Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantum power: a Lorentz invariant approach to Hawking radiation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.15148 v1 pith:ILVJI2YL submitted 2021-11-30 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

classification gr-qchep-thquant-ph
keywords blackequationfracradiationacceleratingalphahbarhole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Particle radiation from black holes has an observed emission power depending on the surface gravity $\kappa = c^4/(4GM)$ as \begin{equation}\nonumber P_{\textrm{black hole}} \sim \frac{\hbar \kappa^2}{6\pi c^2} = \frac{\hbar c^6}{96\pi G^2 M^2}\,,\end{equation} while both the radiation from accelerating particles and moving mirrors (accelerating boundaries) obey similar relativistic Larmor powers, \begin{equation}\nonumber P_{\textrm{electron}}= \frac{q^2\alpha^2}{6\pi \epsilon_0 c^3}\,, \quad P_{\textrm{mirror}} =\frac{\hbar \alpha^2}{6\pi c^2}\,, \end{equation} where $\alpha$ is the Lorentz invariant proper acceleration. This equivalence between the Lorentz invariant powers suggests a close relation that could be used to understand black hole radiation. We show that an accelerating mirror with a prolonged metastable acceleration plateau can provide a unitary, thermal, energy-conserved analog model for black hole decay.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TheUse of Conditional Variational Autoencoders in Generating Stellar Spectra

    astro-ph.SR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    The manuscript is internally inconsistent: the abstract and full text describe different papers, so the stated result cannot be assessed.

Pith tools