Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

First-Principles Origins of Charge Transport in Molecular Semiconductors

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A parameter-free first-principles method predicts molecular-crystal charge transport and shows DNTT’s localization comes from correlated acoustic on-site disorder, not independent hopping fluctuations.

desk verdict Real end-to-end ab initio transport workflow with a credible DNTT reassignment; the static EPC story is solid, the dynamical half sits on a standard but under-benchmarked mixed QC partition. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25089 v1 pith:KBIBK7NP submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Tong Jiang , Joonho Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords chargetransportmolecularsemiconductorselectron-phononcouplingGreen-KubodynamicstransientlocalizationDNTTpicenephenacenes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Predicting how charge moves through organic molecular crystals has stayed hard because electrons couple to many phonons of different frequencies and ranges, putting carriers outside simple band or hopping pictures. This paper builds a fully first-principles route: it takes solid-state electron–phonon Hamiltonians, localizes them without gauge artifacts, and propagates carriers across hundreds of molecules with the full phonon spectrum using nonperturbative Green–Kubo dynamics. Across five crystals the calculations match measured mobilities, temperature trends, and optical-conductivity shapes. For the low-mobility workhorse DNTT they overturn the usual story, tracing transient localization to collective acoustic phonons that create correlated on-site energy disorder rather than independent intermolecular hopping noise. The same results organize the materials on a two-axis map of electronic connectivity versus low-frequency disorder and flag the phenacene family, with picene as the high-mobility example, as a promising underexplored class.

What carries the argument

Gauge-invariant real-space localization of the full ab initio electron–phonon Hamiltonian, followed by mixed quantum–classical Green–Kubo dynamics (classical sampling of slow phonons plus variational polaron dressing of fast modes, with memory-kernel reconstruction of the current correlation). This object lets mobility, optical conductivity, and real-space coherence emerge without a prescribed transport regime and supplies the two coordinates of the transport map: electronic connectivity and low-frequency electron–phonon disorder.

What would settle it

Recompute DNTT mobility, temperature exponent, and optical conductivity with a dynamics method that restores electronic back-action on the acoustic modes (or with a different fast/slow cutoff) on the same ab initio Hamiltonian; if the onsite-disorder bottleneck and displaced-Drude peak disappear or the mobility temperature power changes materially, the central mechanistic claim fails. Independently, single-crystal measurements that cleanly separate intrinsic mobility from contacts and grain boundaries should converge to the predicted intrinsic values and temperature exponents.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Transport regimes and bottlenecks in molecular semiconductors can be computed directly from ab initio electron–phonon Hamiltonians at domain scale, without assuming a mechanism or reducing the coupling to a few modes. The resulting dynamics reproduce experimental mobilities, temperature exponents, and optical fingerprints, and show that DNTT’s transient localization is driven by correlated on-site disorder from thermally populated acoustic phonons rather than independent hopping fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

Low-frequency phonons are treated as classical fields sampled without forces back from the electrons, with a fixed frequency cutoff separating them from high-frequency modes that are removed analytically by a polaron transform.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Design rules shift from maximizing transfer integrals alone toward simultaneously securing constructive connectivity and suppressing low-frequency acoustic electron–phonon disorder.
  • Phenacenes, sharing picene’s armchair frontier-orbital topology, are predicted as a coherent high-mobility class rather than isolated lucky compounds.
  • The same localized Hamiltonians become a common input for other nonperturbative solvers, turning mechanism diagnosis into a shared, material-specific starting point.
  • Machine-learning or semiempirical surrogates for the phonon and coupling step can turn the two-axis map into a high-throughput screen for new molecular semiconductors.
  • Channel-intervention diagnostics (onsite-only versus hopping-only) become a practical way to assign optical and mobility fingerprints to specific phonon channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If acoustic on-site disorder is the generic bottleneck in frustrated herringbone packings, pressure, side-chain, or dielectric engineering that hardens those acoustic branches should raise mobility more than further π-extension alone.
  • The framework’s domain-scale coherence maps suggest analogous two-axis organization may apply to soft hybrid semiconductors and 2D molecular frameworks where low-frequency lattice modes likewise dominate.
  • Alkali-intercalated picene superconductivity is consistent with the same weak-disorder, high-coherence corner of the map; charge-doped phenacenes may therefore be natural candidates for other collective electronic phases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an end-to-end first-principles framework for charge transport in molecular crystals. Starting from DFT/DFPT electron–phonon Hamiltonians, the authors develop a gauge-invariant maximal-localization scheme (Eq. 13) to obtain compact real-space electron–phonon couplings, then propagate carriers on domains of up to 648 molecules using a mixed quantum–classical Green–Kubo solver: high-frequency modes are traced out via a variational polaron transform, low-frequency modes are sampled classically, and a Mori memory kernel extends the current correlation to long times. The solver is benchmarked against TD-DMRG, HEOM, and HMC references on 1D/2D Peierls, Holstein, and multimode Holstein–Peierls models (Fig. 2a). Applied to DNTT, pentacene, picene, C8-BTBT, and C8-DNTT, the framework reproduces measured mobilities, temperature exponents, and optical-conductivity lineshapes, and is cross-checked against ARPES bandwidths and transfer integrals (Fig. S2). The headline mechanistic claim is that DNTT's transient localization is driven by correlated onsite disorder from finite-q acoustic phonons rather than independent hopping fluctuations, supported by mode-resolved fluctuation decomposition (Fig. 2d) and channel-removal interventions (Figs. 2f, 3d). A two-axis transport map (connectivity × low-frequency disorder) and a phenacene design suggestion follow.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial advance: quantitative, unfitted mobility and temperature-exponent predictions across five molecular crystals from ab initio Hamiltonians, at a domain scale (160,000+ phonon modes) not previously accessible to nonperturbative dynamics. Particular strengths worth naming: (i) the Hamiltonian is fixed by DFT/DFPT and dynamics parameters by internal criteria, so the agreement with FET/THz mobilities and exponents (Fig. 2b) is not a fit; (ii) independent ARPES validation of bandwidths and transfer integrals, including a nontrivial check that partial polaron dressing matches experiment (Fig. S2); (iii) direct head-to-head benchmarks of the solver against numerically exact MPS on a 9+1-mode Holstein–Peierls model; (iv) public data and the PyEPH code, supporting reproducibility. The DNTT bottleneck reassignment, if robust, corrects a widely cited mechanistic picture and the two-axis map offers genuinely falsifiable design guidance for the phenacene family.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2f, Fig. 3d; Methods Eqs. (22)–(27)] The paper's most novel claim — that DNTT's transient localization is driven by correlated onsite disorder rather than independent hopping fluctuations — rests dynamically on channel interventions (Fig. 2f: onsite removal restores Drude-like σ(ω); Fig. 3d: onsite removal suppresses the localized delocalization tail) performed inside the no-back-action solver of Eqs. 22–27. In that scheme slow phonons are sampled from the bare Boltzmann/Wigner distribution and evolve as classical fields without electronic back-action, so quasistatic-disorder-induced localization is partially built in, and the lattice relaxation/self-trapping response of the strongly coupled slow modes — the physics most likely to reshuffle the onsite-vs-hopping attribution — is absent by construction. The benchmark suite (Fig. 2a) does not cover this regime: 1D Peierls is hopping-only, 1D Holstein is single-mode onsite, th
  2. [Methods, after Eq. (22); Fig. 2b] The cutoff ω_c = max(2k_BT, |t|_max) is the single most consequential heuristic in the method: it decides which modes are dressed analytically and which are sampled classically, and it is temperature-dependent, so it directly shapes the predicted temperature exponents that serve as a key experimental validation (Fig. 2b). Yet no sensitivity analysis is shown. Please report how μ magnitudes, exponents a in μ ∝ T^(−a), and the DNTT σ(ω) lineshape change under a reasonable variation of ω_c (e.g., ±50% or 2k_BT vs |t|_max separately), and under Wigner vs Boltzmann sampling for the slow modes. If the exponents are robust, this substantially strengthens the paper; if not, the uncertainty should be stated.
  3. [Methods, memory-kernel reconstruction (Eq. 19); Fig. S9b] The Green–Kubo mobility integral relies on extending the explicitly propagated C(t) via the Mori memory kernel, valid only when M(t) decays within the explicit window. Fig. S9b shows DNTT has a notably long-lived memory kernel — the material for which the quantitative mobility agreement is most heavily advertised. Please quantify: the propagation window, the residual magnitude of M(t) at the window edge for DNTT, and the variation of the extracted μ as the reconstruction window is shortened/lengthened. Without this, the DNTT number in Fig. 2b–c carries an unquantified extrapolation error.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figs. 2 and 4; abstract] Fig. 2 caption/panel text contains typos: 'collevctive motions', and in Fig. 4 'photon absorbtion'; also 'fromab ini-tioelectron–phonon' in the abstract/introduction has a spacing error.
  2. [Fig. 3a] Fig. 3a: the axis positions are described as 'relative rankings inferred from' spectra and transfer-integral networks, and the mobility background is a visual interpolation. A quantitative definition of the two coordinates (even a heuristic one, e.g., integrated low-frequency fluctuation variance vs. signed plaquette product) would make the map more useful and let future materials be placed reproducibly.
  3. [Fig. 2a; SI benchmarking discussion] The 2D Peierls benchmark against HMC (Ref. 37) relies on analytic continuation of imaginary-time data, which is known to be ill-conditioned for real-time dynamics. This should be flagged explicitly in the text so readers can weigh that benchmark accordingly.
  4. [Fig. 2b discussion] C8-DNTT: the discrepancy with THz-probe mobility is handled reasonably, but the comparison would be cleaner if the text stated the probe dependence (THz vs FET vs cAFM) quantitatively rather than qualitatively 'narrowing this gap'.
  5. [Methods, Eq. (13)] Eq. (13): the localization functional and the role of the δ offsets should be given one more sentence of motivation; as written the weighting choice appears ad hoc, and the physical interpretation of the branch-resolved R_p index is only clarified in the Methods paragraph after Eq. (15).
  6. [Data and code availability] Data/code: the repository links are given, but versioned DOIs are promised only 'upon publication'. Depositing an archival release at revision would make the claims checkable now.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ab initio Hamiltonians and external benchmarks drive the claims; dynamics choices are scale/free-energy fixed, not fitted to μ(T).

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: experimental crystal structures → DFT/DFPT bands, phonons, and EPC → gauge-invariant real-space localization → mixed quantum–classical Green–Kubo dynamics with cutoff ω_c = max(2k_B T, |t|_max) and variational polaron parameters from free-energy minimization → μ(T), σ(ω), and channel interventions. None of these steps defines the target observables in terms of themselves or fits parameters to the mobility/optical data being predicted. The paper explicitly states calculations are not fitted to individual experiments and validates against external FET/THz mobilities, ARPES bandwidths/transfer integrals, and independent high-level solvers (TD-DMRG, HEOM, HMC) on model Hamiltonians. The DNTT onsite-vs-hopping reassignment rests on mode-resolved disorder in the ab initio Hamiltonian plus in-silico channel interventions; that is an approximate-dynamics correctness issue, not a by-construction reduction of output to fitted input. Overlap with prior transient-localization or Holstein–Peierls literature is citation of external frameworks, not a self-citation uniqueness chain. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or renaming-only unification is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard solid-state DFT/DFPT and Green–Kubo response theory, plus domain-specific modeling choices for mixed quantum–classical electron–phonon dynamics. No transport observables are fitted. Load-bearing modeling axioms are the fast/slow phonon partition, classical sampling of slow modes without back-action, variational polaron elimination of fast modes, and the adequacy of PBE+D3 Wannier EPC for the materials studied.

free parameters (4)
  • fast/slow phonon cutoff ω_c = max(2k_B T, |t|_max) = max(2k_B T, |t|_max)
    Methodological scale that partitions classical vs quantum phonon treatment; not fitted to mobility, but choice affects dressing and disorder sampling.
  • variational polaron coefficients {f_ν} = minimizers of A_β (material- and trajectory-dependent)
    Determined by minimizing polaronic free energy A_β for each configuration, not by fitting experiment; still an internal variational parameter set that shapes bandwidth narrowing.
  • DFT functional and dispersion (PBE + Grimme-D3) with norm-conserving pseudopotentials = PBE+D3 / PseudoDojo
    Standard first-principles choice controlling bands, phonons, and EPC; not tuned to transport data but not unique.
  • DFPT k/q grids and Wannier interpolation grids (up to 18×18×1) = e.g. 3×3×2 q coarse; up to 18×18×1 transport cells
    Numerical discretizations with reported convergence checks; not free in the fitting sense but control residual finite-size error.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Green–Kubo linear response: mobility is the time integral of the equilibrium current–current correlation (Eqs. 17–18).
    Standard nonequilibrium statistical mechanics; used as the definition of μ and σ(ω).
  • domain assumption Low-frequency phonons may be sampled as classical (Boltzmann/Wigner) fields without electronic back-action on the nuclei over the Green–Kubo window.
    Core of the mixed quantum–classical solver (Eq. 22); justified by benchmarks but known to break detailed balance at long times.
  • domain assumption High-frequency modes couple mainly onsite and can be traced out by a variational polaron (Lang–Firsov-like) transform that only renormalizes hoppings (Eqs. 24–26).
    Standard organic-crystal approximation; validated partly by ARPES bandwidth comparison (Fig. S2a).
  • domain assumption PBE+D3 DFPT Wannier EPC plus experimental crystal structures adequately represent the intrinsic single-crystal electron–phonon Hamiltonian.
    Underpins all material predictions; ARPES transfer-integral checks support electronics, full EPC accuracy is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper Gauge-invariant maximal localization of EPC (Eq. 13) preserves the physical content of the reciprocal-space Hamiltonian while yielding a compact real-space form.
    Authors’ localization functional with distance weighting; necessary for domain-scale dynamics; supported by localization plots (Fig. S8) but is a paper-specific construction.
  • domain assumption Memory-kernel reconstruction from short-time C(t) faithfully extends the Green–Kubo integral when M(t) decays inside the explicit window (Eq. 19).
    Used for largest cells to avoid long-time mixed QC artifacts; standard Mori formalism but accuracy depends on kernel decay.
invented entities (2)
  • Gauge-invariant maximally localized real-space electron–phonon coupling (phonon Wannier-like branch basis) independent evidence
    purpose: Convert gauge-dependent reciprocal-space EPC into compact real-space interactions usable for hundreds-of-molecule dynamics while retaining full phonon content.
    Defined by the localization functional Eq. 13 and the branch-resolved g^ν_ij(R_e, R_p); methodological entity, not a new physical particle.
  • Two-axis transport map (electronic connectivity × low-frequency EPC disorder)
    purpose: Organize materials from transient localization to Drude-like transport and generate design rules (e.g., phenacenes).
    Interpretive coordinate system built from signed transfer-integral products and mode-resolved low-frequency disorder; rankings are inferred from computed spectra, not an external observable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-Principles Origins of Charge Transport in Molecular Semiconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KBIBK7NP

@misc{pith2026260725089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-Principles Origins of Charge Transport in Molecular Semiconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KBIBK7NP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25089}
}
read the original abstract

Charge transport governs organic transistors and photovoltaics, yet predicting it from atomic structure remains challenging. Electron--phonon interactions span disparate frequencies, strengths and spatial ranges, and collectively generate nonperturbative carrier dynamics. Existing methods regain tractability only by assuming a mechanism or reducing electron--phonon coupling to a few modes. We introduce a parameter-free framework that instead computes transport from ab initio electron--phonon Hamiltonians, propagating carriers across hundreds-of-molecule domains with the full phonon spectrum and letting transport regimes and bottlenecks emerge from nonperturbative Green--Kubo dynamics. Across five representative crystals, it captures measured mobilities, temperature exponents, and optical-conductivity fingerprints. Our results overturn the prevailing microscopic mechanism for DNTT, tracing its transient localization to correlated on-site disorder from acoustic phonons rather than independent hopping fluctuations. The resulting two-axis transport map provides design principles and highlights the underexplored phenacene family, exemplified by the high-mobility picene, as a promising direction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25089 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Delocalized Coupled-Cluster Theory for Polaron Structure and Dynamics

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Delocalized coupled-cluster theory gives a scalable, systematically improvable variational description of polaron ground states, spectral functions, and optical conductivities from model Hamiltonians to ab initio materials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Zhang, S

    T. Zhang, S. Chen, P. S. Petkov, P. Zhang, H. Qi, N. N. Nguyen, W. Zhang, J. Yoon, P. Li, T. Brumme, A. Alfonsov, Z. Liao, M. Hambsch, S. Xu, L. Mester, V. Kataev, B. B¨ uchner, S. C. B. Mannsfeld, E. Zschech, S. S. P. Parkin, U. Kaiser, T. Heine, R. Dong, R. Hillen- brand, and X. Feng, Two-dimensional polyaniline crystal with metallic out-of-plane conduc...

    2025

  2. [2]

    Claes, S

    R. Claes, S. Ponc´ e, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hautier, Phonon-limited electronic transport through first princi- ples, Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 73 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Z. Xie, D. Liu, C. Gao, H. Dong, and W. Hu, High- mobility emissive organic semiconductors: an emerging class of multifunctional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.9, 837 (2024). 10

    2024

  4. [4]

    P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, and P. Abbamonte, Stranger than metals, Science377, eabh4273 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    K. Lu, Y. Li, Q. Wang, L. Wu, X. Ren, X. Chen, L. Liu, Y. Li, X. Xu, Q. Zhang, D. Wang, L. Zhou, M. Xiao, S. Jiang, M. Pei, H. Gong, W. Wood, I. E. Jacobs, J. Wang, G. Chen, P. Wang, Z. Li, C. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Ji, S. Li, J. Qiao, Y. Shi, and H. Sirringhaus, Metallic charge transport in conjugated molecular bilayers, Nat. Electron.9, 246 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    Franchini, M

    C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Polarons in materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 560 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Fratini, S

    S. Fratini, S. Ciuchi, D. Mayou, G. T. De Laissardi` ere, and A. Troisi, A map of high-mobility molecular semi- conductors, Nat. Mater.16, 998 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Oberhofer, K

    H. Oberhofer, K. Reuter, and J. Blumberger, Charge transport in molecular materials: An assessment of com- putational methods, Chem. Rev.117, 10319 (2017)

    2017

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    W. Li, J. Ren, and Z. Shuai, A general charge trans- port picture for organic semiconductors with nonlo- cal electron-phonon couplings, Nat. Commun.12, 4260 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    W. Ma, L. Liu, J. A. R¨ ohr, W. Li, J. Zhu, Z. Shuai, and J. Yan, Physical insights into single-component organic photovoltaics, Joule , 102397 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    Biswas, R

    S. Biswas, R. Zhao, F. Alowa, M. Zacharias, S. Shar- ifzadeh, D. F. Coker, D. S. Seferos, and G. D. Scholes, Exciton polaron formation and hot-carrier relaxation in rigid Dion–Jacobson-type two-dimensional perovskites, Nat. Mater.23, 937 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Bronstein, C

    H. Bronstein, C. B. Nielsen, B. C. Schroeder, and I. Mc- Culloch, The role of chemical design in the performance of organic semiconductors, Nat. Rev. Chem.4, 66 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Fratini, M

    S. Fratini, M. Nikolka, A. Salleo, G. Schweicher, and H. Sirringhaus, Charge transport in high-mobility con- jugated polymers and molecular semiconductors, Nat. Mater.19, 491 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Giannini and J

    S. Giannini and J. Blumberger, Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors: The Perspective from Nona- diabatic Molecular Dynamics, Acc. Chem. Res.55, 819 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Schweicher, G

    G. Schweicher, G. D’Avino, M. T. Ruggiero, D. J. Harkin, K. Broch, D. Venkateshvaran, G. Liu, A. Richard, C. Ruzi´ e, J. Armstrong, A. R. Kennedy, K. Shankland, K. Takimiya, Y. H. Geerts, J. A. Zeitler, S. Fratini, and H. Sirringhaus, Chasing the “Killer” Phonon Mode for the R...

    2019

  8. [16]

    Nelson, J

    J. Nelson, J. J. Kwiatkowski, J. Kirkpatrick, and J. M. Frost, Modeling Charge Transport in Organic Photo- voltaic Materials, Acc. Chem. Res.42, 1768 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Shuai, H

    Z. Shuai, H. Geng, W. Xu, Y. Liao, and J.-M. Andr´ e, From charge transport parameters to charge mobility in organic semiconductors through multiscale simulation, Chem. Soc. Rev.43, 2662 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Shuai, W

    Z. Shuai, W. Li, J. Ren, Y. Jiang, and H. Geng, Ap- plying marcus theory to describe the carrier transports in organic semiconductors: Limitations and beyond, J. Chem. Phys.153, 10.1063/5.0018312 (2020)

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Giannini, A

    S. Giannini, A. Carof, M. Ellis, H. Yang, O. G. Ziogos, S. Ghosh, and J. Blumberger, Quantum localization and delocalization of charge carriers in organic semiconduct- ing crystals, Nat. Commun.10, 3843 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    J. Xi, M. Long, L. Tang, D. Wang, and Z. Shuai, First- principles prediction of charge mobility in carbon and organic nanomaterials, Nanoscale4, 4348 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    B. K. Chang, J.-J. Zhou, N.-E. Lee, and M. Bernardi, In- termediate polaronic charge transport in organic crystals from a many-body first-principles approach, npj Comput. Mater.8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Zheng, Y

    Z. Zheng, Y. Shi, J.-J. Zhou, O. V. Prezhdo, Q. Zheng, and J. Zhao, Ab initio real-time quantum dynamics of charge carriers in momentum space, Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 532 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Fratini, D

    S. Fratini, D. Mayou, and S. Ciuchi, The Transient Lo- calization Scenario for Charge Transport in Crystalline Organic Materials, Adv. Funct. Mater.26, 2292 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    B. K. Chang and M. Bernardi, Bandlike charge trans- port and electron–phonon coupling in organic molecular crystals, J. Phys. Condens. Matter37, 095704 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    J.-J. Zhou, J. Park, I.-T. Lu, I. Maliyov, X. Tong, and M. Bernardi, Perturbo: A software package for ab initio electron–phonon interactions, charge transport and ul- trafast dynamics, Comput. Phys. Commun.264, 107970 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume,Statistical physics II: nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, Vol. 31 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    J. H. Fetherolf, D. Goleˇ z, and T. C. Berkelbach, A unifi- cation of the holstein polaron and dynamic disorder pic- tures of charge transport in organic crystals, Phys. Rev. X10, 021062 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    J. E. Runeson, T. J. G. Drayton, and D. E. Manolopou- los, Charge transport in organic semiconductors from the mapping approach to surface hopping, arXiv:2406.19851 10.48550/arXiv.2406.19851 (2024); J. E. Runeson and D. E. Manolopoulos, Nuclear quantum effects slow down the en...

    2024 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Mori, Transport, collective motion, and brownian mo- tion, Prog

    H. Mori, Transport, collective motion, and brownian mo- tion, Prog. Theor. Phys.33, 423 (1965)

    1965

  23. [31]

    De Filippis, V

    G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, A. S. Mishchenko, N. Na- gaosa, A. Fierro, and A. de Candia, Crossover from super- to subdiffusive motion and memory effects in crys- talline organic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 086601 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    J.-m. Cho, T. Higashino, and T. Mori, Band-like trans- port down to 20 k in organic single-crystal transistors based on dioctylbenzothienobenzothiophene, Appl. Phys. Lett.106, 193303 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Y. Yuan, G. Giri, A. L. Ayzner, A. P. Zoombelt, S. C. B. Mannsfeld, J. Chen, D. Nordlund, M. F. Toney, J. Huang, and Z. Bao, Ultra-high mobility transparent organic thin film transistors grown by an off-centre spin-coating method, Nat. Commun.5, 3005 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Giannini, L

    S. Giannini, L. Di Virgilio, M. Bardini, J. Hausch, J. J. Geuchies, W. Zheng, M. Volpi, J. Elsner, K. Broch, Y. H. Geerts, F. Schreiber, G. Schweicher, H. I. Wang, J. Blum- berger, M. Bonn, and D. Beljonne, Transiently delocal- ized states enhance hole mobility in organic mole...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Giceviˇ cius, H

    M. Giceviˇ cius, H. Gong, N. Turetta, W. Wood, M. Volpi, Y. Geerts, P. Samor ` ı, and H. Sirringhaus, Probing Out- Of-Plane Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors Using Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy, Adv. Mater. 11 37, 2418694 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Jankovi´ c, Charge transport limited by nonlocal electron-phonon interaction

    V. Jankovi´ c, Charge transport limited by nonlocal electron-phonon interaction. i. hierarchical equations of motion approach, Phys. Rev. B112, 035111 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Ostmeyer, T

    J. Ostmeyer, T. Nematiaram, A. Troisi, and P. Buiv- idovich, First-principles quantum monte carlo study of charge-carrier mobility in organic molecular semiconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, L031004 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    E. G. Bittle, J. I. Basham, T. N. Jackson, O. D. Jurch- escu, and D. J. Gundlach, Mobility overestimation due to gated contacts in organic field-effect transistors, Nat. Commun.7, 10908 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Hwang, D

    K.-H. Hwang, D. Brandt, S. Cristofaro, C. J. Nickerson, F. Modesti, M. Giceviˇ cius, M. T. Cervantes, M. Volpi, L. J. Spalek, L. Muccioli,et al., Measuring the molec- ular origins of stiffness in organic semiconductors, Nat. Commun.17, 1621 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    Takeyama, S

    Y. Takeyama, S. Ono, and Y. Matsumoto, Organic single crystal transistor characteristics of single-crystal phase pentacene grown by ionic liquid-assisted vacuum depo- sition, Appl. Phys. Lett.101(2012); O. D. Jurchescu, J. Baas, and T. T. M. Palstra, The effect of impurities o...

    2012

  33. [41]

    Troisi and G

    A. Troisi and G. Orlandi, Charge-transport regime of crystalline organic semiconductors: Diffusion limited by thermal off-diagonal electronic disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086601 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    R. S. S´ anchez-Carrera, S. Atahan, J. Schrier, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Theoretical characterization of the air- stable, high-mobility dinaphtho[2,3-b:2’,3’-f]thieno[3,2- b]thiophene organic semiconductor, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 2334 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Troisi, Charge transport in high mobility molecu- lar semiconductors: Classical models and new theories, Chem

    A. Troisi, Charge transport in high mobility molecu- lar semiconductors: Classical models and new theories, Chem. Soc. Rev.40, 2347 (2011)

    2011

  36. [45]

    Mitsuhashi, Y

    R. Mitsuhashi, Y. Suzuki, Y. Yamanari, H. Mitamura, T. Kambe, N. Ikeda, H. Okamoto, A. Fujiwara, M. Ya- maji, N. Kawasaki,et al., Superconductivity in alkali- metal-doped picene, Nature464, 76 (2010)

    2010

  37. [46]

    Jiang, S

    H. Jiang, S. Zhu, Z. Cui, Z. Li, Y. Liang, J. Zhu, P. Hu, H.-L. Zhang, and W. Hu, High-performance five-ring- fused organic semiconductors for field-effect transistors, Chem. Soc. Rev.51, 3071 (2022)

    2022

  38. [47]

    C. K. Lee, J. Moix, and J. Cao, Coherent quantum trans- port in disordered systems: A unified polaron treatment of hopping and band-like transport, J. Chem. Phys.142, 164103 (2015)

    2015

  39. [48]

    Song and Q

    L. Song and Q. Shi, A new approach to calculate charge carrier transport mobility in organic molecular crystals from imaginary time path integral simulations, J. Chem. Phys.142, 174103 (2015)

    2015

  40. [49]

    Lian, Y.-C

    M. Lian, Y.-C. Wang, Y. Ke, and Y. Zhao, Non- markovian stochastic schr¨ odinger equation in k-space to- ward the calculation of carrier dynamics in organic semi- conductors, J. Chem. Phys.151(2019)

    2019

  41. [50]

    L. Wang, J. Qiu, X. Bai, and J. Xu, Surface hopping methods for nonadiabatic dynamics in extended systems, WIREs Comput Mol Sci.10, e1435 (2020)

    2020

  42. [51]

    J. Ren, W. Li, T. Jiang, Y. Wang, and Z. Shuai, Time- dependent density matrix renormalization group method for quantum dynamics in complex systems, WIREs Com- put. Mol. Sci.12, e1614 (2022)

    2022

  43. [52]

    B. Wu, B. Li, X. He, X. Cheng, J. Ren, and J. Liu, Nona- diabatic field: A conceptually novel approach for nona- diabatic quantum molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Theory Comput.21, 3775 (2025)

    2025

  44. [53]

    M. K. Baumgarten, H. Wu, T. Jiang, and J. Lee, A scal- able translationally invariant variational theory of ab ini- tio polarons, arXiv:2605.05675 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  45. [54]

    G. D. Scholes, G. R. Fleming, L. X. Chen, A. Aspuru- Guzik, A. Buchleitner, D. F. Coker, G. S. Engel, R. Van Grondelle, A. Ishizaki, D. M. Jonas,et al., Using coherence to enhance function in chemical and biophysi- cal systems, Nature543, 647 (2017)

    2017

  46. [55]

    Br´ edas, E

    J.-L. Br´ edas, E. H. Sargent, and G. D. Scholes, Photo- voltaic concepts inspired by coherence effects in photo- synthetic systems, Nat. Mater.16, 35 (2017)

    2017

  47. [56]

    Zhong, S

    Y. Zhong, S. Liu, B. Zhang, Z. Tao, Y. Sun, W. Chu, X.- G. Gong, J.-H. Yang, and H. Xiang, Accelerating the cal- culation of electron–phonon coupling strength with ma- chine learning, Nat. Comput. Sci.4, 615 (2024)

    2024

  48. [57]

    Q. Gu, Z. Zhouyin, S. K. Pandey, P. Zhang, L. Zhang, and W. E, Deep learning tight-binding approach for large-scale electronic simulations at finite temperatures with ab initio accuracy, Nat. Commun.15, 6772 (2024)

    2024

  49. [58]

    Baˇ ci´ c, T

    V. Baˇ ci´ c, T. Heine, and A. Kuc, Analytical approach to phonon calculations in the scc-dftb framework, J. Chem. Phys.153(2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    S. Fu, J. Zhang, X. Li, E. Jin, L. Gao, R. Dong, Z. Wang, X. Feng, H. I. Wang, and M. Bonn, Fundamentals of charge transport in two-dimensional framework materi- als, Nat. Rev. Mater. , 1 (2025)

    2025

  51. [60]

    D. H. L. Tjhe, X. Ren, I. E. Jacobs, G. D’Avino, T. B. E. Mustafa, T. G. Marsh, L. Zhang, Y. Fu, A. E. Man- sour, A. Opitz, Y. Huang, W. Zhu, A. H. Unal, S. Hoek, V. Lemaur, C. Quarti, Q. He, J.-K. Lee, I. McCul- loch, M. Heeney, N. Koch, C. P. Grey, D. Beljonne, S. Fratini, a...

    2024

  52. [61]

    Aydin, J

    A. Aydin, J. Keski-Rahkonen, and E. J. Heller, Quantum acoustics unravels planckian resistivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.121, e2404853121 (2024)

    2024

  53. [62]

    Bennecke, I

    W. Bennecke, I. Gonzalez Oliva, J. P. Bange, P. Werner, D. Schmitt, M. Merboldt, A. M. Seiler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Steil,et al., Hybrid frenkel–wannier ex- citons facilitate ultrafast energy transfer at a 2d–organic interface, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2025)

    2025

  54. [63]

    Liang, H

    Z. Liang, H. H. Choi, X. Luo, T. Liu, A. Abtahi, U. S. Ramasamy, J. A. Hitron, K. N. Baustert, J. L. Hempel, A. M. Boehm, A. Ansary, D. R. Strachan, J. Mei, C. Risko, V. Podzorov, and K. R. Graham, N-type charge transport in heavily p-doped polymers, Nat. Mater.20, 518 (2021). 12

    2021

  55. [64]

    Asher, D

    M. Asher, D. Angerer, R. Korobko, Y. Diskin-Posner, D. A. Egger, and O. Yaffe, Anharmonic lattice vibrations in small-molecule organic semiconductors, Adv. Mater. 32, 1908028 (2020)

    2020

  56. [65]

    P. A. Banks, G. D’Avino, G. Schweicher, J. Arm- strong, C. Ruzi´ e, J. W. Chung, J.-I. Park, C. Sawabe, T. Okamoto, J. Takeya, H. Sirringhaus, and M. T. Rug- giero, Untangling the Fundamental Electronic Origins of Non-Local Electron–Phonon Coupling in Organic Semi- conductors,...

    2023

  57. [66]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  58. [67]

    Ponc´ e, E

    S. Ponc´ e, E. R. Margine, C. Verdi, and F. Giustino, Epw: Electron–phonon coupling, transport and superconduct- ing properties using maximally localized wannier func- tions, Comput. Phys. Commun.209, 116 (2016)

    2016

  59. [68]

    Giannozziet al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J

    P. Giannozziet al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  60. [69]

    Pizziet al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J

    G. Pizziet al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  61. [70]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  62. [71]

    Grimme, Semiempirical gga-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction, J

    S. Grimme, Semiempirical gga-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction, J. Comput. Chem.27, 1787 (2006)

    2006

  63. [72]

    M. J. van Settenet al., The pseudodojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseu- dopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun.226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  64. [73]

    Yamamoto and K

    T. Yamamoto and K. Takimiya, Facile synthesis of highly π-extended heteroarenes, dinaphtho [2, 3-b: 2 ‘, 3 ‘-f] chalcogenopheno [3, 2-b] chalcogenophenes, and their ap- plication to field-effect transistors, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2224 (2007)

    2007

  65. [74]

    Cheng and R

    Y.-C. Cheng and R. J. Silbey, A unified theory for charge- carrier transport in organic crystals, J. Chem. Phys.128, 114713 (2008)

    2008

  66. [75]

    Wang and Y

    Y.-C. Wang and Y. Zhao, Variational polaron transfor- mation approach toward the calculation of thermopower in organic crystals, Phys. Rev. B101, 075205 (2020)

    2020

  67. [76]

    D. J. Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization, Phys. Rep.13, 93 (1974)

    1974

  68. [77]

    Y. Li, Y. Yi, V. Coropceanu, and J.-L. Br´ edas, Optical conductivity and optical effective mass in a high-mobility organic semiconductor: Implications for the nature of charge transport, Phys. Rev. B90, 245112 (2014). S1 Supplementary Materials for First-Principles Origins of...

    2014

  69. [78]

    Evolve classical field

  70. [79]

    Evolve density matrices

  71. [80]

    Polaron transform Current correlation

  72. [81]

    MPI I/O ⟳ ensemble average Mobility Optical Cond. Fourier transform of Carrier structure localization, IPR DOS, polaron size Setup Electronic diagnostics DOS, band structure effective masses Mode-resolved analysis EPC strength spatial decomposition Transport map connectivity E...

  73. [82]

    Here, we briefly situate our solver choice within the broader landscape of available approaches

    Connections to alternative dynamics methodsA key design principle of this work is that the first-principles Hamiltonian is constructed independently of the quantum dynamics solver, and can serve as input to other advanced methods for electron–phonon coupled systems. Here, we b...

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.