Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A Comprehensive Study on A$_2$PdH$_2$: From Ambient to High Pressure

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Under pressure, Li2PdH2 turns from a non-superconducting tetragonal phase into a monoclinic phase whose Tc rises from 0.6 K at 10 GPa to 4.7 K at 50 GPa.

desk verdict The abstract describes a Li2PdH2 superconductivity study, but the body is a different paper on altermagnetism; no supporting calculations exist in the manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04835 v1 pith:JTSMQZ47 submitted 2025-08-06 cond-mat.supr-con

Zahra Alizadeh , Yue-Wen Fang , Ion Errea , M.R. Mohammadizadeh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Li2PdH2high-pressuresuperconductivityhydridesrandomstructuresearchphononcalculationselectron-phononcouplingphasetransitionfirst-principlesprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a first-principles prediction about the hydride Li$_2$PdH$_2$ under pressure. Using random structure searching and phonon calculations, it argues that the compound switches from a tetragonal I4/mmm structure at ambient pressure to a monoclinic C2/m structure at about 5 GPa, and that the monoclinic phase stays thermodynamically stable up to at least 50 GPa. The paper's central superconducting claim is that the tetragonal phase shows no superconductivity, while the monoclinic phase is a weak, pressure-enhanced superconductor with $T_c$ increasing from 0.6 K at 10 GPa to 4.7 K at 50 GPa, driven mainly by low-frequency Li- and Pd-derived phonon modes rather than by hydrogen. It then extends the same methods to the A$_2$PdH$_2$ (A = Na, K, Rb, Cs) series, predicting weak or negligible $T_c$ for the dynamically stable members and phonon instabilities for Cs. A sympathetic reader would take this as a concrete computational map of where and why this palladium hydride family might superconduct.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on three linked tools: random structure searching to propose candidate crystal structures, DFT enthalpy comparisons to pick the ground state at each pressure, and harmonic plus anharmonic phonon calculations to assess dynamical stability and to obtain the phonon linewidths used in electron-phonon coupling. The superconducting estimates come from the McMillan-Allen-Dynes equation, whose input is the electron-phonon coupling constant $\lambda$ and a Coulomb pseudopotential $\mu^*$. The decisive physical input is which phonon modes couple to the electrons: in the monoclinic phase these are the low-frequency Li- and Pd-derived modes, while hydrogen-dominated high-frequency mode

What would settle it

Synthesize Li2PdH2 under pressure and measure resistivity or ac susceptibility from 5 to 50 GPa; a superconducting transition absent in the predicted pressure range, or a structural transition at a clearly different pressure, would falsify the claim. A cheaper computational check is to recompute the enthalpy competition at 10 GPa with a different exchange-correlation functional or a more exhaustive structure search; finding a lower-enthalpy competitor there would break the ground-state assumption on which the superconductivity assignment rests.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated as the authors would state it, is that Li$_2$PdH$_2$ has two pressure regimes with different superconducting behavior. A tetragonal I4/mmm phase is the ground state up to 5 GPa and remains non-superconducting even after anharmonic phonon corrections, because its electron-phonon coupling is weak and hydrogen contributes little near the Fermi level. Above 5 GPa a monoclinic C2/m phase takes over and is stable to 50 GPa; in this phase the electron-phonon coupling is still weak but grows with pressure, yielding $T_c$ values of 0.6 K at 10 GPa and 4.7 K at 50 GPa. The pairing is mainly carried by low-frequency Li and Pd vibrations, with hydrogen playing a minor role, and

Load-bearing premise

The entire phase diagram and the assignment of superconductivity to the monoclinic phase rest on the assumption that random structure searching combined with GGA-level DFT enthalpies finds the true ground states of Li2PdH2 at every pressure; if a lower-enthalpy structure was missed or GGA misorders the two phases, the phase boundaries and the Tc story collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the monoclinic C2/m phase is the true ground state above 5 GPa, then Li$_2$PdH$_2$ is a testable, weakly superconducting hydride whose $T_c$ can be tuned by pressure.
  • The absence of superconductivity in the tetragonal phase up to its stability limit means that structural phase choice, not just chemistry, controls whether this material superconducts.
  • Because pairing comes from Li and Pd modes, not hydrogen, this system contradicts the rule of thumb that hydride superconductivity requires hydrogen-dominated high-frequency phonons.
  • Within the same family, Na$_2$PdH$_2$ and K$_2$PdH$_2$ are predicted to be dynamically stable with low $T_c$ values, giving ambient-pressure candidates for measurement.
  • Cs$_2$PdH$_2$ being dynamically unstable suggests the heavier alkali end of the series needs pressure or another stabilizing influence before it can host superconductivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An editorial caution grounded in the supplied text: the body of this record describes a different study (inverse-Lieb altermagnets), so the hydride results are visible here only through the abstract; the quoted $T_c$ values should be treated as unverified until the accompanying calculations are available.
  • If the pairing mechanism is really Li- and Pd-phonon dominated, isotopic substitution of lithium or palladium should shift $T_c$ by an amount compatible with the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula; measuring that shift would test the mechanism without waiting for a full superconducting theory.
  • The reported absolute $T_c$ values depend on the unstated Coulomb pseudopotential $\mu^*$; a natural test is to compute $T_c$ over the customary $\mu^* = 0.1$–0.2 range and see whether the 0.6–4.7 K window survives.
  • A practical screening extension the authors do not pursue: use the same random-structure-plus-phonon workflow on mixed-alkali or partially substituted A$_{2-x}$A$'_x$PdH$_2$ compositions to look for a member of the family with stronger coupling and higher $T_c$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2508.04835 announces a first-principles study of the hydride Li2PdH2 under pressure, claiming a tetragonal I4/mmm phase stable up to 5 GPa, a monoclinic C2/m phase stable to 50 GPa, and weakly superconducting behavior with Tc rising from 0.6 K at 10 GPa to 4.7 K at 50 GPa, plus analogous predictions for Na, K, Rb, and Cs compounds. The full text of the submission, however, is a different paper, titled "Inverse Lieb Materials: Altermagnetism and More" (arXiv:2508.04839v2). It contains no mention of Li2PdH2, palladium, hydrides, I4/mmm, C2/m, electron-phonon coupling, McMillan-Allen-Dynes, or superconductivity. None of the numerical results, structural data, phonon calculations, or methods required to support the abstract appear anywhere in the manuscript body. The submitted document therefore does not contain the study described in its abstract.

Significance. If the abstract's predictions were correct and fully documented, this would be a modest but useful addition to the computational hydride-superconductivity literature, particularly because it attributes the weak superconductivity to Li/Pd-derived modes rather than hydrogen. However, as submitted, the manuscript provides no derivations, tables, figures, code, or reproducibility artifacts for these claims; the only computational content concerns magnetic exchange interactions in inverse-Lieb-lattice materials. The submitted text cannot be evaluated as a scientific paper on Li2PdH2 because the evidence chain from methods to results is entirely absent. The altermagnetism content may have its own merits, but it is not the manuscript's claimed subject, and no strength from the abstract can be verified from the full text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. Full Text] The central claim of the manuscript is that random structure searching and phonon calculations establish the phase boundaries and superconducting Tc values of Li2PdH2. The full text contains none of this. A search for 'Li2PdH2', 'hydride', 'Pd', 'I4/mmm', 'C2/m', 'electron-phonon', 'McMillan', or 'superconduct' returns no matches in the body. The full text is an unrelated paper on inverse Lieb lattice magnets. Thus every quantitative statement in the abstract—phase boundaries at 5 and 50 GPa, Tc from 0.6 to 4.7 K, and the alkali-metal series—lacks any supporting calculation, and the manuscript cannot be scientifically assessed.
  2. [Section III (Computational Details)] The only methods section describes OpenMX DFT calculations, Green's-function exchange couplings, and Hubbard U corrections for magnetic ILL compounds. It contains no description of random structure searching, phonon calculations, electron-phonon coupling, or McMillan-Allen-Dynes/Eliashberg theory. No Coulomb pseudopotential μ* is specified, no pseudopotential details for H or Pd are given, and no convergence criteria for the alleged structure search are provided. The reported Tc values to 0.1 K are therefore unreproducible and unverifiable from the submitted text.
  3. [Title and body identity] The paper's title and abstract refer to A2PdH2 hydrides under pressure, while the body is titled 'Inverse Lieb Materials: Altermagnetism and More' and is identified as arXiv:2508.04839v2. This is not a local omission or a minor presentation error; it is a complete mismatch between the claimed contribution and the submitted content. No part of the claimed study is present, so the manuscript's central assertion is unsupported by the submitted document.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Header/footer] The full-text header shows 'arXiv:2508.04839v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 8 Aug 2025', which is the arXiv identifier of the altermagnetism paper, not 2508.04835. This likely indicates a filing or upload error, but as submitted it makes the mismatch explicit.
  2. [Throughout] The body contains numerous OCR-type artifacts (e.g., 'N eel temperature', 'significant', 'exchange couplings') that would need correction in any eventual resubmission; these are noted only for completeness, as they are secondary to the content mismatch.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; however, the manuscript body is a different paper ('Inverse Lieb Materials: Altermagnetism and More'), so the claimed Li2PdH2 derivation is entirely absent and cannot be assessed for circularity.

full rationale

I searched the full text for 'Li2PdH2', 'Pd', 'hydride', 'I4/mmm', 'C2/m', 'superconduct', 'McMillan', 'electron-phonon', 'anharmonic', and 'random structure'. The body is titled 'Inverse Lieb Materials: Altermagnetism and More' and discusses Heisenberg-model phase diagrams, exchange couplings, and magnon spectra in inverse-Lieb-lattice magnets; none of the abstract's Li2PdH2 results, methods, or data appear in the manuscript. This is a severe missing-support / manuscript-mismatch problem: the claimed chain 'random structure searching and phonon calculations -> phase stability -> phonons -> electron-phonon coupling -> Tc' has no representation in the text. Under the hard rules, circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction of a claimed result to its inputs (self-definition, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation). Since no such derivation exists in the body, there is no equation or citation chain to reduce. The abstract also does not fit Tc to experimental data or define a target quantity in terms of an input, so no circular pattern applies. I therefore set the circularity score to 0, while explicitly flagging that the central claim is unsupported by the submitted body text; that is a completeness/integrity issue, not a circularity issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All entries are inferred from the abstract because the full text contains no A2PdH2 content. Each assumption is load-bearing for the abstract's quantitative claims and none can be checked against the submitted text.

free parameters (1)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential mu* in McMillan-Allen-Dynes / Eliashberg estimate = not stated in abstract (typical 0.10-0.16)
    Absolute Tc values in the abstract (0.6 K, 4.7 K, 3.2 K, 2.1 K) depend on this hand-chosen parameter; the abstract does not disclose it. Reported precision implies a specific choice was made.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT with GGA-PBE exchange-correlation accurately predicts the relative enthalpies and phonon stabilities of Li2PdH2 polymorphs under pressure
    The phase boundaries at 5 and 50 GPa rest on this; standard but unverified for this compound, and undocumentable in this submission because the body is a different paper.
  • domain assumption Random structure searching at the studied pressures sampled the relevant configuration space completely
    That I4/mmm and C2/m are the thermodynamically stable phases is only as strong as the search; the abstract (sentence 2) does not state how many candidate structures were generated.
  • domain assumption The Migdal-Eliashberg / McMillan-Allen-Dynes framework with an assumed mu* gives quantitatively reliable Tc for this weakly coupled system
    The headline Tc values are computed in this framework; its accuracy for these materials is assumed, and the abstract reports values to 0.1 K.
  • domain assumption Harmonic and anharmonic phonon calculations as implemented capture the lattice dynamics and the absence of superconductivity in the tetragonal phase
    The abstract explicitly mentions anharmonic effects for the tetragonal phase; the accuracy of the anharmonic treatment is an unstated premise of the negative superconductivity claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Study on A$_2$PdH$_2$: From Ambient to High Pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JTSMQZ47

@misc{pith2026250804835,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Study on A$_2$PdH$_2$: From Ambient to High Pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JTSMQZ47}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04835}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive first--principles study of the structural stability and superconducting behavior of Li$_2$PdH$_2$ under high pressure. Using random structure searching and phonon calculations, we identify a pressure--induced phase transition from a tetragonal I4/mmm structure, stable up to 5 GPa, to a monoclinic C2/m phase that remains thermodynamically stable up to 50 GPa. Superconductivity is absent in the tetragonal phase, even when anharmonic effects are considered, due to weak electron--phonon coupling and limited hydrogen involvement near the Fermi level. In contrast, the monoclinic phase exhibits a weak but pressure-enhanced superconducting transition, with Tc increasing from 0.6 K at 10 GPa to 4.7 K at 50 GPa, mainly driven by low--frequency Li and Pd-derived phonon modes. We further explore the isostructural A$_2$PdH$_2$ (A = Na, K, Rb, Cs) series to evaluate the impact of alkali-metal substitution on stability and superconductivity. Na, K, and Rb analogs retain dynamic stability at ambient pressure, with weak superconducting critical temperatures of 3.2 K, 2.1 K, and negligible Tc, respectively. Cs$_2$PdH$_2$, however, exhibits phonon instabilities, suggesting a need for external stabilization. These findings highlight the delicate balance between lattice dynamics, electronic structure, and atomic mass in tuning superconductivity in palladium-based hydrides.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the causality between affective impact and coordinated human-robot reactions

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A small robot's perceived emotional impact changes with reaction timing: about 200 ms of delay maximizes felt impact, and about 100 ms maximizes the feeling of influencing the robot.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    to describe electronic interactions in cuprate super- conductors [2]. In recent years, this lattice geometry has experienced a resurgence of interest in the context of al- termagnetism (AM) [3{5] | a novel class of collinear magnets that exhibit alternating spin polarization on symmetry-related sites, leading to distinctive transport and topological pheno...

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys- ical Review Letters 62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible high tc super- conductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 64, 189 (1986)

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Kaushal and M

    N. Kaushal and M. Franz, Altermagnetism in mod- ified Lieb lattice Hubbard model, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.16421 (2024), arXiv:2412.16421 [cond- mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    D¨ urrnagel, H

    M. D¨ urrnagel, H. Hohmann, A. Maity, J. Seufert, M. Klett, L. Klebl, and R. Thomale, Altermagnetic phase transition in a lieb metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036502 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb 2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Na- ture Reviews Materials 7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Weeks and M

    C. Weeks and M. Franz, Topological insulators on the Lieb and perovskite lattices, Physical Review B 82, 085310 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal micro- scopic model, Physical Review B 108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Sheng, S

    M. Sheng, S. Wang, H. Zhu, Z. Liu, and G. Zhou, Com- putational applications for the discovery of novel an- tiperovskites and chalcogenide perovskites: A review, Frontiers in Chemistry 12, 10.3389/fchem.2024.1468434 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Keßler, L

    P. Keßler, L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, I. I. Mazin, R. Valent ´ ı, and S. Moser, Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from µSR spectroscopy and neu- tron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Hiraishi, H

    M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, T. Muroi, D. Hirai, and Z. Hiroi, Nonmagnetic ground state in ruo2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166702 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Smolyanyuk, I

    A. Smolyanyuk, I. I. Mazin, L. Garcia-Gassull, and R. Valent ´ ı, Fragility of the magnetic order in the pro- totypical altermagnet RuO 2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134424 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Kabbour, E

    H. Kabbour, E. Janod, B. Corraze, M. Danot, C. Lee, M.-H. Whangbo, and L. Cario, Structure and Magnetic Properties of Oxychalcogenides A2F2Fe2OQ2 (A=Sr, Ba; Q=S, Se) with Fe2O Square Planar Layers Representing an Antiferromagnetic Checkerboard Spin Lattice, Jour- nal of the Am...

    2008

  12. [20]

    D. G. Free, N. D. Withers, P. J. Hickey, and J. S. O. Evans, Synthesis, Structure and Properties of Several New Oxychalcogenide Materials with the General For- mula A2O2M 2OSe2 (A=La-Sm, M =Fe, Mn), Chemistry of Materials 23, 1625 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    J. B. He, D. M. Wang, H. L. Shi, H. X. Yang, J. Q. Li, and G. F. Chen, Synthesis, structure, and magnetic prop- erties of the layered iron oxychalcogenide Na 2Fe2Se2O, Phys. Rev. B 84, 205212 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    B. C. Sheath, X. Xu, P. Manuel, J. Hadermann, M. Batuk, J. O’Sullivan, R. S. Bonilla, and S. J. Clarke, Structures and Magnetic Ordering in Layered Cr Ox- ide Arsenides Sr 2CrO2Cr2OAs2 and Sr 2CrO3CrAs, In- organic Chemistry 61, 12373 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Song, Y.-Q

    S.-J. Song, Y.-Q. Lin, B.-Z. Li, S.-Q. Wu, Q.-Q. Zhu, Z. Ren, and G.-H. Cao, Tetragonal polymorph of BaFe2S2O as an antiferromagnetic Mott insulator, Phys- ical Review Materials 6, 055002 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Y. Xiao, B. Li, Q. Duan, S. Liu, Q. Ren, Y. Lin, Y. Xia, Y. Cui, H. Jiang, S. Wei, Z. Ren, Y. Mei, Y. Sun, S. Fu, S. Tan, Q. Jing, D. Yu, Y. Chen, C. Wang, and G. Cao, ThCr2Si2C: An Antiferromagnetic Metal with a Cr 2C Square Lattice, Inorganic Chemistry 63, 211 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Y. Fuwa, M. Wakeshima, and Y. Hinatsu, Crystal struc- ture and magnetic properties of a new layered cobalt oxyselenide La2Co2O3Se2, Solid State Communications 150, 1698 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    N. Ni, E. Climent-Pascual, S. Jia, Q. Huang, and R. J. Cava, Physical properties and magnetic structure of the layered oxyselenide La2O3Mn2Se2, Physical Review B 82, 214419 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    D. G. Free and J. S. O. Evans, Low-temperature nuclear and magnetic structures of La2O2Fe2OSe2 from x-ray and neutron diffraction measurements, Physical Review B 81, 214433 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Ablimit, Y.-L

    A. Ablimit, Y.-L. Sun, E.-J. Cheng, Y.-B. Liu, S.-Q. Wu, 10 H. Jiang, Z. Ren, S. Li, and G.-H. Cao, V 2Te2O: A Two- Dimensional van der Waals Correlated Metal, Inorganic Chemistry 57, 14617 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Ablimit, Y.-L

    A. Ablimit, Y.-L. Sun, H. Jiang, S.-Q. Wu, Y.-B. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Weak metal-metal transition in the vana- dium oxytelluride Rb1−� V2Te2O, Physical Review B 97, 214517 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral Split Magnon in Altermagnetic MnTe, Physical Review Letters 133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Gohlke, A

    M. Gohlke, A. Corticelli, R. Moessner, P. A. McClarty, and A. Mook, Spurious Symmetry Enhancement in Lin- ear Spin Wave Theory and Interaction-Induced Topology in Magnons, Physical Review Letters131, 186702 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    C.-C. Wei, X. Li, S. Hatt, X. Huai, J. Liu, B. Singh, K.-M. Kim, R. M. Fernandes, P. Cardon, L. Zhao, T. T. Tran, B. A. Frandsen, K. S. Burch, F. Liu, and H. Ji, La2O3Mn2Se2: A correlated insulating layered d -wave al- termagnet, Physical Review Materials 9, 024402 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Y. Fuwa, T. Endo, M. Wakeshima, Y. Hinatsu, and K. Ohoyama, Orthogonal Spin Arrangement in Quasi- Two-Dimensional La 2Co2O3Se2, Journal of the Ameri- can Chemical Society 132, 18020 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    G¨ unther, S

    M. G¨ unther, S. Kamusella, R. Sarkar, T. Goltz, H. Luetkens, G. Pascua, S.-H. Do, K.-Y. Choi, H. D. Zhou, C. G. F. Blum, S. Wurmehl, B. B¨ uchner, and H.- H. Klauss, Magnetic order and spin dynamics in La 2 O 2 Fe 2 OSe 2 probed by Fe 57 M¨ ossbauer, La 139 NMR, and muon-spin...

    2014

  28. [36]

    H. Lin, J. Si, X. Zhu, K. Cai, H. Li, L. Kong, X. Yu, and H.-H. Wen, Structure and physical properties of CsV 2 Se 2 - x O and V 2 Se 2 O, Physical Review B 98, 075132 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, Discovery of a metal- lic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet KV2Se2O, Na- ture Physics 21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Ozaki, Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures, Phys

    T. Ozaki, Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures, Phys. Rev. B 67, 155108 (2003)

    2003

  31. [39]

    OpenMX, The code OPENMX pseudoatomic basis func- tions, and pseudopotentials are available under terms of the GNU-GPL on a web site, http://www.openmx- square.org/

  32. [40]

    Morrison, D

    I. Morrison, D. M. Bylander, and L. Kleinman, Nonlocal Hermitian norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotential, Physical Review B 47, 6728 (1993)

    1993

  33. [41]

    Vanderbilt, Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism, Physical Review B 41, 7892 (1990)

    D. Vanderbilt, Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism, Physical Review B 41, 7892 (1990)

    1990

  34. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Or- bital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators, Physical Re- view B 52, R5467 (1995)

    1995

  36. [44]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Physical Review B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    Antropov, M

    V. Antropov, M. Katsnelson, and A. Liechtenstein, Ex- change interactions in magnets, Physica B: Condensed Matter 237–238, 336 (1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    M. I. Katsnelson and A. I. Lichtenstein, First-principles calculations of magnetic interactions in correlated sys- tems, Physical Review B 61, 8906 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Terasawa, M

    A. Terasawa, M. Matsumoto, T. Ozaki, and Y. Gohda, Efficient Algorithm Based on Liechtenstein Method for Computing Exchange Coupling Constants Using Local- ized Basis Set, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 88, 114706 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    M. J. Han, T. Ozaki, and J. Yu, Electronic structure, magnetic interactions, and the role of ligands in mn � (n = 4 , 12) single-molecule magnets, Phys. Rev. B 70, 184421 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    J.-X. Zhu, R. Yu, H. Wang, L. L. Zhao, M. D. Jones, J. Dai, E. Abrahams, E. Morosan, M. Fang, and Q. Si, Band Narrowing and Mott Localization in Iron Oxy- chalcogenides La2O2Fe2O(Se,S)2, Physical Review Let- ters 104, 216405 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    E. E. McCabe, C. Stock, E. E. Rodriguez, A. S. Wills, J. W. Taylor, and J. S. O. Evans, Weak spin interactions in Mott insulating La2O2Fe2OSe2, Physical Review B 89, 100402 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Freelon, Z

    B. Freelon, Z. Yamani, I. Swainson, R. Flacau, B. Karki, Y. H. Liu, L. Craco, M. S. Laad, M. Wang, J. Chen, R. J. Birgeneau, and M. Fang, Magnetic and structural properties of the iron oxychalcogenides La2O2Fe2OM2 ( M=S, Se), Physical Review B 99, 024109 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    I. A. Zaliznyak, Z. Xu, J. M. Tranquada, G. Gu, A. M. Tsvelik, and M. B. Stone, Unconventional temperature enhanced magnetism in Fe 1�1Te, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 216403 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    Suetin, I

    D. Suetin, I. Shein, and A. Ivanovskii, Electronic, mag- netic properties and correlation effects in the layered qua- ternary iron oxyselenide Na2Fe2Se2O from first princi- ples, Solid State Communications 152, 1969 (2012)

    1969

  46. [54]

    J. K. Glasbrenner, I. I. Mazin, H. O. Jeschke, P. J. Hirschfeld, R. M. Fernandes, and R. Valent ´ ı, Effect of magnetic frustration on nematicity and superconductiv- ity in iron chalcogenides, Nat. Phys. 11, 953 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    A. L. Wysocki, K. D. Belashchenko, and V. P. Antropov, Consistent model of magnetism in ferropnictides, Nat. Phys. 7, 485 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Ducatman, N

    S. Ducatman, N. B. Perkins, and A. Chubukov, Mag- netism in parent iron chalcogenides: Quantum fluctua- tions select plaquette order, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 157206 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    D. W. Tam, H.-H. Lai, J. Hu, X. Lu, H. C. Walker, D. L. Abernathy, J. L. Niedziela, T. Weber, M. Enderle, Y. Su, Z. Q. Mao, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Plaquette instability com- peting with bicollinear ground state in detwinned fete, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054405 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Y.-X. Yu, High storage capacity and small volume change of potassium-intercalation into novel vanadium oxy- chalcogenide monolayers V2S2O, V2Se2O and V2Te2O: An ab initio DFT investigation, Applied Surface Science 546, 149062 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with 11 giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Na- ture Communications 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature...

    2025

  53. [61]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nature Physics 21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V

    R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V. K. Bharadwaj, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Supercell altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094425 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Garcia-Gassull, A

    L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Razpopov, P. P. Stavropou- los, I. I. Mazin, and R. Valent ´ ı, Microscopic ori- gin of the magnetic interactions and their experimen- tal signatures in altermagnetic La 2O3Mn2Se2, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.21661 (2025), arXiv:2506.21661 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.