Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Metric reconstruction and the Hamiltonian for eccentric, precessing binaries in the small-mass-ratio limit

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper computes first-order metric perturbations in four gauges and the generalized redshift invariant for eccentric, precessing orbits about a Kerr black hole, tying the redshift to the conservative Hamiltonian.

desk verdict Solid methodological advance with a real but addressable verification gap around the precessing-orbit regularization parameter. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07746 v2 pith:J3XKW4P5 submitted 2025-07-10 gr-qc

Zachary Nasipak This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.25.Nx04.30.-w04.70.Bw
keywords gravitationalself-forcemetricreconstructionredshiftinvariantKerrblackholeseccentricorbitsprecessingTeukolskyequationHamiltonianformulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a practical route from the Teukolsky equation to the conservative dynamics of a small body on an eccentric, precessing bound orbit around a Kerr black hole. It reconstructs the first-order metric perturbation from the Weyl scalars $\psi_0$ and $\psi_4$ in four gauges, and extracts the generalized redshift invariant, an averaged scalar that determines the first-order interaction Hamiltonian in action-angle variables. This is the first calculation of that invariant for precessing orbits, and the paper argues it supplies the conservative input needed for waveforms accurate to first post-adiabatic order. The numerical machinery is released as an open-source Python package and is demonstrated for spins up to 0.999, eccentricities up to 0.6, and inclination angles up to $49\pi/100$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reconstructed metric perturbation $h_{\alpha\beta}$ built from Hertz potentials tied to the Teukolsky scalars $\psi_0$ and $\psi_4$. Four reconstructions are used: two standard radiation-gauge procedures giving ingoing and outgoing radiation gauge, and two newer symmetric and antisymmetric procedures; the Hertz amplitudes are fixed by Teukolsky\textendash{}Starobinsky identities, and no-string solutions are completed by mass and angular-momentum perturbation terms. The redshift extraction uses mode-sum regularization, applying the leading-order Lorenz-gauge parameter $H^{[0]}_{\mathrm{Lor}}$ to the radiation-gauge and symmetric-radiation-gauge mode sums, with the scalar-field version of that parameter used for precessing orbits. The final link is the Hamiltonian identity $\langle H^{(1)}\rangle_t = m_2\langle \tilde{z}_1\rangle_t$, which converts one averaged scalar on each orbit into the conservative phase-space dynamics.

What would settle it

Compute the same averaged redshift correction for one eccentric, precessing orbit directly in Lorenz gauge (or with a local Green-function puncture method) and compare with the ingoing, outgoing, and symmetric radiation gauge values; any disagreement beyond the stated numerical errors would falsify the key regularization assumption. A cheaper check is to extract the next regularization parameter from the radiation-gauge mode sum and verify that including it does not shift the fitted redshift.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the first-order metric perturbation sourced by a point mass on an eccentric, precessing Kerr geodesic can be reconstructed from the maximal spin-weight Weyl scalars $\psi_0$ and $\psi_4$ through four distinct Hertz-potential procedures, and that from these perturbations the generalized redshift correction $\langle \tilde{z}_1\rangle_t = -\frac{1}{2}\langle \tilde{z}_0 h^R_{uu}\rangle_t$ can be regularized and evaluated. The paper reports agreement between the values obtained from ingoing radiation gauge, outgoing radiation gauge, and symmetric radiation gauge perturbations, and with published values for eccentric equatorial orbits. It extends the same calculation to precessing orbits for the first time, finds that the redshift correction, and hence the interaction Hamiltonian, can be negative near the innermost stable orbit of a nearly extremal Kerr black hole, and connects the tabulated redshift to a six-dimensional Hamiltonian whose Hamilton equations drive the conservative dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The redshift calculation relies on the assumption that the singular part of the metric perturbation near the small body is the same in the radiation gauges as in the standard Lorenz gauge, so the Lorenz-gauge subtraction can be applied to those modes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, all conservative first-order self-force information for an eccentric, precessing orbit is encoded in a single scalar, the averaged redshift correction, rather than in four force components.
  • A first post-adiabatic waveform can be generated by tabulating this scalar over phase space and evolving the orbit with Hamilton's equations.
  • The agreement among ingoing, outgoing, and symmetric radiation gauge results validates the regularization procedure for precessing orbits.
  • The redshift correction and hence the interaction Hamiltonian become negative near the innermost stable orbit for near-extremal spin, so the conservative dynamics has a sign-changing surface there.
  • The method extends to previously inaccessible parameters: spin up to 0.999, eccentricity up to 0.6, and inclination up to $49\pi/100$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next check is to compute the same averaged redshift in Lorenz gauge for one eccentric, precessing orbit, which would independently test whether the Lorenz-gauge regularization parameter is valid in the radiation gauges.
  • The sign-changing redshift surface seen near extremal spin suggests the conservative interaction Hamiltonian vanishes on a locus in parameter space, a feature that could be mapped and compared with effective-one-body and post-Newtonian predictions.
  • With dense tabulation of the redshift across action space, the Hamiltonian formulation could be used to extract precession-dependent post-Newtonian terms, which current redshift expansions lack.
  • Although the antisymmetric radiation gauge is highly singular and likely unsuitable for self-force extraction, it may still serve as an intermediate step toward Lorenz-gauge reconstructions on these orbits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops frequency-domain metric reconstruction for a point-particle source on eccentric, precessing bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime. It implements four reconstruction schemes: the two CCK-based procedures giving outgoing and ingoing radiation gauges, and the two AAB-based procedures giving what the author calls symmetric and antisymmetric radiation gauges. It compares their horizon/infinity asymptotics and their singular structure near the worldline, then extracts the generalized redshift invariant via mode-sum regularization. The redshift results are validated against published eccentric equatorial results for several cases, and new values are presented for inclined orbits, including near-extremal spins and high eccentricities. The results are connected to the Lewis et al. post-adiabatic Hamiltonian framework, and the numerical tools are released in the open-source package pybhpt.

Significance. If the new redshift values are correct, the paper fills a genuine gap: it provides first-order metric perturbations in several gauges and the first conservative quasi-invariant for eccentric, precessing small-mass-ratio systems, with the code openly available. The strengths include systematic cross-gauge comparisons, explicit asymptotic checks, a carefully described regularization fitting procedure with error estimates, and validation against published eccentric equatorial results. The main caveat is that the precessing-orbit regularization rests on an unpublished scalar-field substitution for the gravitational leading-order regularization parameter; until that point is independently supported, the headline numerical results are not fully established. The paper would be a substantial contribution after that load-bearing issue is resolved.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV A and Appendix G] The leading-order regularization parameter used for all precessing-orbit redshift results is the scalar-field H[0] of Ref. [46], imported through a private communication from Heffernan. The manuscript explicitly notes that H[0]_Lor 'has not been explicitly generalized to precessing orbits,' and Appendix G labels the scalar expression as the Lorenz-gauge gravitational H[0] for h_uu without providing a derivation or independent check. This is load-bearing: the three-gauge agreement in Eq. (92) uses the same H[0] in ORG, IRG, and SRG, so it tests internal consistency but not the correctness of the subtracted singular term. If the scalar-field parameter differs from the true gravitational leading-order singular structure for inclined orbits, the mode sums retain an ℓ^0 tail and every new entry in Table II, together with the associated first-order Hamiltonian, would be systematically biased. I recommend either providing a published derivation or generalization of H[0]_Lor for precessing orbits, or benchmarking at least one eccentric precessing case against an independent Lorenz-gauge or time-domain redshift calculation.
  2. [Sec. VI A and Table I] One of the eight validation cases, (â,p,e,x)=(−0.9,p_ISO+1,0.4,1), disagrees with Ref. [17] by 5.8×10^{-6} while the reported fitting uncertainty is only about 1×10^{-6}. The paper attributes this to high-frequency integration error in the Teukolsky solver. Because the same fitting procedure and convergence criterion in Eq. (91) are used for the new precessing results in Table II, the quoted error bars for high-eccentricity, high-spin cases may be underestimated by a similar factor. The authors should either improve the mode-sum or integration accuracy for these cases, inflate the quoted uncertainties accordingly, or provide an independent cross-check for at least one precessing source.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. V A and figures] The text specifies the circular source parameters as (â,p,e,x)=(0.9,10,0,1), while Figures 1 and 2 and Section V B use p=8; the value used in the figures should be made consistent with the text.
  2. [Eq. (54c)] The second assignment in Eq. (54c) repeats Φ^{A,J}_{-2}; it should presumably read Φ^{A,J}_{+2}=Φ^A_0, matching the pattern of Eqs. (54a) and (54b).
  3. [Sec. VI A and Table I] The text says the comparison cases are 'p=p_ISO+1 in [17]', but Table I lists p_ISO+0.1; the table header and the subsequent discussion of (â,p,e,x)=(−0.9,p_ISO+1,0.4,1) should be reconciled.
  4. [Appendix G, Eq. (G1)] The typesetting of H[0] as '4/π r η k K(k)' is unclear; if the intended expression is 4/π √(η/k) K(k), the square root should be displayed explicitly.
  5. [References] Reference [29] is cited as (2025) without an arXiv identifier or journal information; please update the citation before publication.
  6. [Acknowledgments] The acknowledgments refer to 'The authors', although the manuscript is single-authored; this should be adjusted for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the redshift is computed from independently reconstructed metric perturbations; the precessing-orbit H[0] assumption is an external input and a limitation, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper's central claim—the first calculation of the generalized redshift invariant along eccentric, precessing Kerr orbits—is not equivalent to any input by construction. The redshift is obtained from reconstructed metric perturbations via Eqs. (3), (70), and (71), with the reconstructed h_uu computed from Teukolsky and Hertz-potential data, not fitted to the redshift values. The only notable assumption is the generalization of the Lorenz-gauge regularization parameter H[0]_Lor to precessing orbits: Sec. IV A states that H[0]_Lor "has not been explicitly generalized to precessing orbits" and adopts the scalar-field parameter of Ref. [46] on the basis of a private communication from Heffernan. This is a genuine external assumption and a limitation: the precessing results in Table II are conditional on it, and the ORG/IRG/SRG mutual agreement in Sec. VI B is an internal consistency check since all three gauges use the same H[0] and the same least-squares fitting procedure. The paper presents it as such rather than as an independent benchmark. Non-precessing results are validated against the independent Table V of Ref. [17], providing an external check on the reconstruction and regularization pipeline. Self-citations (e.g., to pybhpt and to prior spectral-integration code) support numerical methods and are not load-bearing for the physical claim. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's prior work, and no known result is merely renamed as a new prediction. The flagged regularization issue is a verification/correctness risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are regularization/fitting parameters, not physical constants. The key assumptions are standard self-force framework assumptions plus the applicability of Lorenz gauge regularization parameters to radiation gauges.

free parameters (2)
  • regularization parameters H[k] = H[0] from Lorenz gauge; higher-order H[2n] fit to mode data
    The leading-order H[0] is taken from literature, but higher-order regularization parameters are fitted to the ℓ-mode data of the reconstructed field using a least-squares fitting procedure (Sec. IV A). These fitted parameters affect the final redshift value and its error estimate.
  • fitted extrapolation values <z_rec_1>_t = Varies per source
    The redshift is obtained by fitting the partial sums of regularized modes to a model with unknown H[2n] parameters and the final redshift value. This is a fitting procedure, though the result is cross-validated against independent data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kerr background and geodesic motion at zeroth order
    The whole self-force framework assumes the background is Kerr and the small body follows a geodesic at leading order.
  • domain assumption Point-particle source with distributional stress-energy
    The small body is modeled as a point particle, which is standard in self-force theory but an idealization.
  • domain assumption H[0]_Lor can be used for no-string radiation gauge and SRG perturbations
    This is stated as following from Refs. [17,58] and for precessing orbits from a private communication with Heffernan. It is a critical assumption for the regularization. (Sec. IV A)
  • domain assumption The completion pieces hcomp±_αβ are sufficient for the redshift extraction
    The paper does not construct the full corrector tensor x_αβ, but argues that only the completion information is needed for the redshift. This is based on earlier works [22,59,60]. (Sec. II E)

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metric reconstruction and the Hamiltonian for eccentric, precessing binaries in the small-mass-ratio limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J3XKW4P5

@misc{pith2026250707746,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metric reconstruction and the Hamiltonian for eccentric, precessing binaries in the small-mass-ratio limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J3XKW4P5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07746}
}
abstract

We calculate the first-order (in the mass-ratio) metric perturbation produced by a small body on an eccentric, precessing bound orbit about a Kerr black hole. We reconstruct the metric perturbation from the maximal spin-weight Weyl scalars, $\psi_0$ and $\psi_4$, using four different methods. The first two follow the work of Chrzanowski, Cohen, Kegeles, and Wald and reconstruct the metric perturbation from either $\psi_0$ or $\psi_4$, leading to perturbations in the ingoing or outgoing radiation gauges. The other two methods build upon the work of Aksteiner, Andersson, and B{\"a}ckdahl and reconstruct the metric perturbation from both $\psi_0$ and $\psi_4$. We compare the local and asymptotic behaviors of the metric across different gauges. We also calculate the generalized redshift invariant along eccentric, precessing orbits in Kerr spacetime for the first time and make the numerical methods employed in these calculations openly available through the Python library \texttt{pybhpt}. Building off recent work by Lewis \emph{et al.}, we also relate our redshift data to the Hamiltonian of the system. Combining our numerical data with this Hamiltonian formulation provides a method for generating waveforms that include post-adiabatic conservative effects and acts as a useful bridge between results in self-force, effective-one-body, and post-Newtonian theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07746 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The non-vanishing, tetrad-projected components of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The relative contribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Similar to Fig. 3, we plot the relative contribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Secular evolution of orbital parameters for general bound orbits in Kerr spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Analytic formulas for the orbit-averaged gravitational-wave fluxes of energy, angular momentum, and Carter constant for generic bound Kerr orbits are extended to 6PN order and O(e^16) in eccentricity, with numerical T...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    (8) and frequencies in Eq

    geo Kerr geodesic quantities—such as the orbital func- tions in Eq. (8) and frequencies in Eq. (9)—are accessed through the pybhpt.geo library. Numerical routines are implemented in C + +but are made accessible in Python via Cython. This library makes use of the same code and spectral integration routines described in Appendix B 1 of Ref. [76]

  2. [46]

    van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1711.09607 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [1]

    First, we ensure that our generic regularization parameter, described in Sec

    Validation While we do not have external redshift values to com- pare against, we can validate our calculations through two consistency checks. First, we ensure that our generic regularization parameter, described in Sec. IV A, prop- erly regularizes the leading-order divergence in the ℓ- mode sum of the redshift. In Figure 6, we plot un- regularized and ...

  4. [2]

    However, to the best of our knowledge, current post- Newtonian expansions of the redshift are limited to non- precessing systems, preventing a similar comparison in this work

    Non-eccentric, minimally-precessing orbits Previous investigations of the redshift invariant have verified numerical calculations by both comparing their data to known post-Newtonian results, and they have used numerical data to extract higher-order terms in the post-Newtonian expansion of the redshift [17, 44]. However, to the best of our knowledge, curr...

  5. [3]

    All values were com- puted from ORG perturbations

    Eccentric, precessing orbits In the bottom half of Table II, we present ⟨˜z1⟩t for sev- eral eccentric, precessing sources. All values were com- puted from ORG perturbations. To construct each red- shift estimate, we used up to ℓmax = 30 modes to regular- ize and fit for ⟨˜z1⟩t. Furthermore, each ℓ-mode was calcu- lated using the mode-sum convergence crit...

  6. [4]

    We recommend Refs

    General formalism The Geroch–Held–Penrose (GHP) formalism [86] pro- vides a convenient set of tools for studying spacetimes with two principle null directions. We recommend Refs. [2, 61, 85] for more extensive reviews of GHP no- tation in the context of black hole perturbation theory and its application to the Teukolsky equations and met- ric reconstructi...

  7. [5]

    A 1, the operators T0,4 in Eq

    T eukolsky and reconstruction operators Using the GHP coefficients and operators summarized in App. A 1, the operators T0,4 in Eq. (10) is given by 2T αβ 0 = −(ð − ¯τ ′)2lαlβ − (Þ − ¯ρ)2mαmβ (A7a) + [(Þ − ¯ρ)(ð − 2¯τ ′) + (ð − ¯τ ′)(Þ − 2¯ρ)]lαmβ, 2T αβ 4 = −(ð′ − ¯τ )2nαnβ − (Þ′ − ¯ρ′)2 ¯mα ¯mβ (A7b) + [(Þ′ − ¯ρ′)(ð′ − 2¯τ ) + (ð′ − ¯τ )(Þ′ − 2¯ρ′)]nα ¯m...

  8. [6]

    Kinnersley tetrad and coordinate expressions In this work, we make use of the Kinnersley tetrad. It is given in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates by (lµ) .= 1 ∆ (r2 + a2, ∆, 0, a), (A15a) (nµ) .= 1 2ζ ¯ζ (r2 + a2, −∆, 0, a), (A15b) (mµ) .= 1 ¯ζ r 1 − z2 2 ia, 0, −1, i 1 − z2 , (A15c) and ζ = (r − ia cos θ). The corresponding covectors are (lµ) .= −1, ζ ¯ζ ∆ , 0...

Show all 115 references
  1. [7]

    The ll-components are given by h(0,0,1,0) (+2)ll = − ia √ 1 − z2ζ M 2 , (F1a) h(0,0,2,0) (+2)ll = − ζ 2 2M 2 , (F1b) h(1,0,0,0) (+2)ll = a2 1 − z2 ζ M 2 , (F1c) h(1,0,1,0) (+2)ll = − ia √ 1 − z2ζ 2 M 2 , (F1d) h(2,0,0,0) (+2)ll = a2 1 − z2 ζ 2 2M 2 , (F1e) the lm-components by...

  2. [8]

    The nn-components are given by h(0,0,1,0) (−2)nn = − iaM 2√ 1 − z2 ζ ¯ζ 2 , (F4a) h(0,0,2,0) (−2)nn = − M 2 2¯ζ 2 , (F4b) h(1,0,0,0) (−2)nn = − a2M 2 1 − z2 ζ ¯ζ 2 , (F4c) h(1,0,1,0) (−2)nn = iaM 2√ 1 − z2 ¯ζ 2 , (F4d) h(2,0,0,0) (−2)nn = a2M 2 1 − z2 2¯ζ 2 , (F4e) the n ¯m-co...

  3. [9]

    geo.py: a module for computing bound geodesics and related quantities in Kerr spacetime

  4. [10]

    swsh.py: a module for computing spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics

  5. [11]

    [90] for more on monodromy)

    radial.py: a module for solving homogeneous solu- tions of the radial Teukolsky equation, along with radial monodromy data (see Ref. [90] for more on monodromy)

  6. [12]

    teuk.py: a module for solving inhomogeneous solu- tions to the radial Teukolsky equation with a point- particle source

  7. [13]

    hertz.py: a module for computing the mode func- tions of Hertz potentials

  8. [14]

    metric.py: a module containing coefficients for re- constructing the metric from the Hertz potential(s)

  9. [15]

    redshift.py: a module containing coefficients for re- constructing the redshift invariant from the Hertz potential(s)

  10. [16]

    29 In the following subsections, we summarize the key nu- merical algorithms employed within each package

    flux.py: a module for computing scalar and grav- itational wave fluxes produced by a point-particle source. 29 In the following subsections, we summarize the key nu- merical algorithms employed within each package

  11. [18]

    (39) and (72)

    swsh Spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics are computed with the pybhpt.swsh library using the series expansions in Eqs. (39) and (72). It uses the same numerical routines as described in Appendix B 4 of Ref. [76] to compute the mixing coefficients, but these algorithms are gener...

  12. [19]

    (40) are produced with the pybhpt.radial library

    radial Homogeneous radial Teukolsky solutions to Eq. (40) are produced with the pybhpt.radial library. Again, the library makes use of the same C + +routines as described in Appendix B 5 of Ref. [76], but now generalized to arbitrary s. Rather than directly solving Eq. (40), w...

  13. [20]

    (45), in particular the Teukolsky amplitudes Z J ±2jmω [as de- fined in Eq

    teuk Inhomogeneous radial Teukolsky solutions in Eq. (45), in particular the Teukolsky amplitudes Z J ±2jmω [as de- fined in Eq. (44)], are computed using the pybhpt.teuk library. Using the results in Appendix B, this module ex- tends the spectral source integration algorithm ...

  14. [21]

    Given inhomogeneous Teukolsky so- lutions and a choice of gauge, this library computes the Hertz amplitudes Z J sjmω via Eqs

    hertz We construct Hertz potential mode functions using the pybhpt.hertz library. Given inhomogeneous Teukolsky so- lutions and a choice of gauge, this library computes the Hertz amplitudes Z J sjmω via Eqs. (55) and (56), along with the mode functions RJ sjmω and Ssjmω and th...

  15. [22]

    F are pro- vided in the library pybhpt.metric

    metric The metric coefficients described in App. F are pro- vided in the library pybhpt.metric

  16. [23]

    IV C with those in App

    redshift The redshift coefficients, which are constructed by combining the results in Sec. IV C with those in App. F, are also provided in the library pybhpt.redshift

  17. [24]

    flux While not the focus of this work, one can also calcu- late the contributions of each Teukolsky mode to the en- ergy, angular momentum, and Carter constant “fluxes” via the pybhpt.flux library. Given an inhomogeneous Teukolsky mode produced by the pybhpt.teuk library, the ...

  18. [25]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, Black hole perturbation the- ory and gravitational self-force, in Handbook of Gravi- tational Wave Astronomy, edited by C. Bambi, S. Kat- sanevas, and K. D. Kokkotas (Springer Singapore, Sin- gapore, 2020) pp. 1–119

    2020

  20. [27]

    Berry, S

    C. Berry, S. Hughes, C. Sopuerta, A. Chua, A. Heffer- nan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. Mihaylov, C. Miller, and A. Sesana, The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astronomy, Bull. Am. As- tron. Soc. 51, 42 (2019), arXiv:1903.03686 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Baker, J

    J. Baker, J. Bellovary, P. L. Bender, E. Berti, R. Cald- well, J. Camp, J. W. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, R. DeRosa, M. Eracleous, E. C. Ferrara, S. Francis, M. Hewitson, K. Holley-Bockelmann, A. Hornschemeier, C. Hogan, B. Kamai, B. J. Kelly, J. Shapiro Key, S. L. Larson,...

    2019 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Babak, J

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based inter- ferometer LISA. V. Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Hinderer and E

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Miller and A

    J. Miller and A. Pound, Two-timescale evolution of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: waveform generation scheme for quasicircular orbits in Schwarzschild space- time, Phys. Rev. D103, 064048 (2021), arXiv:2006.11263 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [32]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Transient resonances in the inspirals of point particles into black holes, Physical Review Letters 109, 071102 (2012), arXiv:1009.4923 [gr- qc]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [33]

    van de Meent, Conditions for sustained orbital reso- nances in extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Conditions for sustained orbital reso- nances in extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084033 (2014)

    2014

  27. [34]

    Pound, B

    A. Pound, B. Wardell, N. Warburton, and J. Miller, Second-Order Self-Force Calculation of Gravitational Binding Energy in Compact Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021101 (2020), arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Burke, G

    O. Burke, G. A. Piovano, N. Warburton, P. Lynch, L. Speri, C. Kavanagh, B. Wardell, A. Pound, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Assessing the importance of first postadi- 31 abatic terms for small-mass-ratio binaries, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124048 (2024), arXiv:2310.08927 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    van de Meent and H

    M. van de Meent and H. P. Pfeiffer, Intermediate mass- ratio black hole binaries: Applicability of small mass- ratio perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 181101 (2020), arXiv:2006.12036 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Barack and N

    L. Barack and N. Sago, Gravitational self-force on a par- ticle in eccentric orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084021 (2010), arXiv:1002.2386 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [38]

    A. G. Shah, T. S. Keidl, J. L. Friedman, D.-H. Kim, and L. R. Price, Conservative, gravitational self-force for a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole in a radiation gauge, Phys. Rev. D 83, 064018 (2011), arXiv:1009.4876 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [39]

    A. G. Shah, J. L. Friedman, and T. S. Keidl, Extreme- mass-ratio inspiral corrections to the angular velocity and redshift factor of a mass in circular orbit about a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084059 (2012), arXiv:1207.5595 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Akcay, N

    S. Akcay, N. Warburton, and L. Barack, Frequency- domain algorithm for the Lorenz-gauge gravitational self- force, Phys. Rev. D 88, 104009 (2013), arXiv:1308.5223 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [41]

    van de Meent and A

    M. van de Meent and A. G. Shah, Metric perturba- tions produced by eccentric equatorial orbits around a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064025 (2015), arXiv:1506.04755 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Osburn, N

    T. Osburn, N. Warburton, and C. R. Evans, Highly ec- centric inspirals into a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064024 (2016)

    2016

  36. [43]

    S. R. Dolan, L. Durkan, C. Kavanagh, and B. Wardell, Metric perturbations of Kerr spacetime in Lorenz gauge: Circular equatorial orbits, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2306.16459 (2023), arXiv:2306.16459 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Warburton, T

    N. Warburton, T. Osburn, and C. R. Evans, Evolution of small-mass-ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084057 (2017), arXiv:1708.03720 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Akcay, D

    S. Akcay, D. Dempsey, and S. Dolan, Spin-orbit pre- cession for eccentric black hole binaries at first order in the mass ratio, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 084001 (2017), arXiv:1608.04811v3 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wardell, A

    B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, Gravitational wave- forms for compact binaries from second-order self- force theory, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2112.12265 (2021), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Akcay, S

    S. Akcay, S. R. Dolan, C. Kavanagh, J. Moxon, N. War- burton, and B. Wardell, Dissipation in extreme-mass ra- tio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D102, 064013 (2020), arXiv:1912.09461 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Nasipak, PYBHPT: A python package for solving problems in black hole perturbation theory (2023)

    Z. Nasipak, PYBHPT: A python package for solving problems in black hole perturbation theory (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Nasipak, znasipak/pybhpt: Metric reconstruction and redshift (2025)

    Z. Nasipak, znasipak/pybhpt: Metric reconstruction and redshift (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Le Tiec, First Law of Mechanics for Compact Bina- ries on Eccentric Orbits, Phys

    A. Le Tiec, First Law of Mechanics for Compact Bina- ries on Eccentric Orbits, Phys. Rev. D92, 084021 (2015), arXiv:1506.05648 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Fujita, S

    R. Fujita, S. Isoyama, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, Hamiltonian formulation of the con- servative self-force dynamics in the Kerr geometry, Classical and Quantum Gravity 34, 134001 (2017), arXiv:1612.02504 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Lewis, T

    J. Lewis, T. Kakehi, A. Pound, and T. Tanaka, Post- adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in gravi- tational self-force theory: a pseudo-hamiltonian frame- work, (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    P. L. Chrzanowski, Vector potential and metric pertur- bations of a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2042 (1975)

    1975

  47. [55]

    L. S. Kegeles and J. M. Cohen, Constructive procedure for perturbations of space-times, Phys. Rev. D 19, 1641 (1979)

    1979

  48. [56]

    L. S. Kegeles and J. M. Cohen, Constructive procedure for perturbations of spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 19, 1641 (1979)

    1979

  49. [57]

    R. M. Wald, Construction of solutions of gravitational, electromagnetic, or other perturbation equations from so- lutions of decoupled equations, Physical Review Letters 41, 203 (1978)

    1978

  50. [58]

    Aksteiner, L

    S. Aksteiner, L. Andersson, and T. B¨ ackdahl, New iden- tities for linearized gravity on the Kerr spacetime, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1601.06084 (2016), arXiv:1601.06084 [gr- qc]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole

    S. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. I. Fundamental equations for gravitational, electromag- netic, and neutrino-field perturbations, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973)

    1973

  52. [60]

    Ori, Reconstruction of inhomogeneous metric per- turbations and electromagnetic four-potential in Kerr spacetime, Phys

    A. Ori, Reconstruction of inhomogeneous metric per- turbations and electromagnetic four-potential in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 67, 124010 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0207045

    2003

  53. [61]

    van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on eccentric equatorial orbits around a kerr black hole, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on eccentric equatorial orbits around a kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044034 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Berens, T

    R. Berens, T. Gravely, and A. Lupsasca, Gravitational waves on Kerr black holes: I. Reconstruction of linearized metric perturbations, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 195004 (2024), arXiv:2403.20311 [gr-qc]

    2024

  55. [63]

    Hollands and V

    S. Hollands and V. Toomani, Metric reconstruction in Kerr spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 10.1088/1361-6382/ad87a1 (2024), arXiv:2405.18604 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. R. Dolan, C. Kavanagh, and B. Wardell, Gravitational Perturbations of Rotating Black Holes in Lorenz Gauge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 151101 (2022), arXiv:2108.06344 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Wardell, C

    B. Wardell, C. Kavanagh, and S. R. Dolan, Sourced metric perturbations of Kerr spacetime in Lorenz gauge, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2406.12510 (2024), arXiv:2406.12510 [gr-qc]

    2024

  58. [66]

    Detweiler, A consequence of the gravitational self-force for circular orbits of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys

    S. Detweiler, A consequence of the gravitational self-force for circular orbits of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D 77, 124026 (2008), arXiv:0804.3529 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Barack and N

    L. Barack and N. Sago, Beyond the geodesic approxima- tion: Conservative effects of the gravitational self-force in eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084023 (2011), arXiv:1101.3331 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Akcay, A

    S. Akcay, A. Le Tiec, L. Barack, N. Sago, and N. Warbur- ton, Comparison between self-force and post-Newtonian dynamics: Beyond circular orbits, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124014 (2015), arXiv:1503.01374 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    S. L. Detweiler and B. F. Whiting, Self-force via a Green’s function decomposition, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024025 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0202086. 32

    2003 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Heffernan, Regularization of a scalar charged parti- cle for generic orbits in Kerr spacetime, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2107.14750 (2021), arXiv:2107.14750 [gr-qc]

    A. Heffernan, Regularization of a scalar charged parti- cle for generic orbits in Kerr spacetime, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2107.14750 (2021), arXiv:2107.14750 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    L. C. Stein and N. Warburton, Location of the last sta- ble orbit in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064007 (2020), arXiv:1912.07609 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Fujita and W

    R. Fujita and W. Hikida, Analytical solutions of bound timelike geodesic orbits in Kerr spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 26, 135002 (2009), arXiv:0906.1420 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  65. [73]

    van de Meent, Analytic solutions for parallel transport along generic bound geodesics in kerr spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 145007 (2020)

    M. van de Meent, Analytic solutions for parallel transport along generic bound geodesics in kerr spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 145007 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Dyson and M

    C. Dyson and M. van de Meent, Kerr-fully diving into the abyss: Analytic solutions to plunging geodesics in kerr (2023), arXiv:2302.03704 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Hopper, E

    S. Hopper, E. Forseth, T. Osburn, and C. R. Evans, Fast spectral source integration in black hole pertur- bation calculations, Phys. Rev. D 92, 044048 (2015), arXiv:1506.04742 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Nasipak, T

    Z. Nasipak, T. Osburn, and C. R. Evans, Repeated faint quasinormal bursts in extreme-mass-ratio inspiral wave- forms: Evidence from frequency-domain scalar self-force calculations on generic Kerr orbits, Phys. Rev. D 100, 064008 (2019), arXiv:1905.13237 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Drasco, ´E

    S. Drasco, ´E. ´E. Flanagan, and S. A. Hughes, Computing inspirals in Kerr in the adiabatic regime: I. The scalar case, Classical and Quantum Gravity 22, S801 (2005), gr-qc/0505075

    2005 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Nasipak and C

    Z. Nasipak and C. R. Evans, Resonant self-force effects in extreme-mass-ratio binaries: A scalar model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084011 (2021), arXiv:2105.15188 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, An Approach to Gravita- tional Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients, Jour- nal of Mathematical Physics 3, 566 (1962)

    1962

  72. [80]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, Errata: An Approach to Gravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coeffi- cients, Journal of Mathematical Physics 4, 998 (1963)

    1963

  73. [81]

    R. M. Wald, On perturbations of a Kerr black hole, J. Math. Phys. 14, 1453 (1973)

    1973

  74. [82]

    Pound, C

    A. Pound, C. Merlin, and L. Barack, Gravitational self- force from radiation-gauge metric perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 89, 024009 (2014), arXiv:1310.1513 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Merlin, A

    C. Merlin, A. Ori, L. Barack, A. Pound, and M. van de Meent, Completion of metric reconstruction for a parti- cle orbiting a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104066 (2016), arXiv:1609.01227 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  76. [84]

    van de Meent, The mass and angular momentum of reconstructed metric perturbations, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 34, 124003 (2017), arXiv:1702.00969 [gr-qc]

    M. van de Meent, The mass and angular momentum of reconstructed metric perturbations, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 34, 124003 (2017), arXiv:1702.00969 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  77. [85]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, and P. Zimmerman, Teukolsky formalism for nonlinear Kerr perturbations, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 075001 (2020), arXiv:1908.09095 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Toomani, P

    V. Toomani, P. Zimmerman, A. Spiers, S. Hollands, A. Pound, and S. R. Green, New metric reconstruc- tion scheme for gravitational self-force calculations, Classical and Quantum Gravity 39, 015019 (2022), arXiv:2108.04273 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Bourg, B

    P. Bourg, B. Leather, M. Casals, A. Pound, and B. Wardell, Implementation of a Green-Hollands- Zimmerman-Teukolsky puncture scheme for gravitational self-force calculations, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044007 (2024), arXiv:2403.12634 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Bini and A

    D. Bini and A. Geralico, Gauge-fixing for the completion problem of reconstructed metric perturbations of a Kerr spacetime, (2019), arXiv:1908.03191 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  81. [89]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, New gravitational self-force analytical results for eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole, Physical Review D 93, 104017 (2016), arXiv:1601.02988 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  82. [90]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, High post- Newtonian order gravitational self-force analytical results for eccentric equatorial orbits around a Kerr black hole, Physical Review D 93, 124058 (2016), arXiv:1602.08282 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [91]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Spin-orbit pre- cession along eccentric orbits: improving the knowl- edge of self-force corrections and of their effective-one- body counterparts, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104046 (2018), arXiv:1801.03704 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Bini and A

    D. Bini and A. Geralico, New gravitational self-force an- alytical results for eccentric equatorial orbits around a Kerr black hole: Redshift invariant, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104002 (2019), arXiv:1907.11080 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Le Tiec, L

    A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet, and B. Whiting, The First Law of Binary Black Hole Mechanics in General Relativity and Post-Newtonian Theory, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1111.5378

    2012 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Barack, A

    L. Barack, A. Ori, and N. Sago, Frequency-domain cal- culation of the self-force: The high-frequency problem and its resolution, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084021 (2008), arXiv:0808.2315

    2008 arXiv

  87. [95]

    S. A. Hughes, Evolution of circular, nonequatorial orbits of Kerr black holes due to gravitational-wave emission, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084004 (2000), gr-qc/9910091

    2000 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Ori, Mode sum regularization approach for the self force in black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 61, 061502(R) (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9912010

    2000 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Heffernan, A

    A. Heffernan, A. Ottewill, and B. Wardell, High-order expansions of the Detweiler-Whiting singular field in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 89, 024030 (2014), arXiv:1211.6446 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Ori, Gravitational self-force on a par- ticle orbiting a Kerr black hole, Physical Review Letters 90, 111101 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0212103

    2003 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Heffernan, Self-force regularisation parameters package (2022), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo

    A. Heffernan, Self-force regularisation parameters package (2022), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 6282572

    2022 doi

  92. [100]

    Nasipak, Adiabatic evolution due to the conservative scalar self-force during orbital resonances, Phys

    Z. Nasipak, Adiabatic evolution due to the conservative scalar self-force during orbital resonances, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064042 (2022), arXiv:2207.02224 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Warburton, Self-force on a scalar charge in Kerr space- time: Inclined circular orbits, Phys

    N. Warburton, Self-force on a scalar charge in Kerr space- time: Inclined circular orbits, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024045 (2015), arXiv:1408.2885 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Drasco and S

    S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Rotating black hole orbit functionals in the frequency domain, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044015 (2004)

    2004

  95. [103]

    Park and Z

    S. Park and Z. Nasipak, BlackHolePerturbation- Toolkit/KerrGeoPy (2023)

    2023

  96. [104]

    Park and Z

    S. Park and Z. Nasipak, KerrGeoPy: A Python Package for Computing Timelike Geodesics in Kerr Spacetime, J. Open Source Softw. 9, 6587 (2024), arXiv:2406.01413 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Zengino˘ glu, Hyperboloidal layers for hyperbolic equa- tions on unbounded domains, Journal of Computational Physics 230, 2286 (2011), arXiv:1008.3809 [math.NA]

    A. Zengino˘ glu, Hyperboloidal layers for hyperbolic equa- tions on unbounded domains, Journal of Computational Physics 230, 2286 (2011), arXiv:1008.3809 [math.NA]. 33

    2011 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Panosso Macedo, Hyperboloidal framework for the Kerr spacetime, Class

    R. Panosso Macedo, Hyperboloidal framework for the Kerr spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 065019 (2020), arXiv:1910.13452 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  99. [107]

    R. P. Macedo, B. Leather, N. Warburton, B. Wardell, and A. Zenginoˇ glu, Hyperboloidal method for frequency- domain self-force calculations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104033 (2022), arXiv:2202.01794 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Panosso Macedo, P

    R. Panosso Macedo, P. Bourg, A. Pound, and S. D. Upton, Multidomain spectral method for self- force calculations, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084008 (2024), arXiv:2404.10083 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Spiers, Analytically separating the source of the Teukolsky equation, Phys

    A. Spiers, Analytically separating the source of the Teukolsky equation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104059 (2024), arXiv:2402.00604 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Geroch, A

    R. Geroch, A. Held, and R. Penrose, A space- time calculus based on pairs of null directions, Journal of Mathematical Physics 14, 874 (1973), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1666410

    1973 doi

  103. [111]

    G. F. Torres del Castillo, Gravitational perturba- tions of type-d vacuum space–times with cosmo- logical constant, Journal of Mathematical Physics 35, 3051 (1994), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/35/6/3051/19315593/3051 1 online.pdf

    1994

  104. [112]

    Sasaki and H

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Analytic Black Hole Pertur- bation Approach to Gravitational Radiation, Living Re- views in Relativity 6, 6 (2003), gr-qc/0306120

    2003 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Drasco and S

    S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Gravitational wave snap- shots of generic extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 73, 024027 (2006), gr-qc/0509101

    2006 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Nasipak, Monodromy eigenvalues of the radial Teukol- sky equation and their connection to the renormalized angular momentum, (2024), arXiv:2412.06503 [gr-qc]

    Z. Nasipak, Monodromy eigenvalues of the radial Teukol- sky equation and their connection to the renormalized angular momentum, (2024), arXiv:2412.06503 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Zenginoˇ glu, A geometric framework for black hole perturbations, Phys

    A. Zenginoˇ glu, A geometric framework for black hole perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 83, 127502 (2011), arXiv:1102.2451 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.