Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper completes the 4PM first-order self-force radiated angular momentum to 7PN accuracy and uses it to give the 5PM radiation-reacted scattering angle for a point mass scattered by a Schwarzschild black hole.

desk verdict Completes the 4PM-1SF radiated angular momentum to 7PN with new odd-p∞ terms, but the derivation of the Hadamard finite parts is under-disclosed; still worth a referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03442 v1 pith:HYEBXAA2 submitted 2025-07-04 gr-qc

Andrea Geralico This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1083C35 PACS 04.30.-w04.25.Nx04.70.-s
keywords gravitationalself-forcepost-Minkowskianexpansionpost-NewtonianSchwarzschildblackholescatteringradiatedangularmomentumTeukolskyequationradiationreactionhyperbolicorbits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper computes, in first-order self-force theory, the gravitational-wave energy and angular momentum radiated when a small mass is scattered by a Schwarzschild black hole on a hyperbolic orbit. Both losses are obtained as combined post-Minkowskian (expansion in inverse dimensionless angular momentum $1/j$) and post-Newtonian (expansion in small velocity $p_\infty$) series, reaching $O(G^5)$ for the energy, $O(G^4)$ for the angular momentum, and 7PN accuracy for both. The central new result is the completion of the 4PM radiated angular momentum: only the even powers of $p_\infty$ were previously known from amplitude-based methods, and this work supplies the odd powers that were missing. With the full $J_4$ in hand, the paper derives the 5PM first-order self-force contribution to the radiation-reacted scattering angle.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through the Teukolsky formalism for the perturbed Weyl scalar $\psi_4$. The source amplitudes are built from low-frequency analytic solutions of the homogeneous radial equation, and for unbound orbits the Fourier integral over the continuous frequency spectrum is performed before the time integral. Powers of $\omega$ become delta-function derivatives, while logarithmic factors $\ln^k \omega$ produce the distributional identity (34); the leftover divergent integrals (35) are defined by their Hadamard finite part. This finite-part step is what converts the formal flux integrals into definite PM-PN coefficients and is the mechanism that turns the new odd-power $J_4$ terms into concrete numbers.

What would settle it

Compute the low-velocity limit of the 4PM radiated angular momentum with an independent regulator, for instance a numerical Teukolsky evolution of the unbound orbit with a small frequency cutoff, and extract the coefficients of $p_\infty^9$ and $p_\infty^{11}$ in $J_4$. If they disagree with Eq. (38), the Hadamard finite-part prescription is not the right physical definition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that the 4PM first-order self-force radiated angular momentum $J_4$ is now known completely to 7PN: the even powers of $p_\infty$ in Eq. (38) reproduce the exact amplitude-based expression, while the odd powers are new. This fills the gap left by previous work, where only the even-velocity part of $J_4$ was available. The completed $J_4$, together with the $O(G^5)$ energy $E_5$ that agrees with the recent exact result, then determines the 5PM radiation-reacted scattering angle, Eq. (40), which is offered as a cross-check for independent 5PM calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that evaluating the divergent frequency integrals by Hadamard finite parts gives the physically correct radiation reaction; if that premise fails, the new odd-power terms of $J_4$ fail with it even though the even-power terms and the 5PM energy still match independent results.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 4PM radiated angular momentum is now complete through 7PN, including the new odd powers of $p_\infty$ that previous amplitude-based results lacked.
  • The 5PM radiation-reacted scattering angle coefficient in Eq. (40) provides a closed-form target against which ongoing 5PM calculations using other techniques can be checked.
  • The 5PM energy result agrees with the exact $O(G^5)$ result through 7PN, providing an independent confirmation of both calculations in a regime where no exact answer was previously available for angular momentum.
  • The radiative-loss coefficients are gauge invariant, so the completed $J_4$ can be used directly in balance-law constructions of the conservative dynamics without gauge fixing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the cleanest test of the new $J_4$ odd-power terms is a direct numerical evaluation of the unbound-orbit flux with an independent regulator; the coefficients of $p_\infty^9$ and $p_\infty^{11}$ are sharp discriminants.
  • The same frequency-first pipeline should extend to higher orders, with Eq. (34) showing that integrals with $k>1$ will introduce multiple polylogarithms starting at 6PM for energy and 5PM for angular momentum, making the structure of the next coefficients foreseeable.
  • A completed $J_4$ also supplies a missing input for resummed models of two-body dynamics that need the full 4PM dissipative loss rather than an even-velocity-only approximation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes, in first-order self-force theory, the gravitational-wave energy and angular momentum radiated by a point mass on a hyperbolic orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole, using the Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi analytic solutions and a continuous-frequency Fourier reconstruction. The results are presented as combined post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian expansions: the 5PM energy E5 through 7PN, agreeing with the independent exact result of Driesse et al.; the 4PM angular momentum J4 through 7PN, with even powers of p_infty agreeing with Heissenberg and odd powers claimed as new; and a derived 5PM radiation-reacted scattering angle. The central new claim is the completion of the odd-power part of J4, and this is the part of the paper that is not backed by any external check.

Significance. If correct, the paper would complete the 4PM radiated angular momentum for unbound Schwarzschild orbits to 7PN and provide a new 5PM radiation-reaction observable, while independently confirming the recent exact 5PM energy result. The cross-checks are genuine and non-circular: Eq. (37) is compared with the small-velocity expansion of Ref. [38], and the even powers of Eq. (38) are compared with the exact expression of Ref. [48]. These checks support the reliability of the MST-based pipeline inherited from Ref. [44]. However, the genuinely new odd-power coefficients in Eq. (38) are not independently verified and their derivation is not shown; the significance of the paper therefore hinges on a single regularization step in Section III whose treatment is asserted rather than demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (34)-(35)] The load-bearing step of the calculation is the treatment of the continuous-spectrum frequency integrals. The paper states in Eq. (34) that integrals of the type ∫(dω/2π)e^{iω(t'-t)}ln^k ω produce a Heaviside term plus a δ(t'-t) boundary term with coefficients A_k and B_k, and in Eq. (35) that the consequent divergent integrals are evaluated by taking a Hadamard finite part. Neither the coefficients A_k and B_k nor the derivation of this distributional identity is given, and no unambiguous definition of the Hadamard finite part used for Eq. (35) is provided. Since the new odd-power terms in Eq. (38) are precisely the ones that depend on this step, and since the even-power agreement with Ref. [48] and the E5 agreement with Ref. [38] are insensitive to these specific coefficients, this is not a presentation issue but a missing justification for the central claim. Please supply the explicit distributional identity, the finite-part prescription, and either the derivation or a verifiable computation (e.g., explicit l,m multipole sums or an ancillary file) for the odd-p∞ terms.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (38)] The odd powers of p_infty in Eq. (38) are asserted as new without any intermediate expressions, multipole sums, or reproducibility material. The text says 'The remaining terms instead are new with this work,' but it does not show how they arise from the regularization of Eqs. (34)-(35). Given that these coefficients are the paper's main new result, their derivation is load-bearing. The agreement of E5 with Ref. [38] and of the even powers of J4 with Ref. [48] cannot serve as a check of these odd coefficients, because those observables weight the frequency integrands differently and do not exercise the odd-p∞ part of J4. The author should provide a derivation, a detailed technical appendix, or a reproducibility package that allows an independent audit of these terms.
  3. [Eqs. (22)-(23) and Section IV] The paper distinguishes between total radiated losses (including horizon absorption) and losses at infinity, and Eq. (23) correctly uses E∞_rad and L∞_rad for the scattering-angle contribution. This is consistent, but the reader is never told whether the fluxes computed in Section IV include only the infinity contribution or also some horizon piece. Since the expressions in Eqs. (37)-(38) are later used directly in Eq. (40), please state explicitly that the quoted E5 and J4 are fluxes at infinity only, not total fluxes, and clarify whether any horizon contribution was evaluated or neglected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1) and surrounding text] The definition of the inverse dimensionless angular momentum is garbled: the text has '1 j = Gm1m2 cJ', while the intended relation is 1/j = G m1 m2/(c J). The same applies to the sentence '1 j = GM h bp∞', which should be 1/j = G M h/(b p∞).
  2. [Section II, after Eq. (7)] The sentence 'where hatted quantities satisfying the normalization condition ofu' contains a typo: it should read 'of u' with a space. The surrounding grammatical construction is also difficult to parse and should be rewritten.
  3. [Eq. (34)] The notation H(x) for the Heaviside step function is introduced, but the expression A_k/(t'-t) H(t-t') is written without parentheses, which is visually ambiguous. Please clarify whether the factor H(t-t') multiplies the whole rational term, and state the precise argument (t-t' or t'-t) of H.
  4. [Abstract and Section IV] The abstract claims '7PN for both' energy and angular momentum, but the final displayed terms in Eqs. (37) and (38) are p^{16}_infty and p^{15}_infty, respectively. Please state explicitly which PN order each final term corresponds to, since the relation between power of p_infty and fractional PN order is not stated in the text for these two equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the new odd-power J4 terms are computed from the MST machinery and checked against independent external results; prior self-citations supply method, not the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central new claim is the odd-p∞ part of J4 in Eq. (38), with the even-p∞ part and E5 checked against the independent results of Refs. [38] and [48]. These external results are used as cross-checks after the fact, not as inputs to the MST calculation, and there are no fitted parameters. The load-bearing technical step is the treatment of continuous-spectrum log-frequency integrals, Eq. (34), and the Hadamard finite-part prescription for Eq. (35): 'Further integration over t′ of the first term leads to integrals of the type ... which diverge for t′ = t, and are evaluated by taking their Hadamard finite part.' This prescription is an analytic assumption and a possible correctness risk for the new odd-power terms, but it is not circular: it is a stated mathematical identity with an explicit form, cited to Ref. [44] (a prior paper including the author) and Ref. [57], and it does not assume the J4 result being derived. The self-citation to [44] supplies the frequency-domain integration strategy, not the final flux coefficients. No step reduces by construction to its inputs, no fitted quantity is renamed a prediction, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the author's own prior work. The derivation is therefore self-contained, with the usual caveat that the regularization prescription is not independently verified by the external benchmarks that are insensitive to the new odd-p∞ terms.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the expansions in p∞ and 1/j are physical variables. The derivation relies on standard domain assumptions of self-force theory, the Teukolsky/MST formalism, and a specific regularization of divergent integrals. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The point particle moves on a geodesic of the Schwarzschild background to first order in the mass ratio (self-force approximation).
    This is the 1SF limit assumed in the setup (Section II), necessary to compute fluxes as linear-in-ν quantities.
  • domain assumption The Teukolsky/MST low-frequency solutions provide a valid basis for unbound orbits with a continuous spectrum.
    Section III relies on the standard Teukolsky formalism and MST solutions; the paper states this is well established and cites Refs [54-56].
  • domain assumption Divergent integrals in the Fourier reconstruction are regularized by the Hadamard finite-part prescription.
    The paper states that integrals of the type (35) diverge at t′ = t and are evaluated by taking their Hadamard finite part; the correctness of the new J4 terms depends on this prescription.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HYEBXAA2

@misc{pith2026250703442,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HYEBXAA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03442}
}
abstract

The radiated energy and angular momentum from a point mass on a hyperbolic-like orbit about a Schwarzschild black hole are computed for the first time in the framework of the first-order self-force theory. The analytical expressions for the fluxes are obtained through the standard method of Mano, Suzuki and Takasugi in the form of combined post-Minkowskian (PM) and post-Newtonian (PN) expansions. The reached PM accuracy for the energy and angular momentum losses is $O(G^5)$ and $O(G^4)$, respectively, and 7PN for both. The radiative losses (energy, angular momentum and linear momentum) are currently known in PN-expanded form up to the (fractional) 3PN order [D. Bini et al., Phys. Rev. D \textbf{107}, 024012 (2023)]. Exact PM results valid for arbitrary values of the velocity are limited to $O(G^4)$ for the energy and $O(G^3)$ for the angular momentum. An exact expression for the radiated energy at $O(G^5)$ has been recently obtained in [M. Driesse et al., Nature \textbf{641}, 603-607 (2025)] in the first-order self force limit, whereas the $O(G^4)$ radiated angular momentum has been partially determined in [C. Heissenberg, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{111}, 126012 (2025)]. The results of this work are in agreement with the state of the art of both energy and angular momentum losses, also completing the knowledge of the 4PM radiated angular momentum up to the reached PN accuracy. The expressions for radiative losses are then used to get the 5PM radiation-reacted scattering angle, which should also serve as a cross-check of ongoing calculations by other methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational bremsstrahlung waveform at the eighth post-Minkowskian order in the extreme-mass-ratio limit

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    New high-order perturbative results for extreme-mass-ratio gravitational scattering waveforms, radiated angular momentum, and radiation-reaction deflection, claimed at eighth but explicitly computed to seventh post-Mi...

  2. High-post-Newtonian-order dynamical effects induced by tail-of-tail interactions in a two body system

    gr-qc 2025-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper derives 6.5PN tail-of-tail contributions to binary dynamics and finds agreement with independent self-force and worldline-EFT results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [38]

    Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch, “Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,” Nature 641, no.8063, 603-607 (2025) [arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [48]

    Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),

    C. Heissenberg, “Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.12, 126012 (2025) [arXiv:2501.02904 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [44]

    Post-Minkowskian self-force in the low-velocity limit: Scalar field scattering,

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound and D. Usseglio, “Post-Minkowskian self-force in the low-velocity limit: Scalar field scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.6, 6 (2024) [arXiv:2406.15878 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,

    L. Barack and A. Pound, “Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, no.1, 016904 (2019) [arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [2]

    Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,

    T. Damour, “Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no.10, 104015 (2016) [arXiv:1609.00354 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [3]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,

    T. Damour, “High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.4, 044038 (2018) [arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [4]

    Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no.10, 104038 (2017) [arXiv:1709.00590 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [5]

    Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,

    J. Vines, “Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no.8, 084002 (2018) [arXiv:1709.06016 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 57 references
  1. [6]

    Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post-Minkowskian approxima- tion,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post-Minkowskian approxima- tion,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.4, 044036 (2018) [arXiv:1805.10809 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Gravity,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, A. Cristofoli and P. H. Damgaard, “Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Gravity,” JHEP 08, 038 (2020) [arXiv:1910.09366 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [8]

    From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynamical invariants (with twist),

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynamical invariants (with twist),” JHEP 02, 120 (2020) [arXiv:1911.09130 [hep-th]]. 8

    2020 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,” JHEP 11, 106 (2020) [arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity,

    T. Damour, “Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.2, 024060 (2020) [arXiv:1912.02139 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, “Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP 02, 048 (2021) [arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,

    L. Blanchet, “Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,” Living Rev. Rel. 17, 2 (2014) [arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Gravitational scattering of two black holes at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational scattering of two black holes at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no.6, 064021 (2017) [arXiv:1706.06877 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999) [arXiv:gr-qc/9811091]

    1999 arXiv

  10. [15]

    On the determination of the last stable orbit for circular general relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian approximation,

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, “On the determination of the last stable orbit for circular general relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 084011 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/0005034]

    2000 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,

    M. Levi, “Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 83, no.7, 075901 (2020) [arXiv:1807.01699 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Effective field theory methods to model compact binaries,

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Effective field theory methods to model compact binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31, no.4, 043001 (2014) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/4/043001 [arXiv:1309.3474 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Near and far zones in two-body dynamics: An effective field theory perspective,

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Near and far zones in two-body dynamics: An effective field theory perspective,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.2, 024069 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024069 [arXiv:2103.03190 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, no.26, 261103 (2020) [arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Dynamics of Binary Systems to Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, “Dynamics of Binary Systems to Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,” [arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  16. [21]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-eccentricity Expansion,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-eccentricity Expansion,” [arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  17. [22]

    Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, no.23, 231104 (2019) [arXiv:1909.02375 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Binary dynamics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Binary dynamics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.2, 024062 (2020) [arXiv:2003.11891 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Sixth post-Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary systems,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post-Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary systems,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.2, 024061 (2020) [arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Sixth post-Newtonian nonlocal-in-time dynamics of binary systems,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post-Newtonian nonlocal-in-time dynamics of binary systems,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.8, 084047 (2020) [arXiv:2007.11239 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [26]

    Gravitational scattering at the seventh order inG: nonlocal contribution at the sixth post-Newtonian accuracy,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Laporta and P. Mastrolia, “Gravitational scattering at the seventh order inG: nonlocal contribution at the sixth post-Newtonian accuracy,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.4, 044038 (2021) [arXiv:2012.12918 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [27]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.25, 251101 (2018) [arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Conserva- tive Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and the Conserva- tive Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no.20, 201603 (2019) [arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,” JHEP 10, 206 (2019) [arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [30]

    General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove, “General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.17, 171601 (2018) [arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [31]

    Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell, “Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP 02, 137 (2019) [arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.20, 201602 (2021) [arXiv:2101.07255 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.17, 171601 (2021) [arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, no.16, 161103 (2022) [arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post- Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto, “Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post- Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, no.10, 101401 (2023) [arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [36]

    Local in Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, “Local in Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, no.22, 221401 (2024) [arXiv:2403.04853 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, no.24, 241402 (2024) [arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Local-in-Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Orders,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, “Local-in-Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Orders,” [arXiv:2506.20665 [hep-th]]. 9

    arXiv

  34. [40]

    Scattering of point particles by black holes: gravitational radiation,

    S. Hopper and V. Cardoso, “Scattering of point particles by black holes: gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.4, 044031 (2018) [arXiv:1706.02791 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Unbound motion on a Schwarzschild background: Practical approaches to frequency domain computations,

    S. Hopper, “Unbound motion on a Schwarzschild background: Practical approaches to frequency domain computations,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.6, 064007 (2018) [arXiv:1706.05455 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Self-force correction to the deflection angle in black-hole scattering: A scalar charge toy model,

    L. Barack and O. Long, “Self-force correction to the deflection angle in black-hole scattering: A scalar charge toy model,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.10, 104031 (2022) [arXiv:2209.03740 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model,

    L. Barack, Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, O. Long, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and F. Teng, et al. “Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.2, 024025 (2023) [arXiv:2304...

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Radiative classical gravitational observables at O(G3) from scattering amplitudes,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng, “Radiative classical gravitational observables at O(G3) from scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 10, 148 (2021) [arXiv:2104.03957 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G,

    T. Damour, “Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.12, 124008 (2020) [arXiv:2010.01641 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Radiated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Classical Scattering,

    A. V. Manohar, A. K. Ridgway and C. H. Shen, “Radiated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Classical Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.12, 121601 (2022) [arXiv:2203.04283 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Radiative contributions to gravitational scattering,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiative contributions to gravitational scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 084031 (2021) [arXiv:2107.08896 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Radiated momentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiated momentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.2, 024012 (2023) [arXiv:2210.07165 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Beyond the geodesic approximation: conservative effects of the gravitational self-force in eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,

    L. Barack and N. Sago, “Beyond the geodesic approximation: conservative effects of the gravitational self-force in eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 084023 (2011) [arXiv:1101.3331 [gr-qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gravitational self-force on a particle in eccentric orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole,

    L. Barack and N. Sago, “Gravitational self-force on a particle in eccentric orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 084021 (2010) [arXiv:1002.2386 [gr-qc]]

    2010 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Gravitational radiation reaction along general orbits in the effective one-body formalism,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational radiation reaction along general orbits in the effective one-body formalism,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 124012 (2012) [arXiv:1210.2834 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation,

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. Rel. 6, 6 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120 [gr-qc]]

    2003 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Analytic solutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post-Minkowskian expansion,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post-Minkowskian expansion,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 549 (1996) [gr-qc/9605057]

    1996 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079 (1996) [gr-qc/9603020]

    1996 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN reconstruction of the field and radiation losses in a self-force approach,

    G. Di Russo, M. Bianchi and D. Bini, “Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN reconstruction of the field and radiation losses in a self-force approach,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.2, 024002 (2025) [arXiv:2502.21040 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.