Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Causal Fermion Systems: Spacetime as the web of correlations of a many-body quantum system

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that spacetime in a causal fermion system is entirely relational—it is the web of two-point correlations of a many-body fermionic system—and that minimizing the causal action amounts to minimizing fluctuations in those…

desk verdict A genuinely new algebraic observation about the CFS Lagrangian is buried in a paper whose central interpretive claim outruns the evidence; worth serious refereeing, but the variance identity has a gap that needs to be fixed or explicitly restricted. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19272 v1 pith:KE4LX3LI submitted 2025-04-27 math-ph math.MP

Patrick Fischer , Claudio F. Paganini This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 81P0581T2083C45
keywords causalfermionsystemsrelationalspacetimefermionicprojectortwo-pointcorrelationsactionprincipleminimalfluctuationsemergenceofmany-bodyquantumsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a causal fermion system should be read as a many-body quantum system in which spacetime is nothing but the web of two-point correlations among fermionic states. The central technical claim is that in a relevant class of systems, which includes the regularized Minkowski vacuum, the causal action that governs the dynamics equals four times the variance of the two-point correlation operator, so minimizing the action is minimizing the fluctuations of the causal correlations. If this reading is right, classical spacetime is not a container but a statistical approximation: it emerges in the large-N limit as the correlation strength becomes equipartitioned, in analogy with pressure or temperature. The paper also proposes an ontology in which only fermion positions are beables, and all fields are emergent observables inferred from the change in those positions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the closed chain $A_{xy}=P(x,y)P(y,x)$ (equivalently the operator product $xy$), together with the local correlation map $F[g,A,\dots]:M\to\mathcal{F}_n$ that sends classical spacetime points into operators. The closed chain aggregates the one-particle information-transfer operators and has the same eigenvalues as $xy$, so it determines both the causal relation and the Lagrangian. The variance identity $L(x,y)=4\,\mathrm{Var}_\Omega[\tilde A_{xy}]$ is the key equation: it turns the variational principle into a statistical statement about correlations. This is supplemented by the position observables $O(U)=\int_U \pi_x\,d\rho(x)$, the one-particle spacetimes $M_u=\operatorname{supp}\rho_u$, and the probe-background split $H=H_P\oplus H_B$, which together provide the ontology and the description of experiments.

What would settle it

Compute both sides of $L(x,y)=4\,\mathrm{Var}_\Omega[\tilde A_{xy}]$ by direct diagonalization of the closed chain for a regularized causal fermion system whose fermionic projector is not of the restricted form $P=i\alpha\not\xi+\beta$; a single pair of timelike-separated points where the two sides differ would show the identity is restricted to the vector-scalar ansatz, while agreement across all such points would extend the equivalence beyond the proven case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The article's central claim is that causal fermion systems are a completely relational theory: every spacetime point is an operator encoding the correlations of all occupied states at that point, and the kernel of the fermionic projector $P(x,y)$ is the fermionic two-point correlator, equal (in Minkowski space, up to a factor) to the standard free-fermion two-point function. The closed chain $A_{xy}=P(x,y)P(y,x)$ carries the causal correlation information between $x$ and $y$. Proposition 4.1 shows that when the projector has the restricted vector-scalar form $P(x,y)=i\alpha(x,y)\not\xi+\beta(x,y)$, the causal Lagrangian is $L(x,y)=4\,\mathrm{Var}_\Omega[\tilde A_{xy}]$, so the causal action principle becomes a principle of minimal fluctuations of the causal correlation strength. Numerical evaluation for the $i\varepsilon$-regularized Minkowski vacuum gives a total variance scaling as $\varepsilon^8$, vanishing as $\varepsilon\to0$, so classical spacetime emerges as the limit in which correlation fluctuations vanish.

Load-bearing premise

The minimal-fluctuation reading rests on the ansatz that the fermionic projector has the restricted vector-scalar form $P(x,y)=i\alpha(x,y)\not\xi+\beta(x,y)$; for generic causal fermion systems the closed chain can contain additional bilinear or tensor components, in which case the Lagrangian is not simply the variance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Minimizing the causal action becomes a statement of minimal fluctuations: the minimizer is the correlation web with the smallest possible variance of the two-point correlation strength, which gives the Euler-Lagrange equations a statistical meaning in the continuum limit.
  • Classical spacetime is an emergent, statistical object: as the number of fermionic states tends to infinity and the ultraviolet regularization is removed, the integrated variance vanishes (numerically as $\varepsilon^8$), so the effective metric and gauge fields are averages over the background correlations.
  • A fully relational ontology is available without the continuum limit: spacetime points are operators built from the correlations of occupied states, and the only beables are the (spacetime) positions of fermions, with all other fields emergent observables.
  • The framework forbids superpositions of macroscopic causal structures in the effective description: the causal relation between two points is intrinsic to the operator manifold and independent of which subsystem's spacetime is used, so no admissible continuum description contains a macroscopic superposition of causal structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the variance identity holds for a wider class of causal fermion systems than the one proven, the causal action principle becomes a fluctuation-response statement: linearized perturbations around a minimizer should obey a quantitative relation between their response and the correlation variance, which the derived effective collapse theory could test.
  • Editorial inference: the $\varepsilon^8$ scaling gives a concrete numerical probe: compute the integrated variance directly from the eigenvalues of the closed chain for the $i\varepsilon$-regularized vacuum and check that it vanishes at least as $\varepsilon^8$ as $\varepsilon\to0$; a slower or non-vanishing rate would mean the minimal-fluctuation principle is asymptotic or cut-off dependent.
  • Editorial inference: the quasi-delocalized states introduced for the probe-background split suggest a concrete route to a dark-matter/MOND duality: if fermionic-condensate dark matter is quasi-delocalized on galactic scales, it contributes to the effective volume form rather than to the matter sector, and its localization scale determines where the rotation-curve anomaly switches from a geometry e
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a relational ontology for causal fermion systems: spacetime points are operators that encode correlation information among occupied fermionic states, and the theory is read as a many-body quantum system. The authors introduce an auxiliary Hilbert space, position observables, one-particle spacetimes, localized/delocalized states, and causal correlation operators. The central technical claim is Proposition 4.1: for fermionic projectors of the restricted form P(x,y)=iα /ξ + β, the causal Lagrangian equals 4 Var_Ω[Ã_xy], so that minimizing the causal action is equivalent to minimizing fluctuations of the causal correlation strength. This is applied to the iε-regularized Minkowski vacuum, with a numerical fit l_ε ~ ε^8, supporting the conclusion that classical spacetime emerges as the limit of equipartition of correlations. The paper also discusses quantum reference frames, argues against superpositions of macroscopic causal structures, and sketches applications to dark matter.

Significance. The paper is ambitious and clearly written in its conceptual parts, and it makes a concrete mathematical claim that is worth taking seriously: under the ansatz (4.8), the CFS Lagrangian acquires a statistical interpretation as a variance of the causal-correlation operator. The construction of position observables, one-particle spacetimes, and the closed chain as a sum of information-transfer operators is explicit and provides a useful dictionary between CFS structures and many-body language. If the variance identity and its domain of validity are established, the paper would be a genuine step toward a relational ontology for CFS. However, the central proposition currently has an algebraic gap, and the numerical support is narrow. The interpretive claim that spacetime is a web of correlations is partly a reformulation of the definition of spacetime points as correlation-encoding operators; that does not make the variance identity circular, but it does mean that the ontology section is more a conceptual translation than an independent derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Proposition 4.1] The central identity L = 4 Var_Ω[Ã_xy] is not proven by the displayed argument. From A_xy = b + a_μ γ^μ + c_{μν} Σ^{μν}, the step (A_xy - b)^2 = a_μ a^μ + 2 c_{μν} c^{μν} requires that the non-scalar part of the square vanish. This is not automatic in Cl(1,3): vector-bivector anticommutators generally produce γ^5 γ^μ components; for example, (γ^0 + Σ^{12})^2 is not a scalar in the Clifford algebra. Hence the eigenvalue formula λ± = b ± sqrt(a_μ a^μ + 2 c_{μν} c^{μν}) with double degeneracy needs an additional lemma showing that the unwanted components cancel for projectors of the form (4.8). For the iε-regularized Minkowski vacuum this may be true, but the paper does not prove it and states the identity without qualification. The variance interpretation and Eq. (4.16) rest on this missing lemma. In addition, the displayed chain at the end of the proof identifies the same quantity a_μ a^μ + 2 c_{μν} c^{μν} once with Var and once with 4 Var; the factor of 4 must be fixed once the centrality issue is resolved.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.16)] The numerical support for the minimal-fluctuations claim is not yet sufficient. The computation evaluates only the ∫ L dρ part of ℓ(x) in Eq. (2.6) after explicitly neglecting the κ term; since the causal action principle involves the full ℓ(x) including the boundedness-constraint term, the plotted decline of l_ε as ε→0 does not by itself establish that the regularized vacuum is a minimizer or that the action reduces to minimal fluctuations. The figure reports a single power-law fit l_ε ≈ a ε^b with no error bars, no integration-error estimate, and no robustness check over the fitted ε range. This is the only quantitative evidence for the paper's central physical claim, and it inherits the unproved variance identity from Proposition 4.1.
  3. [Section 4.2 and abstract] The scope of the variance result is not characterized. The proof assumes the restricted ansatz P(x,y) = iα /ξ + β, and the paper states that this holds, for example, for a regularized Minkowski vacuum, but it does not define the 'relevant subset of causal fermion systems' invoked in the abstract. Since the closed chain for a generic CFS can contain additional Lorentz components (pseudoscalar, axial-vector), the conclusion that minimizing the causal action is minimizing fluctuations is established, at best, for a family that is not explicitly specified. The authors should either prove that the relevant class, including the continuum limit, always admits the form (4.8), or state the result as explicitly conditional on that class.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Definition 3.1 and heading] 'Auxillary' should be 'Auxiliary'; the same typo appears in the section heading.
  2. [Eq. (3.6)] 'conincides' should be 'coincides'.
  3. [Section 4.1, Eqs. (4.3)-(4.6)] The functions α and β involve modified Bessel functions of z = m√(−(y−x)^2); for spacelike separations this requires a specification of the branch or analytic continuation, and the later substitution z = m√(−ξ^2) with complex ξ should be defined carefully.
  4. [Figure 2] The axis label uses both l_ε and l_ǫ; the fit parameters a = 2.7·10^-8 and b = 8 are quoted without uncertainties, and the numerical integration method is not described.
  5. [References] References [35] and [71] are cited as '(unpublished)' and 'unpublished notes'; these should be replaced by available preprints or removed.
  6. [Section 5.1.2] The statement that changing the reference frame to H_P ⊕ H_B barely affects the effective description because dim H_B ≫ dim H_P is a heuristic dimensional argument; a precise formulation would be needed before it can support the claimed incompatibility with scenarios such as [113].

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the variance identity is a genuine, if gapped, algebraic reformulation; the relational ontology is partly definitional.

  1. self definitional [Section 2, after Definition 2.1; also Section 6, first paragraph]
    "An element x in Fn encodes the correlations of all states in the Hilbert space at a point. we therefore identify this correlation information with a potential point in spacetime. ... This web of correlations is the only thing that makes up spacetime in perfect alignment with Mach’s principle."

    The paper's central ontological conclusion, that spacetime is the web of correlations of a many-body quantum system, is built into the definitions: spacetime points are introduced as operators that encode correlations, and spacetime is defined as the support of the measure on such operators. Thus the conclusion is a paraphrase of the setup rather than a derived result. This is a mild interpretive circularity, not a load-bearing mathematical one, because the variance identity in Proposition 4.1 does not depend on this ontological gloss.

full rationale

The main mathematical claim, Proposition 4.1, rewrites the causal-action Lagrangian as 4 Var_Omega[tilde A_xy] under the ansatz (4.8). This is an algebraic identity, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction: no quantity is fit to a subset of data and then used to predict a closely related quantity. The identity would follow from the stated ansatz together with the unproved centrality condition (Axy - b)^2 = a_mu a^mu + 2 c_mu nu c^mu nu and the double degeneracy of the eigenvalues. That missing algebraic lemma is a correctness gap, not circularity: the equality is a genuine derivation once the condition is supplied, and it does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The numerical section is an evaluation of the derived integral, and the fitted power law l_eps ~ eps^8 is a numerical result, not an input disguised as a prediction; the paper explicitly states that it neglects the kappa term in Section 4.3. Self-citations are present but not load-bearing for the central claim: [33] supplies the continuum-limit background, [35] is an unpublished canonical construction used only for the auxiliary Hilbert space, and [40] is motivational. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled in solely by citation. The paper also flags its own limitations, including in Section 6(2) that it is unclear how to define a notion of distance, and in Section 6(7) that the concept of information was deployed loosely; these are honest incompleteness statements, not circular steps. The only circular element is the ontological framing: because spacetime points are defined as correlation-encoding operators, calling spacetime a web of correlations is partly a restatement of Definition 2.1. This contributes a small score, while the variance derivation itself remains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on the CFS definition of spacetime points as correlation operators, an assumed local correlation map, a specific ansatz for the fermionic projector, and numerical work that neglects one of the constraint terms. These are mostly imported from or added to the prior CFS framework rather than derived here.

free parameters (2)
  • Power law prefactor a = a = 2.7e-08
    Fitted to the numerical values of l_epsilon in Section 4.3; the prefactor is part of the evidence that the variance vanishes as a power of the regularization scale.
  • Power law exponent b = b = 8
    Fitted in Section 4.3; the conclusion that the variance goes to zero in the limit epsilon to 0 uses this fitted exponent.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence of the local correlation map F[g,A,...]: M to F_n from classical spacetime with metric and matter fields into the operator manifold.
    Invoked in Section 2, Eqs (2.1)-(2.3); the map turns classical points into correlation operators and is assumed, not derived. The ontology depends on it.
  • domain assumption Correlation strength encodes causal distance, following Kempf et al.
    Stated in Section 1: 'we assume a correspondence between the correlation strength and the causal distance'; this physical postulate is imported without derivation in the CFS setting.
  • ad hoc to paper Restricted form of the fermionic projector P(x,y)=i alpha(x,y) gamma dot xi + beta(x,y) with complex vector xi.
    Assumed in Section 4.2, Eq (4.8) to prove Proposition 4.1. It restricts the class of CFS under consideration; the paper notes it holds for the regularized Minkowski vacuum but not for generic CFS.
  • ad hoc to paper Neglect of the kappa term in the numerical evaluation.
    Section 4.3: 'we neglect the kappa term'; this discards the boundedness-constraint contribution to l(x), and its effect on the fitted power law is not assessed.
  • domain assumption Canonical construction of the extended Hilbert space H subset H tilde exists.
    Used for Definition 3.1 and the N-particle interpretation; the cited construction [35] is unpublished, so the embedding is not independently checkable from this preprint.
  • domain assumption In the continuum limit the Minkowski vacuum corresponds to occupying all negative-energy Dirac solutions and the unregularized fermionic projector is a two-point correlation function.
    Imported from CFS literature in Section 4 and used to identify the fermionic projector with the two-point correlator; not derived here.
invented entities (3)
  • Auxiliary Hilbert space H tilde with projection Omega
    purpose: Represents the CFS as an N-fermion many-body state and embeds perturbed systems.
    Introduced in Definition 3.1 as a formal enlargement. No falsifiable consequence is attached; the paper itself notes it 'might seem arbitrary'.
  • One-particle spacetime M_u = supp rho_u
    purpose: Decomposes total spacetime into a superposition of per-state spacetimes and supports localized and delocalized probe definitions.
    Defined in Section 3.2 via the position observable; an interpretive construct with no independent empirical handle.
  • Quasi-localized states
    purpose: Weakened localization condition used in Section 5.1.1 to assign fermionic condensate dark matter states to the background and speculate on a dark matter and MOND duality.
    Introduced without quantitative criterion or independent evidence; the MOND connection is explicitly speculative in Section 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Causal Fermion Systems: Spacetime as the web of correlations of a many-body quantum system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KE4LX3LI

@misc{pith2026250419272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Causal Fermion Systems: Spacetime as the web of correlations of a many-body quantum system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KE4LX3LI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19272}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we argue that spacetime in causal fermion systems can be understood as the web of correlations of a many-body quantum system.This argument highlights the fact that causal fermion systems is a completely relational theory. We also explain how our perception of a background (spacetime) emerges in the limit where the number of states taken in consideration goes to infinity. This thereby constitutes a complete viable ontology for causal fermion systems which are not reliant on the continuum limit. A key insight is the fact that in a relevant subset of causal fermion systems, which includes the continuum limit of the Minkowski vacuum spacetime, minimization of the causal action can be understood as a minimization of fluctuations in the causal structure of spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19272 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. This visualization shows associated one particle spacetime Mu of a state |ui ∈ H. The spacetime region U intersects Mu completely. Thus, by Definition 3.13, |ui is localized in U. In addition, |ui is not delocalized in the sense of Definition 3.14. To help with intuition we chose the full spacetime to be the continuum limit of Minkowski space. In general U and Mu are subsets of an abstract CFS spacetime M. The last … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The plot shows the numerical integration of expression of equation (4.19) for different values of mε. The numerical values are fitted using the function ε 7→ aεb with a = 2.7 · 10−8 and b = 8. neglect the κ term. In addition, we have to fix the two scaling degrees of freedom [22], which come from the invariance under ρ(Ω) → σρ Ω λ  . First, we restrict the spacetime to a box with edge length L and choose σ such tha… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Construction of Currents in Causal Fermion Systems

    math-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A probing construction on the linearized causal action recovers Maxwell's equations at rank one, with coupling independent of the regularization length.

  2. Emergent Gravity from Topological Quantum Field Theory: Stochastic Gradient Flow Perspective away from the Quantum Gravity Problem

    gr-qc 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A stochastic gradient flow of Wilczek's pre-geometric theory is claimed to interpolate between an infrared fixed point given by General Relativity and an ultraviolet fixed point given by a topological BF theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quantum reference frames from top-do wn crossed products

    S. Ali Ahmad et al. “Quantum reference frames from top-do wn crossed products”. In: Physical Review D 110.6 (2024), p. 065003

    2024

  2. [2]

    Principle of relative locali ty

    G. Amelino-Camelia et al. “Principle of relative locali ty”. In: Phys- ical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmolog y 84.8 (2011), p. 084010

    2011

  3. [3]

    Fakeons, microcausality and the classical limit of quan- tum gravity

    D. Anselmi. “Fakeons, microcausality and the classical limit of quan- tum gravity”. In: Classical and Quantum Gravity 36.6 (2019), p. 065010

    2019

  4. [4]

    Renormalization and causality violations in classical gravity coupled with quantum matter

    D. Anselmi. “Renormalization and causality violations in classical gravity coupled with quantum matter”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2007.01 (2007), p. 062

    2007

  5. [5]

    Quantum gravity, fakeons and mic rocausal- ity

    D. Anselmi and M. Piva. “Quantum gravity, fakeons and mic rocausal- ity”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2018.11 (2018), pp. 1–20

    2018

  6. [6]

    Quantum Reference Frames for Lorentz Symmetry

    L. Apadula, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner. “Quantum Reference Frames for Lorentz Symmetry”. In: Quantum 8 (Aug. 2024), p. 1440. issn: 2521-327X. doi: 10.22331/q-2024-08-14-1440 . url: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-

    doi:10.22331/q-2024-08-14-1440 2024

  7. [7]

    Ashcroft and N

    N.W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin. Solid state physics . Sauders College Publishing, 1976

    1976

  8. [8]

    Three principles of quantum gravity in the cond ensed mat- ter approach

    J. Bain. “Three principles of quantum gravity in the cond ensed mat- ter approach”. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2014), pp. 154–163. 36 REFERENCES

    2014

Show all 112 references
  1. [9]

    New Prospects for a Causally Local Formu lation of Quantum Theory

    J. A. Barandes. “New Prospects for a Causally Local Formu lation of Quantum Theory”. In: axiv:2402.16935 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    J. A. Barandes. The Stochastic-Quantum Correspondence. 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Referen ce frames, superselection rules, and quantum information

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens. “Referen ce frames, superselection rules, and quantum information”. In: Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 79.2 (2007), pp. 555–609

    2007

  4. [12]

    Search for Pauli Exclusion Principle v iolations with Gator at LNGS

    L. Baudis et al. “Search for Pauli Exclusion Principle v iolations with Gator at LNGS”. In: The European Physical Journal C 84.11 (2024), p. 1137

    2024

  5. [13]

    Local quantum measurement and relativity

    Christian Beck. Local quantum measurement and relativity . PUBDB- 2023-05498. Springer, 2021

    2023

  6. [14]

    On the structure of minimize rs of causal variational principles in the non-compact and equivariant settings

    Y. Bernard and F. Finster. “On the structure of minimize rs of causal variational principles in the non-compact and equivariant settings”. In: arXiv:1205.0403 [math-ph], Adv. Calc. Var. 7.1 (2014), pp. 27–57

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Visions in Quantum Gravity

    L. Buoninfante et al. “Visions in Quantum Gravity”. In: arXiv:2412.08696 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Operationa l quantum reference frame transformations

    T. Carette, J. Glowacki, and L. Loveridge. “Operationa l quantum reference frame transformations”. In: Quantum 9 (2025), p. 1680

    2025

  9. [17]

    The Sum over topologies in three-dimension al Euclidean quantum gravity

    S. Carlip. “The Sum over topologies in three-dimension al Euclidean quantum gravity”. In: Classical and Quantum Gravity 10.2 (1993), p. 207

    1993

  10. [18]

    Dirac and Weyl Fermions–the Only Causal Systems

    D. P. L. Castrigiano. “Dirac and Weyl Fermions–the Only Causal Systems”. In: arXiv:1711.06556 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A direct empirical proof of the existenc e of dark matter

    D. Clowe et al. “A direct empirical proof of the existenc e of dark matter”. In: The Astrophysical Journal 648.2 (2006), p. L109

    2006

  12. [20]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A )

    Planck Collaboration. “Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A )”. In: A&A 594 (2016), A13

    2016

  13. [21]

    Renormalizability, fun damentality, and a final theory: The role of UV-completion in the search for quan- tum gravity

    K. Crowther and N. Linnemann. “Renormalizability, fun damentality, and a final theory: The role of UV-completion in the search for quan- tum gravity”. In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Two-dimension al area and matter flux in the theory of causal fermion systems

    E. Curiel, F. Finster, and J.M. Isidro. “Two-dimension al area and matter flux in the theory of causal fermion systems”. In: arXiv:1910.06161 [math-ph], Internat. J. Modern Phys. D 29 (2020), p. 2050098

    2020 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Linearized fields for caus al variational principles: Existence theory and causal structure

    C. Dappiaggi and F. Finster. “Linearized fields for caus al variational principles: Existence theory and causal structure”. In: arXiv:1811.10587 [math-ph], Methods Appl. Anal. 27.1 (2020), pp. 1–56

    2020 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Holographic mixing and Fock space d ynamics of causal fermion systems

    C. Dappiaggi et al. “Holographic mixing and Fock space d ynamics of causal fermion systems”. In: arXiv:2410.18045 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Quantization of mea sure in gravitation

    V. Dzhunushaliev and V. Folomeev. “Quantization of mea sure in gravitation”. In: Gravitation and Cosmology 29.4 (2023), pp. 367– 373. REFERENCES 37

    2023

  18. [27]

    Quantum measure as a nec- essary ingredient in quantum gravity and modified gravities

    V. Dzhunushaliev and V. Folomeev. “Quantum measure as a nec- essary ingredient in quantum gravity and modified gravities ”. In: arXiv:2312.17546 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [28]

    The ontology of Bohmian mechanics

    M. Esfeld et al. “The ontology of Bohmian mechanics”. In : The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2014)

    2014

  20. [29]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka. Quantum theory of many-particle systems. Courier Corporation, 2012

    2012

  21. [30]

    Quantum reference frames, measure ment schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory

    C. J. Fewster et al. “Quantum reference frames, measure ment schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory”. In: Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics 406.1 (2025), pp. 1–81

    2025

  22. [31]

    Perturbative Quantum Field Theory in the F ramework of the Fermionic Projector

    F. Finster. “Perturbative Quantum Field Theory in the F ramework of the Fermionic Projector”. In: arXiv:1310.4121, Journal of Mathe- matical Physics 55.4 (2014), p. 042301

    2014 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Positive functionals induced by minimize rs of causal vari- ational principles

    F. Finster. “Positive functionals induced by minimize rs of causal vari- ational principles”. In: Vietnam Journal of Mathematics 47 (2019), pp. 23–37

    2019

  24. [33]

    F. Finster. The Continuum Limit of Causal Fermion Systems . Vol. 186. arXiv:1605.04742, Fundamental Theories of Physics. Sprin ger, 2016, pp. xi+548

    2016 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Baryogenesis i n Minkowski spacetime

    F. Finster and M. van den Beld-Serrano. “Baryogenesis i n Minkowski spacetime”. In: Journal of Geometry and Physics 207 (2025), p. 105346

    2025

  26. [35]

    A canonical construction of the extended Hilbert space for causal fermion systems

    F. Finster and P. Fischer. “A canonical construction of the extended Hilbert space for causal fermion systems”. In: (unpublished) (2025)

    2025

  27. [36]

    Modified me asures as an effective theory for causal fermion systems

    F. Finster, E. Guendelman, and C. Paganini. “Modified me asures as an effective theory for causal fermion systems”. In: arXiv:2303.16566, Classical and Quantum Gravity 41.3 (2024), pp. 035007, 25

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    A Mechanism of Baryoge- nesis for Causal Fermion Systems

    F. Finster, M. Jokel, and C. F. Paganini. “A Mechanism of Baryoge- nesis for Causal Fermion Systems”. In: arXiv:2111.05556, Classical and Quantum Gravity (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  29. [38]

    A gauge fixing procedure f or causal fermion systems

    F. Finster and S. Kindermann. “A gauge fixing procedure f or causal fermion systems”. In: arXiv:1908.08445 [math-ph], J. Math. Phys. 61.8 (2020), p. 082301

    2020 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Finster, S

    F. Finster, S. Kindermann, and J.-H. Treude. Causal Fermion Sys- tems: An Introduction to Fundamental Structures, Methods an d Ap- plications. arXiv:2411.06450 [math-ph]. 2024

    2024

  31. [40]

    Causal ferm ion systems as an effective collapse theory

    F. Finster, J. Kleiner, and C. F. Paganini. “Causal ferm ion systems as an effective collapse theory”. In: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57.39 (2024), p. 395303

    2024

  32. [42]

    Construction of global soluti ons to the lin- earized field equations for causal variational principles

    F. Finster and M. Kraus. “Construction of global soluti ons to the lin- earized field equations for causal variational principles” . In: arXiv:2210.16665 [math-ph], Methods Appl. Anal. 30.2 (2023), pp. 77–94. 38 REFERENCES

    2023 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Banach manifold structure a nd infinite- dimensional analysis for causal fermion systems

    F. Finster and M. Lottner. “Banach manifold structure a nd infinite- dimensional analysis for causal fermion systems”. In: arXiv:2101.11908 [math-ph], Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 60.2 (2021), pp. 313–354

    2021 arXiv

  34. [44]

    The fermionic sign ature op- erator and quantum states in Rindler space-time

    F. Finster, S. Murro, and C. R¨ oken. “The fermionic sign ature op- erator and quantum states in Rindler space-time”. In: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 454.1 (2017), pp. 385–411

    2017

  35. [45]

    Incompatibility of freq uency split- ting and spatial localization: a quantitative analysis of H egerfeldt’s theorem

    F. Finster and C. F. Paganini. “Incompatibility of freq uency split- ting and spatial localization: a quantitative analysis of H egerfeldt’s theorem”. In: Annales Henri Poincar´ e. Vol. 24. 2. Springer. 2023, pp. 413–467

    2023

  36. [46]

    A non-perturbative constr uction of the Fermionic projector on globally hyperbolic manifolds I-Sp ace-times of finite lifetime

    F. Finster and M. Reintjes. “A non-perturbative constr uction of the Fermionic projector on globally hyperbolic manifolds I-Sp ace-times of finite lifetime”. In: arXiv:1301.5420 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Causal fermion systems and the ETH app roach to quantum theory

    F. Finster et al. “Causal fermion systems and the ETH app roach to quantum theory”. In: Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-S 14.5 (2021), p. 1717

    2021

  38. [48]

    Relativity and decohere nce of spacetime superpositions

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych. “Relativity and decohere nce of spacetime superpositions”. In: arXiv:2302.03259 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Schr¨ odinger’s cat for d e Sit- ter spacetime

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych. “Schr¨ odinger’s cat for d e Sit- ter spacetime”. In: Classical and Quantum Gravity 38.11 (2021), p. 115010

    2021

  40. [50]

    Quantum Signatures of Black Hole Mass Supe rpo- sitions

    J. Foo et al. “Quantum Signatures of Black Hole Mass Supe rpo- sitions”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (18 Oct. 2022), p. 181301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.181301. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett

    2022 doi

  41. [51]

    Quantum superpositions of Minkowski spac etime

    J. Foo et al. “Quantum superpositions of Minkowski spac etime”. In: Physical Review D 107.4 (2023), p. 045014

    2023

  42. [52]

    Gravitons and light cone fluctuations

    L. H. Ford. “Gravitons and light cone fluctuations”. In: Phys. Rev. D 51 (4 1995), pp. 1692–1700. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1692. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1692

    1995 doi

  43. [53]

    Spacetime metric and lightcone fluctuation s

    L. H. Ford. “Spacetime metric and lightcone fluctuation s”. In: Inter- national Journal of Theoretical Physics 38.11 (1999), pp. 2941–2958

    1999

  44. [54]

    To be or not to be, but where?

    G. Franzmann. “To be or not to be, but where?” In: arXiv:2405.21031 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  45. [55]

    A Brief Review of the “ETH-Approach to Qu antum Mechanics

    J. Fr¨ ohlich. “A Brief Review of the “ETH-Approach to Qu antum Mechanics””. In: arXiv:1905.06603 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  46. [56]

    Relativistic Quantum Theory

    J. Fr¨ ohlich. “Relativistic Quantum Theory”. In: arXiv:1912.00726 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  47. [57]

    THINGS about MoND

    G. Gentile, B. Famaey, and W. J. G. de Blok. “THINGS about MoND”. In: Astronomy & Astrophysics 527 (2011), A76

    2011

  48. [58]

    Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference fra mes

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner. “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference fra mes”. In: Nature communications 10.1 (2019), p. 494

    2019

  49. [59]

    Why Bohmian mechanics? One-and two-time pos ition mea- surements, Bell inequalities, philosophy, and physics

    N. Gisin. “Why Bohmian mechanics? One-and two-time pos ition mea- surements, Bell inequalities, philosophy, and physics”. I n: Entropy 20.2 (2018), p. 105. REFERENCES 39

    2018

  50. [60]

    Quantum Gravity on the comp uter: Impressions of a workshop

    L. Glaser and S. Steinhaus. “Quantum Gravity on the comp uter: Impressions of a workshop”. In: Universe 5.1 (2019), p. 35

    2019

  51. [61]

    Diffeomorphism- invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling b ulk locality with general covariance

    C. Goeller, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin. “Diffeomorphism- invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling b ulk locality with general covariance”. In: arXiv:2206.01193 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Probability theories with dynamic causal st ructure: a new framework for quantum gravity

    L. Hardy. “Probability theories with dynamic causal st ructure: a new framework for quantum gravity”. In: arXiv:gr-qc/0509120 (2005)

    2005 arXiv

  53. [63]

    Towards quantum gravity: a framework for pro babilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure

    L. Hardy. “Towards quantum gravity: a framework for pro babilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure”. In: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40.12 (2007), p. 3081

    2007

  54. [64]

    Foundations of the self- force problem in arbitrary dimensions

    A. I. Harte, P. Taylor, and ´E. ´E. Flanagan. “Foundations of the self- force problem in arbitrary dimensions”. In: Physical Review D 97.12 (2018), p. 124053

    2018

  55. [65]

    Spacetime quantum mechanics and the quan tum me- chanics of spacetime

    J. B. Hartle. “Spacetime quantum mechanics and the quan tum me- chanics of spacetime”. In: Gravitation and Quantizations, Session L VII of Les Houches (1995), p. 285

    1995

  56. [66]

    Remark on causality and particle loc alization

    G. C. Hegerfeldt. “Remark on causality and particle loc alization”. In: Physical Review D 10.10 (1974), p. 3320

    1974

  57. [67]

    Quantum Temporal Superposition : The Case of Quantum Field Theory

    L. J. Henderson et al. “Quantum Temporal Superposition : The Case of Quantum Field Theory”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (13 Sept. 2020), p. 131602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.131602. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103

    2020 doi

  58. [68]

    Quantum Frame Re lativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics

    P. A. Hoehn, I. Kotecha, and F. M. Mele. “Quantum Frame Re lativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics”. In: arXiv:2308.09131 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Gravitation as a Statis- tical Theory on the Light Cone

    J. M. Isidro, C. F. Paganini, and A. Pesci. “Gravitation as a Statis- tical Theory on the Light Cone”. In: arXiv:2407.13317 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  60. [70]

    Complex, Lorentzian, and Euclidean simplicia l quantum grav- ity: numerical methods and physical prospects

    D. Jia. “Complex, Lorentzian, and Euclidean simplicia l quantum grav- ity: numerical methods and physical prospects”. In: Classical and Quantum Gravity 39.6 (2022), p. 065002

    2022

  61. [71]

    Quantum gravity and time order

    D. Jia. “Quantum gravity and time order”. In: unpublished notes ()

  62. [72]

    World quantum gravity: quantum test objects an d Synge’s world function

    D. Jia. “World quantum gravity: quantum test objects an d Synge’s world function”. In: Classical and Quantum Gravity 38.21 (2021), p. 215001

    2021

  63. [73]

    R. E. Kastner. The transactional interpretation of quantum mechan- ics: a relativistic treatment . Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  64. [74]

    Replacing the notion of spacetime distance b y the notion of correlation

    A. Kempf. “Replacing the notion of spacetime distance b y the notion of correlation”. In: Frontiers in Physics 9 (2021), p. 655857

    2021

  65. [75]

    Quantum refere nce frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the t hird particle

    M. Krumm, P. A. H¨ ohn, and M. P. M¨ uller. “Quantum refere nce frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the t hird particle”. In: Quantum 5 (Aug. 2021), p. 530. issn: 2521-327X. doi: 10.22331/q-2021-08-27-530 . url: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-08-27-530

    2021 doi

  66. [76]

    Quantum reference frames, rev isited

    M. J. Lake and M. Miller. “Quantum reference frames, rev isited”. In: arXiv:2312.03811 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  67. [77]

    Open problems in relational quantum mecha nics

    F. Laudisa. “Open problems in relational quantum mecha nics”. In: Journal for General Philosophy of Science 50.2 (2019), pp. 215–230. 40 REFERENCES

    2019

  68. [78]

    Position measurements and the empiric al status of particles in Bohmian mechanics

    D. Lazarovici. “Position measurements and the empiric al status of particles in Bohmian mechanics”. In: Philosophy of Science 87.3 (2020), pp. 409–424

    2020

  69. [79]

    Link to web platform on causal fermion systems: www.cau sal-fermion- system.com

  70. [80]

    Nonperturbative sum over topolo- gies in 2D Lorentzian quantum gravity

    R. Loll, W. Westra, and S. Zohren. “Nonperturbative sum over topolo- gies in 2D Lorentzian quantum gravity”. In: AIP Conference Proceed- ings. Vol. 861. 1. American Institute of Physics. 2006, pp. 391–3 97

    2006

  71. [81]

    Fact-nets: towards a mathema tical frame- work for relational quantum mechanics

    P. Martin-Dussaud et al. “Fact-nets: towards a mathema tical frame- work for relational quantum mechanics”. In: Foundations of Physics 53.1 (2023), p. 26

    2023

  72. [82]

    High sensitivity tests of the Pauli Exc lusion Princi- ple with VIP2

    J. Marton et al. “High sensitivity tests of the Pauli Exc lusion Princi- ple with VIP2”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series . Vol. 631

  73. [83]

    IOP Publishing. 2015, p. 012070

    2015

  74. [84]

    The baryonic Tully–Fisher relation of g as-rich galax- ies as a test of ΛCDM and MOND

    S. S. McGaugh. “The baryonic Tully–Fisher relation of g as-rich galax- ies as a test of ΛCDM and MOND”. In: The Astronomical Journal 143.2 (2012), p. 40

    2012

  75. [85]

    A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis

    M. Milgrom. “A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis”. In: Astrophysical Journal 270 (1983), pp. 365–370

    1983

  76. [86]

    Ultra-diffuse cluster galaxies as key to the MOND cluster conundrum

    M. Milgrom. “Ultra-diffuse cluster galaxies as key to the MOND cluster conundrum”. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society 454.4 (Oct. 2015), pp. 3810–3815. issn: 0035-8711. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2202. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/454/4/38 ...

    2015 doi

  77. [87]

    What is Fundamental in Fundamental Physics?

    A. Niederklapfer. “What is Fundamental in Fundamental Physics?” In: (2024)

    2024

  78. [88]

    The bundle theory approach to relationa l quantum mechanics

    A. Oldofredi. “The bundle theory approach to relationa l quantum mechanics”. In: Foundations of physics 51.1 (2021), p. 18

    2021

  79. [89]

    Quantum influences and event r elativ- ity

    N. Ormrod and J. Barrett. “Quantum influences and event r elativ- ity”. In: arXiv:2401.18005 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  80. [90]

    Probing the Planck scale: the modifica tion of the time evolution operator due to the quantum structure of spac etime

    T. Padmanabhan. “Probing the Planck scale: the modifica tion of the time evolution operator due to the quantum structure of spac etime”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2020.11 (2020), pp. 1–26

    2020

  81. [91]

    Proposal 42: A New Storyline for the Uni verse Based on the Causal Fermion Systems Framework

    C. F. Paganini. “Proposal 42: A New Storyline for the Uni verse Based on the Causal Fermion Systems Framework”. In: Progress and Visions in Quantum Theory in View of Gravity . Springer, 2020, pp. 119–154

    2020

  82. [92]

    Localization and causality in relativistic quantum mechanics

    J. F. Perez and I. F. Wilde. “Localization and causality in relativistic quantum mechanics”. In: Physical Review D 16.2 (1977), p. 315

    1977

  83. [93]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. The advanced book program. CRC Press, 1995. 842 pp. isbn: 9780201503975

    1995

  84. [94]

    Experimental test of noncommutat ive quan- tum gravity by VIP-2 Lead

    K. Piscicchia et al. “Experimental test of noncommutat ive quan- tum gravity by VIP-2 Lead”. In: Physical Review D 107.2 (2023), p. 026002. REFERENCES 41

    2023

  85. [95]

    Strongest atomic physics bounds o n noncommu- tative quantum gravity models

    K. Piscicchia et al. “Strongest atomic physics bounds o n noncommu- tative quantum gravity models”. In: Physical Review Letters 129.13 (2022), p. 131301

    2022

  86. [96]

    Model for emergence of s pace- time from fluctuations

    M. Reitz, B. Soda, and A. Kempf. “Model for emergence of s pace- time from fluctuations”. In: Physical Review Letters 131.21 (2023), p. 211501

    2023

  87. [97]

    Relational quantum mechanics and contextu ality

    C. Robson. “Relational quantum mechanics and contextu ality”. In: Foundations of Physics 54.4 (2024), p. 54

    2024

  88. [98]

    Relational quantum mechanics

    C. Rovelli. “Relational quantum mechanics”. In: International jour- nal of theoretical physics 35 (1996), pp. 1637–1678

    1996

  89. [99]

    Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved s pace and the theory of gravitation

    A. D. Sakharov. “Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved s pace and the theory of gravitation”. In: General Relativity and Gravitation 32.2 (2000), pp. 365–367

    2000

  90. [100]

    Solid state theory

    Manfred Sigrist. “Solid state theory”. In: Lecture notes, ETH Z¨ urich 47 (2013)

    2013

  91. [101]

    Some remarks concerning the que stion of lo- calization of elementary particles

    B.-S. K. Skagerstam. “Some remarks concerning the que stion of lo- calization of elementary particles”. In: International Journal of The- oretical Physics (1976)

    1976

  92. [102]

    Large scale structure in Bekenstein ’s theory of rel- ativistic modified Newtonian dynamics

    C. Skordis et al. “Large scale structure in Bekenstein ’s theory of rel- ativistic modified Newtonian dynamics”. In: Physical Review Letters 96.1 (2006), p. 011301

    2006

  93. [103]

    Relational EPR

    M. Smerlak and C. Rovelli. “Relational EPR”. In: Foundations of Physics 37.3 (2007), pp. 427–445

    2007

  94. [104]

    Temporal relationalism

    L. Smolin. “Temporal relationalism”. In: Beyond spacetime. The foun- dations of quantum gravity (2020), pp. 143–175

    2020

  95. [105]

    Gravita tional self- force regularization in the Regge-Wheeler and easy gauges

    J. E. Thompson, B. Wardell, and B. F. Whiting. “Gravita tional self- force regularization in the Regge-Wheeler and easy gauges” . In: Phys- ical Review D 99.12 (2019), p. 124046

    2019

  96. [106]

    Origin of the particles in black-hole eva poration

    W. G. Unruh. “Origin of the particles in black-hole eva poration”. In: Phys. Rev. D 15 (2 Jan. 1977), pp. 365–369. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.365. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.365

    1977 doi

  97. [107]

    The relational ontology of contemporary physics

    F. Vidotto. “The relational ontology of contemporary physics”. In: Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality: Naturalizing Quant um The- ory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy. Springer, 2022, pp. 163–173

    2022

  98. [108]

    Sakharov’s induced gravity: a modern pers pective

    M. Visser. “Sakharov’s induced gravity: a modern pers pective”. In: Modern Physics Letters A 17.15n17 (2002), pp. 977–991

    2002

  99. [109]

    X.-G. Wen. Quantum field theory of many-body systems: From the origin of sound to an origin of light and electrons . Oxford university press, 2004

    2004

  100. [110]

    Relational formulation of quantum measur ement

    J. M. Yang. “Relational formulation of quantum measur ement”. In: International Journal of Theoretical Physics 58.3 (2019), pp. 757– 785. 42 REFERENCES

    2019

  101. [111]

    Switching Quantum Reference Frames for Qu antum Measurement

    J. M. Yang. “Switching Quantum Reference Frames for Qu antum Measurement”. In: Quantum 4 (June 2020), p. 283. issn: 2521-327X. doi: 10.22331/q-2020-06-18-283 . url: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-06-18-283

    2020 doi

  102. [112]

    Zagoskin

    A. Zagoskin. Quantum theory of many-body systems: techniques and applications, Graduate texts in physics . 2016

    2016

  103. [113]

    Quantum tensor p roduct structures are observable induced

    P. Zanardi, D. A. Lidar, and S. Lloyd. “Quantum tensor p roduct structures are observable induced”. In: Physical review letters 92.6 (2004), p. 060402

    2004

  104. [114]

    Bell’s theorem for temporal order

    M. Zych et al. “Bell’s theorem for temporal order”. In: Nature com- munications 10.1 (2019), p. 3772. ∗ F akult¨at f ¨ur Mathematik, Universit ¨at Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany Email address : patrick.fischer@ur.de † F akult¨at f ¨ur Mathematik, TU Chemnitz, D-09111 ...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.