Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Vorticity and magnetic fields leave opposite fingerprints on the mass spectrum of dilepton polarization, turning virtual photons into a dual probe of the extreme QGP.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 04:13 UTC pith:KC4366MA

load-bearing objection Clean first QFT spectral-function calculation of dilepton λ_θ under finite vorticity, with a useful side-by-side contrast to strong-B Landau-level spectra; the probe claim is real but rests on idealized static uniform fields. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.11634 v1 pith:KC4366MA submitted 2026-07-13 hep-ph

Thermal Dilepton Polarization under Rotation or Magnetic Field in Heavy-ion Collisions

Haowen He , Bowen Hou , Xingyang Wang , Minghua Wei This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords dilepton polarizationquark-gluon plasmavorticitymagnetic fieldspectral functionanisotropy coefficientsheavy-ion collisionsLandau levels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In the hot quark-gluon plasma created by heavy-ion collisions, quark-antiquark pairs annihilate into virtual photons that later decay into lepton pairs. Both the fluid's vorticity and the strong magnetic field can polarize those virtual photons, imprinting measurable anisotropy coefficients on the angular distribution of the dileptons. This paper calculates that imprint from first principles by modifying the quark propagator for rigid rotation or for Landau levels and extracting the electromagnetic spectral function. Under rotation the leading anisotropy coefficient falls smoothly with dilepton mass; under a magnetic field it oscillates as successive Landau levels open. Because the two patterns are qualitatively distinct, a single set of polarization measurements can in principle disentangle the two external fields that coexist in the early plasma.

Core claim

The modified quark propagator under rotation versus under a magnetic field produces qualitatively different invariant-mass spectra for the dilepton anisotropy coefficient λ_θ: monotonic decline for vorticity, Landau-level-driven oscillations for magnetic fields. These spectral shapes therefore serve as complementary, field-sensitive probes of the extreme conditions inside the quark-gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

The electromagnetic spectral function obtained from the imaginary part of the one-loop photon polarization tensor built with the field-modified quark propagator; its spin-projection decomposition directly yields the virtual-photon spin-density matrix and the anisotropy coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes a rigidly rotating medium with constant angular velocity and a perfectly uniform, static magnetic field—idealizations that ignore the rapid expansion and spatial inhomogeneity of a real collision.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of λ_θ(M) in the 0.6–3 GeV window that fails to show either the smooth decline predicted for realistic vorticity or the oscillatory jumps predicted for magnetic fields of a few m_π^{2} would falsify the claimed diagnostic power of the spectral shapes.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Simultaneous extraction of λ_θ(M) can separate the average strength of vorticity from that of the magnetic field without relying solely on elliptic flow.
  • The oscillatory thresholds themselves encode the Landau-level spacing and therefore the local magnetic-field magnitude during the QGP stage.
  • Weighted averages of λ_θ over the experimentally accessible mass window remain large enough to be measurable even after thermal smearing.
  • The same framework immediately supplies the remaining anisotropy coefficients λ_φ and λ_θφ once the full angular distribution is recorded.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because real collisions contain both fields at once, the next calculational step—superposing rotation and magnetic field in the same propagator—will reveal whether the two signals interfere constructively or cancel.
  • Event-by-event fluctuations of local vorticity (already known to reach 100–200 MeV) should produce a measurable high-mass tail in λ_θ that is absent from global-average estimates.
  • If the predicted Landau oscillations survive hadronic background subtraction, dilepton polarization becomes a direct chronometer of magnetic-field lifetime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes thermal dilepton polarization (primarily the anisotropy coefficient λ_θ) from the electromagnetic spectral function of a hot QGP, obtained via one-loop Matsubara sums with the known rigid-rotation quark propagator (Eq. 3.4) and the full Landau-level magnetized propagator (Eq. 4.4). Spin-density-matrix elements are extracted in the helicity frame (Eqs. 2.4–2.7) and converted to angular coefficients. Under rotation, λ_θ falls monotonically with invariant mass M and grows with Ω (Figs. 2–3); under a magnetic field it exhibits Landau-threshold oscillations between longitudinal and transverse polarization (Figs. 6–7), which largely survive a production-rate-weighted average (Fig. 8). The authors conclude that the qualitatively distinct M-spectra make dilepton polarization a complementary probe of both vorticity and magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions.

Significance. If the idealized static-uniform results survive realistic space-time averaging, the work supplies a clean, parameter-free diagnostic that distinguishes vorticity (monotonic, charge-blind) from magnetic fields (oscillatory, charge-dependent) using an electromagnetic observable already measured by NA60 and HADES. The calculation is first-principles within finite-T QFT, re-uses established propagators and helicity-frame formulas, and produces falsifiable spectral shapes without fitted parameters in the definition of λ_θ itself. Even if dynamical dilution reduces the absolute size of the signals, the qualitative contrast remains a useful theoretical benchmark for future hydrodynamic or transport implementations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Sec. 5] Abstract, Sec. 5 and the probe claim: the asserted “characteristic differences” and the conclusion that dilepton polarization is a “complementary and sensitive probe” rest exclusively on static, spatially uniform media at q = 0 (Secs. 3.1–3.2, Eqs. 3.7–3.12; Secs. 4.1–4.2, Eqs. 4.7–4.11). In real collisions both Ω(x,t) and eB(x,t) are rapidly evolving and inhomogeneous; Landau thresholds will be averaged over a continuum of local field strengths, while the already tiny rotation-induced λ_θ (∼10^{-4}–10^{-3} for global Ω ∼ 8–30 MeV) is further diluted. A quantitative estimate or at least a clear discussion of the robustness of the contrast under space-time integration is required before the probe claim can be regarded as established.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] Sec. 3.2 and Figs. 2–3: only the diagonal coefficient λ_θ is shown for the rotating medium, and exclusively at vanishing three-momentum. The spectral-function components derived in Eqs. 3.7–3.8 contain the information needed for λ_ϕ and λ_θϕ; their omission leaves the multi-dimensional probe advertised in the introduction and outlook incomplete. At least a brief evaluation of the remaining coefficients (or an explicit statement why they vanish) is needed.
  3. [Sec. 4.2 / Fig. 8] Sec. 4.2, Fig. 8: the production-rate-weighted average already softens the Landau oscillations into mild inflection points. This indicates that even modest experimental mass binning or residual field inhomogeneity will further suppress the distinctive oscillatory signature that underpins the claimed contrast with rotation. The manuscript should quantify how much of the oscillation amplitude survives realistic experimental resolution.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Eq. 2.3] Notation for the azimuthal coefficient is inconsistent (λ_ϕ in the abstract and Eq. 2.3 versus λ_φ elsewhere). Standardize throughout.
  2. [Fig. 5] Fig. 5 caption and text refer to “Born rate” without defining the precise kinematic cuts or lepton-mass treatment used for the zero-field baseline; a one-sentence clarification would help reproducibility.
  3. [Secs. 3.1, 4.1] The rigid-rotation metric (Eq. 3.2) and the symmetric-gauge Landau-level wave functions are standard, yet a short remark on the domain of validity (e.g., ΩR ≪ 1, |eB| ≪ T^{2} for the LLL-dominated regime) would orient non-specialist readers.
  4. [Introduction] References [36] and [27] (earlier works by overlapping authors on rates and weak-field polarization) are cited, but a more explicit statement of what is new relative to those papers would improve novelty disclosure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: anisotropy coefficients follow from spectral functions of modified propagators; parameters are external inputs, not fitted to the target observables.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Modified quark propagators under rigid rotation (Eq. 3.4) or magnetic field (Eq. 4.4) are inserted into the one-loop polarization tensor; the electromagnetic spectral function is obtained from its imaginary part (Eq. 3.6 and the conductivities of Eqs. 4.7–4.8); the virtual-photon spin-density matrix and the anisotropy coefficients (Eqs. 2.4–2.5, 4.11) are then extracted by standard tensor decomposition. Temperature, quark masses and field strengths are taken as external literature values or varied parametrically; no parameter is fitted to any subset of the λ_θ(M) spectra that are later presented as results. Self-citations appear (e.g., [24,27,36,51] for prior rate/ellipticity calculations by overlapping authors), but they supply intermediate spectral-function expressions that are independently derived and externally falsifiable; they do not define or force the polarization coefficients themselves. The claimed qualitative contrast (monotonic fall under rotation versus Landau-threshold oscillations under B) is therefore a genuine output of the calculation, not an input renamed or fitted by construction. Idealizations such as rigid rotation and uniform static fields affect realism but do not create circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard finite-temperature QFT plus two domain idealizations (rigid rotation, constant uniform B) and a handful of numerical inputs fixed by phenomenology or varied parametrically. No new dynamical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • T = 160 MeV
    Temperature fixed at 160 MeV for all numerical plots; controls the Fermi–Dirac distributions and overall rate.
  • M_u = M_d = 5 MeV
    Light-quark masses set to 5 MeV; enter the dispersion relations and thresholds.
  • Ω values = 8–200 MeV
    Angular velocities 8, 30, 100, 200 MeV chosen to span global-to-local vorticity estimates; free scan parameters.
  • eB values = 1–10 m_π²
    Magnetic-field strengths m_π² to 10 m_π² scanned; free parameters representing early-time estimates.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Rigid-rotation metric and the associated spin-connection modification of the Dirac operator (Eqs. 3.2–3.3)
    Standard literature approximation for global vorticity; neglects differential rotation and boundaries.
  • domain assumption Constant, homogeneous magnetic field in the symmetric gauge with full Landau-level sum
    Idealization of the early-time field; real fields decay and are inhomogeneous.
  • domain assumption One-loop photon polarization tensor with free (modified) quark propagators
    Leading-order spectral function; higher-order medium corrections omitted.
  • standard math Helicity-frame spin-density-matrix extraction from the spectral function via Maxwell projection (Eqs. 2.5–2.6)
    Standard relation used throughout the dilepton-polarization literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20129 in / 2656 out tokens · 23542 ms · 2026-07-14T04:13:38.589954+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dilepton (Virtual photon) polarization is characterized by anisotropic coefficients $\lambda_{\theta}$, $\lambda_{\phi}$, and $\lambda_{\theta\phi}$, which are expected to be influenced by vorticity and magnetic fields. This work investigates thermal dilepton production in a quark-gluon plasma via the quark-antiquark annihilation process $q\bar{q} \to \gamma^* \to l^+l^-$. Virtual photon polarization can be induced by both the spin polarization of quarks and the anisotropy of their momentum distribution in the medium. By employing the modified quark propagator under an external field, we derive the electromagnetic spectral function in a hot medium. Based on the spin-projection decomposition of the spectral function, the spin density matrix elements of the virtual photon and the anisotropy coefficients for the emitted dileptons are determined. Due to the distinct effects of vorticity and magnetic fields on the quark propagator, the resulting invariant mass spectra of dilepton polarization exhibit characteristic differences. Furthermore, our study reveals the response of dilepton polarization signals to external fields of varying strengths, suggesting dilepton polarization as a complementary and sensitive probe for both vorticity and magnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jiang, Z.-W

    Y. Jiang, Z.-W. Lin and J. Liao,Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C94(2016) 044910 [1602.06580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Skokov, A.Y

    V. Skokov, A.Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev,Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 5925 [0907.1396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Voronyuk, V.D

    V. Voronyuk, V.D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E.L. Bratkovskaya, V.P. Konchakovski and S.A. Voloshin,(Electro-)Magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C83(2011) 054911 [1103.4239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang,Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 044907 [1201.5108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Becattini, J

    F. Becattini, J. Liao and M.A. Lisa, eds.,Strongly Interacting Matter under Rotation, vol. 987 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer (2021), 10.1007/978-3-030-71427-7

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71427-7 2021

  6. [6]

    Kharzeev, L.D

    D.E. Kharzeev, L.D. McLerran and H.J. Warringa,The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’,Nucl. Phys. A803(2008) 227 [0711.0950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    H.-L. Chen, K. Fukushima, X.-G. Huang and K. Mameda,Analogy between rotation and density for Dirac fermions in a magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 104052 [1512.08974]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima and K. Mameda,Boundary effects and gapped dispersion in rotating fermionic matter,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 94 [1608.00336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Liu and I

    Y. Liu and I. Zahed,Pion Condensation by Rotation in a Magnetic field,Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(2018) 032001 [1711.08354]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Hou and J. Liao,Mesonic Condensation in Isospin Matter under Rotation, Chin. Phys. C44(2020) 111001 [1812.11787]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Ambrus,Helical massive fermions under rotation,JHEP08(2020) 016 [1912.09977]

    V.E. Ambrus,Helical massive fermions under rotation,JHEP08(2020) 016 [1912.09977]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Bai and L

    P. Bai and L. He,Absence of charged pion condensation in a magnetic field with parallel rotation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 074016 [2512.07473]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Rapp,Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies,Adv

    R. Rapp,Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies,Adv. High Energy Phys.2013(2013) 148253 [1304.2309]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Bailhache and H

    R. Bailhache and H. Appelsh¨ auser,Dileptons at Colliders as Probes of the Quark–Gluon Plasma,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75(2025) 463 [2512.10597]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Rapp and H

    R. Rapp and H. van Hees,Thermal Dileptons as Fireball Thermometer and Chronometer, Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 586 [1411.4612]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Churchill, L

    J. Churchill, L. Du, C. Gale, G. Jackson and S. Jeon,Dilepton production at next-to-leading order and intermediate invariant-mass observables,Phys. Rev. C109(2024) 044915 [2311.06675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Churchill, L

    J. Churchill, L. Du, C. Gale, G. Jackson and S. Jeon,Virtual Photons Shed Light on the Early Temperature of Dense QCD Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 172301 [2311.06951]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Massen, G

    O. Massen, G. Nijs, M. Sas, W. van der Schee and R. Snellings,Effective temperatures of the QGP from thermal photon and dilepton production,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 388 [2412.09671]. [20]STARcollaboration,Temperature measurement of Quark-Gluon plasma at different stages, Nature Commun.16(2025) 9098 [2402.01998]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Bandyopadhyay, C.A

    A. Bandyopadhyay, C.A. Islam and M.G. Mustafa,Electromagnetic spectral properties and Debye screening of a strongly magnetized hot medium,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 114034 [1602.06769]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Bandyopadhyay, M

    A. Bandyopadhyay, M. Kundu, V.E. Ambrus and M.N. Chernodub,Signatures of local acceleration of quark-gluon plasma in the dilepton production,J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.5 (2026) 100270 [2512.14375]

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Castorina, D

    P. Castorina, D. Kharzeev and H. Satz,Thermal Hadronization and Hawking-Unruh Radiation in QCD,Eur. Phys. J. C52(2007) 187 [0704.1426]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Wei, C.A

    M. Wei, C.A. Islam and M. Huang,Production rate and ellipticity of lepton pairs from a rotating hot and dense QCD medium,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 054014 [2111.05192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Heinz and M

    U.W. Heinz and M. Jacob,Evidence for a new state of matter: An Assessment of the results from the CERN lead beam program,nucl-th/0002042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Casta˜ no-Yepes and E

    J.D. Casta˜ no-Yepes and E. Mu˜ noz,Dilepton production in a rotating thermal medium: The rigid rotation approximation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 116001 [2509.18219]

    arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Wang and I.A

    X. Wang and I.A. Shovkovy,Rate and ellipticity of dilepton production in a magnetized quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 036014 [2205.00276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    A. Das, A. Bandyopadhyay and C.A. Islam,Lepton pair production from a hot and dense QCD medium in the presence of an arbitrary magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 056021 [2109.00019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Salabura and J

    P. Salabura and J. Stroth,Dilepton radiation from strongly interacting systems,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.120(2021) 103869 [2005.14589]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Laine,NLO thermal dilepton rate at non-zero momentum,JHEP11(2013) 120 [1310.0164]

    M. Laine,NLO thermal dilepton rate at non-zero momentum,JHEP11(2013) 120 [1310.0164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Jackson,Two-loop thermal spectral functions with general kinematics,Phys

    G. Jackson,Two-loop thermal spectral functions with general kinematics,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 116019 [1910.07552]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Shuryak,Monitoring parton equilibration in heavy ion collisions via dilepton polarization, 1203.1012

    E. Shuryak,Monitoring parton equilibration in heavy ion collisions via dilepton polarization, 1203.1012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda and M. Strickland,Virtual photon polarization in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C95(2017) 044907 [1702.05906]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Speranza, M

    E. Speranza, M. Z´ et´ enyi and B. Friman,Polarization and dilepton anisotropy in pion-nucleon collisions,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 282 [1605.04954]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Speranza, A

    E. Speranza, A. Jaiswal and B. Friman,Virtual photon polarization and dilepton anisotropy in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions,Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 395 [1802.02479]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Wei and L

    M. Wei and L. Yan,Weak magnetic field effect on dilepton polarization in heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 054024 [2406.10041]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    F. Seck, B. Friman, T. Galatyuk, H. van Hees, R. Rapp, E. Speranza et al.,Polarization of thermal dilepton radiation,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139267 [2309.03189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    X.-Y. Wu, H. Gao, B. Forster, C. Gale, G. Jackson and S. Jeon,Thermal Dilepton Polarization and Dynamics of the QCD Plasma in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 242301 [2412.15052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Gao, X.-Y

    H. Gao, X.-Y. Wu, C. Gale, G. Jackson and S. Jeon,The polarization of thermal dileptons emitted in high-energy heavy-ion collisions,2605.30180

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Coquet, M

    M. Coquet, M. Winn, X. Du, J.-Y. Ollitrault and S. Schlichting,Dilepton Polarization as a Signature of Plasma Anisotropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 232301 [2309.00555]. [41]NA60collaboration,First results on angular distributions of thermal dileptons in nuclear collisions,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 222301 [0812.3100]. [42]HADEScollaboration,Dielectron produ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Weldon,Reformulation of finite temperature dilepton production,Phys

    H.A. Weldon,Reformulation of finite temperature dilepton production,Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 2384

    1990

  40. [40]

    McLerran and T

    L.D. McLerran and T. Toimela,Photon and Dilepton Emission from the Quark - Gluon Plasma: Some General Considerations,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 545

    1985

  41. [41]

    Jiang and J

    Y. Jiang and J. Liao,Pairing Phase Transitions of Matter under Rotation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(2016) 192302 [1606.03808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Ambrus and E

    V.E. Ambrus and E. Winstanley,Rotating fermions inside a cylindrical boundary,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 104014 [1512.05239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Ambru¸ s and M.N

    V.E. Ambru¸ s and M.N. Chernodub,Rigidly rotating scalar fields: Between real divergence and imaginary fractalization,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 085016 [2304.05998]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Ayala, L.A

    A. Ayala, L.A. Hern´ andez, K. Raya and R. Zamora,Fermion propagator in a rotating environment,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 076021 [2102.03476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Vilenkin,QUANTUM FIELD THEORY AT FINITE TEMPERATURE IN A ROTATING SYSTEM,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,QUANTUM FIELD THEORY AT FINITE TEMPERATURE IN A ROTATING SYSTEM,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 2260. – 18 –

    1980

  46. [46]

    Miransky and I.A

    V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy,Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals,Phys. Rept.576(2015) 1 [1503.00732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Wang and I.A

    X. Wang and I.A. Shovkovy,Photon and dilepton emission anisotropy for a magnetized quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 056008 [2307.07557]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Speranza,Virtual photon polarization and dilepton anisotropy in pion-nucleon and heavy-ion collisions, Ph.D

    E. Speranza,Virtual photon polarization and dilepton anisotropy in pion-nucleon and heavy-ion collisions, Ph.D. thesis, Darmstadt, Tech. U., 2018. 10.15120/GSI-2018-01176

    work page doi:10.15120/gsi-2018-01176 2018

  49. [49]

    Yang, R.-H

    Y.-G. Yang, R.-H. Fang, Q. Wang and X.-N. Wang,Quark coalescence model for polarized vector mesons and baryons,Phys. Rev. C97(2018) 034917 [1711.06008]. – 19 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018