Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 108 references

Ferroelectricity in antiferromagnetic wurtzite nitrides

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes MnSiN2 and MnGeN2 as the parent compounds of a new multiferroic wurtzite nitride family that is simultaneously ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic at room temperature, and whose nonrelativistic spin splitting…

desk verdict Solid computational materials study with a real abstract overclaim: the modeled 180-degree switching path does not reverse the spin splitting, and the paper should say so. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06325 v1 pith:H3MKA5HI submitted 2025-09-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Steven M. Baksa , Lin-Ding Yuan , Stephen D. Wilson , James M. Rondinelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectricsantiferromagnetsaltermagnetswurtzitenitridesmultiferroicsnonrelativisticspinsplittingspintronicsfirst-principlescalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the Mn(II) wurtzite nitrides MnSiN2 and MnGeN2 are the parent compounds of a new multiferroic family: they are simultaneously ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic, with magnetic order surviving above room temperature. Density-functional calculations show these compounds are polar, with polarization values of order 1.2–1.4 C/m2 and polarization-reversal barriers of 0.96 and 0.46 eV per formula unit, respectively. The paper further shows that 25% substitution of Zn or Mg on the Mn site yields ordered compounds with lower barriers, wider band gaps, and retained G-type antiferromagnetic order, while substitution on the Si/Ge site tunes the magnetic exchange. It demonstrates that these nitrides are altermagnets with nonrelativistic spin splitting, and that the sign of that splitting reverses when the polarization is switched through inversion-related states, an effect the authors propose as the basis for electric-field control of spin texture in antiferromagnetic spintronics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the polar wurtzite structure (space group $Pna2_1$) with G-type antiferromagnetic order on Mn$^{2+}$ ($d^5$) sites, which gives rise to nonrelativistic spin splitting (NRSS) even without spin-orbit coupling. The splitting is governed by the spin-structure motif pairs that lock the spin-dipole orientation to the local crystal environment; an inversion operation reverses the tetrahedral crystal field and hence the splitting, while a mirror operation does not. Ferroelectric switching is analyzed as a sequential columnar process in which the most electronegative cation (Si or Ge) controls the barrier, and the paper uses the computed per-cation barriers to explain why A-site substitution lowers barriers whereas B-site substitution does not consistently do so.

What would settle it

Coat or grow a MnSiN2 or MnGeN2 film, pole it with an electric field, and measure the spin-resolved band structure (e.g., by spin- and angle-resolved photoemission) before and after switching. If the sign of the nonrelativistic spin splitting does not reverse, or if the switched state is a mirror twin rather than an inversion domain, the central switchability claim is falsified. The paper itself notes that the modeled 180-degree path predicts no reversal, so the experiment would settle which domain type actually forms.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that MnSiN2 and MnGeN2 are aristotypes of a wurtzite nitride family where ferroelectricity and room-temperature G-type antiferromagnetism coexist. Using density-functional calculations, the paper shows that both compounds are polar with spontaneous polarization on the order of 1.2–1.4 C/m2, strong antiferromagnetic exchange (5–9 meV/Mn), and moderate band gaps, while the nonmagnetic analogues ZnSiN2 and MgSiN2 have high barriers and wide gaps that make them promising ferroelectric candidates. The paper's key functional claim is that the nonrelativistic spin splitting characteristic of altermagnets is locked to the polarization direction: in an inversion domain pair, switching the polarization reverses the local crystal field on the spin sublattices and reverses the sign of the spin splitting, whereas in the 180-degree mirror-domain path modeled for switching, the splitting is unchanged. On this basis the authors present the family, together with its cation-ordered derivatives, as a platform for room-temperature electric-field-switchable altermagnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the spin splitting reverses sign upon polarization switching depends on real ferroelectric switching connecting inversion-related states; the low-energy switching path actually modeled connects mirror-related 180-degree domains, which the paper shows leave the splitting unchanged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ZnSiN2 and MgSiN2 are identified as practical ferroelectric candidates with low barriers and wide gaps, and the ordered compounds Mn3(Zn/Mg)Si4N8 and related Ge analogues retain G-type antiferromagnetic order with reduced barriers.
  • If the switchable altermagnetism is realized, these nitrides offer room-temperature antiferromagnetic spintronic devices whose spin texture can be written and read electrically.
  • The electronegativity-based design rules for wurtzite ferroelectrics are refined: per-cation barrier analysis shows that simply substituting less electronegative cations is insufficient, and defect interactions matter.
  • The distinction between inversion domains and 180-degree domains provides a criterion for when ferroelectric switching can reverse altermagnetic spin splitting in wurtzite ferroelectrics generally.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the modeled switching path is mirror-like, practical devices may need engineered heterostructures or defects to force inversion-domain switching if the sign reversal is to be exploited.
  • The same inversion-vs-mirror domain distinction likely applies to other proposed altermagnetic ferroelectrics beyond nitrides, such as BiFeO3, and could be tested there with the same spin-resolved measurement.
  • The design strategy of substituting alkaline-earth cations could be extended to rare-earth wurtzite nitrides such as (Eu,Mn)(Si/Ge)N2, potentially producing 4f–3d exchange-coupled altermagnetic multiferroics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports DFT-PBE and nudged-elastic-band calculations for wurtzite-type ABN2 nitrides (A = Mn, Zn, Mg, Cd, Ca; B = Si, Ge, Ti, Zr, Hf), focusing on MnSiN2 and MnGeN2 and 25% cation-ordered derivatives. The authors compute ferroelectric reversal barriers and pathways, electric polarizations, band structures, dielectric and electro-optic responses, magnetic exchange parameters from four spin configurations, and nonrelativistic spin splitting in the +P and −P states. They propose Zn/Mg-substituted ordered compounds as promising ferroelectric antiferromagnets and claim that the family exhibits altermagnetic spin splitting that reverses sign upon polarization switching.

Significance. The paper is a useful, internally consistent computational survey with several strengths: systematic treatment of multiple chemical substitutions, explicit NEB analysis of sequential columnar switching, extraction of Jv and J∥ from DFT total energies without fitting to experiment, and public deposition of data. If the NRSS-reversal claim were tied to a computed electric-field switching path, the work would establish a concrete nitride platform for room-temperature altermagnetic multiferroics. As it stands, the significance is contingent because the advertised switchability is not connected to the modeled ferroelectric pathway.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. II.D; Fig. 7; Fig. S13] The claim that altermagnetic spin splitting reverses sign upon polarization switching is not supported by the computed ferroelectric switching path. The NEB path in Fig. 3 connects −P and +P states that are mirror-related 180° domains, and the authors state in Sec. II.D that mirror-related domains exhibit the same spin splitting; only inversion-domain pairs reverse the NRSS, as shown in Fig. S13. The ±P band structures in Fig. 7 therefore do not correspond to the endpoint pair of the modeled switching path. Because no electric-field pathway between inversion domains is computed, the abstract-level claim overstates what is demonstrated.
  2. [Sec. II.D] The manuscript acknowledges that the two domain types produce fundamentally distinct NRSS responses that warrant experimental investigation, which is an explicit admission that the link between the modeled polarization reversal and switchable spin texture is missing. To make the central claim load-bearing, the authors should either compute a barrier or pathway connecting inversion-domain states or qualify the abstract and introduction so that electric-field switchable spin texture is presented as a prediction contingent on an unmodeled domain-switching mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The band gaps 1.6 and 1.0 eV are PBE values and are not labeled as computed; the text reports experimental optical gaps of 3.5 and 2.5 eV for MnSiN2 and MnGeN2, so the abstract's numbers are easy to misread as experimental.
  2. [Conclusion] The phrase 'alkali-earth metals' should be 'alkaline-earth metals'.
  3. [Table S3] The sentence describing MgSiN2 as a noticeable exception is confusing because both the computed band gap and the computed dielectric constant are underestimated relative to experiment; please rephrase to state exactly which comparison is meant.
  4. [Fig. S13 caption] The caption would be clearer if it marked explicitly which pairs are mirror domains and which are inversion domains, since the main text relies on this distinction.
  5. [References] Reference [79] contains the placeholder '[URL inserted by publisher]'; the final version should include the actual URL or a full citation to the Supporting Information.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all load-bearing quantities are direct DFT outputs; the self-citations are interpretive and independently supported.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained at the level of its central computed quantities. Ferroelectric reversal barriers (Sec. II.B, Figs. 3 and 5) are nudged-elastic-band total-energy differences between relaxed poled structures, with no fitted parameters. Magnetic exchange parameters Jv and J-parallel (Sec. II.C and SI Eqs. S8-S11) are obtained by solving a Heisenberg model against four DFT spin-order energies; the G-AFM ground state is read directly from those DFT energies, not predicted from fitted parameters, and no spin-splitting result is derived from the fitted J values. Nonrelativistic spin splitting and its behavior under polarization reversal (Sec. II.D, Fig. 7, SI Fig. S13) are direct band-structure outputs. The cited spin-motif framework (refs. 18 and 56) is used for interpretation and classification, but the computed band structures stand independently; the cited theory is parameter-free and does not assume the target result. The only notable issue is internal consistency: Sec. II.D and SI Fig. S13 explicitly state that the 180-degree mirror switching path modeled in Fig. 3 does not reverse the nonrelativistic spin splitting, and only inversion domains do, whereas the abstract states without qualification that the splitting reverses upon polarization switching. That is a correctness/support gap, not a circularity, and does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are direct DFT outputs with no fitted parameters. The main manual choice is the 25 percent substitution level. The paper leans on standard DFT, Heisenberg exchange mapping, NEB switching, and the authors' prior spin-splitting framework; none of these are fitted to the target predictions, but they are domain assumptions.

free parameters (1)
  • Dopant molar concentration x = 0.25
    25 percent substitution was chosen by hand to model ordered compounds; the paper does not explore concentration dependence, and the claim of a general family assumes this concentration is representative.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE with norm-conserving PseudoDojo pseudopotentials accurately describes total-energy differences for polarization reversal and magnetic ordering.
    All barriers and exchange parameters are computed at the GGA-PBE level; the paper acknowledges PBE underestimates band gaps but relies on PBE energies for the design trends.
  • domain assumption Heisenberg Hamiltonian with two exchange couplings Jv and J-parallel and S=5/2 captures the magnetic energetics.
    SI Eqs. S7-S11; ignores the experimentally observed 0.6-degree canting in MnSiN2 and possible higher-order spin interactions.
  • domain assumption NEB minimum energy paths with relaxed +P and -P end points represent the ferroelectric switching mechanism without applied field or temperature effects.
    Standard method, but no coercive field estimate or dynamical stability check is provided.
  • domain assumption The 25 percent ordered compounds are thermodynamically accessible despite positive mixing enthalpies.
    Mixing enthalpies range from 44 to 170 meV/f.u., so the compounds are metastable; the design recommendations assume synthetic accessibility.
  • domain assumption The spin-structure motif pair framework from refs 18 and 56 correctly predicts when NRSS reversal occurs.
    The reversal argument relies on this prior symmetry-based framework by the same group.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferroelectricity in antiferromagnetic wurtzite nitrides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H3MKA5HI

@misc{pith2026250906325,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferroelectricity in antiferromagnetic wurtzite nitrides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H3MKA5HI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06325}
}
abstract

Wurtzite-type nitrides have recently emerged as promising candidates for ferroelectric applications, yet their magnetic counterparts remain largely unexplored. Here, we establish MnSiN$_2$ and MnGeN$_2$ as aristotypes of a new multiferroic wurtzite family that simultaneously exhibits ferroelectricity and antiferromagnetism. These Mn(II)-based nitrides crystallize in polar structures and display robust G-type antiferromagnetism at room temperature. First-principles calculations reveal that nonmagnetic analogs incorporating Zn and Mg possess high polarization reversal barriers (0.735 and 0.683 eV per formula unit) and wide band gaps (4.0 and 4.8 eV), making them ideal ferroelectric candidates. In contrast, MnSiN$_2$ and MnGeN$_2$ exhibit strong antiferromagnetic exchange interactions (5--9 meV per Mn site) and moderate band gaps (1.6 and 1.0 eV), with reversal barriers of 0.963 and 0.460 eV per formula unit, respectively. Despite their limited magnetoelectric coupling, we show this family of Type-1 multiferroics exhibits altermagnetic spin splitting which reverses sign upon polarization switching. By strategically substituting alkaline-earth metals, we engineer multiple materials with coexisting switchable polarization, spin texture, and magnetic order. These findings open new avenues for the design of nitride-based altermagnetic multiferroics, offering a platform for integrated antiferromagnetic spintronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06325 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Unit cell of wurtzite-type structure of Mn(Si,Ge)N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Projected density of states (PDOS) for (a) G-AFM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Minimum energy pathways of sequential FE polarization reversal in (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. FE polarization reversal barriers of end members and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Minimum energy pathways of the (a) (Mn, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Magnetic exchange parameters ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Switching of the nonrelativistic spin splitting (NRSS) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pristine ternary nitrides While a uniform switching model is applied to bulk binary wurtzites [ 50–52], the primary mechanism in sub- stituted and complex wurtzites is columnar switching, where metal-nitrogen columns oriented along the ⟨001⟩ crystallographic direction are switched sequentially until all columns are switched. Fig. 3 shows the computed min-...

  2. [2]

    Factors that contribute to the stability and formation of ternary and quaternary nitrides include electronegativity, ionic size, and charge effects [ 54]

    Cation-ordered nitrides Ordered compounds of MnSiN 2 and MnGeN 2 via A- site and B-site cation substitution at 25% dopant mo- lar concentration are considered based on the appeal of the bridging ferroelectricity and antiferromagnetism in a single materials system. Factors that contribute to the stability and formation of ternary and quaternary nitrides in...

  3. [3]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    S. A. Wolf, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spin- tronics—A retrospective and perspective, IBM J. Res. Dev. 50, 101 (2006)

    2006

  5. [5]

    S. D. Bader and S. S. P. Parkin, Spintronics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 77 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Bhatti, R

    S. Bhatti, R. Sbiaa, A. Hirohata, H. Ohno, S. Fukami, and S. N. Piramanayagam, Spintronics based random access memory: A review, Mater. Today 20, 530 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Fukami, H

    S. Fukami, H. Sato, M. Yamanouchi, S. Ikeda, F. Mat- sukura, and H. Ohno, Advances in spintronics devices for microelectronics–From spin-transfer torque to spin-orbit torque, ASPDAC 1, 684 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Fusil, V

    S. Fusil, V. Garcia, A. Barth´ el´ emy, and M. Bibes, Magne- toelectric devices for spintronics, Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 91 (2014)

    2014

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    C. ´O. Coile´ ain and H. C. Wu, Materials, devices and spin transfer torque in antiferromagnetic spintronics: A concise review, SPIN 7, 1740014 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    X. Ling, X. Zhou, K. Huang, Y. Liu, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Recent advances in the spin Hall effect of light, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 066401 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Gomonay, T

    O. Gomonay, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Concepts of antiferromagnetic spintronics, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 11, 1700022 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    B. H. Rimmler, B. Pal, and S. S. P. Parkin, Non-collinear antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 109 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Z. Guo, X. Wang, W. Wang, G. Zhang, X. Zhou, and Z. Cheng, Spin-polarized antiferromagnets for spintronics, Adv. Mater. , 2505779 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Esmaeilzadeh, U

    S. Esmaeilzadeh, U. H ˚ alenius, and M. Valldor, Crystal growth, magnetic, and optical properties of the ternary nitride MnSiN 2, Chem. Mater. 18, 2713 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    H¨ ausler, R

    J. H¨ ausler, R. Niklaus, J. Min´ ar, and W. Schnick, Am- monothermal synthesis and optical properties of ternary nitride semiconductors Mg-IV-N 2, Mn-IV-N 2 and Li-IV 2- N3 (IV = Si, Ge), Chem. Eur. J. 24, 1686 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Kautzsch, A

    L. Kautzsch, A. B. Georgescu, D. Puggioni, G. Kent, K. M. Taddei, A. Reilly, R. Seshadri, J. M. Rondinelli, and S. D. Wilson, Canted antiferromagnetism in polar MnSiN2 with high N´ eel temperature,Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 104406 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    L.-D. Yuan, A. B. Georgescu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonrel- ativistic spin splitting at the Brillouin zone center in com- pensated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216701 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    V. K. Lazarov, L. Li, M.Weinert, and M. Gajdardziska- Josifovska, Structure determination of a magnetic semi- conductor: MnGeN 2, Microsc. Microanal. 10, 516 (2004)

    2004

  14. [22]

    C. L. Rom, R. W. Smaha, C. L. Melamed, R. R. Schnepf, K. N. Heinselman, J. S. Mangum, S.-J. Lee, S. Lany, L. T. Schelhas, A. L. Greenaway, J. R. Neilson, S. R. Bauers, A. C. Tamboli, and J. S. Andrew, Combinatorial synthesis of cation-disordered manganese tin nitride MnSnN 2 t...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Niewa, Nitridocompounds of manganese: Manganese nitrides and nitridomanganates, Z

    R. Niewa, Nitridocompounds of manganese: Manganese nitrides and nitridomanganates, Z. Kristallogr. 217, 8 (2002)

    2002

  16. [24]

    Calderon, J

    S. Calderon, J. Hayden, S. M. Baksa, W. Tzou, S. Trolier- McKinstry, I. Dabo, J.-P. Maria, and E. C. Dickey, Atomic- scale polarization switching in wurtzite ferroelectrics, Sci- ence 380, 1034 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    K.-H. Kim, I. Karpov, R. H. Olsson, and D. Jariwala, Wurtzite and fluorite ferroelectric materials for electronic memory, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 422 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    P. Wang, D. Wang, S. Mondal, M. Hu, J. Liu, and Z. Mi, Dawn of nitride ferroelectric semiconductors: From ma- terials to devices, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 38, 043002 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Opoku, K

    F. Opoku, K. K. Govender, C. G. C. E. van Sittert, and P. P. Govender, Understanding the mechanism of en- hanced charge separation and visible light photocatalytic activity of modified wurtzite ZnO with nanoclusters of 11 ZnS and graphene oxide: From a hybrid density functional...

    2018

  20. [28]

    Bashyal, C

    K. Bashyal, C. K. Pyles, S. Afroosheh, A. Lamichhane, and A. T. Zayak, Empirical optimization of DFT+U and HSE for the band structure of ZnO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 065501 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    L. Shi, Y. Qin, J. Hu, Y. Duan, L. Qu, L. Wu, and G. Tang, Strain-assisted structural transformation and band gap tuning in BeO, MgTe, CdS and 2H-SiC: A hybrid density functional study, EPL 106, 57001 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    H. Tan, H. Liu, Y. Li, W. Duan, and S. Zhang, Under- standing the origin of bandgap problem in transition and post-transition metal oxides, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 124703 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Y. Duan, L. Qin, L. Shi, G. Tang, and H. Shi, Hybrid density functional theory study of band gap tuning in AlN and GaN through equibiaxial strains, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 022104 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Y. Duan, L. Qin, L. Shi, and G. Tang, More accurate predictions of band gap tuned by pressure in InN using HSE06 and GW approximations, Comput. Mater. Sci. 101, 56 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Resta and D

    R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization: A modern approach, Phys. Ferroelectr. 105, 31 (2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    N. A. Spaldin, A beginner’s guide to the modern theory of polarization, J. Solid State Chem. 195, 2 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    T. Endo, Y. Sato, H. Takizawa, and M. Shimada, High-pressure synthesis of new compounds, ZnSiN 2 and ZnGeN2 with distorted wurtzite structure, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11, 424 (1992)

    1992

  29. [37]

    H¨ ausler, S

    J. H¨ ausler, S. Schimmel, P. Wellmann, and W. Schnick, Ammonothermal synthesis of earth-abundant nitride semi- conductors ZnSiN 2 and ZnGeN 2 and dissolution monitor- ing by in situ X-ray imaging, Chem. Eur. J. 23, 12275 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Ogura, D

    M. Ogura, D. Han, M. M. Pointner, L. S. Junkers, S. S. Rudel, W. Schnick, and H. Ebert, Electronic properties of semiconducting Zn(Si,Ge,Sn)N 2 alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 024601 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    R. J. Bruls, H. T. Hintzen, and R. Metselaar, Preparation and characterisation of MgSiN 2 powders, J. Mater. Sci. 34, 4519 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    J. B. Quirk, M. R ˚ asander, C. M. McGilvery, R. Palgrave, and M. A. Moram, Band gap and electronic structure of MgSiN2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 112108 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Lyu and W

    S. Lyu and W. R. L. Lambrecht, Quasiparticle self- consistent GW electronic band structure of Cd-IV-N 2 compounds, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 024606 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    C.-W. Lee, K. Yazawa, A. Zakutayev, G. L. Brennecka, and P. Gorai, Switching it up: New mechanisms revealed in wurtzite-type ferroelectrics, Sci. Adv. 10, eadl0848 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, and K. A. Persson, Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    S. Song, Y. Yan, S. Wang, Y. Li, S. Li, M. Wu, J. Hong, and G. Tang, Ferroelectric polarization and piezoelec- tric properties in orthorhombic Zn 3WN4 and Zn 3MoN4: An atomic sublattice decomposition, Phys. Rev. B 112, 024107 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable altermag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  38. [47]

    G. Yang, H. Wang, S. Mu, H. Xie, T. Wang, C. He, M. Shen, M. Liu, C. G. V. de Walle, and H. X. Tang, Unveiling the Pockels coefficient of ferroelectric nitride ScAlN, Nat. Commun. 15, 9538 (2024)

    2024

  39. [48]

    S. H. Wemple, J. DiDomenico, M., and I. Camlibel, Re- lationship between linear and quadratic electro-optic co- efficients in linbo 3, litao 3, and other oxygen-octahedra ferroelectrics based on direct measurement of spontaneous polarization., Applied Physics Letters 12, 209 (1968)

    1968

  40. [49]

    D. R. Penn, Wave-number-dependent dielectric function of semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 128, 2093 (1962)

    1962

  41. [50]

    B. Wang, W. Huang, L. Chi, M. Al-Hashimi, T. J. Marks, and A. Facchetti, High- k gate dielectrics for emerging flexible and stretchable electronics, Chem. Rev. 118, 5690 (2018)

    2018

  42. [51]

    C. M. Fang, R. A. de Groot, R. J. Bruls, H. T. Hintzen, and G. de With, Ab initio band structure calculations of Mg3N2 and MgSiN 2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 4833 (1999)

    1999

  43. [52]

    Moriwake, A

    H. Moriwake, A. Konishi, T. Ogawa, K. Fujimura, C. A. J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, T. Shimizu, S. Yasui, and M. Itoh, Ferroelectricity in wurtzite structure simple chalcogenide, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 242909 (2014)

    2014

  44. [53]

    Moriwake, R

    H. Moriwake, R. Yokoi, A. Taguchi, T. Ogawa, C. A. J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, Y. Sato, T. Shimizu, Y. Hamasaki, H. Takashima, and M. Itoh, A computational search for wurtzite-structured ferroelectrics with low coercive volt- ages, APL Mater. 8, 121102 (2020)

    2020

  45. [54]

    Yang, Physics of ferroelectric wurtzite Al 1−xScxN thin films, Adv

    F. Yang, Physics of ferroelectric wurtzite Al 1−xScxN thin films, Adv. Electon. Mater. 11, 2400279 (2024)

    2024

  46. [55]

    R. D. Shannon, Revised effective ionic radii and system- atic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalco- genides, Acta Cryst. A32, 751 (1976)

    1976

  47. [56]

    J. Won, T. Kim, M. Lee, D. W. Davies, G. Lee, A. Walsh, A. Soon, J.-Y. Kim, and W. Shim, Mapping cation-eutaxy ternary with a phenomenological model, Nat. Commun. 16, 5634 (2025)

    2025

  48. [57]

    D. Wang, M. Shaikh, S. Ghosh, and B. Sanyal, Predic- tion of half-metallic ferrimagnetic quadruple perovskites ACu3Fe2Re2O12 (A=Ca, Sr, Ba, Pb, Sc, Y, La) with high Curie temperatures, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 054405 (2021)

    2021

  49. [58]

    Yuan and A

    L. Yuan and A. Zunger, Degeneracy removal of spin bands in collinear antiferromagnets with non-interconvertible spin-structure motif pair, Advanced Materials 35, e2211966 (2023)

    2023

  50. [59]

    C. H. Skidmore, R. J. Spurling, J. Hayden, S. M. Baksa, D. Behrendt, D. Goodling, J. L. Nordlander, A. Suceava, J. Casamento, B. Akkopru-Akgun, S. Calderon, I. Dabo, V. Gopalan, K. P. Kelley, A. M. Rappe, S. Trolier- McKinstry, E. C. Dickey, and J.-P. Maria, Proximity ferroele...

    2025

  51. [60]

    Fichtner, G

    S. Fichtner, G. Sch¨ onweger, C.-W. Lee, Keisuke, P. Gorai, and G. L. Brennecka, Polarization and domains in 12 wurtzite ferroelectrics: Fundamentals and applications, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 021310 (2025)

    2025

  52. [61]

    Huang, J

    J. Huang, J. Li, X. Guo, T. Wen, D. J. Srolovitz, Z. Chen, Z. Chen, and S. Liu, Atomistic structure of transient switching states in ferroelectric AlScN, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18241 10.48550/arxiv.2508.18241 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  53. [63]

    Giannozzi et al

    P. Giannozzi et al. , Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with QUANTUM ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  54. [65]

    M. J. van Setten et al. , The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseu- dopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  55. [66]

    Lejaeghere et al

    K. Lejaeghere et al. , Reproducibility in density functional theory calculations of solids, Science 351, aad3000 (2018)

    2018

  56. [67]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 95, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  57. [68]

    J. P. Perdew et al. , Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992)

    1992

  58. [69]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approxi- mation with correct asymptotic behavior, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988)

    1988

  59. [70]

    D. C. Langreth and M. J. Mehl, Beyond the local-density approximation in calculations of ground-state electronic properties, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1809 (1983)

    1983

  60. [71]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  61. [74]

    G¨ orling, Exchange-correlation potentials with proper discontinuities for physically meaningful Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and band structures, Phys

    A. G¨ orling, Exchange-correlation potentials with proper discontinuities for physically meaningful Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and band structures, Phys. Rev. B 91, 245120 (2015)

    2015

  62. [75]

    Setyawan and S

    W. Setyawan and S. Curtarolo, High-throughput elec- tronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools, Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 299 (2010)

    2010

  63. [76]

    J. E. Sipe and E. Ghahramani, Nonlinear optical response of semiconductors in the independent-particle approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. B 48, 11705 (1993)

    1993

  64. [77]

    J´ onsson, G

    H. J´ onsson, G. Mills, and K. W. Jacobsen, Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Systems (World Scientific, 1998)

    1998

  65. [78]

    Henkelman and H

    G. Henkelman and H. J´ onsson, Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978 (2000)

    2000

  66. [79]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. J´ onsson, A climb- ing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901 (2000)

    2000

  67. [80]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polar- ization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651(R) (1993)

    1993

  68. [81]

    (), See Supplemental Materials at [URL inserted by pub- lisher] for additional details on

  69. [82]

    (), S. M. Baksa, L.-D. Yuan, S. D. Wilson, J. M. Rondinelli, Ferroelectricity in antiferromagnetic wurtzite nitrides [dataset], Dryad (2025). https://doi.org/10. 5061/dryad.0rxwdbsd6. supporting information Ferroelectricity in antiferromagnetic wurtzite nitrides Steven M. Baks...

    2025

  70. [83]

    R. J. Bruls, H. T. Hintzen, and R. Metselaar, Preparation and chara cterisation of MgSiN 2 powders, J. Mater. Sci. 34, 4519 (1999)

    1999

  71. [84]

    H¨ ausler, R

    J. H¨ ausler, R. Niklaus, J. Min´ ar, and W. Schnick, Ammonotherm al synthesis and optical properties of ternary nitride semiconductors Mg-IV-N 2, Mn-IV-N 2 and Li-IV 2-N3 (IV = Si, Ge), Chem. Eur. J. 24, 1686 (2018)

    2018

  72. [85]

    Kautzsch, A

    L. Kautzsch, A. B. Georgescu, D. Puggioni, G. Kent, K. M. Taddei , A. Reilly, R. Seshadri, J. M. Rondinelli, and S. D. Wilson, Canted antiferromagnetism in polar MnSiN 2 with high N´ eel temperature,Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 104406 (2023)

    2023

  73. [86]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approx imation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  74. [87]

    L. J. Sham and M. Schl¨ uter, Density-functional theory of the energy gap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983)

    1983

  75. [88]

    L. J. Sham and M. Schl¨ uter, Density-functional theory of the band gap, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3883 (1985)

    1985

  76. [89]

    G¨ orling, Exchange-correlation potentials with proper disc ontinuities for physically meaningful Kohn-Sham eigenvalu es and band structures, Phys

    A. G¨ orling, Exchange-correlation potentials with proper disc ontinuities for physically meaningful Kohn-Sham eigenvalu es and band structures, Phys. Rev. B 91, 245120 (2015)

    2015

  77. [90]

    Kawamura, Y

    F. Kawamura, Y. Song, H. Murata, H. Tampo, T. Nagai, T. Koida, M. Imura, and N. Yamada, Tunability of the bandgap of SnS by variation of the cell volume by alloying with A. E. ele ments, Sci. Rep. 12, 7434 (2022)

    2022

  78. [91]

    J. E. Sipe and E. Ghahramani, Nonlinear optical response of sem iconductors in the independent-particle approximation, Phys. Rev. B 48, 11705 (1993)

    1993

  79. [92]

    H¨ ausler, S

    J. H¨ ausler, S. Schimmel, P. Wellmann, and W. Schnick, Ammonothermal synthesis of earth-abundant nitride semiconductors ZnSiN2 and ZnGeN 2 and dissolution monitoring by in situ X-ray imaging, Chem. Eur. J. 23, 12275 (2017)

    2017

  80. [93]

    Ogura, D

    M. Ogura, D. Han, M. M. Pointner, L. S. Junkers, S. S. Rudel, W. Schn ick, and H. Ebert, Electronic properties of semiconducting Zn(Si,Ge,Sn)N 2 alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 024601 (2021)

    2021

  81. [94]

    Mintairov, J

    A. Mintairov, J. Merz, A. Osinsky, V. Fuflyigin, and L. D. Zhu, Infra red spectroscopy of ZnSiN 2 single-crystalline films on r-sapphire, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2517 (2000)

    2000

  82. [95]

    C. M. Fang, R. A. de Groot, R. J. Bruls, H. T. Hintzen, and G. de Wit h, Ab initio band structure calculations of Mg 3N2 and MgSiN 2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 4833 (1999)

    1999

  83. [96]

    W. A. Groen, M. J. Kraan, and G. de With, Preparation, microstructure , and properties of MgSiN 2 ceramics, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 12, 413 (1993)

    1993

  84. [97]

    Kageyama, K

    S. Kageyama, K. Okamoto, S. Yasuoka, K. Ide, K. Hanzawa, Y. Hi ranaga, P. Hsieh, S. Hazra, A. Suceava, A. Saha, H. Yokota, K. Shigematsu, M. Azuma, V. Gopalan, H. Uchida, H. Hiramatsu, and H. Funakubo, Realization of non-equilibrium wurtzite structure in heterovalent ternary M...

    2025

  85. [98]

    Misaki, A

    T. Misaki, A. Wakahara, H. Okada, and A. Yoshida, Optical prope rties of ZnGeN 2 epitaxial layer, Phys. Status Solidi C 0, 2890 (2003)

    2003

  86. [99]

    P. D. Bhuyan, D. Singh, S. Kansara, P. Yadav, S. K. Gupta1, Y. Sonv ane, S. K. Rout, and E. Sinha, Experimental and theoretical analysis of electronic and optical properties of Mg WO4, J. Mater. Sci. 52, 4934 (2017)

    2017

  87. [100]

    Giannozzi et al

    P. Giannozzi et al. , QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  88. [101]

    Giannozzi et al

    P. Giannozzi et al. , Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with QUANTUM ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  89. [102]

    Giannozzi et al

    P. Giannozzi et al. , Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 154105 (2020)

    2020

  90. [103]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  91. [104]

    G. Yang, H. Wang, S. Mu, H. Xie, T. Wang, C. He, M. Shen, M. Liu, C . G. V. de Walle, and H. X. Tang, Unveiling the Pockels coefficient of ferroelectric nitride ScAlN, Nat. Commun. 15, 9538 (2024)

    2024

  92. [105]

    Y. Wen, H. Chen, Z. Wu, W. Li, and Y. Zhang, Fabrication and phot onic applications of Si-integrated LiNbO 3 and BaTiO 3 ferroelectric thin films, APL Mater. 12, 020601 (2024)

    2024

  93. [106]

    M. D. Johannes, I. I. Mazin, and D. S. Parker, Effect of doping and pre ssure on magnetism and lattice structure of iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 82, 024527 (2010)

    2010

  94. [107]

    K. D. Belashchenko and V. P. Antropov, Role of covalent Fe-As bo nding in the magnetic moment formation and exchange mechanisms in iron-pnictide superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 78, 212505 (2008)

    2008

  95. [108]

    Fichtner, N

    S. Fichtner, N. Wolff, F. Lofink, L. Kienle, and B. Wagner, AlScN: A III-V semiconductor based ferroelectric, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 114103 (2019)

    2019

  96. [109]

    C.-W. Lee, N. U. Din, K. Yazawa, G. L. Brennecka, A. Zakutayev, a nd P. Gorai, Emerging materials and design principles for wurtzite-type ferroelectrics, Matter 7, 1644 (2024)

    2024

  97. [110]

    Fichtner, G

    S. Fichtner, G. Sch¨ onweger, C.-W. Lee, Keisuke, P. Gorai, and G . L. Brennecka, Polarization and domains in wurtzite ferroelectrics: Fundamentals and applications, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 021310 (2025)

    2025

  98. [111]

    L.-D. Yuan, A. B. Georgescu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonrelativis tic spin splitting at the Brillouin zone center in compensate d magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216701 (2024)

    2024

  99. [112]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, an d Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  100. [113]

    A. Urru, D. Seleznev, Y. Teng, S. Y. Park, S. E. Reyes-Lillo, and K. M. Rabe, G-type antiferromagnetic BiFeO 3 is a multiferroic g-wave altermagnet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18965 10.48550/arXiv.2505.18965 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.