Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2310.01432.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2310.01432 v3

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 4 of 4 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 4 of 4 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-08T16:31:38.593488Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T23:08:37.184172Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 94ed2d94-3057-45fa-ad69-0b834b671af9 · inbound

LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods cites this paper.

LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators

Reference 139

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T23:08:37.188464Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

Observation dd6b44d1-7f41-4933-8eed-74cefb1c3116 · inbound

Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering cites this paper.

Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-08T16:31:38.593488Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ca2eab54-2c32-44bf-8009-df4890752fe7 · inbound

Towards High Supervised Learning Utility Training Data Generation: Data Pruning and Column Reordering cites this paper.

Towards High Supervised Learning Utility Training Data Generation: Data Pruning and Column Reordering Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:43:53.750706Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 783c3686-a4ea-48aa-ad9a-d341968b90da · inbound

MARS-RA: Rank Aggregation for Credit Assignment via Multimodal Comparisons in Embodied Multi-Agent Cooperation cites this paper.

MARS-RA: Rank Aggregation for Credit Assignment via Multimodal Comparisons in Embodied Multi-Agent Cooperation Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators

Reference 97

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-07-31T21:55:17.464995Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.