Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Covariant Cherenkov Radiation and its Friction Force

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a fully covariant four-force for Cherenkov radiation friction that is naturally orthogonal to the particle's four-velocity, preserving the mass-shell condition and reducing to the Frank-Tamm formula in the medium rest

desk verdict Genuinely covariant Frank-Tamm formula plus an orthogonal four-force, cleanly derived; one under-justified momentum-bookkeeping step that is fixable, not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.01636 v3 pith:IYBPBD6K submitted 2026-03-02 hep-ph

Will Price , Martin S. Formanek , Johann Rafelski This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 41.60.Bq03.30.+p41.60.-m
keywords CherenkovradiationFrank-Tammformulafrictioncovariantelectrodynamicsfour-forcerefractiveindexdielectricmediumphotonspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives a fully covariant formula for the radiation friction force a charged particle experiences when emitting Cherenkov radiation in a dielectric. The force is shown to be orthogonal to the particle's four-velocity, so it preserves the on-shell condition p^2 = m^2 c^2, unlike the covariant Larmor force which requires ad-hoc corrections. The result reduces exactly to the traditional Frank-Tamm stopping power in the medium's rest frame, and it provides a covariant photon emission spectrum. The paper also suggests this could explain the excess of soft photons observed in relativistic hadron collisions.

What carries the argument

The key object is the antisymmetric velocity tensor R^{μν}, which generates a force orthogonal to u^μ from the two four-velocities; it is what makes the force naturally mass-preserving. The derivation relies on a covariant constitutive tensor density for the dielectric, a propagator expressed via Hankel functions, and a contour integral whose branch structure produces the Cherenkov threshold. The coefficient r_CRF carries all material dependence through the index of refraction n(ek).

What would settle it

Pass a charged particle through a transparent dielectric flowing with a velocity perpendicular to the particle's motion. According to Eq. (86), the frictional force will have a component perpendicular to the particle's velocity in addition to the usual stopping component. If the measured force is purely along the particle's motion, the covariant four-force claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Cherenkov radiation reaction on a uniformly moving, superluminal charge in a homogeneous, non-absorbing dielectric is F^μ_CRF = r_CRF R^{μν} u_ν, where R^{μν} = (η^μ u^ν - u^μ η^ν)/c^2 is an antisymmetric tensor built from the medium and particle four-velocities. Consequently, F · u = 0 automatically, preserving the particle's mass. The scalar coefficient r_CRF is an integral over invariant wavenumber with the Cherenkov threshold n(ek)V > 1. This is the covariant generalization of the Frank-Tamm formula, which emerges in the medium rest frame.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that the dielectric is transparent (real refractive index) with ordinary dispersion; if the medium absorbs light, the sharp threshold and the orthogonality of the force no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The covariant force provides a consistent radiation reaction for Cherenkov emission, avoiding the runaway solutions that plague Larmor's force.
  • In the medium rest frame, the force reduces to the Frank-Tamm formula, confirming the generalization against known physics.
  • The photon emission spectrum (Eq. (94)) is flat when n is constant, offering a direct observable for soft-photon excess in collisions.
  • The same tensor structure can be used for any force in a medium with a preferred frame, including future combined Larmor-Cherenkov treatments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this covariant structure is generic, any dissipative force in a medium with a four-velocity can be written as an antisymmetric product of that velocity with the particle's velocity, suggesting a unified treatment of friction forces.
  • The paper's neglect of absorption is testable: in a slightly absorbing medium, the threshold should smooth and a parallel force component appear; measuring this would delimit the formula's domain.
  • The flat spectrum in the transparency band could be used to extract n(ek) from measured photon yields, turning Cherenkov emission into a probe of the medium's dielectric function.
  • The connection to soft photon excess in hadron collisions implies that the dielectric properties of the quark-gluon plasma could be inferred from the photon spectrum, a step the paper leaves to future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a Lorentz-covariant treatment of Cherenkov radiation from a uniformly moving charged particle in a homogeneous, isotropic, non-absorbing dielectric. It introduces a medium four-velocity, formulates covariant constitutive relations, derives the propagator and the electromagnetic/displacement fields for the moving charge, computes the momentum flux through a surrounding hypercylinder, and obtains a four-force F_CRF^μ = r_CRF R^{μν} u_ν (Eqs. (86)-(89)) that is orthogonal to the particle four-velocity. The authors show that, in the medium rest frame, the energy loss reduces to the Frank-Tamm formula (Eq. (7)) and also give a photon emission spectrum and an order-of-magnitude estimate for an electron in water.

Significance. If the central result is correct, the paper provides a useful covariant formulation of Cherenkov radiation reaction, a naturally on-shell-preserving four-force, and a possible diagnostic tool for soft-photon excesses in relativistic collisions. The derivation is largely self-contained and detailed: the propagator, the field tensors, and the contour integrations are worked out in appendices, and the reduction to the Frank-Tamm energy loss is a nontrivial consistency check rather than a fitting step. The paper ships no code, but the analytic derivation is sufficiently explicit for an expert to verify. The main physical concern is the momentum bookkeeping between field, particle, and medium, which directly affects the spatial components of the advertised force.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. V, Eqs. (69) and (86)] The central step identifies the force on the particle with minus the change of electromagnetic-field momentum computed from the tensor T^{μν}=F^{μα}H^{*ν}_{α}+(1/4)F_{αβ}H^{*αβ}g^{μν}. This is a Minkowski-type field tensor, not the total stress-energy-momentum tensor of the field plus dielectric. Even in a non-absorbing medium, bound currents can exchange momentum with the field, so the flux of this T^{μν} through a hypercylinder does not by itself give the momentum lost by the free charge unless an additional assumption is made about the medium momentum. The reduction to the Frank-Tamm formula in Eq. (91) tests only the energy component in the medium rest frame; it does not fix the spatial components of Eq. (86). This is load-bearing because the covariant force is the main new result. The authors should either derive F_CRF directly from the Lorentz self-force of the particle using the c
  2. [Sec. II, Eqs. (9)-(10)] The numerical estimate for the Cherenkov acceleration in water uses the 200-800 nm transparency window as an integration range. The result is dominated by the UV cutoff, so the quoted |a_CRF| ≈ 6×10^16 m/s^2 is a model-dependent estimate rather than a prediction of the covariant formula. This is not an objection to the derivation, but the claim should be phrased with an explicit uncertainty or a statement that the value is illustrative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (69)] The use of the complex conjugate H* in the energy-momentum tensor is natural for spectral decomposition, but since the final expressions are integrated over all real ek, a short comment explaining why the real-field energy-momentum tensor is recovered after integration would improve readability.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C11)] The contour argument that the same pole contributes for positive and negative k0 relies on n(-k0)=n(k0) and on the chosen ϵ prescription. The present wording is concise; a sentence explicitly stating the analytic continuation for k0<0 would remove ambiguity.
  3. [Eqs. (7) and (91)] The connection between the invariant wavenumber ek and the angular frequency ω (ek=ω/c in the medium rest frame) is used implicitly in the Frank-Tamm comparison. It would help to state this explicitly near Eq. (91).
  4. [Sec. VI] The speculative application to soft-photon excesses in hadron collisions is interesting but not quantitatively connected to the model here. If retained, it should be clearly separated from the derivation, perhaps with a caveat that no QGP dielectric parameters are provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (86) is derived from field equations and a direct field-momentum integration; Frank-Tamm is recovered as a consistency check, not used as an input.

full rationale

The central result F^μ_CRF = (q^2 μ0 c / 4π V Γ)(η^μ − Γu^μ) ∫ d ek ek [1 − 1/(n^2 V^2)] Θ(nV−1) (Eq. 86) is obtained by solving the covariant constitutive Maxwell equations for the potential (Eqs. 40–59), computing F^μν and H^μν (Eqs. 62 and 65), and integrating the electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor over a hypercylinder (Eqs. 66–84). The only identification between particle and field is the standard conservation statement, 'This radiated momentum change is equal and opposite to the momentum lost by the particle' (before Eq. 86). This is not a fitting step and does not import Eq. (86) as an input; it is an application of energy-momentum conservation, with the medium treated as a non-dynamical background. The Frank-Tamm formula (Eq. 7) is compared only after the derivation, in Eq. (91), as a rest-frame consistency check. No parameter is fitted: the only material input is the refractive index n(ek) with stated assumptions Im n = 0, n > 0, dn/d ek > 0. Citations to the authors' prior work [6,7] on covariant material friction are analogical; the antisymmetric tensor structure R^μν follows independently from η^μ − Γu^μ = R^μν u_ν, and the derivation does not rely on those references. Other self-citations [18,30,34] concern peripheral technical points. The main physical caveats—neglect of medium mechanical momentum and of absorptive losses—are explicitly stated limitations, not circular reductions; they could affect correctness but do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. The medium four-velocity eta^mu is a standard description, not an invented object. The only hand-chosen numbers are in the illustrative water estimate. The physical assumptions are the standard idealizations for the problem: non-magnetic, non-absorbing isotropic dielectric, uniform particle motion, and the chosen form of the medium energy-momentum tensor.

free parameters (2)
  • water transparency integration window = omega_min=2.4e15 Hz, omega_max=9.4e15 Hz
    Used only in the illustrative numerical estimate for an electron in water (Eq. 10), not in the central derivation. The full Frank-Tamm integral diverges; the window sets the illustrative J and |a_CRF|.
  • water refractive index n = 1.33
    Approximate constant over the water transparency band, used in the numerical estimate in Section II. Not needed for the covariant derivation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Maxwell equations with covariant constitutive relations for a linear, isotropic, homogeneous medium.
    The core equations, Eqs. (40)-(42), are taken as the starting point.
  • domain assumption The medium has no magnetic or magneto-electric properties; permeability is the vacuum permeability mu0.
    Assumed in Section III, Eqs. (37)-(39). This simplifies the constitutive tensor and is needed for the propagator form.
  • domain assumption Index of refraction is real, positive, and has regular dispersion dn(ek)/dek>0.
    States 'Im[n(ek)]=0' and 'dn(ek)/dek>0' after Eq. (48). This is load-bearing for the sharp Cherenkov threshold and the contour integral.
  • domain assumption The particle trajectory is exactly uniform, z^mu(tau)=u^mu tau, with no back-reaction on the trajectory at leading order.
    Used in Eq. (58) and throughout; the paper states it considers the leading order only.
  • domain assumption The field energy-momentum tensor in the medium is T^(mu nu)=F^(mu alpha)H*_(nu alpha)+(1/4)F^(alpha beta)H*_(alpha beta)g^(mu nu).
    Introduced in Eq. (69) without discussion of the Abraham-Minkowski ambiguity for dispersive media; this underlies the force extraction.
  • domain assumption The refractive index n(k0) is an even function and analytic in the upper half plane for the contour integration.
    Needed in Appendix C to select the retarded pole and to evaluate the propagator integral.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Covariant Cherenkov Radiation and its Friction Force." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IYBPBD6K

@misc{pith2026260301636,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Covariant Cherenkov Radiation and its Friction Force},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IYBPBD6K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.01636}
}
read the original abstract

We derive the covariant generalization of the Frank-Tamm formula describing the Cherenkov radiation by a charged particle moving uniformly with a speed faster than the local speed of light within a homogeneous dielectric medium. We use our result to derive the covariant Cherenkov radiation reaction force and obtain a four-force explicitly orthogonal to particle four-velocity consistent with a relativistic friction force. We present the photon emission spectrum that is dependent primarily on the dielectric properties of the medium. We hint at a possible use of this work to interpret an excess of soft photons seen in relativistic hadron collisions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.01636 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic 2D representation of the 4D problem. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    (D12) can then be simplified to − iekx⊥ Vcoshy 1 (coshy 1 sinhφ−sinhy 1 coshφ) =−i ekx⊥ √ 1−n 2V 2 V sinh (φ−y 1)

    CasenV<1 In this case, the rapidity-like variabley 1 can be intro- duced such that coshy 1 = 1√ 1−n 2V 2 ,(D13) tanhy 1 =nV.(D14) The argument of the exponential in the integrand of Eq. (D12) can then be simplified to − iekx⊥ Vcoshy 1 (coshy 1 sinhφ−sinhy 1 coshφ) =−i ekx⊥ √ 1−n 2V 2 V sinh (φ−y 1). (D15) Let us define a quantity σ1 ≡ |ek|x⊥ V p 1−n 2V 2 ...

  2. [2]

    (D12), the rapidity-like variabley 2 can be defined in this regime as tanhy 2 = 1 nV ,(D23) sinhy 2 = 1√ n2V 2 −1 ,(D24) so that the square root remains real

    CasenV>1 Starting from Eq. (D12), the rapidity-like variabley 2 can be defined in this regime as tanhy 2 = 1 nV ,(D23) sinhy 2 = 1√ n2V 2 −1 ,(D24) so that the square root remains real. The argument of the exponential in the integrand of Eq. (D12) can be sim- plified as − iekx⊥ Vsinhy 2 (sinhy 2 sinhφ−coshy 2 coshφ) = iekx⊥ V p n2V 2 −1 cosh(φ−y 2). (D25)...

  3. [3]

    (D22)] andI 2 [Eq

    Overall solution for arbitrarynV We can express the two regimesI 1 [Eq. (D22)] andI 2 [Eq. (D31)] of the integralI( ek, x⊥) defined in Eq. (D12) as a single combination of Hankel functions I(ek, x⊥) = Θ(1−nV)H (1) 0 (ξ) + Θ(nV −1) × h Θ(ek)H (1) 0 (ξ)−Θ(− ek)H (2) 0 (ξ) i , (D32) where the argument of the Hankel functionsξwas defined as ξ≡σ 2 =iσ 1 = |ek|...

  4. [4]

    H. M. Fried and B. Muller,Vacuum structure in in- tense fields, Vol. 255 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    J. Larmor, On the theory of the magnetic influence on spectra; and on the radiation from moving ions, The Lon- don, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science44, 503 (1897)

  6. [6]

    I. M. Frank and I. E. Tamm, Coherent visible radiation of fast electrons passing through matter, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. URSS14, 109 (1937)

    1937

  7. [7]

    I. E. Tamm, inSelected Papers I.E Tamm: Part I: Elec- trodynamics, edited by B. M. Bolotovsky and V. Y. Frenkel (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991)

    1991

  8. [8]

    Melrose,Quantum Plasmadynamics: Unmagnetized Plasmas(Springer, (2008))

    D. Melrose,Quantum Plasmadynamics: Unmagnetized Plasmas(Springer, (2008))

    2008

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Dunkel and P

    J. Dunkel and P. H¨ anggi, Relativistic Brownian motion, Physics Reports471, 1 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Formanek, A

    M. Formanek, A. Steinmetz, and J. Rafelski, Radiation reaction friction: Resistive material medium, Phys. Rev. D102, 056015 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    A. O. Barut,Electrodynamics and classical theory of fields & particles(Dover, New York, N.Y., 1980)

    1980

  4. [12]

    G. A. Schott,Electromagnetic Radiation and the Mechan- ical Reactions Arising From It(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1912)

    1912

  5. [13]

    H. A. Lorentz,The theory of electrons(Dover Publica- tions, New York, N.Y., 1952)

    1952

  6. [14]

    Poisson,An introduction to the Lorentz-Dirac equation (arXiv gr-qc/9912045, 1999)

    E. Poisson,An introduction to the Lorentz-Dirac equation (arXiv gr-qc/9912045, 1999)

    1999 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Spohn,Dynamics of charged particles and their radia- tion field(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004)

    H. Spohn,Dynamics of charged particles and their radia- tion field(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Rohrlich,Classical Charged Particles(World Scien- tific, Singapore, 2007)

    F. Rohrlich,Classical Charged Particles(World Scien- tific, Singapore, 2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    Caldirola, A new model of classical electron, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)3, 297 (1956)

    P. Caldirola, A new model of classical electron, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)3, 297 (1956)

    1955

  10. [18]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. Volume 2 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975)

    1975

  11. [19]

    G. W. Ford and R. F. O’Connell, Relativistic form of radiation reaction, Phys. Lett. A.174, 182 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    S. E. Gralla, A. I. Harte, and R. M. Wald, Rigorous derivation of electromagnetic self-force, Phys. Rev. D80, 024031 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Price, M

    W. Price, M. Formanek, and J. Rafelski, Radiation reac- tion and limiting acceleration, Phys. Rev. D105, 016024 (2022), 2112.04444

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Di Piazza, C

    A. Di Piazza, C. Muller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1177 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    D. A. Burton and A. Noble, Aspects of electromagnetic radiation reaction in strong fields, Contemp. Phys.55, 110 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    T. G. Blackburn, Radiation reaction in electron-beam in- teractions with high-intensity lasers, Plasma Phys.4, 5 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045001 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Phys. Rept.1010, 1 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Durrer, The cosmic microwave background: the his- tory of its experimental investigation and its significance for cosmology, Class

    R. Durrer, The cosmic microwave background: the his- tory of its experimental investigation and its significance for cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 124007 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    G. F. Ellis, R. Maartens, and M. A. H. MacCallum,Rel- ativistic cosmology(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    G. M. Hale and M. R. Querry, Optical Constants of Wa- ter in the 200-nm to 200-µm Wavelength Region, Applied optics12, 555 (1973)

    1973

  22. [30]

    M. H. Lynch, E. Cohen, Y. Hadad, and I. Kaminer, Accelerated-Cherenkov radiation and signatures of radi- ation reaction, New J. Phys.21, 083038 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    T. H. O’Dell, The electrodynamics of magneto-electric media, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of The- oretical Experimental and Applied Physics7(82), 1653 (1962)

    1962

  24. [32]

    E. J. Post,Formal Structure of Electromagnetics(Dover Publications, 1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    Price,Covariant Theory of Electromagnetism and Ra- diation in Vacuum and Media, Ph.D

    W. Price,Covariant Theory of Electromagnetism and Ra- diation in Vacuum and Media, Ph.D. thesis, The Univer- sity of Arizona (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Schuster and M

    S. Schuster and M. Visser, Effective metrics and a fully covariant description of constitutive tensors in electrody- namics, Phys. Rev. D96, 124019 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Bel, Radiation States and the Problem of Energy in General Relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation 32, 2047 (2000)

    L. Bel, Radiation States and the Problem of Energy in General Relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation 32, 2047 (2000)

  28. [36]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics(Wiley, 1998)

    1998

  29. [37]

    Formanek, C

    M. Formanek, C. Grayson, J. Rafelski, and B. M¨ uller, Current-conserving relativistic linear response for col- lisional plasmas, Annals Phys.434, 168605 (2021), 2105.07897

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. S. Schwinger, W.-Y. Tsai, and T. Erber, Classical and Quantum Theory of Synergic Synchrotron - ˇCerenkov Radiation, Annals Phys.96, 303 (1976)

    1976

  31. [39]

    Rafelski,Relativity Matters

    J. Rafelski,Relativity Matters. From Einstein ’s EMC2 to Laser Particle Acceleration and Quark-Gluon Plasma 17 (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Schild, On the Radiation Emitted by an Accelerated Point Charge, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Ap- plications1, 127 (1960)

    A. Schild, On the Radiation Emitted by an Accelerated Point Charge, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Ap- plications1, 127 (1960)

    1960

  33. [41]

    F. C. Jones, Lorentz-Invariant Formulation of Cherenkov Radiation by Tachyons, Phys. Rev. D6, 2727 (1972)

    1972

  34. [42]

    V. F. Perepelitsa, Lienard-Wiechert potentials for charged tachyons and several remarks on the tachyon Cherenkov radiation, arXiv (2015), arXiv:1502.06551 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Lehnert and R

    R. Lehnert and R. Potting, Vacuum ˇCerenkov Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 110402 (2004)

    2004

  36. [44]

    Belogianni, W

    A. Belogianni, W. Beusch, T. Brodbeck, F. Dzheparov, B. French, P. Ganoti, J. Kinson, A. Kirk, V. Lenti, I. Mi- nashvili,et al., Observation of a soft photon signal in ex- cess of QED expectations inppinteractions, Phys. Lett. B548, 129 (2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    A. J. Macleod, A. Noble, and D. A. Jaroszynski, Cherenkov Radiation from the Quantum Vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 161601 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Schwinger, L

    J. Schwinger, L. L. DeRaad, Jr, K. A. Milton, and W.-Y. Tsai,Classical Electrodynamics(Perseus Books, 1998)

    1998

  39. [47]

    Abramhowitz and A

    M. Abramhowitz and A. Stegun,Pocketbook of Math- emmatical Functions: Abridged edition of Handbook of Mathematical Functions(Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frank- furt, 1984)

    1984

  40. [48]

    G. N. Afanasiev, S. M. Eliseev, and Y. P. Stepanovsky, Transition of the light velocity in the Valiov–Cerenkov effect, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A454, 1049 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.