Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Cryogenic field-cycling instrument for optical NMR hyperpolarization studies

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces a cryogenic field-cycling instrument that shuttles a sample between a low-field optical DNP site and 9.4 T NMR readout, covering 10 mT to 9.4 T and about 10 K to 300 K, and demonstrates it on carbon-13 spins in…

desk verdict A genuinely new cryogenic field-cycling instrument for optical DNP, with credible diamond demonstrations, but the abstract oversells its applicability given the slow 91-second shuttle. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16471 v1 pith:JGBSGT67 submitted 2024-12-21 quant-ph physics.chem-phphysics.ins-det

Noella D'Souza , Kieren A. Harkins , Cooper Selco , Ushoshi Basumallick , Samantha Breuer , Zhuorui Zhang , Paul Reshetikhin , Marcus Ho
show 5 more authors
Aniruddha Nayak Maxwell McAllister Emanuel Druga David Marchiori Ashok Ajoy
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.chem-phphysics.ins-det
keywords fieldcyclingdynamicnuclearpolarizationopticalhyperpolarizationcryogenicNMRnitrogen-vacancycentersspinrelaxationspin-lockpulsesequencesinstrumentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Optical dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) can boost NMR signals, but candidate materials vary strongly in how their electron polarization and relaxation times respond to magnetic field and temperature. This paper introduces a cryogenic field-cycling instrument meant to make such studies possible in one setup, shuttling a cryostat between a low-field optical DNP site and a 9.4 T NMR readout. The claimed coverage is 10 mT to 9.4 T and about 10 K to 300 K, with continuous cryogen replenishment for multi-day runs and the ability to apply millions of RF pulses. The authors demonstrate the instrument by hyperpolarizing carbon-13 nuclei in diamond with optically pumped nitrogen-vacancy centers, reporting large SNR gains, long spin-lock lifetimes, and field-dependent $T_1$ measurements.

What carries the argument

The central object is cryogenic field cycling: a sample-bearing cryostat moved vertically inside the bore of a 9.4 T magnet so that the sample position sets the magnetic field. The low-field DNP site sits at about 27 mT, the readout site at the 9.4 T sweet spot, and the roughly 91 s transit crosses the short-$T_1$ low-field region in under 3 s. Two hardware elements make it work: cryogen delivery that moves with the cryostat (a travelling liquid-nitrogen line or a closed-loop helium system) and eddy-current compensation through a high-torque gearbox plus a spring-loaded load balancer. A pulse-streaming synchronizer coordinates laser shuttering, microwave pulses, shuttling motion, and RF acquisition, while the cryostat body serves as the RF shield and a rigidly mounted RF coil supports windowed spin-lock pulse trains with millions of pulses.

What would settle it

One decisive test: hyperpolarize a sample whose nuclear $T_1$ near 27 mT and 10 K is comparable to or shorter than the roughly 3 s low-field transit, then measure retained polarization after one full shuttle cycle; if little survives, the broad-applicability claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

What the authors establish is that a complete cryostat can be shuttled into a high-field NMR magnet while keeping the sample cold and optically addressable, making cryogenic field cycling practical for optical DNP. Two design innovations carry this: continuous cryogen replenishment through a moving transfer line or a closed-cycle helium loop that holds the sample near 10 K during shuttling, and mechanical compensation of eddy-current forces via a high-torque gearbox and a spring-loaded load balancer. The demonstrated results on carbon-13 in NV-diamond include hyperpolarized signals with more than 100-fold SNR gain over thermal equilibrium, spin-lock lifetimes over 10,000-fold longer than the free-induction decay, and $T_1$ relaxometry at 27 mT and 9.4 T. Taken together, these show that the instrument can polarize, shuttle, and interrogate nuclear spins under cryogenic conditions with high temporal resolution.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the roughly 91 s shuttle does not destroy the hyperpolarization, relying on long $T_1$ at cryogenic temperatures and high fields and on crossing the short-$T_1$ low-field region in under 3 s; the authors demonstrate this only for carbon-13 in diamond.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Optical DNP mechanisms can be mapped across field and temperature in a single instrument, removing the need to build separate setups for low-field, X-band, and high-field studies.
  • Continuous replenishment allows experiments that run for days, including repeated field-cycling cycles, without manual cryogen refills.
  • Windowed spin-lock readouts with millions of pulses resolve nuclear decay curves at one point per pulse, so $T'_2$ profiles can be examined beyond a single exponential time constant.
  • Hyperpolarized nuclei can be allowed to relax at chosen intermediate fields and read out at 9.4 T, yielding $T_1$-versus-field data such as the 386 s at 27 mT and 3094 s at 9.4 T reported at 100 K.
  • The diamond demonstration provides a reference benchmark for extending the same instrument to other optical DNP systems, including organic triplet and molecular color-center candidates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The advertised range of 10 mT to 9.4 T and 10 K to 300 K describes what the hardware can reach; the sample classes that actually benefit are those whose $T_1$ survives the 91 s shuttle, so a short cryogenic low-field $T_1$ would shrink the practical scope.
  • Decomposing the dense spin-lock decays with Laplace inversion, as the authors sketch, could separate electron-mediated and nuclear-mediated relaxation channels and directly test their quenching hypothesis for the $T'_2$ increase at low temperature.
  • Replacing the metal cryostat body or shuttling only the sample inside a stationary cryostat would reduce eddy currents and shorten transit, which the authors list as future directions and which would widen the applicable materials.
  • Parking the shuttle at intermediate positions should let the same optics and microwave chain drive DNP at X-, Q-, or W-band fields, connecting this instrument to high-field all-optical hyperpolarization strategies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper describes the design, construction, and demonstration of a cryogenic field-cycling instrument for optical dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) studies. The instrument shuttles an entire cryostat between a low-field optical-DNP region (down to 10 mT) and a high-field (9.4 T) NMR detection region, with two cryogen-delivery approaches (liquid nitrogen for 77 K–RT and a closed-cycle liquid helium system for ~10 K). The authors report continuous cryogen replenishment, optical illumination across the field range, and a dual-purpose RF/MW probe. Demonstrations on 13C spins in NV-doped diamond include FID and pulsed spin-lock readouts with millions of RF pulses, DNP-EPR mapping at RT and 100 K, field-cycling T1 relaxometry at 27 mT and 9.4 T, and an application to nanoscale spin textures. The central claim is that the instrument enables optical DNP studies across 10 mT–9.4 T and ~10 K–300 K.

Significance. If the reported range and capabilities hold, this instrument would be a useful addition to the optical-DNP community, particularly for variable-field and variable-temperature studies. The paper's strengths are its detailed engineering descriptions with part numbers, the explicit discussion of design tradeoffs (e.g., eddy currents, shuttling time), and the demonstration of sustained multi-million-pulse spin-lock readouts at cryogenic temperatures. The continuous-cryogen-replenishment designs (Approaches I and II) are clearly explained and address a practical limitation of earlier shuttling systems. The demonstration of DNP-EPR mapping and field-cycling relaxometry is valuable. However, the quantitative performance claims are based on single measurements, and the broad generality claim in the abstract is not fully supported by the data, which is limited to 13C in diamond.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. II.A] The abstract claims that the instrument 'facilitates optical DNP studies across a wide range of magnetic fields (10mT to 9.4T) and temperatures (10K to 300K)' without the practical boundary explicitly acknowledged in Sec. II.A. That section states that the ~91 s shuttling time with <3 s in the low-field region 'sets a practical boundary on the types of materials currently suitable on the instrument.' The paper only validates this traversal for 13C in diamond at 100 K (T1 = 386 s at 27 mT). Many optical-DNP candidate materials named in the introduction, including organic triplet hosts and rare-earth complexes, can have substantially shorter nuclear T1 at low field and/or at higher temperatures; the current data do not show that the 91 s shuttle preserves hyperpolarization for such materials. The abstract and conclusions should either be qualified to state that the full range is currently demonstrated for diamond-like systems, or the authors should provide measurements on at least one additional material with a shorter low-field T1.
  2. [Sec. III.A and Sec. III.C, Figs. 6, 7, 9] The quantitative performance claims rest on single measurements without error bars or repeats. Specifically, T2' = 93.5 s (Fig. 6B), the '>100-fold increase in SNR' (Fig. 6D), the '>200-fold increase' in the text, and the T1 values T1 = 386 s and T1 = 3094 s (Fig. 9) are each reported as single-shot measurements (as stated in Sec. III.C: 'Each data point is a single-shot measurement'). Without uncertainty estimates or at least duplicate runs, these numbers cannot be compared with results from other instruments or evaluated for statistical significance. The authors should either provide repeat measurements with standard deviations or clearly present these as illustrative single-shot demonstrations and avoid exact numeric performance claims.
  3. [Sec. III.A, Fig. 7] The claim of low-temperature operation down to ~10 K is supported by spin-lock readout at 10 K, but the paper does not demonstrate optical DNP at 10 K. All DNP demonstrations shown appear to be at RT and 100 K (Figs. 6 and 8). The text in Sec. III says experiments were 'conducted under cryogenic conditions' without specifying which temperature was used for hyperpolarization. If DNP at 10 K has not been performed, the abstract's '10K to 300K' range for optical DNP studies is not demonstrated. Please clarify the temperature at which hyperpolarization was achieved in each experiment, and, if 10 K DNP has not yet been demonstrated, state this explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1] The caption and figure contain placeholder text 'insert CAD here' and 'insert dewar spigot here' that must be replaced with the actual rendering and photograph before submission.
  2. [Sec. III.A and Fig. 6B caption] The text states the curve in Fig. 6B 'comprises over 10M points', while the figure caption reports '>3M points'; these numbers should be reconciled.
  3. [Sec. III.C] The paper reports T1 values of 386 s and 3094 s at 27 mT and 9.4 T, respectively, but does not specify the fit function or the number of points used to extract these lifetimes; please include this information.
  4. [General] Several references are self-citations to the same group (e.g., Refs. [14, 25, 33, 45, 47]). While this is not inappropriate for an instrument built on prior work, the authors may wish to cite independent implementations of cryogenic shuttling or optical DNP where possible.
  5. [Sec. II.A] The phrase 'This reasoning aligns with findings in Ref. [31]' would be clearer if the relevant relaxation mechanism (two-electron spin flip processes) were briefly described in the text rather than only referenced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Instrument paper with no circular derivation; measured outputs support the capability claims.

full rationale

The paper is an instrumentation demonstration, not a derivation. Central claims (10 mT–9.4 T, 10 K–300 K, continuous cryogen delivery, >10M RF pulses) are backed by measured outputs—FID and pulsed spin-lock lifetimes (T2'=93.5 s vs T2*=1.1 ms), >100-fold SNR gain, and T1 values 386 s (27 mT) and 3094 s (9.4 T) at 100 K—not by fitted parameters relabeled as predictions. The slow-shuttling assumption in Sec. II.A is supported by those in-paper T1 data and by independent literature; the text explicitly acknowledges the 'practical boundary' on suitable materials, so it is a scope limitation rather than a circularity. Self-citations (Refs. 14, 25, 31, 33, 40, 45, 47) provide protocol context and secondary interpretation (e.g., spin-texture discussion is deferred to Ref. [47]), but none carries the central instrument claim. No equation reduces to an input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an instrument demonstration; it rests on standard NMR/DNP physics and on engineering assumptions about thermal management, eddy currents, and RF shielding. No free parameters are fitted. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Nuclear spin T1 relaxation times are long at cryogenic temperatures and high fields, and the low-field (<1 T) region is traversed in <3 s, so the ~91 s total shuttling time does not destroy hyperpolarization.
    Stated in Sec. II.A as the justification for accepting slow shuttling; this is an assumption about the target samples' relaxation behavior, demonstrated only for 13C in diamond.
  • domain assumption The stainless steel cryostat body provides sufficient RF shielding for high-SNR NMR measurements.
    Sec. II.D states the cryostat body acts as the RF shield with copper fingers contacting the walls; shielding effectiveness is assumed and not quantified.
  • domain assumption The spring-loaded balancer and high-torque gearbox can compensate eddy-current forces during shuttling, keeping the cryostat aligned within >0.5 degrees.
    Sec. II.A describes the mechanical compensation strategy; the alignment tolerance is stated as a design requirement, not a measured verification.
  • domain assumption Operating the sample chamber in a helium gas environment prevents RF arcing at cryogenic temperatures, consistent with Paschen's law.
    Sec. II.D cites Paschen's law to justify the helium environment; the practical absence of arcing is reported but not systematically characterized.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cryogenic field-cycling instrument for optical NMR hyperpolarization studies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JGBSGT67

@misc{pith2026241216471,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cryogenic field-cycling instrument for optical NMR hyperpolarization studies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JGBSGT67}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16471}
}
read the original abstract

Optical dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) offers an attractive approach to enhancing the sensitivity of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Efficient, optically-generated electron polarization can be leveraged to operate across a broad range of temperatures and magnetic fields, making it particularly appealing for applications requiring high DNP efficiency or spatial resolution. While a large class of systems hold promise for optical DNP, many candidates display both variable electron polarizability and electron and nuclear T1 relaxation times as functions of magnetic field and temperature. This necessitates tools capable of studying DNP under diverse experimental conditions. To address this, we introduce a cryogenic field cycling instrument that facilitates optical DNP studies across a wide range of magnetic fields (10mT to 9.4T) and temperatures (10K to 300K). Continuous cryogen replenishment enables sustained, long-term operation. Additionally, the system supports the ability to manipulate and probe hyperpolarized nuclear spins via pulse sequences involving millions of RF pulses. We describe innovations in the device design and demonstrate its operation on a model system of 13C nuclear spins in diamond polarized through optically pumped nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers. We anticipate the use of the instrument for a broad range of optical DNP systems and studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16471 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of instrument. (A) CAD rendering illustrates the instrument, comprising a 9.4 T high-field NMR magnet and a 4K-compatible cryostat for sample and NMR probe housing ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Field map indicating variation of the magnetic field with vertical position along the central axis of the magnet. Sweet spot of the magnet is evident at the high-field plateau region (9.4 T). For the experiments on hyperpolarizing 13C nuclei in diamond, the DNP and readout fields are marked by dashed line. Region where two P1 center-mediated nuclear spin flip relaxation process is active, up to 100mT, is shaded in p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A shows the assembled system. On top is the Stinger cryocooler which is mounted to an aluminum extrusion (80/20) frame ≈7 ft off the ground so that the transfer line can reach the cryostat during shuttling. The GM refrigeration cycle is powered by pre-cooled, high-pressure helium gas supplied by the helium compressor (Sumitomo, F-70) located at the base of the setup. Vacuum is pulled on the vacuum jacket of the cryo… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DNP/NMR Probe. (A) CAD rendering illustrates probe de￾sign and corresponding figure insets. (B) Photograph of probe with length 39in. from the top of the cap to the bottom of the last support. Probe fits snugly into cryostat, which acts as RF shield during NMR measurem…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Control and synchronization of instrument. (Yellow) Syn￾chronization: TTL triggers output by the Swabian pattern generator synchronize the timing of the four main components of the setup: laser, MW, shuttling, and RF. (Green) Optics: Laser beam is directed through the …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Probing hyperpolarized 13C nuclei at 100K. (A) FID and (B) pulsed spinlock (SL) traces for 13C nuclei hyperpolarized via optical DNP at 100K. (i) Inset: Experimental scheme for DNP followed by an FID readout. Pulsed spin-lock readout involves a pulse train (B(i)) with …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SL measurements at different temperatures. Three SL mea￾surements taken at RT, 100K, and 10K. Data at 100K and 10K is taken over a 5min. period involving >4M pulses. All data is smoothed using a moving boxcar average. Dashed line marks 1/𝑒 intercept. Data reveals a sig…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Field-cycling relaxometry with hyperpolarized nuclei. (i) Experiment schematic: Spins are allowed to relax at an intermediate field 𝐵int for a period 𝑡int, followed by high field (9.4 T) readout via spin lock. Representative 𝑇1 relaxation traces at 100K measured at low…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: In these experiments, pulsed spin-lock measurements similar to those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    D. W. Laorenza, A. Kairalapova, S. L. Bayliss, T. Goldzak, S. M. Greene, L. R. Weiss, P. Deb, P. J. Mintun, K. A. Collins, D. D. Awschalom, et al., Tunable cr4+ molecular color centers, Journal of the American Chemical Society 143, 21350 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [47]

    A. Ajoy, R. Nazaryan, K. Liu, X. Lv, B. Safvati, G. Wang, E. Druga, J. A. Reimer, D. Suter, C. Ramanathan, C. A. Meriles, and A. Pines, Enhanced dynamic nuclear polarization via swept microwave fre- quency combs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 10576 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    Cryogen delivery to the cryostat is achieved through a horizontal plunging spigot (as shown zoomed in Fig

    Approach I: Cryogen Delivery System for 77K to Room Temperature We now describe Approach I that allows operating tempera- ture from 77K-RT. Cryogen delivery to the cryostat is achieved through a horizontal plunging spigot (as shown zoomed in Fig. 1D). The cryostat’s outer layer is maintained under vacuum by a dual pump system, comprising a Pfeiffer ONF 01...

    work page

  4. [2]

    pre-thermalize

    Approach II: Closed-Cycle Liquid Helium (LHe) System for Low Temperatures Approach II enables access to temperatures reliably down to ∼10K using a closed-cycle liquid helium (LHe) system (Cold- Edge Stinger). This system’s primary advantage lies in LHe recovery, which eliminates the need to periodically refill cryo- gen. This removes an otherwise prohibit...

    work page

  5. [3]

    Slichter and W

    C. Slichter and W. C. Holton, Adiabatic demagnetization in a rotating reference system, Physical Review122, 1701 (1961)

    work page 1961

  6. [4]

    Goldman, Spin Temperature and NMR in Solids

    M. Goldman, Spin Temperature and NMR in Solids. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1970)

    work page 1970

  7. [5]

    T. Maly, G. T. Debelouchina, V. S. Bajaj, K.-N. Hu, C.-G. Joo, M. L. MakJurkauskas, J. R. Sirigiri, P. C. A. van der Wel, J. Herzfeld, R. J. Temkin, and R. G. Griffin, Dynamic nuclear po- larization at high magnetic fields, The Journal of Chemical Physics 128, 052211 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [6]

    C. P. Jaroniec, C. E. MacPhee, V. S. Bajaj, M. T. McMahon, C. M. Dobson, and R. G. Griffin, High-resolution molecular structure of a peptide in an amyloid fibril determined by magic angle spin- ning nmr spectroscopy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 711 (2004)

    work page 2004

Show all 57 references
  1. [7]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of modern physics89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  2. [8]

    Sahin, H

    O. Sahin, H. A. Asadi, P. Schindler, A. Pillai, E. Sanchez, M. Markham, M. Elo, M. McAllister, E. Druga, C. Flecken- stein, M. Bukov, and A. Ajoy, Continuously tracked, stable, large excursion trajectories of dipolar coupled nuclear spins (2022), arXiv:2206.14945 [quant-ph]

    2022

  3. [9]

    J. A. Reimer, Nuclear hyperpolarization in solids and the prospects for nuclear spintronics, Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance37, 3 (2010)

    2010

  4. [10]

    Henstra, P

    A. Henstra, P. Dirksen, J. Schmidt, and W. Wenckebach, Nuclear spin orientation via electron spin locking (novel), J. Mag. Res.77, 389 (1988)

    1988

  5. [11]

    Tycko, Optical pumping of dipolar order in a coupled nuclear spin system., Molecular Physics 95, 1169 (1998)

    R. Tycko, Optical pumping of dipolar order in a coupled nuclear spin system., Molecular Physics 95, 1169 (1998)

    1998

  6. [12]

    London, J

    P. London, J. Scheuer, J.-M. Cai, I. Schwarz, A. Retzker, M. Plenio, M. Katagiri, T. Teraji, S. Koizumi, J. Isoya, et al., Detecting and polarizing nuclear spins with double resonance on a single electron spin, Physical review letters 111, 067601 (2013)

    2013

  7. [13]

    Sarkar, B

    A. Sarkar, B. Blankenship, E. Druga, A. Pillai, R. Nirodi, S. Singh, A. Oddo, P. Reshetikhin, and A. Ajoy, Rapidly enhanced spin- polarization injection in an optically pumped spin ratchet, Physical Review Applied 18, 034079 (2022)

    2022

  8. [14]

    Fischer, C

    R. Fischer, C. O. Bretschneider, P. London, D. Budker, D. Ger- shoni, and L. Frydman, Bulk nuclear polarization enhanced at room temperature by optical pumping, Physical review letters111, 057601 (2013)

    2013

  9. [15]

    G. A. ´Alvarez, C. O. Bretschneider, R. Fischer, P. London, H. Kanda, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, D. Gershoni, and L. Frydman, Local and bulk 13c hyperpolarization in nitrogen-vacancy-centred dia- monds at variable fields and orientations, Nature communications 6 (2015)

    2015

  10. [16]

    A. Ajoy, K. Liu, R. Nazaryan, X. Lv, P. R. Zangara, B. Safvati, G. Wang, D. Arnold, G. Li, A. Lin,et al., Orientation-independent room temperature optical 13c hyperpolarization in powdered dia- mond, Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5492 (2018)

    2018

  11. [17]

    Tateishi, M

    K. Tateishi, M. Negoro, S. Nishida, A. Kagawa, Y. Morita, and M. Kitagawa, Room temperature hyperpolarization of nuclear spins in bulk, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 7527 (2014)

    2014

  12. [18]

    Hautle and W

    P. Hautle and W. T. Wenckebach, Creating high, portable proton polarization with photo-excited triplet dnp, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open 20, 100159 (2024)

    2024

  13. [19]

    Singh, N

    H. Singh, N. D’Souza, K. Zhong, E. Druga, J. Oshiro, B. Blanken- ship, J. A. Reimer, J. D. Breeze, and A. Ajoy, Room-temperature quantum sensing with photoexcited triplet electrons in organic crystals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13898 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [20]

    A. Mena, S. K. Mann, A. Cowley-Semple, E. Bryan, S. Heutz, D. R. McCamey, M. Attwood, and S. L. Bayliss, Room-temperature optically detected coherent control of molecular spins, Physical review letters 133, 120801 (2024)

    2024

  15. [21]

    Hamachi, K

    T. Hamachi, K. Nishimura, H. Kouno, Y. Kawashima, K. Tateishi, T. Uesaka, N. Kimizuka, and N. Yanai, Porphyrins as versa- tile, aggregation-tolerant, and biocompatible polarizing agents for triplet dynamic nuclear polarization of biomolecules, The Journal of Physical Chemistry...

    2021

  16. [22]

    Sakamoto, T

    K. Sakamoto, T. Hamachi, K. Miyokawa, K. Tateishi, T. Uesaka, Y. Kurashige, and N. Yanai, Polarizing agents beyond pentacene for efficient triplet dynamic nuclear polarization in glass matrices, (2023)

    2023

  17. [23]

    De Biasi, M

    F. De Biasi, M. A. Hope, C. E. Avalos, G. Karthikeyan, G. Casano, A. Mishra, S. Badoni, G. Stevanato, D. J. Kubicki, J. Milani,et al., Optically enhanced solid-state 1h nmr spectroscopy, Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, 14874 (2023)

    2023

  18. [24]

    Bayliss, D

    S. Bayliss, D. Laorenza, P. Mintun, B. Kovos, D. Freedman, and D. Awschalom, Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum information processing, Science 370, 1309 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    J. M. Zadrozny, A. T. Gallagher, T. D. Harris, and D. E. Freedman, A porous array of clock qubits, Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, 7089 (2017)

    2017

  20. [27]

    A. Ajoy, X. Lv, E. Druga, K. Liu, B. Safvati, A. Morabe, M. Fenton, R. Nazaryan, S. Patel, T. F. Sjolander, J. A. Reimer, D. Sakellariou, C. A. Meriles, and A. Pines, Wide dynamic range magnetic field cycler: Harnessing quantum control at low and high fields, Review of Scienti...

    2019

  21. [28]

    A. S. Kiryutin, A. N. Pravdivtsev, K. L. Ivanov, Y. A. Grishin, H.- M. Vieth, and A. V. Yurkovskaya, A fast field-cycling device for high-resolution nmr: Design and application to spin relaxation and hyperpolarization experiments, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 263, 79 (2016)

    2016

  22. [29]

    I. V. Zhukov, A. S. Kiryutin, A. V. Yurkovskaya, Y. A. Grishin, H.-M. Vieth, and K. L. Ivanov, Field-cycling nmr experiments in an ultra-wide magnetic field range: relaxation and coherent polarization transfer, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 20, 12396 (2018). 11

    2018

  23. [30]

    Charlier, S

    C. Charlier, S. N. Khan, T. Marquardsen, P. Pelupessy, V. Reiss, D. Sakellariou, G. Bodenhausen, F. Engelke, and F. Ferrage, Nanosecond time scale motions in proteins revealed by high- resolution nmr relaxometry, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 18665 (2013)

    2013

  24. [31]

    A. M. Hall, T. A. Cartlidge, and G. Pileio, A temperature- controlled sample shuttle for field-cycling nmr, Journal of Mag- netic Resonance 317, 106778 (2020)

    2020

  25. [32]

    M. S. Conradi and A. P. Zens, Rf shielding and eddy currents in nmr probes, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 305, 180 (2019)

    2019

  26. [33]

    A. Ajoy, B. Safvati, R. Nazaryan, J. Oon, B. Han, P. Raghavan, R. Nirodi, A. Aguilar, K. Liu, X. Cai,et al., Hyperpolarized relax- ometry based nuclear t 1 noise spectroscopy in diamond, Nature communications 10, 1 (2019)

    2019

  27. [34]

    P. R. Zangara, S. Dhomkar, A. Ajoy, K. Liu, R. Nazaryan, D. Pagliero, D. Suter, J. A. Reimer, A. Pines, and C. A. Mer- iles, Dynamics of frequency-swept nuclear spin optical pumping in powdered diamond at low magnetic fields, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 2...

    2019

  28. [35]

    galton board

    A. Pillai, M. Elanchezhian, T. Virtanen, S. Conti, and A. Ajoy, Electron-to-nuclear spectral mapping via “galton board” dynamic nuclear polarization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05742

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    Henstra, T

    A. Henstra, T. S. Lin, J. Schmidt, and W. T. Wenckebach, High dy- namic nuclear polarization at room temperature, Chemical Physics Letters 165, 6 (1990)

    1990

  30. [37]

    J. P. King, P. J. Coles, and J. A. Reimer, Optical polarization of c 13 nuclei in diamond through nitrogen vacancy centers, Physical Review B 81, 073201 (2010)

    2010

  31. [38]

    M. G. Concilio, M. Soundararajan, L. Frydman, and I. Kuprov, High-field solution state dnp using cross-correlations, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 326, 106940 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    Kuprov, L

    I. Kuprov, L. Frydman, et al., J-driven dynamic nuclear polariza- tion for sensitizing high field solution state nmr, Physical Chem- istry Chemical Physics 24, 2118 (2022)

    2022

  33. [40]

    Babich and T

    L. Babich and T. V. Lo ≪ˆeko, Generalized paschen ’ ¨Aˆos law for overvoltage conditions, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science44, 3243 (2016)

    2016

  34. [41]

    Tagami, R

    K. Tagami, R. Thicklin, S. Jain, A. Equbal, M. Li, T. Zens, A. Siaw, and S. Han, Design of a cryogen-free high field dual epr and dnp probe, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 347, 107351 (2023)

    2023

  35. [42]

    Beatrez, O

    W. Beatrez, O. Janes, A. Akkiraju, A. Pillai, A. Oddo, P. Reshetikhin, E. Druga, M. McAllister, M. Elo, B. Gilbert, D. Suter, and A. Ajoy, Floquet prethermalization with lifetime exceeding 90 s in a bulk hyperpolarized solid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 170603 (2021)

    2021

  36. [43]

    Y.-Q. Song, L. Venkataramanan, and L. Burcaw, Determining the resolution of laplace inversion spectrum, The Journal of chemical physics 122 (2005)

    2005

  37. [44]

    K. A. Harkins, C. Selco, C. Bengs, D. Marchiori, L. J. I. Moon, Z.- R. Zhang, A. Yang, A. Singh, E. Druga, Y.-Q. Song,et al., Anoma- lously extended floquet prethermal lifetimes and applications to long-time quantum sensing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09028 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Jarmola, V

    A. Jarmola, V. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Bud- ker, Temperature-and magnetic-field-dependent longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond, Physical review letters 108, 197601 (2012)

    2012

  39. [46]

    Takahashi, R

    S. Takahashi, R. Hanson, J. van Tol, M. S. Sherwin, and D. D. Awschalom, Quenching spin decoherence in diamond through spin bath polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 047601 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, A. Waxman, L.- S. Bouchard, and D. Budker, Temperature dependence of the nitrogen-vacancy magnetic resonance in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070801 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    Harkins, C

    K. Harkins, C. Fleckenstein, N. D’Souza, P. M. Schindler, D. Mar- chiori, C. Artiaco, Q. Reynard-Feytis, U. Basumallick, W. Beatrez, A. Pillai, et al., Nanoscale engineering and dynamical stabiliza- tion of mesoscopic spin textures, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05635 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. G. Redfield, Shuttling device for high-resolution measurements of relaxation and related phenomena in solution at low field, using a shared commercial 500 mhz nmr instrument, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 41, 753 (2003)

    2003

  43. [51]

    Grosse, F

    S. Grosse, F. Gubaydullin, H. Scheelken, H. M. Vieth, and A. Yurkovskaya, Field cycling by fast nmr probe transfer: De- sign and application in field-dependent cidnp experiments, Applied Magnetic Resonance 17, 211 (1999)

    1999

  44. [52]

    S. F. Cousin, C. Charlier, P. Kadeˇr´avek, T. Marquardsen, J.-M. Ty- burn, P.-A. Bovier, S. Ulzega, T. Speck, D. Wilhelm, F. Engelke, et al., High-resolution two-field nuclear magnetic resonance spec- troscopy, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 33187 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    C.-Y. Chou, M. Chu, C.-F. Chang, and T.-h. Huang, A compact high-speed mechanical sample shuttle for field-dependent high- resolution solution nmr, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 214, 302 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    C.-Y. Chou, M. Chu, C.-F. Chang, T. Yu, T.-h. Huang, and D. Sakel- lariou, High sensitivity high-resolution full range relaxometry us- ing a fast mechanical sample shuttling device and a cryo-probe, Journal of biomolecular NMR 66, 187 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Kimmich and E

    R. Kimmich and E. Anoardo, Field-cycling nmr relaxometry, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy 44, 257 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    R. M. Steele, J.-P. Korb, G. Ferrante, and S. Bubici, New ap- plications and perspectives of fast field cycling nmr relaxometry, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 54, 502 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Kalendra, J

    V. Kalendra, J. Tur ˇcak, G. Usevi ˇcius, H. Karas, M. H¨ ulsmann, A. Godt, G. Jeschke, J. Banys, J. J. Morton, and M. ˇSim˙enas, Q- band epr cryoprobe, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 356, 107573 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.