Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception

As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 50 of 50 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2411.09266.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2411.09266 v1

Coverage vector

measured 50 of 50 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.849625Z

measured 52 of 52 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-08T21:12:22.786308Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-07T12:41:45.282323Z

Reference resolution

50 of 50 outbound references displayed

verified exact1
verified fuzzy24
unresolved25
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation cc265590-4d54-4a37-9134-e1a2ad31be12 · outbound

This paper cites Goodfellow, J.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Goodfellow, J

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.442303Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 08aac375-f3e8-4858-a4dd-b4ef2c3bb2f5 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.433328Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation c2020e42-d6e4-445e-ba72-005208068c3f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.424696Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation dd547b7e-271b-427c-b2bb-26664b1887cf · outbound

This paper cites Ray, Disinformation, deepfakes and democracies: The need for legislative reform, The University of New South Wales Law Journal 44 (3) (2021) 983–1013.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Ray, Disinformation, deepfakes and democracies: The need for legislative reform, The University of New South Wales Law Journal 44 (3) (2021) 983–1013

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.416048Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation cc643a23-ec0d-4d00-838f-27cdd2443da6 · outbound

This paper cites Figueira, L.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Figueira, L

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.406627Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 5c1133da-62c5-4a48-b4b3-d02e189776f3 · outbound

This paper cites Vaccari, A.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Vaccari, A

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.396791Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 7a65cc05-f1b2-466b-bf58-53ed65e5234a · outbound

This paper cites Afchar, V.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Afchar, V

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.386922Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 61e2161f-8763-4ded-ac3f-0eaa29c990c6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.375698Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 5cbfcf35-f1c3-4402-ad41-f11560f896a9 · outbound

This paper cites DeepFake Detection with Inconsistent Head Poses: Reproducibility and Analysis.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception DeepFake Detection with Inconsistent Head Poses: Reproducibility and Analysis

Reference 9

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.060443Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 8396abd4-ed34-40d7-afa1-56021e6e9c95 · outbound

This paper cites Haliassos, K.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Haliassos, K

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.366362Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 7394b7c7-3b1b-460d-9a66-9b5bef219028 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.357641Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation b47752c8-eabe-4237-9ca1-1c669188641a · outbound

This paper cites Todisco, H.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Todisco, H

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.349059Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation e6895c08-9cef-4150-93cb-5376043d9331 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.340394Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation babc7944-9f9b-49e5-95d2-02e69944e224 · outbound

This paper cites Wu, H.-C.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Wu, H.-C

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.331989Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 004c7215-1a55-4b70-9666-d71d60575473 · outbound

This paper cites Karnouskos, Artificial intelligence in digital media: The era of deepfakes, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 1 (3) (2020) 138–147.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Karnouskos, Artificial intelligence in digital media: The era of deepfakes, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 1 (3) (2020) 138–147

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.323551Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 94d98ab7-20ce-4b68-bff9-1a01a20e3e0c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.314831Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation f6d25127-5d50-42eb-8a34-13d256f1c2d6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.306764Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 6d2842f9-fc88-41ec-b2b5-cda1c3344e1a · outbound

This paper cites Apolo, K.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Apolo, K

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.298481Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 5d2376e7-50cc-482e-beab-5d5ba4e42b78 · outbound

This paper cites Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.760002Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 70eeb3f3-2445-4d88-8a29-772e3d16b760 · outbound

This paper cites Korshunova, W.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Korshunova, W

Reference 20

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.289400Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation d2b23708-6ffa-4529-ae32-980ece3fcab2 · outbound

This paper cites Nirkin, Y.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Nirkin, Y

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.279594Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 3945e378-8506-4ee4-a383-a55dc82efcad · outbound

This paper cites Prajwal, R.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Prajwal, R

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.269043Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 9d7c3891-b1ed-4f80-a432-ae041fbae860 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.260481Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 34e787ba-7080-4b49-ac3b-e2e841ebf49d · outbound

This paper cites Zhou, S.-N.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Zhou, S.-N

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.251898Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation c4281608-bd30-4495-9e3a-8cfd2753f0ed · outbound

This paper cites Khalid, M.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Khalid, M

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.243205Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation f9e804be-6a28-4831-8638-019fa8d305fd · outbound

This paper cites Hashmi, S.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Hashmi, S

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.234726Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation adf236ff-b87d-4395-9cdc-9bf94f8f4b84 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.226021Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation ede72d1c-c702-49d3-aaa1-7ede32d7e8cf · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.787119Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6f667398-a126-4736-9897-4d6018f24cc6 · outbound

This paper cites Ilyas, A.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Ilyas, A

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.217816Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 7fdbee84-db87-4647-8354-2b3e6304880f · outbound

This paper cites AVTENet: A Human-Cognition-Inspired Audio-Visual Transformer-Based Ensemble Network for Video Deepfake Detection.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception AVTENet: A Human-Cognition-Inspired Audio-Visual Transformer-Based Ensemble Network for Video Deepfake Detection

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.793378Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 05bd9c1d-3b9f-4a63-a1f8-6bae9ad93dcd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.209800Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 5be9838e-63b3-41e9-84d5-e0a3904e2e93 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.201568Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 23670fd8-d7eb-4b21-9adf-3b5afe5de19d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 33

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.193058Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 24f52036-83d5-4395-87cc-5b9b956195be · outbound

This paper cites Vaikunta Pai, P.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Vaikunta Pai, P

Reference 34

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.184156Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation f478bb1d-4589-49cb-89b5-90556e95310c · outbound

This paper cites MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Action.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Action

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.807614Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b5b3c79d-873a-4683-a9aa-b91a97d166ad · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.174533Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 973ae382-2241-408b-aed5-b45f5a8140d9 · outbound

This paper cites DeAndres-Tame, R.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception DeAndres-Tame, R

Reference 37

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.165099Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 9e3e8ac8-06ca-4b6b-837d-fcb8c980c492 · outbound

This paper cites Research about the Ability of LLM in the Tamper-Detection Area.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Research about the Ability of LLM in the Tamper-Detection Area

Reference 38

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.816099Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 789f19fc-93aa-431c-90f2-1db90d013b6b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 39

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.154438Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 53511016-ea9a-4841-84ad-af93e65ad85d · outbound

This paper cites Koco ´n, I.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Koco ´n, I

Reference 40

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.145894Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation b7191925-3f51-4a59-8ca4-9163defd1b49 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 41

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.137317Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 07b67845-37ae-4a0a-999a-3ff12661931c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 42

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.129002Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 24605f5f-1617-451b-8f3f-92cfbb930362 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 43

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.120489Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 2ff39b11-ead4-4159-a8bf-88cbc5e60d61 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Unresolved cited work

Reference 44

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.110994Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 9e2c27d2-32ef-4b61-a28e-1c149ca98d06 · outbound

This paper cites Multimodal ChatGPT for Medical Applications: an Experimental Study of GPT-4V.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Multimodal ChatGPT for Medical Applications: an Experimental Study of GPT-4V

Reference 45

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.835916Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6494342a-2fc8-4f41-99ae-0c91324ffc2f · outbound

This paper cites Khalid, S.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Khalid, S

Reference 46

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.101766Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation 1af70d08-982a-44c5-921e-714e08edc9c4 · outbound

This paper cites Shi, W.-N.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Shi, W.-N

Reference 47

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.091989Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation dcc6b0b2-5511-42f4-87fd-8e4e61d13b27 · outbound

This paper cites An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

Reference 48

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:15.844335Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 95233154-4bf7-4d1e-aa45-ca94ac0f58bf · outbound

This paper cites Arnab, M.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Arnab, M

Reference 49

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.081773Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Observation fb27e99d-914a-4d65-9e50-7beb6fc2eea1 · outbound

This paper cites Gong, Y .-A.

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception Gong, Y .-A

Reference 50

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T20:55:16.071303Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

Pith citing papers

Observation 97905d3d-cbd7-4ae6-9066-5b59977b82b9 · inbound

Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM cites this paper.

Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception

Reference 86

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-08T21:12:22.786308Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7d09cb91-350e-4c57-9677-3d9252fd9da9 · inbound

Digital Forensic Investigation of the ChatGPT Windows Application cites this paper.

Digital Forensic Investigation of the ChatGPT Windows Application How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception

Reference 31

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T12:41:45.359404Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.