Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Investigating the differential limb coupling effect for diffraction-limited spectrographs with PARVI

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first dedicated on-sky experiment to measure differential limb coupling—a star-spin-induced bias in precision Doppler readings—using the PARVI spectrograph, and identifies a template-fitting artifact that currently ob

desk verdict An honest progress report that usefully characterizes PARVI's guide camera and finds a BERV-correlated template bias, but it does not yet deliver the first direct DLC measurement it announces. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00349 v1 pith:JOXT7XCI submitted 2026-07-31 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP

Andrea S.J. Lin , Ashley D. Baker , Samuel Halverson , Nemanja Jovanovic , Dimitri Mawet , Garreth Ruane , Gautam Vasisht This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EP
keywords radialvelocitiesdifferentiallimbcouplingdiffraction-limitedspectrographssingle-modefibersextreme-precisionadaptiveopticsexoplanetsPARVI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Differential limb coupling (DLC) arises when a diffraction-limited spectrograph's fiber couples unequal amounts of light from the red- and blue-shifted halves of a partly resolved stellar disk, producing a spurious radial-velocity (RV) shift that depends on pointing. The authors set out to verify this predicted effect on sky for the first time, using the PARVI spectrograph and deliberately offsetting targets in an 'X' pattern to amplify the effect to hundreds of m/s. They characterized PARVI's tip-tilt guide camera, collected data on several fast-rotating and giant stars, and derived template-matching RVs. The RVs are dominated by a barycentric-correlated slope that the authors attribute to the template-building algorithm, not the instrument; after removing it, off-center exposures show extra scatter consistent with DLC, but the authors stop short of claiming a detection. If confirmed, the effect would be a dominant RV error term for future diffraction-limited instruments such as HISPEC, making this experiment a necessary step toward mitigation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the DLC scaling relation (their Eq. 1), which predicts that the spurious RV shift grows linearly with pointing offset, with the square of telescope diameter, and with the product of stellar angular diameter and rotation velocity. This relation is what allows the authors to choose targets and offsets that amplify the effect to hundreds of m/s, making a detection feasible at PARVI's precision. The experiment's other key mechanism is the X-scan observing pattern: two perpendicular offset scans, executed by commanding the tip-tilt stages, that separate the DLC signal from the unknown orientation of the stellar spin axis. The guide-camera data cubes provide the pointing trut

What would settle it

Re-observe a slow-rotating target (vsini near zero) with the same X-scan: if the off-center RV scatter persists, DLC is not the cause. Alternatively, for a target with known spin-axis orientation, verify that the scatter peaks when the offset is perpendicular to the axis and vanishes when it is parallel; a flat response would falsify the DLC interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that DLC-induced RV shifts can be deliberately produced and measured with a precision diffraction-limited spectrograph, and that the experiment described here—X-scan pointings, guide-camera characterization, and template-matching RV analysis—is the vehicle for that first measurement. The data yield a guide-camera plate scale of 37 mas/pix, a PSF jitter of 5–10 mas, and offset accuracy of order 20 mas. Template-matching RVs show a strong, airmass-independent slope correlated with barycentric velocity, which the authors identify as an artifact of constructing the master template from a limited number of nights. After fitting out that slope, off-ce

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on assuming that after subtracting the intra-night barycentric-correlated slope, the extra RV scatter in off-center exposures is caused by differential limb coupling rather than by the lower signal-to-noise of those exposures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If DLC is confirmed at the predicted amplitude, it will be a dominating RV error term for diffraction-limited EPRV spectrographs, and HISPEC on Keck II will require mitigation to reach its science goals.
  • The X-scan observation pattern can become a standard calibration procedure for future diffraction-limited spectrographs to measure their own DLC sensitivity.
  • The BERV-correlated slope in template-matching RVs implies that multi-epoch templates spanning a range of barycentric velocities are needed to avoid observer-frame contamination; otherwise velocity slopes of hundreds of m/s will masquerade as stellar or instrumental signals.
  • The characterization of PARVI's tip-tilt stages (offset accuracy ~20 mas, jitter 5–10 mas) quantifies the pointing error budget that future instruments must improve upon to keep DLC below the m/s level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the barycentric-correlated slope is indeed a template artifact, then its amplitude should shrink as the number of template nights and barycentric coverage grows; a reanalysis of the same PARVI data with a template built from a longer time baseline would provide a direct test.
  • The same data set could yield a null test of DLC by comparing off-center RV scatter for a target observed with the scan aligned along its known spin axis versus perpendicular; the perpendicular scan should show the larger effect.
  • Because the residual off-center scatter is also correlated with lower S/N, a decisive DLC measurement may require observing the brightest targets with longer exposures or a different deblending approach; a purely S/N-driven scatter model would then serve as the null hypothesis for the DLC claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an observing campaign with the diffraction-limited spectrograph PARVI designed to detect differential limb coupling (DLC) in radial velocities. The authors select a target list of stars with large angular diameter and high v sin i, execute an X-shaped sequence of tip-tilt offsets around the fiber center, and collect guiding and spectroscopic data over several nights. They characterize the guide camera plate scale (37 mas/pix), tip-tilt offset accuracy (deviations up to 20 mas), and PSF jitter (5–10 mas). Template-matching RVs show a strong intra-night slope correlated with barycentric Earth radial velocity, which the authors attribute to a known template bias. After subtracting a linear BERV-correlated trend, they report 'hints' of increased off-center scatter but explicitly refrain from drawing definitive conclusions. The paper is framed as a progress report on an experimental effort rather than a completed DLC detection.

Significance. If the experimental protocol is validated, this work provides a useful testbed for DLC predictions relevant to HISPEC and other diffraction-limited EPRV instruments. The guide-camera characterization (plate scale, offset accuracy, jitter) is a concrete and reusable contribution. The paper is honest and appropriately hedged: the authors report a designed experiment, an executed observing campaign, and a preliminary RV analysis, while flagging the confounds. However, the central scientific goal—directly measuring DLC-induced RV shifts—is not yet achieved. The observed off-center RV excess is not uniquely attributable to DLC, so the paper's main claim remains unsubstantiated. The significance therefore lies in the establishment of the observing strategy and calibration data, not in a verified DLC measurement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1–4.2] The paper states: 'When the intra-night slope is fit out, we see increased RV scatter in off-center vs. on-center RVs... suggesting hints of the direct RV impact of DLC.' This attribution is not established. First, the BERV-correlated slope is identified as an algorithmic artifact (Ref. 39), and the linear detrending used to remove it will also remove any DLC component that is partially covariant with the barycentric velocity over the night—no test of this degeneracy is provided. Second, the authors themselves note that off-center measurements have lower S/N and larger RV error bars; without S/N-matching or synthetic-signal injection, the scatter excess could be purely noise. I recommend testing the attribution by injecting synthetic DLC shifts into the same template-matching pipeline, or by comparing with CCF-based RVs, which are largely immune to the template bias.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Table 1, Eq. (1)] The guide-camera calibration numbers—plate scale 37 mas/pix, offset accuracy 'generally accurate to less than 0.5 pix' with deviations up to 20 mas, and jitter 5–10 mas—are quoted without formal uncertainties or statistical descriptions. Since the predicted ΔRV from Eq. (1) depends linearly on the offset, and since the interpretation of the RV scatter relies on the known offset positions, error bars on these quantities are load-bearing. Please provide standard errors on the plate scale (from the three binaries), a definition of jitter (e.g., standard deviation of centroid time series), and a description of how the offset residuals are computed.
  3. [Sec. 3] The predicted ΔRV values in Table 1 use the constants C_yJ and C_HK from simulations in Ref. 24, with overlapping authorship. This is not a circularity problem because the experiment is designed to test those predictions, but the target ranking and the expected amplitude inherit the simulation's systematic uncertainty, which is not quantified. I suggest adding a brief sensitivity statement (e.g., how much the target ordering or detection significance would change for plausible variations in the coupling constants) and explicitly noting the provenance of C_yJ and C_HK in the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The instrument name is rendered inconsistently as 'PARVI' (title/abstract) and 'PAR VI' (body). Please unify.
  2. [Sec. 4.1 / Fig. 3] The plate scale is derived from three systems, but the figure does not show per-measurement uncertainties or a weighted-mean formula. Please add error bars to the measured pixel separations and report the adopted value with an uncertainty.
  3. [Sec. 4.2 / Fig. 4] The y-axis label 'errorbar' in the caption should be 'error bars'. Also, clarify whether the jitter is the standard deviation of the centroid positions or another statistic.
  4. [Sec. 3] The phrase 'uranium-neon (UNe)' is commonly written 'U/Ne' or 'UNe'; consider standardizing. Also, 'data cube' is used, which is fine, but the hyphenation should be consistent.
  5. [Sec. 4.3] The code name appears as 'SERVAL' in some places and 'SERVAL' in others; please be consistent (e.g., 'SERVAL').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DLC scaling is a testable prior simulation from overlapping authors, and the paper's only fit is a nuisance detrend.

full rationale

The paper makes no claim to have verified the DLC prediction; the abstract states the RVs are 'deeply entangled with other instrumental and algorithmic effects,' and Sec. 4.3 explicitly says 'we refrain from drawing any definitive conclusions for the time being.' The experiment design uses Eq. (1) with constants C_yJ ≈ 1.0 m/s and C_HK ≈ 0.2 m/s from Ref. 24, whose authors overlap with the present paper. This is a self-citation, but it is not load-bearing in a circular sense: the constants come from an independent prior simulation, they are not fitted to the PARVI data, and the entire experiment is designed to test that prediction. No equation in this paper reduces a measured quantity to a fitted DLC parameter. The only fit is a linear detrend of the nightly BERV-correlated slope in Sec. 4.3, which is a nuisance correction; the residual off-center scatter is explicitly acknowledged to be confounded with lower S/N, so the paper does not equate that scatter with DLC. The guide-camera plate scale is calibrated using external binary-star separations (Sec. 4.1), and the observational data are characterized independently. The untested BERV-DLC covariance and template-bias concerns are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes an experiment and preliminary characterizations; the theoretical prediction it aims to test (Eq. 1 with C constants) is inherited from prior simulations by the same group, and the analysis assumes the template-systematic can be detrended without absorbing the DLC signal.

free parameters (3)
  • C_yJ = ≈1.0 m/s
    Simulated HISPEC fiber-coupling constant in Eq. (1), used to predict ΔRV for PARVI targets; taken from Ref. 24, not derived here.
  • C_HK = ≈0.2 m/s
    Same as C_yJ but for the HK bands; from Ref. 24.
  • tip-tilt offset step = 18 mas
    Chosen to be 0.5 pix on the guide camera, a significant fraction of the ~80 mas fiber diameter. The predicted ΔRV scales linearly with offset, so this is a hand-chosen parameter of the experiment.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DLC scaling relation (Eq. 1): ΔRV ∝ α_offset D_tel^2 α_* vsini with constants C_yJ≈1.0 m/s and C_HK≈0.2 m/s.
    The entire experimental design and expected amplitudes rely on the theory of Ref. 24; this relation is the hypothesis being tested, not proven here.
  • domain assumption Commanded tip-tilt offsets correspond to actual fiber offsets to ~1 mas accuracy.
    Stated in Sec. 2.3 based on instrument-team communication; the authors later measure deviations up to 20 mas, so this assumption is tested and found to be violated at the level relevant for mapping ΔRV vs offset.
  • ad hoc to paper After subtracting a linear BERV-correlated trend, residual template-matching RVs are dominated by DLC rather than by the systematic template contamination.
    Sec. 4.3 assumes that the intra-night slope can be removed without removing DLC; no degeneracy test is provided. This is the key assumption required for the central goal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating the differential limb coupling effect for diffraction-limited spectrographs with PARVI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOXT7XCI

@misc{pith2026260800349,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating the differential limb coupling effect for diffraction-limited spectrographs with PARVI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOXT7XCI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00349}
}
read the original abstract

A promising new architecture for extreme-precision radial velocity (EPRV) spectrographs, hunting for small-amplitude stellar Doppler shifts induced by orbiting planets, is to build diffraction-limited instruments by using single-mode fibers fed by an adaptive optics system. However, the target stars are partially resolved when observing at the diffraction limit, and the resulting RVs are expected to be affected by differential limb coupling (DLC), an effect where the red- and blue-shifted sides of the stellar disk are coupled unequally into the spectrograph, producing an RV error term on the order of m/s for nearby EPRV target stars for the upcoming HISPEC spectrograph for Keck II. We present our efforts to directly measure the RV shifts resulting from DLC for the first time, using the diffraction-limited spectrograph PARVI, in order to verify the expected behavior of DLC and subsequently develop mitigation strategies for HISPEC and other future instruments. We outline an observing strategy designed to produce DLC-induced RV shifts of hundreds of m/s, and describe the execution of this experiment with PARVI. We use these data to characterize the PARVI tip-tilt guide camera and its performance, and have begun analysis of the derived RVs, though this investigation has proven complicated since the RVs are deeply entangled with other instrumental and algorithmic effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00349 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the physical theory behind DLC, adapted from Ref. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of the X scan pattern employed in our DLC observations, with the positions of the fiber center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three multiple star systems as imaged by the PARVI tip-tilt guide camera. Pixel distances between stellar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Map of xy guide camera positions, as derived from the PSF centroid, for one set of DLC observations of Mu Gem. While the general shape of the X scan is present, individual pointings have deviated from their commanded positions by up to 20 mas. For each position, …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: RVs of two EPRV standard stars derived via the template-matching method, showing a roughly linear slope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Sub-m s −1 upper limits from a deep HARPS-N radial-velocity search for planets orbiting HD 166620 and HD 144579,

    John, A. A., Collier Cameron, A., Faria, J. P., Mortier, A., Wilson, T. G., Malavolta, L., Buchhave, L. A., Dumusque, X., L´ opez-Morales, M., Haywood, R. D., Rice, K., Sozzetti, A., Latham, D. W., Udry, S., Pepe, F., Pinamonti, M., Vanderburg, A., Ghedina, A., Cosentino, R., Stalport, M., Nicholson, B. A., Fiorenzano, A., and Poretti, E., “Sub-m s −1 upp...

    2023

  2. [2]

    Four Sub-Earth Planets Orbiting Barnard’s Star from MAROON-X and ESPRESSO,

    Basant, R., Luque, R., Bean, J. L., Seifahrt, A., Brady, M., Zhao, L. L., Brown, N., Das, T., St¨ urmer, J., Kasper, D., Gupta, R., and Stef´ ansson, G., “Four Sub-Earth Planets Orbiting Barnard’s Star from MAROON-X and ESPRESSO,” ApJ982, L1 (Mar. 2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Diving into the planetary system of Proxima with NIRPS: Breaking the metre per second barrier in the infrared,

    Su´ arez Mascare˜ no, A., Artigau,´E., Mignon, L., Delfosse, X., Cook, N. J., Bouchy, F., Doyon, R., Gonz´ alez Hern´ andez, J. I., Vandal, T., de Castro Le˜ ao, I., Stefanov, A. K., Faria, J., Cadieux, C., Lamontagne, P., Baron, F., Barros, S. C. C., Benneke, B., Bonfils, X., Bryan, M., Canto Martins, B. L., Cloutier, R., Cowan, N. B., de Freitas, D. B.,...

    2025

  4. [4]

    Extreme Precision Radial Velocity Working Group Final Report,

    Crass, J., Gaudi, B. S., Leifer, S., Beichman, C., Bender, C., Blackwood, G., Burt, J. A., Callas, J. L., Cegla, H. M., Diddams, S. A., Dumusque, X., Eastman, J. D., Ford, E. B., Fulton, B., Gibson, R., Halverson, S., Haywood, R. D., Hearty, F., Howard, A. W., Latham, D. W., L¨ ohner-B¨ ottcher, J., Mamajek, E. E., Mortier, A., Newman, P., Plavchan, P., Q...

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Characterization of the C-RED 2: a high-frame rate near-infrared camera,

    Gibson, R. K., Oppenheimer, R., Matthews, C. T., and Vasisht, G., “Characterization of the C-RED 2: a high-frame rate near-infrared camera,”JATIS6, 011002 (Jan. 2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Data reduction pipeline and performance for the Palomar radial velocity instrument,

    Gibson, R. K., Oppenheimer, R., Nilsson, R., Beichman, C., and Vasisht, G., “Data reduction pipeline and performance for the Palomar radial velocity instrument,”JATIS8, 038006 (July 2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Commissioning observations of HD 189733 with the PAlomar Radial Velocity Instrument,

    Cale, B. L., Kesseli, A., Beichman, C., Vasisht, G., Gibson, R. K., Oppenheimer, R., Fucik, J., Mawet, D., Paine, C., Matthews, K., Lockhart, T., Halverson, S., Shen, B., Bagheri, M., Leifer, S., Plavchan, P., and Hover, D., “Commissioning observations of HD 189733 with the PAlomar Radial Velocity Instrument,” JATIS9, 038006 (July 2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    PALM-3000: Exoplanet Adaptive Optics for the 5 m Hale Telescope,

    Dekany, R., Roberts, J., Burruss, R., Bouchez, A., Truong, T., Baranec, C., Guiwits, S., Hale, D., Angione, J., Trinh, T., Zolkower, J., Shelton, J. C., Palmer, D., Henning, J., Croner, E., Troy, M., McKenna, D., Tesch, J., Hildebrandt, S., and Milburn, J., “PALM-3000: Exoplanet Adaptive Optics for the 5 m Hale Telescope,” ApJ776, 130 (Oct. 2013)

    2013

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Design and performance of the PALM-3000 3.5 kHz upgrade,

    Meeker, S. R., Truong, T. N., Roberts, J. E., Shelton, J. C., Fregoso, S. F., Burruss, R. S., Dekany, R. G., Wallace, J. K., Baker, J. W., Heffner, C. M., Mawet, D., Rykoski, K. M., Tesch, J. A., and Vasisht, G., “Design and performance of the PALM-3000 3.5 kHz upgrade,” in [A...

    2020

  2. [10]

    iLocater: a diffraction-limited Doppler spectrometer for the Large Binocular Telescope,

    Crepp, J. R., Crass, J., King, D., Bechter, A., Bechter, E., Ketterer, R., Reynolds, R., Hinz, P., Kopon, D., Cavalieri, D., Fantano, L., Koca, C., Onuma, E., Stapelfeldt, K., Thomes, J., Wall, S., Macenka, S., McGuire, J., Korniski, R., Zugby, L., Eisner, J., Gaudi, B. S., He...

    2016

  3. [11]

    The final design of the iLocater spectrograph: an optimized architecture for diffraction- limited EPR V instruments,

    Crass, J., Aikens, D., Mason, J., King, D., Crepp, J. R., Bechter, A., Bechter, E., Farsad, M., Schwab, C., and VanSickle, M., “The final design of the iLocater spectrograph: an optimized architecture for diffraction- limited EPR V instruments,” in [Ground-based and Airborne I...

    2022

  4. [12]

    iLocater at the LBT,

    Crass, J., Johnson, M. C., Pinto, M. S. T., Engelman, M., Pappalardo, D., Sands, B., Derwent, M., Brady, J. E., Smithwright, M., Nathan, S. V. S., Datkuliak, J., Schwab, C., St urmer, J., Smous, J., Crepp, J. R., Bechter, A., Bechter, E., Aikens, D., Bender, C. F., Brandon, C....

    2026

  5. [13]

    Commissioning and on-sky performance verification of iLocater,

    Johnson, M. C., Pinto, M. S. T., Crass, J., Sands, B., Datkuliak, J., Brady, J. E., Engelman, M., Pappalardo, D., Derwent, M., Lesley, X., Crepp, J. R., Bechter, A., Bechter, E., Schwab, C., Aikens, D., Bender, C. F., Brandon, C., Brooks, C., de Jesus Castro, M., Chilcote, J.,...

    2026

  6. [14]

    Final design and on-sky testing of the iLocater SX acquisition camera: broad-band single-mode fibre coupling,

    Crass, J., Bechter, A., Sands, B., King, D., Ketterer, R., Engstrom, M., Hamper, R., Kopon, D., Smous, J., Crepp, J. R., Montoya, M., Durney, O., Cavalieri, D., Reynolds, R., Vansickle, M., Onuma, E., Thomes, J., Mullin, S., Shelton, C., Wallace, K., Bechter, E., Vaz, A., Powe...

    2021

  7. [15]

    High-resolution Infrared Spectrograph for Exoplanet Characterization with the Keck and Thirty Meter Telescopes,

    Mawet, D., Fitzgerald, M., Konopacky, Q., Beichman, C., Jovanovic, N., Dekany, R., Hover, D., Chisholm, E., Ciardi, D., Artigau, ´E., Banyal, R., Beatty, T., Benneke, B., Blake, G. A., Burgasser, A., Canalizo, G., Chen, G., Do, T., Doppmann, G., Doyon, R., Dressing, C., Fang, ...

    2019

  8. [16]

    The development of HISPEC for Keck and MODHIS for TMT: science cases and predicted sensitivities,

    Konopacky, Q. M., Baker, A. D., Mawet, D., Fitzgerald, M. P., Jovanovic, N., Beichman, C., Ruane, G., Bertz, R., Terada, H., Dekany, R., Lingvay, L., Kassis, M., Anderson, D., Tamura, M., Benneke, B., Beatty, T., Do, T., Nishiyama, S., Plavchan, P., Wang, J., Wang, J., Burgass...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Assembly and charac- terization of the front-end instrument (FEI) subsystem of Keck/HISPEC,

    Echeverri, D., Jovanovic, N., Baker, A. D., Roberts, M., Terrien, Y., Nash, R. B., Umiamaka, T., Ruane, G., Meneses, R., Brugger, J., Lammer, C., Ferrara, J., Mawet, D., and Bertz, R., “Assembly and charac- terization of the front-end instrument (FEI) subsystem of Keck/HISPEC,...

    2026

  10. [18]

    The design and fabrication status of the HISPEC spectrometer system,

    Fitzgerald, M. P., Baker, A. D., Bertz, R., Brearley, D., Calvin, B., Cook, T., Doppmann, G., Ferrara, J., Fucik, J. R., Gibson, R., Greffe, T., Gutierrez, M., Halverson, S. P., Hayashi, T., Johnson, C., Jovanovic, N., Kassis, M. F., Konopacky, Q. M., Kotani, T., Kress, E., La...

    2026

  11. [19]

    Updates on the full-scale development of the fiber delivery subsystem (FIB) of Keck/HISPEC,

    Jovanovic, N., III, J. I. B., Kotani, T., Sercel, G., Juhasz, A., Baker, A. D., Betters, C., Ross-Adams, A., Leon-Saval, S., Price, B., Pahuja, R., Meneses, R., Ferrara, J., Steiner, J., Wold, T., and Tamura, M., “Updates on the full-scale development of the fiber delivery sub...

    2026

  12. [20]

    HISPEC calibration unit update: integration, testing, and performance,

    Sappey, B., Baker, A. D., Maire, J., Lin, A., Konopacky, Q. M., Jovanovic, N., Halverson, S. P., Mawet, D., Fitzgerald, M., Ruffio, J.-B., Cale, B., Gibson, R., Leifer, S., Ferrara, J., and Bertz, R., “HISPEC calibration unit update: integration, testing, and performance,” in ...

    2026

  13. [21]

    Keck AO high order wavefront sensing and control: opto-mechanical design,

    Lilley, S. J., Wizinowich, P., Steiner, J., Wetherell, E., Thorne, J., Marin, E., Kassis, M., Guthery, C., Delorme, J., Bouchez, A., Roberts, M., Jovanovic, N., Sanchez, D., and Hinz, P., “Keck AO high order wavefront sensing and control: opto-mechanical design,” in [Adaptive ...

    2024

  14. [22]

    On-sky science verification of Keck Observatory’s HAKA adaptive optics upgrade,

    Gutierrez, M., Salama, M., Ciss´ e, M., Sallum, S. E., Jensen-Clem, R., Guthery, C., Bouchez, A., and de Kleer, K., “On-sky science verification of Keck Observatory’s HAKA adaptive optics upgrade,” in [Adap- tive Optics Systems X],Proc. SPIE14150, 14150145 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    First on-sky results of the HAKA deformable mirror upgrade,

    Guthery, C. E., Taylor, J., Cisse, M., Lilley, S., Marin, E., Steiner, J., Surendran, A., Wetherell, E., Wizinowich, P., Umiamaka, T., van Dam, M., Cetre, S., Bottom, M., Vincent, M., Jensen-Clem, R., Salama, M., Gutierrez, M., and Bouchez, A., “First on-sky results of the HAK...

    2026

  16. [24]

    Mitigating differential limb coupling as an R V error term in diffraction- limited spectrographs on large telescopes,

    Baker, A. D., Ruane, G., Jovanovic, N., Mawet, D., Halverson, S., Roberts, M., Franco-Ordovas, A., Fitzgerald, M., and Konopacky, Q., “Mitigating differential limb coupling as an R V error term in diffraction- limited spectrographs on large telescopes,” in [Ground-based and Ai...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Extreme precision radial velocity with extreme-AO and photonics: challenges and opportunities,

    Guyon, O., Vievard, S., Lallement, M., Leon-Saval, S., Kotani, T., Tamura, M., Deo, V., Lozi, J., Amezcua- Correa, R., Yerolatsitis, S., Lacour, S., and Huby, E., “Extreme precision radial velocity with extreme-AO and photonics: challenges and opportunities,” in [Adaptive Opti...

    2024

  18. [26]

    DeSSpOt: an instrument for stellar spin orientation determination,

    Lesage, A.-L., Schneide, M., and Wiedemann, G., “DeSSpOt: an instrument for stellar spin orientation determination,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV], McLean, I. S., Ramsay, S. K., and Takami, H., eds.,Proc. SPIE8446, 84463W (Sept. 2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Determination of the position angle of stellar spin axes,

    Lesage, A.-L. and Wiedemann, G., “Determination of the position angle of stellar spin axes,” A&A563, A86 (Mar. 2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    FIRST-PL: on-sky retrieval of Humu’s (Altair) spin axis using a photonic lantern on Subaru Telescope,

    Walk, A., Vievard, S., Guyon, O., Kim, Y. J., Huby, E., Lacour, S., Lallement, M., Nowak, M., Sarrazin, J., Lozi, J., D´ eo, V., Lucas, M., Fitzgerald, M., Leon-Saval, S., Norris, B., Sallum, S., Currie, T., Tamura, M., and Kotani, T., “FIRST-PL: on-sky retrieval of Humu’s (Al...

    2026

  21. [29]

    NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP) Mission Star List for the Habitable Worlds Observatory (2023),

    Mamajek, E. and Stapelfeldt, K., “NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP) Mission Star List for the Habitable Worlds Observatory (2023),”arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.12414 (Feb. 2024)

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Keck Planet Imager and Characterizer: concept and phased implementation,

    Mawet, D., Wizinowich, P., Dekany, R., Chun, M., Hall, D., Cetre, S., Guyon, O., Wallace, J. K., Bowler, B., Liu, M., Ruane, G., Serabyn, E., Bartos, R., Wang, J., Vasisht, G., Fitzgerald, M., Skemer, A., Ireland, M., Fucik, J., Fortney, J., Crossfield, I., Hu, R., and Benneke...

    2016

  23. [31]

    Recent upgrades to the Keck Planet Imager and Characterizer,

    Echeverri, D., Jovanovic, N., Delorme, J.-R., Guthery, C., Roberts, M., Nash, R., Horstman, K., Xuan, J., Xin, Y., Finnerty, L., Hsu, C.-C., Ruane, G., Leifer, S., Zimmer, J., Soda, S., Schofield, T., Wallace, J. K., Wang, J. J., Mawet, D., Marin, E., Wizinowich, P., Ge, J., a...

    2024

  24. [32]

    Design and development of NIRSPEC: a near-infrared echelle spectrograph for the Keck II telescope,

    McLean, I. S., Becklin, E. E., Bendiksen, O., Brims, G., Canfield, J., Figer, D. F., Graham, J. R., Hare, J., Lacayanga, F., Larkin, J. E., Larson, S. B., Levenson, N., Magnone, N., Teplitz, H., and Wong, W., “Design and development of NIRSPEC: a near-infrared echelle spectrog...

    1998

  25. [33]

    The HARPS-TERRA Project. I. Description of the Algorithms, Performance, and New Measurements on a Few Remarkable Stars Observed by HARPS,

    Anglada-Escud´ e, G. and Butler, R. P., “The HARPS-TERRA Project. I. Description of the Algorithms, Performance, and New Measurements on a Few Remarkable Stars Observed by HARPS,” ApJS200, 15 (June 2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Coravel— A new tool for radial velocity measurements,

    Baranne, A., Mayor, M., and Poncet, J. L., “Coravel— A new tool for radial velocity measurements,”Vistas in Astronomy23, 279–316 (Jan. 1979)

    1979

  27. [35]

    Spectrum radial velocity analyser (SER V AL). High-precision radial velocities and two alternative spectral indicators,

    Zechmeister, M., Reiners, A., Amado, P. J., Azzaro, M., Bauer, F. F., B´ ejar, V. J. S., Caballero, J. A., Guenther, E. W., Hagen, H.-J., Jeffers, S. V., Kaminski, A., K¨ urster, M., Launhardt, R., Montes, D., Morales, J. C., Quirrenbach, A., Reffert, S., Ribas, I., Seifert, W...

    2018

  28. [36]

    The Warm Neptune GJ 3470b Has a Polar Orbit,

    Stef` ansson, G., Mahadevan, S., Petrovich, C., Winn, J. N., Kanodia, S., Millholland, S. C., Maney, M., Ca˜ nas, C. I., Wisniewski, J., Robertson, P., Ninan, J. P., Ford, E. B., Bender, C. F., Blake, C. H., Cegla, H., Cochran, W. D., Diddams, S. A., Dong, J., Endl, M., Fredri...

    2022

  29. [37]

    Barycentric Corrections at 1 cm s −1 for Precise Doppler Velocities,

    Wright, J. T. and Eastman, J. D., “Barycentric Corrections at 1 cm s −1 for Precise Doppler Velocities,” PASP126, 838 (Sept. 2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Python Leap Second Management and Implementation of Precise Barycentric Correction (barycorrpy),

    Kanodia, S. and Wright, J., “Python Leap Second Management and Implementation of Precise Barycentric Correction (barycorrpy),”Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society2, 4 (Jan. 2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    A systematic bias in template-based radial velocity extraction algorithms,

    Silva, A. M., Santos, N. C., Faria, J. P., Martins, J. H. C., Cristo, E. A. S., Sousa, S. G., Viana, P. T. P., Artigau, ´E., Al Moulla, K., Castro-Gonz´ alez, A., Folha, D. F. M., Figueira, P., Schmidt, T., Pepe, F., Dumusque, X., Demangeon, O. D. S., Campante, T. L., Delfosse...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.