Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Functional renormalization group study of anomalous magnetic moment in a low energy effective theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that in a 2-flavor low-energy effective theory, quark anomalous magnetic moments are dynamically generated together with chiral symmetry breaking, with the down quark AMM about four times the up quark AMM.

desk verdict A useful, honest FRG computation of magnetized quark AMMs as dynamical outputs, with the main results likely right but the isospin-splitting truncation left unquantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20246 v1 pith:JR7FWR5T submitted 2025-06-25 hep-ph

Rui Wen , Chuang Huang , Mei Huang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords anomalousmagneticmomentfunctionalrenormalizationgroupchiralsymmetrybreakingcatalysisfour-quarkinteractionsSchwingerformalismquarkmatterinfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) of light quarks is a dynamical quantity that emerges from the same strong interactions that produce quark mass, rather than a free parameter. Using the functional renormalization group in a two-flavor low-energy effective theory under an external magnetic field, the authors compute the flow of the quark-photon vertex and find that both transverse and longitudinal AMMs are generated at the chiral symmetry breaking scale. The magnitude of the down quark AMM is about four times that of the up quark, and the transverse AMMs, together with the longitudinal d-quark AMM, fall monotonically with field strength while the longitudinal u-quark AMM rises slightly. At zero field, the constituent quark model built on these form factors yields proton and neutron magnetic moments close to experiment. If correct, the AMM should be treated as an emergent output of chiral dynamics, not as an input.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the functional renormalization group flow of the quark-photon vertex, projected onto the tensor structure $i\sigma_{\mu\nu}l^\nu$, which defines the form factor $F_{2,f}(0)=2m\kappa_f$ and the AMM $\kappa_f$ in the zero-photon-momentum limit. The flow is driven by the Fierz-complete set of four-quark couplings $\lambda^{(\alpha)}_{4q}$ running with the scale $k$, with quark propagators expressed in the Schwinger proper-time representation that carries a magnetic-field-dependent regulator. The identity that the AMM generation scale matches the chiral symmetry breaking scale is what makes the AMM an emergent quantity.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation of the quark-photon vertex form factors in an external magnetic field, or a full functional RG calculation that includes the 20 split tensor structures and the Schwinger phase, would directly test whether the d/u ratio is about 4 and whether the transverse AMMs fall monotonically with the magnetic field.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that quark anomalous magnetic moments are dynamically generated in a two-flavor low-energy effective theory: the renormalization group scale at which the AMMs appear coincides with the chiral symmetry breaking scale at which the quark mass grows. The flow of the quark-photon vertex, driven by Fierz-complete four-quark scatterings, produces $\kappa_u$ and $\kappa_d$ with $\kappa_d/\kappa_u \simeq 4$. The transverse AMMs and the longitudinal d-quark AMM decrease monotonically with the magnetic field strength, while the longitudinal u-quark AMM slightly increases.

Load-bearing premise

The AMM flow is computed with four-quark couplings that are isospin-symmetric and momentum-independent, and with the Schwinger phase neglected in the u-d mixing loop; if that truncation misses important magnetic-field effects, the d/u ratio and the monotonic B-dependence would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quark AMMs should be treated as outputs of chiral dynamics in magnetized QCD matter, not as fixed external parameters.
  • The computed $\kappa_u$, $\kappa_d$ and four-quark couplings can serve as inputs for other effective model studies of the QCD phase diagram and meson spectra.
  • The transverse AMMs decreasing with the magnetic field can remove the unphysical jumps that appear in models with a constant AMM.
  • At $B=0$, the constituent quark model with these form factors reproduces the proton and neutron magnetic moments to within a few percent of the experimental values.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the isospin splitting between $\lambda_{\pi^0}$ and $\lambda_{\pi^\pm}$ were included, the d/u ratio and the slope of the longitudinal u-quark AMM could change; the current result should be read as an average over the split channels.
  • The same framework could be extended to finite temperature and baryon chemical potential, where a field-dependent AMM may contribute to the inverse magnetic catalysis mechanism.
  • A first-principles QCD calculation of the quark-photon vertex, announced in the paper as upcoming work, would provide a direct quantitative test of the ratio and the magnetic-field dependence found here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript extends an earlier FRG study of four-quark interactions in a 2-flavor low-energy effective theory to compute quark anomalous magnetic moments in a homogeneous external magnetic field. The quark propagator is treated with the Schwinger proper-time formalism, the Fierz-complete four-quark couplings are evolved with the Wetterich equation, and the quark-photon vertex flow is projected onto the Pauli form factor. The authors report that the AMMs are dynamically generated at the chiral symmetry breaking scale, that the down-quark AMM magnitude is about four times the up-quark AMM, that the transverse AMMs and the longitudinal d-quark AMM decrease with eB while the longitudinal u-quark AMM increases slightly, and that the B=0 proton and neutron magnetic moments from the constituent quark model are close to experiment.

Significance. If the results are robust, the paper is significant because it treats quark AMMs as outputs of chiral dynamics rather than as external parameters, which is directly relevant to model studies of magnetized QCD matter and to the discussion of inverse magnetic catalysis. The computation has several genuine strengths: a Fierz-complete four-quark basis, a Schwinger-form propagator implementation, weak-field expansions in Eqs. (26)-(27) that provide a nontrivial cross-check of the numerics, comparison with lattice QCD for the quark mass, consistency with the independent NJL calculation of Ref. [59] for the d/u ratio, and the public availability of the code in Ref. [68]. The main weakness is that several truncations that could affect the quantitative conclusions are acknowledged but not quantified, so the central numerical claims are not yet shown to be robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II (after Eq. (3)); Sec. IV (Fig. 5)] The AMM flows in Eqs. (20)-(22) are evaluated with isospin-symmetric couplings λ^(α), although the paper itself notes that a magnetic field splits λπ into λπ0 and λπ±. Because ∂tκu and ∂tκd receive contributions from u- and d-quark loops with different coefficients, replacing the split couplings by an average is not guaranteed to preserve either the κd/κu≈4 ratio or the sign of dκu,∥/dB. I ask for a targeted quantitative check: either compute the AMMs in the 20-structure split basis, or estimate the sensitivity by varying λπ0/λπ± within the expected size of the splitting and reporting the induced change in Figure 7.
  2. [Sec. II (after Eq. (10)); Sec. III (after Fig. 2)] The Schwinger phase in the u-d mixing loop is set to zero. This phase is known to control charged-pion magnetic-field physics (see Refs. [32,69,70]) and therefore influences the B-dependence of the λ couplings that enter Eqs. (20)-(22). The manuscript gives no estimate of the resulting error. A quantitative estimate, or a simplified calculation with the phase included, is needed before the B-dependence of the AMMs can be considered robust.
  3. [Sec. III (Eq. (17) and text after Eq. (19))] Replacing the full quark-photon vertex by the classical vertex iΠ⊥μνγν on the right-hand side of the vertex flow is an uncontrolled truncation for a quantity that is itself a subleading tensor component. The same holds for the use of momentum-independent four-quark vertices. The paper should at least estimate the size of the omitted higher tensor structures Γ^(i), for instance by including the leading non-classical structure on the right-hand side and comparing the resulting κ values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (22)] The last factor is written as (-1 + tanh^2(q_u B r)); for a general flavor f it should presumably be tanh^2(q_f B r), consistent with the rest of the expression and with the instruction to change u ↔ d for the d-quark.
  2. [Sec. IV (Figs. 5 and 8)] The typo "2-piont" appears in the captions of Figs. 5 and 8 and in the surrounding text; it should be "2-point".
  3. [Sec. IV (before Fig. 9)] The sentence preceding Fig. 9, "we plot it as a function for scale k with several values of magnetic field strength of ," is grammatically incomplete, and the caption of Fig. 9 has a similar issue.
  4. [Sec. IV (discussion of Fig. 4)] The statement that non-dominant four-quark channels contribute approximately 6% to the quark masses and AMMs is not supported by a decomposition or a figure; please provide the quantitative basis for this number.
  5. [Sec. IV (Fig. 3)] The lattice comparison in the right panel of Fig. 3 would be more informative with error bars or a numerical measure of agreement; the qualitative statement "good agreement" is not quantified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain: quark AMMs are RG outputs, not fitted inputs; the 4:1 d/u ratio follows from a stated charge-ratio approximation, and the acknowledged isospin/phase truncations are robustness caveats rather than circular steps.

full rationale

The central AMM results are outputs of the flow equations (20)-(22), driven by flowed four-quark couplings that are themselves computed in the same FRG setup. No parameter is fitted to the AMM values: the initial conditions are fixed by the vacuum quark mass (350 MeV) and pion pole mass (141 MeV), and the B=0 proton/neutron magnetic moments are presented as a comparison with experiment, not used as constraints. The approximate relation kappa_d/kappa_u = (q_u^2/q_d^2) L_kappa(u)/L_kappa(d) = 4 L_kappa(u)/L_kappa(d) is derived in an explicitly stated limit (Sec. III, ignoring non-dominant channels and scalar/pseudoscalar splitting) and reflects the input charge ratio, which is an external constant rather than a fitted parameter; the full numerical result is then shown separately in Figs. 6-7. The acknowledged truncations - the isospin-symmetric Fierz basis and the neglected Schwinger phase in the u-d mixing loop (Sec. II, after eq. (10); Sec. IV, before Fig. 5: 'the splitting of lambda_pi is not taken into account') - are accuracy limitations that could affect the quantitative ratio and B-dependence, but they do not make the AMM a self-defined input or a renamed fit. Self-citations to Refs. [64,65,72] supply the Fierz basis and four-quark flow machinery; these are method/context citations rather than load-bearing circular support, because the relevant mass and AMM flow equations are displayed in the paper and the magnetic-field dependence is externally compared with lattice QCD results (Fig. 3). No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the derivation is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a calibrated but truncated effective theory: two mass/coupling parameters are fitted to vacuum observables, the truncation drops momentum dependence and magnetic-field-induced isospin splitting, and the Schwinger phase in the u-d mixing loop is ignored. These choices are not hidden, but they are the real cost of the calculation.

free parameters (4)
  • Initial quark mass m_Lambda = 13.5 MeV
    Set at the ultraviolet cutoff Lambda=1 GeV so the flow produces a vacuum quark mass of 350 MeV; the AMM loop functions are proportional to this mass.
  • Initial four-quark couplings lambda_pi,Lambda = lambda_sigma,Lambda = 10.6 Lambda^-2
    Chosen so the pion pole mass is 141 MeV and the vacuum quark mass is 350 MeV; these calibrations set the strength that drives the AMM flows.
  • Ultraviolet cutoff Lambda = 1 GeV
    Chosen by hand as the starting scale of the effective theory; quantitative AMM values depend on this scale.
  • Regulator shape = exponential, Litim checked qualitatively
    The exponential regulator in eq. (6) is a scheme choice; the authors state Litim gives qualitatively the same results but give no quantitative uncertainty.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Wetterich flow equation and the FRG truncation to two- and four-point functions
    The exact flow equation is the basis for the two- and four-point flows in Sec. II, with the usual approximation of a finite set of operators.
  • standard math Schwinger proper-time quark propagator in a homogeneous magnetic field
    Used for quark propagators in eq. (5); this is the exact solution for a charged fermion in a constant field in this gauge.
  • domain assumption Momentum-independent Fierz-complete four-quark basis
    The effective action in eq. (1) keeps only local four-quark scatterings; momentum dependence is dropped, which is a truncation of the full effective action.
  • ad hoc to paper Isospin-symmetric tensor basis kept under magnetic field
    Section II states the magnetic field splits the 8 structures into 20, but this work uses the isospin-symmetric basis and defers the splitting.
  • ad hoc to paper Neglect of the Schwinger phase in the u-d mixing loop
    Section II, paragraph after eq. (10): the phase cancels in same-flavor loops but remains in u-d mixing; the contribution is dropped.
  • ad hoc to paper Classical quark-photon vertex on the right-hand side of the AMM flow
    Section III before eq. (20): Gamma_Abarqq is approximated by i Pi^perp gamma_nu inside the loop, omitting feedback from non-classical tensor structures.
  • domain assumption Constituent quark model relation for nucleon magnetic moments
    Eqs. (23)-(25) convert quark form factors to nucleon magnetic moments; this model assumption is used only for the B=0 comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Functional renormalization group study of anomalous magnetic moment in a low energy effective theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JR7FWR5T

@misc{pith2026250620246,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Functional renormalization group study of anomalous magnetic moment in a low energy effective theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JR7FWR5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20246}
}
abstract

The quark anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) are investigated in a 2-flavor low-energy effective theory within the functional renormalization group (FRG) approach under an external magnetic field. The Schwinger formalism is adopted for quark propagators, and Fierz-complete four-quark scatterings are self-consistently included through the renormalization group flows. We find that the quark AMMs are dynamically generated with the chiral symmetry breaking, and the magnitude of the AMM of the down quark is around 4 times larger than that of the up quark. The transverse AMMs and the longitudinal d-quark AMM monotonically decrease with the magnetic field strength, while the longitudinal u-quark AMM slightly increases with the magnetic field strength. At $B=0$, the magnetic moments of proton and neutron are computed using the constituent quark model, which are close to the experimental values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20246 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams of flow equations of two- and four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Feynman diagram of the flow equation of the quark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Left panel: The quark masses as functions of RG scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left panel: The four-quark couplings of Fierz complete channels as functions of the strength of the magnetic field. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the dominant four-quark couplings as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The anomalous magnetic moments as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The anomalous magnetic moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leading-Order QCD Equation of State in Strong Magnetic Fields at Nonzero Baryon Chemical Potential

    hep-lat 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Continuum-estimated leading-order EoS coefficients in magnetized strangeness-neutral QCD at nonzero baryon chemical potential show temperature-band crossings in q1 and P2 and a possible sign change of the trace anomal...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [59]

    Ghosh, N

    S. Ghosh, N. Chaudhuri, P. Roy, and S. Sarkar, Thermo- magnetic modification of the anomalous magnetic mo- ment of quarks using the NJL model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 116008 (2021), arXiv:2104.14112 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [68]

    https://github.com/wwrr09/NJLtype-FRG

    work page

  3. [1]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov, and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009), arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2009

  4. [2]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012), arXiv:1201.5108 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [3]

    Vachaspati, Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions, Phys

    T. Vachaspati, Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Lett. B 265, 258 (1991)

    work page 1991

  6. [4]

    Durrer and A

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013), arXiv:1303.7121 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [5]

    Kiuchi, P

    K. Kiuchi, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neu- tron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124034 (2015), arXiv:1509.09205 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [6]

    D. G. Y. P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure , Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 326 (Springer, 2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 75 references
  1. [7]

    R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - implications for gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. Lett. 392, L9 (1992)

    1992

  2. [8]

    Lai and S

    D. Lai and S. L. Shapiro, Cold Equation of State in a Strong Magnetic Field: Effects of Inverse beta -Decay, Astrophys. J. 383, 745 (1991)

    1991

  3. [9]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008), arXiv:0711.0950 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [10]

    D. E. Kharzeev and D. T. Son, Testing the chiral mag- netic and chiral vortical effects in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 062301 (2011), arXiv:1010.0038 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Fukushima and J

    K. Fukushima and J. M. Pawlowski, Magnetic catalysis in hot and dense quark matter and quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 86, 076013 (2012), arXiv:1203.4330 [hep- ph]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [12]

    S. P. Klevansky and R. H. Lemmer, Chiral symmetry restoration in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with a con- stant electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D39, 3478 (1989)

    1989

  7. [13]

    K. G. Klimenko, Three-dimensional Gross-Neveu model in an external magnetic field, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 89, 211 (1991)

    1991

  8. [14]

    V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, Di- mensional reduction and catalysis of dynamical symme- try breaking by a magnetic field, Nucl. Phys. B 462, 249 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9509320. 8

    1996 arXiv

  9. [15]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schafer, QCD quark condensate in exter- nal magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 86, 071502 (2012), arXiv:1206.4205 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Tomiya, H.-T

    A. Tomiya, H.-T. Ding, X.-D. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Mukherjee, and C. Schmidt, Phase structure of three flavor QCD in external magnetic fields us- ing HISQ fermions, PoS LA TTICE2018, 163 (2019), arXiv:1904.01276 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [17]

    J. O. Andersen, QCD phase diagram in a constant mag- netic background: Inverse magnetic catalysis: where models meet the lattice, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 189 (2021), arXiv:2102.13165 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [18]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer, and K. K. Szabo, The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, JHEP 02, 044, arXiv:1111.4956 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  13. [19]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Chiral properties of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014505 (2021), arXiv:2008.00493 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [20]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endr¨ odi, S. D. Katz, and A. Sch¨ afer, The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields, JHEP 08, 177, arXiv:1406.0269 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  15. [21]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, M. Constantinou, M. Costa, G. Endrodi, S. D. Katz, H. Panagopoulos, and A. Schafer, Magnetic susceptibility of QCD at zero and at finite temperature from the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 86, 094512 (2012), arXiv:1209.6015 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [22]

    G. S. Bali, B. B. Brandt, G. Endr˝ odi, and B. Gl¨ aßle, Meson masses in electromagnetic fields with Wil- son fermions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034505 (2018), arXiv:1707.05600 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Bignell, W

    R. Bignell, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Pion magnetic polarisability using the background field method, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135853 (2020), arXiv:2005.10453 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [24]

    V. G. Bornyakov, P. V. Buividovich, N. Cundy, O. A. Kochetkov, and A. Sch¨ afer, Deconfinement transition in two-flavor lattice QCD with dynamical overlap fermions in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 90, 034501 (2014), arXiv:1312.5628 [hep-lat]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [25]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, J. H. Liu, and X. D. Wang, Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons in thermomagnetic QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034514 (2022), arXiv:2201.02349 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Ding, J.-B

    H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, A. Kumar, S.-T. Li, and J.-H. Liu, Baryon-Electric Charge Correlations and Chemical Potentials as Probes of Magnetized QCD, PoS LA T- TICE2024, 191 (2025), arXiv:2502.02956 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Ding, J.-B

    H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, A. Kumar, and S.-T. Li, Second order fluctuations of conserved charges in external mag- netic fields, (2025), arXiv:2503.18467 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Inagaki, D

    T. Inagaki, D. Kimura, and T. Murata, Four fermion interaction model in a constant magnetic field at finite temperature and chemical potential, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111, 371 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312005

    2004 arXiv

  23. [29]

    J. Chao, L. Yu, and M. Huang, Zeta function regular- ization of the photon polarization tensor for a magne- tized vacuum, Phys. Rev. D90, 045033 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 029903 (2015)], arXiv:1403.0442 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [30]

    L. Yu, J. Van Doorsselaere, and M. Huang, Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the three-flavor NJL model with axial-vector interaction, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074011 (2015), arXiv:1411.7552 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [31]

    S. S. Avancini, R. L. S. Farias, M. Benghi Pinto, W. R. Tavares, and V. S. Tim´ oteo,π0 pole mass calculation in a strong magnetic field and lattice constraints, Phys. Lett. B 767, 247 (2017), arXiv:1606.05754 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Coppola, D

    M. Coppola, D. G´ omez Dumm, and N. N. Scoc- cola, Charged pion masses under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model, Phys. Lett. B 782, 155 (2018), arXiv:1802.08041 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Coppola, D

    M. Coppola, D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Neutral and charged pion properties under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054014 (2019), arXiv:1907.05840 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [34]

    J. Mei, T. Xia, and S. Mao, Mass spectra of neu- tral mesons K0, π 0, η, η ′ at finite magnetic field, temperature and baryon chemical potential, (2022), arXiv:2212.04778 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [35]

    J. Mei, R. Wen, S. Mao, M. Huang, and K. Xu, Magnetic catalysis and diamagnetism from pion fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034024 (2024), arXiv:2402.19193 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    R. Wen, S. Yin, W.-j. Fu, and M. Huang, Functional renormalization group study of neutral and charged pions in magnetic fields in the quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D 108, 076020 (2023), arXiv:2306.04045 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Kamikado and T

    K. Kamikado and T. Kanazawa, Chiral dynamics in a magnetic field from the functional renormalization group, JHEP 03, 009, arXiv:1312.3124 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  32. [38]

    Kamikado and T

    K. Kamikado and T. Kanazawa, Magnetic susceptibility of a strongly interacting thermal medium with 2+1 quark flavors, JHEP 01, 129, arXiv:1410.6253 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  33. [39]

    Ayala, R

    A. Ayala, R. L. S. Farias, S. Hern´ andez-Ortiz, L. A. Hern´ andez, D. M. Paret, and R. Zamora, Magnetic field- dependence of the neutral pion mass in the linear sigma model coupled to quarks: The weak field case, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114008 (2018), arXiv:1809.08312 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Braun, W

    J. Braun, W. A. Mian, and S. Rechenberger, Delayed Magnetic Catalysis, Phys. Lett. B 755, 265 (2016), arXiv:1412.6025 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Fu and Y.-x

    W.-j. Fu and Y.-x. Liu, Four-fermion interactions and the chiral symmetry breaking in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074019 (2017), arXiv:1705.09841 [hep- ph]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Mueller and J

    N. Mueller and J. M. Pawlowski, Magnetic catalysis and inverse magnetic catalysis in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 116010 (2015), arXiv:1502.08011 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Hattori, K

    K. Hattori, K. Itakura, and S. Ozaki, Strong-Field Physics in QED and QCD: From Fundamentals to Ap- plications, (2023), arXiv:2305.03865 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Adhikari et al., Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields, (2024), arXiv:2412.18632 [nucl-th]

    P. Adhikari et al., Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields, (2024), arXiv:2412.18632 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [45]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

    1995

  40. [46]

    Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields: Foundations (Cambridge university press, 2002)

    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields: Foundations (Cambridge university press, 2002)

    2002

  41. [47]

    Chang, Y.-X

    L. Chang, Y.-X. Liu, and C. D. Roberts, Dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 072001 (2011), arXiv:1009.3458 [nucl-th]

    2011 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Fayazbakhsh and N

    S. Fayazbakhsh and N. Sadooghi, Anomalous magnetic moment of hot quarks, inverse magnetic catalysis, and reentrance of the chiral symmetry broken phase, Phys. Rev. D 90, 105030 (2014), arXiv:1408.5457 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Chaudhuri, S

    N. Chaudhuri, S. Ghosh, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model, Phys. 9 Rev. D 99, 116025 (2019), arXiv:1907.03990 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [50]

    K. Xu, J. Chao, and M. Huang, Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on magnetized QCD matter and meson spectra, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076015 (2021), arXiv:2007.13122 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Yang and S.-Q

    C.-Y. Yang and S.-Q. Feng, Quark Anomalous Magnetic Moments and Neutral Pseudoscalar Meson Dynamics in Magnetized QCD Matter, (2025), arXiv:2503.17056 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Mao, Inverse catalysis effect of the quark anomalous magnetic moment to chiral restoration and deconfine- ment phase transitions at finite baryon chemical poten- tial, Phys

    S. Mao, Inverse catalysis effect of the quark anomalous magnetic moment to chiral restoration and deconfine- ment phase transitions at finite baryon chemical poten- tial, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034018 (2022), arXiv:2206.12054 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Strickland, V

    M. Strickland, V. Dexheimer, and D. P. Menezes, Bulk Properties of a Fermi Gas in a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. D 86, 125032 (2012), arXiv:1209.3276 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [54]

    Mondal, S

    R. Mondal, S. Duari, N. Chaudhuri, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Speed of sound and isothermal compressibility in a magnetized quark matter with anomalous magnetic moment of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054010 (2024), arXiv:2408.04398 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [55]

    R. L. S. Farias, W. R. Tavares, R. M. Nunes, and S. S. Avancini, Effects of the quark anomalous magnetic mo- ment in the chiral symmetry restoration: magnetic catal- ysis and inverse magnetic catalysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 674 (2022), arXiv:2109.11112 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Chao and Y.-X

    J. Chao and Y.-X. Liu, Dimensional reduction and the generalized pion in a magnetic field within the NJL model, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074038 (2023), arXiv:2202.05090 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Mei and S

    J. Mei and S. Mao, Inverse catalysis effect of the quark anomalous magnetic moment to chiral restoration and deconfinement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114035 (2020), arXiv:2008.12123 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Lin and M

    F. Lin and M. Huang, Magnetic correction to the anoma- lous magnetic moment of electrons, Commun. Theor. Phys. 74, 055202 (2022), arXiv:2112.01051 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [60]

    E. S. Fraga, L. F. Palhares, and C. Villavicencio, Quark anomalous magnetic moment in an extreme magnetic background from perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116018 (2024), arXiv:2403.10641 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  55. [62]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisa- tion group, Annals Phys. 322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0512261

    2007

  56. [63]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of el- ementary particles based on an analogy with supercon- ductivity. II., Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961)

    1961

  57. [64]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, and Y.-y. Tan, Four-quark scatterings in QCD I, SciPost Phys. 14, 069 (2023), arXiv:2209.13120 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [65]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, and Y.-y. Tan, Four-quark scatterings in QCD II, SciPost Phys. 17, 148 (2024), arXiv:2401.07638 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  60. [67]

    A. K. Cyrol, M. Mitter, and N. Strodthoff, FormTracer - A Mathematica Tracing Package Using FORM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 219, 346 (2017), arXiv:1610.09331 [hep- ph]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Mao, Pions in magnetic field at finite temperature, Phys

    S. Mao, Pions in magnetic field at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056005 (2019), arXiv:1808.10242 [nucl- th]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Gomez Dumm, S

    D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Charged meson masses under strong magnetic fields: Gauge invariance and Schwinger phases, Phys. Rev. D 108, 016012 (2023), arXiv:2306.04128 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Towards quantitative precision in functional QCD I, (2024), arXiv:2408.08413 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    In addi- tion, a lattice QCD calculation of the quark AMMs could provide valuable guidance and a benchmark for further investigation

    will be carried out in the upcoming works. In addi- tion, a lattice QCD calculation of the quark AMMs could provide valuable guidance and a benchmark for further investigation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Jie Mei, Fan Lin and Shi-jun Mao for their valuable discussions. This work ...

  65. [73]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, Y.-y. Tan, and L.-j. Zhou, Four-quark scatterings in QCD III, (2025), arXiv:2502.14388 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Chyi, C.-W

    T.-K. Chyi, C.-W. Hwang, W. F. Kao, G.-L. Lin, K.- W. Ng, and J.-J. Tseng, The weak field expansion for processes in a homogeneous background magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 62, 105014 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9912134

    2000 arXiv

  67. [75]

    P. Mohr, D. Newell, B. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, CO- DATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physi- cal Constants: 2022, (2024), arXiv:2409.03787 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.