Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Room-temperature THz resistance maps can predict superconducting kinetic inductance variations across a wafer, enabling pre-lithography screening of NbTiN films.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 22:24 UTC pith:K5SO5KWM

load-bearing objection Room-temperature wafer-scale Rs mapping is a solid new screening tool; the Lk-Rs correlation is suggestive but underpowered with n=3 and no error bars. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15757 v1 pith:K5SO5KWM submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.supr-con

Contactless terahertz mapping of wafer-scale superconducting NbTiN thin films

Yayi Lin , Marc Neis , Marcello Pio Guardascione , Janine Lorenz , Thomas J. Smart , F. Stefan Tautz , Felix L\"upke , Frederik Bolle
show 4 more authors
Martin Dressel Rami Barends Pavel A. Bushev Marc Scheffler
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords terahertz spectroscopyNbTiN thin filmswafer-scale mappingsheet resistancekinetic inductancesuperconducting homogeneitynon-destructive screeningMattis-Bardeen theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Wafer-scale superconducting quantum devices need uniform films, but checking that uniformity usually requires fabricating test structures and cooling them. This paper claims a faster route: a room-temperature, contactless terahertz map of the film's sheet resistance can stand in for a low-temperature map of the superconducting kinetic inductance. On ten NbTiN wafers, the authors show that percentage deviations in sheet resistance across a wafer depend on deposition tool and film thickness, and, on one wafer, that deviations in the extracted zero-temperature kinetic inductance track the sheet-resistance deviations. If the link holds, THz screening before lithography could predict where kinetic-inductance-sensitive devices will under- or over-perform, letting designers compensate or discard off-spec material.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the spatial variation of the superconducting sheet kinetic inductance Lk0 in NbTiN films is mirrored by the spatial variation of the normal-state sheet resistance Rs measured at room temperature. Using THz frequency-domain spectroscopy to map entire wafers and THz time-domain spectroscopy on three diced pieces, the authors find δLk0 ≈ δRs, with critical temperature and energy gap nearly constant. This is consistent with the dirty-limit Mattis-Bardeen relation Lk ∝ Rs/Δ0, so when Δ0 is uniform, the resistance map alone predicts the inductance landscape. The work also quantifies how film homogeneity degrades for thicknesses below about 30 nm and how it differs betwee

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the relation Lk ∝ Rs/Δ0 from Mattis-Bardeen theory in the dirty limit, where Lk is sheet kinetic inductance, Rs is normal-state sheet resistance, and Δ0 is the zero-temperature superconducting gap. The mapping tool is THz frequency-domain spectroscopy, which extracts local Rs from the Fabry-Perot oscillations of THz transmission at each grid spot without contacting the film; low-temperature THz time-domain spectroscopy then gives Lk0 through fits to the optical conductivity. Because the paper finds Δ0 uniform across the wafer, the room-temperature Rs map becomes a direct proxy for the Lk0 map.

Load-bearing premise

The predictive link rests on the assumption that the kinetic inductance values extracted at just three positions on one wafer, with no reported error bars, accurately capture the same few-percent variations the room-temperature map reports.

What would settle it

Measure Lk0 at a dense grid of more than a dozen positions across a wafer using THz-TDS or resonator arrays and compare each value to the room-temperature Rs map; if the deviations do not track each other within the measurement uncertainty, or if Lk0 scatter is comparable to the claimed variation, the central prediction is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single room-temperature THz scan can serve as a pre-lithography quality gate, flagging positions where kinetic inductance deviates before any device is fabricated.
  • Kinetic-inductance-sensitive circuits (resonators, amplifiers, detectors) could be laid out to avoid or compensate for off-spec regions on the wafer.
  • The thickness and deposition-tool dependence of homogeneity provides quantitative feedback for sputter process development.
  • The same approach may be used on other superconducting films if their energy gap is known to be spatially uniform.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A denser low-temperature sampling (dozens of positions, perhaps via arrays of microwave resonators) would test whether the δLk0 ≈ δRs correspondence holds at the few-percent level or only roughly.
  • If the correspondence holds, a natural extension is to feed room-temperature THz maps into an automated 'kinetic inductance correction map' used during circuit layout.
  • The technique might also be applied inline after deposition steps, turning wafer mapping into a routine process-monitoring tool.
  • For films where the gap is not uniform (e.g., strongly disordered superconductors), the simple proxy breaks down and a two-dimensional (Rs, Δ0) map would be needed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates room-temperature wafer-scale mapping of the sheet resistance of superconducting NbTiN thin films using THz frequency-domain spectroscopy (THz-FDS), applied to ten 4-inch and 6-inch wafers grown under different conditions. It reports that the spatial homogeneity of Rs depends on the deposition device and film thickness, with a clear trend toward larger deviations for thinner films. For one wafer (wD), three diced pieces (D1, D3, D5) are characterized at cryogenic temperatures by THz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) and transport. From these data, the authors extract the critical temperature, the superconducting energy gap, and the sheet kinetic inductance Lk0, and claim that the deviations in Lk0 match those of the normal-state sheet resistance, suggesting that room-temperature Rs maps could serve as a pre-lithography screening tool for superconducting device fabrication.

Significance. If the central correlation between δLk0 and δRs were firmly established, the work would offer a fast, contactless, wafer-scale screening method that is genuinely useful for superconducting quantum technology and detector fabrication. The room-temperature THz-FDS mapping itself is a solid technical contribution: it covers ten wafers, includes an on-wafer vs. post-dicing consistency check (Fig. 1c), and demonstrates a plausible thickness dependence of Rs homogeneity. The low-temperature THz-TDS data on NbTiN are also valuable as a reference set. However, the main claim—that deviations in superconducting kinetic inductance can be predicted from normal-state sheet resistance—rests on only three samples from a single wafer, with no reported uncertainties on the extracted Lk0 values. The theoretical dirty-limit relation Lk ∝ Rs/Δ0 is used as a consistency argument, but the experimental validation remains statistically thin. The paper's significance therefore depends on whether this correlation can be supported by more data and error analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III-B, Fig. 5(c)–(f)] The central claim that δLk0 matches δRs is based on only three samples (D1, D3, D5) from wafer wD, and no error bars or uncertainties are given for the extracted Lk0 values. The text itself notes that the deviation is 'especially D5', indicating that the correlation is driven by a single point. With n=3, the result cannot be statistically distinguished from scatter. Please provide per-point uncertainties for Lk0 (including propagation of fitting parameters) and, if possible, additional positions or a repeated measurement to establish the correlation. Without this, the predictive claim is not supported.
  2. [Section III-B, Eqs. (4)–(6)] The zero-temperature kinetic inductance Lk0 is obtained through a multi-step model-dependent chain: THz-TDS transmission and Tinkham formula (Eq. 1), Mattis-Bardeen fit of σ2, extrapolation to ν→0 (Eq. 4), the relation Lk = m/(ns e² d) (Eq. 5), and a two-fluid fit with (T/Tc)⁴ (Eq. 6). Each step introduces potential systematic errors—e.g., the assumption Δd = 0 in Eq. (1), the choice of fitting range, and the extrapolation of σ2 to zero frequency. These systematic uncertainties are not quantified. A sensitivity analysis (e.g., varying the fit range or the two-fluid exponent) is needed to determine whether the few-percent differences in Lk0 are meaningful.
  3. [Section III-B, paragraph after Fig. 5] The paper uses the dirty-limit Mattis-Bardeen relation Lk ∝ Rs/Δ0 to argue that δLk0 should equal δRs when Δ0 is uniform. This is an external consistency check, not an empirical validation of the correlation. The independent evidence for the correlation is the three data points in Fig. 5(f). To strengthen the claim, the authors should directly compare the measured δLk0 with the value predicted from the room-temperature δRs map, including uncertainties, and ideally test this on a second wafer.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'the deviations in observed sheet resistance depend on the used deposition device' could be more idiomatic: 'depend on the deposition device'.
  2. [Section II, Fig. 1 caption] There is a typo: 'use a the spatial step' should be 'use a spatial step'.
  3. [Section III-A] In the sentence 'which increase the film homogeneity', the verb should agree with 'grains grow and overlap'—use 'increase' (plural) or rephrase.
  4. [Section II, Eq. (1)] The symbols m and e in Eq. (4) are not defined; please define them or refer to a standard source.
  5. [Section III-A, Eq. (2)] The deviation δRs is defined relative to the center value Rs,(0,0), but Table I reports an average Rs. Clarify which reference is used for the histograms in Fig. 3 and whether the standard deviation is affected by this choice.
  6. [Fig. 5] The inset of Fig. 5(c) shows Lk0 values in pH/sq, but the main panel label is 'Lk (pH/sq)'. Ensure the inset is clearly identified as the zero-temperature value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Rs map and Lk0 are separate THz measurements, and the Rs–Lk relation is an external dirty-limit MB result, though validation rests on only three samples.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. Room-temperature sheet resistance is obtained from THz-FDS transmission fitted with a Drude model, while the superconducting sheet kinetic inductance Lk0 is independently extracted from low-temperature THz-TDS spectra via the Tinkham formula, Mattis-Bardeen fits of sigma1 and sigma2, extrapolation to zero frequency, and a two-fluid temperature fit. No equation in the paper feeds the room-temperature Rs map into the low-temperature fits. The proportionality Lk proportional to Rs/Delta0 is an external dirty-limit Mattis-Bardeen result, invoked to explain the observed delta-Lk0 versus delta-Rs pattern after the fact; it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations [39] and [40] are used for standard THz and conductivity formulas and do not carry load-bearing uniqueness or existence claims. The main weakness is statistical: only three diced samples are compared, no uncertainties are reported for the extracted Lk0 values, and the text notes the correlation is 'especially D5'. That is an evidence-quality issue, not a circularity. The claimed match is therefore a consistency check between two independent measurements within a shared theoretical framework, not a reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard thin-film THz spectroscopy models (Tinkham, Drude, Mattis-Bardeen, two-fluid) and on the assumption that the nominal film thickness is exact. No new entities are introduced. The main free parameters are the standard physical fitting parameters (gap and kinetic inductance), not ad hoc additions.

free parameters (2)
  • 2Δ0 (zero-temperature superconducting energy gap) = approximately 32 cm^-1, varies per sample (inset Fig. 5(b))
    Extracted by fitting the temperature-dependent 2Δ(T) data to Eq. (3) with 2Δ0 as the only parameter.
  • Lk0 (zero-temperature sheet kinetic inductance) = approximately 2.8-3.2 pH/sq (inset Fig. 5(c))
    Extracted by fitting Lk(T) to the two-fluid model, Eq. (6).
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Tinkham thin-film formula Eq. (1) with Δd = 0
    Used to convert THz transmission to optical conductivity; any substrate thickness mismatch between sample and reference adds phase error (stated in Sec. II).
  • domain assumption Drude model with scattering rate much larger than the THz probe frequencies (9-10.5 cm^-1)
    Used in Sec. III-A to extract sheet resistance from the Fabry-Perot oscillations; requires the Drude scattering rate to be far above the measured range.
  • domain assumption Mattis-Bardeen theory in the dirty limit describes the THz conductivity of NbTiN
    Used in Sec. III-B to fit σ1 and σ2 with 2Δ as the only parameter; requires the film to be a dirty s-wave BCS superconductor.
  • domain assumption Eq. (4) n_s = 2πmc/e² lim_{ν→0} νσ2(ν) with free electron mass m
    Used to compute superfluid density and kinetic inductance; in a strongly disordered material the effective mass is not well defined, but the ratio in Eq. (5) may still describe kinetic inductance.
  • domain assumption Eq. (3) BCS-like temperature dependence 2Δ(T)=2Δ0 sqrt(cos(π/2 (T/Tc)^2))
    Used to extract 2Δ0; this is an empirical BCS interpolation, not a derivation for NbTiN.
  • domain assumption Two-fluid model Lk(T)=Lk0/(1-(T/Tc)^4)
    Used to extract Lk0; may not hold for strongly disordered superconductors.
  • domain assumption Film thickness d is uniform and known for each wafer
    Used in Eqs. (1) and (5); nonuniform d would appear as Rs or Lk variation and could mislead the correlation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13193 in / 14472 out tokens · 118698 ms · 2026-08-01T22:24:41.794629+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

For large-scale superconducting quantum technology, e.g. quantum computing, the homogeneity of wafer-scale superconducting thin films is vital for consistent performance of the fabricated devices. Terahertz (THz) spectroscopy as a contactless and non-destructive measurement technique is a powerful tool to characterize the superconducting films. In this work, a set of niobium titanium nitride (NbTiN) thin films on 4-inch and 6-inch silicon wafers, grown via plasma-enhanced magnetron sputtering, are investigated via THz spectroscopy: full wafers are mapped at room temperatures and exemplary segments are characterized at cryogenic temperatures. The deviations in observed sheet resistance depend on the used deposition device and the film thickness. While the deviations in superconducting sheet kinetic inductance match those of the normal-state sheet resistance, the critical temperature and energy gap exhibit little variation. This THz mapping technique demonstrates the feasibility of evaluating wafer-scale superconducting thin films before lithography, facilitating preparation of the thin films for reproducible device fabrication.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15757 by Felix L\"upke, Frederik Bolle, F. Stefan Tautz, Janine Lorenz, Marcello Pio Guardascione, Marc Neis, Marc Scheffler, Martin Dressel, Pavel A. Bushev, Rami Barends, Thomas J. Smart, Yayi Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of room-temperature mapping in THz-FDS. (a) THz-FDS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Percentage Rs deviation wafer-scale maps of (a) one 6-inch wafer wF and (b–h) seven 4-inch wafers wH–wN with different NbTiN film thicknesses between 60 nm to 5 nm. The deviations of Rs are indicated with respect to the center of each wafer. are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a–j) The δRs histograms of the wafers shown in Table I. The solid lines are Gaussian fits and the fit width represents the standard deviation (Std.) of δRs. In (c), the red histogram and black line indicate the δRs across the full 6-inch wafer wF, while the cyan histogram and blue line concern the smaller, center 4-inch area of the same wafer wF. (k, l) is the Std. obtained from the Gaussian fit. (k) is t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of THz-TDS measurements. (a) THz-TDS setup with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of superconducting properties between samples D1 (black), D3 (red) and D5 (blue). (a) DC transport measurements of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Simulating physics with computers,

    R. P. Feynman, “Simulating physics with computers,”Int. J. Theor. Phys., vol. 21, no. 6-7, pp. 467–488, 1982

    1982

  2. [2]

    Quantum hardware devices (QHDs): opportunities and challenges,

    A. Oukaira, “Quantum hardware devices (QHDs): opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buellet al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,”Nature, vol. 574, no. 7779, pp. 505–510, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    Quantum computers,

    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y . Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, “Quantum computers,”Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 45–53, 2010. 6 (b) (e) (c) (f) (a) (d) 13.6 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.4 0 10 20 30 -4 -2 0 2 4 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.9 Temperature (K) Rs, DC (/sq) D3 D1 Tc(K) Position y (cm) D5 -4 -2 0 2 4 0 5 10 Tc (%) Position y (cm) -4 -2 0 2 4 0...

    2010

  5. [5]

    Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware,

    N. P. De Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, “Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware,”Science, vol. 372, no. 6539, p. eabb2823, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer,

    T. Graham, Y . Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phuttitarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinkemeyeret al., “Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer,”Nature, vol. 604, no. 7906, pp. 457–462, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Progress in trapped-ion quantum simulation,

    M. Foss-Feig, G. Pagano, A. C. Potter, and N. Y . Yao, “Progress in trapped-ion quantum simulation,”Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 145–172, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Recent progress towards large-scale integrated photonic quantum computation,

    H. Zhu, T. Chen, H. Ma, Z. Zhao, J. Guo, Q. Liang, Y . Tu, T. He, W. Luo, B. Wanget al., “Recent progress towards large-scale integrated photonic quantum computation,”npj Nanophoton., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 20, 2026

    2026

  9. [9]

    A crossbar chip for benchmarking semiconductor spin qubits,

    A. Tosato, A. Elsayed, F. Poggiali, L. E. A. Stehouwer, D. Costa, K. L. Hudson, D. Degli Esposti, and G. Scappucci, “A crossbar chip for benchmarking semiconductor spin qubits,”Nat. Electron., pp. 1–10, 2026

    2026

  10. [10]

    Superconducting qubits: Current state of play,

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braum ¨uller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “Superconducting qubits: Current state of play,”Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 369–395, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Implementing qubits with super- conducting integrated circuits,

    M. H. Devoret and J. M. Martinis, “Implementing qubits with super- conducting integrated circuits,”Quantum Inf. Process., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 163–203, 2004

    2004

  12. [12]

    Superconducting quantum bits,

    J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, “Superconducting quantum bits,”Nature, vol. 453, no. 7198, pp. 1031–1042, 2008

    2008

  13. [13]

    Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review,

    G. Wendin, “Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review,”Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 80, no. 10, p. 106001, 2017

    2017

  14. [14]

    A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,” Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, 2019

    2019

  15. [15]

    Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits,

    I. Siddiqi, “Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits,”Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 875–891, 2021

    2021

  16. [16]

    Superconducting quantum computers: who is leading the future?

    M. AbuGhanem, “Superconducting quantum computers: who is leading the future?”EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 102, 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Advancements in superconducting quantum computing,

    Y .-Y . Jiang, C. Deng, H. Fan, B.-Y . Li, L. Sun, X.-S. Tan, W. Wang, G.-M. Xue, F. Yan, H.-F. Yuet al., “Advancements in superconducting quantum computing,”Nat. Sci. Rev., vol. 12, no. 8, p. nwaf246, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,

    C. Macklin, K. O’brien, D. Hover, M. Schwartz, V . Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, “A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,”Science, vol. 350, no. 6258, pp. 307–310, 2015

    2015

  19. [19]

    Perspective on traveling wave microwave parametric amplifiers,

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, and N. Roch, “Perspective on traveling wave microwave parametric amplifiers,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 119, no. 12, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    Demonstration of a quantum noise limited traveling-wave parametric amplifier,

    N. Klimovich, P. Day, S. Shu, B. H. Eom, H. Leduc, and A. Beyer, “Demonstration of a quantum noise limited traveling-wave parametric amplifier,”arXiv:2306.11028, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Wiring up quantum systems,

    R. Schoelkopf and S. Girvin, “Wiring up quantum systems,”Nature, vol. 451, no. 7179, pp. 664–669, 2008

    2008

  22. [22]

    Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers,

    J. Van Damme, S. Massar, R. Acharya, T. Ivanov, D. Perez Lozano, Y . Canvel, M. Demarets, D. Vangoidsenhoven, Y . Hermans, J. Laiet al., “Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers,”Nature, vol. 634, no. 8032, pp. 74–79, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Gate-controlled superconductivity and quantum interference in 300 mm CMOS-compatible ZrN nanostructures,

    R. Potjan, O. Ostien, M. Wislicenus, R. Hoffmann, K. Lilienthal, K. Heidner, F. Mende, S. Liberda, A. Reck, V . Brackmann, B. Lilienthal- Uhlig, and J. Wosnitza, “Gate-controlled superconductivity and quantum interference in 300 mm CMOS-compatible ZrN nanostructures,”APL Mater., vol. 13, no. 5, p. 051103, 05 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays,

    P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, B. A. Mazin, A. Vayonakis, and J. Zmuidzinas, “A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6960, pp. 817–821, 2003

    2003

  25. [25]

    Ultra-sensitive THz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes,

    J. Baselmans, F. Facchin, A. P. Laguna, J. Bueno, D. Thoen, V . Mu- rugesan, N. Llombart, and P. De Visser, “Ultra-sensitive THz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes,”Astron. Astro- phys., vol. 665, p. A17, 2022

    2022

  26. [26]

    Anomalous response of superconducting titanium nitride resonators to terahertz radiation,

    J. Bueno, P. C. J. J. Coumou, G. Zheng, P. J. de Visser, T. M. Klapwijk, E. F. C. Driessen, S. Doyle, and J. J. A. Baselmans, “Anomalous response of superconducting titanium nitride resonators to terahertz radiation,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 105, no. 19, p. 192601, 11 2014

    2014

  27. [27]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications,

    I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. Chang, J. W. Los, S. Gyger, A. W. Elshaari, S. Stein- hauer, S. N. Dorenbos, and V . Zwiller, “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 118, no. 19, 2021

    2021

  28. [28]

    Visualizing local superconductivity of nbtin nanowires to probe inhomogeneity in single- photon detectors,

    P.-J. Chen, G.-H. Chen, R. Vedin, M. J ¨onsson, S. Gyger, S. Steinhauer, J.-J. Lin, W.-H. Chang, J. Lidmar, V . Zwilleret al., “Visualizing local superconductivity of nbtin nanowires to probe inhomogeneity in single- photon detectors,”ACS Appl. Opt. Mater., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Wafer-scale MgB 2 superconducting devices,

    C. Kim, C. Bell, J. M. Evans, J. Greenfield, E. Batson, K. K. Berggren, N. S. Lewis, and D. P. Cunnane, “Wafer-scale MgB 2 superconducting devices,”ACS Nano, vol. 18, no. 40, pp. 27 782–27 792, 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Review of 2D superconductivity: the ultimate case of epitaxial monolayers,

    C. Brun, T. Cren, and D. Roditchev, “Review of 2D superconductivity: the ultimate case of epitaxial monolayers,”Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 30, no. 1, p. 013003, 2017

    2017

  31. [31]

    Wafer-scale characterization of a superconductor integrated circuit fabrication process, using a cryogenic wafer prober,

    J. T. West, A. Kurlej, A. Wynn, C. Rogers, M. A. Gouker, and S. K. Tolpygo, “Wafer-scale characterization of a superconductor integrated circuit fabrication process, using a cryogenic wafer prober,”IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 2022. 7

    2022

  32. [32]

    Growth and characterization of high-quality FeSe thin films on SrTiO3 with enhanced superconductivity,

    Z. Zhao, Z. Wei, X. Yu, W. Dong, J. Huang, C. Chen, Z. Feng, M. Qin, X. Wang, S. Caoet al., “Growth and characterization of high-quality FeSe thin films on SrTiO3 with enhanced superconductivity,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 110, no. 14, p. L140507, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Spatial homogeneity of superconducting order parameter in NbN films grown by atomic layer deposition,

    J. Lorenz, S. Linzen, M. Ziegler, G. Oelsner, R. Stolz, F. S. Tautz, F. L¨upke, and E. Il’ichev, “Spatial homogeneity of superconducting order parameter in NbN films grown by atomic layer deposition,”Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 39, no. 6, p. 065011, jun 2026

    2026

  34. [34]

    Characterization of NbTiN thin films prepared by reactive DC-magnetron sputtering,

    T. Matsunaga, H. Maezawa, and T. Noguchi, “Characterization of NbTiN thin films prepared by reactive DC-magnetron sputtering,”IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 3284–3287, 2003

    2003

  35. [35]

    Loss mechanisms in superconducting thin film microwave resonators,

    J. Goetz, F. Deppe, M. Haeberlein, F. Wulschner, C. W. Zollitsch, S. Meier, M. Fischer, P. Eder, E. Xie, K. G. Fedorovet al., “Loss mechanisms in superconducting thin film microwave resonators,”J. Appl. Phys., vol. 119, no. 1, 2016

    2016

  36. [36]

    Thermal reconstruction as a method of substrate preparation for highly crystalline superconducting TiN resonators,

    T. J. Smart, M. Neis, J. Lorenz, M. P. Guardascione, R. Hanna, M. Schleenvoigt, Y . Gao, J. Domnick, B. Bennemann, A. R. Jalilet al., “Thermal reconstruction as a method of substrate preparation for highly crystalline superconducting TiN resonators,”arXiv:2606.20317, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Superconducting NbTin Thin Films With Highly Uniform Properties Over a∅100 mm Wafer,

    D. J. Thoen, B. G. C. Bos, E. A. F. Haalebos, T. M. Klapwijk, J. J. A. Baselmans, and A. Endo, “Superconducting NbTin Thin Films With Highly Uniform Properties Over a∅100 mm Wafer,”IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2017

    2017

  38. [38]

    Direct observation of the superconducting energy gap developing in the conductivity spectra of niobium,

    A. V . Pronin, M. Dressel, A. Pimenov, A. Loidl, I. V . Roshchin, and L. H. Greene, “Direct observation of the superconducting energy gap developing in the conductivity spectra of niobium,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 57, pp. 14 416–14 421, Jun 1998

    1998

  39. [39]

    Electrodynam- ics of the superconducting state in ultra-thin films at THz frequencies,

    U. S. Pracht, E. Heintze, C. Clauss, D. Hafner, R. Bek, D. Werner, S. Gelhorn, M. Scheffler, M. Dressel, D. Shermanet al., “Electrodynam- ics of the superconducting state in ultra-thin films at THz frequencies,” IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 269–280, 2013

    2013

  40. [40]

    Enhanced Cooper pairing versus suppressed phase coherence shaping the superconducting dome in coupled aluminum nanograins,

    U. S. Pracht, N. Bachar, L. Benfatto, G. Deutscher, E. Farber, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, “Enhanced Cooper pairing versus suppressed phase coherence shaping the superconducting dome in coupled aluminum nanograins,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 93, no. 10, p. 100503, 2016

    2016

  41. [41]

    THz electrodynamics and superconducting energy scales of ZrN thin films,

    O. Saritas, F. Bolle, Y . Lin, M. Dressel, R. Potjan, M. Wislicenus, A. Reck, and M. Scheffler, “THz electrodynamics and superconducting energy scales of ZrN thin films,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 127, no. 19, 2025

    2025

  42. [42]

    Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging–Modern techniques and applications,

    P. U. Jepsen, D. G. Cooke, and M. Koch, “Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging–Modern techniques and applications,”Laser Photon. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 124–166, 2011

    2011

  43. [43]

    A review of the terahertz conductivity of bulk and nano-materials,

    J. Lloyd-Hughes and T.-I. Jeon, “A review of the terahertz conductivity of bulk and nano-materials,”J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 871–925, 2012

    2012

  44. [44]

    Gapless superconductivity in Nb thin films probed by terahertz spectroscopy,

    J. E. Lee, J. Choi, T. S. Jung, J. H. Kim, Y . J. Choi, K. I. Sim, Y . Jo, and J. H. Kim, “Gapless superconductivity in Nb thin films probed by terahertz spectroscopy,”Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2737, 2023

    2023

  45. [45]

    Low-temperature THz imaging of thin high-temperature superconductor films,

    M. Brucherseifer, A. Meltzow-Altmeyer, P. H. Bolivar, H. Kurz, and P. Seidel, “Low-temperature THz imaging of thin high-temperature superconductor films,”Phys. C Supercond., vol. 399, no. 1-2, pp. 53–60, 2003

    2003

  46. [46]

    Pair-breaking effects and coherence peak in the terahertz conductivity of superconducting BaFe 2−2xCo2xAs2 thin films,

    R. Vald ´es Aguilar, L. S. Bilbro, S. Lee, C. W. Bark, J. Jiang, J. D. Weiss, E. E. Hellstrom, D. C. Larbalestier, C. B. Eom, and N. P. Armitage, “Pair-breaking effects and coherence peak in the terahertz conductivity of superconducting BaFe 2−2xCo2xAs2 thin films,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 82, p. 180514(R), Nov 2010

    2010

  47. [47]

    Characterization of Microwave Properties of Superconducting NbTiN Films Using TDS,

    F. V . Khan, E. S. Zhukova, B. P. Gorshunov, L. S. Kadyrov, A. M. Chekushkin, A. V . Khudchenko, and V . P. Koshelets, “Characterization of Microwave Properties of Superconducting NbTiN Films Using TDS,” IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 627–632, 2023

    2023

  48. [48]

    Strongly Disordered TiN and NbTiNs-Wave Superconductors Probed by Microwave Electrodynamics,

    E. F. C. Driessen, P. C. J. J. Coumou, R. R. Tromp, P. J. de Visser, and T. M. Klapwijk, “Strongly Disordered TiN and NbTiNs-Wave Superconductors Probed by Microwave Electrodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, p. 107003, Sep 2012

    2012

  49. [49]

    Terahertz electrodynamics and superconducting energy gap of NbTiN,

    T. Hong, K. Choi, K. Ik Sim, T. Ha, B. Cheol Park, H. Yamamori, and J. Hoon Kim, “Terahertz electrodynamics and superconducting energy gap of NbTiN,”J. Appl. Phys., vol. 114, no. 24, 2013

    2013

  50. [50]

    Reactive Magnetron Sputter Deposition of Superconducting Niobium Titanium Nitride Thin Films With Different Target Sizes,

    B. G. C. Bos, D. J. Thoen, E. A. F. Haalebos, P. M. L. Gimbel, T. M. Klapwijk, J. J. A. Baselmans, and A. Endo, “Reactive Magnetron Sputter Deposition of Superconducting Niobium Titanium Nitride Thin Films With Different Target Sizes,”IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2017

    2017

  51. [51]

    Influence of growth parameters on the superconducting transition temperature in granular aluminum films,

    A. Deshpande, J. Pusskeiler, C. Prange, U. Rogge, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, “Influence of growth parameters on the superconducting transition temperature in granular aluminum films,”Phys. C: Supercond. Appl., vol. 634, p. 1354709, 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    Signatures of Dynes super- conductivity in the THz response of ALD-grown NbN thin films,

    F. Bolle, Y . Lin, O. Saritas, M. Dressel, C. Padurariu, S. V . Vegesna, N. Yerra, H. Kr ¨uger, and M. Scheffler, “Signatures of Dynes super- conductivity in the THz response of ALD-grown NbN thin films,” arXiv:2602.15003, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Tutorial: An introduction to terahertz time domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS),

    J. Neu and C. A. Schmuttenmaer, “Tutorial: An introduction to terahertz time domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS),”J. Appl. Phys., vol. 124, no. 23, 2018

    2018

  54. [54]

    Fundamental structure forming phenomena of polycrystalline films and the structure zone models,

    P. Barna and M. Adamik, “Fundamental structure forming phenomena of polycrystalline films and the structure zone models,”Thin Solid Films, vol. 317, no. 1-2, pp. 27–33, 1998

    1998

  55. [55]

    Influence of apparatus geometry and deposition con- ditions on the structure and topography of thick sputtered coatings,

    J. A. Thornton, “Influence of apparatus geometry and deposition con- ditions on the structure and topography of thick sputtered coatings,”J. Vac. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 666–670, 07 1974

    1974

  56. [56]

    Micro- structure, residual stress, and fracture of sputtered TiN films,

    L. Zhang, H. Yang, X. Pang, K. Gao, and A. A. V olinsky, “Micro- structure, residual stress, and fracture of sputtered TiN films,”Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 224, pp. 120–125, 2013

    2013

  57. [57]

    Superconducting properties and chemical composition of NbTiN thin films with different thickness,

    L. Zhang, W. Peng, L. You, and Z. Wang, “Superconducting properties and chemical composition of NbTiN thin films with different thickness,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 107, no. 12, 2015

    2015

  58. [58]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, 1996

    1996

  59. [59]

    Optical conductivity of BCS superconductors with arbitrary purity,

    W. Zimmermann, E. Brandt, M. Bauer, E. Seider, and L. Genzel, “Optical conductivity of BCS superconductors with arbitrary purity,” Phys. C: Supercond., vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 1991

    1991

  60. [60]

    Rules for the energy gap and critical field of supercon- ductors,

    T. P. Sheahen, “Rules for the energy gap and critical field of supercon- ductors,”Phys. Rev., vol. 149, no. 1, p. 368, 1966

    1966