Bipolar Thermoelectric Superconducting Quantum Devices

A. Braggio; F. Antola; F. Giazotto; G. Marchegiani

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 295 references

Bipolar Thermoelectric Superconducting Quantum Devices

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Bipolar thermoelectricity: a heat difference across a reciprocal superconducting junction produces a voltage that can take either sign, experimentally up to ±150 μV.

desk verdict A competent, self-consolidating review of the authors' own bipolar thermoelectric program; the physics holds up and the key limitation is honestly labeled, but the efficiency comparison overreaches and independent replication is not addressed. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23262 v1 pith:IIWK7AHS submitted 2026-07-25 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hall

F. Antola , G. Marchegiani , A. Braggio , F. Giazotto This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hall PACS 74.50.+r74.25.F

keywords bipolarthermoelectriceffectsuperconductingtunneljunctionsSeebeckabsolutenegativeconductanceparticle-holesymmetrynonlineartransportmemoryJosephson

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that thermoelectric power generation does not require breaking particle-hole symmetry by hand. In a tunnel junction whose two electrodes have energy-symmetric densities of states pinned to their chemical potentials, the current remains reciprocal, I(μ)=−I(−μ), yet a sufficiently large temperature difference produces a current that flows against the applied bias. The open-circuit voltage takes two opposite values ±VS for the same thermal gradient, so the same device behaves as both n-type and p-type at once. The paradigmatic realization is an SIS′ junction with unequal superconducting gaps and suppressed Josephson coupling; the effect has been observed in such devices with Seebeck voltages up to ±150 μV and a nonlinear Seebeck coefficient near ±300 μV/K. If correct, this converts heat flow into bistable electrical states that can power memories, detectors, oscillators, and heat diodes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the energy-symmetric, chemical-potential-pinned density of states, Nα(ϵ)=Nα(−ϵ), which enforces current reciprocity I(δμ)=−I(−δμ) for arbitrary lead temperatures (Eq. 2.9). Combined with unequal DoSs between the leads — a superconducting gap asymmetry — and a thermal bias, it produces the strong detailed-balance violation ΓLR(δμ)<ΓLR(−δμ) that is the defining condition for thermoelectricity. The BCS DoS with its square-root singularity at the gap edge and monotonic decay above the gap supplies the energy selectivity; the matching-peak singularity at eV=|ΔL−ΔR| concentrates the power. In a parallel RC circuit the zero-voltage solution becomes dynamically unstable, a

What would settle it

Measure the open-circuit voltage of a thermally biased SIS′ junction with fully suppressed Josephson coupling. If for a fixed temperature difference the Seebeck voltage has only one sign (or is absent) while I(δμ) is reciprocal, the bipolar claim is falsified. Alternatively, if raising the hot-side temperature always increases |VS| instead of suppressing it once ΔL(TL) drops below ΔR(TR), the effect is not the one claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a thermoelectric response emerges in a system where linear thermoelectricity is strictly forbidden: a two-terminal tunnel junction with particle-hole symmetric densities of states, so that I(δμ)=−I(−δμ) holds at any temperature. Because the linear Onsager coefficient vanishes by symmetry, the effect is purely nonlinear: it requires a finite temperature difference and different, energy-dependent densities of states in the two leads, and it appears as a strong violation of detailed balance in which the forward tunneling rate drops below the backward rate over a finite bias window. In the paradigmatic SIS′ junction, the BCS gap in the hot electrode combines with the mo

Load-bearing premise

The entire bipolar effect presupposes that each electrode's density of states is exactly symmetric about, and pinned to, its own chemical potential, so that the current-voltage reciprocity holds at arbitrary temperatures; if gating, spin-splitting, or any spectral shift breaks that pinning, the bipolarity is lost and the junction reverts to ordinary unipolar thermoelectricity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The same junction, at one fixed temperature difference, delivers either positive or negative output voltage, so a single material platform covers both n-type and p-type thermoelectric functions without doping or band engineering.
The bistable voltage states ±VL realize a volatile, heat-powered memory: a current pulse writes a bit, the voltage across a load reads it, and no static bias is needed.
The measured nonlinear Seebeck coefficient (~±300 μV/K) is roughly five orders of magnitude above the normal-metal Mott estimate, making the device competitive with spin-split hybrid junctions at cryogenic temperatures.
The same nonlinearity yields heat rectification and a passive heat pipe, plus zero-bias amplification and relaxation oscillations, all powered by a temperature difference alone.
If the mechanism extends to Kondo, bilayer-graphene, and SQUIPT platforms as the review suggests, bipolar thermoelectricity could operate at higher temperatures and be tuned by gates or flux.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The crucial testable extension of the paper's logic is the boundary of reciprocity: any gate-induced shift of the Fermi energy away from the DoS center, or any spin-splitting, should weaken or destroy bipolarity and convert the response into a conventional unipolar one; an experiment mapping the disappearance of ±VS with gate voltage would isolate the mechanism.
The quantum, environment-driven variant suggests a thermoelectric 'spectrometer': the current's sensitivity to the environmental impedance spectrum could be used to measure the density of photon modes of an on-chip circuit.
If the pinning condition is relaxed in engineered materials, one might design a device in which the bipolar response is switched on and off by an external gate, giving a heat-controlled transistor-like element — a step the review does not take.
The non-monotonic dependence of VS on injected power (it first rises, then vanishes when the gap asymmetry closes) provides a diagnostic: observing a Seebeck signal that disappears with increasing ΔT is a signature of the nonlinear mechanism.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know about this paper: it is a review, and a decent one, of the authors' own bipolar thermoelectric program. If you want the full derivation of why a gap-asymmetric SIS′ junction with reciprocal IV can still generate thermoelectric power — two opposite Seebeck voltages for one temperature difference — this is the clearest place to get it. The analytic core checks out: the reciprocity argument from energy-symmetric DoS, the positive-dissipation proof for identical DoS, the g0<0 result, and the toy-model efficiency bound below Carnot. The sufficient conditions are honestly labeled, and the experimental summary (Seebeck voltages ±150 μV, nonlinear Seebeck coefficient ±300 μV/K) is drawn from published work, not invented. The quantum environment-assisted variant in Sec. 6 is a genuine conceptual extension and is presented carefully within the P(E) framework.

The real soft spot is not the physics but the scope. The review consolidates almost exclusively the authors' own outputs — theory, experiment, applications, and the quantum variant are all from the same core group. Independent replication is not discussed. That is a limitation for a 'review,' but it is an honest one; the field is young and the same group did most of the heavy lifting.

The load-bearing assumption, Eq. (2.6), is called out clearly: the DoS must be exactly even about the chemical potential and remain pinned to it. The authors state flat out that this is required for bipolarity. That is the right level of honesty. The outlook toward Kondo, 2D, and topological platforms is explicitly left unassessed, which is fine as a roadmap.

What should be fixed: the thermodynamic efficiency comparison in §2.9.2. Reporting 40% efficiency for the idealized junction next to 14–15% for bulk thermoelectric modules mixes a theoretical cryogenic engine with measured room-temperature modules. That comparison overclaims and should be reframed. Also, the appendix caption in Fig. 8.1 lists the same Dynes parameter for both panels; likely a typo that should be corrected.

Bottom line: this review deserves a serious referee and will be useful to anyone entering cryogenic thermoelectrics. I would accept it after moderate revision, with the efficiency claim softened and the appendix cleaned up.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review develops and surveys the bipolar thermoelectric effect in tunnel junctions with energy-symmetric densities of states. The central theoretical result is that a thermally biased SIS′ junction with unequal gaps and suppressed Josephson coupling, although satisfying current reciprocity I(δμ)=−I(−δμ) and having vanishing linear Seebeck response, can develop a nonlinear thermoelectric current flowing against the bias, power generation, and two opposite open-circuit voltages ±V_S for a single temperature gradient. The authors derive sufficient conditions (gapped hot DoS, monotonically decreasing cold DoS), a toy model, thermodynamic efficiency bounds below Carnot, stability/bistability analysis, and review experimental BTJE results, applications (memories, detectors, heat pipes, amplifiers), hybrid platforms (SET, BLG, SQUIPT, spin-split), and a quantum-environment variant.

Significance. If taken at face value, the review consolidates a genuinely novel mechanism: nonlinear thermoelectricity coexisting with reciprocal IV, yielding bipolar output. The analytic derivations (Eqs. 2.7–2.9, 2.15, 2.29–2.31, 2.35) are internally consistent, and the review is unusually explicit about the assumptions, particularly Eq. (2.6) and the neglect of gating/Josephson effects. It also offers falsifiable predictions (matching-peak location, Seebeck voltage magnitudes, efficiency boundaries). The main value is as a reference for the SIS′ platform; the broader claims for Kondo/2D/topological systems are honestly deferred.

major comments (2)

[Abstract; Sec. 7] The abstract and conclusions frame the effect as a property of 'reciprocal systems' without qualification. The derivation of bipolarity rests on Eq. (2.6), the exact energy symmetry and chemical-potential pinning of each lead DoS; as the authors state in Sec. 2.5, this pinning 'is required to guarantee the IV reciprocity and, consequently, the bipolar nature of the effect.' For the Kondo, BLG, and topological platforms listed in Sec. 7, this symmetry is only approximate or unverified, and Sec. 5.2 itself shows that a gate-induced Fermi shift (E_F^BLG ≠ 0) breaks reciprocity and adds a conventional unipolar component. The scope claim should be tempered in the abstract, e.g., 'bipolar thermoelectricity in junctions with exactly energy-symmetric, chemically pinned DoS (paradigmatically SIS′).'
[Sec. 3.2.3] The review states that the BTJE experiments 'confirmed' the effect (Refs [150,127]) and quotes a nonlinear Seebeck coefficient ±300 μV/K. These experiments are from a single group, and ΔT is extracted by fitting the out-of-equilibrium IV to the same tunneling model under test. The review should explicitly flag the absence of independent replication and discuss the potential circularity in the temperature calibration, since the headline Seebeck value depends on the fitted ΔT. A brief caveat in Sec. 3.2 would address this.

minor comments (4)

[Appendix 8.1, Fig. 8.1 caption] Both panels are described with γ_j = 10^{-2}Δ0,j, but the text says panel (a) is 'higher' and panel (b) is 'lower' values. The second value is presumably 10^{-6}Δ0,j or similar; please correct.
[Sec. 2.8] Typo: 'contrasts strongly with the usual unipolar s' should be 'unipolar thermoelectrics'.
[Sec. 6.2] Typo: 'near resonantce with the gap asymmetry' should be 'resonance'.
[Sec. 2.5, footnote 8] The sentence about the self-energy is grammatically awkward ('has a even- (odd-)in energy imaginary (real) part'); please rephrase for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central SIS′ derivation is self-contained from stated DoS-symmetry assumptions; the reported Seebeck coefficient carries a fitted-ΔT caveat and experimental confirmation relies on same-group citations, but no step reduces to its input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's theoretical derivation is not circular. Starting from the tunneling Hamiltonian and Golden-Rule rates (Eq. 2.4), the review derives reciprocity I(δμ)=−I(−δμ) from the energy-symmetric DoS assumption (Eq. 2.6), then shows that linear thermoelectricity vanishes and derives explicit conditions (Eqs. 2.16, 2.19, 2.20) for a nonlinear bipolar response in SIS′ junctions. These results are obtained directly from stated assumptions, not from fitted parameters or from the authors' prior papers; the review re-derives the key expressions rather than merely citing them. The extension to the experimental BTJE device is presented as an independent measurement: the Seebeck voltages ±V_S are directly observed, and the paper transparently states that ΔT is extracted by fitting the out-of-equilibrium IV characteristics to the same tunneling model. This makes the numerical value of the nonlinear Seebeck coefficient (±300 μV/K) model-dependent, but the existence of the bipolar response does not rely on that fitted normalization. The heavy reliance on Refs. [59,60,127,150] and related works is a self-citation pattern typical of a research-group review, but these citations are not used to establish the derivation chain; the theoretical content is independently exhibited in the text, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the load-bearing scope condition of Eq. (2.6): DoS pinning is 'required to guarantee the IV reciprocity and, consequently, the bipolar nature of the effect,' and the authors leave assessment of non-SIS′ platforms (Kondo, 2D, topological) to future work. This is an honest limitation rather than a circular step. Overall, while self-citation and fitting caveats warrant a slight score above zero, the central derivation is self-contained and no prediction reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard BCS tunneling theory plus several stated domain assumptions. The main burden is the EIS/pinning assumption (Eq. 2.6) that the authors themselves identify as the origin of reciprocity and bipolarity; a second burden is the phenomenological Dynes regularization, since predicted power and efficiency values depend on γ. No invented entities (no new particles, forces, or mediators) are introduced; 'bipolar thermoelectricity' and 'strong detailed-balance violation' are labels for behaviors rather than entities, and both are operationally defined.

free parameters (4)

Dynes parameters γα = 10⁻⁴ Δ0,j in theory plots; 10⁻² in Appendix Fig. 8.1; in experiments estimated from subgap conductance
Energy-independent phenomenological broadening (Eq. 2.27); the matching-peak thermoelectric power diverges as γ→0 (Sec. 2.8.2), so the quoted power and efficiency values depend on the chosen γ. Not predicted, assigned.
Gap ratio r = ΔR,0/ΔL,0 = 0.5 in most figures; ≈0.35 for maximum power; ≈0.35 in the BTJE device via Al/Cu inverse proximity
Design parameter controlling the asymmetry; the effect vanishes as r→1. Engineered, not derived.
Lead electronic temperatures TL, TR in experimental analysis = extracted by fitting out-of-equilibrium IV characteristics (Sec. 3.2.3)
The review's headline experimental number (nonlinear Seebeck coefficient ±300 μV/K) is computed from temperatures fitted to the same IV data that show the effect, rather than from independent thermometry.
Toy-model DoS weights nα = unspecified 'film-dependent constants' (Eq. 2.22)
Ad hoc normalization constants in the delta-function toy model used for the closed-form current Eq. (2.22).

assumptions (7)

domain assumption BCS mean-field Hamiltonian for the leads (Eq. 2.1) with k-independent order parameter Δα; the DoS therefore satisfies the energy symmetry Nα(ε)=Nα(−ε) (Eq. 2.6).
Standard description of superconducting electrodes; the gap opens at the Fermi level. Load-bearing because Eq. (2.6) forces I(δμ)=−I(−δμ) (Eq. 2.9) and hence the bipolar response (Secs. 2.2-2.3).
domain assumption First-order Fermi Golden Rule tunneling with energy-independent matrix element t_kq ≃ t (Sec. 2.2, Eqs. 2.3-2.4).
Weak-barrier perturbation theory (Bardeen tunneling); used for all rates including the P(E) generalization (Eq. 6.3).
domain assumption Each electrode remains in quasi-equilibrium at a single electronic temperature Tα, with electrons thermally decoupled from phonons (Sec. 3.1.4).
The whole thermal-bias description requires fast e-e scattering and slow e-ph relaxation; the review cites this as the operating regime of the experiments but it is not independently verified here.
domain assumption Josephson coupling can be neglected in theory and sufficiently suppressed in experiment (Secs. 2.7, 3.1.3).
The QP thermoelectric signal lives in the subgap regime where a supercurrent would dominate; the BTJE suppresses Ic to 1.57‰ of its value via flux interference (Sec. 3.2.2), but residual supercurrent still modifies device operation (Sec. 3.2.5).
domain assumption P(E) treatment assumes the electromagnetic environment stays in thermal equilibrium at Te (Sec. 6.1).
Needed for the detailed-balance form P(−E)=e^(−E/kBTe)P(E); the review notes a self-consistent treatment would otherwise be required.
domain assumption Dynes-broadened BCS DoS (Eq. 2.27) with energy-independent γ regularizes the matching-peak divergences and still satisfies the energy symmetry.
Phenomenological regularizer, standard in the literature; the magnitude of thermoelectric power depends on γ, which is acknowledged (Sec. 2.8.2, Appendix 8.1).
standard math Onsager reciprocal relations assume a time-reversal symmetric Hamiltonian (Sec. 1.2).
Background for why linear thermoelectricity vanishes in reciprocal systems; standard textbook result.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bipolar Thermoelectric Superconducting Quantum Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IIWK7AHS

@misc{pith2026260723262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bipolar Thermoelectric Superconducting Quantum Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IIWK7AHS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23262}
}

read the original abstract

Quantum technologies increasingly require accurate modeling of their hardware components and of the non-equilibrium regimes in which they operate, where managing heat and energy flow becomes a central challenge. Thermoelectric effects, the direct conversion of a thermal gradient into electrical signals, offer one such route to this control. In this review, we present an overview of the bipolar thermoelectric effect, a recent development for thermoelectric conversion in reciprocal systems, where linear effects are forbidden by symmetry. This symmetry yields a bipolar thermoelectric signal, in which the generated voltage can exhibit both polarities at a fixed temperature gradient. This represents a non-trivial novelty relative to conventional thermoelectric effects, in which carrier dominance determines the sign of the thermoelectric signal. We summarize the underlying physical principles, showing how thermoelectricity emerges as a strong violation of detailed balance. Concrete physical conditions for obtaining bipolar thermoelectricity are then outlined, of which a tunnel junction between two superconductors with unequal energy gaps and suppressed Josephson coupling is the paradigmatic example. Afterward, we discuss the experimental observation of the effect to date and related proposals for different applications, including volatile memories and radiation detection. Finally, we briefly survey recent developments and outlooks, ranging from extensions to new platforms to a proposal for a novel quantum thermoelectric effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23262 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (26 more)

**Figure 2.** Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png]

**Figure 2.** Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png]

**Figure 2.** Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png]

**Figure 2.** Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png]

**Figure 2.** Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_2.png]

**Figure 2.** Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_2.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_3.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_3.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_3.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_3.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_3.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_3.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_3.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_4.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_4.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_4.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Bipolar thermoelectric response in a SET. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_5.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_5.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_5.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_5.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_6.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_6.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

295 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages

[1]

Giaever, I.: Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett.5(4), 147 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.147

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.5.147 1960
[2]

Giaever, I.: Electron tunneling between two superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 5(10), 464 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.464

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.5.464 1960
[3]

Josephson, B.D.: Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1(7), 251–253 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0

doi:10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0 1962
[4]

Anderson, P.W., Rowell, J.M.: Probable observation of the Josephson supercon- ducting tunneling effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.10(6), 230 (1963) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.10.230

1963
[5]

Bardeen, J.: Tunneling into superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 147–149 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.147

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.9.147 1962
[6]

Jaklevic, R.C., Lambe, J., Silver, A.H., Mercereau, J.E.: Quantum interference effects in josephson tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett.12(7), 159 (1964) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.159

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.159 1964
[7]

(eds.): The SQUID Handbook: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, Volume I

Clarke, J., Braginski, A.I. (eds.): The SQUID Handbook: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, Volume I. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany (2004)

2004
[9]

Shapiro, S.: Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling: The effect of microwaves and other observations. Phys. Rev. Lett.11(2), 80 (1963) https: 74 //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.80

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.80 1963

Show all 295 references

[10]

Hamilton, C.A.: Josephson voltage standards. Rev. Sci. Instrum.71(10), 3611– 3623 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1289507

2000 doi
[11]

for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electric circuit

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2025. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2025/. Awarded to J. Clarke, M. H. Devoret, and J. M. Martinis “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electr...

2025
[12]

Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T.P., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W.D.: A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6(2), 021318 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550

2019 doi
[13]

Blais, A., Grimsmo, A.L., Girvin, S.M., Wallraff, A.: Circuit quantum elec- trodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2), 025005 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.93.025005

2021
[14]

Maki, K., Griffin, A.: Entropy transport between two superconductors by elec- tron tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett.15, 921–923 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.15.921

1965
[15]

Nature 492(7429), 401–405 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11702

Mart ´ ınez-P´ erez, M.J., Giazotto, F.: The Josephson heat interferometer. Nature 492(7429), 401–405 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11702

2012 doi
[16]

Fornieri, A., Giazotto, F.: Towards phase-coherent caloritronics in superconduct- ing circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol.12(10), 944–952 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nnano.2017.204

2017
[17]

Giazotto, F., Heikkil¨ a, T.T., Luukanen, A., Savin, A.M., Pekola, J.P.: Oppor- tunities for mesoscopics in thermometry and refrigeration: Physics and appli- cations. Rev. Mod. Phys.78(1), 217–274 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.78.217

2006
[18]

Muhonen, J.T., Meschke, M., Pekola, J.P.: Micrometre-scale refrigerators. Rep. Prog. Phys.75(4), 046501 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/4/ 046501

2012 doi
[19]

Onsager, L.: Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. i. Phys. Rev.37(4), 405 (1931) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

1931 doi
[20]

Benenti, G., Casati, G., Saito, K., Whitney, R.S.: Fundamental aspects of steady- state conversion of heat to work at the nanoscale. Phys. Rep.694, 1–124 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.008

2017 doi
[21]

L¨ osche, A.: N. f. mott, e. a. davis. electronic processes in non-crystalline materials clarendon-press, oxford 1971 437 seiten.£7,50. Kristall und Technik7(4), 55–56 75 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.19720070420

1971 doi
[22]

Goldsmid, H.J.,et al.: Introduction to Thermoelectricity vol. 121. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49256-7

2010 doi
[23]

Zeitschrift f¨ ur die gesamte K¨ alte-Industrie34, 197–200 (1927)

Meissner, W.: Das elektrische verhalten der metalle im temperaturgebiet des fl¨ ussigen heliums. Zeitschrift f¨ ur die gesamte K¨ alte-Industrie34, 197–200 (1927). In German

1927
[24]

Ginzburg, V.L.: On the thermoelectric phenomena in superconductors. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.14, 177–182 (1944)

1944
[25]

Soviet Physics Uspekhi21(5), 381–404 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1070/ PU1978v021n05ABEH005552

Ginzburg, V.L., Zharkov, G.F.: Thermoelectric effects in superconduc- tors. Soviet Physics Uspekhi21(5), 381–404 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1070/ PU1978v021n05ABEH005552

1978
[26]

Claughton, N.R., Lambert, C.J.: Thermoelectric properties of mesoscopic superconductors. Phys. Rev. B53, 6605–6612 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.53.6605

1996
[27]

Kalenkov, M.S., Zaikin, A.D.: Large thermoelectric effect in ballistic andreev interferometers. Phys. Rev. B95, 024518 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.95.024518

2017
[28]

JETP Lett.114, 593–608 (2021) https://doi.org/10

Kalenkov, M.S., Zaikin, A.D.: Phase-coherent thermoelectricity in superconduct- ing hybrids (brief review). JETP Lett.114, 593–608 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1134/S0021364021220021

2021
[29]

Semiconductor Physics

Sch¨ on, G.: Thermoelectric effects in superconductors. In: Treusch, J. (ed.) Festk¨ orperprobleme 21: Plenary Lectures of the Divisions “Semiconductor Physics” “Metal Physics” “Low Temperature Physics” “Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics” “Thin Films” “Magnetism” “Quantum...

1981 doi
[30]

Phys- ica B+C109-110, 1710–1721 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4363(82) 90195-4

Van Harlingen, D.J.: Thermoelectric effects in the superconducting state. Phys- ica B+C109-110, 1710–1721 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4363(82) 90195-4

1982 doi
[31]

Kalenkov, M.S., Zaikin, A.D., Kuzmin, L.S.: Theory of a large thermoelectric effect in superconductors doped with magnetic impurities. Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 147004 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.147004

2012 doi
[32]

Van Harlingen, D.J., Heidel, D.F., Garland, J.C.: Experimental study of ther- moelectricity in superconducting indium. Phys. Rev. B21(5), 1842 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.21.1842 76

1980 doi
[33]

para- dox

Shelly, C.D., Matrozova, E.A., Petrashov, V.T.: Resolving thermoelectric “para- dox” in superconductors. Sci. Adv.2(2), 1501250 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1126/sciadv.1501250

2016
[34]

Bardeen, J., Cooper, L.N., Schrieffer, J.R.: Theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev.108, 1175–1204 (1957) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175

1957 doi
[36]

Eom, J., Chien, C., Chandrasekhar, V.: Phase dependent thermopower in andreev interferometers. Phys. Rev. Lett.81(2), 437 (1998) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.81.437

1998
[37]

Supercond

Chandrasekhar, V.: Thermal transport in superconductor/normal-metal struc- tures. Supercond. Sci. Technol.22(8), 083001 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0953-2048/22/8/083001

2009
[38]

Galaktionov, A.V., Zaikin, A.D., Kuzmin, L.S.: Andreev interferometer with three superconducting electrodes. Phys. Rev. B85, 224523 (2012) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.224523

2012 doi
[39]

Dolgirev, P.E., Kalenkov, M.S., Zaikin, A.D.: Current-phase relation and flux- dependent thermoelectricity in andreev interferometers. Phys. Rev. B97, 054521 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054521

2018 doi
[40]

Kirsanov, N.S., Tan, Z.B., Golubev, D.S., Hakonen, P.J., Lesovik, G.B.: Heat switch and thermoelectric effects based on cooper-pair splitting and elas- tic cotunneling. Phys. Rev. B99, 115127 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.99.115127

2019
[41]

Hussein, R., Governale, M., Kohler, S., Belzig, W., Giazotto, F., Braggio, A.: Nonlocal thermoelectricity in a cooper-pair splitter. Phys. Rev. B99, 075429 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.075429

2019 doi
[42]

Blasi, G., Taddei, F., Arrachea, L., Carrega, M., Braggio, A.: Nonlocal thermo- electricity in a superconductor–topological-insulator–superconductor junction in contact with a normal-metal probe: Evidence for helical edge states. Phys. Rev. Lett.124(22), 227701 (2020) https://...

2020 doi
[43]

Tan, Z.B., Laitinen, A., Kirsanov, N.S., Galda, A., Vinokur, V.M., Haque, M., Savin, A., Golubev, D.S., Lesovik, G.B., Hakonen, P.J.: Thermoelectric current in a graphene cooper pair splitter. Nat. Commun.12(1), 1123 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20476-7

2021 doi
[44]

Dover Publications, 77 Mineola, New York (2004)

Tinkham, M.: Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, 77 Mineola, New York (2004)

2004
[45]

Machon, P., Eschrig, M., Belzig, W.: Nonlocal thermoelectric effects and non- local Onsager relations in a three-terminal proximity-coupled superconductor- ferromagnet device. Phys. Rev. Lett.110(4), 047002 (2013) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.110.047002

2013
[46]

Ozaeta, A., Virtanen, P., Bergeret, F.S., Heikkil¨ a, T.T.: Predicted very large thermoelectric effect in ferromagnet-superconductor junctions in the presence of a spin-splitting magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 057001 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.057001

2014 doi
[47]

Kalenkov, M.S., Zaikin, A.D.: Electron-hole imbalance and large thermoelectric effect in superconducting hybrids with spin-active interfaces. Phys. Rev. B90, 134502 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.134502

2014 doi
[48]

Kolenda, S., Wolf, M.J., Beckmann, D.: Observation of thermoelectric currents in high-field superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(9), 097001 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.097001

2016 doi
[49]

Kolenda, S., S¨ urgers, C., Fischer, G., Beckmann, D.: Thermoelectric effects in superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions on europium sulfide. Phys. Rev. B 95(22), 224505 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.224505

2017 doi
[50]

Dutta, P., Alves, K.R., Black-Schaffer, A.M.: Thermoelectricity carried by proximity-induced odd-frequency pairing in ferromagnet/superconductor junc- tions. Phys. Rev. B102, 094513 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102. 094513

2020 doi
[51]

Savander, T., Tamura, S., Flindt, C., Tanaka, Y., Burset, P.: Thermoelectric detection of andreev states in unconventional superconductors. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043388 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043388

2020 doi
[52]

Sonar, V., Trocha, P.: Impact of gap anisotropy of polar and anderson– brinkman–morel p-wave superconductors on thermoelectric properties of quan- tum dot hybrids. Sci. Rep. (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46160-2

2026 doi
[53]

https://arxiv.org/ abs/2606.21599

Pierattelli, L., Taddei, F., Romito, A., Braggio, A.: Subgap Linear Thermoelec- tricity in Superconducting Quantum Hall Systems (2026). https://arxiv.org/ abs/2606.21599

2026 arXiv
[54]

Singh, A.N., Bhandari, B., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F., Jordan, A.N.: Giant ther- moelectric response of fluxons in superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 256002 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.256002

2024 doi
[55]

Arrachea, L., Braggio, A., Burset, P., Lee, E.J.H., Levy Yeyati, A., S´ anchez, R.: Thermoelectric processes of quantum normal-superconductor interfaces. Ann. 78 Phys.537(11), 00197 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202500197

2025 doi
[56]

Bergeret, F.S., Silaev, M., Virtanen, P., Heikkil¨ a, T.T.: Colloquium: Nonequi- librium effects in superconductors with a spin-splitting field. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90(4), 041001 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.041001

2018 doi
[57]

Heikkil¨ a, T.T., Silaev, M., Virtanen, P., Bergeret, F.S.: Thermal, electric and spin transport in superconductor/ferromagnetic-insulator structures. Prog. Surf. Sci..94(3), 100540 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2019.100540

2019
[58]

Beckmann, D.: Spin transport in high-field superconductors. Ann. Phys.536(7), 2400054 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202400054

2024 doi
[59]

Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Nonlinear Thermoelectricity with Electron-Hole Symmetric Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.124(10), 106801 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.106801

2020 doi
[60]

Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Superconducting nonlinear thermo- electric heat engine. Phys. Rev. B101(21), 214509 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.101.214509

2020
[62]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

Nazarov, Y.V., Blanter, Y.M.: Quantum Transport: Introduction to Nanoscience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511626906

2009 doi
[63]

Vool, U., Devoret, M.: Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits. Int. J. Cir. Theor. Appl.45(7), 897–934 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.2359 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cta.2359

2017 doi
[64]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

Datta, S.: Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164313

2005 doi
[65]

University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1950)

Fermi, E.: Nuclear Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1950)

1950
[66]

Dirac, P.A.M.: The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A114, 243 (1927) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0039

1927
[67]

Visser, T.D.: Whose golden rule is it anyway? Am. J. Phys.77, 487 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3096649

2009 doi
[68]

Bardeen, J.: Tunnelling from a many-particle point of view. Phys. Rev. Lett.6, 57–59 (1961) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.57 79

1961 doi
[69]

Giaever, I., Megerle, K.: Study of superconductors by electron tunneling. Phys. Rev.122, 1101–1111 (1961) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.1101

1961 doi
[70]

CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

Gennes, P.G.D.: Superconductivity Of Metals And Alloys. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497032

2018 doi
[72]

Ferraro, D., Braggio, A., Magnoli, N., Sassetti, M.: Neutral modes’ edge state dynamics through quantum point contacts. New J. Phys.12(1), 013012 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/013012

2010 doi
[73]

Physica55, 399–404 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(71)90280-1

Rogovin, D., Scalapino, D.J.: Tunnel junction current fluctuations. Physica55, 399–404 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(71)90280-1

1971 doi
[75]

S´ anchez, D., L´ opez, R.: Nonlinear phenomena in quantum thermoelectrics and heat. C. R. Phys.17(10), 1060–1071 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2016. 08.005

2016 doi
[76]

Nature436(7053), 928 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1038/436928a

Ros, A., Eichhorn, R., Regtmeier, J., Duong, T.T., Reimann, P., Anselmetti, D.: Brownian motion: absolute negative particle mobility. Nature436(7053), 928 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1038/436928a

2005 doi
[77]

S lapik, A., Luczka, J., H¨ anggi, P., Spiechowicz, J.: Tunable mass separation via negative mobility. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 070602 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.070602

2019
[78]

Wang, J., Casati, G., Benenti, G.: Inverse currents in hamiltonian cou- pled transport. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 110607 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.110607

2020
[79]

Caroli, C., Combescot, R., Nozieres, P., Saint-James, D.: Direct calculation of the tunneling current. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.4(8), 916 (1971) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/4/8/018

1971 doi
[80]

Caroli, C., Combescot, R., Lederer, D., Nozieres, P., Saint-James, D.: A direct calculation of the tunnelling current. ii. free electron description. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.4(16), 2598 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/4/16/ 025 80

1971 doi
[81]

Meir, Y., Wingreen, N.S.: Landauer formula for the current through an inter- acting electron region. Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 2512–2515 (1992) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2512

1992 doi
[82]

Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008)

Haug, H., Jauho, A.-P.: Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semicon- ductors, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-73564-9

2008
[83]

Cambridge Studies in Magnetism

Hewson, A.C.: The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions. Cambridge Studies in Magnetism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993). https://doi.org/10. 1017/CBO9780511470752

1993
[84]

Horvati´ c, B., Sokcevi´ c, D., Zlati´ c, V.: Finite-temperature spectral density for the Anderson model. Phys. Rev. B36, 675–683 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.36.675

1987
[85]

ACS Nano8(11), 11576–11582 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1021/nn504817m

Yu, Y., She, L., Fu, H., Huang, M., Li, H., Meng, S., Cao, G.: Kondo effect mediated topological protection: Co on sb(111). ACS Nano8(11), 11576–11582 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1021/nn504817m

2014 doi
[86]

Science281(5376), 540–544 (1998) https://doi.org/10

Cronenwett, S.M., Oosterkamp, T.H., Kouwenhoven, L.P.: A tunable kondo effect in quantum dots. Science281(5376), 540–544 (1998) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.281.5376.540

1998
[87]

Nature405, 764–767 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1038/35015509

Sasaki, S., De Franceschi, S., Elzerman, J.M., Wiel, W.G., Eto, M., Tarucha, S., Kouwenhoven, L.P.: Kondo effect in an integer-spin quantum dot. Nature405, 764–767 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1038/35015509

2000 doi
[88]

Science293(5538), 2221–2223 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1063182

Jeong, H., Chang, A.M., Melloch, M.R.: The kondo effect in an artificial quantum dot molecule. Science293(5538), 2221–2223 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1063182

2001
[89]

Sykora, S., Becker, K.W.: Heavy fermion properties of the kondo lattice model. Sci. Rep.3(1), 2691 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02691

2013 doi
[90]

Nakamura, T., Sugihara, H., Chen, Y., Yukawa, R., Ohtsubo, Y., Tanaka, K., Kitamura, M., Kumigashira, H., Kimura, S.: Two-dimensional heavy fermion in a monoatomic-layer kondo lattice ybcu 2. Nat. Commun.14(1), 7850 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43662-9

2023 doi
[91]

F¨ ath, M., Aarts, J., Menovsky, A.A., Nieuwenhuys, G.J., Mydosh, J.A.: Tunnel- ing spectroscopy on the correlation effects in fesi. Phys. Rev. B58, 15483–15490 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.15483

1998 doi
[92]

Nature 599(7886), 582–586 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04021-0 81

Vaˇ no, V., Amini, M., Ganguli, S.C., Chen, G., Lado, J.L., Kezilebieke, S., Lil- jeroth, P.: Artificial heavy fermions in a van der waals heterostructure. Nature 599(7886), 582–586 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04021-0 81

2021 doi
[93]

Sokolik, A.A., Aminov, A.F., Vdovin, E.E., Khanin, Y.N., Kashchenko, M.A., Bandurin, D.A., Ghazaryan, D.A., Morozov, S.V., Novoselov, K.S.: Probing the features of electron dispersion by tunneling between slightly twisted bilayer graphene sheets. Appl. Phys. Lett.127(23), 2331...

2025
[94]

Andrei, E.Y., MacDonald, A.H.: Graphene bilayers with a twist. Nat. Mater. 19(12), 1265–1275 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00840-0

2020 doi
[95]

Battisti, S., De Simoni, G., Chirolli, L., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Bipolar thermoelectric superconducting single-electron transistor. Phys. Rev. Res.6(1), 012022 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012022

2024 doi
[96]

Crooks, G.E.: Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Phys. Rev. E60, 2721–2726 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

1999 doi
[97]

Seifert, U.: Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Rep. Prog. Phys.75(12), 126001 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/75/12/126001

2012
[98]

Gross, F., Chandrasekhar, B.S., Einzel, D., Andres, K., Hirschfeld, P.J., Ott, H.R., Beuers, J., Fisk, Z., Smith, J.L.: Anomalous temperature dependence of the magnetic field penetration depth in superconducting ube13. Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter64, 175 (1986) https://doi.org/1...

1986 doi
[99]

Mitrovi´ c, B., Zarate, H.G., Carbotte, J.P.: The ratio 2∆0 kB Tc within eliashberg theory. Phys. Rev. B29, 184–190 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29. 184

1984 doi
[100]

McMillan, W.L.: Tunneling model of the superconducting proximity effect. Phys. Rev.175, 537–542 (1968) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.175.537

1968 doi
[101]

Dynes, R.C., Narayanamurti, V., Garno, J.P.: Direct measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 1509–1512 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.1509

1978 doi
[102]

Dynes, R.C., Garno, J.P., Hertel, G.B., Orlando, T.P.: Tunneling study of super- conductivity near the metal-insulator transition. Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 2437–2440 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2437

1984 doi
[103]

Jung, H., Kim, Y., Jung, K., Im, H., Pashkin, Y.A., Astafiev, O., Nakamura, Y., Lee, H., Miyamoto, Y., Tsai, J.S.: Potential barrier modification and interface states formation in metal-oxide-metal tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B80, 125413 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

2009 doi
[104]

Nahum, M., Martinis, J.M.: Ultrasensitive-hot-electron microbolometer. Appl. 82 Phys. Lett.63(22), 3075–3077 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.110237

1993 doi
[105]

Martinis, J.M., Ansmann, M., Aumentado, J.: Energy decay in superconduct- ing josephson-junction qubits from nonequilibrium quasiparticle excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 097002 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103. 097002

2009 doi
[106]

Pekola, J.P., Maisi, V.F., Kafanov, S., Chekurov, N., Kemppinen, A., Pashkin, Y.A., Saira, O.-P., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., Tsai, J.S.: Environment-assisted tunneling as an origin of the dynes density of states. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 026803 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.026803

2010 doi
[107]

Herman, F., Hlubina, R.: Microscopic interpretation of the dynes formula for the tunneling density of states. Phys. Rev. B94, 144508 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144508

2016 doi
[108]

Hosseinkhani, A., Catelani, G.: Proximity effect in normal-metal quasiparticle traps. Phys. Rev. B97, 054513 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97. 054513

2018 doi
[109]

https://arxiv.org/ abs/2512.17765

Marchegiani, G., Catelani, G.: Proximity effect in asymmetric-gap supercon- ducting bilayers and regularization of transition rates (2025). https://arxiv.org/ abs/2512.17765

2025
[110]

Feshchenko, A.V., Casparis, L., Khaymovich, I.M., Maradan, D., Saira, O.-P., Palma, M., Meschke, M., Pekola, J.P., Zumb¨ uhl, D.M.: Tunnel-junction ther- mometry down to millikelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. Appl.4, 034001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.034001

2015 doi
[111]

Saira, O.-P., Kemppinen, A., Maisi, V.F., Pekola, J.P.: Vanishing quasiparticle density in a hybrid al/cu/al single-electron transistor. Phys. Rev. B85, 012504 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.012504

2012 doi
[112]

Esat, T., Yang, X., Mustafayev, F., Soltner, H., Tautz, F.S., Temirov, R.: Deter- mining the temperature of a millikelvin scanning tunnelling microscope junction. Commun. Phys.6, 81 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01201-4

2023 doi
[113]

Sethi, P., Prakash, O., Kaikkonen, J., Kervinen, M., Mannila, E.T., Ribeiro, M., Datta, D., F¨ orbom, C.W., Senior, J., Loreto, R.P., H¨ atinen, J., Viisanen, K., V¨ ayrynen, J.I., Ronzani, A., Kemppinen, A., Vesterinen, V., Prunnila, M., Gove- nius, J.: Native-oxide-passivate...

2025 doi
[114]

Wiley, New York (1982)

Barone, A., Paterno, G.: Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect. Wiley, New York (1982). https://doi.org/10.1002/352760278X

1982 doi
[115]

Pis’ma Zh

Aronov, A.G., Spivak, B.Z.: Photoeffect in a Josephson junction. Pis’ma Zh. 83 Eksp. Teor. Fiz.22, 218 (1975)

1975
[116]

JETP Lett.44, 682–686 (1986)

Gershenzon, M.E., Falei, M.I.: Absolute negative resistance of a tunnel con- tact between superconductors with a nonequilibrium quasiparticle distribution function. JETP Lett.44, 682–686 (1986)

1986
[117]

Gershenzon, M.E., Falei, M.I.: Absolute negative resistance in tunnel junctions of nonequilibrium superconductors. Sov. Phys. JETP67, 389 (1988)

1988
[118]

Gijsbertsen, J., Flokstra, J.: Quasiparticle injection-detection experiments in niobium. J. Appl. Phys.80(7), 3923–3933 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 363350

1996 doi
[119]

Chaudhuri, S., Maasilta, I.J.: Cooling, conductance, and thermometric perfor- mance of nonideal normal metal-superconductor tunnel junction pairs. Phys. Rev. B85, 014519 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.014519

2012 doi
[120]

Lucchesi, L., Paolucci, F.: Out-of-equilibrium nonlinear model of thermoelectric- ity in superconducting tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B112(18), 184509 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.112.184509

2025 doi
[121]

Whitney, R.S.: Thermodynamic and quantum bounds on nonlinear dc ther- moelectric transport. Phys. Rev. B87, 115404 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.87.115404

2013
[122]

Bu, Z., Zhang, X., Shan, B., Tang, J., Liu, H., Chen, Z., Lin, S., Li, W., Pei, Y.: Realizing a 14% single-leg thermoelectric efficiency in gete alloys. Sci. Adv. 7(19), 2738 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf2738

2021 doi
[123]

Li, W., Poudel, B., Kishore, R.A., Nozariasbmarz, A., Liu, N., Zhang, Y., Priya, S.: Toward high conversion efficiency of thermoelectric modules through syner- gistical optimization of layered materials. Adv. Mater.35(20), 2210407 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202210407

2023 doi
[124]

Frank, B., Krech, W.: Electronic cooling in superconducting tunnel junctions. Phys. Lett. A235(3), 281–284 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(97) 00627-0

1997 doi
[125]

Manninen, A.J., Suoknuuti, J.K., Leivo, M.M., Pekola, J.P.: Cooling of a super- conductor by quasiparticle tunneling. Appl. Phys. Lett.74(20), 3020–3022 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.124051

1999 doi
[126]

US20250054538A1, February 2025 84

Giazotto, F., Paolucci, F., Braggio, A., Marchegiani, G., Germanese, G.: Superconducting Bipolar Thermoelectric Memory and Method for Writing a Superconducting Bipolar Thermoelectric Memory. US20250054538A1, February 2025 84

2025
[127]

Germanese, G., Paolucci, F., Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Phase Control of Bipolar Thermoelectricity in Josephson Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. Appl.19(1), 014074 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014074

2023 doi
[128]

Johnson, J.B.: Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors. Phys. Rev.32, 97–109 (1928) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.32.97

1928 doi
[129]

Nyquist, H.: Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Phys. Rev.32, 110–113 (1928) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.32.110

1928 doi
[130]

Schottky, W.: ¨Uber spontane stromschwankungen in verschiedenen elek- trizit¨ atsleitern. Ann. Phys.362(23), 541–567 (1918) https://doi.org/10.1002/ andp.19183622304

1918
[131]

Nature562(7726), 240– 244 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0592-2

Shein Lumbroso, O., Simine, L., Nitzan, A., Segal, D., Tal, O.: Electronic noise due to temperature differences in atomic-scale junctions. Nature562(7726), 240– 244 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0592-2

2018 doi
[132]

Pierattelli, L., Taddei, F., Braggio, A.: ∆t-noise in multiterminal hybrid systems. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023321 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7. 023321

2025 doi
[133]

Physica7(4), 284–304 (1940) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0031-8914(40)90098-2

Kramers, H.A.: Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica7(4), 284–304 (1940) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0031-8914(40)90098-2

1940
[134]

H¨ anggi, P., Talkner, P., Borkovec, M.: Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers. Rev. Mod. Phys.62(2), 251 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.62.251

1990
[135]

Fulton, T.A., Dunkleberger, L.N.: Lifetime of the zero-voltage state in Joseph- son tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B9(11), 4760 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.9.4760

1974
[136]

Devoret, M.H., Martinis, J.M., Clarke, J.: Measurements of macroscopic quantum tunneling out of the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Joseph- son junction. Phys. Rev. Lett.55(18), 1908 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.55.1908

1908
[137]

Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Noise effects in the nonlinear ther- moelectricity of a Josephson junction. Appl. Phys. Lett.117(21) (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0029984

2020 doi
[138]

Rogovin, D., Scalapino, D.J.: Fluctuation phenomena in tunnel junctions. Ann. Phys.86(1), 1–90 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(74)90430-8

1974 doi
[139]

Levitov, L.S., Reznikov, M.: Counting statistics of tunneling current. Phys. Rev. 85 B70(11), 115305 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.115305

2004 doi
[140]

Golubev, D., Kuzmin, L.: Nonequilibrium theory of a hot-electron bolometer with normal metal-insulator-superconductor tunnel junction. J. Appl. Phys. 89(11), 6464–6472 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1351002

2001 doi
[141]

In: The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, pp

Risken, H.: Fokker-planck equation. In: The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, pp. 63–95. Springer, Berlin and New York (1989)

1989
[142]

World Scientific Series in Contemporary Chemical Physics, vol

Coffey, W.T., Kalmykov, Y.P., Waldron, J.T.: The Langevin Equation: With Applications to Stochastic Problems in Physics, Chemistry, and Electrical Engi- neering, 2nd edn. World Scientific Series in Contemporary Chemical Physics, vol. 14. World Scientific, Singapore (2004)

2004
[143]

Martinis, J.M., Devoret, M.H., Clarke, J.: Experimental tests for the quan- tum behavior of a macroscopic degree of freedom: The phase difference across a josephson junction. Phys. Rev. B35, 4682–4698 (1987) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.35.4682

1987
[144]

Nicol, J., Shapiro, S., Smith, P.H.: Direct measurement of the superconduct- ing energy gap. Phys. Rev. Lett.5, 461–464 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.5.461

1960
[145]

Giaever, I., Hart, H.R., Megerle, K.: Tunneling into superconductors at tem- peratures below 1°K. Phys. Rev.126, 941–948 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRev.126.941

1962
[146]

Taylor, B.N., Burstein, E.: Excess currents in electron tunneling between superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 14–17 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.10.14

1963
[147]

Tucker, J.: Quantum limited detection in tunnel junction mixers. IEEE J. Quan- tum Electron.15(11), 1234–1258 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1979. 1069931

1979 doi
[148]

Gurvitch, M., Washington, M.A., Huggins, H.A.: High quality refractory Joseph- son tunnel junctions utilizing thin aluminum layers. Appl. Phys. Lett.42(5), 472–474 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.93974

1983 doi
[149]

Nagel, J., Speer, D., Gaber, T., Sterck, A., Eichhorn, R., Reimann, P., Ilin, K., Siegel, M., Koelle, D., Kleiner, R.: Observation of negative absolute resistance in a Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett.100(21), 217001 (2008) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.217001

2008 doi
[150]

Germanese, G., Paolucci, F., Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Bipolar thermoelectric Josephson engine. Nat. Nanotechnol.17(10), 1084–1090 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01208-y 86

2022 doi
[151]

Jabdaraghi, R.N., Golubev, D.S., Pekola, J.P., Peltonen, J.T.: Noise of a super- conducting magnetic flux sensor based on a proximity Josephson junction. Sci. Rep.7(1), 8011 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08710-7

2017 doi
[152]

Dolan, G.J.: Offset masks for lift-off photoprocessing. Appl. Phys. Lett.31(5), 337–339 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.89690

1977 doi
[153]

Potts, A., Routley, P., Parker, G.J., Baumberg, J., De Groot, P.: Novel fabrication methods for submicrometer Josephson junction qubits. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron.12(4), 289–293 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1011279908265

2001 doi
[154]

Quantum Sci

Muthusubramanian, N., Finkel, M., Duivestein, P., Zachariadis, C., Meer, S.L., Veen, H.M., Beekman, M.W., Stavenga, T., Bruno, A., DiCarlo, L.: Wafer-scale uniformity of Dolan-bridge and bridgeless Manhattan-style Josephson junctions for superconducting quantum processors. Qua...

2024 doi
[155]

Morohashi, S., Hasuo, S., Yamaoka, T.: Self-aligned contact process for Nb/Al- AlOx /Nb Josephson junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett.48(3), 254–256 (1986) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.96573

1986 doi
[156]

Wu, X., Long, J., Ku, H.S., Lake, R., Bal, M., Pappas, D.P.: Overlap junctions for high coherence superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett.111(3) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993937

2017 doi
[157]

Nature 634(8032), 74–79 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07941-9

Van Damme, J., Massar, S., Acharya, R., Ivanov, T., Perez Lozano, D., Canvel, Y., Demarets, M., Vangoidsenhoven, D., Hermans, Y., Lai, J.,et al.: Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers. Nature 634(8032), 74–79 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s415...

2024 doi
[158]

Thin Solid Films239(1), 51–56 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90107-4

S¨ urgers, C., Strunk, C., L¨ ohneysen, H.V.: Effect of substrate temperature on the microstructure of thin niobium films. Thin Solid Films239(1), 51–56 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90107-4

1994 doi
[159]

Delacour, C., Ortega, L., Faucher, M., Crozes, T., Fournier, T., Pannetier, B., Bouchiat, V.: Persistence of superconductivity in niobium ultrathin films grown on r-plane sapphire. Phys. Rev. B.83(14), 144504 (2011) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.83.144504

2011
[160]

Nanotechnology24(37), 375304 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0957-4484/24/37/375304

Samaddar, S., Zanten, D., Fay, A., Sac´ ep´ e, B., Courtois, H., Winkelmann, C.B.: Niobium-based superconducting nano-device fabrication using all-metal sus- pended masks. Nanotechnology24(37), 375304 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0957-4484/24/37/375304

2013
[161]

physica status solidi (a)34(2), 541–546 87 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210340216

Alekseevskii, N.E., Sakosarenko, V.M., Bl¨ uthner, K., K¨ ohler, H.-J.: Supercon- ducting properties of vanadium films. physica status solidi (a)34(2), 541–546 87 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210340216

1976 doi
[162]

Thin Solid Films248(1), 18–27 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90204-6

Gutsche, M., Kraus, H., Jochum, J., Kemmather, B., Gutekunst, G.: Growth and characterization of epitaxial vanadium films. Thin Solid Films248(1), 18–27 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90204-6

1994 doi
[163]

Chubov, P., Eremenko, V., Pilipenko, Y.A.: Dependence of the critical temper- ature and energy gap on the thickness of superconducting aluminum films. Sov. Phys. JETP28, 389 (1969)

1969
[164]

Cherney, O.A.E., Shewchun, J.: Enhancement of superconductivity in thin alu- minium films. Can. J. Phys.47(10), 1101–1106 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1139/ p69-138

1969
[165]

Meservey, R., Tedrow, P.: Properties of very thin aluminum films. J. Appl. Phys. 42(1), 51–53 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1659648

1971 doi
[166]

Supercond

Court, N.A., Ferguson, A.J., Clark, R.G.: Energy gap measurement of nanos- tructured aluminium thin films for single Cooper-pair devices. Supercond. Sci. Technol.21(1), 015013 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/21/01/ 015013

2007 doi
[167]

Liu, T.J., Prestigiacomo, J.C., Adams, P.W.: Electrostatic tuning of the proximity-induced exchange field in EuS/Al bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 027207 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.027207

2013 doi
[168]

Nho, H., Connolly, T., Kurilovich, P.D., Diamond, S., Bøttcher, C.G.L., Glaz- man, L.I., Devoret, M.H.: Recovery dynamics of a gap-engineered transmon after a quasiparticle burst. Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 050601 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 1103/ql6q-wfpn

2026
[169]

Kaiser, N.: Review of the fundamentals of thin-film growth. Appl. Opt.41(16), 3053–3060 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.003053

2002 doi
[170]

Kunz, M., Niklasson, G.A., Granqvist, C.G.: Optical and electrical properties of sputter-deposited Al films close to the percolation threshold. J. Appl. Phys.64, 3740–3742 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.341372

1988 doi
[171]

In: Parks, R.D

Deutscher, G., Gennes, P.G.: Proximity effects. In: Parks, R.D. (ed.) Superconductivity vol. 2, pp. 1005–1034. Marcel Dekker, New York (1969).https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9780203737958- 5/proximity-effects-deutscher-de-gennes

1969 doi
[172]

Pannetier, B., Courtois, H.: Andreev reflection and proximity effect. J. Low Temp. Phys.118, 599–615 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004635226825 88

2000 doi
[173]

Giazotto, F., Peltonen, J.T., Meschke, M., Pekola, J.P.: Superconducting quan- tum interference proximity transistor. Nat. Phys.6(4), 254–259 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys1537

2010 doi
[174]

Fominov, Y.V., Feigel’man, M.V.: Superconductive properties of thin dirty superconductor–normal-metal bilayers. Phys. Rev. B63, 094518 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.094518

2001 doi
[175]

Devoret, M.H., Esteve, D., Grabert, H., Ingold, G.-L., Pothier, H., Urbina, C.: Effect of the electromagnetic environment on the Coulomb blockade in ultra- small tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 1824–1827 (1990) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1824

1990 doi
[176]

Cleland, A.N., Schmidt, J.M., Clarke, J.: Influence of the environment on the Coulomb blockade in submicrometer normal-metal tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B45, 2950–2961 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.45.2950

1992 doi
[177]

Holst, T., Esteve, D., Urbina, C., Devoret, M.H.: Effect of a transmission line resonator on a small capacitance tunnel junction. Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3455–3458 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3455

1994 doi
[178]

Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Phase-tunable thermoelectricity in a Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Res.2(4), 043091 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043091

2020
[179]

npj Quantum Inf

Antola, F., De Simoni, G., Giazotto, F., Braggio, A.: Quantum bipo- lar thermoelectricity. npj Quantum Inf. (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-026-01237-8

2026
[180]

ACS Appl

De Simoni, G., Battisti, S., Ligato, N., Mercaldo, M.T., Cuoco, M., Giazotto, F.: Gate control of the current–flux relation of a Josephson quantum interferometer based on proximitized metallic nanojuntions. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.3(9), 3927–3935 (2021) https://doi.org/10.10...

2021 doi
[181]

Ambegaokar, V., Baratoff, A.: Tunneling between superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 486–489 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.486

1963 doi
[182]

Kemppinen, A., Manninen, A.J., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., Vartiainen, J.J., Peltonen, J.T., Pekola, J.P.: Suppression of the critical current of a balanced superconducting quantum interference device. Appl. Phys. Lett.92(5), 052110 (2008) https:// doi.org/10.1063/1.2842413

2008 doi
[183]

Ronzani, A., Altimiras, C., Giazotto, F.: Balanced double-loop mesoscopic interferometer based on Josephson proximity nanojunctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(3), 032601 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4862477

2014 doi
[184]

Chiarello, F., Castellano, M.G., Torrioli, G., Poletto, S., Cosmelli, C., Carelli, 89 P., Balashov, D.V., Khabipov, M.I., Zorin, A.B.: An optimal tunable Josephson element for quantum computing. Appl. Phys. Lett.93(4), 042504 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.2960338

2008 doi
[185]

Fornieri, A., Blanc, C., Bosisio, R., D’ambrosio, S., Giazotto, F.: Nanoscale phase engineering of thermal transport with a Josephson heat modulator. Nat. Nanotechnol.11(3), 258–262 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.281

2016 doi
[186]

Jos´ e Mart ´ ınez-P´ erez, M., Giazotto, F.: A quantum diffractor for thermal flux. Nat. Commun.5(1), 3579 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4579

2014 doi
[187]

Rowell, J.M.: Magnetic Field Dependence of the Josephson Tunnel Current. Phys. Rev. Lett.11(5), 200–202 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 11.200

1963 doi
[188]

Chiodi, F., Ferrier, M., Gu´ eron, S., Cuevas, J.C., Montambaux, G., Fortuna, F., Kasumov, A., Bouchiat, H.: Geometry-related magnetic interference patterns in long SNS Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. B86(6), 064510 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.064510

2012 doi
[189]

Granata, C., Petti, L., Rippa, M., Rombetto, S., Ruggiero, B., Russo, M., Russo, R., Vettoliere, A.: Spatial modulation of critical current density in niobium based Josephson junctions induced by selective heating. Appl. Phys. Lett.102(22) (2013) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4809737

2013 doi
[190]

Trnjanin, N., Cools, I., Buccheri, V., Shvetsov, O., Bauch, T.: Magnetotrans- port properties of thin Josephson junctions for spectroscopic applications in the presence of large magnetic fields. Appl. Phys. Lett.127(7) (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0278518

2025 doi
[191]

Likharev, K.: Superconducting weak links. Rev. Mod. Phys.51(1), 101 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.51.101

1979 doi
[192]

Ambegaokar, V., Halperin, B.I.: Voltage due to thermal noise in the dc joseph- son effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 1364–1366 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.22.1364

1969
[193]

Guarcello, C., Braggio, A., Solinas, P., Giazotto, F.: Nonlinear critical-current thermal response of an asymmetric josephson tunnel junction. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 024002 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.024002

2019 doi
[194]

Guarcello, C., Braggio, A., Solinas, P., Pepe, G.P., Giazotto, F.: Josephson- threshold calorimeter. Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 054074 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevApplied.11.054074

2019
[195]

Nahum, M., Eiles, T.M., Martinis, J.M.: Electronic microrefrigerator based on a normal-insulator-superconductor tunnel junction. Appl. Phys. Lett.65(24), 90 3123–3125 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.112456

1994 doi
[196]

Leivo, M.M., Pekola, J.P., Averin, D.V.: Efficient Peltier refrigeration by a pair of normal metal/insulator/superconductor junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett.68(14), 1996–1998 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.115651

1996 doi
[197]

Wellstood, F.C., Urbina, C., Clarke, J.: Hot-electron effects in metals. Phys. Rev. B49(9), 5942 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.5942

1994 doi
[198]

Timofeev, A.V., Garc ´ ıa, C.P., Kopnin, N.B., Savin, A.M., Meschke, M., Gia- zotto, F., Pekola, J.P.: Recombination-Limited Energy Relaxation in a Bardeen- Cooper-Schrieffer Superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett.102(1), 017003 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017003

2009 doi
[199]

Rajauria, S., Courtois, H., Pannetier, B.: Quasiparticle-diffusion-based heating in superconductor tunneling microcoolers. Phys. Rev. B80(21), 214521 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.214521

2009 doi
[200]

O’Neil, G.C., Lowell, P.J., Underwood, J.M., Ullom, J.N.: Measurement and modeling of a large-area normal-metal/insulator/superconductor refrigerator with improved cooling. Phys. Rev. B85(13), 134504 (2012) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.85.134504

2012
[201]

Fornieri, A., Timossi, G., Virtanen, P., Solinas, P., Giazotto, F.: 0–πphase- controllable thermal Josephson junction. Nat. Nanotechnol.12, 425–429 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.25

2017 doi
[202]

Hijano, A., Bergeret, F.S., Giazotto, F., Braggio, A.: Bipolar thermoelectric- ity in S/I/NS and S/I/SN superconducting tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122(24), 242603 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152705

2023 doi
[203]

Oxford University Press, Oxford (1936)

Mott, N.F., Jones, H.: The Theory of the Properties of Metals and Alloys. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1936)

1936
[204]

Thierschmann, H., S´ anchez, R., Sothmann, B., Arnold, F., Heyn, C., Hansen, W., Buhmann, H., Molenkamp, L.W.: Three-terminal energy harvester with cou- pled quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol.10(10), 854–858 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nnano.2015.176

2015 doi
[205]

Josefsson, M., Svilans, A., Burke, A.M., Hoffmann, E.A., Fahlvik, S., The- lander, C., Leijnse, M., Linke, H.: A quantum-dot heat engine operating close to the thermodynamic efficiency limits. Nat. Nanotechnol.13(10), 920–924 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0200-5

2018 doi
[206]

Jaliel, G., Puddy, R.K., S´ anchez, R., Jordan, A.N., Sothmann, B., Farrer, I., Griffiths, J.P., Ritchie, D.A., Smith, C.G.: Experimental Realization of a Quan- tum Dot Energy Harvester. Phys. Rev. Lett.123(11), 117701 (2019) https: 91 //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.117701

2019 doi
[207]

In: Sohn, L.L., Kouwen- hoven, L.P., Sch¨ on, G

Kouwenhoven, L.P., Marcus, C.M., McEuen, P.L., Tarucha, S., Westervelt, R.M., Wingreen, N.S.: Electron transport in quantum dots. In: Sohn, L.L., Kouwen- hoven, L.P., Sch¨ on, G. (eds.) Mesoscopic Electron Transport. NATO ASI Series E, vol. 345, pp. 105–214. Springer, Dordrech...

1997
[208]

Werthamer, N.R.: Nonlinear self-coupling of Josephson radiation in supercon- ducting tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev.147(1), 255 (1966) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRev.147.255

1966
[209]

Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York (1986)

Likharev, K.K.: Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Cir- cuits. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York (1986). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781315141572/dynamics- Josephson-junctions-circuits-konstantin-likharev

1986 doi
[210]

Pekola, J.P.: Towards quantum thermodynamics in electronic circuits. Nat. Phys.11(2), 118–123 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3169

2015 doi
[211]

Supercond

Semenov, A.D., Gol’tsman, G.N., Sobolewski, R.: Hot-electron effect in super- conductors and its applications for radiation sensors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 15(4), 1–16 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/15/4/201

2002 doi
[212]

Morozov, D.V., Casaburi, A., Hadfield, R.H.: Superconducting photon detec- tors. Contemp. Phys.62(2), 69–91 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514. 2022.2043596

2022
[213]

Inomata, K., Lin, Z., Koshino, K., Oliver, W.D., Tsai, J.-S., Yamamoto, T., Nakamura, Y.: Single microwave-photon detector using an artificialλ-type three-level system. Nat. Commun.7(1), 12303 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms12303

2016
[214]

Irwin, K.D.: An application of electrothermal feedback for high resolution cryo- genic particle detection. Appl. Phys. Lett.66(15), 1998–2000 (1995) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.113674

1998 doi
[215]

In: Enss, C

Irwin, K.D., Hilton, G.C.: Transition-edge sensors. In: Enss, C. (ed.) Cryogenic Particle Detection. Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 99, pp. 63–150. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/10933596 3

2005 doi
[216]

Nature 425(6960), 817–821 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02037

Day, P.K., LeDuc, H.G., Mazin, B.A., Vayonakis, A., Zmuidzinas, J.: A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays. Nature 425(6960), 817–821 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02037

2003 doi
[217]

AIP Conf

Mazin, B.A.: Microwave kinetic inductance detectors: The first decade. AIP Conf. Proc.1185(1), 135–142 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3292300 92

2009 doi
[218]

Gol’Tsman, G.N., Okunev, O., Chulkova, G., Lipatov, A., Semenov, A., Smirnov, K., Voronov, B., Dzardanov, A., Williams, C., Sobolewski, R.: Picosecond super- conducting single-photon optical detector. Appl. Phys. Lett.79(6), 705–707 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1388868

2001 doi
[219]

Supercond

Natarajan, C.M., Tanner, M.G., Hadfield, R.H.: Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25(6), 063001 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001

2012 doi
[220]

Heikkil¨ a, T.T., Ojaj¨ arvi, R., Maasilta, I.J., Strambini, E., Giazotto, F., Bergeret, F.S.: Thermoelectric radiation detector based on superconductor-ferromagnet systems. Phys. Rev. Appl.10(3), 034053 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.10.034053

2018
[221]

Chakraborty, S., Heikkil¨ a, T.T.: Thermoelectric radiation detector based on a superconductor-ferromagnet junction: Calorimetric regime. J. Appl. Phys. 124(12) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037405

2018 doi
[222]

Lucchesi, L., Paolucci, F.: Graphene-insulator-superconductor junctions as ther- moelectric bolometers. Phys. Rev. Appl.25(5), 054073 (2026) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/dh9z-bs5h

2026 doi
[223]

IEEE Trans

Lucchesi, L., Paolucci, F.: Superconductor-insulator-2-d semiconductor junc- tions as thermoelectric bolometers. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.36(6), 2402305–2402305 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2026.3688268

2026
[224]

Paolucci, F., Germanese, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: A highly sensitive broad- band superconducting thermoelectric single-photon detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122(17), 173503 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145544

2023 doi
[225]

Lamoreaux, S.K., Van Bibber, K.A., Lehnert, K.W., Carosi, G.: Analysis of single-photon and linear amplifier detectors for microwave cavity dark matter axion searches. Phys. Rev. D88(3), 035020 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.88.035020

2013
[226]

Dixit, A.V., Chakram, S., He, K., Agrawal, A., Naik, R.K., Schuster, D.I., Chou, A.: Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(14), 141302 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141302

2021 doi
[227]

Tonouchi, M.: Cutting-edge terahertz technology. Nat. Photonics1(2), 97–105 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.3

2007 doi
[228]

Hadfield, R.H.: Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information appli- cations. Nat. Photonics3(12), 696–705 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton. 2009.230

2009 doi
[229]

Pekola, J.P., Karimi, B.: Colloquium: Quantum heat transport in condensed 93 matter systems. Rev. Mod. Phys.93(4), 041001 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.93.041001

2021
[230]

Li, N., Ren, J., Wang, L., Zhang, G., H¨ anggi, P., Li, B.: Colloquium: Phononics: Manipulating heat flow with electronic analogs and beyond. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84(3), 1045–1066 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1045

2012 doi
[231]

Terraneo, M., Peyrard, M., Casati, G.: Controlling the energy flow in nonlinear lattices: a model for a thermal rectifier. Phys. Rev. Lett.88(9), 094302 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.094302

2002 doi
[232]

Li, B., Wang, L., Casati, G.: Thermal diode: Rectification of heat flux. Phys. Rev. Lett.93(18), 184301 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.184301

2004 doi
[233]

Segal, D., Nitzan, A.: Spin-boson thermal rectifier. Phys. Rev. Lett.94(3), 034301 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.034301

2005 doi
[234]

Otey, C.R., Lau, W.T., Fan, S.: Thermal rectification through vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 154301 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104. 154301

2010 doi
[235]

Ben-Abdallah, P., Biehs, S.-A.: Phase-change radiative thermal diode. Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 191907 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4829799

2013 doi
[236]

AIP Adv.5(5), 053301 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915899

Fornieri, A., Mart ´ ınez-P´ erez, M.J., Giazotto, F.: Electronic heat current rec- tification in hybrid superconducting devices. AIP Adv.5(5), 053301 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915899

2015 doi
[237]

Mart ´ ınez-P´ erez, M.J., Fornieri, A., Giazotto, F.: Rectification of electronic heat current by a hybrid thermal diode. Nat. Nanotechnol.10(4), 303–307 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.11

2015 doi
[238]

Supercond

Antola, F., Braggio, A., De Simoni, G., Giazotto, F.: Tunable thermoelectric superconducting heat pipe and diode. Supercond. Sci. Technol.37(11), 115023 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad7d40

2024 doi
[239]

Mart ´ ınez-P´ erez, M.J., Giazotto, F.: Efficient phase-tunable Josephson thermal rectifier. Appl. Phys. Lett.102(18) (2013) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4804550

2013 doi
[240]

Khomchenko, I., Ouerdane, H., Benenti, G.: Voltage-amplified heat rectifica- tion in sis junctions. Phys. Rev. B106, 245413 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.106.245413

2022
[241]

Esaki, L.: New phenomenon in narrow germanium p- n junctions. Phys. Rev. 109(2), 603 (1958) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.109.603

1958 doi
[242]

IEEE Trans

Holmes, D.S., Ripple, A.L., Manheimer, M.A.: Energy-efficient superconducting computing—power budgets and requirements. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 94 23(3), 1701610–1701610 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2013.2244634

2013
[243]

Alam, S., Hossain, M.S., Srinivasa, S.R., Aziz, A.: Cryogenic memory technologies. Nat. Electron.6(3), 185–198 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41928-023-00930-2

2023
[244]

relaxation-oscillations

Pol, B.: Lxxxviii. on “relaxation-oscillations”. Philos. Mag.2(11), 978–992 (1926) https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442608564127

1926 doi
[245]

Vernon Jr, F.L., Pedersen, R.J.: Relaxation oscillations in Josephson junctions. J. Appl. Phys.39(6), 2661–2664 (1968) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1656649

1968 doi
[246]

Adelerhof, D.J., Nijstad, H., Flokstra, J., Rogalla, H.: (Double) relaxation oscil- lation squids with high flux-to-voltage transfer: Simulations and experiments. J. Appl. Phys.76(6), 3875–3886 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.357392

1994 doi
[247]

IEEE Microw

Aumentado, J.: Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in Josephson parametric amplifiers. IEEE Microw. Mag.21(8), 45–59 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2020.2993476

2020
[248]

Science350(6258), 307–310 (2015) https://doi.org/10

Macklin, C., O’brien, K., Hover, D., Schwartz, M.E., Bolkhovsky, V., Zhang, X., Oliver, W.D., Siddiqi, I.: A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier. Science350(6258), 307–310 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.aaa8525

2015
[249]

Instruments8(4) (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments8040047

De Lucia, M., Dal Bo, P., Di Giorgi, E., Lari, T., Puglia, C., Paolucci, F.: Transition Edge Sensors: Physics and Applications. Instruments8(4) (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments8040047

2024 doi
[250]

Supercond

McCaughan, A.N.: Readout architectures for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Supercond. Sci. Technol.31, 10–1088 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-6668/aaa1b3

2018 doi
[251]

Ekinci, K.L., Roukes, M.L.: Nanoelectromechanical systems. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76(6) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1927327

2005 doi
[252]

Ivanov, B.I., Trgala, M., Grajcar, M., Il’ichev, E., Meyer, H.-G.: Cryogenic ultra- low-noise sige transistor amplifier. Rev. Sci. Instrum.82(10) (2011) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.3655448

2011 doi
[253]

https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2603.23400

Trupiano, G., De Simoni, G., Giazotto, F.: A Zero-Bias Superconducting Voltage Amplifier Based on the Bipolar Thermoelectric Effect (2026). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2603.23400 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23400

2026 doi
[254]

Averin, D.V., Likharev, K.K.: Coulomb blockade of single-electron tunneling, and coherent oscillations in small tunnel junctions. J. Low Temp. Phys.62(3–4), 345–373 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00683469 95

1986 doi
[255]

Fulton, T.A., Dolan, G.J.: Observation of single-electron charging effects in small tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1), 109 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.59.109

1987
[256]

Beenakker, C.W.J., Staring, A.A.M.: Theory of the thermopower of a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B46(15), 9667 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.46. 9667

1992 doi
[257]

Europhys

Staring, A.A.M., Molenkamp, L.W., Alphenaar, B.W., Van Houten, H., Buyk, O.J.A., Mabesoone, M.A.A., Beenakker, C.W.J., Foxon, C.T.: Coulomb- blockade oscillations in the thermopower of a quantum dot. Europhys. Lett. 22(1), 57–62 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/22/1/011

1993 doi
[258]

Turek, M., Matveev, K.A.: Cotunneling thermopower of single electron transis- tors. Phys. Rev. B65(11), 115332 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 65.115332

2002 doi
[259]

Turek, M., Siewert, J., Richter, K.: Thermopower of a superconducting single- electron transistor. Phys. Rev. B71(22), 220503 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.71.220503

2005
[260]

In: Single Charge Tunneling: Coulomb Blockade Phenomena in Nanostructures, pp

Devoret, M.H., Grabert, H.: Introduction to single charge tunneling. In: Single Charge Tunneling: Coulomb Blockade Phenomena in Nanostructures, pp. 1–19. Springer, New York (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2166-9 1

1992 doi
[261]

Tuominen, M.T., Hergenrother, J.M., Tighe, T.S., Tinkham, M.: Experimen- tal evidence for parity-based 2e periodicity in a superconducting single-electron tunneling transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett.69(13), 1997 (1992) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.69.1997

1997
[262]

Joyez, P., Lafarge, P., Filipe, A., Esteve, D., Devoret, M.H.: Observation of parity-induced suppression of Josephson tunneling in the superconducting single electron transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett.72(15), 2458 (1994) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.72.2458

1994
[263]

Science276(5312), 579–582 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5312.579

Yoo, M.J., Fulton, T.A., Hess, H.F., Willett, R.L., Dunkleberger, L.N., Chich- ester, R.J., Pfeiffer, L.N., West, K.W.: Scanning single-electron transistor microscopy: Imaging individual charges. Science276(5312), 579–582 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5312.579

1997 doi
[264]

Aumentado, J., Keller, M.W., Martinis, J.M., Devoret, M.H.: Nonequilibrium quasiparticles and 2eperiodicity in single-cooper-pair transistors. Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 066802 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.066802

2004 doi
[265]

Bagrets, D.A., Nazarov, Y.V.: Full counting statistics of charge transfer in coulomb blockade systems. Phys. Rev. B67, 085316 (2003) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.67.085316 96

2003
[266]

Hicks, L.D., Dresselhaus, M.S.: Effect of quantum-well structures on the ther- moelectric figure of merit. Phys. Rev. B47(19), 12727 (1993) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727

1993 doi
[267]

Zuev, Y.M., Chang, W., Kim, P.: Thermoelectric and magnetothermoelectric transport measurements of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett.102(9), 096807 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096807

2009 doi
[268]

Bernazzani, L., Marchegiani, G., Giazotto, F., Roddaro, S., Braggio, A.: Bipolar Thermoelectricity in Bilayer-Graphene–Superconductor Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. Appl.19(4), 044017 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19. 044017

2023 doi
[269]

Castro, E.V., Novoselov, K.S., Morozov, S.V., Peres, N., Dos Santos, J.L., Nils- son, J., Guinea, F., Geim, A.K., Castro Neto, A.H.: Biased bilayer graphene: semiconductor with a gap tunable by the electric field effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(21), 216802 (2007) https://doi.org/1...

2007 doi
[270]

Nature459(7248), 820–823 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08105

Zhang, Y., Tang, T., Girit, C., Hao, Z., Martin, M.C., Zettl, A., Crommie, M.F., Shen, Y.R., Wang, F.: Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature459(7248), 820–823 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08105

2009
[271]

McCann, E.: Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B74(16), 161403 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.74.161403

2006
[272]

McCann, E., Koshino, M.: The electronic properties of bilayer graphene. Rep. Prog. Phys.76(5), 056503 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/5/ 056503

2013 doi
[273]

Bianco, F., Zhang, D., Paolucci, F.: Coexistence of linear and non-linear thermo- electricity in graphene-superconductor tunnel junctions. J. Appl. Phys.136(15) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227501

2024 doi
[274]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.02123 (2026)

Lucchesi, L., Paolucci, F.: Strong nonlinear thermoelectricity generation and close-to-carnot efficient heat engines in superconductor-insulator-2d electron gas junctions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.02123 (2026)

2026 arXiv
[275]

Guarcello, C., Citro, R., Giazotto, F., Braggio, A.: Bipolar thermoelectrical SQUIPT (BTSQUIPT). Appl. Phys. Lett.123(15), 152601 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1063/5.0169267

2023 doi
[276]

Usadel, K.D.: Generalized diffusion equation for superconducting alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett.25(8), 507 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.507

1970 doi
[277]

Giazotto, F., Taddei, F.: Hybrid superconducting quantum magnetometer. Phys. 97 Rev. B84, 214502 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.214502

2011 doi
[278]

Hao, X., Moodera, J., Meservey, R.: Thin-film superconductor in an exchange field. Phys. Rev. Lett.67(10), 1342 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.67.1342

1991
[279]

Germanese, G., Paolucci, F., Marchegiani, G., Braggio, A., Giazotto, F.: Spontaneous symmetry breaking induced thermospin effect in superconducting tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B104(18), 184502 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.104.184502

2021
[280]

Bauer, G.E.W., Saitoh, E., Van Wees, B.J.: Spin caloritronics. Nat. Mater.11(5), 391–399 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3301

2012 doi
[281]

Linder, J., Robinson, J.W.A.: Superconducting spintronics. Nat. Phys.11(4), 307–315 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3242

2015 doi
[282]

Science282(5390), 932–935 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.282.5390.932

Fujisawa, T., Oosterkamp, T.H., Wiel, W.G., Broer, B.W., Aguado, R., Tarucha, S., Kouwenhoven, L.P.: Spontaneous Emission Spectrum in Double Quan- tum Dot Devices. Science282(5390), 932–935 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.282.5390.932

1998
[283]

Aguado, R., Kouwenhoven, L.P.: Double Quantum Dots as Detectors of High- Frequency Quantum Noise in Mesoscopic Conductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.84(9), 1986–1989 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1986

1986 doi
[284]

Science301(5630), 203– 206 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084175

Deblock, R., Onac, E., Gurevich, L., Kouwenhoven, L.P.: Detection of Quantum Noise from an Electrically Driven Two-Level System. Science301(5630), 203– 206 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084175

2003 doi
[285]

Billangeon, P.-M., Pierre, F., Bouchiat, H., Deblock, R.: Emission and Absorp- tion Asymmetry in the Quantum Noise of a Josephson Junction. Phys. Rev. Lett.96(13), 136804 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.136804

2006 doi
[286]

Basset, J., Bouchiat, H., Deblock, R.: Emission and Absorption Quantum Noise Measurement with an On-Chip Resonant Circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett.105(16), 166801 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.166801

2010 doi
[287]

Basset, J., Bouchiat, H., Deblock, R.: High-frequency quantum admittance and noise measurement with an on-chip resonant circuit. Phys. Rev. B85(8), 085435 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085435

2012 doi
[288]

Pekola, J.P., Hekking, F.W.J.: Normal-metal-superconductor tunnel junction as a brownian refrigerator. Phys. Rev. Lett.98(21), 210604 (2007) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.210604

2007 doi
[289]

Peltonen, J.T., Helle, M., Timofeev, A.V., Solinas, P., Hekking, F.W.J., Pekola, 98 J.P.: Brownian refrigeration by hybrid tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B84, 144505 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.144505

2011 doi
[290]

Hofer, P.P., Souquet, J.-R., Clerk, A.A.: Quantum heat engine based on photon- assisted cooper pair tunneling. Phys. Rev. B93(4), 041418 (2016) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.041418

2016 doi
[291]

Tan, K.Y., Partanen, M., Lake, R.E., Govenius, J., Masuda, S., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Quantum-circuit refrigerator. Nat. Commun.8(1), 15189 (2017) https://doi. org/10.1038/ncomms15189

2017 doi
[292]

Silveri, M., Grabert, H., Masuda, S., Tan, K.Y., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Theory of quantum-circuit refrigeration by photon-assisted electron tunneling. Phys. Rev. B96, 094524 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094524

2017 doi
[293]

Mecklenburg, M., Kubala, B., Ankerhold, J.: Thermopower and dynamical Coulomb blockade in nonclassical environments. Phys. Rev. B96(15), 155405 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.155405

2017 doi
[294]

Rossell´ o, G., L´ opez, R., S´ anchez, R.: Dynamical Coulomb blockade of ther- mal transport. Phys. Rev. B95(23), 235404 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.95.235404

2017
[295]

Hicks, L.D., Dresselhaus, M.S.: Thermoelectric figure of merit of a one- dimensional conductor. Phys. Rev. B47, 16631–16634 (1993) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.16631

1993 doi
[296]

Dresselhaus, M.S., Chen, G., Tang, M.Y., Yang, R.G., Lee, H., Wang, D.Z., Ren, Z.F., Fleurial, J.-P., Gogna, P.: New directions for low-dimensional thermoelec- tric materials. Adv. Mater.19(8), 1043–1053 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1002/ adma.200600527

2007
[297]

S´ anchez, R., B¨ uttiker, M.: Optimal energy quanta to current conversion. Phys. Rev. B83(8), 085428 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.085428

2011 doi
[298]

Jordan, A.N., Sothmann, B., S´ anchez, R., B¨ uttiker, M.: Powerful and efficient energy harvester with resonant-tunneling quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B87(7), 075312 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.075312

2013 doi
[299]

Tien, P.K., Gordon, J.P.: Multiphoton process observed in the interaction of microwave fields with the tunneling between superconductor films. Phys. Rev. 129(2), 647 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.129.647

1963 doi
[300]

Cailleaux, S., Ficheux, Q., Roch, N., Basko, D.M.: Theory of the photonic Joule effect in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett.134(22), 227001 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.227001 99

2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Giaever, I.: Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett.5(4), 147 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.147

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.5.147 1960

[2] [2]

Giaever, I.: Electron tunneling between two superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 5(10), 464 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.464

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.5.464 1960

[3] [3]

Josephson, B.D.: Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1(7), 251–253 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0

doi:10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0 1962

[4] [4]

Anderson, P.W., Rowell, J.M.: Probable observation of the Josephson supercon- ducting tunneling effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.10(6), 230 (1963) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.10.230

1963

[5] [5]

Bardeen, J.: Tunneling into superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 147–149 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.147

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.9.147 1962

[6] [6]

Jaklevic, R.C., Lambe, J., Silver, A.H., Mercereau, J.E.: Quantum interference effects in josephson tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett.12(7), 159 (1964) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.159

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.159 1964

[7] [7]

(eds.): The SQUID Handbook: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, Volume I

Clarke, J., Braginski, A.I. (eds.): The SQUID Handbook: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, Volume I. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany (2004)

2004

[8] [9]

Shapiro, S.: Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling: The effect of microwaves and other observations. Phys. Rev. Lett.11(2), 80 (1963) https: 74 //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.80

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.80 1963