Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Earth-like tides cap Earth-twin moons at two Moon-sized satellites

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:27 UTC pith:HFAVW7QH

load-bearing objection Competently run tides-plus-N-body stability study whose 'up to N moons' headline slightly oversells what was actually simulated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14323 v1 pith:HFAVW7QH submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.EP

Tidal evolution of packed moon systems around an Earth-mass planet

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords exomoonstidal dissipationpacked moon systemsmean-motion resonancesmutual Hill spacingEarth-mass exoplanetslong-term orbital stabilityconstant time-lag tides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Working with N-body simulations that add tidal forces to the usual gravitational interactions, this paper asks how many equal-mass moons an Earth-mass planet can retain in a tightly packed configuration. The central result is that tides—not gravitational packing alone—set the ceiling: an Earth-mass planet can stably host at most two Moon-mass moons, three Pluto-mass moons, or five Ceres-mass moons, and under Earth-like dissipation these survive only in narrow bands of orbital spacing. The controlling mechanism is tidal migration: the inner moon drifts outward faster than its neighbors, sweeping the system through mean-motion resonances that pump up eccentricity and end in scattering or collision. The paper concludes that long-lived multi-moon systems around terrestrial planets are possible, but require tidal dissipation weaker than the present Earth-Moon system's, which matters for predicting what exomoon architectures transit surveys might find.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the maximum number of moons an Earth-mass planet can hold is not a purely gravitational property but a function of tidal dissipation rate. Modeling the planet as an Earth analog with a 6-hour spin and Love number 0.298, and adopting a constant-time-lag tide with time lag 698 seconds (Earth-like), the simulations find that two Moon-mass moons survive to 10^7 innermost orbits only when their mutual Hill spacing lies between 7 and 8.7; three Pluto-mass moons survive only for spacing between 8 and 9.7; and five Ceres-mass moons survive only in narrow islands near a spacing of about 12.2. With no tides or weak tides, the stable windows are wider. Th

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two coupled objects: the mutual Hill spacing parameter that sets the initial orbital separations, defined as the orbital separation normalized by the mutual Hill radius, and the constant-time-lag tidal model whose time lag controls the outward migration speed. The specific mechanism is resonance sweeping—the faster-migrating inner moon drives the system through mean-motion resonances, whose locations are predicted from the period ratio of adjacent moons, exciting eccentricity until a moon crosses the Roche limit, escapes, or is pushed beyond 0.4 Hill radius, each of which defines an instability in the simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The constant-time-lag tidal model with a fixed time lag, Earth-like Love number, and a 6-hour initial spin is assumed to give quantitatively correct migration speeds and resonance-sweeping behavior; if the real tidal response of rocky planets is frequency-dependent or these parameters are unrepresentative, the predicted stability windows and maximum moon counts would shift.

What would settle it

Repeat the same packed-system grid using a frequency-dependent tidal model (e.g., viscoelastic or Andrade rheology) at Earth-like dissipation and check whether two Moon-mass moons still become unstable at mutual Hill spacing between 5 and 7 within 10^7 orbits; if such systems survive, the claim that Earth-like tides cap the count at two is not robust. Alternatively, a future transit or TTV survey that finds a stable three-Moon-mass system around an Earth-mass planet with Earth-like parameters would directly contradict the maximum-count result.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, an Earth-mass exoplanet in a Sun-like star's habitable zone with Earth-like tidal dissipation can retain at most two Moon-mass moons; finding more would require either weaker tides or a different interior rheology.
  • The narrow stable spacing bands (e.g., mutual Hill spacing between 7 and 8.7 for two Moon-mass moons) give transit and TTV searches a concrete architectural target: moons that survive must sit in specific period-ratio windows near high-order mean-motion resonances.
  • The conclusion that billion-year survival requires tides weaker than today's Earth implies that ocean-bearing terrestrial planets are less likely to host packed moon systems than dry ones, because the present-day dissipation is largely driven by shallow-ocean bottom friction.
  • The resonance-sweeping mechanism means that any packed moon system is transient on tidal timescales: even systems that are stable now will eventually cross resonances and may destabilize, so observations catch them in a finite window of orbital spacing.
  • The maximum counts scale inversely with moon mass—two Moon-mass, three Pluto-mass, five Ceres-mass—so lower-mass moons allow more companions; the same simulation framework can be extended to predict limits for other moon masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the real tidal response of a rocky planet is frequency-dependent rather than a constant time lag, the predicted stability windows are likely to shift; repeating the same spacing-dissipation grid with a viscoelastic or Andrade rheology would show whether the qualitative ceiling (tides reduce maximum counts) survives.
  • The simulations treat moons as equal-mass, coplanar, and circular; mixed-mass or inclined moon populations could pack differently, so the numbers two, three, and five are architecture-dependent ceilings rather than universal limits.
  • The 10^7-orbit baseline is far shorter than gigayear timescales; systems inside the 'stable' windows may still eventually destabilize via slow chaotic diffusion, so the true long-term counts could be lower than the paper's headline numbers.
  • The predicted narrow spacing bands could be tested indirectly through exomoon transit-timing variations: a packed system should show moon-moon interaction signatures consistent with resonances at specific period ratios, distinguishing it from a single moon or stellar activity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses REBOUND/IAS15 with the REBOUNDx tides_spin module to simulate packed systems of equal-mass moons around an Earth-mass planet at 1 au under the constant-time-lag (CTL) tidal model. For two Luna-mass, three Pluto-mass, and five Ceres-mass moons, the authors vary the mutual-Hill spacing β and the tidal time lag τ (0, 100, and 698 s) and integrate for up to 10^7 innermost-moon orbits. They identify narrow β windows in which the simulated systems survive, validate their tidal implementation against the Barnes (2017) secular model for a single moon, and conclude that tidal dissipation reduces the maximum number of stable moons around an Earth-mass planet to two Luna-mass, three Pluto-mass, or five Ceres-mass moons.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this would be a useful constraint on exomoon architectures around terrestrial planets, complementing the tide-free packing results of Satyal et al. (2022). The paper has concrete strengths: the numerical setup is standard and reproducible, the code and data are publicly archived, the β scans are systematic, and the validation against an independent secular tidal model (Figure 1) is a genuine check. However, the headline 'at most N moons' statement is not actually tested by the simulations, and the integration time is short relative to the billion-year timescale invoked in the abstract. The useful core result — that the specifically simulated N-moon systems can survive in restricted spacing bands under Earth-like dissipation — is defensible but should be reported with appropriate qualifiers.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3 and Abstract] The headline conclusion 'an Earth-mass planet can stably host up to two Luna-mass moons, three Pluto-mass moons, or five Ceres-mass moons' is not directly supported by the simulations. In §2.3 the initial number of moons is set to exactly N=2,3,5 because Satyal et al. (2022) estimated tide-free maxima of 3±1, 4±1, 7±1; no run places N+1 moons in the system. An upper bound requires showing that N+1 (and larger) systems are unstable over the sampled β and τ grid. The current runs demonstrate that two Luna-mass moons can survive in 7≤β≤8.7 for τ=698 s (Figure 2c), but not that a third Luna-mass moon cannot survive in some narrow, untested β window. Please add N+1 simulations for the Earth-like τ=698 s case (and ideally for τ=100 s), or explicitly revise all 'at most' statements to 'the N-moon systems we simulated survive in the sampled β windows'.
  2. [Abstract; §2.1; §4] The simulations are integrated for 10^7 orbits of the innermost moon (§2.1). For a Luna-mass moon starting at 2 R_Roche around an Earth-mass planet, this is roughly 2×10^4 yr, not the 'billion-year timescales' invoked in the abstract and §4. The statement 'for these architectures to exist on billion-year timescales, tides must be weaker than those of the present-day Earth-Moon system' is therefore an extrapolation, not a result of the integrations. Either provide a quantitative migration-timescale argument connecting survival for 10^7 P1 to Gyr survival, or soften the abstract and conclusions to say that the simulated survival is demonstrated only over the integration window.
  3. [§2.4 and Figs. 2–4] The quantitative stability windows and maximum-count numbers are produced by the CTL tides_spin model with fixed τ and Earth-like k2=0.298, normalized moment of inertia, obliquity, and 6-hour spin. Because the operative mechanism is resonance sweeping during outward tidal migration, the claimed upper limits are sensitive to the speed and frequency dependence of tidal dissipation. The manuscript acknowledges in §2.4 that exoplanet tides may be weaker than Earth's, but the abstract and conclusions present the maximum counts as general architecture constraints. I recommend adding a sensitivity test (e.g., varying k2 or the initial spin period by a factor of 2–3 for a subset of β, or comparing with a frequency-dependent tidal model) and, absent such a test, explicitly restricting the claims to the CTL Earth-like scenarios.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] The sentence 'we see an anticorrelation between eccentricity of the two moons' is not demonstrated by a quantitative measure; please specify which panel of Figure 2e supports this and consider adding a correlation coefficient or a clear annotation.
  2. [Figures 2–4] The captions say lifetimes are 'with respect to the innermost orbit P1', but the text sometimes says 'dynamical orbits of the innermost moon'. Define P1 explicitly as the initial orbital period of the innermost moon, and state the conversion to physical years for at least the Luna case.
  3. [§3.1 and §3.2] The stable ranges quoted in the text (e.g., '6≤β≤8.6' for τ=100 s) should be described as 'the sampled intervals in which systems survived to the integration end', since the β step is 0.01 and initial phases are fixed.
  4. [Section 5] The data availability statement says the software is 'archived at Moon Packing' without a DOI or archive identifier; please provide a persistent identifier or clear repository link.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Headline capacity numbers are chosen, not measured: 'up to N' traces to the self-cited Satyal input N, with no N+1 runs.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Section 2.3; Sections 3.1–3.3]
    "To constrain the initial number of moons, we follow Satyal et al. (2022), where they found an Earth-mass planet can host up to 7±1 Ceres-mass, 4±1 Pluto-mass, and 3±1 Luna-mass moons without tides. Therefore, we examine systems with five Ceres-mass moons, three Pluto-mass moons, and two Luna-mass moons. ... We find that an Earth-mass planet can stably host up to two Luna-mass moons, three Pluto-mass moons, or five Ceres-mass moons."

    The claimed upper bounds (2/3/5) are exactly the N-values placed in the initial conditions, and those N-values were taken from the authors' own prior paper (Satyal et al. 2022, sharing two co-authors) rather than from any tidal simulation. The paper never integrates a third Luna-mass, fourth Pluto-mass, or sixth Ceres-mass moon, so the 'at most' phrasing has no measured ceiling; it is the selected grid maximum. The 'tides reduce the maximum count' conclusion therefore inherits its capacity numbers from the self-cited pure-gravity estimate minus a margin, instead of being derived from the tidal simulations. This is load-bearing for the headline claim, even though the β–lifetime maps themselves are direct simulation outputs.

full rationale

No parameter is fitted to make the stability maps come out as they do: τ, k2, the moment of inertia, and the initial spin are fixed literature/assumption values, and the β–lifetime diagrams are direct outputs of the REBOUND/REBOUNDx integration. The validation against the Barnes (2017) secular CTL model is an independent check, and the individual survival windows for two Luna, three Pluto, and five Ceres moons are genuine simulation content. The circularity is confined to the abstract's 'up to' language: the maximum counts are the N-values chosen from a self-cited predecessor paper (Satyal et al. 2022, two shared authors), and no larger-N tidal systems were simulated to establish that the ceiling is real. Thus the capacity claim is partially inherited from the input rather than fully derived from the new simulations, while the core finding that tides narrow the stable spacing regions remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard gravitational N-body integration plus a constant-time-lag tidal model with literature/assumed dissipation parameters. No new entities are introduced. The free parameters are hand-chosen scenarios (τ values, initial spin, integration resolution). The strongest prior-inherited input is the Satyal et al. (2022) pure-gravity baseline, which sets the moon counts chosen for simulation.

free parameters (3)
  • tidal time lag τ scenarios = 0 s, 100 s, 698 s
    Sets the dissipation/migration rate in the CTL model (§2.4). τ=698 s is the Earth-Moon value from the tidal literature (not cited in-text), τ=100 s is a hand-chosen 'weak tides' intermediate, τ=0 disables tides. The stable-window locations depend on these choices.
  • initial planet spin period = 6 hours
    Eq. (8) initializes Ω0 with P=6 h, a faster-than-present-Earth spin assumed for the young planet. Tidal torque scales with (Ω−n), so this assumption directly affects migration speed and resonance sweeping; no slower/faster spin runs are shown.
  • β sampling step = 0.01 (0.001 in zoomed regions)
    Grid resolution over the spacing parameter. The paper acknowledges (§2.3) that the 0.01 step 'may hinder very narrow regions of stability,' so boundary values like 7≤β≤8.7 are resolution-dependent.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Constant-time-lag equilibrium tide model (Hut 1981; Eggleton et al. 1998; Leconte et al. 2010) correctly describes tidal torque and orbital migration for close-in moons over 10^7 orbits
    Invoked in §2.4 to justify tides_spin; the paper validates only a single-moon Earth-Moon analog against Barnes (2017) for 3×10^4 yr, not the packed multi-moon regime.
  • domain assumption Earth-like planetary properties (R⊕, ρ⊕, k2=0.298, Ĉ=0.3308, obliquity 23.44°, thin negligible atmosphere) represent an Earth-mass exoplanet
    Applied throughout §2.1 and §2.4; the conclusions about 'Earth-mass planets' inherit this parameter choice.
  • domain assumption Outer stability limit of 0.4 RH (Domingos et al. 2006; Rosario-Franco et al. 2020) is the correct moon-loss boundary
    Used as stopping condition (iii) in §2.2 and to set a_N for βmax in Eq. (5); a different limit (0.5 RH) would shift βmax and the outer windows.
  • standard math Fluid Roche limit (Eq. 1) with Earth-like densities defines the disruption boundary
    Standard celestial-mechanics result; used to set a1 = 2 RRoche and the close-encounter stopping condition, §2.2.
  • domain assumption IAS15 with initial timestep 5% of P at 1.8 RRoche resolves the dynamics
    §2.1: resolution choice 'to maintain consistency with prior work'; relies on Holman et al. (2023) benchmarks rather than convergence tests here.
  • domain assumption Golden-ratio initial phases (Eq. 6) prevent resonance bias in initial conditions
    Standard practice from Smith & Lissauer (2009), Quarles & Lissauer (2018); a finite set of phases means narrow resonance-locked regions could be missed.
  • domain assumption Moon formation starts moons at a1 = 2 RRoche on circular coplanar orbits; equal masses per category
    §2.3 and Table 1: a convenient near-inner-edge location 'motivated by impact-generated disk models'; the paper explicitly does not test other formation radii or unequal masses.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16113 in / 21249 out tokens · 201526 ms · 2026-08-02T02:27:22.810013+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

While missions have long targeted terrestrial exoplanets within the habitable zone of their host stars, the number of exomoon candidates is expected to grow as next generation space-based observatories achieve the photometric sensitivity required to detect their transit signals. Constraining the stability limits of tightly packed moon systems is therefore essential for transit searches and predicting the number of moons around terrestrial planets. In our Solar System, only three moons orbit the terrestrial planets, motivating the question of whether Earth-mass exoplanet systems can sustain long-lived, tightly packed satellites. We investigate the stability limits of an Earth-mass planet orbiting a Sun-mass star, where the planet hosts multiple moons. We use the REBOUND N-body integrator along with the tides_spin module in REBOUNDx to assess the stability of tightly packed systems of Luna-, Pluto-, and Ceres-mass moons across a range of tidal dissipation parameters, up to $10^{7}$ dynamical orbits of the innermost moon. We find that an Earth-mass planet can stably host up to two Luna-mass moons, three Pluto-mass moons, or five Ceres-mass moons. Under Earth-like dissipation, the Luna, Pluto, and Ceres packed systems survive within narrow regions of orbital spacing. These results imply that long-lived multi-moon systems around Earth-mass planets are possible but strongly depend on tidal dissipation; for these architectures to exist on billion-year timescales, tides must be weaker than those of the present-day Earth-Moon system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14323 by Alan Brise\~no, Billy Quarles, Marialis Rosario-Franco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of the semimajor axis a in terms of the Hill radius (RH), the eccentricity esat, and the spin rate of the planet Ωspin using the REBOUNDx and a secular tidal evolution model (Barnes 2017). moons without tides (τ = 0 s; Figure 2a) is in￾sensitive to β until βmax is reached. For initial β near the critical value of βmax, the outer moon experiences strong perturbations from the Sun that propagate on… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The lifetime of the system with respect to the innermost orbit P1 is plotted on a logarithmic scale for two Luna-mass moons. Alongside the maximum eccentricity reached by each moon is plotted (color-coded). The black-dashed line marks the βmax calculated earlier in the Eqn. (5). The gray dashed lines and labels indicate the MMR locations predicted using Eqn. (15). 6.5. Then the moon–moon interactions are l… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The short-term orbital evolution of two Luna-mass moons (τ = 698 s) separated by a factor β relative to the planetary host, where the orbital distances are scaled relative to the Hill radius (RH). Panels (a), (d), (g), (j) show the orbital evolution (starting with β = 4.4) with respect to the Cartesian coordinates, semimajor axis a(RH), eccentricity e, and the period ratio pi+1 pi , respectively. Panels (b… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Logarithmic difference between the maximum and minimum eccentricity (log10 ∆e) for a system with two Luna-mass moons simulated for 105 orbits of the innermost moon P1. These maps vary the initial eccentricity e0 and the spacing parameter β. Panels (a), (c), and (e) in the left column represent the results for the innermost moon when τ is 0 s, 100 s, and 698 s, respectively while panels (b), (d), and (f) in… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Secular Orbit Evolution in Systems with a Strong External Perturber - A Simple and Accurate Model. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/4/148 , archivePrefix =. 1701.03425 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    , year = 1996, month = feb, volume =

    The Stability of Multi-Planet Systems. , year = 1996, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0019 , adsurl =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Stable satellites around extrasolar giant planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11104.x , adsurl =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    ASSIST: An Ephemeris-quality Test-particle Integrator. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/PSJ/acc9a9 , archivePrefix =. 2303.16246 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Tidal evolution in close binary systems. , keywords =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Is tidal heating sufficient to explain bloated exoplanets? Consistent calculations accounting for finite initial eccentricity. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014337 , archivePrefix =. 1004.0463 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Self-consistent Spin, Tidal, and Dynamical Equations of Motion in the REBOUNDx Framework. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc06d , archivePrefix =. 2303.00006 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    TRACE: a code for time-reversible astrophysical close encounters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1982 , archivePrefix =. 2405.03800 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Numerical Modeling of the Disruption of Comet D/1993 F2 Shoemaker-Levy 9 Representing the Progenitor by a Gravitationally Bound Assemblage of Randomly Shaped Polyhedra. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/93 , archivePrefix =. 1207.3386 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    The stability of tightly-packed, evenly-spaced systems of Earth-mass planets orbiting a Sun-like star. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.04.010 , archivePrefix =. 1703.08426 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Long-term Stability of Tightly Packed Multi-planet Systems in Prograde, Coplanar, Circumstellar Orbits within the Centauri AB System. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa966 , archivePrefix =. 1801.06131 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Exomoons in Systems with a Strong Perturber: Applications to Cen AB. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac042a , archivePrefix =. 2105.00034 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 , archivePrefix =. 1110.4876 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    IAS15: a fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2164 , archivePrefix =. 1409.4779 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Orbital Stability of Exomoons and Submoons with Applications to Kepler 1625b-I. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab89a7 , archivePrefix =. 2005.06521 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Moon packing around an Earth-mass planet. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2172 , archivePrefix =. 2208.03604 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    , year = 2009, month = may, volume =

    Orbital stability of systems of closely-spaced planets. , year = 2009, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.12.027 , adsurl =

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    REBOUNDx: a library for adding conservative and dissipative forces to otherwise symplectic N-body integrations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2870 , archivePrefix =. 1908.05634 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    The resonance overlap criterion and the onset of stochastic behavior in the restricted three-body problem. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/112778 , adsurl =

  20. [20]

    Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , keywords =

    Tidal locking of habitable exoplanets. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10569-017-9783-7 , archivePrefix =. 1708.02981 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Dynamics of Systems of Two Close Planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1169 , adsurl =

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    First-order Resonance Overlap and the Stability of Close Two-planet Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/129 , archivePrefix =. 1307.8119 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    A Criterion for the Onset of Chaos in Compact, Eccentric Multiplanet Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac1c6a , archivePrefix =. 2106.14863 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Resonance Overlap Is Responsible for Ejecting Planets in Binary Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/499347 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0511710 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Three-body resonance overlap in closely spaced multiple-planet systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19555.x , archivePrefix =. 1106.0156 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Resonance locking in giant planets indicated by the rapid orbital expansion of Titan. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1120-5 , archivePrefix =. 2006.06854 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Detecting Extrasolar Moons Akin to Solar System Satellites with an Orbital Sampling Effect. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/14 , archivePrefix =. 1403.5839 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    Science Advances , keywords =

    Evidence for a large exomoon orbiting Kepler-1625b. Science Advances , keywords =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav1784 , archivePrefix =. 1810.02362 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    An exomoon survey of 70 cool giant exoplanets and the new candidate Kepler-1708 b-i. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01539-1 , archivePrefix =. 2201.04643 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Exomoon candidates from transit timing variations: eight Kepler systems with TTVs explainable by photometrically unseen exomoons. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3743 , archivePrefix =. 2006.12997 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Astrometric Methods for Detecting Exomoons Orbiting Imaged Exoplanets: Prospects for Detecting Moons Orbiting a Giant Planet in Centauri A's Habitable Zone. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0741 , archivePrefix =. 2509.13513 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    doi:10.17226/26141 , year =

    Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s , isbn =. doi:10.17226/26141 , year =

  33. [33]

    Exomoons and Exorings with the Habitable Worlds Observatory. I. On the Detection of Earth Moon Analog Shadows and Eclipses. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad4a75 , archivePrefix =. 2405.02408 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Exomoon search with VLTI/GRAVITY around the substellar companion HD 206893 B. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557127 , archivePrefix =. 2511.20091 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =

    Predicting the long-term stability of compact multiplanet systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2001258117 , archivePrefix =. 2007.06521 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Enhanced Stability in Planetary Systems with Similar Masses. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad9388 , archivePrefix =. 2411.09194 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The path to instability in compact multi-planetary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038764 , archivePrefix =. 2006.14903 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    A Machine Learns to Predict the Stability of Tightly Packed Planetary Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/2/L22 , archivePrefix =. 1610.05359 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Stability of Satellites in Closely Packed Planetary Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L44 , archivePrefix =. 1308.4402 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#225 , year = 2015, series =

    The orbital dynamics and long-term stability of planetary systems. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#225 , year = 2015, series =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Stable lifetime of compact, evenly spaced planetary systems with non-equal masses. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad393 , archivePrefix =. 2206.11374 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Kepler Multi-planet Systems Exhibit Unexpected Intra-system Uniformity in Mass and Radius. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9714 , archivePrefix =. 1710.11152 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =

    RV-detected Kepler-multi Analogs Exhibit Intra-system Mass Uniformity. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aa9be5 , archivePrefix =. 1711.06567 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    The California-Kepler Survey. V. Peas in a Pod: Planets in a Kepler Multi-planet System Are Similar in Size and Regularly Spaced. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9ff6 , archivePrefix =. 1706.06204 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Generalized Peas in a Pod: Extending Intra-system Mass Uniformity to Non-TTV Systems via the Gini Index. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7562 , archivePrefix =. 2206.00053 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    The similarity of multi-planet systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142110 , adsurl =

  47. [47]

    American Journal of Mathematics , year =

    Hill, George William , title =. American Journal of Mathematics , year =. doi:10.2307/2369430 , url =

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    The Equilibrium Tide Model for Tidal Friction. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305670 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9801246 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The JWST Search for Earth-Luna Analogs: Upper Limits on Exomoons and Refined Ephemerides for TOI 700 d and e. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.05235 , archivePrefix =. 2604.05235 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Polarized Signatures of the Earth Through Time: An Outlook for the Habitable Worlds Observatory. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc09c , archivePrefix =. 2410.02194 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#245 , year = 2025, series =

    Continuous Habitable Zone Predictions for Habitable Worlds Observatory Targets. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#245 , year = 2025, series =

  52. [52]

    , year = 2006, month = jun, volume =

    A common mass scaling for satellite systems of gaseous planets. , year = 2006, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1038/nature04860 , adsurl =

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Formation of Giant Planet Satellites. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8937 , archivePrefix =. 2005.08330 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Capture of Irregular Satellites during Planetary Encounters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/512850 , adsurl =

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Irregular Satellites in the Context of Planet Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-1965-z , adsurl =

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Gas drag in primordial circumplanetary envelopes: A mechanism for satellite capture. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90016-2 , adsurl =

  57. [57]

    doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174817 , adsurl =

    Solar System Dynamics. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174817 , adsurl =

  58. [58]

    Science , keywords =

    Formation of Regular Satellites from Ancient Massive Rings in the Solar System. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1226477 , archivePrefix =. 1301.3808 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    A Search for Exoplanet Satellites that are the Same Size as the Earth's Moon

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Seven temperate terrestrial planets around the nearby ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature21360 , archivePrefix =. 1703.01424 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Stability of exomoons around the Kepler transiting circumbinary planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2117 , archivePrefix =. 1806.06075 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Habitability of Earth-mass Planets and Moons in the Kepler-16 System. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/14 , archivePrefix =. 1201.2302 , primaryClass =

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Simple tools to study global dynamics in non-axisymmetric galactic potentials - I. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:2000108 , adsurl =

  64. [64]

    Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena , year = 2003, month = aug, volume =

    Phase space structure of multi-dimensional systems by means of the mean exponential growth factor of nearby orbits. Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena , year = 2003, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(03)00103-9 , adsurl =

  65. [65]

    2026 , note =

    Planetary Satellite Discovery Circumstances , howpublished =. 2026 , note =

  66. [66]

    , year = 2000, month = jun, volume =

    Significant dissipation of tidal energy in the deep ocean inferred from satellite altimeter data. , year = 2000, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1038/35015531 , adsurl =

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    A Deep Search for Exomoons around WISE 0855 with JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae17ca , archivePrefix =. 2510.24575 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    The exomoon corridor for multiple moon systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1840 , archivePrefix =. 2106.13421 , primaryClass =

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    The exomoon corridor: Half of all exomoons exhibit TTV frequencies within a narrow window due to aliasing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3398 , archivePrefix =. 2012.00764 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    A search for transit timing variations within the exomoon corridor using Kepler data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3360 , archivePrefix =. 2211.06210 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Not-so-fast Kepler-1513: a perturbing planetary interloper in the exomoon corridor. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3070 , archivePrefix =. 2310.03802 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    , year = 1997, month = sep, volume =

    Lunar accretion from an impact-generated disk. , year = 1997, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1038/38669 , adsurl =

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Lunar Accretion from a Roche-interior Fluid Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/83 , archivePrefix =. 1210.0932 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    Science , keywords =

    Forming a Moon with an Earth-like Composition via a Giant Impact. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1226073 , adsurl =

  75. [75]

    Nature Geoscience , keywords =

    A multiple-impact origin for the Moon. Nature Geoscience , keywords =. doi:10.1038/ngeo2866 , archivePrefix =. 1903.02525 , primaryClass =

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    The Role of Multiple Giant Impacts in the Formation of the Earth-Moon System. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaca2d , archivePrefix =. 1806.00506 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    , year = 2004, month = sep, volume =

    Dynamics of Lunar Formation. , year = 2004, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082201.113457 , adsurl =

  78. [78]

    Nature Communications , keywords =

    Large planets may not form fractionally large moons. Nature Communications , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28063-8 , archivePrefix =. 2312.15050 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Circumplanetary Disk Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1168 , adsurl =

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Dynamics of Protoplanetary Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102521 , archivePrefix =. 1011.1496 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.