Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Updated results on neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmology with Planck 2018 likelihoods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.12598 v3 pith:IVOWFMXI submitted 2019-07-29 astro-ph.CO hep-exhep-ph

classification astro-ph.COhep-exhep-ph
keywords textrmboundshierarchylambdamassdatadifferentfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this work we update the bounds on $\sum m_{\nu}$ from latest publicly available cosmological data and likelihoods using Bayesian analysis, while explicitly considering particular neutrino mass hierarchies. In the minimal $\Lambda\textrm{CDM}+\sum m_{\nu}$ model with most recent CMB data from Planck 2018 TT,TE,EE, lowE, and lensing; and BAO data from BOSS DR12, MGS, and 6dFGS, we find that at 95\% C.L. the bounds are: $\sum m_{\nu}<0.12$ eV (degenerate), $\sum m_{\nu}<0.15$ eV (normal), $\sum m_{\nu}<0.17$ eV (inverted). The bounds vary across the different mass orderings due to different priors on $\sum m_{\nu}$. Also, we find that the normal hierarchy is very mildly preferred relative to the inverted, using both minimum $\chi^2$ values and Bayesian Evidence ratios. In this paper we also provide bounds on $\sum m_{\nu}$ considering different hierarchies in various extended cosmological models: $\Lambda\textrm{CDM}+\sum m_{\nu}+r$, $w\textrm{CDM}+\sum m_{\nu}$, $w_0 w_a \textrm{CDM}+\sum m_{\nu}$, $w_0 w_a \textrm{CDM}+\sum m_{\nu}$ with $w(z)\geq -1$, $\Lambda \textrm{CDM} + \sum m_{\nu} + \Omega_k$, and $\Lambda \textrm{CDM} + \sum m_{\nu} + A_{\textrm{Lens}}$. We do not find any strong evidence of normal hierarchy over inverted hierarchy in the extended models either.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 5. Cosmological Constraints with Simulation-Based Priors

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulation-based priors applied to DESI DR1 full-shape data sharpen cosmological constraints (σ8 error halved) and yield Mν<0.090 eV in w0waCDM, but the results depend on HOD modeling assumptions.

  2. Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 4. Percent-Level Cosmological Constraints from Combined Probes and Robust Evidence for the Normal Neutrino Mass Hierarchy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A combined-analysis of DESI galaxy clustering, CMB lensing, BAO, CMB, and supernovae yields percent-level Lambda-CDM parameters, improved dark-energy figure-of-merit, and neutrino-mass bounds that disfavor the inverte...

  3. Cosmological neutrino mass: a frequentist overview in light of DESI

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A frequentist profile-likelihood analysis of DESI, Planck, ACT, and eBOSS Lyman-alpha data yields Σmν < 53 meV (95% C.L.) in flat ΛCDM and a CMB-independent bound of 285 meV.

  4. Cosmological Constraints on Neutrino Masses in Quintessential Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In the α-attractor quintessential-inflation scenario, Planck PR4 + DESI DR2 BAO + Pantheon+ supernova data imply Σmν < 0.067 eV (flat) and <0.116 eV (with curvature).

Pith tools