Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Directed light emission from monolayers on 2D materials via optical interferences

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The hBN flake thickness determines the angle at which a molecular monolayer reflects and emits light, through Fabry-Pérot interference.

desk verdict A careful angle-resolved study showing hBN thickness flips the emission direction of MePTCDI monolayers; the qualitative effect holds, but per-sample oscillator fitting in the appendix keeps the quantitative claim from being fully predictive. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05865 v1 pith:J5I3W2AQ submitted 2025-05-09 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Pavel Trofimov , Sabrina Juergensen , Adrián Dewambrechies Fernández , Kirill Bolotin , Stephanie Reich , Hélène Seiler This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords angle-resolvedspectroscopybackfocalplaneimaginghexagonalboronnitrideMePTCDImonolayeropticalinterferenceFabry-Pérotcavitytransfermatrixsimulationdirectionalityoflightemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a monolayer of MePTCDI molecules on a hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) flake reflects and emits light in a strongly directional pattern, and that the direction of that pattern is set by the thickness of the hBN flake. Across flakes from 6 to 150 nm, angle-resolved reflectivity and photoluminescence maps change character: some flakes emit brightest straight up, others emit a ring at large angles. Transfer matrix simulations reproduce the angular maps and trace the effect to angle-dependent Fabry-Pérot interference inside the hBN flake and substrate. The authors argue the result is general: any monolayer on a substrate that supports such interference should show the same substrate-controlled directionality.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hBN flake as an angle-dependent Fabry-Pérot cavity. For light arriving at an oblique angle, the optical path through the flake changes, shifting the interference condition; this makes the substrate's reflectivity, and therefore the standing-wave field at the monolayer, strongly angle-dependent. The simulations model the flake and the monolayer as uniaxial dielectric layers with in-plane and out-of-plane permittivities, with the monolayer's resonance described by two Lorentz oscillators; this generic model is what lets the authors extend the conclusion beyond MePTCDI.

What would settle it

Grow the same molecular monolayer on hBN flakes whose thicknesses span at least one full interference period at the exciton energy and record angle-resolved photoluminescence. If the direction of maximum emission does not sweep through the predicted sequence of angles, or if a monolayer transferred off the hBN onto a non-interfering substrate still shows the same directed pattern, the thickness-interference explanation is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the exciton resonance of the molecular monolayer, both the reflectivity dip and the photoluminescence peak are concentrated at specific emission angles that vary with hBN thickness. For 95 nm hBN the photoluminescence maximum sits at k∥/k0 = 0, while for 45 nm hBN it is a minimum there; reflectivity shows the complementary trend for 6 nm and 115 nm flakes. The paper's central explanation is that the hBN flake acts as a Fabry-Pérot etalon whose resonance condition depends on angle; when the cavity is on resonance, substrate reflection drops and absorption in the monolayer is enhanced, so the monolayer emits preferentially at the matching angle. Transfer matrix simulations with a generic Lorentz oscillator model reproduce the measured angular maps, and the authors generalize the conclusion to any 2D material on an interference-supporting substrate.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations fix the monolayer's optical strength once, using data from the thinnest flake, and apply it to every other sample; if that strength actually varies from flake to flake, the exact angle of brightest emission could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Substrate thickness can be used as a design knob: choosing a flake thickness pre-selects the angle at which a monolayer emits, which is relevant for lighting and laser geometries.
  • Experiments that collect light with a limited numerical aperture may miss most or all of the signal at unfavourable hBN thicknesses, so substrate choice must be matched to the measurement geometry.
  • Angle-averaged spectra are not a safe guide to monolayer properties; the same monolayer can appear bright or almost dark depending only on the flake under it.
  • Other 2D materials on hBN or similar substrates should exhibit the same thickness-controlled directionality, since the model only needs their dielectric function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same interference mechanism should imprint angle-dependent patterns on other monolayer signals such as Raman scattering and second-harmonic generation, so thickness scans could be used to isolate those signals from background.
  • Editorial inference: a dynamically tunable emission direction might be achieved by changing the refractive index of the cavity through temperature, gating, or an added tunable layer, a direction the paper leaves unexplored.
  • Editorial inference: because the effect depends only on the dielectric stack, the design principle transfers to encapsulated emitters and multi-layer stacks, making thickness choice a general layout rule for directional outcoupling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies angle-resolved reflectivity and photoluminescence of MePTCDI molecular monolayers on hBN flakes of different thicknesses using back focal plane imaging at 3.5 K. The authors report that the angular distribution of reflectivity and photoluminescence strongly depends on hBN thickness, with the maximum signal occurring at normal incidence for 95 nm hBN and at off-normal angles for 45 nm hBN, and analogous trends for other thicknesses. Transfer matrix simulations reproduce the main qualitative trends and attribute the effect to angle-dependent Fabry-Pérot interference in the hBN substrate. The authors conclude that the substrate thickness controls the direction of light reflection and emission and discuss applications in directional lighting and optoelectronic devices.

Significance. If the quantitative claim holds, the work provides a simple and general mechanism for controlling the emission direction of atomically thin emitters on layered substrates, which is relevant for LEDs, lasers, and angle-resolved spectroscopy. The qualitative observation that the angular distribution flips between on-axis and off-axis maxima with hBN thickness is well supported by the experimental data and by the transfer-matrix interpretation. The paper's strengths are the systematic use of back focal plane imaging, the explicit attempt to separate substrate interference from oscillator-strength effects in the main text, and the open-source transfer-matrix code. The main weakness is that the quantitative thickness-dictated claim is weakened by the per-sample oscillator-strength fitting used in the Appendix, by the unspecified monolayer thickness in the simulations, and by the acknowledged quantitative discrepancies without error analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.C and Appendix Fig. 8] The simulation methodology is internally inconsistent regarding oscillator strength fitting. The main text states that the two Lorentz oscillator strengths L1 and L2 were optimized for the 6 nm hBN sample and then kept constant 'so as to isolate effects from substrate from oscillator strength.' However, the Appendix states that for the additional thickness series (10, 78, 98 nm), 'the oscillator strength in the simulations was optimized to match best the optical response of each sample.' This means the simulations for the extended thickness series are not independent predictions with fixed material parameters, and the agreement shown in Fig. 8 could stem from per-sample flexibility. To support the central quantitative claim that the direction of maximum reflection and emission is dictated by hBN thickness alone, the authors should either re-run all simulations with the single fixed set of oscillator strengths and show the angular maps, or provide a sensitivity analysis showing how much the angle of maximum reflectivity/PL shifts for plausible variations of L1 and L2. Without this, the quantitative angle predictions are underdetermined.
  2. [Section II.C] The monolayer thickness is not stated anywhere in the Methods. Since the transfer-matrix model treats the MePTCDI monolayer as a homogeneous uniaxial dielectric layer, its thickness is a necessary input parameter. If the thickness was taken from a previous work or fitted, this should be stated explicitly, including whether the same value was used for all samples or whether it was varied. As written, the simulated angular maps are not reproducible by an independent group, and the claim that thickness is the only controlling parameter is incomplete without specifying all other geometric inputs.
  3. [Sections III.B, III.C, and Fig. 6(a)] The quantitative comparison between experiment and simulation is acknowledged to be imperfect, with the authors listing normalization issues and oscillator-strength variations as possible causes. However, the abstract and conclusion claim that 'the direction of light reflection and emission is dictated by the hBN flake thickness.' The experimental support for this quantitative directionality rests on two photoluminescence thicknesses (95 and 45 nm) and two reflectivity thicknesses (6 and 115 nm) in the main text, and the additional thicknesses in the Appendix are not compared to fixed-parameter simulations. To test the thickness-dictated prediction explicitly, the authors should plot the experimental angle of maximum reflectivity dip and photoluminescence intensity as a function of hBN thickness, overlaid on the simulated curve from Fig. 6(a), including error bars for the experimental angle determination. This would convert the qualitative visual comparison into a quantitative test of the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says '(d) 20◦ and (d) 110◦'; the first should be '(c) 20◦'.
  2. [Appendix Fig. 8 caption] The sentence 'we note that here that in contrast to the main text' contains a duplicated 'that'; it should read 'we note that here, in contrast to the main text'.
  3. [Section IV] The sentence 'which changes with temperature can be neglected' is grammatically incomplete; it should read 'whose changes with temperature can be neglected.'
  4. [Data Availability Statement] The statement says data 'will be posted in an online repository' but provides no repository name or identifier; please provide a persistent link or state that data are available on request.
  5. [Fig. 5 and related text] The quantitative comparison of reflectivity dip depths (about 5% vs 15%) is given without any uncertainty estimate; adding error bars from repeated measurements or from sample-to-sample variation would strengthen the discussion of quantitative agreement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: angular-directivity claim rests on direct data plus fixed-parameter transfer-matrix predictions; acknowledged oscillator-strength fitting is a limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The central experimental observation that the angular distribution of reflectivity and photoluminescence varies with hBN thickness is direct data (Figs. 2 and 4), and the transfer-matrix model uses an external open-source code with independently measured hBN thicknesses and well-established dielectric constants. The only fitted parameters, the Lorentz oscillator strengths L1 and L2, were 'optimized for best fit for the sample with 6 nm hBN' and then 'kept constant in subsequent simulations, so as to isolate effects from substrate from oscillator strength' (Sec. II.C); the 115 nm reflectivity map and the Fig. 6 thickness sweep are therefore genuine fixed-parameter predictions. The Appendix caption notes that for a separate sample series 'the oscillator strength in the simulations was optimized to match best the optical response of each sample,' and the main text explicitly concedes that 'quantitative differences' could arise from 'oscillator strength variations between different molecular monolayers.' That is an acknowledged fitting limitation, not a hidden reduction of the central claim, because the qualitative thickness-directed behavior is already evident in the experimental data and in the fixed-parameter simulations. Self-citations (Refs. 25 and 26) supply lattice parameters, sample provenance, and collective-state context, but the interference mechanism and the thickness dependence do not reduce to those citations; they are reproduced independently by the transfer-matrix calculation. No equation defines the predicted angular pattern in terms of the measured angular pattern, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Thus the paper exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's interpretation rests on standard transfer matrix theory plus several domain assumptions about the dielectric tensors and effective medium description of the monolayer. The main free parameters are the Lorentz oscillator strengths and the unstated monolayer thickness. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Lorentz oscillator strengths L1 and L2 = not stated in text
    Fitted to best reproduce the reflectivity of the 6 nm hBN sample (Section II.C), then kept constant for other samples.
  • Per-sample oscillator strength (Appendix) = optimized for each sample
    For the appendix samples (Fig. 8), the oscillator strength was optimized to match each sample, making the simulation partly a fit.
  • MePTCDI monolayer thickness = not stated
    The transfer matrix model requires a thickness for the molecular monolayer, but the paper does not give it; presumably taken from prior work, so it is an undisclosed model input.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Transfer matrix formalism accurately describes light propagation in layered anisotropic media.
    The simulations use the open-source PyGTM implementation of the 4x4 transfer matrix method (Section II.C).
  • domain assumption hBN dielectric tensor values (epsilon_x=epsilon_y=4.98, epsilon_z=3.03) are valid in the spectral range studied.
    Taken from literature, not measured in this work (Section II.C).
  • domain assumption The MePTCDI monolayer is a homogeneous uniaxial layer with the given in-plane/out-of-plane dielectric functions and, initially, fixed oscillator strengths.
    Effective medium assumption; the appendix shows the oscillator strength actually varies between samples, so this assumption is imperfect (Section II.C, Appendix).
  • domain assumption The photoluminescence angular pattern is governed by the same substrate interference as the reflectivity.
    The authors infer this from the similarity between PL and reflectivity maps, but do not derive it from a microscopic emission model (Sections III.B and III.C).
  • domain assumption AFM thickness values are accurate and uniform for each hBN flake.
    Thickness is the central control parameter; thickness uncertainty would shift the interference condition (Section II.A).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Directed light emission from monolayers on 2D materials via optical interferences." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J5I3W2AQ

@misc{pith2026250505865,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Directed light emission from monolayers on 2D materials via optical interferences},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J5I3W2AQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05865}
}
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional materials provide a rich platform to explore phenomena such as emerging electronic and excitonic states, strong light-matter coupling and new optoelectronic device concepts. The optical response of monolayers is entangled with the substrate on which they are grown or deposited on, often a two-dimensional material itself. Understanding how the properties of the two-dimensional monolayers can be tuned via the substrate is therefore essential. Here we employ angle-resolved reflectivity and photoluminescence spectroscopy on highly ordered molecular monolayers on hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) to systematically investigate the angle-dependent optical response as a function of the thickness of the hBN flake. We observe that light reflection and emission occur in a strongly directed fashion and that the direction of light reflection and emission is dictated by the hBN flake thickness. Transfer matrix simulations reproduce the experimental data and show that optical interference effects in hBN are at the origin of the angle-dependent optical properties. While our study focuses on molecular monolayers on hBN, our findings are general and relevant for any 2D material placed on top of a substrate. Our findings demonstrate the need to carefully choose substrate parameters for a given experimental geometry but also highlight opportunities in applications such as lighting technology where the direction of light emission can be controlled via substrate thickness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05865 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Illustration of the molecular 2D lattice structure formed by MePTCDI molecules ordered on a hBN substrate. The red halo illus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In panel (a) we report the maximum of the photo- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Angle-resolved photoluminescence spectra from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Polarization dependence of the photoluminescence peak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Angle-resolved s-polarized reflectivity spectra from a mono [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Angular cross-sections of reflectivity spectra taken from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Calculated hBN thickness dependence of the p-polarized re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Angle-resolved photoluminescence spectra for additional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra for additional hBN thick [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author K. S. \ Novoselov , author A. Mishchenko , author A. Carvalho , \ and\ author A. H. \ Castro Neto ,\ title title 2d materials and van der waals heterostructures , \ 10.1126/science.aac9439 journal journal Science \ volume 353 ( year 2016 ),\ 10.1126/science.aac9439 NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.aac9439

  2. [2]

    Gibertini , author M

    author author M. Gibertini , author M. Koperski , author A. F. \ Morpurgo , \ and\ author K. S. \ Novoselov ,\ title title Magnetic 2d materials and heterostructures , \ 10.1038/s41565-019-0438-6 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 14 ,\ pages 408–419 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0438-6

  3. [3]

    Yankowitz , author S

    author author M. Yankowitz , author S. Chen , author H. Polshyn , author Y. Zhang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author D. Graf , author A. F. \ Young , \ and\ author C. R. \ Dean ,\ title title Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene , \ 10.1126/science.aav1910 journal journal Science \ volume 363 ,\ pages 1059–1064 ( year 2019...

    doi:10.1126/science.aav1910

  4. [4]

    Zhang , author Y

    author author H. Zhang , author Y. Wan , author Y. Ma , author W. Wang , author Y. Wang , \ and\ author L. Dai ,\ title title Interference effect on optical signals of monolayer mos2 , \ 10.1063/1.4930257 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 107 ( year 2015 ),\ 10.1063/1.4930257 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4930257

  5. [5]

    Kim , author J

    author author E. Kim , author J. Cho , author B. R. \ Kim , author T. T. T. \ Nguyen , author Y. Nam , author S. Kim , author S. Yoon , author Y. S. \ Kim , author J. Lee , \ and\ author D. Kim ,\ title title Interference‐enhanced broadband absorption of monolayer mos2 on sub‐100 nm thick sio2/si substrates: Reflection and transmission phase changes at in...

    work page doi:10.1002/admi.201701637

  6. [6]

    \ Lien , author J

    author author D.-H. \ Lien , author J. S. \ Kang , author M. Amani , author K. Chen , author M. Tosun , author H.-P. \ Wang , author T. Roy , author M. S. \ Eggleston , author M. C. \ Wu , author M. Dubey , author S.-C. \ Lee , author J.-H. \ He , \ and\ author A. Javey ,\ title title Engineering light outcoupling in 2d materials , \ 10.1021/nl504632u jou...

    work page doi:10.1021/nl504632u

  7. [7]

    \ Li , author H

    author author S.-L. \ Li , author H. Miyazaki , author H. Song , author H. Kuramochi , author S. Nakaharai , \ and\ author K. Tsukagoshi ,\ title title Quantitative raman spectrum and reliable thickness identification for atomic layers on insulating substrates , \ 10.1021/nn3025173 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 6 ,\ pages 7381–7388 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/nn3025173

  8. [8]

    Yoon , author H

    author author D. Yoon , author H. Moon , author Y.-W. \ Son , author J. S. \ Choi , author B. H. \ Park , author Y. H. \ Cha , author Y. D. \ Kim , \ and\ author H. Cheong ,\ title title Interference effect on raman spectrum of graphene , \ 10.1103/physrevb.80.125422 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 80 ( year 2009 ),\ 10.1103/physrevb.80.125422 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.125422

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Buscema , author G

    author author M. Buscema , author G. A. \ Steele , author H. S. J. \ van der Zant , \ and\ author A. Castellanos-Gomez ,\ title title The effect of the substrate on the raman and photoluminescence emission of single-layer mos2 , \ 10.1007/s12274-014-0424-0 journal journal Nano...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Brotons-Gisbert , author J

    author author M. Brotons-Gisbert , author J. P. \ Martínez-Pastor , author G. C. \ Ballesteros , author B. D. \ Gerardot , \ and\ author J. F. \ Sánchez-Royo ,\ title title Engineering light emission of two-dimensional materials in both the weak and strong coupling regimes , \...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Brotons-Gisbert , author R

    author author M. Brotons-Gisbert , author R. Proux , author R. Picard , author D. Andres-Penares , author A. Branny , author A. Molina-Sánchez , author J. F. \ Sánchez-Royo , \ and\ author B. D. \ Gerardot ,\ title title Out-of-plane orientation of luminescent excitons in two-...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Sigl , author M

    author author L. Sigl , author M. Troue , author M. Katzer , author M. Selig , author F. Sigger , author J. Kiemle , author M. Brotons-Gisbert , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author B. D. \ Gerardot , author A. Knorr , author U. Wurstbauer , \ and\ author A. W. \ ...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author R. H. \ Dicke ,\ title title Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes , \ 10.1103/physrev.93.99 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 93 ,\ pages 99–110 ( year 1954 ) NoStop

    1954 doi

  6. [14]

    M\" u ller , author A

    author author M. M\" u ller , author A. Paulheim , author A. Eisfeld , \ and\ author M. Sokolowski ,\ title title Finite size line broadening and superradiance of optical transitions in two dimensional long-range ordered molecular aggregates , \ 10.1063/1.4813521 journal journ...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Doria , author T

    author author S. Doria , author T. S. \ Sinclair , author N. D. \ Klein , author D. I. G. \ Bennett , author C. Chuang , author F. S. \ Freyria , author C. P. \ Steiner , author P. Foggi , author K. A. \ Nelson , author J. Cao , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , author S. Lloyd , autho...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author S. J. \ Masson \ and\ author A. Asenjo-Garcia ,\ title title Universality of dicke superradiance in arrays of quantum emitters , \ 10.1038/s41467-022-29805-4 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 13 ( year 2022 ),\ 10.1038/s41467-022-29805-4 NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    Hertzog , author M

    author author M. Hertzog , author M. Wang , author J. Mony , \ and\ author K. B\" o rjesson ,\ title title Strong light–matter interactions: a new direction within chemistry , \ 10.1039/c8cs00193f journal journal Chemical Society Reviews \ volume 48 ,\ pages 937–961 ( year 201...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author A. P. \ Deshmukh , author N. Geue , author N. C. \ Bradbury , author T. L. \ Atallah , author C. Chuang , author M. Pengshung , author J. Cao , author E. M. \ Sletten , author D. Neuhauser , \ and\ author J. R. \ Caram ,\ title title Bridging the gap between h- a...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Rui , author D

    author author J. Rui , author D. Wei , author A. Rubio-Abadal , author S. Hollerith , author J. Zeiher , author D. M. \ Stamper-Kurn , author C. Gross , \ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ title title A subradiant optical mirror formed by a single structured atomic layer , \ 10.1038/s41...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Srakaew , author P

    author author K. Srakaew , author P. Weckesser , author S. Hollerith , author D. Wei , author D. Adler , author I. Bloch , \ and\ author J. Zeiher ,\ title title A subwavelength atomic array switched by a single rydberg atom , \ 10.1038/s41567-023-01959-y journal journal Natur...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author N. S. \ Mueller , author Y. Okamura , author B. G. M. \ Vieira , author S. Juergensen , author H. Lange , author E. B. \ Barros , author F. Schulz , \ and\ author S. Reich ,\ title title Deep strong light–matter coupling in plasmonic nanoparticle crystals , \ 10....

    doi

  14. [22]

    Cherniukh , author G

    author author I. Cherniukh , author G. Rainò , author T. St\" o ferle , author M. Burian , author A. Travesset , author D. Naumenko , author H. Amenitsch , author R. Erni , author R. F. \ Mahrt , author M. I. \ Bodnarchuk , \ and\ author M. V. \ Kovalenko ,\ title title Perovs...

    doi

  15. [23]

    G\" u nder , author K

    author author D. G\" u nder , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , \ and\ author G. Witte ,\ title title Van der waals bound organic/2d insulator hybrid structures: Epitaxial growth of acene films on hbn(001) and the influence of surface defects , \ 10.1021/acsami.0c0952...

    doi

  16. [24]

    G\" u nder , author M

    author author D. G\" u nder , author M. Axt , \ and\ author G. Witte ,\ title title Heteroepitaxy in organic/tmd hybrids and challenge to achieve it for tmd monolayers: The case of pentacene on ws2 and wse2 , \ 10.1021/acsami.3c15829 journal journal ACS Applied Materials & Int...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Zhao , author Y

    author author H. Zhao , author Y. Zhao , author Y. Song , author M. Zhou , author W. Lv , author L. Tao , author Y. Feng , author B. Song , author Y. Ma , author J. Zhang , author J. Xiao , author Y. Wang , author D.-H. \ Lien , author M. Amani , author H. Kim , author X. Chen...

  18. [26]

    Juergensen , author M

    author author S. Juergensen , author M. Kessens , author C. Berrezueta-Palacios , author N. Severin , author S. Ifland , author J. P. \ Rabe , author N. S. \ Mueller , \ and\ author S. Reich ,\ title title Collective states in molecular monolayers on 2d materials , \ 10.1021/a...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Zhang , author M

    author author L. Zhang , author M. Ge , author B. Zhao , author K. Xu , author W. Xie , author Z. Zou , author W. Li , author J. Zhao , author T. Wang , \ and\ author W. Du ,\ title title Room-temperature exciton polaritons in a monolayer molecular crystal , \ @noop journal jo...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Gómez , author H

    author author U. Gómez , author H. Port , \ and\ author H. Wolf ,\ title title Excited-state relaxation of ultrathin meptcdi films interacting with inorganic substrates , \ 10.1016/s0022-2313(97)00158-0 journal journal Journal of Luminescence \ volume 76–77 ,\ pages 368–370 ( ...

    doi

  21. [29]

    u rthner , author T. E. \ Kaiser , \ and\ author C. R. \ Saha‐M\

    author author F. W\" u rthner , author T. E. \ Kaiser , \ and\ author C. R. \ Saha‐M\" o ller ,\ title title J‐aggregates: From serendipitous discovery to supramolecular engineering of functional dye materials , \ 10.1002/anie.201002307 journal journal Angewandte Chemie Intern...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Chaves , author J

    author author A. Chaves , author J. G. \ Azadani , author H. Alsalman , author D. R. \ da Costa , author R. Frisenda , author A. J. \ Chaves , author S. H. \ Song , author Y. D. \ Kim , author D. He , author J. Zhou , author A. Castellanos-Gomez , author F. M. \ Peeters , auth...

  23. [31]

    Waldecker , author A

    author author L. Waldecker , author A. Raja , author M. R\" o sner , author C. Steinke , author A. Bostwick , author R. J. \ Koch , author C. Jozwiak , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author E. Rotenberg , author T. O. \ Wehling , \ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ titl...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Le Thomas , author R

    author author N. Le Thomas , author R. Houdré , author M. V. \ Kotlyar , author D. O’Brien , \ and\ author T. F. \ Krauss ,\ title title Exploring light propagating in photonic crystals with fourier optics , \ 10.1364/josab.24.002964 journal journal Journal of the Optical Soci...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Li , author I

    author author M. Li , author I. Sinev , author F. Benimetskiy , author T. Ivanova , author E. Khestanova , author S. Kiriushechkina , author A. Vakulenko , author S. Guddala , author M. Skolnick , author V. M. \ Menon , author D. Krizhanovskii , author A. Al \`u , author A. Sa...

    2021

  26. [34]

    Wertz , author L

    author author E. Wertz , author L. Ferrier , author D. D. \ Solnyshkov , author R. Johne , author D. Sanvitto , author A. Lemaître , author I. Sagnes , author R. Grousson , author A. V. \ Kavokin , author P. Senellart , author G. Malpuech , \ and\ author J. Bloch ,\ title titl...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Dirnberger , author J

    author author F. Dirnberger , author J. Quan , author R. Bushati , author G. M. \ Diederich , author M. Florian , author J. Klein , author K. Mosina , author Z. Sofer , author X. Xu , author A. Kamra , author F. J. \ García-Vidal , author A. Alù , \ and\ author V. M. \ Menon ,...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author J. A. \ Schuller , author S. Karaveli , author T. Schiros , author K. He , author S. Yang , author I. Kymissis , author J. Shan , \ and\ author R. Zia ,\ title title Orientation of luminescent excitons in layered nanomaterials , \ 10.1038/nnano.2013.20 journal jo...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Scott , author J

    author author R. Scott , author J. Heckmann , author A. V. \ Prudnikau , author A. Antanovich , author A. Mikhailov , author N. Owschimikow , author M. Artemyev , author J. I. \ Climente , author U. Woggon , author N. B. \ Grosse , \ and\ author A. W. \ Achtstein ,\ title titl...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Gao , author M

    author author Y. Gao , author M. C. \ Weidman , \ and\ author W. A. \ Tisdale ,\ title title Cdse nanoplatelet films with controlled orientation of their transition dipole moment , \ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01237 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 17 ,\ pages 3837–3843 ( yea...

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author L. M. \ Schneider , author S. S. \ Esdaille , author D. A. \ Rhodes , author K. Barmak , author J. C. \ Hone , \ and\ author A. Rahimi-Iman ,\ title title Direct measurement of the radiative pattern of bright and dark excitons and exciton complexes in encapsulate...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Han , author S

    author author B. Han , author S. Stephan , author J. J. P. \ Thompson , author M. Esmann , author C. Antón-Solanas , author H. Shan , author N. Kunte , author S. Brem , author S. Tongay , author C. Lienau , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author M. Silies , author E...

    doi

  33. [41]

    author author N. C. \ Passler \ and\ author A. Paarmann ,\ title title Generalized 4 × 4 matrix formalism for light propagation in anisotropic stratified media: study of surface phonon polaritons in polar dielectric heterostructures , \ 10.1364/josab.34.002128 journal journal ...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author N. C. \ Passler , author M. Jeannin , \ and\ author A. Paarmann ,\ title title Layer-resolved absorption of light in arbitrarily anisotropic heterostructures , \ 10.1103/physrevb.101.165425 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 101 ( year 2020 ),\ 10.1103/ph...

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author D. Y. \ Zang , author F. F. \ So , \ and\ author S. R. \ Forrest ,\ title title "giant anisotropies in the dielectric properties of quasi-epitaxial crystalline organic semiconductor thin films , \ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 823--...

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.