Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Complete background cosmology of parity-even quadratic metric-affine gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the most general parity-even quadratic metric-affine action, the paper derives the complete FLRW background equations and shows that only 16 coupling combinations matter.

desk verdict First complete background equations for parity-even quadratic MAG; the core is solid, but the abstract overclaims on the integrable branch and the minisuperspace reduction merits a closer look. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15329 v1 pith:J7QUMYWC submitted 2024-12-19 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Thomas Dyer , Will Barker , Damianos Iosifidis This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th MSC 83D0583F05 PACS 04.50.Kd98.80.-k
keywords metric-affinegravityquadratictorsionnon-metricityFLRWcosmologyK-screeningdeSitterexpansionparticlespectra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out the complete background cosmology of the most general parity-symmetric metric-affine gravity theory whose action is quadratic in curvature, torsion, and non-metricity, with 27 free couplings on top of the Einstein constant. By reducing the action to a homogeneous, isotropic spacetime, the paper shows that only 16 combinations of these couplings affect the background dynamics, and it derives the full modified Friedmann, torsion, and non-metricity equations in closed form. Two special branches stand out: a K-screening branch in which spatial curvature disappears from every field equation, and an integrable branch whose late-time expansion is (anti-)de Sitter. The paper also identifies the most general model that reproduces the exact Friedmann equations of general relativity and makes the full equation set available in machine-readable form. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives the reference system for testing whether this large theory space can address open cosmological questions such as curvature and Hubble tensions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the general QMAG Lagrangian density in Eq. (25), together with a two-step reduction. First, computer algebra finds all linear relations among the quadratic operators in an FLRW setting: of the 16 curvature operators only 8 are independent, and of the 11 torsion/non-metricity operators only 8 are independent; this yields the reduced couplings $d_1,\dots,d_{16}$ in Eq. (30). Second, a minisuperspace variational calculation treats the scale factor, the lapse, and the five distortion scalars $X,Y,Z,V,W$ as fields and produces the full equations in Appendix B. The special branches are selected by setting combinations of reduced couplings to zero: Eq. (42) for K-screening and Eq. (43) for integrability. The Bianchi-identity identity (33) is what upgrades the first Friedmann equation to the second.

What would settle it

Choose the sub-action containing only $a_0$, $c_1$, and $a_1$, compute the Euler-Lagrange equations covariantly from Eq. (25) without imposing isotropy, then insert the FLRW ansatz and compare the result with the corresponding limit of the Appendix B equations. If any independent background equation differs, the minisuperspace reduction has produced equations that are not the covariant ones, and the calculation would settle whether the Palais-principle assumption holds for the independent connection.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the general parity-preserving quadratic metric-affine action, the full set of FLRW background equations is derived and organized. The central claim is that, despite 27 independent couplings plus $a_0$, only 16 reduced parameters influence the background dynamics; the paper obtains the modified first and second Friedmann equations together with the five distortion-field equations. Two special parameter branches are identified: conditions (42), $a_0=d_1=d_2=d_3=0$, screen the Riemannian spatial curvature $K$ completely from the dynamics, and conditions (43) make the system integrable and force late-time (anti-)de Sitter expansion. Linearised particle spectra are computed for these branches, and requiring the absence of ghosts, tachyons, and higher-spin modes picks out in each branch a minimal model, essentially the square of the Holst pseudoscalar and the square of the homothetic curvature, respectively. The paper also determines the most general model that returns exactly the Friedmann equations of general relativity.

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation assumes that fixing the space to be homogeneous and isotropic before taking variations of the action gives the same equations as varying first and restricting afterward; if that swap fails for the independent connection, the printed equations do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any parity-even quadratic metric-affine model, the background cosmology can now be written down without re-deriving equations of motion.
  • The K-screening conditions identify a concrete parameter region where spatial curvature is invisible to the background dynamics, offering a starting point for models that address the curvature tension in Lambda-CDM.
  • The integrable branch provides exact analytic solutions for the Hubble parameter and distortion fields, including late-time de Sitter or anti-de Sitter phases.
  • The no-ghost and no-tachyon analyses reduce the two branches to very small particle sectors, singling out the Holst-square and homothetic-curvature-square kinetic terms as the natural consistent limits.
  • The machine-readable equation files make the full system available for numerical studies, parameter scans, and future perturbation analyses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the same reduction technique should extend to parity-violating quadratic metric-affine gravity, with the pseudoscalar $W$ acquiring additional parity-odd couplings; the relations derived here form the parity-even baseline to which those terms would be added.
  • My inference: if K-screening survives beyond the background, curvature-induced contributions to cosmological perturbations would also be suppressed, a prediction that could be tested by computing the perturbation equations in that branch and comparing with CMB distance measurements.
  • My inference: because only the 16 reduced couplings enter the background equations, a phenomenological search can scan that smaller parameter space directly instead of the original 27 couplings, substantially shrinking the search cost for viable models.
  • My inference: the paper's conjecture that only the Holst-square and homothetic-square kinetic operators are self-consistent points toward a small viable island in parameter space, and a functional renormalization group analysis would test whether this island is radiatively stable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives the complete background cosmology of the general parity-even quadratic metric-affine gravity action (Eq. (25)), which contains 27 independent couplings plus the Einstein constant. Using a FLRW minisuperspace reduction, the authors obtain the modified Friedmann, torsion, and non-metricity equations, and identify a reduced set of 17 couplings relevant at the background level. They then isolate two special branches: a K-screening branch in which spatial curvature is absent from all equations (Eq. (42)), and an integrable branch that is claimed to asymptote to (anti-)de Sitter expansion (Eq. (43)). Particle spectra are computed with the PSALTer software, leading to further parameter restrictions. The full equations for closed, open, and flat cosmologies are provided in supplemental files for SymPy, Mathematica, and Maple.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, this paper supplies a valuable reference system for background cosmology in a very large theory space, and the computer-algebra pipeline (Gröbner-basis reductions, Macaulay2, PSALTer, and supplementary equation files) is a genuine strength. The K-screening and integrable branches are concrete, falsifiable submodels, and the paper is honest about their limitations, including the admitted superficiality of the particle-spectrum analysis. However, the central claim of completeness rests on an unverified application of symmetric criticality to the independent affine connection, and one abstract claim (the most general GR-reproducing model) is not located in the main text.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IIIB and Appendix B] The minisuperspace reduction of the independent affine connection relies on Palais' principle of symmetric criticality, but the cited theorems (Refs. [134-137]) are stated for spatially homogeneous metric systems and do not automatically cover the 64-component connection whose equations of motion are second-order in the curvature-squared sector. The claim that the metric 'fulfills the requirements' does not establish that the full field-content of the action satisfies the Palais conditions. This matters because Eqs. (B3)-(B7) contain second derivatives of the distortion scalars (e.g. the alpha X-double-dot term in Eq. (B3) and the W-double-dot term in Eq. (B7)); it is precisely in such derivative-coupled sectors that symmetric criticality can fail. The calibrations in Section IIIB only test the Einstein-Hilbert and torsion/non-metricity limits, where the connection equations are algebraic, so they do not exercise the curvature-squared operators. I ask the authors to provide either a direct check that the covariant field equations of Eq. (25), evaluated on the FLRW ansatz, coincide with Eqs. (B1)-(B7), or a proof that the symmetry group action on the full field space, including the connection, satisfies the Fels-Torre conditions.
  2. [Abstract and Section IV] The abstract asserts that 'the most general model is also found which reproduces the exact Friedmann equations of general relativity,' but I cannot locate this result in the main text. The closest statements are the conditions d1=d2=d3=0 in Section IIIB and the torsion/non-metricity limit of Eq. (34), neither of which is identified as the 'most general' GR-reproducing model, and Eq. (34) actually gives H=0 rather than the Friedmann equations. If this claim is established in the supplementary materials, the authors should state the precise condition in the main text; otherwise the abstract overstates the paper's content.
  3. [Equations (66)-(69) and Section V] The claim that the integrable branch 'always transitions to a de Sitter or anti-de Sitter epoch in the late Universe' is stronger than what Eq. (69) shows. For mu_2 omega_0 > 0, the large-time limit of Eq. (69) gives H -> -omega_0, which is a contracting exponential scale factor, not an expanding de Sitter phase, unless one reverses the time direction. For mu_2 omega_0 < 0 one obtains H -> +omega_0. The boundary case in Eq. (70) gives tangent, not asymptotic de Sitter, behavior. The conclusion should be restricted to the appropriate sign of mu_2 omega_0 and should say 'asymptotically (anti-)de Sitter' rather than 'always ... expansion'.
  4. [Section IVA, Eq. (42)] The K-screening condition is stated as a 'we find' result, but the full K-dependent equations are relegated to the supplemental materials [144], and the main text gives no indication of how Eq. (42) was derived or why it is sufficient to remove K from every field equation. Since K-screening is a headline claim, the authors should either display the K-dependent terms that are eliminated by Eq. (42) in an appendix or provide a precise pointer to the supplemental equation numbers. Without this, the claim is not verifiable from the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'graivtational' in the Introduction, 'particlular' and 'wheere' in Section IV, 'somwhat' in Appendix C, 'analagous' in the K-screening discussion, and 'diffeomeorphisms' in Section IVB. A careful proofread is recommended.
  2. [Equation (46)] The notation 'Y ∝ V ∝ Z ∝ X = X0 = const.' is confusing; since all quantities are proportional to X, it would be clearer to write each as a constant times X with the proportionality factors named explicitly.
  3. [Section IIIA, Eq. (27)] The sentence 'three relations' is followed by a list of three relations, but the second and third relations contain terms such as '3 A9 + A10 - A11 = 0' that mix different operator families; this is fine, but the display would benefit from clear labels A1, A2, A3 so the text can refer to them individually.
  4. [Appendix C, figure captions] The captions state that each figure is 'a vector graphic: all details are visible under magnification.' In a printed journal this phrase is not actionable; please provide the full spectrograph data also in a tabular or textual form, or refer the reader to the supplemental materials.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FLRW background equations are derived from the explicit quadratic action; branch conditions are transparent parameter restrictions, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's principal result, the FLRW background system for Eq. (25), is obtained by substituting the symmetry-reduced fields (12) and (14) into the action and varying with respect to {a,b,X,Y,Z,V,W}. The resulting equations (B1)-(B7) are functions of the action's couplings; no parameter is fitted to a target output. The operator relations in Eqs. (27)-(28) are algebraic identities computed from the definitions C_i = δS/δc_i and A_i = δS/δa_i using Gröbner-basis and kernel methods; the remark that they are 'consistent with the results in [128]' is a post-hoc check, not the source of the relations. The K-screening and integrable branches are obtained by imposing explicit coefficient conditions, Eq. (42) and Eq. (43), which the text itself describes as extra parameter constraints and 'somewhat arbitrary'; this is model selection, not a prediction that is forced by construction. The particle-spectroscopy constraints in Appendix C are likewise imposed to eliminate unwanted modes and then evaluated with the PSALTer code, so the spectra are outputs of a computation, not inputs. The minisuperspace/symmetric-criticality step is a substantive mathematical premise: the paper invokes Palais' principle through external citations ([135,136]) and checks the Einstein-Hilbert limit and the torsion/non-metricity calibration of [127,128]. Even if that premise failed, the error would be a technical gap, not a circular reduction. The self-citations that appear (e.g., [128], [131], [141]) are consistency checks or contextual remarks and do not carry the load of the derivation. No step in the chain, by the paper's own equations, is equivalent by construction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivations rest on standard geometric identities and the stated cosmological ansatz. No data are fitted; the branch conditions are chosen by hand. The paper's main unacknowledged input is the assumption that the minisuperspace variation and the linearized particle tests are faithful, both of which the authors partially flag.

free parameters (5)
  • Reduced coupling set {a0, d1..d16} = generic, unfitted
    The 17 linear combinations of the original 28 couplings that survive in the FLRW background (Eq. (30)); the theory does not fix their values.
  • K-screening constraints = a0 = 0, d1 = 0, d2 = 0, d3 = 0
    Conditions in Eq. (42) chosen by hand so that spatial curvature K drops out of all field equations; this defines the branch rather than predicting it.
  • Integrable-branch constraints = d1 = d2 = d3 = d4 = d5 = 0, d6 = d7
    Conditions in Eq. (43) chosen to remove odd powers of H and enable analytic integration; the authors call them 'somewhat arbitrary'.
  • Particle-tuning constraints for K-screening model = Eqs. (C1)-(C5)
    Additional constraints imposed sequentially in Appendix C to produce a simple massive 0- spectrum; these are model-selection choices.
  • Particle-tuning constraints for Maxwell-limit model = Eqs. (C7)-(C10)
    Additional constraints imposed in Appendix C to make masses diverge and yield an Einstein-Maxwell-like spectrum.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The FLRW ansatz for the distortion tensor (Eq. (14)) spans all homogeneous and isotropic affine connections
    Used to reduce the 64 connection components to five scalars; derived from Lie derivative arguments but an assumption about the cosmological principle.
  • domain assumption Palais' principle of symmetric criticality applies to the independent-connection minisuperspace reduction
    Invoked in Section IIIB to justify varying the reduced action; if it fails, Eqs. (B1)-(B7) may not match the covariant equations.
  • domain assumption Linearized particle spectrum near Minkowski spacetime is a valid necessary test of consistency
    Used in Section IV and Appendix C; the authors note it is necessary but not sufficient, and strong coupling can invalidate the linear analysis.
  • domain assumption Computer algebra outputs (Mathematica GroebnerBasis, Macaulay2, PSALTer) are correct for the stated computations
    The paper relies on these tools for operator relations and particle spectra without independent proof of the outputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complete background cosmology of parity-even quadratic metric-affine gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7QUMYWC

@misc{pith2026241215329,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complete background cosmology of parity-even quadratic metric-affine gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7QUMYWC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15329}
}
read the original abstract

The cosmology of metric-affine gravity is studied for the general, parity preserving action quadratic in curvature, torsion and non-metricity. The model contains 27 a priori independent couplings in addition to the Einstein constant. Linear and higher order relations between the quadratic operators in a Friedmann--Lemaitre--Robertson--Walker spacetime are obtained, along with the modified Friedmann, torsion and non-metricity equations. Extra parameter constraints lead to two special branches of the model. Firstly, a branch is found in which the Riemannian spatial curvature (thought to be slightly closed or flat in the Lambda-CDM model of our Universe) is entirely screened from all the field equations, regardless of its true value. Secondly, an integrable branch is found which yields (anti) de Sitter expansion at late times. The particle spectra of these two branches are studied, and the need to eliminate higher-spin particles as well as ghosts and tachyons motivates further parameter constraints in each case. The most general model is also found which reproduces the exact Friedmann equations of general relativity. The full set of equations describing closed, open or flat cosmologies, for general parity-even quadratic metric-affine gravity, is made available for SymPy, Mathematica and Maple platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15329 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left: the effect of the curvature in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Kinematic structure of the metric perturbation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Kinematic structure of the affine connection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Partial particle spectrograph of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Complete particle spectrograph of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Partial particle spectrograph of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Complete particle spectrograph of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Complete particle spectrograph of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The particle spectra of parity-violating theories: A less radical approach and an upgrade of PSALTer

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors derive a simpler no-ghost condition based on a kinetic matrix and release a parity-violating upgrade of PSALTer, demonstrating it on Einstein-Cartan gravity with two scalar modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [128]

    Iosifidis and L

    D. Iosifidis and L. Ravera, Cosmology of quadratic metric- affine gravity, Physical Review D 105, 10.1103/phys- revd.105.024007 (2022)

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

  2. [4]

    Percacci and E

    R. Percacci and E. Sezgin, New class of ghost- and tachyon-free metric affine gravities, Physical Review D101, 10.1103/physrevd.101.084040 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.084040 2020

  3. [144]

    T. Dyer, D. Iosifidis, and W. Barker,Supplemental materials at www.github.com/wevbarker/SupplementalMaterials-2411

  4. [1]

    F.W.Hehl,J.McCrea,E.W.Mielke,andY.Ne’eman,Metric- affine gauge theory of gravity: field equations, noether identi- ties,worldspinors,andbreakingofdilationinvariance,Physics Reports 258, 10.1016/0370-1573(94)00111-f (1995)

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)00111-f 1995

  5. [2]

    Iosifidis,Metric-Affine Gravity and Cosmology/Aspects of Torsion and non-Metricity in Gravity Theories, Ph.D

    D. Iosifidis,Metric-Affine Gravity and Cosmology/Aspects of Torsion and non-Metricity in Gravity Theories, Ph.D. thesis (2019), arXiv:1902.09643 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [3]

    Iosifidis, Cosmological hyperfluids, torsion and non-metricity, The European Physical Journal C 80, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08634-z (2020)

    D. Iosifidis, Cosmological hyperfluids, torsion and non-metricity, The European Physical Journal C 80, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08634-z (2020)

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08634-z 2020

  7. [5]

    Jiménez Cano, Metric-affine Gauge theories of gravity

    A. Jiménez Cano, Metric-affine Gauge theories of gravity. Foundations and new insights, Ph.D. thesis, Granada U., Theor. Phys. Astrophys. (2021), arXiv:2201.12847 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [6]

    O. A. Belarbi and A. Meziane, Overview and perspectives on metric-affinegravity,J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 1766,012007(2021)

    2021

Show all 149 references
  1. [7]

    A.Baldazzi,O.Melichev,andR.Percacci,Metric-AffineGrav- ity as an effective field theory, Annals Phys.438, 168757 (2022), arXiv:2112.10193 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [8]

    M.BlagojevicandF.W.Hehl,GaugeTheoriesofGravitation, (2012), arXiv:1210.3775 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [9]

    A.Einstein,DieFeldgleichungenderGravitation,Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss18, 844 (1915)

    1915

  4. [10]

    the notion of hypermomentum, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A31, 111 (1976)

    F.W.Hehl,G.D.Kerlick,andP.vonderHeyde,Onhypermo- mentum in general relativity i. the notion of hypermomentum, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A31, 111 (1976)

    1976

  5. [11]

    F. W. Hehl, G. D. Kerlick, and P. von der Heyde, On hyper- momentum in general relativity ii. the geometry of spacetime, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A31, 524 (1976)

    1976

  6. [12]

    coupling hypermomentum to geometry, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A31, 823 (1976)

    F.W.Hehl,G.D.Kerlick,andP.vonderHeyde,Onhypermo- mentum in general relativity iii. coupling hypermomentum to geometry, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A31, 823 (1976)

    1976

  7. [13]

    Iosifidis, Non-Riemannian cosmology: The role of shear hypermomentum,Int.J.Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys

    D. Iosifidis, Non-Riemannian cosmology: The role of shear hypermomentum,Int.J.Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys. 18,2150129 (2021), arXiv:2010.00875 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Iosifidis and T

    D. Iosifidis and T. S. Koivisto, Hyperhydrodynamics: rela- tivistic viscous fluids from hypermomentum, JCAP05, 001, arXiv:2312.06780 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  9. [15]

    A.D.Sakharov,Vacuumquantumfluctuationsincurvedspace and the theory of gravitation, Soviet Physics Uspekhi34, 394 (1991)

    1991

  10. [16]

    F. Hehl, G. Kerlick, and P. Von der Heyde, On a new metric affine theory of gravitation, Physics Letters B63, 446 (1976)

    1976

  11. [17]

    Rigouzzo and S

    C. Rigouzzo and S. Zell, Coupling metric-affine gravity to the standard model and dark matter fermions, Phys. Rev. D108, 124067 (2023), arXiv:2306.13134 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Barker and S

    W. Barker and S. Zell, Consistent particle physics in metric- affine gravity from extended projective symmetry, (2024), arXiv:2402.14917 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30, 682 (1979)

    1979

  14. [21]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  15. [22]

    F.Zwicky,DieRotverschiebungvonextragalaktischenNebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta6, 110 (1933)

    1933

  16. [23]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Er- ratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [24]

    D.Scott,Thestandardmodelofcosmology: Askeptic’sguide, Proc.Int.Sch.Phys.Fermi 200,133(2020),arXiv:1804.01318 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [25]

    W.Handley,Curvaturetension: evidenceforacloseduniverse, Phys. Rev. D103, L041301 (2021), arXiv:1908.09139 [astro- ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A.Melchiorri,D.F.Mota,A.G.Riess,andJ.Silk,Intherealm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges forΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022), arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Bahamonde, K

    S. Bahamonde, K. F. Dialektopoulos, C. Escamilla-Rivera, G. Farrugia, V. Gakis, M. Hendry, M. Hohmann, J. Levi Said, J. Mifsud, and E. Di Valentino, Teleparallel gravity: from theory to cosmology, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026901 (2023), arXiv:2106.13793 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Beltrán Jiménez, L

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, L. Heisenberg, D. Iosifidis, A. Jiménez- Cano, and T. S. Koivisto, General teleparallel quadratic grav- ity, Phys. Lett. B805, 135422 (2020), arXiv:1909.09045 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [30]

    J. B. Jimenez, L. Heisenberg, and T. S. Koivisto, The geomet- rical trinity of gravity (2019), arXiv:1903.06830 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Weyl, Gravitation and electricity, Sitzungsber

    H. Weyl, Gravitation and electricity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.26, 465 (1918)

    1918

  25. [32]

    Weyl,Space-Time-Matter(Dover Publications, 1922)

    H. Weyl,Space-Time-Matter(Dover Publications, 1922)

    1922

  26. [33]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie), inAnnales sci- 13 entifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol

    É. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie), inAnnales sci- 13 entifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol. 40 (Gauthier- Villars, 1923) pp. 325–412

    1923

  27. [34]

    A.S.Eddington, TheMathematicalTheoryofRelativity (Cam- bridge University Press, 1923)

    1923

  28. [35]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de larelativitégénéralisée(premièrepartie)(suite),in Annalessci- entifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Vol

    É. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de larelativitégénéralisée(premièrepartie)(suite),in Annalessci- entifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Vol. 41 (Gauthier- Villars, 1924) pp. 1–25

    1924

  29. [36]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (deuxième partie), inAnnales sci- entifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol

    É. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (deuxième partie), inAnnales sci- entifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol. 42 (Gauthier- Villars, 1925) pp. 17–88

    1925

  30. [37]

    A.Einstein,EinheitlicheFeldtheorievonGravitationundElek- trizität, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss22, 414 (1925)

    1925

  31. [38]

    Einstein, Riemanngeometrie mit Aufrechterhaltung des Begriffes des Fern-Parallelismus, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Riemanngeometrie mit Aufrechterhaltung des Begriffes des Fern-Parallelismus, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss17, 217 (1928)

    1928

  32. [39]

    Einstein, Neue Möglichkeit für eine einheitliche Feldtheo- rievonGravitationundElektrizität,Sitzungsber.Preuss.Akad

    A. Einstein, Neue Möglichkeit für eine einheitliche Feldtheo- rievonGravitationundElektrizität,Sitzungsber.Preuss.Akad. Wiss18, 224 (1928)

    1928

  33. [40]

    Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction, Phys

    R. Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction, Phys. Rev.101, 1597 (1956)

    1956

  34. [41]

    D. W. Sciama, On the analogy between charge and spin in general relativity, inRecent developments in general relativ- ity(Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1962) p. 415

    1962

  35. [42]

    T.W.B.Kibble,Lorentzinvarianceandthegravitationalfield, J. Math. Phys.2, 212 (1961)

    1961

  36. [43]

    Blagojevic,Gravitation and gauge symmetries(2002)

    M. Blagojevic,Gravitation and gauge symmetries(2002)

    2002

  37. [44]

    Salvio, Quadratic Gravity, Front

    A. Salvio, Quadratic Gravity, Front. in Phys.6, 77 (2018), arXiv:1804.09944 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Salam and J

    A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Remarks on high-energy stability andrenormalizabilityofgravitytheory,Phys.Rev.D 18,4480 (1978)

    1978

  39. [46]

    K. S. Stelle, Renormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D16, 953 (1977)

    1977

  40. [47]

    M.B.EinhornandD.R.T.Jones,Renormalizable,asymptoti- callyfreegravitywithoutghostsortachyons,Phys.Rev.D 96, 124025 (2017), arXiv:1710.03795 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [48]

    J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field the- ory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

    1994 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Pagani and R

    C. Pagani and R. Percacci, Quantum gravity with torsion and non-metricity, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 195019 (2015), arXiv:1506.02882 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Percacci, Towards Metric-Affine Quantum Gravity, Int

    R. Percacci, Towards Metric-Affine Quantum Gravity, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 17, 2040003 (2020), arXiv:2003.09486 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Melichev and R

    O. Melichev and R. Percacci, On the renormalization of Poincaré gauge theories, JHEP 03, 133, arXiv:2307.02336 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  45. [52]

    Melichev, On the renormalization of Metric-Affine Gravity theories, (2024), arXiv:2406.14146 [hep-th]

    O. Melichev, On the renormalization of Metric-Affine Gravity theories, (2024), arXiv:2406.14146 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    E.Sezgin,ClassofGhostFreeGravityLagrangiansWithMas- sive or Massless Propagating Torsion, Phys. Rev. D24, 1677 (1981)

    1981

  47. [54]

    Blagojevic and I

    M. Blagojevic and I. A. Nikolic, Hamiltonian dynamics of Poincare gauge theory: General structure in the time gauge, Phys. Rev. D28, 2455 (1983)

    1983

  48. [55]

    Blagojevic and M

    M. Blagojevic and M. Vasilic, EXTRA GAUGE SYMME- TRIES IN A WEAK FIELD APPROXIMATION OF AN R + T**2 + R**2 THEORY OF GRAVITY, Phys. Rev. D35, 3748 (1987)

    1987

  49. [56]

    Kuhfuss and J

    R. Kuhfuss and J. Nitsch, Propagating Modes in Gauge Field Theories of Gravity, Gen. Rel. Grav.18, 1207 (1986)

    1986

  50. [57]

    Yo and J

    H.-j. Yo and J. M. Nester, Hamiltonian analysis of Poincare gaugetheoryscalarmodes,Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 8,459(1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9902032

    1999 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Yo and J

    H.-J. Yo and J. M. Nester, Hamiltonian analysis of Poincare gaugetheory: Higherspinmodes,Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 11,747 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0112030

    2002 arXiv

  52. [59]

    M.Blagojevic, Gravitationandgaugesymmetries (CRCPress, Bristol and Philadelphia, 2002)

    2002

  53. [60]

    Puetzfeld, Status of non-Riemannian cosmology, New As- tron

    D. Puetzfeld, Status of non-Riemannian cosmology, New As- tron. Rev.49, 59 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0404119

    2005 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Yo and J

    H.-J. Yo and J. M. Nester, Dynamic Scalar Torsion and an Oscillating Universe, Mod. Phys. Lett. A22, 2057 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612738

    2007 arXiv

  55. [62]

    K.-F.Shie,J.M.Nester,andH.-J.Yo,TorsionCosmologyand the Accelerating Universe, Phys. Rev. D78, 023522 (2008), arXiv:0805.3834 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  56. [63]

    D80, 104031 (2009), arXiv:0811.3781 [hep-th]

    V.P.Nair,S.Randjbar-Daemi,andV.Rubakov,MassiveSpin- 2fieldsofGeometricOrigininCurvedSpacetimes,Phys.Rev. D80, 104031 (2009), arXiv:0811.3781 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Nikiforova, S

    V. Nikiforova, S. Randjbar-Daemi, and V. Rubakov, Infrared Modified Gravity with Dynamical Torsion, Phys. Rev. D80, 124050 (2009), arXiv:0905.3732 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Chen, F.-H

    H. Chen, F.-H. Ho, J. M. Nester, C.-H. Wang, and H.-J. Yo, Cosmological dynamics with propagating Lorentz connection modes of spin zero, JCAP10, 027, arXiv:0908.3323 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  59. [66]

    73,056901(2010),arXiv:0912.5057[gr- qc]

    W.-T.Ni,Searchesfortheroleofspinandpolarizationingrav- ity,Rept.Prog.Phys. 73,056901(2010),arXiv:0912.5057[gr- qc]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Baekler, F

    P. Baekler, F. W. Hehl, and J. M. Nester, Poincare gauge the- ory of gravity: Friedman cosmology with even and odd par- ity modes. Analytic part, Phys. Rev. D83, 024001 (2011), arXiv:1009.5112 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Ho and J

    F.-H. Ho and J. M. Nester, Poincaré gauge theory with even and odd parity dynamic connection modes: isotropic Bianchi cosmological models, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.330, 012005 (2011), arXiv:1105.5001 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Ho and J

    F.-H. Ho and J. M. Nester, Poincaré Gauge Theory With Cou- pled Even And Odd Parity Dynamic Spin-0 Modes: Dynamic Equations For Isotropic Bianchi Cosmologies, Annalen Phys. 524, 97 (2012), arXiv:1106.0711 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Y.C.Ong,K.Izumi,J.M.Nester,andP.Chen,Problemswith Propagation and Time Evolution in f(T) Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 88, 024019 (2013), arXiv:1303.0993 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Puetzfeld and Y

    D. Puetzfeld and Y. N. Obukhov, Prospects of detecting spacetime torsion, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1442004 (2014), arXiv:1405.4137 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  65. [72]

    G. K. Karananas, The particle spectrum of parity-violating Poincaré gravitational theory, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 055012 (2015), arXiv:1411.5613 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Ni, Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity: a five-year update, Int

    W.-T. Ni, Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity: a five-year update, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.40, 1660010 (2016), arXiv:1501.07696 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  67. [74]

    F.-H. Ho, H. Chen, J. M. Nester, and H.-J. Yo, General PoincaréGaugeTheoryCosmology,Chin.J.Phys. 53,110109 (2015), arXiv:1512.01202 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [75]

    G. K. Karananas, Poincaré, Scale and Conformal Sym- metries Gauge Perspective and Cosmological Ramifica- tions, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Lausanne (2016), arXiv:1608.08451 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Y. N. Obukhov, Gravitational waves in Poincaré gauge grav- itytheory,Phys.Rev.D 95,084028(2017),arXiv:1702.05185 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [77]

    M.Blagojević,B.Cvetković,andY.N.Obukhov,Generalized plane waves in Poincaré gauge theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 14 96, 064031 (2017), arXiv:1708.08766 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Blagojević and B

    M. Blagojević and B. Cvetković, General Poincaré gauge the- ory: Hamiltonian structure and particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 98, 024014 (2018), arXiv:1804.05556 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Tseng,Gravitational Theories with Torsion, Ph.D

    H.-H. Tseng,Gravitational Theories with Torsion, Ph.D. the- sis,Taiwan,Natl.TsingHuaU.(2018),arXiv:1812.00314[gr- qc]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Y.-C.Lin,M.P.Hobson,andA.N.Lasenby,Ghostandtachyon free Poincaré gauge theories: A systematic approach, Phys. Rev. D99, 064001 (2019), arXiv:1812.02675 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Beltrán Jiménez and A

    J. Beltrán Jiménez and A. Delhom, Ghosts in metric-affine higher order curvature gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 656 (2019), arXiv:1901.08988 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Zhang and L

    H. Zhang and L. Xu, Late-time acceleration and inflation in a Poincaré gauge cosmological model, JCAP 09, 050, arXiv:1904.03545 [gr-qc]

    1904 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Aoki and K

    K. Aoki and K. Shimada, Scalar-metric-affine theories: Can wegetghost-freetheoriesfromsymmetry?,Phys.Rev.D 100, 044037 (2019), arXiv:1904.10175 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Zhang and L

    H. Zhang and L. Xu, Inflation in the parity-conserving Poincaré gauge cosmology, JCAP10, 003, arXiv:1906.04340 [gr-qc]

    1906 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Beltrán Jiménez and F

    J. Beltrán Jiménez and F. J. Maldonado Torralba, Revisiting the stability of quadratic Poincaré gauge gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 611 (2020), arXiv:1910.07506 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Y.-C. Lin, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Power-counting renormalizable, ghost-and-tachyon-free Poincaré gauge theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D101, 064038 (2020), arXiv:1910.14197 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Percacci and E

    R. Percacci and E. Sezgin, New class of ghost- and tachyon- free metric affine gravities, Phys. Rev. D101, 084040 (2020), arXiv:1912.01023 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [88]

    W. E. V. Barker, A. N. Lasenby, M. P. Hobson, and W. J. Handley, Systematic study of background cosmology in uni- taryPoincarégaugetheorieswithapplicationtoemergentdark radiation and𝐻0 tension, Phys. Rev. D102, 024048 (2020), arXiv:2003.02690 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [89]

    J.BeltránJiménezandA.Delhom,Instabilitiesinmetric-affine theories of gravity with higher order curvature terms, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 585 (2020), arXiv:2004.11357 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [90]

    F.J.MaldonadoTorralba, Neweffectivetheoriesofgravitation andtheirphenomenologicalconsequences ,Ph.D.thesis,Cape Town U., Dept. Math. (2020), arXiv:2101.11523 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  84. [91]

    V.Barker, A.N.Lasenby, M.P.Hobson,andW.J.Han- dley, Nonlinear Hamiltonian analysis of new quadratic torsion theories: Cases with curvature-free constraints, Phys

    W.E. V.Barker, A.N.Lasenby, M.P.Hobson,andW.J.Han- dley, Nonlinear Hamiltonian analysis of new quadratic torsion theories: Cases with curvature-free constraints, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084036 (2021), arXiv:2101.02645 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Marzo, Ghost and tachyon free propagation up to spin 3 in Lorentz invariant field theories, Phys

    C. Marzo, Ghost and tachyon free propagation up to spin 3 in Lorentz invariant field theories, Phys. Rev. D105, 065017 (2022), arXiv:2108.11982 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Marzo, Radiatively stable ghost and tachyon freedom in metric affine gravity, Phys

    C. Marzo, Radiatively stable ghost and tachyon freedom in metric affine gravity, Phys. Rev. D106, 024045 (2022), arXiv:2110.14788 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [94]

    de la Cruz Dombriz, F

    A. de la Cruz Dombriz, F. J. Maldonado Torralba, and D. F. Mota, Dark matter candidate from torsion, Phys. Lett. B834, 137488 (2022), arXiv:2112.03957 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Annala and S

    J. Annala and S. Rasanen, Stability of non-degenerate Ricci- typePalatinitheories,JCAP 04,014,[Erratum: JCAP08,E02 (2023)], arXiv:2212.09820 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Mikura, V

    Y. Mikura, V. Naso, and R. Percacci, Some simple theories of gravity with propagating torsion, Phys. Rev. D109, 104071 (2024), arXiv:2312.10249 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Mikura and R

    Y. Mikura and R. Percacci, Some simple theories of gravity withpropagatingnonmetricity, (2024),arXiv:2401.10097[gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [98]

    W.BarkerandC.Marzo,ParticlespectraofgeneralRicci-type Palatini or metric-affine theories, Phys. Rev. D109, 104017 (2024), arXiv:2402.07641 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [99]

    C.Møller,ConservationLawandAbsoluteParallelisminGen- eral Relativity, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Skr.1, 1 (1961)

    1961

  93. [100]

    Pellegrini and J

    C. Pellegrini and J. Plebanski, Tetrad Fields and Gravitational Fields, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Skr.2, 1 (1963)

    1963

  94. [101]

    K.HayashiandT.Nakano,Extendedtranslationinvarianceand associated gauge fields, Prog. Theor. Phys.38, 491 (1967)

    1967

  95. [102]

    Y. M. Cho, Einstein Lagrangian as the Translational Yang- Mills Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D14, 2521 (1976)

    1976

  96. [103]

    D 19, 3524 (1979), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 24, 3312–3314 (1982)]

    K.HayashiandT.Shirafuji,Newgeneralrelativity.,Phys.Rev. D 19, 3524 (1979), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 24, 3312–3314 (1982)]

    1979

  97. [104]

    Dimakis, The Initial Value Problem of the Poincare Gauge TheoryinVacuum.1: SecondOrderFormalism,Ann.Inst.H

    A. Dimakis, The Initial Value Problem of the Poincare Gauge TheoryinVacuum.1: SecondOrderFormalism,Ann.Inst.H. Poincare Phys. Theor.51, 371 (1989)

    1989

  98. [105]

    Dimakis, THE INITIAL VALUE PROBLEM OF THE POINCAREGAUGETHEORYINVACUUM.1: FIRSTOR- DER FORMALISM, Ann

    A. Dimakis, THE INITIAL VALUE PROBLEM OF THE POINCAREGAUGETHEORYINVACUUM.1: FIRSTOR- DER FORMALISM, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.51, 389 (1989)

    1989

  99. [106]

    Lemke, Shock waves in the Poincare gauge theory of gravi- tation, Phys

    J. Lemke, Shock waves in the Poincare gauge theory of gravi- tation, Phys. Lett. A143, 13 (1990)

    1990

  100. [107]

    R. D. Hecht, J. Lemke, and R. P. Wallner, Tachyonic torsion shock waves in Poincare gauge theory, Phys. Lett. A151, 12 (1990)

    1990

  101. [108]

    R. D. Hecht, J. Lemke, and R. P. Wallner, Can Poincare gauge theory be saved?, Phys. Rev. D44, 2442 (1991)

    1991

  102. [109]

    Afshordi, D

    N. Afshordi, D. J. H. Chung, and G. Geshnizjani, Cuscuton: A Causal Field Theory with an Infinite Speed of Sound, Phys. Rev. D75, 083513 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0609150

    2007 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Magueijo, Bimetric varying speed of light theories and primordial fluctuations, Phys

    J. Magueijo, Bimetric varying speed of light theories and primordial fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 79, 043525 (2009), arXiv:0807.1689 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Charmousis and A

    C. Charmousis and A. Padilla, The Instability of Vacua in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, JHEP12, 038, arXiv:0807.2864 [hep- th]

    arXiv

  105. [112]

    Charmousis, G

    C. Charmousis, G. Niz, A. Padilla, and P. M. Saffin, Strong coupling in Horava gravity, JHEP08, 070, arXiv:0905.2579 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  106. [113]

    Papazoglou and T

    A. Papazoglou and T. P. Sotiriou, Strong coupling in ex- tendedHorava-Lifshitzgravity,Phys.Lett.B 685,197(2010), arXiv:0911.1299 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Baumann, L

    D. Baumann, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, Scale- Invariance and the Strong Coupling Problem, JCAP05, 004, arXiv:1101.3320 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  108. [115]

    G.D’Amico,C.deRham,S.Dubovsky,G.Gabadadze,D.Pirt- skhalava,andA.J.Tolley,MassiveCosmologies,Phys.Rev.D 84, 124046 (2011), arXiv:1108.5231 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  109. [116]

    A.E.Gumrukcuoglu,C.Lin,andS.Mukohyama,Anisotropic Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe from nonlinear mas- sive gravity, Phys. Lett. B717, 295 (2012), arXiv:1206.2723 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  110. [117]

    A.Wang,HořavagravityataLifshitzpoint: Aprogressreport, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730014 (2017), arXiv:1701.06087 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [118]

    C.Mazuet,S.Mukohyama,andM.S.Volkov,Anisotropicde- formationsofspatiallyopencosmologyinmassivegravitythe- ory, JCAP04, 039, arXiv:1702.04205 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  112. [119]

    Beltrán Jiménez and A

    J. Beltrán Jiménez and A. Jiménez-Cano, On the strong cou- pling of Einsteinian Cubic Gravity and its generalisations, JCAP01, 069, arXiv:2009.08197 [gr-qc]. 15

    2009 arXiv

  113. [120]

    W. E. V. Barker, Supercomputers against strong coupling in gravity with curvature and torsion, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 228 (2023), arXiv:2206.00658 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Delhom, A

    A. Delhom, A. Jiménez-Cano, and F. J. Maldonado Torralba, Instabilities in Field Theory: A Primer with Applications in Modified Gravity (Springer, 2022) arXiv:2207.13431 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  115. [122]

    W.BarkerandS.Zell,Einstein-ProcatheoryfromtheEinstein- Cartan formulation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024007 (2024), arXiv:2306.14953 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  116. [123]

    Iosifidis and K

    D. Iosifidis and K. Pallikaris, Into the mag-verse or: Cosmol- ogy of the complete quadratic metric-affine gravity (2024), arXiv:2404.19498 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [124]

    Shimada, K

    K. Shimada, K. Aoki, and K.-i. Maeda, Metric-affine Gravity and Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104020 (2019), arXiv:1812.03420 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  118. [125]

    I. D. Gialamas and K. Tamvakis, Inflation in metric-affine quadratic gravity, JCAP03, 042, arXiv:2212.09896 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  119. [126]

    A. V. Minkevich and A. S. Garkun, Isotropic cosmology in metric-affine gauge theory of gravity (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9805007 [gr-qc]

    1998

  120. [127]

    Y. N. Obukhov, E. J. Vlachynsky, W. Esser, and F. W. Hehl, Irreducible decompositions in metric-affine gravity models, (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9705039 [gr-qc]

    1997 arXiv

  121. [129]

    39,095002(2022),arXiv:2112.09154[gr- qc]

    D.Iosifidis,Thefullquadraticmetric-affinegravity(including parity odd terms): exact solutions for the affine-connection, Class.Quant.Grav. 39,095002(2022),arXiv:2112.09154[gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Tsamparlis, Cosmological principle and torsion, Physics Letters A75, 27 (1979)

    M. Tsamparlis, Cosmological principle and torsion, Physics Letters A75, 27 (1979)

    1979

  123. [131]

    Iosifidis, Linear Transformations on Affine-Connections, Class.Quant.Grav

    D. Iosifidis, Linear Transformations on Affine-Connections, Class.Quant.Grav. 37,085010(2020),arXiv:1911.04535[gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  124. [132]

    G. N. Remmen and S. M. Carroll, Attractor Solutions in Scalar-Field Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D88, 083518 (2013), arXiv:1309.2611 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  125. [133]

    J. B. Achour, Proper time reparametrization in cosmology: Möbius symmetry and Kodama charges, JCAP12 (12), 005, arXiv:2103.10700 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  126. [134]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin, Shortcuts to high symmetry solutions in gravitational theories, Class. Quant. Grav.20, 4877 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0306114

    2003 arXiv

  127. [135]

    M. A. H. Maccallum and A. H. Taub, Variational princi- ples and spatially-homogeneous universes, including rotation, Commun. Math. Phys.25, 173 (1972)

    1972

  128. [136]

    M.FelsandC.Torre,Theprincipleofsymmetriccriticalityin general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity19(2001)

    2001

  129. [137]

    S.Hawking,OntheRotationoftheUniverse,MonthlyNotices of the Royal Astronomical Society142, 129 (1969)

    1969

  130. [138]

    D. A. Cox, J. B. Little, and D. O’Shea,Ideals, varieties, and algorithms : an introduction to computational algebraic ge- ometryandcommutativealgebra ,1sted.,Undergraduatetexts in mathematics (Springer New York, 1992)

    1992

  131. [139]

    D.R.GraysonandM.E.Stillman,Macaulay2,asoftwaresys- tem for research in algebraic geometry, Available athttp: //www2.macaulay2.com

  132. [140]

    Kolekar, On the Bianchi identity in generalized theories of gravity, Gen

    S. Kolekar, On the Bianchi identity in generalized theories of gravity, Gen. Rel. Grav.54, 92 (2022)

    2022

  133. [141]

    Iosifidis and T

    D. Iosifidis and T. Koivisto, Scale transformations in metric- affinegeometry,Universe 5,82(2019),arXiv:1810.12276[gr- qc]

    2019 arXiv

  134. [142]

    T.Koivisto,M.Hohmann,andT.Złośnik,TheGeneralLinear Cartan Khronon, Universe5, 168 (2019), arXiv:1905.02967 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Barker, Particle Spectrum for Any Tensor Lagrangian (PSALTer), download: github.com/wevbarker/PSALTer

    W. Barker, Particle Spectrum for Any Tensor Lagrangian (PSALTer), download: github.com/wevbarker/PSALTer

  136. [145]

    W.E.V.Barker,A.N.Lasenby,M.P.Hobson,andW.J.Hand- ley, Mapping Poincaré gauge cosmology to Horndeski theory for emergent dark energy, Phys. Rev. D102, 084002 (2020), arXiv:2006.03581 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  137. [146]

    Rew and W

    C. Rew and W. E. V. Barker, The effective inflation- ary potential of constant-torsion emergent gravity, (2023), arXiv:2302.07250 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  138. [147]

    Barker, Particle spectra of gravity based on internal sym- metry of quantum fields, (2023), arXiv:2311.11790 [hep-th]

    W. Barker, Particle spectra of gravity based on internal sym- metry of quantum fields, (2023), arXiv:2311.11790 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  139. [148]

    Barker, C

    W. Barker, C. Marzo, and C. Rigouzzo, PSALTer: Par- ticle Spectrum for Any Tensor Lagrangian, (2024), arXiv:2406.09500 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [149]

    Barker, M

    W. Barker, M. Hobson, A. Lasenby, Y.-C. Lin, and Z. Wei, Every Poincaré gauge theory is conformal: a compelling case fordynamicalvectortorsion, (2024),arXiv:2406.12826[hep- th]. A. Quadratic and cubic relations Distortion invariants — In this appendix we provide additional alg...

    2024 arXiv

  141. [150]

    (C5b) As was the experience with Eqs

    Eliminating them both independently yields, respectively 𝑐11 →2𝑐7, 𝑐 14 →3𝑐10+2𝑐13, 𝑐 15 →3𝑐10+2𝑐13, (C5a) 𝑐7 →0, 𝑐 10 →0, 𝑐 13 →0. (C5b) As was the experience with Eqs. (C3) and (C4), the whole of the1− sector is actually rendered non-propagating by Eqs. (C5a) and (C5b)...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.