Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Gravitational Foundations and Exact Solutions in $n$-Dimensional Fractional Cosmology

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single time-dependent fractional kernel inserted into a generalized scalar-tensor action yields exact cosmological solutions that pass through inflation, radiation, matter, and late acceleration without a cosmological constant or an ad ho

desk verdict Genuine exact solutions in fractional Sáez–Ballester cosmology, but the three-equation independence claim and the Noether/Bianchi consistency claims overreach; the §VI diffeomorphism contradiction is real. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.11583 v2 pith:JLJ7IRWX submitted 2025-12-12 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

S. M. M. Rasouli , J. Marto , D. Oliveira , P. Moniz This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO
keywords FractionalCosmologySáez–BallestertheoryFLRWExtendedtheoriesofgravityDynamicalsystemNonlocalityandmemoryeffectNoethertheoremExactsolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that replacing the time measure in a generalized Sáez–Ballester scalar-tensor action with a Riemann–Liouville-type kernel changes the structure of the field equations: three unknowns (H, ρφ, pφ) can be solved from three independent equations, so the scalar potential emerges from the dynamics instead of being imposed by hand. It derives exact solutions for a flat FLRW universe in n dimensions and claims that, for appropriate values of the fractional parameter and one integration constant, the effective equation of state runs through early inflation, radiation domination, matter domination, and late-time acceleration. The same fractional structure is argued to satisfy Bianchi identities and Noether's second theorem, with the total effective energy-momentum tensor conserved while energy is exchanged between the scalar and kernel sectors. If right, this is a closed, analytic, parameter-controlled cosmology that reproduces the standard sequence of cosmic eras without dark energy or exotic fluids.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the kernel-weighted action S(α)_SB = (1/Γ(α)) ∫ d^n x √−g ξ(t) L_SB with ξ(t) = (t̄ − t')^{α−1}, equivalent to a Riemann–Liouville fractional time integral applied to the whole Sáez–Ballester Lagrangian. Varying it produces a fractional-sector energy-momentum tensor T^{(f)}_{μν} = (1/(κ_n ξ))(∇_μ∇_ν ξ − ∇²ξ), whose FLRW specialization gives the 1/t and 1/t² terms in the Friedmann equations. The exact solution itself is organized around h(t) = (t^A − C)/(t^A + C), with A = √((α−3)² n² + 2(3α−5)n + 1), which solves a Riccati-type equation for H(t); this h(t) is what lets the potential be reconstructed rather than assumed.

What would settle it

Compute the Jacobian determinant (or numerical rank) of the three fractional equations — (14), (15), and either (16) or (21) — treated as equations for H, ρφ, pφ at generic α, n, t; if the rank drops below 3, the central independence claim fails. A second check: search the admissible parameter space (α, n, C) for a point where V(t) from Eq. (29) vanishes or where ρ_eff is negative during the purported radiation/matter phases; either would contradict the paper's claim that all epochs emerge without ad hoc input.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that fractionalization via a time-dependent kernel changes the counting of independent equations. In the standard Sáez–Ballester model only two of the four field equations are independent, so a potential must be guessed; in the fractional version the kernel adds explicit 1/t and 1/t² terms that make three equations independent, allowing H(t), ρφ(t) and pφ(t) to be determined exactly without specifying V(φ). The resulting closed-form solution contains only α, n and one integration constant C, and its effective equation of state runs through initial acceleration, radiation-like, matter-like, and late accelerated phases, while the scalar potent

Load-bearing premise

The assertion that the fractional field equations contain three independent equations for the three unknowns H, ρφ, pφ is stated without proof; if one of the Friedmann equations is actually implied by the others for generic α, the exact solution is a specially selected trajectory rather than the general no-ad-hoc-potential solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the system is genuinely three-dimensional for generic α, the model supplies exact, parameter-controlled solutions for the whole cosmic history with no potential input — a new way to generate scalar-field cosmologies.
  • The standard α = 1 model is recovered as a limit, so the fractional framework doubles as a solution-generating device for standard scalar field cosmology: it produces a particular potential that would be nearly impossible to guess by hand.
  • First-order perturbation theory is consistent with the background: the fractional Mukhanov–Sasaki equation with c_s² = 1 governs curvature perturbations, meaning scalar modes propagate at the speed of light and the spectral index will differ from the standard single-field prediction through the modified z² = a² Q_s.
  • Energy conservation is preserved only for the total effective sector; the scalar field continuously exchanges energy with the kernel whenever ξ̇ ≠ 0, which is a distinctive observational signature distinguishing this class from minimally coupled scalar field models.
  • Because V(t) never vanishes for admissible parameters, the framework cannot describe a potential-free (kinetic-dominated) phase, and bounce solutions are excluded in the present single-fluid setup — both are concrete, checkable predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the independence count is confirmed, an immediate testable extension is to convert the reconstructed V(t) into V(φ) and compare its shape with standard inflation/dark-energy potentials (e.g., m²φ², λφ⁴, plateau forms); the paper leaves this reconstruction open.
  • The fractional sector's effective density scales like H/t, which behaves as a time-dependent dark-radiation-like component; fitting α, C, n to supernova or CMB data could constrain the model, but the paper does not perform that quantitative fit.
  • The modified Mukhanov–Sasaki variable implies a calculable tilt and amplitude for the primordial spectrum; deriving n_s and r for the inflationary branch would let the model be tested against forthcoming CMB polarization data.
  • Because the kernel breaks time reparametrization invariance, the model effectively selects a preferred foliation; comparing its predictions in different time gauges would clarify whether the claimed gauge-independence of the perturbation results survives beyond Newtonian gauge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a fractional generalization of Sáez–Ballester scalar-tensor cosmology in n dimensions by inserting a Riemann–Liouville-type time kernel into the action. It derives the background field equations (Eqs. (14)–(16)), a generalized continuity equation (Eq. (21)), and a first-order ODE for H (Eq. (22)), whose exact solution is given in Eqs. (23)–(30), together with the associated a(t), ρφ(t), pφ(t), V(t), and kinetic-term expressions. The paper then constructs two dynamical-systems formulations, presents qualitative plots of the effective equation-of-state and deceleration parameters, and derives first-order scalar perturbation equations, including a fractional Mukhanov–Sasaki equation. It claims that the time-dependent kernel preserves diffeomorphism invariance and that the Bianchi identities and Noether’s second theorem remain applicable, so that the effective energy–momentum tensor is conserved.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a rare example of a fractional cosmological model with explicit exact background solutions and a unified, parameter-controlled description of early inflation, radiation, matter domination, and late acceleration without an ad hoc scalar potential. The explicit formulas (23)–(30), the transparent α=1 reduction, and the first-order perturbation framework are useful and nontrivial contributions. However, the significance is currently limited by unresolved issues: the claimed independence of the field equations is not proven; the treatment of time reparametrization symmetry is internally contradictory, which undermines the Bianchi/Noether consistency claims; and the advertised comparison with observational data is absent. These are not cosmetic deficiencies but affect the paper’s central claims of consistency and observational viability.

major comments (4)
  1. [§VI and §V D] The treatment of time reparametrization invariance is self-contradictory. §VI states that due to the time-dependent kernel, the field equations contain time-dependent terms that clearly break time-reparametrization symmetry, and that 'the freedom to reparametrize time is lost'; item (ii) of the same section then states that 'the action remains diffeomorphism invariant, and therefore the second Noether theorem can still be applied.' For a fixed, non-dynamical ξ(t) both cannot hold. Under t→t+ε(t) with δξ=0, the action changes by a term proportional to ˙ξ ε; if ξ is instead allowed to transform as a scalar, then the background ξ(t) is not fixed and an equation of motion for ξ is missing. Consequently, the Noether identities (82)–(87), the exchange law (83), and the conservation law (85) do not follow from diffeomorphism invariance. Because time reparametrizations are broken, the Newtonian
  2. [§III A; Eqs. (14)–(22)] The central route to exact solutions rests on the assertion in §III A that the fractional system has 'three independent equations for three unknowns.' This is stated without proof. No constraint or Frobenius analysis is provided, and the assertion is in tension with §V D, where the effective EMT is claimed to be conserved as a consequence of a Bianchi identity; if such an identity holds, one of the Friedmann equations should be redundant once the scalar equation is satisfied. A concrete test would be to compute the rank of the system (14)–(16) and to verify that the exact solution (23)–(30) does not simply use one equation as a definition of V or φ. Without this, the 'no-ad-hoc-potential' exact solution may be a specially selected trajectory rather than the general solution, and the claimed elimination of supplementary assumptions is not established.
  3. [Abstract; §IV C and Figs. 1–3] The abstract and §VI state that the model's predictions are compared with observational data and that the solutions can be consistent with observations. The body contains only qualitative plots for hand-picked parameter values: Fig. 1 uses α=0.35, 0.45, 0.55 with C=-475; Fig. 2 uses α=1.35, 1.45, 1.65 and C=5, 15, 25; Fig. 3 varies n. No observational dataset, likelihood, parameter constraint, or quantitative comparison appears anywhere in §IV C or elsewhere. The phase sequence (early inflation, radiation, matter, late acceleration) is therefore a demonstration that such epochs can be mimicked for chosen parameters, not a comparison with data. Either add a real data comparison (e.g., H(z) or distance moduli, with a scan over α and C) or remove the observational claims from the abstract and conclusions.
  4. [§III B, Eqs. (29)–(30); §IV A] The exact solution is not a complete scalar-field solution. Equations (29) and (30) give V(t) and the combination ωφ^r ˙φ² as functions of t, but φ(t) itself is never integrated. For general r and ω, the paper does not show that φ(t) can be obtained in closed form, and Section IV A admits that the functional dependence V(φ) is 'possibly unattainable.' This makes the comparison with standard potentials (Sec. IV A) and the reduction to ordinary single-field inflation (Sec. V C) formal rather than explicit. The special case r=0, ω=1/2 should be worked out; for general r, the status of the solution as an exact scalar-field configuration should be stated precisely.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§II, Eq. (12)] The substitution t'− ¯t ≡ t makes t≤0 on the integration domain as written, which is inconsistent with the later use of t>0 and with fractional powers t^A. Please define t unambiguously (likely t = ¯t−t').
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption reads 'black curves' as 'back curves'; typographical correction needed.
  3. [§I] The phrase 'second Noether theorem []' contains an empty bracket; the reference should be supplied.
  4. [Eqs. (25)–(26)] Equation numbering skips (26), leaving a blank line. Renumber or remove.
  5. [Eqs. (23)–(24)] The constant C in h(t)=(t^A−C)/(t^A+C) carries dimensions of t^A. The text never explains how C is made dimensionless in the figures; a clear scaling convention is needed.
  6. [§VI] The statement that the model is 'expected to be ghost-free' is given without a proof from the quadratic action; either provide the positivity conditions or label it as heuristic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exact solutions are derived from the field equations, and the parameter-dependent phase illustrations are not disguised fits.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation—the exact solution (23)–(30)—is obtained by combining the fractional Friedmann, Raychaudhuri, and generalized continuity equations (14), (15), and (21) into the Riccati-type equation (22) for H(t). This is an explicit algebraic elimination of ρ_φ and p_φ; the scalar potential V(t) is then reconstructed from the same equations, not assumed in advance. The paper even checks the fractional Klein–Gordon equation (31) with the resulting expressions, so the solution is not merely a restatement of an input potential. The effective energy–momentum tensor and the effective equation of state w_eff are bookkeeping definitions that rewrite the modified equations in standard Friedmann form; the continuity equation (47) is a consequence of those definitions and the background equations, not an independently fitted prediction. The phase sequence shown in Figure 1 does depend on the chosen values of α and C, and the phrase that the phases 'naturally emerge' is rhetorical overreach; however, choosing integration constants and model parameters to exhibit a desired cosmology is standard model-building, not a circular derivation. The paper also contains a genuine consistency tension in Section VI: it first states that the time-dependent kernel breaks time-reparametrization symmetry and later asserts that 'the action remains diffeomorphism invariant, and therefore the second Noether theorem can still be applied.' That is a correctness risk for the Noether/Bianchi claims, but it is not a circularity: the exact background solution and the phase analysis do not reduce to those Noether identities. The self-citations, including [98] and [99], are not load-bearing for the main exact-solution derivation. Overall, no step in the claimed derivation is equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model is built on the kernel-weighting fractionalization technique, which is an externally imposed choice. The central exact-solution program depends on the asserted independence of three equations, on treating ξ(t) as external yet diffeomorphism-compatible, and on interpreting V(t) as a legitimate V(ϕ). These are the main items the reader must accept without independent derivation.

free parameters (4)
  • fractional parameter α = illustrative values: 0.35, 0.45, 0.55, 1.35, 1.45, 1.65 (Figures 1–2)
    Appears in the kernel ξ∝(t̄−t')^{α−1} and in all exact solutions; no independent measurement or fit is provided, and the epoch sequence depends on it.
  • integration constant C = e.g., C=-475 in Figure 1; C=5, 15, 25 in Figure 2
    Arises from solving the first-order ODE (22); controls the timing and sharpness of transitions between cosmological eras. It is chosen by hand in the numerical illustrations.
  • scale-factor integration constant a_i = not specified; normalized through H(t0)
    Overall amplitude of a(t) in equation (25); does not affect the qualitative evolution but is an undetermined integration constant.
  • Sáez–Ballester kinetic parameters r and ω = not fixed
    Enter through J(ϕ)=2ωϕ^r in the action (1) and the Klein–Gordon equation (16). The Hubble solution does not depend on them, but reconstructing ϕ(t) and V(ϕ) would require choosing them; no values are given.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Euler–Lagrange equations with second-order derivatives, equation (13), are the correct variational equations for the Lagrangian containing ξ(t) and higher derivatives.
    Used in Section II to derive the fractional field equations (14)–(16).
  • domain assumption The flat FLRW metric with K=0 and N=1 can be imposed after deriving the action-based field equations.
    Section II, after equation (13); restricts the analysis to spatially flat, synchronous-like coordinates.
  • domain assumption Equations (14), (15) and (21) are three independent equations for H, ρ and p.
    Section III A asserts this independence without proof; the central no-ad-hoc-potential solution depends on this count. It may be incompatible with the Bianchi/Noether conservation statements in Section V D.
  • ad hoc to paper The kernel ξ(t) can be treated as a non-dynamical external field while the action retains diffeomorphism invariance and Noether's second theorem remains applicable.
    Section II introduces ξ(t) as a fixed kernel; Section V D applies Noether's second theorem; Section VI simultaneously says time reparametrization is broken. The compatibility of these assumptions is not resolved.
  • domain assumption The time-dependent V(t) derived in equation (29) corresponds to a legitimate scalar potential V(ϕ) for the action.
    Only V(t) is constructed in Section III B; the functional form V(ϕ) is not provided and the authors admit in Section IV A that expressing the potential in terms of ϕ is highly non-trivial.
invented entities (1)
  • Fractional-sector stress-energy tensor T^(f)_μν
    purpose: To absorb the contribution of the kernel ξ(t) so that the field equations take Einstein-like form and an effective energy-momentum conservation statement can be made.
    Defined in equation (5) as a geometric expression in derivatives of ξ, and used in equations (41)–(43) as a 'fractional sector' fluid. It is a bookkeeping construct with no independent falsifiable signature outside the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Foundations and Exact Solutions in $n$-Dimensional Fractional Cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JLJ7IRWX

@misc{pith2026251211583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Foundations and Exact Solutions in $n$-Dimensional Fractional Cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JLJ7IRWX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.11583}
}
abstract

Three theoretically plausible techniques to developing a fractional scalar field cosmological model are pointed in this paper; the time-dependent kernel weighted action being then selected. Upon this choice, we proceed to establish (i) a time weighted action associated with the generalized scalar field cosmology; and (ii) a fractional cosmological model in $n$ dimensions considering the FLRW metric and a generalized version of the S\'{a}ez-Ballester (SB) theory. Our study focuses on the following purposes. Firstly, to investigate the fundamental gravitational structural features of the model, we analyze the dynamical behavior of the field equations, the fulfillment of the Bianchi identities, the associated conservation laws, and the application of the second Noether theorem at the background and first-order perturbation levels. Moreover, the model's distinguishing characteristics and theoretical differences from the corresponding standard scenarios are also investigated. Secondly, we aim to obtain exact analytical solutions and analyze the time evolution of key cosmological quantities, considering the fractional parameter effects. Furthermore, the model's predictions are compared with those of the corresponding standard models. Lastly, we propose new ideas to further generalize our model, with a focus on constructing an effective potential and investigating the conditions under which bounce solutions may emerge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11583 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The time behavior of effective EoS parameter (Left panel) and the deceleration parameter (right panel) for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The left panel: The time behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The time behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergent $\Lambda$CDM cosmology from a measure-induced deformation of the Newtonian action

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Deforming the Newtonian action with a fractional time kernel generates effective ΛCDM cosmology, including accelerated expansion from a single potential when α is near 1.

  2. Evolution of density perturbations in fractional cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the fractional model, matter density perturbations grow as t^{p±(α)} and matching the late-time growth to σ8 yields α≲1.07.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Salgado, M

    P. Salgado, M. Cataldo, and Sergio del Campo. Higher dimensional gravity invariant under the Poincare group.Phys. Rev. D, 66:024013, 2002

    2002

  2. [2]

    Overduin, and Paul S

    Tomas Liko, James M. Overduin, and Paul S. Wesson. Astrophysical implications of higher dimensional gravity.Space Sci. Rev., 110:337–357, 2004

    2004

  3. [3]

    Seyed M. M. Rasouli. Kasner Solution in Brans–Dicke Theory and Its Corresponding Reduced Cosmology.Springer Proc. Math. Stat., 60:371–375, 2014

    2014

  4. [4]

    S. M. M. Rasouli and Paulo Vargas Moniz. Exact Cosmological Solutions in Modified Brans-Dicke Theory.Class. Quant. Grav., 33(3):035006, 2016

    2016

  5. [5]

    Higher-order gravity in higher dimensions: geometrical origins of four-dimensional cosmology?The European Physical Journal C, 77(3):171, 2017

    Antonio Troisi. Higher-order gravity in higher dimensions: geometrical origins of four-dimensional cosmology?The European Physical Journal C, 77(3):171, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Quantum effects in kaluza-klein theories.Physical Review Letters, 50(3):141, 1983

    Thomas Appelquist and Alan Chodos. Quantum effects in kaluza-klein theories.Physical Review Letters, 50(3):141, 1983

    1983

  7. [7]

    J. M. Overduin and P. S. Wesson. Kaluza-Klein gravity.Phys. Rept., 283:303–380, 1997

    1997

  8. [8]

    P. V. Moniz. Is there a problem with quantum wormhole states in N=1 supergravity?Gen. Rel. Grav., 28:97–115, 1996

    1996

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum cosmology for the 21st century: A Debate

    Martin Bojowald, Claus Kiefer, and Paulo Vargas Moniz. Quantum cosmology for the 21st century: A Debate. In12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pages 589–608, 5 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    TASI Lectures on Supergravity and String Vacua in Various Dimensions

    Washington Taylor. TASI Lectures on Supergravity and String Vacua in Various Dimensions. 4 2011

    2011

  3. [11]

    String Field Theory: A Review

    Ashoke Sen and Barton Zwiebach. String Field Theory: A Review. 5 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Chris D. A. Blair, Johannes Lahnsteiner, Niels A. Obers, and Ziqi Yan. Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(16):161603, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    A class of cosmological solutions in induced matter theory with conformally flat bulk space.General Relativity and Gravitation, 41(11):2637–2656, 2009

    N Doroud, SMM Rasouli, and S Jalalzadeh. A class of cosmological solutions in induced matter theory with conformally flat bulk space.General Relativity and Gravitation, 41(11):2637–2656, 2009

    2009

  6. [14]

    S. M. M. Rasouli, A. F. Bahrehbakhsh, S. Jalalzadeh, and M. Farhoudi. Quantum mechanics and geodesic deviation in the brane world.EPL, 87(4):40006, 2009

    2009

  7. [15]

    Brane-World Gravity.Living Rev

    Roy Maartens and Kazuya Koyama. Brane-World Gravity.Living Rev. Rel., 13:5, 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Atazadeh and A

    K. Atazadeh and A. Eghbali. Brane cosmology in teleparallel andf(T) gravity.Phys. Scripta, 90(4):045001, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Noncompactified Kaluza–Klein Gravity.Universe, 8(8):431, 2022

    Seyed Meraj Mousavi Rasouli, Shahram Jalalzadeh, and Paulo Moniz. Noncompactified Kaluza–Klein Gravity.Universe, 8(8):431, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Cosmological scaling solutions of minimally coupled scalar fields in three dimensions

    Norman Cruz and Cristian Martinez. Cosmological scaling solutions of minimally coupled scalar fields in three dimensions. Class. Quant. Grav., 17:2867–2874, 2000

    2000

  11. [19]

    Dynamical analysis in scalar field cosmology.Physical Review D, 91(12):123535, 2015

    Andronikos Paliathanasis, Michael Tsamparlis, Spyros Basilakos, and John D Barrow. Dynamical analysis in scalar field cosmology.Physical Review D, 91(12):123535, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Modified theories of gravity and cosmological applications—topical collection, 2025

    Panayiotis Stavrinos and Emmanuel N Saridakis. Modified theories of gravity and cosmological applications—topical collection, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Ferreira, Antonio Padilla, and Constantinos Skordis

    Timothy Clifton, Pedro G. Ferreira, Antonio Padilla, and Constantinos Skordis. Modified Gravity and Cosmology.Phys. Rept., 513:1–189, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Noncommutativity and its role in constant-roll inflation models with non-minimal coupling constrained by swampland conjectures.Chinese Physics C, 49(2):025108, 2025

    Saeed Noori Gashti, Mohammad Reza Alipour, Mohammad Ali S Afshar, and Jafar Sadeghi. Noncommutativity and its role in constant-roll inflation models with non-minimal coupling constrained by swampland conjectures.Chinese Physics C, 49(2):025108, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Analytic solutions of brans–dicke cosmology: Early inflation and late time accelerated expansion.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 32(01):2250131, 2023

    Medine Ildes and Metin Arik. Analytic solutions of brans–dicke cosmology: Early inflation and late time accelerated expansion.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 32(01):2250131, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Swampland conjectures and noncommutative phase space in the constant-roll inflation with brans-dicke cosmology.International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 63(12):307, 2024

    Jafar Sadeghi, Saeed Noori Gashti, Mohammad Reza Alipour, and Mohammad Ali S Afshar. Swampland conjectures and noncommutative phase space in the constant-roll inflation with brans-dicke cosmology.International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 63(12):307, 2024. 21

    2024

  17. [25]

    About jordan and einstein frames: a study in inflationary magnetogenesis.Universe, 10(9):350, 2024

    Joel Vel´ asquez, H´ ector J Hortua, and Leonardo Casta˜ neda. About jordan and einstein frames: a study in inflationary magnetogenesis.Universe, 10(9):350, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Guzman, M

    W. Guzman, M. Sabido, and J. Socorro. Noncommutativity and scalar field cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 76:087302, 2007

    2007

  19. [27]

    Sravan Kumar

    Alvina Burgazli, Alexander Zhuk, Jo˜ ao Morais, Mariam Bouhmadi-L´ opez, and K. Sravan Kumar. Coupled scalar fields in the late Universe: The mechanical approach and the late cosmic acceleration.JCAP, 09:045, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Gravitational collapse of a homogeneous scalar field in deformed phase space.Physical Review D, 89(4):044028, 2014

    Seyed Meraj Mousavi Rasouli, Amir Hadi Ziaie, Jo˜ ao Marto, and PV Moniz. Gravitational collapse of a homogeneous scalar field in deformed phase space.Physical Review D, 89(4):044028, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Scalar field cosmology from a modified poisson algebra

    Genly Leon, Alfredo D Millano, and Andronikos Paliathanasis. Scalar field cosmology from a modified poisson algebra. Mathematics, 11(1):120, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    J. L. L´ opez-Pic´ on, M. Sabido, and C. Yee-Romero. Phase space deformations in SUSY cosmology.Phys. Lett. B, 849:138420, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    A simple coupling with cosmological implications.Physics Letters A, 113(9):467–470, 1986

    D Saez and VJ Ballester. A simple coupling with cosmological implications.Physics Letters A, 113(9):467–470, 1986

    1986

  24. [32]

    Socorro, M

    J. Socorro, M. Sabido, and L. Arturo Urena-Lopez. Classical and quantum Cosmology of the Saez-Ballester theory.Fizika B, 19:177–186, 2010

    2010

  25. [33]

    Bianchi type i cosmology in generalized saez–ballester theory via noether gauge symmetry.The European Physical Journal C, 72(4):1998, 2012

    Mubasher Jamil, Sajid Ali, D Momeni, and R Myrzakulov. Bianchi type i cosmology in generalized saez–ballester theory via noether gauge symmetry.The European Physical Journal C, 72(4):1998, 2012

    1998

  26. [34]

    Do, Phung Van Dong, Duy H

    Tuan Q. Do, Phung Van Dong, Duy H. Nguyen, and J. K. Singh. Anisotropic power-law inflation for the S´ aez–Ballester theory non-minimally coupled to a vector field.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(6):613, 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Cosmological models in s´ aez-ballester theory with bilinear varying deceleration parameter

    RK Mishra and Avtar Chand. Cosmological models in s´ aez-ballester theory with bilinear varying deceleration parameter. Astrophysics and Space Science, 365(4):76, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    The study of accelerating de models in saez–ballester theory of gravitation.The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(12):1294, 2022

    T Vinutha and K Venkata Vasavi. The study of accelerating de models in saez–ballester theory of gravitation.The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(12):1294, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Particle creation and bulk viscosity in bianchi-i universe in saez–ballester theory with different deceleration parameters.General Relativity and Gravitation, 55(10):107, 2023

    Chayanika Chetia, Mrinnoy M Gohain, and Kalyan Bhuyan. Particle creation and bulk viscosity in bianchi-i universe in saez–ballester theory with different deceleration parameters.General Relativity and Gravitation, 55(10):107, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Saez–ballester gravity in kantowski–sachs universe: a new reconstruction paradigm for barrow holographic dark energy.Physics of the Dark Universe, 41:101237, 2023

    Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano. Saez–ballester gravity in kantowski–sachs universe: a new reconstruction paradigm for barrow holographic dark energy.Physics of the Dark Universe, 41:101237, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    S. M. M. Rasouli, M. Sakellariadou, and Paulo Vargas Moniz. Geodesic deviation in S´ aez–Ballester theory.Phys. Dark Univ., 37:101112, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    S. M. M. Rasouli and Jo˜ ao Marto. Phase space noncommutativity, power-law inflation and quantum cosmology.Chaos Solitons Fractals, 187:115349, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Vacuum energy in saez-ballester theory and stabilization of extra dimensions.Universe, 8(2):60, 2022

    Pheiroijam Suranjoy Singh and Kangujam Priyokumar Singh. Vacuum energy in saez-ballester theory and stabilization of extra dimensions.Universe, 8(2):60, 2022

    2022

  34. [43]

    Observational constraints on anisotropic cosmology through the deceleration parameter in saez–ballester theory.Gravitation and Cosmology, 30(4):507–522, 2024

    Kangujam Priyokumar Singh and Asem Jotin Meitei. Observational constraints on anisotropic cosmology through the deceleration parameter in saez–ballester theory.Gravitation and Cosmology, 30(4):507–522, 2024

    2024

  35. [44]

    Cosmology of tsallis and kaniadakis holographic dark energy in saez– ballester theory and consideration of viscous van der waals fluid.Annals of Physics, 463:169611, 2024

    Khandro K Chokyi and Surajit Chattopadhyay. Cosmology of tsallis and kaniadakis holographic dark energy in saez– ballester theory and consideration of viscous van der waals fluid.Annals of Physics, 463:169611, 2024

    2024

  36. [45]

    Anisotropic power-law inflation for the s´ aez–ballester theory non-minimally coupled to a vector field.The European Physical Journal C, 85(6):613, 2025

    Tuan Q Do, Phung Van Dong, Duy H Nguyen, and JK Singh. Anisotropic power-law inflation for the s´ aez–ballester theory non-minimally coupled to a vector field.The European Physical Journal C, 85(6):613, 2025

    2025

  37. [46]

    Bianchi type-i cosmological model in s´ aez-ballester theory with variable deceleration param- eter.Astrophysics and Space Science, 366(5):47, 2021

    RK Mishra and Heena Dua. Bianchi type-i cosmological model in s´ aez-ballester theory with variable deceleration param- eter.Astrophysics and Space Science, 366(5):47, 2021

    2021

  38. [47]

    Priyanka Garg, Archana Dixit, and Anirudh Pradhan. Cosmological models of generalized ghost pilgrim dark energy (ggpde) in the gravitation theory of saez–ballester.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 18(14):2150221, 2021

    2021

  39. [48]

    Jagat Daimary and Rajshekhar Roy Baruah. Five dimensional bianchi type-i anisotropic cloud string cosmological model with electromagnetic field in saez-ballester theory.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9:878653, 2022

    2022

  40. [49]

    Estimated age of the universe in fractional cosmology.Fractal and Fractional, 7(12):854, 2023

    Emanuel Wallison de Oliveira Costa, Raheleh Jalalzadeh, Pedro Felix da Silva J´ unior, Seyed Meraj Mousavi Rasouli, and Shahram Jalalzadeh. Estimated age of the universe in fractional cosmology.Fractal and Fractional, 7(12):854, 2023

    2023

  41. [50]

    Fractional Scalar Field Cosmology.Fractal Fract., 8(5), 2024

    Seyed Meraj Mousavi Rasouli, Samira Cheraghchi, and Paulo Moniz. Fractional Scalar Field Cosmology.Fractal Fract., 8(5), 2024

    2024

  42. [51]

    Schwarzschild spacetime in fractal dimensions: Deflection of light, supermassive black holes and temperature effects.Modern Physics Letters A, 39(25n26):2450124, 2024

    Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi and Waranont Anukool. Schwarzschild spacetime in fractal dimensions: Deflection of light, supermassive black holes and temperature effects.Modern Physics Letters A, 39(25n26):2450124, 2024

    2024

  43. [52]

    Jalalzadeh, S

    R. Jalalzadeh, S. Jalalzadeh, A. Sayahian Jahromi, and H. Moradpour. Friedmann equations of the fractal apparent horizon.Phys. Dark Univ., 44:101498, 2024

    2024

  44. [53]

    Socorro, J

    J. Socorro, J. Juan Rosales, and Leonel Toledo-Sesma. Non-Commutative Classical and Quantum Fractionary Cosmology: FR W Case.Universe, 10(5):192, 2024

    2024

  45. [54]

    Fractional time-delayed differential equations: Applications in cosmological studies.Fractal and Fractional, 9(5):318, 2025

    Bayron Micolta-Riascos, Byron Droguett, Gisel Mattar Marriaga, Genly Leon, Andronikos Paliathanasis, Luis del Campo, and Yoelsy Leyva. Fractional time-delayed differential equations: Applications in cosmological studies.Fractal and Fractional, 9(5):318, 2025

    2025

  46. [55]

    S. M. M. Rasouli, S. Jalalzadeh, and P. V. Moniz. Broadening quantum cosmology with a fractional whirl.Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 36(14):2140005, 2021

    2021

  47. [56]

    Quantum fractionary cosmology: K-essence theory.Universe, 9(4):185, 2023

    J Socorro and J Juan Rosales. Quantum fractionary cosmology: K-essence theory.Universe, 9(4):185, 2023

    2023

  48. [57]

    Emergence of fractal cosmic space from fractional quantum 22 gravity.The European Physical Journal Plus, 138(9):1–16, 2023

    PF da Silva J´ unior, EW de Oliveira Costa, and S Jalalzadeh. Emergence of fractal cosmic space from fractional quantum 22 gravity.The European Physical Journal Plus, 138(9):1–16, 2023

    2023

  49. [58]

    Lobo, and Valdir B

    Gislaine Var˜ ao, Iarley P. Lobo, and Valdir B. Bezerra. Fractional quantum mechanics meets quantum gravity phenomenol- ogy.EPL, 148(3):30001, 2024

    2024

  50. [59]

    Uniform operator: Aligning fractional time quantum mechanics with basic physical principles.Int

    Xueling Duan, Hongyin Huang, and Ke Deng. Uniform operator: Aligning fractional time quantum mechanics with basic physical principles.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 40(17):2550033, 2025

    2025

  51. [60]

    Tunneling time in non-Hermitian space fractional quantum mechanics

    Mohammad Umar, Vibhav Narayan Singh, and Bhabani Prasad Mandal. Tunneling time in non-Hermitian space fractional quantum mechanics. 4 2025

    2025

  52. [61]

    Approximations of fractional integrals and caputo fractional derivatives.Applied Mathematics and Compu- tation, 178(2):527–533, 2006

    Zaid Odibat. Approximations of fractional integrals and caputo fractional derivatives.Applied Mathematics and Compu- tation, 178(2):527–533, 2006

    2006

  53. [62]

    Fractional derivative cosmology.arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.1171, 2009

    Mark D Roberts. Fractional derivative cosmology.arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.1171, 2009

    2009 arXiv

  54. [63]

    On riemann-liouville and caputo derivatives.Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2011(1):562494, 2011

    Changpin Li, Deliang Qian, and YangQuan Chen. On riemann-liouville and caputo derivatives.Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2011(1):562494, 2011

    2011

  55. [64]

    Quantum cosmology of fab four john theory with conformable fractional derivative.Universe, 6(4):50, 2020

    Isaac Torres, J´ ulio C´ esar Fabris, Oliver Fabio Piattella, and Antˆ onio Brasil Batista. Quantum cosmology of fab four john theory with conformable fractional derivative.Universe, 6(4):50, 2020

    2020

  56. [65]

    Fractional-order derivatives in cosmological models of accelerated expansion.Modern Physics Letters A, 36(14):2130014, 2021

    VK Shchigolev. Fractional-order derivatives in cosmological models of accelerated expansion.Modern Physics Letters A, 36(14):2130014, 2021

    2021

  57. [66]

    Conformal and non- minimal couplings in fractional cosmology.Fractal and Fractional, 8(5):253, 2024

    Kevin Marroqu ´ ın, Genly Leon, Alfredo D Millano, Claudio Michea, and Andronikos Paliathanasis. Conformal and non- minimal couplings in fractional cosmology.Fractal and Fractional, 8(5):253, 2024

    2024

  58. [67]

    Mark D. Roberts. Fractional Derivative Cosmology.SOP Trans. Theor. Phys., 1:310, 2014

    2014

  59. [68]

    V. K. Shchigolev. Cosmological Models with Fractional Derivatives and Fractional Action Functional.Commun. Theor. Phys., 56:389–396, 2011

    2011

  60. [69]

    Mubasher Jamil, Davood Momeni, and Muneer A. Rashid. Fractional Action Cosmology with Power Law Weight Function. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 354:012008, 2012

    2012

  61. [70]

    V. K. Shchigolev. Testing Fractional Action Cosmology.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 131(8):256, 2016

    2016

  62. [71]

    Garc ´ ıa-Aspeitia, Guillermo Fernandez-Anaya, Alberto Hern´ andez-Almada, Juan Maga˜ na, and Esteban Gonz´ alez

    Genly Leon Torres, Miguel A. Garc ´ ıa-Aspeitia, Guillermo Fernandez-Anaya, Alberto Hern´ andez-Almada, Juan Maga˜ na, and Esteban Gonz´ alez. Cosmology under the fractional calculus approach: a possibleH 0 tension resolution?PoS, CORFU2022:248, 2023

    2023

  63. [72]

    Millano, Genly Leon, Cristi´ an Erices, and Andronikos Paliathanasis

    Bayron Micolta-Riascos, Alfredo D. Millano, Genly Leon, Cristi´ an Erices, and Andronikos Paliathanasis. Revisiting Fractional Cosmology.Fractal Fract., 7:149, 2023

    2023

  64. [73]

    Millano, Genly Leon, Byron Droguett, Esteban Gonz´ alez, and Juan Maga˜ na

    Bayron Micolta-Riascos, Alfredo D. Millano, Genly Leon, Byron Droguett, Esteban Gonz´ alez, and Juan Maga˜ na. Frac- tional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet scalar field cosmology.Fractal Fract., 8:626, 2024

    2024

  65. [74]

    Fractional calculus

    Ricardo Almeida, Dina Tavares, and Delfim FM Torres. Fractional calculus. InThe Variable-Order Fractional Calculus of Variations, pages 1–19. Springer, 2018

    2018

  66. [75]

    Some fractional integral and derivative formulas revisited.Math- ematics, 12(17):2786, 2024

    Juan Luis Gonz´ alez-Santander and Francesco Mainardi. Some fractional integral and derivative formulas revisited.Math- ematics, 12(17):2786, 2024

    2024

  67. [76]

    About fractional calculus and its applications in physics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04186, 2025

    JJA de Oliveira and CFL Godinho. About fractional calculus and its applications in physics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04186, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Causal viscous Universe in S´ aez–Ballester theory.Can

    Sanasam Surendra Singh, Leishingam Kumrah, Md Khurshid Alam, Laishram Kapil Singh, and Lambamayum Anjana Devi. Causal viscous Universe in S´ aez–Ballester theory.Can. J. Phys., 102(1):61–68, 2024

    2024

  69. [78]

    Inflationary attractors from a non-canonical kinetic term

    Zhu Yi and Zong-Hong Zhu. Inflationary attractors from a non-canonical kinetic term. 6 2021

    2021

  70. [79]

    S. M. M. Rasouli and Paulo Vargas Moniz. Modified Saez–Ballester scalar–tensor theory from 5D space-time.Class. Quant. Grav., 35(2):025004, 2018

    2018

  71. [80]

    S. M. M. Rasouli, R. Pacheco, M. Sakellariadou, and P. V. Moniz. Late time cosmic acceleration in modified S´ aez–Ballester theory.Phys. Dark Univ., 27:100446, 2020

    2020

  72. [81]

    The paradigm of quantum cosmology through dunkl fractional laplacian operators and fractal dimensions.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 167:113097, 2023

    Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi and Waranont Anukool. The paradigm of quantum cosmology through dunkl fractional laplacian operators and fractal dimensions.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 167:113097, 2023

    2023

  73. [82]

    Jalalzadeh, H

    S. Jalalzadeh, H. Moradpour, G. R. Jafari, and P. V. Moniz. Fractional Schwarzschild–Tangherlini black hole with a fractal event horizon.Class. Quant. Grav., 42(14):145004, 2025

    2025

  74. [83]

    Quantum creation of a friedmann-robertson-walker universe: Riesz fractional derivative applied.Fractal and Fractional, 9(6):349, 2025

    Daniel L Canedo, Paulo Moniz, and Gil Oliveira-Neto. Quantum creation of a friedmann-robertson-walker universe: Riesz fractional derivative applied.Fractal and Fractional, 9(6):349, 2025

    2025

  75. [84]

    S. M. M. Rasouli, Nasim Saba, Mehrdad Farhoudi, Jo˜ ao Marto, and P. V. Moniz. Inflationary Universe in Deformed Phase Space Scenario.Annals Phys., 393:288–307, 2018

    2018

  76. [85]

    S. M. M. Rasouli. Noncommutativity, S´ aez–Ballester Theory and Kinetic Inflation.Universe, 8(3):165, 2022

    2022

  77. [86]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2018

  78. [87]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints.Astrophys

    Dillon Brout et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints.Astrophys. J., 938(2):110, 2022

    2022

  79. [88]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differ- ences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0.Astrophys. J., 977(1):120, 2024

    2024

  80. [89]

    SN H0pe: The First Measurement of H 0 from a Multiply Imaged Type Ia Supernova, Discovered by JWST.Astrophys

    Massimo Pascale et al. SN H0pe: The First Measurement of H 0 from a Multiply Imaged Type Ia Supernova, Discovered by JWST.Astrophys. J., 979(1):13, 2025

    2025

  81. [90]

    Freedman, Barry F

    Wendy L. Freedman, Barry F. Madore, Taylor J. Hoyt, In Sung Jang, Abigail J. Lee, and Kayla A. Owens. Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes.Astrophys. J., 985(2):203, 2025

    2025

  82. [91]

    23 Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity.Physics Reports, 775:1–122, 2018

    Sebastian Bahamonde, Christian G B¨ ohmer, Sante Carloni, Edmund J Copeland, Wei Fang, and Nicola Tamanini. 23 Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity.Physics Reports, 775:1–122, 2018

    2018

  83. [92]

    Mapping the chevallier-polarski-linder parametrization onto physical dark energy models.Physical Review D, 92(4):043001, 2015

    Robert J Scherrer. Mapping the chevallier-polarski-linder parametrization onto physical dark energy models.Physical Review D, 92(4):043001, 2015

    2015

  84. [93]

    Dynamics of cosmological scalar fields.Physical Review D, 89(8):083521, 2014

    Nicola Tamanini. Dynamics of cosmological scalar fields.Physical Review D, 89(8):083521, 2014

    2014

  85. [94]

    Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations.Physical Review D, 22(8):1882, 1980

    James M Bardeen. Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations.Physical Review D, 22(8):1882, 1980

    1980

  86. [95]

    Theory of cosmological perturbations

    Viatcheslav F Mukhanov, Hume A Feldman, and Robert Hans Brandenberger. Theory of cosmological perturbations. Physics reports, 215(5-6):203–333, 1992

    1992

  87. [96]

    Gauge invariant cosmological perturbation theory: A General study and its application to the texture scenario of structure formation.Fund

    Ruth Durrer. Gauge invariant cosmological perturbation theory: A General study and its application to the texture scenario of structure formation.Fund. Cosmic Phys., 15:209–339, 1994

    1994

  88. [97]

    Durrer and M

    R. Durrer and M. Sakellariadou. A New contribution to cosmological perturbations of some inflationary models.Phys. Rev. D, 50:6115–6122, 1994

    1994

  89. [98]

    S. M. M. Rasouli. Can fractional Newtonian cosmology describe all epoches of the universe with a single potential? 2025

    2025

  90. [99]

    J. Marto D. Oliveira, P. Moniz and S. M. M. Rasouli. Power-Law Inflation in n-Dimensional Fractional Scalar Field Cosmology. 2025

    2025

  91. [100]

    Boiza and Mariam Bouhmadi-L´ opez

    Carlos G. Boiza and Mariam Bouhmadi-L´ opez. Cosmological perturbations in a generalised axion-like dark energy model. Phys. Dark Univ., 48:101845, 2025

    2025

  92. [101]

    Santos, and Jackson Levi Said

    Dani de Boe, Fabiano F. Santos, and Jackson Levi Said. Cosmological scalar perturbations in Horndeski-like gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 111(6):064055, 2025

    2025

  93. [102]

    S. M. M. Rasouli, Mehrdad Farhoudi, and Hamid R. Sepangi. Anisotropic Cosmological Model in Modified Brans–Dicke Theory.Class. Quant. Grav., 28:155004, 2011

    2011

  94. [103]

    Extended anisotropic models in noncompact kaluza–klein theory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(7):075010, 2019

    SMM Rasouli and P Vargas Moniz. Extended anisotropic models in noncompact kaluza–klein theory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(7):075010, 2019

    2019

  95. [104]

    Bianchi i spacetimes in chiral–quintom theory.Universe, 8(10):503, 2022

    Andronikos Paliathanasis. Bianchi i spacetimes in chiral–quintom theory.Universe, 8(10):503, 2022

    2022

  96. [105]

    S. M. M. Rasouli. Noncompactified Kaluza–Klein theories and Anisotropic Kantowski-Sachs Universe.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2311.10247, November 2023

    2023 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Barrow holographic dark energy: reconstruction within saez-ballester theory in kantowski-sachs universe.Physica Scripta, 99(11):111501, 2024

    Khandro K Chokyi, Surajit Chattopadhyay, and Abdel Nasser Tawfik. Barrow holographic dark energy: reconstruction within saez-ballester theory in kantowski-sachs universe.Physica Scripta, 99(11):111501, 2024

    2024

  98. [107]

    A noncommutative bianchi i model with radiation.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 33(07n08):2450032, 2024

    G Oliveira-Neto and TM Abreu. A noncommutative bianchi i model with radiation.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 33(07n08):2450032, 2024

    2024

  99. [108]

    Lrs bianchi type-v cosmological model in f (q, t) theory of gravity with cold matter and holographic dark energy.Astronomy and Computing, 52:100961, 2025

    YS Solanke, S Mhaske, VJ Dagwal, and DD Pawar. Lrs bianchi type-v cosmological model in f (q, t) theory of gravity with cold matter and holographic dark energy.Astronomy and Computing, 52:100961, 2025

    2025

  100. [109]

    Stability of the kasner universe in f(t) gravity.Physical Review D, 97(4):044008, 2018

    Andronikos Paliathanasis, Jackson Levi Said, and John D Barrow. Stability of the kasner universe in f(t) gravity.Physical Review D, 97(4):044008, 2018

    2018

  101. [110]

    Kasner universes inf(t, ˆB) gravity.The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(12):1–8, 2022

    Andronikos Paliathanasis. Kasner universes inf(t, ˆB) gravity.The European Physical Journal Plus, 137(12):1–8, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.