REVIEW 3 cited by
A Redefinition of the Halo Boundary Leads to a Simple yet Accurate Halo Model of Large Scale Structure
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present a model for the halo--mass correlation function that explicitly incorporates halo exclusion. We assume that halos trace mass in a way that can be described using a single scale-independent bias parameter. However, our model exhibits scale dependent biasing due to the impact of halo-exclusion, the use of a ``soft'' (i.e. not infinitely sharp) halo boundary, and differences in the one halo term contributions to $\xi_{\rm hm}$ and $\xi_{\rm mm}$. These features naturally lead us to a redefinition of the halo boundary that lies at the ``by eye'' transition radius from the one--halo to the two--halo term in the halo--mass correlation function. When adopting our proposed definition, our model succeeds in describing the halo--mass correlation function with $\approx 2\%$ residuals over the radial range $0.1\ h^{-1}{\rm Mpc} < r < 80\ h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$, and for halo masses in the range $10^{13}\ h^{-1}{\rm M}_{\odot} < M < 10^{15}\ h^{-1}{\rm M}_{\odot}$. Our proposed halo boundary is related to the splashback radius by a roughly constant multiplicative factor. Taking the 87-percentile as reference we find $r_{\rm t}/R_{\rm sp} \approx 1.3$. Surprisingly, our proposed definition results in halo abundances that are well described by the Press-Schechter mass function with $\delta_{\rm sc}=1.449\pm 0.004$. The clustering bias parameter is offset from the standard background-split prediction by $\approx 10\%-15\%$. This level of agreement is comparable to that achieved with more standard halo definitions.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Anisotropic Secondary Bias of Dark Matter Haloes in a $\Lambda$CDM Universe
Halo spin and elongation create a direction-dependent clustering signal that is governed by alignment with the surrounding cosmic web, whereas orientation-averaged secondary bias is governed by tidal anisotropy.
-
Baryonification II: Constraining feedback with X-ray and kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich observations
ACT kSZ and eROSITA gas fractions are mutually consistent in a baryonification fit and imply strong feedback, with predicted matter power suppression reaching 20-25 percent at k=5 h/Mpc.
-
The Density Profile of Dynamical Halos
For dynamical dark matter halos, the orbiting density profile at fixed mass is set by one scale, the halo radius, whose scatter shrinks from 16% to 11% when formation time is included.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.