Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Inflationary predictions of double-well, Coleman-Weinberg, and hilltop potentials with non-minimal coupling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.04160 v2 pith:IZUT6M5E submitted 2018-02-12 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

classification astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords inflationpredictionsinflatonpotentialscoleman-weinbergcouplingdouble-wellfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We discuss how the non-minimal coupling $\xi\phi^2R$ between the inflaton and the Ricci scalar affects the predictions of single field inflation models where the inflaton has a non-zero vacuum expectation value (VEV) $v$ after inflation. We show that, for inflaton values both above the VEV and below the VEV during inflation, under certain conditions the inflationary predictions become approximately the same as the predictions of the Starobinsky model. We then analyze inflation with double-well and Coleman-Weinberg potentials in detail, displaying the regions in the $v$-$\xi$ plane for which the spectral index $n_s$ and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ values are compatible with the current observations. $r$ is always larger than 0.002 in these regions. Finally, we consider the effect of $\xi$ on small field inflation (hilltop) potentials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quadratic, Higgs and hilltop potentials in the Palatini gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In Palatini gravity, quadratic inflation matches CMB data only for small nonminimal coupling and efficient reheating, while hilltop potentials match only below the vacuum expectation value with tiny coupling.

Pith tools