Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Exploring Cosmological Implications of the Modified Raychaudhuri Equation in Non-Gravitating Vacuum Energy Theory

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In Non-Gravitating Vacuum Energy theory, the modified Raychaudhuri equation gains an interaction term $f(\chi)$ that decides between accelerated expansion, collapse, and steady state, with the $f(\chi)=0$ limit reproducing observed…

desk verdict A well-organized paper on the modified Raychaudhuri equation in NGVE theory, but the central derivation contains load-bearing errors that invalidate the main claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08094 v1 pith:LAV4GWDW submitted 2025-02-12 gr-qc hep-th

Arijit Panda , Eduardo Guendelman , Goutam Manna This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83F0583D05 PACS 04.20.-q98.80.-k95.36.+x
keywords Raychaudhuriequationnon-gravitatingvacuumenergyconformalgeometryFLRWcosmologydarkfocusingtheoremscalarfieldcosmologicalconstantproblem
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that when the Raychaudhuri equation is built in the conformally modified geometry of Non-Gravitating Vacuum Energy (NGVE) theory, the usual collapse prediction is no longer inevitable. The modified acceleration equation acquires an extra term $f(\chi)$ built from the conformal factor $\chi$, and the sign of $f(\chi)$ relative to shear and matter decides between accelerated expansion without singularity, decelerating collapse, and a steady-state universe. In the special case $f(\chi)=0$ the theory yields epoch-dependent scale factors whose dark-energy-era solution accelerates in line with supernova and cosmic-microwave-background observations. The paper also derives scalar-field solutions for exponential and power-law scale factors and studies caustic formation and the focusing theorem in the modified geometry. If correct, the framework connects the old cosmological-constant problem to a single scalar-field-dependent geometry that can reproduce the observed late-time acceleration.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the conformally modified metric $\bar g_{\mu\nu} = \chi g_{\mu\nu}$, with $\chi = 2U(\phi)/(M+V(\phi)) = 2f_2 e^{2\alpha\phi}/(M+f_1 e^{\alpha\phi})$, which defines the NGVE geometry in which the Raychaudhuri equation is written. The identity that carries the argument is the interaction term $f(\chi) = \frac13(\dot\chi/\chi)^2 - \frac23(\ddot\chi/\chi)$ appearing in the final acceleration equation; through the $\phi$-dependence of $\chi$ it becomes Eq. (53), a function of $\ddot\phi$, $\dot\phi^2$, and exponentials of $\phi$. The derivation combines the commutation relation (23), the expansion-shear-vorticity decomposition (28), and the perfect-fluid form of the effective energy-momentum tensor (43) to convert the geometry into cosmology.

What would settle it

Compute $v^\nu\bar\nabla_\nu v^\mu$ for $v^\mu=(1,0,0,0)$ using the barred connection coefficients (39): it equals $(\dot\chi/\chi)\delta^\mu_0$, which is nonzero whenever $\chi$ varies in time. Since the barred metric gives $d\bar s=\sqrt{\chi}\,dt$, replacing the paper's $dt/d\bar s=1$ with $dt/d\bar s=\chi^{-1/2}$ in Eq. (50) changes the left side of the acceleration equation and alters $f(\chi)$; this direct calculation settles whether Eq. (51) is the correct modified Raychaudhuri equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in NGVE theory the timelike Raychaudhuri equation reduces to the acceleration equation (51), $\ddot a/a = [-(2/3)\sigma^2 + (2/3)\omega^2 - (4\pi G/3)(\bar\rho+3\bar p)] + f(\chi)$, with $f(\chi) = \frac13(\dot\chi/\chi)^2 - \frac23(\ddot\chi/\chi)$. Depending on the sign and size of $f(\chi)$ compared with the shear and effective matter terms, the same geometrical framework produces an accelerating universe without a big-bang singularity (condition 54), a collapsing universe (55), or a steady-state universe (56). The paper further claims that setting $f(\chi)=0$ does not eliminate the new geometry: it forces $\chi$ to a quadratic function of time (68), and through the modified density and pressure it yields scale factors for the phantom, dark-energy, dust, early-universe, and stiff-fluid epochs; the dark-energy-era scale factor gives accelerating expansion consistent with observations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation rests on treating the comoving velocity field as a freely falling congruence of the conformally modified geometry, with cosmic time serving as the affine parameter; a time-dependent conformal factor makes that premise false by direct computation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $f(\chi) > \frac23\sigma^2 + \frac{4\pi G}{3}(\bar\rho+3\bar p)$, the model predicts an accelerating expansion without a big-bang singularity, the opposite of standard geodesic focusing.
  • If $f(\chi)$ falls below that threshold, the model gives a decelerating, collapsing universe consistent with the usual Raychaudhuri behavior.
  • If the two sides are equal, the model yields a steady-state universe with $\ddot a/a=0$.
  • In the $f(\chi)=0$ case, $\chi(t)$ becomes a quadratic function of time and the modified density and pressure generate scale factors for the phantom, dark-energy, dust, early-universe, and stiff-fluid epochs.
  • The dark-energy-era scale factor from the $f(\chi)=0$ case shows exponentially growing acceleration, matching supernova and CMB observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The geodesic assumption behind Eq. (51) is testable: for $v^\mu=(1,0,0,0)$, the barred connection gives $v^\nu\bar\nabla_\nu v^\mu=(\dot\chi/\chi)\delta^\mu_0$, so the dropped acceleration term would add $\chi$-derivative corrections to $f(\chi)$ if the congruence is not truly geodesic.
  • Because the Raychaudhuri equation is a geometric identity, the same conditional-expansion results should be reproducible in the unbarred geometry with an effective fluid; if they are not, the predictions depend on the conformal frame.
  • The $f(\chi)=0$ solutions require $\chi(t)>0$ throughout to keep the metric Lorentzian, which imposes positivity constraints on the integration constants $c_1,c_2$ that the paper does not discuss.
  • The authors leave the constraint equations (74)-(75) unsolved; solving them would check whether the perfect-fluid $\bar\rho$ and $\bar p$ used in the acceleration equation are consistent with the scalar-field energy-momentum tensor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a Raychaudhuri equation in the conformal metric gbar = chi g of NGVE theory, applies it to a flat FLRW universe with comoving velocity field, and obtains the acceleration equation (51) with an extra interaction term f(chi). It then uses the sign of f(chi) relative to shear and matter terms to classify expansion, collapse, and steady-state regimes, solves the scalar-field equation of motion for exponential and power-law ansatze, studies the f(chi)=0 case through an assumed equation-of-state parameter for different cosmic epochs, and discusses focusing and caustics. The stated central result is that the modified Raychaudhuri equation can produce accelerated expansion, conditional collapse, or steady state depending on the scalar-field-dependent term f(chi).

Significance. The topic is relevant: deriving and testing modified Raychaudhuri equations in alternative gravity theories can clarify under what conditions the focusing theorem or cosmic acceleration arises. The paper usefully collects the NGVE formalism, the conformal transformation of the metric, and several explicit formulas for the conformal geometry. However, the central claim rests on a derivation that is not correct as written, and the phenomenological conclusions are either tautological or obtained by inserting the desired equation of state by hand. No falsifiable prediction or observational constraint is derived, and the paper explicitly leaves the consistency constraint equations (74) and (75) unsolved. If the main equations were valid, the classification in Section IV.A would be a useful organizing device, but the manuscript in its present form does not establish that validity.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (30)-(32) and Eq. (38)] The reduction from Eq. (30) to Eq. (32) is not correct as written. For the comoving FLRW congruence v^mu = (1,0,0,0), a direct evaluation of (nabla_mu v_nu)(nabla_nu v_mu) gives cross terms proportional to H chi_dot/chi, in particular a contribution 3H chi_dot/chi in the timelike component, which is absent from the simplified expression used in Eq. (38). This step is load-bearing because Eqs. (48) and (51) are obtained from Eq. (38). The authors should either display the full reduction of Eq. (30) or verify Eq. (38) by direct computation from the connection coefficients in Eq. (39).
  2. [Section III, Eqs. (25)-(27), and Section IV, Eq. (50)] The derivation assumes that v^mu is an affinely parametrized geodesic congruence in the barred geometry. For the comoving vector v^mu = (1,0,0,0), the connection coefficients in Eq. (39) give v^nu nabla_bar_nu v^mu = (chi_dot/chi) delta^mu_0, which is nonzero for time-dependent chi. Thus the congruence is not geodesic in gbar, and the term v^nu nabla_bar_nu v^mu cannot be dropped between Eqs. (25) and (27). Moreover, Eq. (34) gives d sbar = sqrt(chi) dt, so dt/d sbar is not 1 as assumed before Eq. (50). Both assumptions enter the derivation of Eqs. (48) and (51); without them, the claimed modified Raychaudhuri equation does not follow.
  3. [Section IV.A, Eqs. (60)-(61)] The claimed scalar-field solution (61) does not satisfy the equation of motion (60). Substituting chi_dot = (M + f1 e^{alpha phi}) e^{C1 - 2 alpha phi}/a^3 into the first term of Eq. (60) makes that term vanish identically because chi a^3 phi_dot becomes a constant, leaving only V'_eff(phi) = -(alpha M/(2 f2)) e^{-alpha phi}(f1 + M e^{-alpha phi}), which is generically nonzero. Equation (61) is therefore only a solution of the homogeneous equation without the potential term. Consequently the explicit profiles (65) and (67), and the plots of f(chi) in Figures 1-3 built from them, are not solutions of the stated NGVE theory.
  4. [Section IV.B, Table II and Fig. 4b] The accelerated dark-energy result is inserted by hand. Equation (71) is the definition of Omega = pbar/rhobar; solving it with Omega = -1 imposes a dark-energy equation of state a priori, and the resulting scale factor in Table II then yields accelerated expansion in Fig. 4b by construction. The same applies to the other rows of Table II, where Omega = -2, 0, 0.5, 1 are assigned to different epochs without derivation from the NGVE action or from the modified Friedmann equations (45) and (46). These plots therefore do not provide independent evidence that the model produces the observed epochs.
  5. [Section IV.A, Eqs. (54)-(56), and Figures 1-3] The three cases in Eqs. (54)-(56) are tautological restatements of the sign of [f(chi) - (2/3)sigma^2 - (4 pi G/3)(rhobar + 3 pbar)]. Because the free parameters A, B, M, f1, K, H0, and m are scanned without constraints in Figures 1-3, the paper does not determine which regime the model actually selects. Showing that f(chi) can be made positive, negative, or zero by choosing parameters is not the same as showing that the model predicts conditional expansion, collapse, and steady state; the central claim therefore lacks predictive content.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV.C] The focusing-theorem paragraph states that the strong energy condition is Rbar_{alpha beta} v^alpha v^beta >= 0, 'i.e., 4 pi G(rhobar + pbar) >= 0', but Eq. (44) gives Rbar_{alpha beta} v^alpha v^beta = 4 pi G(rhobar + 3 pbar); the pressure coefficient is inconsistent.
  2. [Eqs. (69)-(71)] The notation in these equations is ambiguous; for example, quantities such as c1^2 a^2 and c1 t + 2c2 appear without consistently displayed powers and parentheses. Please use explicit notation such as c_1^2 a^2 and (c_1 t + 2 c_2)^2.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including 'FLR W' instead of 'FLRW', 'functionf' in the caption of Fig. 1, and missing spaces in captions of Figs. 1-3; the manuscript should be carefully copyedited.
  4. [Section II, Eq. (22) and surrounding text] The point-particle discussion in Section II is not used in the derivation of Eqs. (48)-(51) or in the cosmological analysis; it would be clearer to state explicitly whether this material is needed for the later results or remove it.
  5. [Conclusion] The paper itself acknowledges that the constraint equations (74) and (75) are too complicated to solve and are left beyond the scope of the study; this is a significant limitation because those equations express the consistency of the two energy-momentum tensors used in the analysis, and it should be stated earlier in the paper.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The geometric RE derivation is independent, but the cosmological conclusions largely reduce to sign restatements of Eq. (51) or to assumed EoS values integrated as predictions.

  1. self definitional [Section IV.A, Eqs. (51)-(56)]
    ""Upon the condition of positivity, negativity or equality three cases can arise from Eq. (51). Case A: If f (χ) > 2 3 σ2 + 4πG 3 (¯ρ + 3¯p) (54) then we have ¨a a > 0 from (51).""

    Eq. (51) is the single identity ä/a = [−2σ²/3 + 2ω²/3 −4πG(ρ̄+3p̄)/3] + f(χ). Cases A, B and C are exactly the assertions that f(χ) is greater than, less than, or equal to the bracketed matter/shear term; substituting the inequality into the same equation gives the sign of ä/a by construction. No independent dynamics determines f(χ) in those cases, so the 'conditional expansion, collapse, steady state' models are not derived predictions but restatements of the defining inequalities.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section IV.B, Eq. (71), Table II, Fig. 4b]
    ""We use separate Ω values for different epochs to solve the scale factor for this unique instance with c3 and c4 being other integration constants. ... Ω = −1 corresponds the dark energy-dominated era""

    Ω = p̄/ρ̄ is assigned by hand for each cosmic era rather than obtained from the modified RE or NGVE dynamics. Solving Eq. (71) with Ω = −1 and then plotting ä/a as increasing in the dark-energy era (Fig. 4b) converts the assumed dark-energy equation of state into the 'observationally supported' acceleration. The output of the plot is the input value of Ω expressed through the Friedmann-type equations; this is a fitted/assumed parameter renamed as a prediction.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Section IV.C, Eqs. (77)-(79)]
    ""The nature of F (χ)(̸= 0) is undetermined, hence following [16], we take two cases Case I: If 2σ2 + 4πG(¯ρ + 3¯p) ≥ F (χ) (78)... Case II: If F (χ) > 2σ2 + 4πG(¯ρ + 3¯p), (79)""

    Eq. (77), dθ/dt + θ²/3 = −2σ² −4πG(ρ̄+3p̄) + F(χ), has F(χ) explicitly undetermined. The two 'caustic formation' cases are just the two possible signs of the right-hand side. Labeling Case I as a singular caustic and Case II as a possibly singularity-free universe restates the inequality; without a solution for F(χ) or an external condition selecting it, no dynamical prediction is made.

full rationale

The geometric derivation of the modified Raychaudhuri equation (Sections II-III, Eqs. (15)-(32)) is not circular: it starts from the NGVE conformal metric (15), the connection (17), and the standard RE identity (23)-(29), and the conformal transformation is worked out explicitly. The NGVE framework is imported from prior work by one of the authors ([30]-[33]), but that is background formalism, not a result being verified here, and the RE steps are stated equations that could be checked independently. The circularity is concentrated in the cosmological interpretation. Eq. (51) is a single algebraic identity; the expansion/collapse/steady-state trichotomy is a sign comparison of f(χ) against the matter+shear term, so those three 'models' are tautological. Likewise the f(χ)=0 analysis assumes the EoS value Ω for each epoch and integrates Eq. (71), so the accelerated dark-energy plot is the assumed Ω=−1 rewritten as a scale factor. The caustic classification repeats the same inequality-restatement pattern. These are real reductions by construction, but they do not invalidate the underlying RE derivation, hence a score of 7 rather than 8-10. The additional reader concern that vμ=(1,0,0,0) with dt/ds̄=1 is inconsistent with the barred geodesic condition is a correctness issue, not a circularity, and is not counted here.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on a set of free parameters and on field equations imported from prior NGVE work. No new particles or forces are introduced, but the paper's own equations contain unchecked assumptions about the geometric meaning of the congruence and the validity of the scalar solution.

free parameters (7)
  • α = not fixed, α > 0
    Exponent in V=f1 e^{αϕ}, U=f2 e^{2αϕ} (Eq. 10); determines χ(ϕ) and f(χ).
  • f1, f2 = not fixed
    Amplitudes of the potentials in Eq. (10); enter χ and V_eff.
  • M = varied: 0, ±1, ±10 in plots
    Constant L1=M (Eq. 9); appears in χ and in the scalar solution (61); the solution is only consistent for M=0.
  • Integration constants C1, C2, K = not specified for plots
    Constants in ϕ(t) solutions (65), (67); sign of f(χ) depends on them.
  • c1, c2, c3, c4 = varied in figures
    Constants in χ(t) (68) and scale-factor solutions in Table II.
  • H0 and m = H0, m > 0; varied (m) in Fig. 3
    Hubble parameter in exponential scale factor (63) and power-law exponent (66); inputs, not derived.
  • Ω epoch values = Ω = -2, -1, 0, 0.5, 1
    Equation-of-state parameter assigned to each era in the f(χ)=0 analysis; the acceleration behavior follows from this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption NGVE theory: the action uses a measure field Φ and scalar potentials V, U with global scale invariance (sources [30-33]).
    The whole framework is imported from prior work, including by co-author Guendelman; this paper does not test it.
  • domain assumption The conformal factor χ = 2U/(M+V) and the effective potential V_eff = (1/(4U))(V+M)^2 (Eqs. 13, 21).
    Taken from NGVE theory; not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Matter is a perfect fluid in the modified geometry with \bar T^{eff}_{αβ} = (\barρ+\bar p)v_αv_β - \bar g_{αβ}\bar p (Eq. 43).
    Assumed without derivation; the paper itself notes the constraint equations (74)-(75) from two energy-momentum tensors are unsolved.
  • ad hoc to paper The congruence v^μ=(1,0,0,0) is affinely parameterized and geodesic in the barred geometry, and dt/d\bar s = 1.
    Used to drop the term \bar∇_μ(v^ν\bar∇_νv^μ) and to set dΘ̄/ds̄ = dΘ̄/dt (Eqs. 25-27, 50). Direct computation with the barred connection gives v^ν\bar∇_νv^μ = (χ̇/χ)δ^μ_0 ≠ 0 and d\bar s = √χ dt, so the assumption fails when χ varies.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar-field EoM (57) with V_eff from (21) and the solution (61) for arbitrary M.
    Eq. (61) does not satisfy Eq. (60) unless M=0; the paper uses it for all M in the figures.
  • standard math The RE is a purely geometric identity and can be written in the barred geometry with the unbarred shear, vorticity and expansion variables (Eqs. 30-32).
    Standard RE identity, but the transformation used by the paper is incorrect (missing θχ̇/χ term).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Cosmological Implications of the Modified Raychaudhuri Equation in Non-Gravitating Vacuum Energy Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LAV4GWDW

@misc{pith2026250208094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Cosmological Implications of the Modified Raychaudhuri Equation in Non-Gravitating Vacuum Energy Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LAV4GWDW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08094}
}
abstract

This article investigates the modified Raychaudhuri Equation (RE) in the context of Non-Gravitating Vacuum Energy (NGVE) theory and its implications for various cosmological characteristics. The equation is formulated based on the NGVE framework, in which global scale invariance generates a unique geometry. The newly developed geometry introduces a metric that is conformally connected to the conventional metric, with the conformal factor dependent on scalar field potentials. The cosmological study is carried out under the framework of a flat Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) universe. Assuming matter behaves as an ideal fluid in the modified geometry, we formulate models for conditional expansion, collapse, and steady state, governed by the scalar field ($\phi$). In this context, the caustic solution and the focusing theorem are also studied. Scalar field solutions for exponential and power-law scale factors are also derived using NGVE theory's equations of motion. Finally, graphical analysis is used to investigate the behavior of the interaction terms that appear in the modified RE under these scale factors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08094 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Variation of f(χ) with t for (a) different f1 and (b) different A (a) Variation of f(χ) with t for varying B (b) Variation of f(χ) with t for varying M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variation of f(χ) with t for different (a) B and (b) M Figure (2b) is the variation of f(χ) with time for different values of M (−10, −1, 0, 1, 10). For all possible values of M the nature of f(χ) is positive. In Figs. (1b) and (2a), it is seen that in some instances, f(χ) = 0 for all values of t, while in all cases, f(χ) attains a value of zero at a certain time. Consequently, it is essential to examine the situati… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Variation of f(χ) with t for varying m for Power Law scale factor B. Analysis for f(χ) = 0 From Eq. (51), it is evident that when f(χ) = 0, a specific form of modified geometry is obtained, wherein the conformal factor χ does not exhibit direct dependence; however, it is indirectly manifested through the modified density (ρ¯) and pressure (p¯), as demonstrated in Eqs. (45) and (46). Furthermore, we get an explicit t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of a¨ a with t for (a) Ω = −2 and (b) Ω = −1 [f(χ) = 0) case] Figs. (4a) and (4b) represent the variation of a¨ a with cosmic time when c1 is varied for Ω = −2 (phantom era) and Ω = −1 (dark energy era) respectively. Figs. (5a) and (5b) respectively illustrat…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variation of a¨ a with t for (a) Ω = 0 and (b) Ω = 0.5 [f(χ) = 0) case] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variation of a¨ a for Ω = 1 (stiff fluid era) [f(χ) = 0 case] Studying these graphs we get that in the phantom era the acceleration drops exponentially to the zero value as time progresses (Fig. 4a) whereas, in the dark energy-dominated era the acceleration increases r…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamical mechanism of vacuum energy compensation

    gr-qc 2025-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A scalar field with nonlinear coupling to curvature dynamically drives the Ricci scalar to zero, converting de Sitter expansion into H=1/(2t).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (54), (55), and (56)

    Behavior of f (χ) through the Solution of the Equation of Motion It is evident from the three situations (Case A, Case B, and Case C) mentioned above that f (χ) must be either positive or negative in order to maintain the requirements stated in Eqs. (54), (55), and (56). Therefore, it is crucial to identify whether f (χ) is positive or negative. To unders...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Remarks on Newtonian Cosmology. I

    O. Heckmann and E. Schucking, “Remarks on Newtonian Cosmology. I”, Z. Astrophysik 38, 95 (1955) https: //adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1955ZA.....38...95H

    work page 1955

  3. [3]

    (50) as d ¯Θ d¯s = dθ dt + 2 ¨χ χ − 2 ˙χ χ 2 (76) where dθ dt = 3 ¨a a − 3 ˙a a 2 , which is the usual scalar expansion of the flat FLR W spacetime

    Caustic formation Let’s represent Eq. (50) as d ¯Θ d¯s = dθ dt + 2 ¨χ χ − 2 ˙χ χ 2 (76) where dθ dt = 3 ¨a a − 3 ˙a a 2 , which is the usual scalar expansion of the flat FLR W spacetime. Therefore, for ω2 = 0, using Eqs. (76), (50) and (48), we have dθ dt + 1 3 θ2 = −2σ2 − 4πG(¯ρ + 3¯p) + F (χ) (77) where F (χ) = −2 ¨χ χ + ( ˙χ χ )2. A similar type of inv...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Relativistic Cosmology. I

    A. Raychaudhuri, “Relativistic Cosmology. I”, Phys. Rev. 98, 1123 (1955) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev. 98.1123

    doi:10.1103/physrev 1955

  5. [5]

    The Raychaudhuri equations: A brief review

    S. Kar and S. Sengupta, “The Raychaudhuri equations: A brief review”, Pramana - J. Phys. 69, 49 (2007) https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119438891

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Relativistic and Newtonian cosmology

    A. Raychaudhuri, “Relativistic and Newtonian cosmology”, Z. Astrophys. 43, 161 (1957) https://adsabs. harvard.edu/full/1957ZA.....43..161R

    work page 1957

  7. [7]

    General Relativity, Astrophysics and Cosmology

    A. K. Raychaudhuri, S. Banerji and A. Banerjee, “General Relativity, Astrophysics and Cosmology”, (Astronomy & Astrophysics Library, Springer (2003) https://link.springer.com/book/9780387406282

    arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Implications of Raychaudhuri equation and geodesic focusing in interacting two fluid systems

    M Chakraborty, S Chakraborty, “Implications of Raychaudhuri equation and geodesic focusing in interacting two fluid systems”, Eur. Phys. J. C 85,114 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13850-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13850-6 2025

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Derivation of the Raychaudhuri Equation

    N. Dadhich, “Derivation of the Raychaudhuri Equation”, arXiv:gr-qc/0511123 (2005)https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.gr-qc/0511123

    2005 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Raychaudhuri equations and gravitational collapse in Einstein-Cartan theory

    S. Hensh, S. Liberati, “Raychaudhuri equations and gravitational collapse in Einstein-Cartan theory”, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084073 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084073

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    The Large Scale Structure of Space-time

    S.W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis, “The Large Scale Structure of Space-time” (Cambridge University Press, 1999) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009253161

    1999 doi

  4. [12]

    Classical and quantum analysis of gravitational singularity from Raychaudhuri equation

    M Chakraborty, S Chakraborty, “Classical and quantum analysis of gravitational singularity from Raychaudhuri equation”, Phys. Lett. A, 525, 129883 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129883

    2024

  5. [13]

    Singularities in the universe

    S. W. Hawking, “Singularities in the universe”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 444 (1966) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.17.444

    1966

  6. [14]

    A Positive Mass Theorem Based on the Focusing and Retardation of Null Geodesics

    R. Penrose, R.D. Sorkin, E. Woolgar, “A Positive Mass Theorem Based on the Focusing and Retardation of Null Geodesics”, arXiv e-prints, (1993) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1993gr.qc.....1015P/ arxiv:gr-qc/9301015

    1993 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57

    1965 doi

  8. [16]

    Occurrence of singularities in open universes

    S. W. Hawking, “Occurrence of singularities in open universes”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 689 (1965) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.15.689

    1965 doi

  9. [17]

    Poisson, Relativist’s Toolkit, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511606601

    E. Poisson, Relativist’s Toolkit, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511606601

    2004

  10. [18]

    Reconstruction off (R) gravity models for an accelerated universe using the Raychaudhuri equation

    S. G. Choudhury, et al., “Reconstruction off (R) gravity models for an accelerated universe using the Raychaudhuri equation”, Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 485, 5693. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz731

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Raychaudhuri Equation in K-essence Geometry: Conditional Singular and Non-Singular Cosmolog- ical Models

    S. Das et al., “Raychaudhuri Equation in K-essence Geometry: Conditional Singular and Non-Singular Cosmolog- ical Models”, Fortschr. Phys, 71, 2200193 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202200193

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    The Mystery of the Cosmic Vacuum Energy Density and the Accelerated Expansion of the Universe

    N. Straumann. “The Mystery of the Cosmic Vacuum Energy Density and the Accelerated Expansion of the Universe”. Eur. J. Phys., 20(6):419, (1999) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0143-0807/20/6/ 307. 19

    1999 doi

  13. [21]

    Form Invariance of Raychaudhuri Equation in the Presence of Inflaton-Type Fields

    A. Panda, D. Gangopadhyay, and G. Manna, “ Form Invariance of Raychaudhuri Equation in the Presence of Inflaton-Type Fields”, Fortschr. Phys. 72, 2400134, (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202400134

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    NEC violation in f (R, T) gravity in the context of a non-canonical theory via modified Raychaudhuri equation

    A. Panda, D. Gangopadhyay, and G. Manna, “ NEC violation in f (R, T) gravity in the context of a non-canonical theory via modified Raychaudhuri equation”, Astropart. Phys., 165, 103059, (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.astropartphys.2024.103059

    2025

  15. [23]

    Challenges for ΛCDM: An Update

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara. “Challenges for ΛCDM: An Update”. New Astron. Rev., 95:101659, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659

    2022

  16. [24]

    The Cosmological Constant

    S. M. Carroll. “The Cosmological Constant”. Living Rev. Relativ., 4(1):1–56, (2001) https://doi.org/10.12942% 2Flrr-2001-1

    2001

  17. [25]

    Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Cosmological Constant Problem (but were Afraid to Ask)

    J. Martin. “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Cosmological Constant Problem (but were Afraid to Ask)”. C. R. Phys., 13(6-7):566–665, (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2012.04.008

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    Large extra dimensions from higher-dimensional inflation

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, “Large extra dimensions from higher-dimensional inflation”, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 103508 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103508

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Einstein’s Theory of Gravity and the Problem of Missing Mass

    P.G, Ferreira, G. D. Starkman, “Einstein’s Theory of Gravity and the Problem of Missing Mass”, Sci- ence, 326, 812 (2009) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2009Sci...326..812F/doi:10.1126/ science.1172245

    2009

  20. [28]

    The Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry Problem

    B. A. Robson, “The Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry Problem”, JHEPGC, 4, 1, (2018) https://doi.org/10. 4236/jhepgc.2018.41015

    2018

  21. [29]

    Selected topics in scalar–tensor theories and beyond

    I. Quiros, “Selected topics in scalar–tensor theories and beyond”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 28, 07, 1930012 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827181930012X

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    (39) Now to investigate the cosmological implications of the modified RE (32) in this geometry ( ¯gµν), we have to evaluate ¯R00. The Ricci tensor ( ¯Rµν) in this geometry can be written as, ¯Rµν = ∂ρ ¯Γρ µν − ∂µ ¯Γρ νρ + ¯Γρ ρσ ¯Γσ µν − ¯Γρ µσ ¯Γσ ρν (40) The transformation r...

  23. [31]

    Quantum mechanics of the gravitational field

    C. Teitelboim, “Quantum mechanics of the gravitational field”, Phys. Rev. D , 25, 3159 (1982) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3159

    1982 doi

  24. [32]

    Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?

    S. Shankaranarayanan, J. P. Johnson, “Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 54, 44 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-022-02927-2

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Principle of nongravitating vacuum energy and some of its consequences

    E. I. Guendelman, A. B. Kaganovich, “Principle of nongravitating vacuum energy and some of its consequences”, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7020 (1996) https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.7020

    1996 doi

  26. [34]

    Gravitational theory without the cosmological constant problem

    E. I. Guendelman and A. B. Kaganovich, “Gravitational theory without the cosmological constant problem”, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5970, (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5970

    1997 doi

  27. [35]

    Gravity, Cosmology and Particle Physics without the Cosmological Constant Problem

    E.I. Guendelman, A.B. Kaganovich, “Gravity, Cosmology and Particle Physics without the Cosmological Constant Problem” Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 13, 19, 1583-1586 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732398001662

    1998 doi

  28. [36]

    Scale Invariance, New Inflation and Decaying-terms

    E.I. Guendelman, “Scale Invariance, New Inflation and Decaying-terms”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 14, 16, 1043-1052 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732399001103

    1999 doi

  29. [37]

    Gravitational theory without the cosmological constant problem, symmetries of space-filling branes, and higher dimensions

    E.I. Guendelman, A.B. Kaganovich, “Gravitational theory without the cosmological constant problem, symmetries of space-filling branes, and higher dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 6, 3548 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.56.3548

    1997

  30. [38]

    B. F. Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, Wiley, (1972)

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, Wiley, (1972)

    1972

  32. [40]

    Lecture Notes on General Relativity

    M. Blau, “Lecture Notes on General Relativity”, (2022) http://blau.itp.unibe.ch/GRLecturenotes.html

    2022

  33. [41]

    Curvaton reheating mechanism in a scale invariant two measures theory

    E. I. Guendelman, R. Herrera, “Curvaton reheating mechanism in a scale invariant two measures theory”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 48, 3 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-015-1999-9

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    Instant preheating in a scale invariant two measures theory

    E. I. Guendelman, R. Herrera, P. Labra˜ na, “Instant preheating in a scale invariant two measures theory”, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 123515 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123515

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Unification: Emergent universe followed by inflation and dark epochs from multi-field theory

    E. Guendelman, R. Herrera, “Unification: Emergent universe followed by inflation and dark epochs from multi-field theory”, Ann. Phys., 460, 169566 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2023.169566

    2024

  36. [44]

    S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes, Oxford University Press, New York (1983) https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-mathematical-theory-of-black-holes-9780198503705? cc=us&lang=en&

    1983

  37. [45]

    Cosmology

    S. Weinberg, “Cosmology”, Indian Edition, Oxford University Press, New York (2008) https://global.oup.com/ academic/product/cosmology-9780198526827?cc=in&lang=en&

    2008

  38. [46]

    A New Model for the Expanding Universe

    F. Hoyle, “A New Model for the Expanding Universe”, Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 108, 5, 372-382 (1948) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/108.5.372

    1948 doi

  39. [47]

    The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe

    H. Bondi, T. Gold, “The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe”, Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 108, 3, 252-270 (1948) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/108.3.252

    1948 doi

  40. [48]

    A Quasi–Steady State Cosmological Model with Creation of Matter

    F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge, J. Narlikar, “A Quasi–Steady State Cosmological Model with Creation of Matter”, Astrophys. J., 410, 437 (1993) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1993ApJ...410..437H/doi: 10.1086/172761

    1993 doi

  41. [49]

    Further astrophysical quantities expected in a quasi-steady state Universe

    F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge, J. Narlikar, “Further astrophysical quantities expected in a quasi-steady state Universe”, Astron. Astrophys., 289, 729 (1994) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A%26A...289..729H/abstract

    1994

  42. [50]

    Astrophysical Deductions from the Quasi Steadystate Cosmology

    F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge, J. Narlikar, “Astrophysical Deductions from the Quasi Steadystate Cosmology”, Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 267, 1007 (1994) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1994MNRAS.267.1007H/ doi:10.1093/mnras/267.4.1007

    1994 doi

  43. [51]

    The basic theory underlying the quasi-steady-state cosmology

    F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge, J. Narlikar, “The basic theory underlying the quasi-steady-state cosmology”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 448, 191 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1995.0012

    1995

  44. [52]

    Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge Univer sity Press, Cambridge (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790553

    V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge Univer sity Press, Cambridge (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790553

    2005 doi

  45. [53]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 1993, pp. 396 https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691209814/principles-of-physical-cosmology? srsltid=AfmBOophfTkIO_YHL2J6AidhhZFsSyjEKTymogiBhuBOj4BfWYVhaQFZ

    1993

  46. [54]

    A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000), pp. 49 https://fma.if.usp.br/~mlima/teaching/PGF5292_2021/LiddleLyth_CILSS.pdf

    2000

  47. [55]

    Johann Heinrich Lambert, Mathematician and Scientist,

    J. J. Gray and L. Tiling, “Johann Heinrich Lambert, Mathematician and Scientist,” Historia Mathematica, 5, 7, 13-14 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(78)90133-7 20

    1978 doi

  48. [56]

    On the Lambert W Function

    R. M. Corless et. al., “On the Lambert W Function”, Advances in Computational Mathematics, 5, 1, 329-359 (1996) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02124750

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    Evaporation of Dynamical Horizon with the Hawking Temperature in the K-essence Emergent Vaidya Spacetime

    B. Majumder, S. Ray, and G. Manna, “Evaporation of Dynamical Horizon with the Hawking Temperature in the K-essence Emergent Vaidya Spacetime”, Fortschr. Phys. 71, 2300133, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/prop. 202300133

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    Observational constraints on power-law cosmologies

    M. Kaplinghat et al., “Observational constraints on power-law cosmologies”, Phys. Rev. D 59, 043514 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.043514

    1999 doi

  51. [59]

    Power law cosmology in modified theory with thermodynamics analysis

    J.K. Singh, “Power law cosmology in modified theory with thermodynamics analysis”, Phys. Dark Univ., 46, 101658 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101658

    2024

  52. [60]

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

    A. G. Riess et al., “Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant”, Astron. J., 116, 1009 (1998) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/300499

    1998 doi

  53. [61]

    Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutter et al., “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae”, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  54. [62]

    Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological In- terpretation

    E. Komatsu et al., “Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological In- terpretation”, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/ 192/2/18

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    Planck 2015 results XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity

    Planck Collab. (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Planck 2015 results XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity”, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A14 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525814

    2016 doi

  56. [64]

    Planck 2018 results I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    Planck Collab. (N. Aghanim et al.), “Planck 2018 results I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck”, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A1 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833880

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    Planck 2018 results VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collab. (N. Aghanim et al.), “Planck 2018 results VI. Cosmological parameters”. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2020 doi

  58. [66]

    Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe

    J. Frieman et al., “Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe”, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 46, 385-432 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145243

    2008

  59. [67]

    Adventures in Friedmann cosmology: A detailed expansion of the cosmological Friedmann equations

    R. J. Nemiroff, B. Patla,“Adventures in Friedmann cosmology: A detailed expansion of the cosmological Friedmann equations” Am. J. Phys. 76, 265–276 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2830536

    2008 doi

  60. [68]

    Why the Expansion of the Universe Appears to Accelerate

    P. Smeulders, “Why the Expansion of the Universe Appears to Accelerate”, Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 6 (2013) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.46107

    2013

  61. [69]

    Brans-Dicke theory as a unified model for dark matter-dark energy

    H. Kim, “Brans-Dicke theory as a unified model for dark matter-dark energy”, Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc., 364, 3, 813–822 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09593.x

    2005

  62. [70]

    Focusing of geodesic congruences in an accelerated expanding Universe

    F.D. Albareti et al., “Focusing of geodesic congruences in an accelerated expanding Universe”, JCAP, 12, 020 (2012) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/020

    2012 doi

  63. [71]

    Quantum Raychaudhuri equation

    S. Das, “Quantum Raychaudhuri equation”, Phys. Rev. D89, 084068 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 89.084068

    2014 doi

  64. [72]

    New class of inhomogeneous cosmological perfect-fluid solutions without big-bang singular- ity

    Jose M.M. Senovilla, “New class of inhomogeneous cosmological perfect-fluid solutions without big-bang singular- ity”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 2219-2221, (1990) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2219

    1990 doi

  65. [73]

    Singularity Theorems and Their Consequences

    Jose M.M. Senovilla, “Singularity Theorems and Their Consequences”, Gen. Rel. Grav., 30, 701-848 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018801101244

    1998 doi

  66. [74]

    Another gravitational solution found

    John Maddox, “Another gravitational solution found”, Nature 345, 201, (1990) https://doi.org/10.1038/ 345201a0

    1990

  67. [75]

    Accelerated motion in general relativity: fate of the singularity

    I. Bhattacharyya and S. Ray, “Accelerated motion in general relativity: fate of the singularity”, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 953 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10876-y

    2022 doi

  68. [76]

    Self-similar collapse and the Raychaudhuri equation

    S. G. Choudhury et al., “Self-similar collapse and the Raychaudhuri equation”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1027 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7559-9

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.