Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Precision Measurement of the Newtonian Gravitational Constant Using Cold Atoms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.7954 v1 pith:ITJPL5XT submitted 2014-12-26 physics.atom-ph gr-qc

classification physics.atom-phgr-qc
keywords valueexperimentsgravitationalatomscombinedconstanteffectsexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

About 300 experiments have tried to determine the value of the Newtonian gravitational constant, G, so far, but large discrepancies in the results have made it impossible to know its value precisely. The weakness of the gravitational interaction and the impossibility of shielding the effects of gravity make it very difficult to measure G while keeping systematic effects under control. Most previous experiments performed were based on the torsion pendulum or torsion balance scheme as in the experiment by Cavendish in 1798, and in all cases macroscopic masses were used. Here we report the precise determination of G using laser-cooled atoms and quantum interferometry. We obtain the value G=6.67191(99) x 10^(-11) m^3 kg^(-1) s^(-2) with a relative uncertainty of 150 parts per million (the combined standard uncertainty is given in parentheses). Our value differs by 1.5 combined standard deviations from the current recommended value of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology. A conceptually different experiment such as ours helps to identify the systematic errors that have proved elusive in previous experiments, thus improving the confidence in the value of G. There is no definitive relationship between G and the other fundamental constants, and there is no theoretical prediction for its value, against which to test experimental results. Improving the precision with which we know G has not only a pure metrological interest, but is also important because of the key role that G has in theories of gravitation, cosmology, particle physics and astrophysics and in geophysical models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Massive graviton dark matter searches with long-baseline atom interferometers

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Long-baseline atom interferometers could detect ultra-light spin-2 dark matter through three coupling channels, reaching mass and coupling ranges that LIGO and LISA cannot cover.

  2. Estimating the sensitivity of the IceCube Upgrade to probe the interior of the Earth using atmospheric neutrino oscillations

    hep-ex 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Monte Carlo sensitivity study projects that the IceCube Upgrade with DeepCore can detect Earth matter effects at 5.5-7.1 sigma, reject a uniform Earth at 2.4 sigma, and measure the Earth's mass to about 10% precision.

Pith tools