Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Post-inflationary enhancement of adiabatic perturbations in modular cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in multi-field modular inflation with negligible turning during inflation, entropic perturbations can be efficiently converted into curvature perturbations after inflation ends, producing a new enhanced plateau in…

desk verdict Credible, clearly written demonstration of post-inflationary adiabatic enhancement in modular models, but the load-bearing plateau is only checked to N=3 and the paper's own j-function appendix shows the same mechanism failing to saturate. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03610 v1 pith:KWBWKYTZ submitted 2025-07-04 astro-ph.CO

Rodrigo Gonzalez Quaglia , Martino Michelotti , Diederik Roest , John Joseph Carrasco , Renata Kallosh , Andrei Linde This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO PACS 98.80.Cq
keywords modularcosmologySL(2Z)invariancealpha-attractorsmulti-fieldinflationadiabatic-entropicdecompositioncurvaturepowerspectrumisocurvatureperturbationspost-inflationaryevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cosmological models with two scalar fields usually convert entropic (isocurvature) perturbations into curvature perturbations while the field-space trajectory turns during inflation. This paper claims that the conversion can instead happen after inflation, in models where the trajectory is geodesic during inflation and the entropic direction is nearly massless, because the turning rate becomes large once the fields begin oscillating toward their minima. In the modular-invariant and hyperbolic potentials studied numerically, the curvature power spectrum grows into a new, enhanced plateau within a few oscillations after inflation. If correct, the CMB amplitude $A_s$ is enhanced by a model- and initial-condition-dependent factor, the spectral index stays at the $\alpha$-attractor value $n_s \approx 1 - 2/N_{hc}$, and the tensor-to-scalar ratio is correspondingly reduced.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the adiabatic-entropic decomposition of the two-field system, with unit vectors along and orthogonal to the background trajectory, together with the turning rate $\eta_\perp$, which measures how much the field-space trajectory bends per Hubble time. On super-horizon scales the curvature perturbation obeys $\dot{\mathcal R} = 2H\eta_\perp \mathcal S$ up to a term suppressed by $a^3$, so any significant turning converts isocurvature $\mathcal S$ into curvature $\mathcal R$. The models are built so that $\eta_\perp$ is exponentially small during inflation but jumps to large values after inflation, making the post-inflationary conversion efficient. The potentials are a modular-invariant one based on the Dedekind eta function, with double-exponential flatness in the axion direction, and a simpler hyperbolic-tangent toy model that reproduces the same qualitative behavior; the perturbations are evolved numerically from Bunch-Davies initial conditions through the first three e-folds after inflation.

What would settle it

Evolve the same perturbation system for ten or more e-folds after inflation, including a small dissipative term to mimic reheating, and check whether the curvature power spectrum remains flat; in particular, for the $j$-function model at $\theta_{in}=0.3$ the paper's own Figure 10 shows the power spectrum still growing at $N=3$, so a longer run that continues to grow would falsify the plateau claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that multi-field inflationary models with negligible turning in field space during inflation can nevertheless generate a large, effective sourcing of adiabatic from entropic perturbations immediately after inflation ends. The paper demonstrates this with two scalar fields in a hyperbolic field-space metric: during inflation the axion-like field $\theta$ is frozen because its potential is extremely flat, so its perturbations are isocurvature modes that stay decoupled and retain an amplitude proportional to $N_{hc}^2$; once $\varphi$ oscillates around its minimum and $\theta$ rolls to its own minimum, the turning rate $\eta_\perp$ becomes of order 10 to 100, converting isocurvature into curvature power through the super-horizon relation $\dot{\mathcal R} = 2H\eta_\perp \mathcal S$. The resulting curvature power spectrum reaches a plateau roughly one to three e-folds after inflation, with an enhancement $\mathcal{E} = P_{\mathcal R}^s/P_{\mathcal R}^0$ that depends strongly on the initial value of $\theta$. The authors conclude that $A_s$ is set by the enhanced value, that the spectral index remains $n_s \approx 1 - 2/N_{hc}$ because both vacuum and sourced pieces scale as $N_{hc}^2$, and that $r$ is suppressed by $\mathcal{E}$ relative to the single-field $\alpha$-attractor prediction.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the assumption that the conversion from entropic to curvature perturbations stops growing and stabilizes within the first few oscillations after inflation; the numerical runs stop at about three e-folds after inflation, and the paper itself notes a case in the $j$-function model where the power spectrum is still rising at that point, so if the plateau is not stable the predicted enhancement and observables change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the plateau is real, the scalar amplitude must be matched to the COBE normalization after enhancement, so the underlying potential scale $V_0$ is smaller by a factor $\mathcal{E}$ than in single-field models with the same $A_s$.
  • The scalar spectral index remains $n_s \approx 1 - 2/N_{hc}$, identical to single-field $\alpha$-attractors, because both the vacuum and sourced curvature amplitudes inherit the same $N_{hc}^2$ scaling.
  • The tensor-to-scalar ratio is predicted to be $r \approx 12\alpha/(\mathcal{E} N_{hc}^2)$, suppressed by the enhancement factor; a measurement of $r$ below the standard $\alpha$-attractor prediction, with unchanged $n_s$, would be the observational signature.
  • The enhancement is strongly initial-condition dependent; for the modular potential, the sharp dependence at $\theta_{in} \lesssim 0.4$ suggests potentially large non-Gaussianity, which the authors leave to future work.
  • Reheating can be neglected during the first oscillations for weakly coupled fields, but the analysis constrains perturbative reheating temperatures to roughly $10^{12}$-$10^{13}$ GeV for the runs at $N=3$ to be valid, and non-perturbative resonance, if present, would occur after the plateau forms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if post-inflationary conversion of this kind is generic, then the standard single-field attractor predictions for $A_s$ and $r$ should be re-derived for any model with a light, frozen entropic direction, not only modular or hyperbolic potentials.
  • Beyond the paper, the plateau-stability assumption is the most exposed link: running the perturbation evolution past $N=3$ with reheating friction would either confirm that the plateau is a genuine attractor or reveal that the continued growth seen for the $j$-function model at some initial angles is the generic behavior, which would alter the predicted $n_s$ and $r$.
  • Beyond the paper, the strong sensitivity to $\theta_{in}$ suggests that the initial axion angle, often treated as an irrelevant detail, becomes a physical parameter controlling both the amplitude and the level of non-Gaussianity; future CMB measurements of $r$ and $f_{\rm NL}$ could in principle constrain it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies two-field inflationary models on a hyperbolic field-space manifold, namely a modular-invariant model based on the Dedekind eta function and a simpler hyperbolic toy potential. During inflation, the axionic direction θ is frozen and the turning rate is negligible, so the curvature power spectrum follows the single-field α-attractor prediction. The main new claim is that after inflation the trajectory turns sharply, the entropic perturbations source the adiabatic ones, and the curvature power spectrum reaches an enhanced plateau within about three e-folds. The paper defines an enhancement factor E, reports that the spectral index remains approximately 1 − 2/Nhc while the tensor-to-scalar ratio is reduced by E, and gives order-of-magnitude reheating constraints. An appendix applies the same analysis to the j-function modular model and finds a plateau only for some initial conditions.

Significance. If the saturation claim is correct, the paper establishes a novel and observationally relevant mechanism: multi-field models with negligible turning during inflation can nevertheless have their curvature power spectrum strongly modified after the end of inflation, with ns preserved but r suppressed by E. The numerical treatment solves the full background and linear perturbation system without slow-roll assumptions, and the super-horizon equations are derived exactly, which are genuine strengths. The paper is also honest about the counterexample in Appendix A.1, where the j-function model does not plateau for θin = 0.3. The significance, however, hinges entirely on the plateau being asymptotic before reheating, and that point is not yet demonstrated for the main models. The paper explicitly stops all evolution at N ≃ 3 and does not report longer-time runs for the Dedekind and hyperbolic potentials.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1 and Appendix A.1, Figs. 7 and 10] The central claim that the curvature power spectrum reaches a stable plateau is supported only up to N = 3. All main-text numerical evolutions stop at N ≃ 3, and the only extended-time check reported is negative: for the j-function model with θin = 0.3, the paper states that 'both the curvature and isocurvature perturbations continue to grow up to N ∼ 3 and beyond' and that 'the plateau ... is not stable if we evolve for a longer amount of e-folds'. Since E, ns, and r are read off at N = 3, continued growth after N = 3 would change all three observational predictions. The authors should either evolve the Dedekind and hyperbolic models for enough e-folds to demonstrate an asymptotic plateau, or provide an analytical criterion for saturation and explicitly bound the residual growth after N = 3.
  2. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.6)–(4.8) and Fig. 9] The argument that npost_s = nend_s assumes that the enhancement factor E is independent of Nhc. The paper's heuristic estimate of δθ in Eq. (4.6) treats |N| as constant over a Hubble time, which is only a leading-order statement, and the numerical check in Fig. 9 is performed only at N = 3 and shows small deviations from exact N²hc scaling. If E acquires any Nhc dependence or if the spectrum continues to grow after N = 3, the spectral index after enhancement will differ from 1 − 2/Nhc by terms of order 1/N²hc or larger. The authors should quantify these corrections or demonstrate that E is Nhc-independent to the accuracy needed for the claimed ns and r predictions.
  3. [§4.3, Reheating considerations] The reheating analysis bounds only a perturbative decay rate Γ ≲ H/10 and does not address parametric resonance, which the paper itself notes can occur within O(10) oscillations. Since the claimed plateau forms within the first one to three oscillations, the statement 'we do not expect any reheating-related effects at this early stage' is not a quantitative check. A dedicated estimate of nonperturbative particle production in these models, or at least an explicit statement that the plateau result is conditional on negligible resonant effects during the first few oscillations, is needed before the observational claims can be considered robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, after Eq. (2.18)] The text reads 'a set ofzweibeins'; this should be 'a set of zweibeins'.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption refers to the 'analytical formula (first equation in Eq. (2.21))', but Eq. (2.21) defines the turning rate; the analytical large-φ estimates are in Eq. (2.28). The reference should be corrected.
  3. [Eq. (4.6)] The derivation of δθ = (H/2π) sqrt(2/(3α)) Nhc treats |N| as constant over a Hubble time. This should be flagged as a leading-order estimate, since |N| changes by ΔN = 1 and the omitted corrections are of the same order as the deviations visible in Fig. 9.
  4. [Global notation] The symbol η is used for conformal time in Eq. (3.23) and also appears in η⊥, ηH, and ηD. Consider using a distinct symbol for conformal time to avoid confusion.
  5. [General] Since the numerical results are a central part of the paper, a short statement on code and data availability would improve reproducibility; no public code is mentioned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the post-inflationary enhancement is computed numerically from the full two-field perturbation system and compared with a single-field baseline, while the analytical scalings used are rederived in the paper rather than assumed as outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that multi-field models with negligible turning during inflation can source adiabatic from entropic perturbations after inflation, producing an enhanced curvature plateau. This is obtained by numerically evolving the coupled R-S system (Eqs. 3.7-3.8) from Bunch-Davies initial conditions, with no parameter fitted to the claimed enhancement. The analytical inputs are derived in the text: the double-exponential suppression of the modular potential (Eq. 2.5), the effective isocurvature masses (Eqs. 3.17-3.18), the small turning rate during inflation (Eq. 2.28 and Fig. 4), and the N_hc^2 scaling of isocurvature perturbations (Eqs. 4.3-4.6). Citation to Ref. [13] supports the double-exponential behavior, but the present paper derives the analogous expressions for its own models and numerically confirms them, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The observables A_s, n_s, and r follow algebraically from the computed enhancement E and the rederived N_hc^2 scaling: A_s is set by COBE normalization, n_s is preserved because both the end-of-inflation and post-enhancement spectra scale as N_hc^2 (Fig. 9), and r is reduced by the factor E by definition. No equation is used to define its own prediction, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior work. The paper's own caveat about the j-function model showing continued growth for theta_in=0.3 (Appendix A.1) is a robustness concern about plateau stability beyond N=3, not a circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model depends on standard potential parameters (V0, alpha, beta) and the initial axion position theta_in; no new particles or forces are introduced. The main unproved inputs are the validity of the linear perturbation equations through the oscillatory post-inflationary phase, the stability of the plateau by N=3, and the neglect of reheating within this window.

free parameters (3)
  • V0 = ~10^-13 (modular, theta_in=0.3); ~10^-14 (other cases)
    Set by matching the enhanced curvature power spectrum to the COBE amplitude in Eq. (4.11).
  • alpha (3alpha) = 3alpha=1 in all numerical plots
    Curvature parameter of the hyperbolic field space; fixed to 1 for illustration, not fitted to data.
  • beta = beta approximately 0.2 (1/5)
    Coefficient of the axion term in hyperbolic potential Eq. (2.11); chosen so the mass matrix at the minimum is proportional to identity.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The adiabatic-entropic decomposition and equations (3.7)-(3.8) describe the linear perturbations on super-horizon scales also for epsilon > 1 and during post-inflationary oscillations.
    Used to evolve R and S after inflation; the paper argues no slow-roll assumption is needed, but the rapid oscillation and large turning rate eta_perp ~ 100 place this extrapolation outside the tested regime. Invoked in Section 4.1 around Eqs. (3.12)-(3.13).
  • domain assumption The potential has a strongly suppressed theta-dependence at large phi, keeping theta frozen during inflation.
    Central to the claim of negligible turning during inflation; verified numerically but derived from asymptotic expansions Eq. (2.5) and (2.12).
  • domain assumption The post-inflationary evolution for the first few e-folds can be treated with Gamma = 0 (no reheating), and the plateau forms before reheating matters.
    The paper estimates Gamma < H/10 by N=3, but this is an order-of-magnitude constraint; parametric resonance is not analyzed. See Section 4.3.
  • standard math Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions in the deep sub-horizon limit.
    Standard quantization choice for inflationary perturbations; used in Section 3.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Post-inflationary enhancement of adiabatic perturbations in modular cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KWBWKYTZ

@misc{pith2026250703610,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Post-inflationary enhancement of adiabatic perturbations in modular cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KWBWKYTZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03610}
}
abstract

We show that multi-field inflationary models with negligible turning in field space during inflation can lead to an effective sourcing of adiabatic from entropic perturbations {\it after} the end of inflation. We illustrate this general phenomenon with a detailed analysis of an inflationary model whose scalar potential is determined by modular invariance. Its entropic perturbations are frozen during inflation, but instead, they are converted into adiabatic perturbations in the first post-inflationary $e$-folds. The curvature power spectrum, giving rise to CMB fluctuations, reaches a novel and enhanced plateau in this process; we address the implications for the inflationary observables $A_{s}$, $n_{s}$ and $r$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ultra slow-turn inflation

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In slow-roll multi-field inflation, stability should be read from the total entropy perturbation, which decays in 'ultra slow-turn' models even when the isocurvature effective mass-squared is negative.

  2. Fibre Inflation Meets Quintessence: Implications of Perturbative Stabilisation

    hep-th 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a base-modulus redefinition to fibre inflation in perturbative LVS shifts (ns, r) into ACT-allowed territory and yields an axion quintessence companion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [13]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Double Exponents in SL(2, Z) Cosmology, 2412.19324

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

    work page 1981

  3. [2]

    A. D. Linde, The Inflationary Universe , Rept. Prog. Phys. 47 (1984) 925

    work page 1984

  4. [3]

    D. H. Lyth and A. Riotto, Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation, Phys. Rept. 314 (1999) 1 [ hep-ph/9807278]

    arXiv 1999

  5. [4]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation , Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 177

    work page 1983

  6. [5]

    A. D. Linde, Hybrid inflation , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 748 [ astro-ph/9307002]

    arXiv 1994

  7. [6]

    Warm inflation solution to the eta-problem

    A. Berera, Warm inflation solution to the eta problem , PoS AHEP2003 (2003) 069 [hep-ph/0401139]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  8. [7]

    D. A. Easson and R. Gregory, Circumventing the eta problem , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083518 [0902.1798]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Ashoorioon, U

    A. Ashoorioon, U. Danielsson and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, 1/N resolution to inflationary η-problem, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 353 [ 1112.2272]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Freese, J

    K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto, Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 3233

    1990

  3. [10]

    F. C. Adams, J. R. Bond, K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto, Natural inflation: Particle physics models, power law spectra for large scale structure, and constraints from COBE, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 426 [ hep-ph/9207245]

    1993 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, SL(2,Z) cosmological attractors, JCAP 04 (2025) 045 [2408.05203]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Landscape of Modular Cosmology, 2411.07552

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ding, S.-Y

    G.-J. Ding, S.-Y. Jiang, Y. Xu and W. Zhao, Modular invariant inflation, reheating and leptogenesis, 2411.18603

  7. [15]

    Aoki and H

    S. Aoki and H. Otsuka, Inflationary constraints on the moduli-dependent species scale in modular invariant theories , 2411.08467

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. J. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, Axion Stabilization in Modular Cosmology, 2503.14904

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    S. Aoki, H. Otsuka and R. Yanagita, Higgs-Modular Inflation, 2504.01622

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Universality Class in Conformal Inflation , JCAP 07 (2013) 002 [1306.5220]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Roest, Universality classes of inflation , JCAP 01 (2014) 007 [ 1309.1285]

    D. Roest, Universality classes of inflation , JCAP 01 (2014) 007 [ 1309.1285]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and M. Porrati, Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 085038 [ 1307.7696]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Non-minimal Inflationary Attractors , JCAP 10 (2013) 033 [1307.7938]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Multi-field Conformal Cosmological Attractors , JCAP 12 (2013) 006 [1309.2015]. – 28 –

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, Superconformal Inflationary α-Attractors, JHEP 11 (2013) 198 [ 1311.0472]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, Universal Attractor for Inflation at Strong Coupling , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 011303 [ 1310.3950]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cecotti and R

    S. Cecotti and R. Kallosh, Cosmological Attractor Models and Higher Curvature Supergravity, JHEP 05 (2014) 114 [ 1403.2932]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, Large field inflation and double α-attractors, JHEP 08 (2014) 052 [ 1405.3646]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, The double attractor behavior of induced inflation , JHEP 09 (2014) 062 [ 1407.4471]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Galante, R

    M. Galante, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, Unity of Cosmological Inflation Attractors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 141302 [ 1412.3797]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and A. Linde, α-Attractors: Planck, LHC and Dark Energy , JHEP 10 (2015) 147 [ 1506.01708]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Cosmological Attractors and Initial Conditions for Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 063519 [ 1506.00936]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Minimal supergravity inflation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 061301 [ 1512.00546]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D. Roest and T. Wrase, Sneutrino inflation with α-attractors, JCAP 11 (2016) 046 [ 1607.08854]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Iacconi, M

    L. Iacconi, M. Bacchi, L. F. Guimar˜ aes and F. T. Falciano, Testing inflation on all scales: a case study with α-attractors, JCAP 06 (2025) 004 [ 2412.02544]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Germ´ an, R

    G. Germ´ an, R. G. Quaglia and A. M. M. Colorado, Model independent bounds for the number of e-folds during the evolution of the universe , JCAP 03 (2023) 004 [ 2212.03730]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Iacconi, M

    L. Iacconi, M. Fasiello, J. V¨ aliviita and D. Wands, Novel CMB constraints on the α parameter in alpha-attractor models , JCAP 10 (2023) 015 [ 2306.00918]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest, Hyperbolic geometry of cosmological attractors, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 041301 [ 1504.05557]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Attractors in Supergravity, 2503.13682

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Iarygina, E

    O. Iarygina, E. I. Sfakianakis, D.-G. Wang and A. Ach´ ucarro, Multi-field inflation and preheating in asymmetric α-attractors, 2005.00528

    2005 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ach´ ucarro, R

    A. Ach´ ucarro, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D.-G. Wang and Y. Welling, Universality of multi-field α-attractors, JCAP 04 (2018) 028 [ 1711.09478]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Wands, Multiple field inflation , Lect

    D. Wands, Multiple field inflation , Lect. Notes Phys. 738 (2008) 275 [ astro-ph/0702187]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations from inflation: Power spectra and consistency relations , Physical Review D 64 (2001)

    2001

  34. [42]

    Pinol, Multifield aspects in the early Universe : Inflation and Reheating , Ph.D

    L. Pinol, Multifield aspects in the early Universe : Inflation and Reheating , Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne Universit´ e, Paris, Inst. Astrophys., 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Iacconi, H

    L. Iacconi, H. Assadullahi, M. Fasiello and D. Wands, Revisiting small-scale fluctuations in α-attractor models of inflation , JCAP 06 (2022) 007 [ 2112.05092]. – 29 –

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fumagalli, S

    J. Fumagalli, S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and J. Ronayne, Hyper-Non-Gaussianities in Inflation with Strongly Nongeodesic Motion , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 201302 [ 1902.03221]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Christodoulidis, D

    P. Christodoulidis, D. Roest and E. I. Sfakianakis, Scaling attractors in multi-field inflation , JCAP 12 (2019) 059 [ 1903.06116]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bjorkmo, Rapid-Turn Inflationary Attractors, Phys

    T. Bjorkmo, Rapid-Turn Inflationary Attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 251301 [1902.10529]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ach´ ucarro and Y

    A. Ach´ ucarro and Y. Welling,Orbital Inflation: inflating along an angular isometry of field space, 1907.02020

    1907 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ach´ ucarro, E

    A. Ach´ ucarro, E. J. Copeland, O. Iarygina, G. A. Palma, D.-G. Wang and Y. Welling, Shift-symmetric orbital inflation: Single field or multifield? , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 021302 [1901.03657]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Iarygina, M

    O. Iarygina, M. C. D. Marsh and G. Salinas, Non-Gaussianity in rapid-turn multi-field inflation, JCAP 03 (2024) 014 [ 2303.14156]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    C. M. Peterson and M. Tegmark, Non-Gaussianity in Two-Field Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 023520 [ 1011.6675]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A. D. Linde, Particle physics and inflationary cosmology , vol. 5. 1990, [ hep-th/0503203]

    1990 arXiv

  44. [52]

    McDonald, Reheating temperature and inflaton mass bounds from thermalization after inflation, Phys

    J. McDonald, Reheating temperature and inflaton mass bounds from thermalization after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 083513 [ hep-ph/9909467]

    2000 arXiv

  45. [53]

    E. W. Kolb, A. Notari and A. Riotto, On the Reheating Stage after Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 123505 [ hep-ph/0307241]

    2003 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99

    1980

  47. [55]

    D. S. Gorbunov and A. G. Panin, Scalaron the mighty: producing dark matter and baryon asymmetry at reheating , Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 157 [ 1009.2448]

    2011 arXiv

  48. [56]

    J. L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D. A. Easson and L. M. Krauss, Reheating predictions in single field inflation , JCAP 04 (2015) 047 [ 1502.04673]

    2015 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. A. G. Garcia, G. Germ´ an, R. Gonzalez Quaglia and A. M. M. Colorado, Reheating constraints and consistency relations of the Starobinsky model and some of its generalizations, JCAP 12 (2023) 015 [ 2306.15831]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, Reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3195 [ hep-th/9405187]

    1994 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3258 [ hep-ph/9704452]. – 30 –

    1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.