Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Photon emission from rotating plasmas: a generalized McLerran-Toimela formula and the onset of superradiance

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A uniformly rotating plasma emits and absorbs photons according to a new master formula, Eq.

desk verdict Tuchin's generalized McLerran-Toimela formula for rotating plasmas is a genuine new result, and the superradiance mechanism is plausible, but the local-translational-invariance assumption is only marginally satisfied at the quoted QGP parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12098 v1 pith:KMR6T4FD submitted 2026-08-12 hep-ph nucl-th

Kirill Tuchin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords rotatingplasmaphotonemissionsuperradiancequark-gluonMcLerran-Toimelaformulacylindricalwavespolarizationtensorellipticflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the photon emission and absorption rates of a plasma rotating rigidly with angular velocity $\Omega$, expressing them through the rotating plasma's photon polarization tensor. The central result is a rotating-plasma analogue of the McLerran-Toimela formula. It implies that photons with energy below $m\Omega$ are emitted more often than they are absorbed, the phenomenon of superradiance. In a rotating quark-gluon plasma, the leading photon emission starts at one-loop order rather than two-loop order, producing a significantly larger soft-photon yield than a non-rotating plasma. This could explain the excess direct photons seen in heavy-ion collisions and predicts a spike of sub-10 MeV photons from superradiant amplification of the magnetic field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is $\operatorname{Im}\Pi_T(q_0,q)$, the imaginary part of the transverse retarded photon polarization tensor in the plasma rest frame, evaluated at the shifted frequency $q_0=\omega-m\Omega$ and at the combined momentum $\sqrt{k_z^2+q_\perp^2}$. The companion ingredient is $f_{k_\perp,m}(q_\perp)$, the Fourier amplitude of a cylindrical photon wave (a toroidal or poloidal eigenfunction of $\mathbf L_z$ and $\nabla\times$) inside a cylinder of radius $R$; this factor restricts emission to a causal rotating domain and prevents the azimuthal sum from diverging. Together these two objects convert a current-current correlator into a differential photon rate.

What would settle it

Measure the azimuthal, elliptic flow of direct photons in the energy range 0.1–1 GeV in heavy-ion collisions: the paper predicts negative $v_2$ and a pronounced soft-photon excess over the two-loop non-rotating rate, so a measurement showing positive $v_2$ with yields matching the non-rotating baseline would rule out the rotation-enhanced one-loop mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Eq. (27), a rotating-plasma generalization of the McLerran-Toimela relation. It expresses the difference between emission and absorption rates of a photon of energy $\omega=\sqrt{k_z^2+k_\perp^2}$ and azimuthal quantum number $m$ as $$\frac{d\dot w}{2\pi k_\perp dk_\perp dk_z V} = \sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty} \int_0^\infty \frac{dq_\$perp^{2}$}{(4\pi)^2\omega} \, \frac{q_\$perp^{2}$}{k_\$perp^{2}$}\left(1+\frac{$k_z^{2}$+q_\$perp^{2}$}{\$omega^{2}$}\right) \operatorname{Im}\Pi_T\!\left(\omega-m\$\Omega$,\sqrt{$k_z^{2}$+q_\$perp^{2}$}\right) $f^{2}$_{k_\perp,m}(q_\perp) \frac{1}{\pi $R^{2}$}.$$ Because $\operatorname{Im}\Pi_T$ changes sign with its frequency argument, modes with $\omega<m\Omega$ contribute an excess of emission over absorption, which is superradiance. Because rotation shifts the frequency argument, the one-loop photon self-energy becomes finite in a rotating quark-gluon plasma, so the leading emission rate carries one fewer power of coupling than the non-rotating two-loop result. The resulting soft-photon spectrum exceeds the non-rotating baseline in the infrared, the elliptic flow is negative below roughly 1.5 GeV, and deep-infrared magnetic-field modes with $m=1,2$ grow exponentially.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the rotating plasma is locally translationally invariant, so its current-current correlator has the simple Fourier form used in the derivation; that requires the product of temperature and radius to be much larger than 1, but for the quark-gluon parameters chosen it is only about 3 to 4.5, and the same boundary that is ignored here is essential for both the mode sum and the superradiance condition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a rotating quark-gluon plasma, photon emission starts at one-loop order, one power of $\alpha_s$ earlier than in a non-rotating plasma, so the infrared photon yield is enhanced.
  • Photons with $\omega<m\Omega$ are emitted faster than they are absorbed, leading to exponential growth of those modes when a photon field is present.
  • The superradiant modes drive an instability of the magnetic field accompanying the quark-gluon plasma, potentially producing a detectable photon spike at energies below about 10 MeV.
  • The photon spectrum shows little dependence on the plasma radius $R$, and the cylinder height cancels from the result, making the prediction robust to the detailed shape of the rotating region.
  • In the non-rotating limit, first $\Omega\to 0$ and then $R\to\infty$, Eq. (27) reduces to the standard McLerran-Toimela formula.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same one-loop enhancement should appear in dilepton emission from a rotating plasma, since the same current-current spectral function enters that rate; this is a testable prediction the paper does not make.
  • A measurement of the photon energy at which the elliptic flow $v_2$ changes sign could serve as an experimental probe of the plasma's angular velocity, even where hydrodynamic vorticity is hard to measure directly.
  • The sign-change mechanism of $\operatorname{Im}\Pi_T$ at the shifted frequency is generic, so Eq. (27) could be applied to other bounded dissipative rotating systems, such as neutron-star magnetospheres or accretion disks, if their retarded polarization tensors are known.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives a formula, Eq. (27), for the difference between photon emission and absorption rates in a uniformly rotating plasma, expressing it as a sum over azimuthal modes m of integrals of Im Π_T(ω−mΩ, sqrt(k_z^2+q_perp^2)) weighted by a cylindrical boundary function f^2. It then evaluates the one-loop rotating emission spectrum, Eq. (29), for a quark-gluon plasma (Fig. 1), finding enhanced soft-photon emission relative to the non-rotating two-loop result, and argues in Sec. VI that modes satisfying ω<mΩ exhibit superradiance that exponentiates into a magnetic-field instability (Fig. 2), with m=1,2 growth at ω≲10 MeV. The paper is self-contained in its main derivation and explicitly identifies the assumptions needed to reach the final formulas.

Significance. If Eq. (27) survives scrutiny, it is a useful generalization of the McLerran-Toimela formula: it gives a transparent route from the photon polarization tensor to emission/absorption rates in a rotating plasma, it identifies a one-loop contribution that is kinematically forbidden in the non-rotating case, and it makes falsifiable predictions of enhanced soft photons and a low-frequency superradiant instability. The derivation from Wightman functions to Eq. (27) is coherent, and the paper honestly displays the parameter assumptions and the cutoff dependence of the m=0 angular average. The quantitative phenomenological claims, however, rest on two approximations that are not controlled at the quoted parameters: local translational invariance of the rotating-plasma correlator (RT≈3–4.5) and the identification of the spontaneous emission–absorption balance with exponential field growth. These issues can likely be addressed within the paper's framework, so the result is promising but not yet definitive.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II, Eq. (4); §V–VI parameters] The master formula is built on the locally translationally invariant form (4) of the Wightman correlator, justified only by the condition RT≫1. For the application values T=0.3 GeV and R=2–3 fm, RT≈3.0–4.5, which is not parametrically large. The same boundary enters essentially through the cylindrical mode functions (15), the phase-space factor (22), and the superradiance condition ω<mΩ, yet no estimate is given for omitted O((RT)^−1) or boundary corrections. The deep-infrared region of Fig. 2 (ω≲10 MeV, where the photon wavelength exceeds the plasma radius) is precisely where such corrections should be largest. As a result, the quantitative soft-photon rates and the instability growth rates are not controlled at the quoted parameters, even though the sign of the superradiance effect is likely robust.
  2. [§VI, Eqs. (34)–(36)] The step from the linear balance (27) to exponential growth dN/dt=γN is assumed, not derived. In Eq. (35), γ is defined as the summand of (27), which is a differential rate per phase-space volume, while Eq. (36) treats it as the per-photon rate for a mode with fixed (k_z,k_perp,m). The spontaneous emission term in (27) does not by itself produce growth proportional to N; a kinetic or master-equation treatment including stimulated emission and the occupation of the mode is needed, and the backreaction of the amplified field on the plasma is neglected. Without this, Fig. 2 and the claim of a magnetic-field instability do not follow directly from the derived formula. If the intended identification follows the Endlich-Penco approach [18], its validity conditions should be spelled out explicitly.
  3. [§IV, Eqs. (24)–(27), App. A] The claimed reduction of (27) to the non-rotating formula (A3) in the limit Ω→0, R→∞ needs to be shown explicitly. Equation (27) contains f^2_{k_perp,m}(q_perp), and since f→δ(q_perp−k_perp)/k_perp, the square is a distribution that requires a volume regularization; the text only asserts the limit. In addition, Eq. (24) sums over the two polarizations λ, while Eq. (26) uses a single-polarization |I|^2; it should be checked whether a factor of two is absorbed in the phase-space element or in the 1/(πR^2) normalization. A short derivation of the plane-wave limit would fix the overall normalization of Fig. 1 and make the comparison with (A4) quantitative rather than qualitative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1) and Sec. III] The symbol R is used both for the rotation matrix R_{kl}(t) and for the cylinder radius R in Eqs. (15)–(27); this notational conflict should be removed for clarity.
  2. [Eq. (31)] The expression for |M_σ|^2 appears to contain the ratio k^2/k^2, which cancels; if the two k's are different quantities, they should be labeled distinctly.
  3. [Eq. (32) and following paragraph] The m=0 logarithmic divergence and the ad hoc cutoff k_perp>1/R deserve a more detailed explanation, in particular why the finite cylinder radius does not itself provide a natural infrared regulator for the angular average.
  4. [Sec. V, Fig. 1] The statement that the spectrum and elliptic flow do not depend significantly on R is supported only for R=2 and 3 fm at fixed Ω; a brief comment on the expected sensitivity at larger Ω would be useful.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'Notice that plots have difference ranges' contains a typo and should read 'different ranges'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (27) is derived from standard finite-temperature S-matrix/QFT manipulations; superradiance follows from the analytic sign of Im Π_T, and the one-loop spectral function is imported from independent work.

full rationale

The central result (27) is obtained by combining the standard S-matrix expressions for absorption and emission (Eqs. (2)–(13)) with a cylindrical-wave decomposition (Sec. III) and the isotropy decomposition of the retarded polarization tensor (25). None of these steps is defined in terms of the claimed output: the superradiance condition ω<mΩ is not put in by hand but follows from the stated property Im Π_T(q0,|q|)<0 for q0>0 and >0 for q0<0, together with the energy shift q0=ω−mΩ in Eq. (27). The one-loop spectral function (30) is taken from the independent reference [34], and the hydrodynamic parameters R and Ω are external inputs from simulations [35–39]. The only self-cited technical ingredients are the cylindrical phase-space measure (22) and the choice of cylindrical wave basis from [7,8]; these are standard calculable formulas, not results equivalent to the photon spectrum, so the citation does not make the derivation circular. The Fourier representation (4) assumes local translational invariance via RT≫1; for the quoted QGP parameters RT≈3–4.5, this is a validity and quantitative-control concern rather than a circularity, because Eq. (4) is an approximation with stated conditions, not a redefinition of the final spectrum. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives. Hence the paper is self-contained against external inputs for its main derivation, and there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The master formula (27) contains no fitted constants; it is derived from standard thermal QFT identities and an external one-loop self-energy. The phenomenological plots introduce T, Ω, R, and an infrared cutoff as external or regularizing inputs. The instability claim adds a photon-number evolution assumption but no new entities.

free parameters (4)
  • Infrared cutoff on k_perp for angular averaging = k_perp > 1/R, R = 2 or 3 fm
    Introduced in Sec. V after Eq. (33) to regulate the logarithmic divergence of the m=0 contribution to the angularly averaged spectrum W(ω). The final spectrum depends on this scale, and the sensitivity is not quantified.
  • Temperature T = 0.3 GeV
    Chosen for Figs. 1 and 2 as a representative QGP temperature; an external input, not fitted to the predicted photon rates.
  • Angular velocity Ω = 0.05 fm^-1 and 0.25 fm^-1
    Inferred from hydrodynamic simulations [35-39]; the larger value is used as a sensitivity check. External input, not fitted to the photon spectrum.
  • Plasma radius R = 2 fm and 3 fm
    Taken from hydrodynamic estimates; the text notes the photon spectrum shows little dependence on R. External input.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Thermal Wightman functions satisfy iΠ_+ = -2(1+n_B) Im Π_R and iΠ_- = 2n_B Im Π_R.
    Standard finite-temperature field-theory identities, used in Eqs. (7) and (11), connecting the emission and absorption probabilities to the retarded polarization tensor. Without these identities the master formula cannot be expressed through Im Π_T.
  • domain assumption The rotating plasma current correlator is locally translationally invariant, iΠ_+(x',x)=∫(d^4q/(2π)^4)e^{iq·(x-x')}iΠ_+(q), when RT≫1.
    Invoked in Sec. II to justify Eq. (4). The rotating boundary breaks exact translational invariance, and this approximation is only marginally satisfied for the QGP parameters (RT≈3-4.5), making it the load-bearing fragility of the derivation.
  • domain assumption The plasma is a rigidly rotating cylinder of radius R with constant angular velocity Ω, with the light cylinder outside the plasma (ΩR<1).
    Used throughout Secs. III-V to select cylindrical wave functions and the boundary function f in Eq. (21). The boundary is essential because the periphery cannot exceed light speed.
  • domain assumption The one-loop imaginary part of the transverse photon self-energy, Eq. (30), is correct in the chiral limit and is taken as an input from Scherer and Schutz [34].
    All numerical results in Figs. 1 and 2 are evaluated using this cited spectral function, not derived in the present paper. It is an independent prior calculation, but it is an unproved input here.
  • ad hoc to paper For the magnetic-field instability, the photon number in a mode evolves as dN/dt=γN with γ equal to the summand of Eq. (27), and the magnetic field's backreaction on the plasma can be neglected.
    Sec. VI, Eq. (36). This models a strong classical magnetic field as a photon gas and ignores the effect of the field being amplified on the polarization tensor. This is the main physics assumption behind the claimed instability, and it is not justified beyond the linear estimate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photon emission from rotating plasmas: a generalized McLerran-Toimela formula and the onset of superradiance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KMR6T4FD

@misc{pith2026260812098,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photon emission from rotating plasmas: a generalized McLerran-Toimela formula and the onset of superradiance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KMR6T4FD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12098}
}
abstract

The photon emission and absorption spectra of a plasma rotating with constant angular velocity $\Omega$ are derived in terms of the spectral function of the current--current correlator. In contrast to the non-rotating case, the leading contribution arises already at one-loop order. The photon emission spectrum and its elliptic flow are calculated for a rotating quark--gluon plasma and compared with the leading two-loop result for a non-rotating plasma. The rotating plasma is found to emit significantly more soft photons than the non-rotating one. An analysis of the emission and absorption of cylindrical waves indicates that photons with energy $\omega$ and azimuthal quantum number $m$ satisfying $\omega<m\Omega$ are emitted at a higher rate than they are absorbed, thereby exhibiting the phenomenon of superradiance. It is further argued that these superradiant modes induce an instability of the magnetic field that is generated concurrently with the plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12098 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. exhibits the spectrum of photons emitted by a rotating plasma, assuming the rotating region has a cylindrical shape. The spectrum and elliptic flow do not show significant dependence on the radial plasma size R, which was taken to be 2 and 3 fm. The rotation velocity Ω = 0.05 fm−1 is inferred from hydrodynamic simulations [35–39]. A larger value of Ω = 0.25 fm−1 was studied to determine the sensitivity of the spectr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The growth (left panel, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Endlich and R

    S. Endlich and R. Penco, A Modern Approach to Superradiance, JHEP05, 052, arXiv:1609.06723 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Adamczyket al.(STAR), Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature548, 62 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature548, 62 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [2]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C98, 014910 (2018), arXiv:1805.04400 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [3]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Evidence of Spin-Orbital Angular Momentum Interactions in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Evidence of Spin-Orbital Angular Momentum Interactions in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 012301 (2020), arXiv:1910.14408 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [4]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, T. Niida, S. Pu, A.-H. Tang, and Q. Wang, Spin polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430006 (2024), arXiv:2402.04540 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [5]

    Niida and S

    T. Niida and S. A. Voloshin, Polarization phenomenon in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430010 (2024), arXiv:2404.11042 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    Electromagnetic radiation at extreme angular velocity

    M. Buzzegoli and K. Tuchin, Electromagnetic radiation at extreme angular velocity, JHEP12, 113, arXiv:2308.10349 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [7]

    Synchrotron radiation by slowly rotating fermions

    M. Buzzegoli, J. D. Kroth, K. Tuchin, and N. Vijayakumar, Synchrotron radiation by slowly rotating fermions, Phys. Rev. D107, L051901 (2023), arXiv:2209.02597 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Buzzegoli, J

    M. Buzzegoli, J. D. Kroth, K. Tuchin, and N. Vijayakumar, Photon radiation by relatively slowly rotating fermions in magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D108, 096014 (2023), arXiv:2306.03863 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Buzzegoli, K

    M. Buzzegoli, K. Tuchin, and N. Vijayakumar, Quasiclassical approximation of electromagnetic radiation by fermions embedded in a rigidly rotating medium in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. C111, 054907 (2025), arXiv:2503.06649 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Buzzegoli, S

    M. Buzzegoli, S. Busuioc, J. D. Kroth, N. Vijayakumar, and K. Tuchin, Rotating synchrotron radiation: Photon emission from magnetized and rotating quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D113, 116014 (2026), arXiv:2602.13044 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  4. [11]

    H. A. Weldon, Simple Rules for Discontinuities in Finite Temperature Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D28, 2007 (1983)

    1983

  5. [12]

    L. D. McLerran and T. Toimela, Photon and Dilepton Emission from the Quark - Gluon Plasma: Some General Consid- erations, Phys. Rev. D31, 545 (1985)

    1985

  6. [13]

    Gale and J

    C. Gale and J. I. Kapusta, Vector dominance model at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B357, 65 (1991)

    1991

  7. [14]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, Generation of Waves by a Rotating Body, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 14, 180 (1971)

    1971

  8. [15]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, Amplification of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Waves Reflected from a Rotating Body, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics35, 1085 (1972)

    1972

  9. [16]

    C. W. Misner, Interpretation of gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 994 (1972)

    1972

  10. [17]

    J. D. Bekenstein and M. Schiffer, The Many faces of superradiance, Phys. Rev. D58, 064014 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9803033

    1998 arXiv

  11. [19]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A803, 227 (2008), arXiv:0711.0950 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov, and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24, 5925 (2009), arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Voronyuk, V

    V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, and S. A. Voloshin, (Electro-)Magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C83, 054911 (2011), arXiv:1103.4239 [nucl-th]

    2011 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bzdak and V

    A. Bzdak and V. Skokov, Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 710, 171 (2012), arXiv:1111.1949 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bloczynski, X.-G

    J. Bloczynski, X.-G. Huang, X. Zhang, and J. Liao, Azimuthally fluctuating magnetic field and its impacts on observables in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B718, 1529 (2013), arXiv:1209.6594 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012), arXiv:1201.5108 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tuchin, Time and space dependence of the electromagnetic field in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys

    K. Tuchin, Time and space dependence of the electromagnetic field in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C88, 024911 (2013), arXiv:1305.5806 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    B. G. Zakharov, Electromagnetic response of quark–gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B737, 262 (2014), arXiv:1404.5047 [hep-ph]. 10

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Stewart and K

    E. Stewart and K. Tuchin, Continuous evolution of electromagnetic field in heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A1016, 122308 (2021), arXiv:2106.09124 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Math- ematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    Buzzegoli and K

    M. Buzzegoli and K. Tuchin, Causal fermion states in magnetic field in a relativistic rotating frame and electromagnetic radiation by a rapidly rotating charge, Phys. Rev. D110, 076013 (2024), arXiv:2405.19530 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    V. E. Ambrus and E. Winstanley, Rotating fermions inside a cylindrical boundary, Phys. Rev. D93, 104014 (2016), arXiv:1512.05239 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima, and K. Mameda, Boundary effects and gapped dispersion in rotating fermionic matter, Phys. Lett. B764, 94 (2017), arXiv:1608.00336 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    M. N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, moment of inertia and thermodynamics, JHEP01, 136, arXiv:1611.02598 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    M. N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, Effects of rotation and boundaries on chiral symmetry breaking of relativistic fermions, Phys. Rev. D95, 096006 (2017), arXiv:1702.08266 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Sch´ erer and K

    H. Sch´ erer and K. Schutz, Photon self-energy at all temperatures and densities in all of phase space, JHEP11, 139, arXiv:2405.18466 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    L. P. Csernai, V. K. Magas, and D. J. Wang, Flow Vorticity in Peripheral High Energy Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C87, 034906 (2013), arXiv:1302.5310 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Becattini, G

    F. Becattini, G. Inghirami, V. Rolando, A. Beraudo, L. Del Zanna, A. De Pace, M. Nardi, G. Pagliara, and V. Chandra, A study of vorticity formation in high energy nuclear collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 406 (2015), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 78, 354 (2018)], arXiv:1501.04468 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Vorticity in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C93, 064907 (2016), arXiv:1603.06117 [nucl- th]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Jiang, Z.-W

    Y. Jiang, Z.-W. Lin, and J. Liao, Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C94, 044910 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 95, 049904 (2017)], arXiv:1602.06580 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    X.-L. Xia, H. Li, Z.-B. Tang, and Q. Wang, Probing vorticity structure in heavy-ion collisions by local Λ polarization, Phys. Rev. C98, 024905 (2018), arXiv:1803.00867 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    David, Direct real photons in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Rept

    G. David, Direct real photons in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 046301 (2020), arXiv:1907.08893 [nucl-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gale, J.-F

    C. Gale, J.-F. Paquet, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Multimessenger heavy-ion collision physics, Phys. Rev. C105, 014909 (2022), arXiv:2106.11216 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Paquet, C

    J.-F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, M. Luzum, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Production of photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C93, 044906 (2016), arXiv:1509.06738 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Limits on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modification of Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D41, 1231 (1990)

    1990

  36. [44]

    Joyce and M

    M. Joyce and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Primordial magnetic fields, right-handed electrons, and the Abelian anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1193 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9703005

    1997 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Boyarsky, J

    A. Boyarsky, J. Frohlich, and O. Ruchayskiy, Self-consistent evolution of magnetic fields and chiral asymmetry in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 031301 (2012), arXiv:1109.3350 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D. E. Kharzeev, The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.75, 133 (2014), arXiv:1312.3348 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Z. V. Khaidukov, V. P. Kirilin, A. V. Sadofyev, and V. I. Zakharov, On Magnetostatics of Chiral Media, Nucl. Phys. B 934, 521 (2018), arXiv:1307.0138 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    V. P. Kirilin, A. V. Sadofyev, and V. I. Zakharov, Anomaly and long-range forces, in100th anniversary of the birth of I.Ya. Pomeranchuk(2014) pp. 272–286, arXiv:1312.0895 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Akamatsu and N

    Y. Akamatsu and N. Yamamoto, Chiral Plasma Instabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 052002 (2013), arXiv:1302.2125 [nucl- th]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Avdoshkin, V

    A. Avdoshkin, V. P. Kirilin, A. V. Sadofyev, and V. I. Zakharov, On consistency of hydrodynamic approximation for chiral media, Phys. Lett. B755, 1 (2016), arXiv:1402.3587 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Dvornikov and V

    M. Dvornikov and V. B. Semikoz, Magnetic field instability in a neutron star driven by the electroweak electron-nucleon interaction versus the chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. D91, 061301 (2015), arXiv:1410.6676 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Tuchin, Electromagnetic field and the chiral magnetic effect in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys

    K. Tuchin, Electromagnetic field and the chiral magnetic effect in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C91, 064902 (2015), arXiv:1411.1363 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Manuel and J

    C. Manuel and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Dynamical evolution of the chiral magnetic effect: Applications to the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D92, 074018 (2015), arXiv:1501.07608 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    P. V. Buividovich and M. V. Ulybyshev, Numerical study of chiral plasma instability within the classical statistical field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D94, 025009 (2016), arXiv:1509.02076 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sigl and N

    G. Sigl and N. Leite, Chiral Magnetic Effect in Protoneutron Stars and Magnetic Field Spectral Evolution, JCAP01, 025, arXiv:1507.04983 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    X.-l. Xia, H. Qin, and Q. Wang, Approach to Chandrasekhar-Kendall-Woltjer State in a Chiral Plasma, Phys. Rev. D94, 054042 (2016), arXiv:1607.01126 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    D. B. Kaplan, S. Reddy, and S. Sen, Energy Conservation and the Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. D96, 016008 (2017), arXiv:1612.00032 [hep-ph]. 11

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    V. P. Kirilin and A. V. Sadofyev, Anomalous Transport and Generalized Axial Charge, Phys. Rev. D96, 016019 (2017), arXiv:1703.02483 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Tuchin, Radiative instability of quantum electrodynamics in chiral matter, Phys

    K. Tuchin, Radiative instability of quantum electrodynamics in chiral matter, Phys. Lett. B786, 249 (2018), arXiv:1806.07340 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    M. Mace, N. Mueller, S. Schlichting, and S. Sharma, Chiral Instabilities and the Onset of Chiral Turbulence in QED Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 191604 (2020), arXiv:1910.01654 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Das and K

    A. Das and K. Tuchin, Rotational stability of magnetic field in rotating quark-gluon plasma, Nucl. Phys. A1059, 123075 (2025), arXiv:2502.18354 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.