Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Movable Antenna-Assisted Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that letting base-station antennas move within a small area can raise integrated sensing-and-communication performance by over 50% while using less power.

desk verdict Solid incremental extension of MA-ISAC to dual-sided 2D movable antennas, but the rank-one SDR tightness proof has a real gap and the simulation reporting is too thin to back the headline numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01217 v1 pith:IRUDLK7X submitted 2025-01-02 eess.SP

Chengjun Jiang , Chensi Zhang , Chongwen Huang , Jianhua Ge , Dusit Niyato , Chau Yuen This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords integratedsensingandcommunicationmovableantennapositionoptimizationbeamformingdesignSINRsuccessiveconvexapproximationsemidefiniterelaxation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the spatial degrees of freedom of movable antennas are not just a communication asset but a sensing asset in an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system. It proposes a design where both the transmit and receive arrays of a bistatic base station carry antennas that can shift position within a small two-dimensional region, and it optimizes those positions together with the transmit and receive beamformers. The target is to maximize sensing SINR while keeping every user's communication SINR above a required threshold. The paper reports that this dual-sided movable-antenna design outperforms single-sided and fixed-position baselines, with gains exceeding 50% in sensing SINR and a power saving of about 7 dB for equal sensing performance. If these results hold, movable antennas become a concrete way to get better ISAC performance without more antennas, more RF chains, or more transmit power.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is an alternating-optimization loop that cycles through three subproblems: a closed-form MVDR receive beamformer, a transmit-beamforming problem recast through the Charnes-Cooper transform and semidefinite relaxation (with a proof that the relaxed solution is rank-one), and a position-update step that replaces the nonconvex sensing-SINR and communication-SINR functions with second-order Taylor bounds inside a successive convex approximation. The channel model that makes position a variable is the field-response model, in which each propagation path contributes a phase that depends linearly on the antenna coordinates, so moving an antenna reshapes the array response vectors. This joint treatment is what lets the algorithm exploit the added spatial degrees of freedom for both sensing gain and interference suppression.

What would settle it

For a random channel realization where the two rank-one matrices in Appendix A have nearly parallel principal directions, solve $P_{3.2}$ and check whether any optimal solution has rank above one; if it does, the SDR tightness argument and the SVD extraction of the transmit beamformers fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that an ISAC base station whose transmit and receive arrays both use movable antennas, with positions optimized jointly with the beamformers, achieves a sensing SINR about 57.54% higher than an otherwise identical fixed-position array at 25 dBm, and reaches the fixed-array sensing SINR with roughly 7 dB less transmit power (18 dBm versus 25 dBm). The optimization objective is sensing SINR, constrained by per-user communication SINR thresholds, and the gains come from using the added spatial degrees of freedom both to sharpen the target response and to suppress clutter echoes. The same framework also shows that deploying movable antennas on only one side of the link already helps, with receive-side movement providing larger sensing gains than transmit-side movement in the simulated scenarios.

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the relaxed transmit-beamforming problem has rank-one solutions assumes that subtracting the two one-dimensional channel terms from the positive-definite matrix $A$ still leaves a remainder of rank at least $N-1$, but that assumption is asserted without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Deploying movable antennas on both the transmit and receive arrays of an ISAC base station yields a 57.54% higher sensing SINR than fixed-position antennas at the same 25 dBm transmit power.
  • The same dual-sided MA design reaches the sensing SINR of a fixed-antenna system at about 18 dBm instead of 25 dBm, a saving of roughly 7 dB.
  • Single-sided MA deployments also help, with receive-side MAs providing larger gains than transmit-side MAs in the simulated scenarios.
  • The benefit of enlarging the antenna movement region saturates around a 2.6-wavelength side length, so the gain does not require unbounded antenna travel.
  • MA-assisted ISAC maintains stable sensing performance as communication SINR thresholds rise, losing about 1 dB when both user thresholds go from -5 dB to 20 dB.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to scale the user count and clutter count; the simulations fix K=2 and L=2, so whether the 57% gain survives denser interference is untested in the paper.
  • If the rank-one SDR proof is generically valid only when the two rank-one channel matrices are well separated in eigenstructure, then worst-case channel alignments may require a different extraction procedure; the paper does not explore this.
  • The saturation of gain with movement area suggests a design rule of thumb—size the MA region to about 2.6 wavelengths—which could be tested in a prototype.
  • Because receive-side MAs contributed more than transmit-side MAs in every simulated sweep, a resource-constrained deployment could start with moving receive antennas only and still capture most of the benefit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system in which both the base-station transmitter and receiver are equipped with movable antennas (MAs) whose two-dimensional positions can be optimized. The authors formulate the problem of maximizing the sensing SINR subject to per-user communication SINR constraints and a transmit power constraint, and they propose an alternating optimization (AO) algorithm. The algorithm alternates between closed-form receive beamforming, transmit beamforming obtained via the Charnes-Cooper transform and semidefinite relaxation (SDR), and successive convex approximation (SCA) based updates of the transmit and receive antenna positions. Simulation results are reported showing that the proposed scheme outperforms fixed-position-antenna (FPA) and single-sided MA baselines, including a claimed 57.54% sensing SINR improvement over FPA at 25 dBm and an ability to match FPA's 25 dBm performance using only 18 dBm transmit power.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution to the emerging MA-ISAC literature: it extends MA position optimization to both ends of an ISAC link, includes clutter sensing, and provides a complete AO/SCA-style algorithm with complexity analysis. The work is independently grounded in the sense that the reported gains are evaluated against external FPA and single-sided MA baselines, and no fitted constants or self-referential derivations appear in the core numerical claims. The main risk is the unsupported SDR tightness proof, which is load-bearing for the transmit beamforming extraction and therefore for the headline simulation numbers.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (56)] The proof of Theorem 1 asserts that Z_k = A - zeta * Htilde_d - bar_lambda_k * Hhat_k satisfies rank(Z_k) >= N - 1 after subtracting two rank-one positive semidefinite matrices from A ≻ 0. This does not follow from any stated property: by Weyl's inequality or simple rank subadditivity, subtracting two rank-one matrices can reduce the rank by up to two, so only rank(Z_k) >= N - 2 is guaranteed in general. The observation that the maximum eigenvalues of Htilde_d and Hhat_k are different does not prevent two eigenvalues of A from being reduced to zero after both subtractions, and positive semidefiniteness of Z_k does not change that. Since Eq. (56) is the only input to the Sylvester inequality step (57) used to conclude rank(X_k) <= 1, the rank-one tightness of the SDR is not proved. If a returned X_k has rank 2, the SVD extraction of w_n from W_n^* = X_n / ell is not feasible, and the transmit beamformer subsequently used in the position updates (P4.1, P5.1) may violate the SINR constraints. No Gaussian randomization or other rank-recovery fallback is described. I ask the authors to either supply a rigorous proof of (56), or re-frame Theorem 1 as a heuristic claim and add a rank-recovery procedure with numerical validation of the rank-one property.
  2. [Section III-E, convergence] The convergence statement is asserted rather than proved. The text says 'the convergence is ensured by the presence of an upper power bound and the non-decreasing nature of each iteration,' but it does not establish that each subproblem update (20), P3/P3.1, P4.1, and P5.1 is individually monotone in the sensing SINR, nor that the SCA surrogate updates satisfy the standard sufficient decrease conditions, nor that an upper bound on the objective exists across the feasible set. The termination criterion in Algorithm 1 therefore has no proven basis, and the claim that the algorithm 'generally achieves convergence after 20 iterations' in Fig. 2 is an empirical observation without a supporting argument. Please provide a formal convergence proof for the AO-SCA scheme, or state the specific assumptions under which monotone convergence holds.
  3. [Section IV, simulation setup] The simulation section does not report Monte Carlo details, making the quantitative claims difficult to verify. The first paragraph of Section IV specifies K=2, L=2, locations, path counts, and user path response distributions, but the target and clutter PRVs are only said to be 'configured appropriately,' the Rician factor kappa and the exact path loss exponents are not fully tied to the displayed curves, and no number of channel realizations, seed information, or averaging procedure is given. The headline percentages (57.54% at 25 dBm in Fig. 3, 38.43%, 21.12%, 77.67% in Fig. 7) appear to be point estimates without error bars or confidence intervals. Please add a complete parameter table, specify how many independent channel realizations are averaged, and report error bars or at least the range across realizations for the main comparison curves.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section I-C] The organization paragraph states that conclusions are presented in Section VI, but the conclusions appear in Section V; please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Section IV, paragraph before benchmarks] The word 'T ag/Benchmark' contains a typo; it should read 'Tag/Benchmark' or 'Benchmark schemes.'
  3. [Algorithm 1, line 6] In the receive antenna update, the condition is written as '1 ≤ b ≠ m ≤ N,' but the receive antenna index set is of size M, not N; this should be '1 ≤ b ≠ m ≤ M.'
  4. [Notation, Section I-C] The notation paragraph uses 'R(s)' for the real part but the main text later uses the symbol ℜ; please unify the notation.
  5. [Equations (34)-(35)] The bounds involving the Hessians use both ||·||_2 and ||·||_F in the same chain; please clarify the norm being bounded and ensure the inequalities are written consistently.
  6. [Section V, conclusion] The claim that the proposed scheme at 18 dBm matches FPA at 25 dBm is stated without a direct comparison point in the text of Fig. 3; please indicate the corresponding operating point in the figure or state it explicitly in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MA-ISAC gains are simulation outputs evaluated against external FPA and single-sided MA baselines, and the self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an algorithmic comparison: an alternating optimization and SCA routine maximizes sensing SINR by jointly optimizing Tx/Rx MA positions, transmit beamformers, and the receive combiner, and the reported gains (57.54% over FPA at 25 dBm, and the 18 dBm vs 25 dBm equivalence) are direct simulation outputs of the same objective on the same random channels for all schemes. No fitted constants are introduced, no parameter is calibrated to the benchmark outputs, and no derived quantity is renamed as a prediction. The cited prior work by the authors ([14], [17], [34], and co-authored [40], [41]) appears only as related-work references and is not used to justify the optimization steps or the numerical results. The mathematical weakness in Appendix A—the unproved rank bound N−1≤rank(Z_k)≤N after subtracting two rank-one matrices from a positive definite matrix—is a correctness risk in the SDR tightness proof, not a circular reduction; the performance comparison does not presuppose the rank-one conclusion. Therefore no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data. The central claim rests on standard far-field channel modeling, perfect CSI assumptions, and one unproved rank-preservation step in the SDR tightness proof.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Far-field plane wave model; only channel phases change with antenna position, while amplitudes and angles remain invariant.
    Invoked in Section II-A to write field response vectors as phase-only functions of position; standard in MA literature but approximate in near-field or rich scattering scenarios.
  • domain assumption Complete CSI of target, clutters, and users is known at the BS.
    Section II-C states this assumption explicitly; the optimization requires full knowledge of target and clutter channels, which is difficult to obtain in practice.
  • domain assumption MA movement overhead is negligible relative to channel coherence time.
    Section II assumes this to justify treating antenna positions as static during transmission; fast-moving channels could break the validity of the optimized positions.
  • ad hoc to paper Subtracting two random rank-one PSD matrices from a positive definite matrix leaves rank at least N-1.
    Appendix A, Eq. (56); needed to conclude rank(Xk)=1. This claim is not generally true and no proof is given, so the SDR tightness argument is incomplete.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Movable Antenna-Assisted Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IRUDLK7X

@misc{pith2026250101217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Movable Antenna-Assisted Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IRUDLK7X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01217}
}
read the original abstract

Movable antennas (MAs) enhance flexibility in beamforming gain and interference suppression by adjusting position within certain areas of the transceivers. In this paper, we propose an MA-assisted integrated sensing and communication framework, wherein MAs are deployed for reconfiguring the channel array responses at both the receiver and transmitter of a base station. Then, we develop an optimization framework aimed at maximizing the sensing signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) by jointly optimizing the receive beamforming vector, the transmit beamforming matrix, and the positions of MAs while meeting the minimum SINR requirement for each user. To address this nonconvex problem involving complex coupled variables, we devise an alternating optimization-based algorithm that incorporates techniques including the Charnes-Cooper transform, second-order Taylor expansion, and successive convex approximation (SCA). Specifically, the closed form of the received vector and the optimal transmit matrix can be first obtained in each iteration. Subsequently, the solutions for the positions of the transmit and receive MAs are obtained using the SCA method based on the second-order Taylor expansion. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme has significant advantages over the other baseline schemes. In particular, the proposed scheme has the ability to match the performance of the fixed position antenna scheme while utilizing fewer resources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01217 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The system model illustrates an MA-assisted ISAC fra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Convergence performance of the proposed algorithms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sensing SINR versus transmit power Pth. (N = 10, M = 6) Tx and Rx each employ a PA consisting of N and M FPAs, respectively, with antenna spacing of λ 2 . A. Convergence Performance of Proposed Algorithms In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sensing SINR versus the number of Rx antennas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sensing SINR versus the size of the moveable area. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Beampattern of Tx. (N = 10) -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Initial antenna position Optimized antenna position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of channel power gain in Rx area [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Vision of 6G Wireless Sy stems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Pro blems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A Vision of 6G Wireless Sy stems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Pro blems,” IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, May/Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Func tional Wire- less Networks for 6G and Beyond,

    F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, an d S. Buzzi, “Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Func tional Wire- less Networks for 6G and Beyond,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Joint Multi-User Communication and Sensing Exploiting Both Signal and Envir onment Sparsity,

    X. Tong, Z. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Huang, and M. Debbah, “Joint Multi-User Communication and Sensing Exploiting Both Signal and Envir onment Sparsity,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1409– 1422, Nov. 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Bayesian Learning for Double-RIS Aide d ISAC Systems with Superimposed Pilots and Data,

    X. Gan, C. Huang, Z. Y ang, C. Zhong, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, Q. Gu o, C. Y uen, and M. Debbah, “Bayesian Learning for Double-RIS Aide d ISAC Systems with Superimposed Pilots and Data,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., doi: 10.1109/JSTSP .2024.3408071

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Integrating Sensing, Computing, and Communication in 6G W ireless Networks: Design and Optimization,

    Q. Qi, X. Chen, A. Khalili, C. Zhong, Z. Zhang, and D. W. K. N g, “Integrating Sensing, Computing, and Communication in 6G W ireless Networks: Design and Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 6212–6227, Sept. 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Coverage and Rate Analysis for Integrated Se nsing and Communication Networks,

    X. Gan, C. Huang, Z. Y ang, X. Chen, J. He, Z. Zhang, C. Y uen, Y . Guan, and M. Debbah, “Coverage and Rate Analysis for Integrated Se nsing and Communication Networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2213–2227, Sept. 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    CRB Minimization for RIS-Aided mmWave Integrated Sensing and Communications,

    W. Lyu, S. Y ang, Y . Xiu, Y . Li, H. He, C. Y uen, and Z. Zhang “CRB Minimization for RIS-Aided mmWave Integrated Sensing and Communications,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 18381– 18393, May 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Enabling Joint Communication and Radar S ensing in Mobile Networks–A Survey,

    J. Andrew Zhang, M. L. Rahman, K. Wu, X. Huang, Y . J. Guo, S. Chen, and J. Y uan, “Enabling Joint Communication and Radar S ensing in Mobile Networks–A Survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 306–345, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Num- bers of Base Station Antennas,

    T. L. Marzetta, “Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Num- bers of Base Station Antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3590–3600, Nov. 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    Millimet er Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work!,

    T. S. Rappaport, S. Sun, R. Mayzus, H. Zhao, Y . Azar, K. Wa ng, G. N. Wong, J. K. Schulz, M. Samimi, and F. Gutierrez, “Millimet er Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work!,” IEEE Access , vol. 1, pp. 335–349, May 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Power A llocation for Massive MIMO-ISAC Systems,

    B. Liao, H. Q. Ngo, M. Matthaiou, and P . J. Smith, “Power A llocation for Massive MIMO-ISAC Systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14232–14248, Oct. 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Joint Transmit Beamforming for Multiuser MIMO Communicat ions and MIMO Radar,

    X. Liu, T. Huang, N. Shlezinger, Y . Liu, J. Zhou, and Y . C. Eldar, “Joint Transmit Beamforming for Multiuser MIMO Communicat ions and MIMO Radar,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 68, pp. 3929–3944, Jun. 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Su rface for Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Perspectives, C hallenges, and Opportunities,

    B. Li, W. Xie, and Z. Fei, “Reconfigurable Intelligent Su rface for Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Perspectives, C hallenges, and Opportunities,” IEEE Internet Things Mag. , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 36– 42, Jul. 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Se cure Beam- forming Design for RIS-Assisted Integrated Sensing and Com munication Systems,

    C. Jiang, C. Zhang, C. Huang, J. Ge, J. He, and C. Y uen, “Se cure Beam- forming Design for RIS-Assisted Integrated Sensing and Com munication Systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 520–524, Feb. 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Robust Sec ure Design for RIS-Aided NOMA Network Against Internal Near-End Eaves drop- ping,

    C. Jiang, C. Zhang, P . Hao, Z. Zhang and J. Ge, “Robust Sec ure Design for RIS-Aided NOMA Network Against Internal Near-End Eaves drop- ping,” IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 142105–142113, Oct. 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Secure Wireless Communication in Active RIS-Assist ed DFRC Systems,

    Y . Zhang, H. Ren, C. Pan, B. Wang, Z. Y u, R. Weng, T. Wu, and Y . He, “Secure Wireless Communication in Active RIS-Assist ed DFRC Systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Tech., doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3438151

    2024

  9. [17]

    A Hybrid Framework of RIS-assisted Robust Secu re Transmission Design for Multibeam Satellite Communicatio ns,

    C. Jiang, C. Zhang, C. Huang, J. Zhang, X. Zhu, J. Ge, M. De bbah, and C. Y uen, “A Hybrid Framework of RIS-assisted Robust Secu re Transmission Design for Multibeam Satellite Communicatio ns,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Tech., doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3520697

  10. [18]

    Modeling and Performance An alysis for Movable Antenna Enabled Wireless Communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and Performance An alysis for Movable Antenna Enabled Wireless Communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2024. 14 ∂f (rm) ∂xm = − 2π λ |αd|2 N∑ n=1 Lr d∑ j=1 Lr d∑ p=1  |um|2 ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ [ ~Gd,n ] j,p ⏐ ⏐ ⏐...

    2024

  11. [19]

    MIMO Capacity Characteriza tion for Movable Antenna Systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO Capacity Characteriza tion for Movable Antenna Systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Movable Antennas for Wirele ss Communication: Opportunities and Challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable Antennas for Wirele ss Communication: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Secure Wirel ess Communication via Movable-Antenna Array,

    G. Hu, Q. Wu, K. Xu, J. Si, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Secure Wirel ess Communication via Movable-Antenna Array,” IEEE Signal Process Lett. , vol. 31, pp. 516–520, Jan. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    En abling Secure Wireless Communications via Movable Antennas,

    Z. Cheng, N. Li, J. Zhu, X. She, C. Ouyang, and P . Chen, “En abling Secure Wireless Communications via Movable Antennas,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, Seoul, Korea, Apr. 2024, pp. 14–19

    2024

  15. [23]

    Movable Antenna-Enhanced Wireless Communications: Gene ral Archi- tectures and Implementation Methods,

    B. Ning, S. Y ang, Y . Wu, P . Wang, W. Mei, C. Y uen, and E. Bj¨ ornson, “Movable Antenna-Enhanced Wireless Communications: Gene ral Archi- tectures and Implementation Methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15448 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    M ovable Antenna-Enhanced Multiuser Communication: Optimal Discr ete Antenna Positioning and Beamforming,

    Y . Wu, D. Xu, D. W. K. Ng, W. Gerstacker, and R. Schober, “M ovable Antenna-Enhanced Multiuser Communication: Optimal Discr ete Antenna Positioning and Beamforming,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02304 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Movable-A ntenna Position Optimization: A Graph-Based Approach,

    W. Mei, X. Wei, B. Ning, Z. Chen, and R. Zhang, “Movable-A ntenna Position Optimization: A Graph-Based Approach,” IEEE Wireless Com- mun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1853–1857, Jul. 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Movable-Antenna En hanced Multiuser Communication via Antenna Position Optimizatio n,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-Antenna En hanced Multiuser Communication via Antenna Position Optimizatio n,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, Jul. 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Hybrid Beamforming with Sub-ar rayed MIMO Radar: Enabling Joint Sensing and Communication at mmWave B and,

    F. Liu and C. Masouros, “Hybrid Beamforming with Sub-ar rayed MIMO Radar: Enabling Joint Sensing and Communication at mmWave B and,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP , Seoul, Brighton, UK, May 2019, pp. 7770–7774

    2019

  20. [28]

    A Framework for Mutua l Information-Based MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communicat ion Beam- forming Design,

    J. Li, G. Zhou, T. Gong, and N. Liu, “A Framework for Mutua l Information-Based MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communicat ion Beam- forming Design,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Tech., vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 8352–8366, Jun. 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Integrated Sensing and Communi cations With Joint Beam-Squint and Beam-Split for mmWave/THz Massi ve MIMO,

    F. Gao, L. Xu, and S. Ma, “Integrated Sensing and Communi cations With Joint Beam-Squint and Beam-Split for mmWave/THz Massi ve MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2963–2976, May 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Multi-Target Integrated Sensing and Communications in Massive MIMO Syst ems,

    O. A. Topal, ¨O. T. Demir, E. Bj¨ ornson, and C. Cavdar, “Multi-Target Integrated Sensing and Communications in Massive MIMO Syst ems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3501417

    2024

  23. [31]

    Joint Transmit/Receive Anten na Selection and Beamforming Design for ISAC Systems,

    R. Liu, M. Li, and Q. Liu, “Joint Transmit/Receive Anten na Selection and Beamforming Design for ISAC Systems,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Dec. 2023, pp. 3118–3123

    2023

  24. [32]

    Antenn a Selection for Energy-Efficient Dual-Functional Radar-Communication Sy stems,

    I. V aliulahi, C. Masouros, A. Salem, and F. Liu, “Antenn a Selection for Energy-Efficient Dual-Functional Radar-Communication Sy stems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 741–745, Apr. 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Optimized Design for I RS- Assisted Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems in C lutter Environments,

    C. Liao, F. Wang, and V . K. N. Lau, “Optimized Design for I RS- Assisted Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems in C lutter Environments,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 4721–4734, Aug. 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Exploiting RIS in Secure Beamforming Design for NOMA-Assi sted Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    C. Jiang, C. Zhang, C. Huang, J. Ge, M. Debbah, and C. Y uen , “Exploiting RIS in Secure Beamforming Design for NOMA-Assi sted Integrated Sensing and Communication,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 28123–28136, Sept. 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Secure MIM O communication relying on movable antennas

    J. Tang, C. Pan, Y . Zhang, H. Ren, and K. Wang, “Secure MIM O communication relying on movable antennas.” IEEE Trans. Commun. , doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3465369

    2024

  28. [36]

    Movable Antenna Enabled Int erfer- ence Network: Joint Antenna Position and Beamforming Desig n,

    H. Wang, Q. Wu, and W. Chen, “Movable Antenna Enabled Int erfer- ence Network: Joint Antenna Position and Beamforming Desig n,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13573 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mova ble Antenna-Enabled Co-Frequency Co-Time Full-Duplex Wirele ss Commu- nication,

    J. Ding, Z. Zhou, W. Li, C. Wang, L. Lin, and B. Jiao, “Mova ble Antenna-Enabled Co-Frequency Co-Time Full-Duplex Wirele ss Commu- nication,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2412–2416, Oct. 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Multi-Beam Forming With Mov able- Antenna Array,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Multi-Beam Forming With Mov able- Antenna Array,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 697–701, Mar. 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Movable Antenna Enhanced Wi reless Sensing via Antenna Position Optimization,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Movable Antenna Enhanced Wi reless Sensing via Antenna Position Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16575–16589, Nov. 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Fl exible Beamforming for Movable Antenna-Enabled Integrated Sensi ng and Communication,

    W. Lyu, S. Y ang, Y . Xiu, Z. Zhang, C. Assi, and C. Y uen, “Fl exible Beamforming for Movable Antenna-Enabled Integrated Sensi ng and Communication,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10507 , 2024. 15

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Movable A n- tenna Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication

    W. Lyu, S. Y ang, Z. Zhang, C. Assi, and C. Y uen, “Movable A n- tenna Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19763, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Movable Antenna–Enabled RIS- Aided In- tegrated Sensing and Communication,

    H. Wu, H. Ren, and C. Pan, “Movable Antenna–Enabled RIS- Aided In- tegrated Sensing and Communication,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03228 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Perceptive M obile Network with Distributed Target Monitoring Terminals: Leaking Com munication Energy for Sensing,

    L. Xie, P . Wang, S. Song, and K. B. Letaief, “Perceptive M obile Network with Distributed Target Monitoring Terminals: Leaking Com munication Energy for Sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 10193–10207, Dec. 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Full-Duplex NO MA- Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication: Joint Trans mit and Receive Beamforming Optimization,

    R. Li, L. Wang, K. Chen, L. Xu, and A. Fei, “Full-Duplex NO MA- Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication: Joint Trans mit and Receive Beamforming Optimization,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 27015–27029, Aug. 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Compressed Sensing Based Ch annel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communications,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed Sensing Based Ch annel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, pp. 2747–2751, Oct. 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Channel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communication Sys tems: A Framework Based on Compressed Sensing,

    Z. Xiao, S. Cao, L. Zhu, Y . Liu, B. Ning, X.-G. Xia, and R. Z hang, “Channel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communication Sys tems: A Framework Based on Compressed Sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Sept. 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    MIMO Radar WaveformOptimiza- tion With Prior Information of the Extended Target and Clutt er,

    C. -Y . Chen and P . P . V aidyanathan, “MIMO Radar WaveformOptimiza- tion With Prior Information of the Extended Target and Clutt er,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 3533–3544, Sept. 2009

    2009

  40. [48]

    NOMA-Aided Jo int Communication, Sensing, and Multi-Tier Computing Systems ,

    Z. Wang, X. Mu, Y . Liu, X. Xu, and P . Zhang, “NOMA-Aided Jo int Communication, Sensing, and Multi-Tier Computing Systems ,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 574–588, Mar. 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Majorization-Minim ization Algo- rithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine L earning,

    Y . Sun, P . Babu, and D. P . Palomar, “Majorization-Minim ization Algo- rithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine L earning,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 794–816, Feb. 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Outage Constrained Robust Transmit Optimization for Multiuser MISO Downlinks: Tractable Approximations by Conic Optimiz ation,

    K. -Y . Wang, A. M. -C. So, T. -H. Chang, W. -K. Ma, and C. -Y . Chi, “Outage Constrained Robust Transmit Optimization for Multiuser MISO Downlinks: Tractable Approximations by Conic Optimiz ation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 5690–5705, Nov. 2014

    2014

  43. [51]

    Exploiting NOMA and RIS in Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    J. Zuo, Y . Liu, C. Zhu, Y . Zou, D. Zhang and N. Al-Dhahir, “ Exploiting NOMA and RIS in Integrated Sensing and Communication,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Tech., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 12941–12955, Oct. 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.