Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is Quantum Gravity Necessary?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0803.3456 v1 pith:HX5O654D submitted 2008-03-24 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords classical-quantumgravitypossibilityquestionargumentsclassicalconclusiveconsider
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In view of the enormous difficulties we seem to face in quantizing general relativity, we should perhaps consider the possibility that gravity is a fundamentally classical interaction. Theoretical arguments against such mixed classical-quantum models are strong, but not conclusive, and the question is ultimately one for experiment. I review some work in progress on the possibility of experimental tests, exploiting the nonlinearity of the classical-quantum coupling, that could help settle this question.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Salecker-Wigner-Karolyhazy Gedankenexperiment in light of the self-gravity

    gr-qc 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A heuristic argument that a clock's own gravity stops its wave-packet from spreading, reducing the minimum length-measurement uncertainty from the Karolyhazy scale l_P^(2/3) l^(1/3) to the Planck length.

Pith tools