Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Running coupling further slows anti-collinear BFKL evolution, yet leaves the characteristic function at γ=1 exactly unchanged by a cancellation between kernel and DGLAP running.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 03:46 UTC pith:I3R5MHPO

load-bearing objection Solid analytic extension of the authors' anti-collinear resummation: clean scale choice, exact χ(γ=1) cancellation under running, and a usable (if approximate) Green’s function that lowers the hard-Pomeron intercept. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09337 v1 pith:I3R5MHPO submitted 2026-07-10 hep-ph hep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th

Running coupling effects in the anti-collinear resummation in high energy evolution

Alex Kovner , Michael Lublinsky , Maxim Nefedov , Vladimir Skokov This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th PACS 12.38.Bx12.38.Cy13.60.Hb
keywords JIMWLKBFKLanti-collinear resummationrunning couplingPomeron interceptgeneralized characteristic functionDGLAPCSS evolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

High-energy QCD evolution of dense gluon systems is governed by the JIMWLK equation, which reduces to BFKL in the linear regime. Large anti-collinear logarithms destabilize that evolution and must be resummed by a DGLAP-like cascade of dressed Wilson lines. This paper incorporates the running of the strong coupling into both the JIMWLK/BFKL kernel and that resummation equation. The appropriate scale for the kernel is identified as the smaller of the two available transverse momenta, a choice that can be understood through a CSS-like evolution of the gluon field with resolution scale. The resulting generalized characteristic function is generally suppressed, as expected, yet its value at the anti-collinear point γ=1 is identical to the fixed-coupling result because the two sources of running cancel exactly. An approximate Green’s function built from that characteristic function then shows that both the resummation and the running substantially lower the Pomeron intercept in the anti-collinear regime, bringing it into a phenomenologically more realistic range.

Core claim

When the running of α_s is included both in the anti-collinearly resummed BFKL kernel and in the DGLAP resummation that defines the dressed Wilson lines, the generalized characteristic function is further suppressed for γ away from 1, yet its value at γ=1 remains exactly the fixed-coupling result (4/3 or 12/11 times π/(α_s N_c)) because the two running effects cancel. Within a matched saddle-point approximation for the Green’s function the same ingredients reduce the anti-collinear Pomeron intercept by an amount comparable to the pure resummation effect.

What carries the argument

The generalized characteristic function χ(res.)(n,γ,as) obtained by acting with the LLA-resummed, running-coupling BFKL kernel on power-law test functions; its value at γ=1 is protected by the exact cancellation between the running in the overall kernel prefactor and the running inside the DGLAP solution for the resummation function R(2,1).

Load-bearing premise

The numerical claims about the Pomeron intercept rest on a matched closed-form Green’s function that glues the pure anti-collinear LLA piece to the LO running-coupling piece, together with an ad-hoc infrared cut that discards non-perturbative diffusion.

What would settle it

Compute the exact NLO or NNLO BFKL characteristic function (or the full Green’s function) with running coupling in the anti-collinear limit and check whether χ(γ=1) remains exactly equal to the fixed-coupling value and whether the intercept reduction matches the saddle-point numbers reported here.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends anti-collinear resummation of JIMWLK/BFKL evolution to include running of α_s, both in the JIMWLK kernel and in the DGLAP-like equations that define the resummation functions R_Q. It argues for the scale choice μ⋆²=min(X⁻²,Y⁻²) (with a CSS-inspired interpretation), derives the LLA momentum-space kernel and the generalized characteristic function χ(res.)(n,γ,as), and shows that running generally suppresses χ while leaving χ(γ=1) exactly unchanged by a cancellation between the two running effects. An approximate construction of the BFKL Green’s function from the generalized characteristic function is then used, via a saddle-point analysis in gluodynamics, to argue that both resummation and running substantially reduce the anti-collinear Pomeron intercept.

Significance. If the analytic results hold, the work supplies a controlled, NLO-checked extension of anti-collinear JIMWLK resummation to running coupling, with a non-trivial exact cancellation at γ=1 and a concrete scale prescription that reproduces known NLO BFKL β0 poles and the ω=0 limit of the CCSS kernel. The closed-form LLA solutions for R^(2,1) with running α_s, the operator representation of running in χ, and the explicit NLO residue checks in Appendix A are genuine technical strengths. The Green’s-function/intercept analysis is more approximate and semi-quantitative, but still provides a useful first estimate of the combined effect on the hard Pomeron intercept in the anti-collinear regime, of direct interest for small-x phenomenology.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 5.1–5.2, Eqs. (5.21) and (5.28) and Fig. 3: The claim that running roughly doubles the intercept reduction relative to fixed-coupling resummation rests on the matched approximation G0 = G(LLA+αs) + G(LO+αs) − 1 together with the ad-hoc IR cut τ_max = (1−γ)/(β0 as(p²)). The manuscript already labels the numbers semi-quantitative, but the abstract and Sec. 5.2 still present a definite comparative statement. A short robustness check (variation of τ_max, or a pure LLA-only intercept without the LO matching piece) should be added so that the reader can judge how much of the “doubling” is an artifact of the cut and matching.
  2. Sec. 4.2–4.3 and Conclusions: The exact cancellation that leaves χ(γ=1) unchanged under running (Eqs. 4.13–4.14) is derived carefully and is a central result. The same section, however, predicts an NNLO 1/(1−γ)³ coefficient (Eq. 4.15) while immediately stating that the prediction is not expected to be accurate because retardation / ω-dependence of A1 is missing. Either the NNLO formula should be demoted to an illustrative expansion of the present approximation, or a clearer separation should be made between results that are under control within the instantaneous-DGLAP framework and those that are not.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 1 and Fig. 3: Axis labels and curve legends are dense; a short table listing the five approximations (#1–#5) with equation numbers would improve readability.
  2. Sec. 2.2.1: The CSS-like argument with only the single-log kernel is insightful but long; a one-paragraph summary of the logic (why the double log is subtracted and why the field grows) would help non-specialist readers.
  3. Notation: The many superscripts (FC-LLA+αs, LLA+αs, θ-appr., etc.) are necessary but occasionally overloaded; a short glossary table early in Sec. 3 or 4 would reduce cognitive load.
  4. Typos / style: “Weiczäcker-Williams” (p. 4), “BKFL” (Fig. 1 caption), “equaiton” (App. B), and occasional missing spaces around equation references should be cleaned.
  5. Sec. 6: The comparison with the CFT value π/(αs Nc) is interesting; a one-sentence quantitative statement of the relative difference (12/11 vs 1 for nF=0) would make the “not large but significant” claim sharper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: new results (scale choice, χ(γ=1) cancellation, running R(2,1), Green’s-function intercept) are derived from the authors’ prior fixed-coupling resummation plus external NLO anchors, not assumed by construction.

full rationale

The paper extends the authors’ own fixed-coupling anti-collinear resummation ([1], [16]) by adding running coupling in both the JIMWLK/BFKL kernel and the DGLAP-like equations for R(2,1). Heavy self-citation is present and expected, but the load-bearing claims are obtained by explicit calculation: the scale μ★=min(X^{-2},Y^{-2}) is motivated by a CSS-like single-log argument (Sec. 2.2.1) and checked against the known NLO anti-collinear pole (App. A); the exact cancellation that leaves χ(γ=1) unchanged follows from the one-loop operator representation (4.3)–(4.6) acting on the LLA solution (3.30) and is not an input; the Green’s-function approximation (5.21) and τ_max cut are openly approximate and do not force the analytic cancellation. External benchmarks (Kotikov–Lipatov NLO BFKL, Balitsky–Chirilli NLO BK, CCSS kernel at ω=0) are used as independent consistency checks rather than as self-justifying uniqueness theorems. No prediction reduces by construction to a fitted constant or to an unverified self-citation. Score 1 reflects only the normal, non-load-bearing self-citation of the authors’ prior framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the LLA anti-collinear truncation of JIMWLK, one-loop running of α_s, the geometric scale choices Q⋆ and μ⋆, linearization to BFKL, and several technical approximations used only for the Green’s function and intercept. No free parameters are fitted to data; numerical plots use a fixed illustrative α_s(k²)=0.2 and an IR cut on τ.

free parameters (3)
  • α_s(k²) fixed at projectile scale in plots = 0.2
    Set to 0.2 in Figs. 1–3 for illustration; not fitted to data but chosen by hand and affects the numerical intercept curves.
  • τ_max IR cutoff on Borel/τ integral = τ_max=(1−γ)/(β0^(g) as(p²))
    Chosen as τ_max=(1−γ)/(β0 as(p²)) to avoid the Landau pole and imaginary parts (Sec. 5.2); directly affects saddle location and ω_P.
  • smearing parameter λ in smooth Θ_λ
    Introduced to avoid a spurious pole at γ=1/2 from the non-smooth max scale; analytic results use the piecewise limit λ→∞.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Anti-collinear LLA: only terms ∼α_s^n ln^n(q²/k²) are kept; power-suppressed and NLL pieces discarded after θ-approximation of Bessel functions.
    Stated in Sec. 3.3; underpins the simplified kernel (3.22) and all characteristic-function results.
  • domain assumption One-loop running of α_s with β0 (eq. 2.9) and operator representation of α_s(−∂_γ).
    Used throughout Secs. 4–5 to convert scale dependence into differential operators on γ.
  • ad hoc to paper Scale choices Q⋆²=max(X⁻²,Y⁻²) and μ⋆²=min(X⁻²,Y⁻²) eliminate large transverse logs in the anti-collinear regime.
    Derived in Sec. 2.2 from NLO JIMWLK structure and CSS single-log argument; central to the kernel.
  • domain assumption Linearization of resummed JIMWLK to BFKL via expansion in Reggeized gluon fields α^a up to second order.
    Sec. 2.3.1; standard for the linear regime but excludes nonlinear saturation effects.
  • ad hoc to paper DGLAP cascade treated as instantaneous in rapidity (no retardation / ω-dependence of A1).
    Authors flag this as the origin of the discrepancy with CFT χ(γ=1)=π/(α_s N_c) and with CCSS beyond ω=0 (Sec. 6).
  • ad hoc to paper Matched Green’s function G0 = G(LLA+αs)_nF=0 + G(LO+αs) − 1 and saddle-point evaluation of the γ-integral.
    Eq. (5.21) and Sec. 5.2; required for the intercept claim but not an exact solution of the running-coupling BFKL equation.
invented entities (2)
  • Generalized characteristic function χ(res.)(n,γ,as) / ℵ(res.) with running coupling no independent evidence
    purpose: Proxy eigenvalue of the non-scale-invariant kernel used to build the Green’s function and intercept.
    Extension of the fixed-coupling object of Ref. [16]; not a new particle but a constructed diagnostic.
  • Resummation functions R_Q^(1), R_Q^(2,1) (and quark counterparts) with running α_s(Q²) no independent evidence
    purpose: Encode DGLAP dressing of Wilson lines that implement anti-collinear resummation inside the JIMWLK kernel.
    Introduced in prior work; here solved with running coupling (eq. 3.30).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 45460 in / 3994 out tokens · 44267 ms · 2026-07-13T03:46:49.136109+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the effects of the running of the QCD coupling on the anti-collinear resummation in JIMWLK evolution in the linear (BFKL) regime. We determine the appropriate scale choice for the coupling entering the JIMWLK kernel, and derive the anti-collinearly resummed BFKL kernel, which includes running-coupling effects both in the resummation equation (i.e. DGLAP) and in the JIMWLK kernel proper. We find that the running of the coupling generally further slows down BFKL evolution, as expected. Surprisingly however the value of the generalized characteristic function at $\gamma=1$ is unaffected by the running coupling owing to subtle cancellations. We develop an approximation that allows us to use the generalized characteristic function to study the BFKL Green's function. Within this approximation we find that the Pomeron intercept in the anti-collinear regime is significantly reduced by both, the resummation and the running of the coupling.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky, V.V. Skokov and Z. Zhao,Not all that isβ0 isβ-function: the DGLAP resummation and the running coupling in NLO JIMWLK,JHEP07(2024) 148 [2308.15545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,The BFKL equation from the Wilson renormalization group,Nucl. Phys. B504(1997) 415 [hep-ph/9701284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  3. [3]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner and H. Weigert,The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Gluon evolution at finite parton density,Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 014015 [hep-ph/9709432]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high density regime,Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 014014 [hep-ph/9706377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Kovner, J.G

    A. Kovner, J.G. Milhano and H. Weigert,Relating different approaches to nonlinear QCD evolution at finite gluon density,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 114005 [hep-ph/0004014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Kovner and J.G

    A. Kovner and J.G. Milhano,Vector potential versus color charge density in low x evolution, Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 014012 [hep-ph/9904420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L.D. McLerran,Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. 1.,Nucl. Phys. A692(2001) 583 [hep-ph/0011241]. – 43 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L.D. McLerran,The Renormalization group equation for the color glass condensate,Phys. Lett. B510(2001) 133 [hep-ph/0102009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  9. [9]

    Ferreiro, E

    E. Ferreiro, E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. McLerran,Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. 2.,Nucl. Phys. A703(2002) 489 [hep-ph/0109115]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Weigert,Unitarity at small Bjorken x,Nucl

    H. Weigert,Unitarity at small Bjorken x,Nucl. Phys. A703(2002) 823 [hep-ph/0004044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    Fadin and L.N

    V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov,BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation,Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 127 [hep-ph/9802290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Camici and M

    G. Camici and M. Ciafaloni,Irreducible part of the next-to-leading BFKL kernel,Phys. Lett. B412(1997) 396

    1997

  13. [13]

    Camici and M

    G. Camici and M. Ciafaloni,Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation,Phys. Lett. B430(1998) 349

    1998

  14. [14]

    Salam,A resummation of large subleading corrections at small x,JHEP07(1998) 019

    G.P. Salam,A resummation of large subleading corrections at small x,JHEP07(1998) 019

    1998

  15. [15]

    Ciafaloni, D

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, G.P. Salam and A.M. Stasto,Renormalization group improved small x Green’s function,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 114003 [hep-ph/0307188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky, M. Nefedov and V. Skokov,Anti-collinear resummation in JIMWLK evolution in the linear regime,2601.02131

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    J.C. Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    Kovner and M

    A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Remarks on high energy evolution,JHEP03(2005) 001 [hep-ph/0502071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  19. [19]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky and Y. Mulian,Jalilian-Marian, Iancu, McLerran, Weigert, Leonidov, Kovner evolution at next to leading order,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 061704 [1310.0378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky and Y. Mulian,NLO JIMWLK evolution unabridged,JHEP08 (2014) 114 [1405.0418]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky and Y. Mulian,Conformal symmetry of JIMWLK Evolution at NLO,JHEP04(2014) 030 [1401.0374]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Balitsky and G.A

    I. Balitsky and G.A. Chirilli,Next-to-leading order evolution of color dipoles,Phys. Rev. D 77(2008) 014019 [0710.4330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Grabovsky,Connected contribution to the kernel of the evolution equation for 3-quark Wilson loop operator,JHEP09(2013) 141 [1307.5414]

    A.V. Grabovsky,Connected contribution to the kernel of the evolution equation for 3-quark Wilson loop operator,JHEP09(2013) 141 [1307.5414]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Lublinsky and Y

    M. Lublinsky and Y. Mulian,High Energy QCD at NLO: from light-cone wave function to JIMWLK evolution,JHEP05(2017) 097 [1610.03453]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    H. Duan, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Collins-Soper-Sterman Hamiltonian: High energy evolution of rapidity dependent observables,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 054022 [2407.15960]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    H. Duan, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Born-Oppenheimer Renormalization group for High Energy Scattering: CSS, DGLAP and all that,2412.05097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Kovner and M

    A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Dense-dilute duality at work: Dipoles of the target,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 074023 [hep-ph/0503155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    Caron-Huot,When does the gluon reggeize?,JHEP05(2015) 093 [1309.6521]

    S. Caron-Huot,When does the gluon reggeize?,JHEP05(2015) 093 [1309.6521]. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Altinoluk, C

    T. Altinoluk, C. Contreras, A. Kovner, E. Levin, M. Lublinsky and A. Shulkin,QCD Reggeon Calculus From KLWMIJ/JIMWLK Evolution: Vertices, Reggeization and All, JHEP09(2013) 115 [1306.2794]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Armesto, A

    N. Armesto, A. Kovner and V. López-Pardo,Exploring the DGLAP resummation in the JIMWLK Hamiltonian,JHEP07(2025) 207 [2501.19250]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Chirilli and Y.V

    G.A. Chirilli and Y.V. Kovchegov,Solution of the NLO BFKL Equation and a Strategy for Solving the All-Order BFKL Equation,JHEP06(2013) 055 [1305.1924]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Chirilli and Y.V

    G.A. Chirilli and Y.V. Kovchegov,γ∗γ∗ Cross Section at NLO and Properties of the BFKL Evolution at Higher Orders,JHEP05(2014) 099 [1403.3384]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Kotikov and L.N

    A.V. Kotikov and L.N. Lipatov,NLO corrections to the BFKL equation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 19 [hep-ph/0004008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  34. [34]

    M. Deak, K. Kutak, W. Li and A.M. Staśto,On the different forms of the kinematical constraint in BFKL,Eur. Phys. J.C79(2019) 647 [1906.09062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Forshaw and D.A

    J.R. Forshaw and D.A. Ross,Quantum Chromodynamics and the Pomeron, vol. 9, Oxford University Press (1998), 10.1017/9781009290111

    work page doi:10.1017/9781009290111 1998

  36. [36]

    Lipatov,The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics,Sov

    L.N. Lipatov,The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics,Sov. Phys. JETP63(1986) 904

    1986

  37. [37]

    Ellis, H

    J. Ellis, H. Kowalski and D.A. Ross,Evidence for the Discrete Asymptotically-Free BFKL Pomeron from HERA Data,Phys. Lett. B668(2008) 51 [0803.0258]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Kowalski, L.N

    H. Kowalski, L.N. Lipatov, D.A. Ross and G. Watt,Using HERA Data to Determine the Infrared Behaviour of the BFKL Amplitude,Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 983 [1005.0355]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    Kowalski, L.N

    H. Kowalski, L.N. Lipatov and D.A. Ross,The Behaviour of the Green Function for the BFKL Pomeron with Running Coupling,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 23 [1508.05744]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Kowalski, L.N

    H. Kowalski, L.N. Lipatov, D.A. Ross and O. Schulz,Decoupling of the leading contribution in the discrete BFKL Analysis of High-Precision HERA Data,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 777 [1707.01460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Bartels,A Note on the infrared cutoff dependence of the BFKL pomeron,J

    J. Bartels,A Note on the infrared cutoff dependence of the BFKL pomeron,J. Phys. G19 (1993) 1611

    1993

  42. [42]

    Bartels, H

    J. Bartels, H. Lotter and M. Vogt,A Numerical estimate of the small k(T) region in the BFKL pomeron,Phys. Lett. B373(1996) 215 [hep-ph/9511399]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  43. [43]

    Scimemi and A

    I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov,Non-perturbative structure of semi-inclusive deep-inelastic and Drell-Yan scattering at small transverse momentum,JHEP06(2020) 137 [1912.06532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Hentschinski, A

    M. Hentschinski, A. Sabio Vera and C. Salas,Hard to soft pomeron transition in small-x deep inelastic scattering data using optimal renormalization,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 041601

    2013

  45. [45]

    Kovner and M

    A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,From target to projectile and back again: Selfduality of high energy evolution,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 181603 [hep-ph/0502119]. – 45 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005