Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Spectral parameters of the $\rho$ resonance from lattice QCD

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a lattice QCD calculation of the ρ meson's mass and width at the physical pion mass and continuum limit, with values that agree with experiment and are confirmed by a second, independent analysis method.

desk verdict Valuable dataset and two-analysis cross-check, but the printed BW fit does not reproduce its own Table 5; send it to referees with a request to fix the fit and the error budget. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03700 v1 pith:KTD52SDZ submitted 2025-02-06 hep-lat hep-ph

Zhengli Wang , Derek B. Leinweber , Chuan Liu , Liuming Liu , Peng Sun , Anthony W. Thomas , Jia-jun Wu , Hanyang Xing
show 1 more author
Kang Yu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-ph
keywords latticeQCDrhomesonresonancewidthBreit-Wignerfinite-volumequantizationHamiltonianeffectivefieldtheorychiralextrapolationcontinuumlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Lattice QCD, the numerical formulation of the strong force, can now determine the properties of an unstable hadron at the physical point with roughly one-percent accuracy. The paper uses nine ensembles with three lattice spacings and pion masses from 135 to 320 MeV, extracts about thirty finite-volume energy levels per ensemble, converts them into $\pi\pi$ scattering phase shifts, and fits those phase shifts to the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape. Simultaneously extrapolating the fitted mass and coupling linearly in $m_\pi^2$ and $a^2$ to the physical pion mass and the continuum gives $m_\rho = 781.6 \pm 10.0$ MeV and $\Gamma_\rho = 146.5 \pm 9.9$ MeV, close to the experimental values. An alternative Hamiltonian effective field theory analysis, which keeps the non-analytic quark-mass dependence of the hadronic loops explicitly, yields $m_\rho = 782.0 \pm 13.5$ MeV and $\Gamma_\rho = 155.0 \pm 12.0$ MeV, so the two routes agree. If this is right, the mass and width of the $\rho$ emerge from the theory itself rather than being imported from experiment.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by four linked pieces. First, a large operator basis — quark-bilinear $\rho$ operators plus $\pi\pi$ operators in the rest frame and several moving frames — is processed with distillation smearing and a generalized eigenvalue problem to deliver around thirty finite-volume energy levels per ensemble. Second, the standard finite-volume quantization condition converts each level into the p-wave $\pi\pi$ phase shift at that energy. Third, the phase shifts are fitted with the relativistic Breit-Wigner amplitude whose energy-dependent width is $\Gamma(s) = \frac{g_{\rho\pi\pi}^2}{6\pi s}\left(\frac{s}{4}-m_\pi^2\right)^{3/2}$, yielding $m_\rho$ and $g_{\rho\pi\pi}$ for each ensemble. Fourth, the physical-point extrapolation uses $m_\rho = c_0 + c_1 m_\pi^2 + c_2 a^2$ and a matching linear form for $g_{\rho\pi\pi}$, a dependence the paper justifies by citing the chiral effective theory result that $O(m_\pi^3)$ and non-analytic $m_\pi^4$ terms are negligible in this window. The cross-checking HEFT model instead couples a bare $\rho$ to $\pi\pi$ and $\omega\pi$ channels; its self-energy carries the non-analytic quark-mass dependence, and the bare mass is extrapolated with the same linear form.

What would settle it

Compute one additional ensemble on the same action at, say, $m_\pi \approx 400$ MeV with the same analysis pipeline and test whether its extracted Breit-Wigner mass and width fall on the linear fit used here. A deviation of more than about two standard deviations from the fitted line would show the linear extrapolation is invalid and the physical-point values are unreliable; alternatively, a re-fit excluding the physical-pion-mass ensemble that still extrapolates to the same $781.6$ MeV would support the result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is that the full finite-volume spectrum of the $\rho$ sector, computed with dynamical up, down, and strange quarks on nine clover-improved ensembles, yields a Breit-Wigner mass and width $(m_\rho,\Gamma_\rho) = (781.6 \pm 10.0, 146.5 \pm 9.9)$ MeV after a linear extrapolation in $m_\pi^2$ and $a^2$ to the physical point, together with the pole position $Z_{\rm pole} = 768.1(10.0) - i\,70.5(4.9)$ MeV. The HEFT reanalysis, which includes the $\pi\pi$ and $\omega\pi$ channels and separates the hadronic-loop contributions from the bare quark-model-like $\rho$ state, gives $(m_\rho,\Gamma_\rho) = (782.0 \pm 13.5, 155.0 \pm 12.0)$ MeV and a consistent pole position $777.0(15.0) - i\,60.0(6.0)$ MeV. Both sets of numbers agree with experiment, and the authors present the result as the most precise lattice determination to date of the spectral parameters of a hadron that decays through the strong interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Breit-Wigner mass and the $\rho\pi\pi$ coupling vary linearly with $m_\pi^2$ and $a^2$ across the 135-320 MeV pion-mass window, so that six independent data points can pin down three coefficients; if higher-order chiral curvature shows up in that window, the quoted $m_\rho = 781.6$ MeV and $\Gamma_\rho = 146.5$ MeV could shift beyond their stated errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the result stands, the $\rho$ mass and width become predictions of QCD itself with roughly 10 MeV precision, establishing the attainable accuracy for a broad, strongly decaying resonance.
  • The agreement between the Breit-Wigner and HEFT extrapolations indicates that the linear forms in $m_\pi^2$ and $a^2$ capture the data well over the 135-320 MeV pion-mass window and that the neglected higher-order chiral terms are too small to show up here.
  • Because one ensemble sits at the physical pion mass, the extrapolation is anchored rather than performed over a long lever arm, which strengthens confidence in the continuum-extrapolated values.
  • The reported pole positions give a precise spectral benchmark for other low-energy QCD quantities that depend on the $\rho$ line shape, such as the pion form factor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same operator set and HEFT machinery could be applied to the $K^*$ resonance, whose coupled $K\pi$ and $K\eta$ channels would test whether the linear extrapolation works equally well for strange vector resonances.
  • With only six data points for three coefficients, the fit cannot by itself rule out curvature; a clean test would be to split the ensembles into high- and low-pion-mass subsets and require both extrapolations to meet at the same physical-point value.
  • If the $\omega\pi$ channel consistently shifts the HEFT pole closer to experiment, coupled-channel effects at the level of a few MeV are already visible in the $\rho$ sector, and adding $K\bar K$ could close the remaining gap between the two methods.
  • The sub-10-MeV error on the mass suggests the $\rho$ could soon serve as a precision benchmark for the quark-mass dependence of non-perturbative QCD, letting chiral extrapolation formulas be tested against a first-principles target rather than against experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a lattice QCD determination of the ρ resonance mass and width using nine N_f = 2+1 Wilson-Clover ensembles at three lattice spacings and pion masses from 135 to 320 MeV. Finite-volume spectra are obtained from a large operator basis with the GEVP method, converted to p-wave ππ phase shifts via Lüscher's formalism, and fitted with a relativistic Breit-Wigner form. The BW parameters are then extrapolated linearly in mπ^2 and a^2, giving (m_ρ, Γ_ρ) = (781.6±10.0, 146.5±9.9) MeV. The analysis is repeated with Hamiltonian effective field theory, including ππ and ωπ channels, giving consistent values (782.0±13.5, 155.0±12.0) MeV. The paper claims this is the most precise lattice determination to date of an unstable hadron's mass and width at the physical point.

Significance. If correct, the result is significant: it would demonstrate that a single consistent set of lattice ensembles, with physical-pion-mass data and multiple lattice spacings, can reproduce the ρ spectral parameters from first principles. The paper's strengths are the comprehensive operator construction, the use of moving frames and multiple volumes, the inclusion of physical-pion-mass ensembles, and the independent HEFT cross-check. However, the central Breit-Wigner extrapolation is not reproducible as written because Eq. (23) is inconsistent with Table 5, and the quoted χ²/dof = 0.23 cannot be correct. The HEFT arm provides independent support for the physics conclusion, so the overall result may survive correction, but the precision claim and the headline BW numbers require substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (23) and Table 5] Equation (23) is internally inconsistent with Table 5. Using the stated units and the ensemble parameters from Table 1, Eq. (13) with (c0, c1, c2) = (766.2 MeV, 0.84 GeV^-1, -7.97 GeV·fm^-2) predicts m_ρ = 749.8, 762.0, 733.8, 822.0, 780.8, and 829.3 MeV for the six rows of Table 5. The corresponding Table 5 values are 749.0(6.0), 723.9(5.6), 714.0(34.5), 795.5(4.2), 754.2(3.0), and 834.8(7.4) MeV. The residuals yield χ²/dof ≈ 55 for 3 degrees of freedom, not 0.23. Therefore Eq. (23), the quoted χ², and Table 5 cannot all be correct, and Eq. (25) is not reproducible as written. The authors must supply the actual fit table and residuals, correct the coefficients, or rerun the fit.
  2. [§3.3, Eqs. (13), (14), (22)] The global extrapolation uses six data points for a three-parameter linear fit, and the text does not quantify the truncation uncertainty from neglecting O(mπ^3) and non-analytic mπ^4 terms, despite citing Ref. [3]. Even after correcting the coefficient inconsistency, the large scatter of the Table 5 points about the claimed linear behavior suggests that the quoted χ²/dof cannot validate the functional form. A systematic error estimate—for example, by excluding one ensemble, adding a curvature term, or varying the fit range—should be provided before the 10 MeV errors in Eq. (25) can be accepted.
  3. [§3.2 and §3.3, Table 5 uncertainty budget] The procedure by which differences among irreps are converted into a systematic uncertainty in Table 5 is not described, and the selection of the BW fit window (the 'band' in Fig. 3, which also defines the HEFT fit region) is not quantitatively specified. Without these details, the error budget entering the final values in Eq. (25) cannot be independently assessed, which is load-bearing for the claimed precision.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix B] The ensemble name 'C49P14' in the Appendix B caption should read 'C48P14'.
  2. [§3.3, near Eq. (17)] The phrase 'as defined in. (17)' should read 'as defined in Eq. (17)'.
  3. [Fig. 3 and §3.2] The vertical band used to select data for the HEFT analysis is not defined; please state the energy window and the number of levels per ensemble entering the HEFT fits.
  4. [Abstract and Fig. 7] The claim of 'most precise determination to date' should be substantiated by a quantitative comparison with the uncertainties of other recent works, especially Ref. [40] at physical quark masses.
  5. [§3.3, Eq. (24)] The errors on c̃1 and c̃2 in Eq. (24) are very large; reporting the fit correlation matrix or a figure analogous to Fig. 5 for g_ρππ would help the reader assess the stability of this fit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: physical-point rho parameters are fits to the paper's own lattice spectra using external chiral/HEFT parameterizations; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Breit-Wigner arm converts the paper's lattice energy levels into phase shifts via Luescher's formula (Eqs. 8-9), fits m_rho and g_rho-pi-pi on each ensemble to Eq. (11), and extrapolates those fitted parameters to the physical pion mass and continuum using Eqs. (13)-(14); the chiral form of Eq. (13) is attributed to the external calculation of Ref. [3], and the six input points are the paper's own Table 5 values. The HEFT arm is not a re-statement of the BW result: it directly fits the finite-volume Hamiltonian to the same lattice spectra, and only the omega-pi coupling/regulator pair is fixed from the physical omega -> 3pi width, while the rho mass and width are outputs of Eq. (20). Prior HEFT work by the authors (Refs. [41,52,64-66]) is cited for the workflow and for the practice of holding couplings/regulators independent of m_pi, but those parameters are re-fit to the present lattice spectra, so the self-citations are not load-bearing inputs to the physical-point values. No step uses the target (m_rho, Gamma_rho) as a constraint on itself. The paper's own caveat that a four-parameter fit for the strange-quark dependence is not resolvable with six data points, and any numerical inconsistency between Eq. (23) and Table 5, concern fit stability and reproducibility rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central numerical results are obtained from two layers of fitting: per-ensemble BW or HEFT fits to lattice energy levels, and global linear extrapolations in m_pi^2 and a^2. The dominant free parameters are the six extrapolation coefficients (three for m_rho, three for g_rho_pi_pi) and the HEFT coupling/regulator parameters. The key axioms are the Luscher p-wave truncation, the linear extrapolation ansatz, and the HEFT potential form. The only model entity introduced is the bare rho state in HEFT, which has no independent experimental handle.

free parameters (9)
  • c0, c1, c2 for m_rho (BW extrapolation) = 766.2(8.5) MeV, 0.84(9) GeV^-1, -7.97(81) GeV fm^-2
    Linear fit coefficients in Eq. (13) mapping six ensemble BW masses to the physical pion mass and continuum.
  • c_tilde0, c_tilde1, c_tilde2 for g_rho_pi_pi = 5.74(67), -5.3(6.4), 46(48)
    Fit coefficients in Eq. (14) for the BW coupling, from which the physical-point width is computed.
  • Per-ensemble BW fit parameters (m_rho, g_rho_pi_pi) = Table 5, six m_rho values from 714.0 to 834.8 MeV and g from 4.916 to 6.300
    Each phase-shift curve is fit to BW form; these are intermediate fitted quantities feeding the extrapolations.
  • HEFT scheme A: g_rho_pi_pi, Lambda_rho_pi_pi = 7.0(1), 0.9(1) GeV
    Coupling and regulator of the rho-pi-pi potential fitted to the lattice spectra in scheme A.
  • HEFT scheme B: g_rho_pi_pi, Lambda_rho_pi_pi = 7.4(1), 1.0(1) GeV
    Same quantities refitted in scheme B with the omega-pi channel included.
  • HEFT scheme B: g_rho_omega_pi, Lambda_rho_omega_pi = 18 GeV^-1, 1 GeV
    Fixed model inputs constrained by the physical omega -> 3pi decay width, not fitted to the rho data in this paper.
  • HEFT bare-mass extrapolation coefficients, scheme A = c0=817.0(13.0) MeV, c1=0.85(12) GeV^-1, c2=-7.61(89) GeV fm^-2
    Eq. (27) fit of m_B^rho over m_pi and a^2.
  • HEFT bare-mass extrapolation coefficients, scheme B = c0=840.0(11.2) MeV, c1=0.72(11) GeV^-1, c2=-7.91(86) GeV fm^-2
    Eq. (28) fit of m_B^rho with the omega-pi channel included.
  • GEVP time parameters (t0, tilde t) = (5, 6)
    Chosen by hand as stable over (4,10); enters all energy extractions.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Luscher quantization with l>=3 partial waves neglected
    Eq. (8) with the assertion in Sec. 2.4: 'we will only consider the p-wave and ignore the higher partial wave contributions'.
  • domain assumption Strange quark mass effects neglected
    Sec. 2.1: 'mK for all ensembles are similar and close to the physical value, therefore we neglect the influence of the strange quark mass'.
  • domain assumption Breit-Wigner line shape describes lattice phase shifts
    Eq. (11) used to fit phase shifts near the rho; the authors note this is an assumption.
  • domain assumption Linear m_pi^2 and a^2 dependence of m_rho and g_rho_pi_pi
    Eqs. (13)-(14), 'Neglecting O(m_pi^3) and the non-analytic term of order m_pi^4'; shapes the extrapolated central values.
  • domain assumption HEFT potential form and regulator independence
    Eqs. (15)-(16) with couplings and regulators held fixed independent of m_pi and a, borrowed from prior HEFT works.
  • domain assumption One-state exponential fit to GEVP principal correlators
    Sec. 2.3: higher energy states found to make minimal contributions; single exponential Eq. (7) used.
  • domain assumption Scale setting from CLQCD tadpole-improved clover ensembles (Ref. [54])
    Lattice spacings a=0.105, 0.077, 0.052 fm taken from a prior CLQCD determination; uncertainty not propagated into final errors.
invented entities (1)
  • Bare rho state |rho_B> in HEFT Hamiltonian
    purpose: Provides the quark-model-like seed state that couples to pi-pi and omega-pi channels in the HEFT analysis.
    This is an effective-model degree of freedom whose mass m_B^rho is fitted per ensemble and then extrapolated; it is not an observed particle and has no handle outside the model, though it is inherited from established HEFT practice rather than newly invented here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral parameters of the $\rho$ resonance from lattice QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KTD52SDZ

@misc{pith2026250203700,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral parameters of the $\rho$ resonance from lattice QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KTD52SDZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03700}
}
abstract

We present a lattice QCD investigation of the $\rho$ resonance using nine $N_f = 2 + 1$ Wilson-Clover ensembles with three lattice spacings and various pion masses ranging from $135$ to $320$ MeV. For each ensemble, a large number of finite volume energy levels are determined and the energy dependence of the phase shift obtained from L\"uscher's finite volume method. The mass and width of the $\rho$ resonance are then extracted by assuming the Breit-Wigner form. The mass and width are extrapolated to the physical pion mass and continuum limit ($\mathcal{O}(a^2)$) using a linear function of $a^2$ and $m^2_\pi$. The extrapolated values for the mass and width in the Breit-Wigner form are $(m_\rho,\,\Gamma_\rho) = (781.6\pm10.0,\, 146.5\pm 9.9)$ MeV, which are in good agreement with experiment. An alternative method of analysis, based on Hamiltonian effective field theory, involves directly fitting the lattice energy levels and accounting for the quark mass dependence of the hadronic loop diagrams which yield the leading and next-to-leading non-analytic behaviour. This approach also yields consistent $\rho$ parameters at the physical point. This represents the most precise determination to date of the mass and width of a hadron which is unstable under strong decay, achieved through comprehensive lattice QCD calculations and methods of analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03700 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effective masses of the eigenvalues λn(t) from the GEVP analysis for all P⃗ and Λ on lattice F48P30. The horizontal lines indicate the fitted energies, atEn. 30 40 50 L/a 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 a E P000,T1u 30 40 50 L/a P001,A1 30 40 50 L/a P001,E2 30 40 50 L/a P011,A1 30 40 50 L/a P011,B1 30 40 50 L/a P011,B2 30 40 50 L/a P111,A1 30 40 50 L/a P002,A1 F32P30&F48P30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Energy spectra for all P⃗ and Λ on lattices F32P30 and F48P30. The blue and black points show the extracted spectra. The green solid lines indicate the non-interacting ππ energies. The inelastic thresholds corresponding to the opening of the KK¯ and πω channels are indicated by the cyan dashed lines and purple dotted lines, respectively. The red dash-dotted line represents the mass calculated from the single particl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. P-wave ππ elastic scattering phase shift δ1 as a function of the center-of-mass energy (Ecm). The curves represent the fit to the BW form. The vertical band highights the data used to constrain the HEFT analysis. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The real part of the complex pole mass determined by HEFT in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The result of extrapolation of mρ using Eq. (13). The blue open circles denote mρ in the BW form with elimination of lattice spacing artefacts parameterized by c2a 2 . The solid lines with gray error band denote the linear function c0 + c1m 2 π . The red point is the r…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between different LQCD-based calculations of the ρ mass and width. Among them only four made an extrapolation in mπ, which are marked red. In addition, only two made a lattice spacing extrapolation. In the present work, we offer two results based on the BW a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The fit to lattice spectra using HEFT. The data points denote the lattice spectra in the present work. The red points are the energy levels lying in the band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as for Fig.8 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: As for Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: As for Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: As for Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: As for Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: As for Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergence of the $\pi(1300)$ Resonance from Lattice QCD

    hep-lat 2025-10 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Lattice QCD plus three-body scattering formalism yields a π(1300)-like pole at (1169±46)−i(62−62+168) MeV, consistent with experiment.

  2. Higher order quantization conditions for two-body scattering with spin

    hep-lat 2026-02 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Higher-order finite-volume quantization conditions for spin-1/2 + spin-0 scattering are derived to J=11/2 and numerically checked to agree with independent box spectra to six significant figures.

  3. Electromagnetic structure of charged and neutral strange vector mesons

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Covariant NJL calculations give K*+ charge radius 0.45 fm² and magnetic moment 2.67 μ_N, and K*0 radius −0.04 fm² and moment 0.032 μ_N.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [3]

    P. C. Bruns, U.-G. Meissner, Infrared regularization for spin-1 fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 40 (2005) 97–119.arXiv:hep-ph/0411223, doi:10.1140/ epjc/s2005-02118-0

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  2. [1]

    J. A. Oller, E. Oset, J. R. Pelaez, Meson meson interaction in a non- perturbative chiral approach, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074001, [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 099906 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 11 35 40 45 50 55 60 L/a 131,0,T1 35 40 45 50 55 60 L/a 131,1,E 35 40 45 50 55 60 L/a 131,2,B2 35 40 45 50 55 60 L/a 131,3,A1 35 40 45 50 55 60 L/a 131,1,A1 35 ...

    arXiv 1999

  3. [2]

    Hadronic decay of a vector meson from the lattice

    C. McNeile, C. Michael, Hadronic decay of a vector meson from the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 556 (2003) 177–184. arXiv:hep-lat/0212020, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00130-8

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    C. R. Allton, W. Armour, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, Chiral and continuum extrapolation of partially-quenched lattice results, Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 125–130. arXiv:hep-lat/0504022, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.020

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Unified chiral analysis of the vector meson spectrum from lattice QCD

    W. Armour, C. R. Allton, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, Unified chiral analysis of the vector meson spectrum from lattice QCD, J. Phys. G 32 (2006) 971–992. arXiv:hep-lat/0510078, doi:10. 1088/0954-3899/32/7/007

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    Hadronic decays from the lattice

    C. Michael, Hadronic decays from the lattice, Eur. Phys. J. A 31 (2007) 793–798. arXiv:hep-lat/0609008, doi:10.1140/epja/ i2006-10177-6

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Lattice QCD Calculation of the $\rho$ Meson Decay Width

    S. Aoki, et al., Lattice QCD Calculation of the rho Meson Decay Width, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 094506. arXiv:0708.3705, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.76.094506

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Extracting the rho resonance from lattice QCD simulations at small quark masses

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, Y . Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, J. Zanotti, Extracting the rho resonance from lattice QCD simulations at small quark masses, PoS LATTICE2008 (2008) 136. arXiv:0810.5337, doi:10.22323/1.066.0136

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Hanhart, J

    C. Hanhart, J. R. Pelaez, G. Rios, Quark mass dependence of the rho and sigma from dispersion relations and Chiral Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 152001. arXiv:0801.2871, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.152001

    2008 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Nebreda, J

    J. Nebreda, J. R. Pelaez., Strange and non-strange quark mass dependence of elastic light resonances from SU(3) Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory to one loop, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 054035.arXiv:1001.5237, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.054035

    2010 arXiv

  3. [11]

    J. R. Pelaez, G. Rios, Chiral extrapolation of light resonances from one and two-loop unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory versus lattice results, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 114002. arXiv:1010.6008, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.82.114002

    2010 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Aoki, et al., Calculation of ρ meson decay width from the PACS- CS configurations, PoS LATTICE2010 (2010) 108

    S. Aoki, et al., Calculation of ρ meson decay width from the PACS- CS configurations, PoS LATTICE2010 (2010) 108. arXiv:1011.1063, doi:10.22323/1.105.0108

    2010 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Frison, et al., Rho decay width from the lattice, PoS LATTICE2010 (2010) 139

    J. Frison, et al., Rho decay width from the lattice, PoS LATTICE2010 (2010) 139. arXiv:1011.3413, doi:10.22323/1.105.0139

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Baron, et al., Light hadrons from lattice QCD with light (u,d), strange and charm dynamical quarks, JHEP 06 (2010) 111

    R. Baron, et al., Light hadrons from lattice QCD with light (u,d), strange and charm dynamical quarks, JHEP 06 (2010) 111. arXiv:1004.5284, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)111

    2010 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Baron, et al., Computing K and D meson masses with N f = 2+1+1 twisted mass lattice QCD, Comput

    R. Baron, et al., Computing K and D meson masses with N f = 2+1+1 twisted mass lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 299–316. arXiv:1005.2042, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.10.004

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    X. Feng, K. Jansen, D. B. Renner, Resonance Parameters of the rho- Meson from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 094505. arXiv: 1011.5288, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.094505

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    C. B. Lang, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, M. Vidmar, Coupled channel anal- ysis of the rho meson decay in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 84 (5) (2011) 054503, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 059903 (2014)]. arXiv:1105.5636, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.059903

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Aoki, et al., ρ Meson Decay in 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD, Phys

    S. Aoki, et al., ρ Meson Decay in 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 094505. arXiv:1106.5365, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84. 094505

    2011 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Z.-H. Guo, J. A. Oller, Resonances from meson-meson scattering in U(3) CHPT, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 034005. arXiv:1104.2849, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.84.034005

    2011 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Z.-H. Guo, J. A. Oller, J. Ruiz de Elvira, Chiral dynamics in form factors, spectral-function sum rules, meson-meson scattering and semi- local duality, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054006. arXiv:1206.4163, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.054006

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    H.-X. Chen, E. Oset, ππ interaction in the ρ channel in finite volume, Phys. Rev. D 87 (1) (2013) 016014.arXiv:1202.2787, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.87.016014

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Pelissier, A

    C. Pelissier, A. Alexandru, Resonance parameters of the rho-meson from asymmetrical lattices, Phys. Rev. D 87 (1) (2013) 014503.arXiv:1211. 0092, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.014503

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. E. Thomas, Energy dependence of the ρ resonance in ππ elastic scattering from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87 (3) (2013) 034505, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 099902 (2014)]. arXiv:1212.0830, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.034505

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    P. C. Bruns, L. Greil, A. Sch ¨afer, Chiral behavior of vector meson self energies, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 114503. arXiv:1309.3976, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.114503

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Albaladejo, G

    M. Albaladejo, G. Rios, J. A. Oller, L. Roca, Finite volume treatment of ππ scattering in theρ channel (7 2013). arXiv:1307.5169

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Metivet, Lattice study of ππ scattering using N f = 2 + 1 Wilson improved quarks with masses down to their physical values, PoS LAT- TICE2014 (2015) 079

    T. Metivet, Lattice study of ππ scattering using N f = 2 + 1 Wilson improved quarks with masses down to their physical values, PoS LAT- TICE2014 (2015) 079. arXiv:1410.8447, doi:10.22323/1.214. 0079

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    G. S. Bali, S. Collins, A. Cox, G. Donald, M. G ¨ockeler, C. B. Lang, A. Sch ¨afer, ρ and K∗ resonances on the lattice at nearly physical quark masses and N f = 2, Phys. Rev. D 93 (5) (2016) 054509. arXiv:1512. 08678, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.054509

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    D. R. Bolton, R. A. Briceno, D. J. Wilson, Connecting physical resonant amplitudes and lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 757 (2016) 50–56. arXiv: 1507.07928, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.043

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    D. J. Wilson, R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. E. Thomas, Coupled ππ, K ¯K scattering in P-wave and the ρ resonance from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 92 (9) (2015) 094502. arXiv:1507.02599, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094502

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    W. Sun, A. Alexandru, Y . Chen, T. Draper, Z. Liu, Y .-B. Yang, Anatomy of the ρ resonance from lattice QCD at the physical point, Chin. Phys. C 42 (6) (2018) 063102. arXiv:1507.02541, doi:10.1088/ 1674-1137/42/6/063102

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. Guo, A. Alexandru, Resonance Parameters for the rho-meson from Lattice QCD, PoS LATTICE2015 (2016) 073. arXiv:1511.06334, doi:10.22323/1.251.0073

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Z. Fu, L. Wang, Studying the ρ resonance parameters with staggered fermions, Phys. Rev. D 94 (3) (2016) 034505. arXiv:1608.07478, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034505

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    D. Guo, A. Alexandru, R. Molina, M. D ¨oring, Rho resonance parameters from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94 (3) (2016) 034501. arXiv:1605. 16 03993, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034501

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Bulava, B

    J. Bulava, B. Fahy, B. H ¨orz, K. J. Juge, C. Morningstar, C. H. Wong, I = 1 and I = 2 π−π scattering phase shifts from Nf = 2 + 1 lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 910 (2016) 842–867. arXiv:1604.05593, doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.07.024

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    B. Hu, R. Molina, M. D ¨oring, A. Alexandru, Two-flavor Simulations of the ρ(770) and the Role of the K ¯K Channel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (12) (2016) 122001. arXiv:1605.04823, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 117.122001

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Alexandrou, L

    C. Alexandrou, L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, J. Negele, S. Paul, M. Petschlies, A. Pochinsky, G. Rendon, S. Syritsyn, P-wave ππ scattering and the ρ resonance from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) (2017) 034525.arXiv: 1704.05439, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034525

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Andersen, J

    C. Andersen, J. Bulava, B. H ¨orz, C. Morningstar, The I = 1 pion-pion scattering amplitude and timelike pion form factor fromNf = 2+ 1 lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 939 (2019) 145–173. arXiv:1808.05007, doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.12.018

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Giusti, F

    D. Giusti, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, Light-quark contribution to the leading hadronic vacuum polarization term of the muon g− 2 from twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 98 (11) (2018) 114504. arXiv:1808.00887, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.114504

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Werner, et al., Hadron-Hadron Interactions from N f = 2+1+1 Lattice QCD: Theρ-resonance, Eur

    M. Werner, et al., Hadron-Hadron Interactions from N f = 2+1+1 Lattice QCD: Theρ-resonance, Eur. Phys. J. A 56 (2) (2020) 61. arXiv:1907. 01237, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00057-4

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Boyle, F

    P. Boyle, F. Erben, V . G ¨ulpers, M. T. Hansen, F. Joswig, N. P. Lachini, M. Marshall, A. Portelli, Light and strange vector resonances from lattice QCD at physical quark masses (6 2024). arXiv:2406.19194

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J.-J. Wu, T. S. H. Lee, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, Finite-volume Hamiltonian method for coupled-channels interactions in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. C 90 (5) (2014) 055206.arXiv:1402.4868, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.90.055206

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    H. Yan, M. Mai, M. Garofalo, U.-G. Meißner, C. Liu, L. Liu, C. Urbach, ω Meson from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (21) (2024) 211906. arXiv:2407.16659, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.211906

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    J.-J. Wu, H. Kamano, T. S. H. Lee, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, Nucleon resonance structure in the finite volume of lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 95 (11) (2017) 114507. arXiv:1611.05970, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.95.114507

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Peardon, J

    M. Peardon, J. Bulava, J. Foley, C. Morningstar, J. Dudek, R. G. Ed- wards, B. Joo, H.-W. Lin, D. G. Richards, K. J. Juge, A Novel quark- field creation operator construction for hadronic physics in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 054506. arXiv:0905.2160, doi:10.1103/ Phys...

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Luscher, V olume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, V olume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 177. doi:10.1007/BF01211589

    1986 doi

  38. [46]

    Luscher, V olume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, V olume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States, Commun. Math. Phys. 105 (1986) 153–188. doi:10.1007/BF01211097

    1986 doi

  39. [47]

    Luscher, Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nucl. Phys. B 354 (1991) 531–578. doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(91)90366-6

    1991

  40. [48]

    Rummukainen, S

    K. Rummukainen, S. A. Gottlieb, Resonance scattering phase shifts on a nonrest frame lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 450 (1995) 397–436. arXiv: hep-lat/9503028, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00313-H

    1995 arXiv

  41. [49]

    C. h. Kim, C. T. Sachrajda, S. R. Sharpe, Finite-volume e ffects for two-hadron states in moving frames, Nucl. Phys. B 727 (2005) 218–

    2005

  42. [50]

    Gockeler, R

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, M. Lage, U. G. Meissner, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Rusetsky, G. Schierholz, J. M. Zanotti, Scattering phases for meson and baryon resonances on general moving-frame lattices, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094513. arXiv:1206.4141, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86. 094513

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Li, J.-J

    Y . Li, J.-J. Wu, T. S. H. Lee, R. D. Young, Generalized boost transforma- tions in finite volumes and application to Hamiltonian methods, JHEP 08 (2024) 178. arXiv:2404.16702, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)178

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    K. Yu, Y . Li, J.-J. Wu, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, Study of the pion-mass dependence of ρ-meson properties in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) (2024) 034505. arXiv:2311.03903, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.034505

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Hu, et al., Quark masses and low-energy constants in the continuum from the tadpole-improved clover ensembles, Phys

    Z.-C. Hu, et al., Quark masses and low-energy constants in the continuum from the tadpole-improved clover ensembles, Phys. Rev. D 109 (5) (2024) 054507. arXiv:2310.00814, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.054507

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, C. E. Thomas, Toward the excited meson spectrum of dynamical QCD, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 034508. arXiv:1004.4930, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82. 034508

    2010 arXiv

  48. [56]

    C. E. Thomas, R. G. Edwards, J. J. Dudek, Helicity operators for mesons in flight on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 014507. arXiv:1107. 1930, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014507

    2012 doi

  49. [57]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. E. Thomas, S and D-wave phase shifts in isospin-2 pi pi scattering from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 034031. arXiv:1203.6041, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.034031

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    J. M. Bulava, et al., Excited State Nucleon Spectrum with Two Flavors of Dynamical Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 034505. arXiv:0901. 0027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.034505

    2009 doi

  51. [59]

    M. S. Mahbub, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, P. J. Moran, A. G. Williams, Structure and Flow of the Nucleon Eigenstates in Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87 (9) (2013) 094506. arXiv:1302.2987, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.87.094506

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A. L. Kiratidis, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, B. J. Owen, Lattice baryon spectroscopy with multi-particle interpolators, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 094509. arXiv:1501.07667, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094509

    2015 arXiv

  53. [61]

    A. L. Kiratidis, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, Z.-W. Liu, F. M. Stokes, A. W. Thomas, Search for low-lying lattice QCD eigenstates in the Roper regime, Phys. Rev. D 95 (7) (2017) 074507. arXiv:1608.03051, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.074507

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    L. S. Brown, R. L. Goble, Pion-Pion Scattering, Current Algebra, Unitar- ity, and the Width of the Rho Meson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 (1968) 346–349. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.346

    1968 doi

  55. [63]

    F. M. Renard, Vector Mesons and e + e- Annihilation. 1. rho, omega, phi Dominance with Inelastic and Finite Width E ffects. 2. Higher Vec- tor Mesons in a Nonet Structure. 3. Vector Meson Continuum and e + e- Annihilation at High-Energy, Nucl. Phys. B 82 (1974) 1–25. doi: 10.1...

    1974 doi

  56. [64]

    J. M. M. Hall, A. C. P. Hsu, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, Finite-volume matrix Hamiltonian model for a ∆→ Nπ system, Phys. Rev. D 87 (9) (2013) 094510.arXiv:1303.4157, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.87.094510

    2013 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Li, J.-j

    Y . Li, J.-j. Wu, C. D. Abell, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, Partial Wave Mixing in Hamiltonian Effective Field Theory, PoS LATTICE2019 (2019) 002. arXiv:1912.04810, doi:10.22323/1.363.0002

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Li, J.-j

    Y . Li, J.-j. Wu, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, Hamiltonian e ffective field theory in elongated or moving finite volume, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) (2021) 094518. arXiv:2103.12260, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103. 094518. 17

    2021 arXiv

  59. [243]

    arXiv:hep-lat/0507006, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005. 08.029

    2005 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.