Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation

As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 35 of 35 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.17095.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2505.17095 v1

Coverage vector

measured 35 of 35 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:22.701010Z

measured 35 of 35 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

35 of 35 outbound references displayed

verified exact10
verified fuzzy0
unresolved18
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier5
metadata mismatch2

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 545e9168-9c1c-4fa1-a6d6-2160340b64ce · outbound

This paper cites online" 'onlinestring :=.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation online" 'onlinestring :=

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:18.545896Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3e199913-0c7e-493e-b552-1f73826b8e57 · outbound

This paper cites write newline.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation write newline

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:18.676307Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6f031bff-9e47-4538-8380-c782f87652aa · outbound

This paper cites Non-Determinism of "Deterministic" LLM Settings.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Non-Determinism of "Deterministic" LLM Settings

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:18.784104Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cb749c51-d812-4432-8d9b-66baad453fd4 · outbound

This paper cites Rahmani, and Youlin Li.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Rahmani, and Youlin Li

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:26.006630Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 35ad88a8-a0a5-4022-af59-67259a56e4ab · outbound

This paper cites Sebire, Saleh Khalil, Elham Asgari, Christopher Tan, Andrew Taylor, and Dominic Pimenta.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Sebire, Saleh Khalil, Elham Asgari, Christopher Tan, Andrew Taylor, and Dominic Pimenta

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:19.025921Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f0354ff8-c2e3-4b61-9a13-cabf543b041e · outbound

This paper cites Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Models.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Models

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:19.116860Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 03e9cc4a-01bd-4cd9-973f-6860447e380e · outbound

This paper cites Intelligent Clinical Documentation: Harnessing Generative AI for Patient-Centric Clinical Note Generation.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Intelligent Clinical Documentation: Harnessing Generative AI for Patient-Centric Clinical Note Generation

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:19.270196Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b5c38088-02c5-4497-a132-c5fa265f4781 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:25.789786Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 4762bb75-b517-48c9-a52f-b6a177d21600 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:19.419917Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 016cd5c8-f737-4163-8f59-2481fb8ccbc1 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:19.474288Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation db66a195-658c-4d4d-ad70-a76d807b50de · outbound

This paper cites Nambudiri.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Nambudiri

Reference 11

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:25.516563Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation d218f442-d4aa-4f91-8526-093e25e86295 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 12

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:25.211566Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 8d3c30a9-5ce3-4dfe-aea0-71832e21c7cd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 13

Resolution: malformed identifier; doi_truncated, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:24.911183Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation b4f155b0-a035-4adf-bc0b-acfbe676b719 · outbound

This paper cites Gold, and Vishnu Mohan.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Gold, and Vishnu Mohan

Reference 14

Resolution: malformed identifier; doi_truncated, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:24.646083Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 0b00c702-a108-430f-b331-d05736248e93 · outbound

This paper cites Akdogan, Jessica Atkins, Mohamed B.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Akdogan, Jessica Atkins, Mohamed B

Reference 15

Resolution: metadata mismatch; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:26.928726Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 360da593-0879-41ae-b68d-d180032a3f19 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:27.709683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 471f0add-3d1d-4d98-b9e8-5ada45aac9cc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 17

Resolution: metadata mismatch; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:26.715873Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 66b77b6c-3cb5-46a4-bb30-34e4f5e0ae11 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 18

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:26.543053Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation f0bda5ea-ae83-4587-9ad0-18d2cf1f5e63 · outbound

This paper cites McCoy, Faye Yu Ci Ng, Christopher M.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation McCoy, Faye Yu Ci Ng, Christopher M

Reference 19

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:24.346060Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 9c0539b9-67c4-4346-b6ec-8b8f6dc119f9 · outbound

This paper cites Pennathur.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Pennathur

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:24.065742Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 7076c52c-d4d9-4717-86ae-8babcc286d6f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:20.840862Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3dd95755-3335-47c8-90c9-2a4a316c76e1 · outbound

This paper cites Quiroz, Liliana Laranjo, Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Shlomo Berkovsky, Dana Rezazadegan, and Enrico Coiera.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Quiroz, Liliana Laranjo, Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Shlomo Berkovsky, Dana Rezazadegan, and Enrico Coiera

Reference 22

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:23.800870Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation dcd1a8d0-97bd-4d35-a5ad-19a631f90eba · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:21.045394Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8bcd07dc-8050-4cc9-8e32-0f41c6a7c13a · outbound

This paper cites Evaluating Consistency and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Evaluating Consistency and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:21.131043Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a08155d6-4545-4c81-90bb-908ddb7edd6c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:27.571936Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation a31d8ed8-6421-4745-91a0-bf2c0f81b4a1 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 26

Resolution: malformed identifier; doi_truncated, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:23.505634Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 43ed2592-f723-4b4e-8681-1e7894b5f171 · outbound

This paper cites Towards Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models for Expert-Level Clinical Note Generation.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Towards Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models for Expert-Level Clinical Note Generation

Reference 27

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:26.272163Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation a6267c53-5da6-4ecf-a5a7-6a05736bf0a9 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 28

Resolution: malformed identifier; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:21.711043Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 52e6195b-9c5f-4d53-82b7-fd7a8ccc746e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:21.819970Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 524d9d08-9753-4281-bfed-e5bb647aad90 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution: malformed identifier; doi_truncated, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:23.238463Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 3359e3e9-8a9c-4779-8484-ce2658534173 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:22.130493Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 224e5fb2-952e-4f34-9811-f7240bb54e4a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:27.413515Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 2dd1728c-1d31-487b-b5fc-577f9164bcd2 · outbound

This paper cites BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT

Reference 33

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:22.370716Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 37bc608e-0626-4d53-ba53-32c804110b48 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 34

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:22.995871Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 42334b87-d979-4a62-9709-4d43b0c01f1d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are LLMs reliable? An exploration of the reliability of large language models in clinical note generation Unresolved cited work

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T15:28:27.263988Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.