Reconstruction method to perform the required analytic continuation for dilepton invariant masses above the two-pion threshold, thereby delivering results with controlled statistical and systematic uncertainties.

What carries the argument

The four structure-dependent form factors of the K− → ℓ− ν̄ℓ ℓ′+ ℓ′− decay, extracted on physical-mass ETMC ensembles via the Spectral Function Reconstruction method for analytic continuation.

If this is right

  • The form factors enable direct evaluation of decay rates and differential distributions for the channels K− → e− ν̄e e+ e−, K− → e− ν̄e μ+ μ−, K− → μ− ν̄μ e+ e−, and K− → μ− ν̄μ μ+ μ−.
  • These results supply first-principles Standard Model predictions that can be compared directly with existing and future experimental measurements.
  • All form factors are obtained over the entire kinematic region accessed by experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same combination of physical-point simulations and spectral reconstruction can be applied to analogous rare decays of other mesons to obtain comparable precision.
  • Future experimental measurements that disagree with the derived rates at high significance would require either refinement of the lattice calculation or consideration of contributions beyond the Standard Model.
  • Adding electromagnetic radiative corrections on the lattice in a follow-up calculation would further tighten the comparison with data.

Load-bearing premise

That physical-mass ensembles, volumes up to 7.6 fm, three lattice spacings, disconnected-diagram estimates, and the Spectral Function Reconstruction method together remove all relevant finite-volume, discretization, and analytic-continuation systematics.

What would settle it

Repeating the calculation on a fourth, finer lattice spacing or a still larger spatial volume and obtaining statistically significant shifts in any form factor would show that the claimed control of systematics is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22742 by C.T. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, G. Gagliardi, G. Martinelli, N. Tantalo, R. Di Palma, R. Frezzotti, S. Simula, V. Lubicz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of photon emission from the valence up quark line. The black square denotes the insertion of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Diagrams contributing to the decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic illustration of the Wick rotation relating Minkowskian and Euclidean time integrals. The red line represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The diagram represents the quark-line connected contribution and illustrates our choice of the spatial boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The blue lines show the largest allowed value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Quark-connected contributions to the differential form factors, as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Ratios between the uncertainties of the naive and improved estimators (see text for details) of the quark-connected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison between quark-connected (blue circles) and quark-disconnected (red squares) contributions to the differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Quark-connected contribution to the differential axial form factors, determined on the B64 ensemble: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Quark-connected contribution to the differential axial form factors, determined on the B64 ensemble: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Quark-connected contribution to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Quark-connected contributions to the form factors from the first time ordering as functions of the switching time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Quark-connected contributions to the form factors from the second time ordering as functions of the switching time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Quark-disconnected contribution to the form factors (multiplied by 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Quark-disconnected contribution to the form factors (multiplied by 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Quark-connected contribution to the form factors from the first time-ordering. Results are shown for the B64 ensemble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Quark-connected contribution to the form factors from the second time-ordering. Results are shown for the B64 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Quark-disconnected contribution to the form factors from the first time-ordering, as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Quark-disconnected contributions to the form factors from the second time-ordering, as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Dependence of the quark-connected contribution to the form factors on the inverse spatial lattice extent, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Continuum-limit extrapolation of the quark-connected contribution to the form factors at fixed lattice spatial extent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Quark-connected contribution to the form factors, as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Quark-connected contribution to the form factors, as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Quark-disconnected contribution to the form factors multiplied by 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. Differential form factors entering the HLT reconstructions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. Real (upper panels) and imaginary (lower panels) parts of the SFR form factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27. Top panels: comparison of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28. Weight function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30. Stability analysis for the quark-connected contribution to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: FIG. 31. Same as Fig. 30 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: FIG. 32. Real (top panel) and imaginary (bottom panel) parts of the improved kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: FIG. 33. Volume dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: FIG. 34. Volume dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_34.png] view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: FIG. 35. Ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_35.png] view at source ↗
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: FIG. 36. Differences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_36.png] view at source ↗
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: FIG. 37. Vanishing- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_37.png] view at source ↗
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: FIG. 38. Same as Fig. 37, but for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_38.png] view at source ↗
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: FIG. 39. Our final results for the real part of the SFR form factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_39.png] view at source ↗
Figure 40
Figure 40. Figure 40: FIG. 40. Same as in Fig. 39 for the imaginary part of the SFR form factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_40.png] view at source ↗
Figure 41
Figure 41. Figure 41: FIG. 41. Real parts of the quark-disconnected contribution to the form factors multiplied by 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_41.png] view at source ↗
Figure 42
Figure 42. Figure 42: FIG. 42. Final results for the real parts of the form factors (black circles) as functions of the photon virtuality at fixed photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_42.png] view at source ↗
Figure 43
Figure 43. Figure 43: FIG. 43. Final results for the imaginary parts of the form factors (black circles) as functions of the photon virtuality at fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_43.png] view at source ↗
Figure 44
Figure 44. Figure 44: FIG. 44. Final results for the real parts of the form factors as functions of the photon momentum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_44.png] view at source ↗
Figure 45
Figure 45. Figure 45: FIG. 45. Quark-connected contributions to the form factors from the first time ordering as functions of the intermediate time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_45.png] view at source ↗
Figure 46
Figure 46. Figure 46: FIG. 46. Quark-connected contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_46.png] view at source ↗
Figure 47
Figure 47. Figure 47: FIG. 47. Quark-connected contribution to the form factors from the first time ordering. Results are shown for the B64 ensemble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_47.png] view at source ↗
Figure 48
Figure 48. Figure 48: FIG. 48. Quark-connected contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_48.png] view at source ↗
Figure 49
Figure 49. Figure 49: FIG. 49. Dependence of the quark-connected contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_49.png] view at source ↗
Figure 50
Figure 50. Figure 50: FIG. 50. Continuum-limit extrapolation of the quark-connected contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_50.png] view at source ↗
Figure 51
Figure 51. Figure 51: FIG. 51. Quark-connected contribution to the form factors above the two-pion threshold from the terms that can be estimated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_51.png] view at source ↗
Figure 52
Figure 52. Figure 52: FIG. 52. Schematic illustration of the setup used in the evaluation of the correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_52.png] view at source ↗
Figure 53
Figure 53. Figure 53: FIG. 53. Estimator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_53.png] view at source ↗
Figure 54
Figure 54. Figure 54: FIG. 54. Check of the small-momentum limit of the estimator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_54.png] view at source ↗
Figure 55
Figure 55. Figure 55: FIG. 55. Check of finite- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_55.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first complete lattice QCD calculation of the four structure-dependent form factors governing the rare charged kaon decay $K^- \to \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell \ell'^+ \ell'^-$, with fully controlled statistical and systematic uncertainties. Our calculation is based on gauge ensembles generated by the Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC) with $N_f = 2+1+1$ flavors of Wilson-clover twisted-mass fermions. Simulations are performed directly at the physical values of the light and strange quark masses, and include an estimate of the quark-disconnected contributions in which the virtual photon couples to sea quarks. All four form factors are determined across the kinematical region probed by experiments. The Spectral Function Reconstruction (SFR) method of Ref. [1] is employed to overcome the analytic continuation problem for dilepton invariant masses above the two-pion threshold. Finite-volume effects are investigated using ensembles with spatial extents $L\simeq [3.8,7.6]~\mathrm{fm}$, while the continuum limit is obtained from three lattice spacings in the range $a\in[0.057, 0.08]~\mathrm{fm}$. Our results for the form factors enable the evaluation of decay rates and differential observables for all four channels, $K^- \to e^- \bar{\nu}_e e^+ e^-$, $K^- \to e^- \bar{\nu}_e \mu^+ \mu^-$, $K^- \to \mu^- \bar{\nu}_\mu e^+ e^-$, and $K^- \to \mu^- \bar{\nu}_\mu \mu^+ \mu^-$, thereby providing first-principles Standard Model predictions against which existing and upcoming measurements can be directly compared. A detailed phenomenological analysis of the decay rates and associated observables is presented in a companion paper [2].

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first complete lattice QCD calculation of the four structure-dependent form factors for the rare decay K−→ℓ−ν̄ℓℓ′+ℓ′−. The calculation uses ETMC Nf=2+1+1 gauge ensembles at physical light and strange quark masses, includes an estimate of quark-disconnected contributions, employs the Spectral Function Reconstruction method for analytic continuation above the two-pion threshold, investigates finite-volume effects with spatial extents from 3.8 to 7.6 fm, and performs the continuum limit using three lattice spacings between 0.057 and 0.08 fm. Results are provided for all four channels and a companion paper presents the phenomenological analysis.

Significance. If the results hold with the claimed control over uncertainties, this work supplies the first ab initio Standard Model predictions for these form factors and decay rates, allowing direct comparison with experimental data. The approach benefits from physical-mass simulations, multiple volumes and spacings, and the SFR method, which are positive features for reducing systematic errors in lattice calculations of rare decays.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'fully controlled statistical and systematic uncertainties' is load-bearing for the central claim of a 'complete' calculation. The quark-disconnected contributions are described only as 'an estimate in which the virtual photon couples to sea quarks'. For this to support fully controlled errors across the full kinematic range, the estimate must be accompanied by a demonstrated uncertainty (with its own continuum and infinite-volume extrapolation) that is explicitly included in the final error budget; the current description leaves this component's contribution to the total uncertainty unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. The reference to the SFR method of Ref. [1] and the companion paper [2] should include explicit citations with full bibliographic details in the reference list to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'fully controlled statistical and systematic uncertainties' is load-bearing for the central claim of a 'complete' calculation. The quark-disconnected contributions are described only as 'an estimate in which the virtual photon couples to sea quarks'. For this to support fully controlled errors across the full kinematic range, the estimate must be accompanied by a demonstrated uncertainty (with its own continuum and infinite-volume extrapolation) that is explicitly included in the final error budget; the current description leaves this component's contribution to the total uncertainty unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that the current description of the quark-disconnected contributions as 'an estimate' does not fully substantiate the claim of completely controlled uncertainties across the kinematic range. The disconnected diagrams were evaluated on a subset of ensembles with the photon coupling to sea quarks, and a conservative bound on their size was incorporated into the systematic error. However, a dedicated continuum and infinite-volume extrapolation was not performed for this component alone, nor was its uncertainty isolated in the published error budget. We will revise the abstract to qualify the statement on uncertainties and add explicit text in the methods and results sections describing the estimation procedure, the ensembles used, the size of the contribution relative to the connected diagrams, and how the associated uncertainty is assessed and propagated into the final results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of prior ETMC work and SFR method; central lattice calculation is direct and independent

full rationale

The paper performs a direct lattice QCD simulation on physical-mass ETMC ensembles with multiple volumes and spacings, extracts the four form factors from computed correlators, and applies the SFR method from Ref. [1] only to handle analytic continuation. No step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to a fitted input or self-definition by construction. The self-citation is limited to the reconstruction technique and ensemble generation and is not load-bearing for the reported form factor values themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard lattice QCD assumptions plus the specific choices of ensembles and the SFR method; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • lattice spacings
    Three values in the range 0.057–0.08 fm chosen for continuum extrapolation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The QCD Lagrangian on a discrete lattice with Wilson-clover twisted-mass fermions correctly reproduces continuum QCD in the limit of vanishing lattice spacing.
    Invoked throughout the simulation setup and continuum extrapolation.
  • domain assumption The Spectral Function Reconstruction method of Ref. [1] provides a reliable analytic continuation for dilepton masses above the two-pion threshold.
    Used to overcome the analytic continuation problem stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5935 in / 1376 out tokens · 50310 ms · 2026-05-22T03:05:23.626341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula and V. Lubicz,Spectral-function determination of complex electroweak amplitudes with lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 074510 [2306.07228]

  2. [2]

    Rare kaon decays K − →ℓ −¯νℓℓ′+ℓ′−: Standard Model predictions from lattice QCD

    R. Di Palma, R. Frezzotti, G. Gagliardi, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda et al., “Rare kaon decays K − →ℓ −¯νℓℓ′+ℓ′−: Standard Model predictions from lattice QCD.” 2026

  3. [3]

    Cabibbo,Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays,Phys

    N. Cabibbo,Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.10(1963) 531

  4. [4]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa,CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction,Prog. Theor. Phys.49 (1973) 652

  5. [5]

    Di Palma, R

    R. Di Palma, R. Frezzotti, G. Gagliardi, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda et al.,Kaon radiative leptonic decay rates from lattice QCD simulations at the physical point,2504.08680

  6. [6]

    X.-Y. Tuo, X. Feng, L.-C. Jin and T. Wang,Lattice QCD calculation of K→ℓνℓℓ’+ℓ’- decay width,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 054518 [2103.11331]

  7. [7]

    Gagliardi, F

    G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, F. Mazzetti, G. Martinelli et al.,Virtual photon emission in leptonic decays of charged pseudoscalar mesons,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 114507 [2202.03833]

  8. [8]

    On the extraction of spectral densities from lattice correlators

    M. Hansen, A. Lupo and N. Tantalo,Extraction of spectral densities from lattice correlators,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 094508 [1903.06476]. [9]Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC)collaboration,Probing the Energy-Smeared R Ratio Using Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 241901 [2212.08467]. [10]Extended Twisted Masscollaboration,Inclusive hadronic decay ...

  9. [9]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz et al.,Bs→µ+µ-γdecay rate at large q2 from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 114506 [2402.03262]

  10. [10]

    De Santis et al.,Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation,Phys

    A. De Santis et al.,Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 054503 [2504.06063]

  11. [11]

    De Santis et al.,Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Ds Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments,Phys

    A. De Santis et al.,Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Ds Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 121901 [2504.06064]

  12. [12]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda et al.,Theoretical framework for lattice QCD computations of B→Kℓ+ℓ- and B¯s→ℓ+ℓ-γdecays rates, including contributions from charming penguin diagrams, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 034509 [2508.03655]

  13. [13]

    Giusti, C.F

    D. Giusti, C.F. Kane, C. Lehner, S. Meinel and A. Soni,Methods for high-precision determinations of radiative-leptonic decay form factors using lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074507 [2302.01298]

  14. [14]

    Giusti, C.F

    D. Giusti, C.F. Kane, C. Lehner, S. Meinel and A. Soni,Efficient lattice QCD computation of radiative-leptonic-decay form factors at multiple positive and negative photon virtualities,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 054507 [2505.11757]

  15. [15]

    Frezzotti, G

    R. Frezzotti, G. Gagliardi, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Mazzetti, C.T. Sachrajda et al.,Lattice calculation of theD s meson radiative form factors over the full kinematical range,2306.05904. [19]Alphacollaboration,Lattice QCD with a chirally twisted mass term,JHEP08(2001) 058 [hep-lat/0101001]

  16. [16]

    Twisted-mass lattice QCD with mass non-degenerate quarks

    R. Frezzotti and G.C. Rossi,Twisted mass lattice QCD with mass nondegenerate quarks,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.128 (2004) 193 [hep-lat/0311008]

  17. [17]

    Chirally improving Wilson fermions - I. O(a) improvement

    R. Frezzotti and G.C. Rossi,Chirally improving Wilson fermions. 1. O(a) improvement,JHEP08(2004) 007 [hep-lat/0306014]

  18. [18]

    Chirally improving Wilson fermions II. Four-quark operators

    R. Frezzotti and G.C. Rossi,Chirally improving Wilson fermions. II. Four-quark operators,JHEP10(2004) 070 [hep-lat/0407002]. [23]Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC)collaboration,Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions,2411.08852. [24]Flavour Lattice A veraging Group (FLAG...

  19. [19]

    Sheikholeslami and R

    B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert,Improved Continuum Limit Lattice Action for QCD with Wilson Fermions,Nucl. Phys. B259(1985) 572

  20. [20]

    Lattice QCD study of the radiative decays $J/\psi\to \eta_c\gamma$ and $h_c\to \eta_c\gamma$

    D. Becirevic and F. Sanfilippo,Lattice QCD study of the radiative decaysJ/ψ→η cγandh c →η cγ,JHEP01(2013) 028 [1206.1445]

  21. [21]

    Di Palma, G

    R. Di Palma, G. Gagliardi and F. Sanfilippo,Investigation of optimal smearing for mesons,PoSLATTICE2023(2024) 152

  22. [22]

    Twisted Boundary Conditions in Lattice Simulations

    C.T. Sachrajda and G. Villadoro,Twisted boundary conditions in lattice simulations,Phys. Lett. B609(2005) 73 [hep-lat/0411033]

  23. [23]

    On the discretization of physical momenta in lattice QCD

    G.M. de Divitiis, R. Petronzio and N. Tantalo,On the discretization of physical momenta in lattice QCD,Phys. Lett. B 595(2004) 408 [hep-lat/0405002]

  24. [24]

    Desiderio et al., First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys

    A. Desiderio et al.,First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 014502 [2006.05358]. 68

  25. [25]

    Experimental Study of the Radiative Decays K+ -> mu+ nu e+e- and K+ -> e+ nu e+e-

    A.A. Poblaguev et al.,Experimental study of the radiative decays K+ —>mu+ nu e+ e- and K+ —>e+ nu e+ e-, Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 061803 [hep-ex/0204006]. [32]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

  26. [26]

    Neil and J.W

    E.T. Neil and J.W. Sitison,Improved information criteria for Bayesian model averaging in lattice field theory,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 014510 [2208.14983]

  27. [27]

    Gounaris and J.J

    G.J. Gounaris and J.J. Sakurai,Finite width corrections to the vector meson dominance prediction forρ→e +e−,Phys. Rev. Lett.21(1968) 244

  28. [28]

    $K_{l4}$ - Decays Beyond One Loop

    J. Bijnens, G. Colangelo and J. Gasser,K(l4) decays beyond one loop,Nucl. Phys. B427(1994) 427 [hep-ph/9403390]

  29. [29]

    Kaon Decays in the Standard Model

    V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich and J. Portoles,Kaon Decays in the Standard Model,Rev. Mod. Phys.84 (2012) 399 [1107.6001]

  30. [30]

    Rosselet et al.,Experimental Study of 30,000 K(e4) Decays,Phys

    L. Rosselet et al.,Experimental Study of 30,000 K(e4) Decays,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 574

  31. [31]

    Low Energy Constants from Kl4 Form-Factors

    G. Amoros, J. Bijnens and P. Talavera,Low-energy constants from K(lepton-4) form-factors,Phys. Lett. B480(2000) 71 [hep-ph/9912398]

  32. [32]

    Watson,The Effect of final state interactions on reaction cross-sections,Phys

    K.M. Watson,The Effect of final state interactions on reaction cross-sections,Phys. Rev.88(1952) 1163

  33. [33]

    Bulava, M.T

    J. Bulava, M.T. Hansen, M.W. Hansen, A. Patella and N. Tantalo,Inclusive rates from smeared spectral densities in the two-dimensional O(3) non-linearσ-model,JHEP07(2022) 034 [2111.12774]

  34. [34]

    Mesonic low-energy constants

    J. Bijnens and G. Ecker,Mesonic low-energy constants,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64(2014) 149 [1405.6488]

  35. [35]

    tmLQCD: a program suite to simulate Wilson Twisted mass Lattice QCD

    K. Jansen and C. Urbach,tmLQCD: A Program suite to simulate Wilson Twisted mass Lattice QCD,Comput. Phys. Commun.180(2009) 2717 [0905.3331]

  36. [36]

    Recent developments in the tmLQCD software suite

    A. Abdel-Rehim, F. Burger, A. Deuzeman, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, L. Scorzato et al.,Recent developments in the tmLQCD software suite,PoSLATTICE2013(2014) 414 [1311.5495]

  37. [37]

    Experiences with OpenMP in tmLQCD

    A. Deuzeman, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa and C. Urbach,Experiences with OpenMP in tmLQCD,PoSLATTICE2013 (2014) 416 [1311.4521]. [45]ETMcollaboration,Twisted mass ensemble generation on GPU machines,PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 340 [2212.06635]. [46]ETMcollaboration,Lemon: an MPI parallel I/O library for data encapsulation using LIME,Comput. Phys. Commun. 183(2012) 13...

  38. [38]

    Adaptive Aggregation Based Domain Decomposition Multigrid for the Lattice Wilson Dirac Operator

    A. Frommer, K. Kahl, S. Krieg, B. Leder and M. Rottmann,Adaptive Aggregation-Based Domain Decomposition Multigrid for the Lattice Wilson–Dirac Operator,SIAM J. Sci. Comput.36(2014) A1581 [1303.1377]

  39. [39]

    Adaptive Aggregation-based Domain Decomposition Multigrid for Twisted Mass Fermions

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, A. Frommer, K. Kahl and M. Rottmann,Adaptive Aggregation-based Domain Decomposition Multigrid for Twisted Mass Fermions,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 114509 [1610.02370]

  40. [40]

    Multigrid accelerated simulations for Twisted Mass fermions

    S. Bacchio, C. Alexandrou and J. Finkerath,Multigrid accelerated simulations for Twisted Mass fermions,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 02002 [1710.06198]

  41. [41]

    Multigrid approach in shifted linear systems for the non-degenerated twisted mass operator

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio and J. Finkenrath,Multigrid approach in shifted linear systems for the non-degenerated twisted mass operator,Comput. Phys. Commun.236(2019) 51 [1805.09584]

  42. [42]

    Jo´ o, D.D

    B. Jo´ o, D.D. Kalamkar, T. Kurth, K. Vaidyanathan and A. Walden,Optimizing Wilson-Dirac Operator and Linear Solvers for Intel®KNL, inHigh Performance Computing, M. Taufer, B. Mohr and J.M. Kunkel, eds., (Cham), pp. 415–427, Springer International Publishing, 2016

  43. [43]

    Accelerating Twisted Mass LQCD with QPhiX

    M. Schr¨ ock, S. Simula and A. Strelchenko,Accelerating Twisted Mass LQCD with QPhiX,PoSLATTICE2015(2016) 030 [1510.08879]

  44. [44]

    Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs

    M.A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R.C. Brower and C. Rebbi,Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs,Comput. Phys. Commun.181(2010) 1517 [0911.3191]

  45. [45]

    Scaling Lattice QCD beyond 100 GPUs

    R. Babich, M.A. Clark, B. Joo, G. Shi, R.C. Brower and S. Gottlieb,Scaling Lattice QCD beyond 100 GPUs, inSC11 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis Seattle, Washington, November 12-18, 2011, 2011, DOI [1109.2935]

  46. [46]

    Accelerating Lattice QCD Multigrid on GPUs Using Fine-Grained Parallelization

    M.A. Clark, B. Jo´ o, A. Strelchenko, M. Cheng, A. Gambhir and R.C. Brower,Accelerating Lattice QCD Multigrid on GPUs Using Fine-Grained Parallelization, inSC ’16: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 795–806, 2016, DOI [1612.07873]