Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 45 references

Nested Stochastic Resetting: Nonequilibrium Steady-states and Exact Correlations

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A one-way chain of diffusive particles that reset to their predecessor has exactly solvable steady-state correlations, obtained by mapping each correlation to the first-meeting probability of two random walkers.

desk verdict Exact steady-state correlations for a nested resetting chain, with one asserted lemma that is true but unproved—worth reviewing and accepting after a minor revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03225 v1 pith:LETC2BND submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.stat-mech

Henry Alston , Callum Britton , Thibault Bertrand This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords nestedstochasticresettingnonequilibriumsteadystatesexacttwo-pointcorrelationscountingprocessesdiscrete-timerandomwalkBrownianparticleslossyinformationpropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces and solves a many-particle model in which each diffusive particle resets, at random times, to the instantaneous position of its predecessor on a chain, with the first particle resetting to a fixed distribution. The authors derive exact steady-state distributions and all even moments of every particle, and they claim the two-point correlations $\langle x_n x_{n+j}\rangle$ between arbitrary particles are exactly computable. The central step is to rewrite each particle's position as a purely diffusive trajectory tagged by a counting process, so that a correlation between two particles is controlled by the last time their counting indices coincide. That coincidence probability is computed through a discrete-time random walk in which two walkers step left with equal probability until they first meet. This makes the model a rare exactly solvable example of long-range correlations in a many-body nonequilibrium steady state.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the diffusive-trajectory representation: at late time $T$, $x_n(T)$ is viewed as the endpoint of a single Brownian path $\chi(t)$ that is carried through the chain by resetting events, with an integer-valued counting process $\eta(t)$ recording which particle currently carries it. The correlation between $x_n$ and $x_{n+j}$ is then determined by the last time $t_\ell$ before $T$ at which their two counting processes are equal; at that instant the two particles share a common position, and afterward their diffusive motions are independent, so $\langle x_n x_{n+j}\rangle$ reduces to the variance of that shared position. The probability that the shared level is $m$ becomes a first-meeting probability for a discrete-time random walk: two walkers start at sites $n$ and $n+j$, and each step moves one of them left with probability $1/2$ until the right walker first lands on the left walker's site. These probabilities are given recursively using the binomial weights $B(m,n)=2^{-n}\binom{n}{m}$, which is what turns the correlator into a weighted sum of single-particle variances.

What would settle it

Simulate the microscopic process with $P_0(x)=\delta(x)$ for a separation large enough that the last-renewal method is impractical (for example $n=10$, $j=10$), measure $\langle x_n x_{n+j}\rangle$, and compare with Eq. (14) using the coefficients from Eq. (16). A systematic mismatch growing with simulation time would falsify the exact-correlation claim; agreement at small $n$ and $j$ has already been shown, so the informative test is at large $n$ and $j$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that nested stochastic resetting, a one-way chain of diffusion processes where $x_n$ resets to $x_{n-1}$ and $x_1$ resets to $P_0$, is exactly solvable in the steady state. The stationary distribution $P_n^*(x)$ is the convolution of $P_0$ with a modified Bessel kernel of order $n-1/2$, and the $2q$-th moment is $\langle x_n^{2q}\rangle = \binom{n+q-1}{n-1} (2q)!/\alpha^{2q}$; in particular the variance grows linearly with chain position, $\langle x_n^2\rangle = 2n/\alpha^2 = n\langle x_1^2\rangle$. The paper's main new result is the exact two-point correlator $\langle x_n x_{n+j}\rangle = \sum_{m=1}^n \alpha^{n,n+j}_m \langle x_m^2\rangle$, where $\alpha^{n,n+j}_m$ is the probability that two counting processes, one ending at $n$ and one at $n+j$, are first equal at level $m$. These probabilities are evaluated in closed form through a binomial recursion, giving exact correlations for arbitrary separations and showing that the rescaled correlation decays exponentially in $j$ with a correlation length that grows with $n$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the claim that once the two reconstructed processes are found at the same chain position at the same time, all earlier resetting events behind them are synchronized so that the two trajectories are identical from then on; the correlation formula is built on this unproved step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each particle's steady-state variance is $n$ times the first particle's, so fluctuations grow linearly along the chain even though particles never interact directly except through resetting.
  • The excess kurtosis is exactly $3/n$, meaning the stationary distributions interpolate from double-exponential for $n=1$ to Gaussian as $n$ grows.
  • The rescaled correlation $C_{n,n+j}$ decays exponentially in $j$ for large $j$, and the correlation length $\xi_n$ increases with $n$: deeper into the chain, particles are correlated over longer separations.
  • Equation (14) with Eq. (16) gives a fully analytic route to arbitrary two-point correlations, avoiding the computationally arduous last-renewal integrals.
  • Because $\langle x_n x_{n+j}\rangle$ is a convex combination of one-particle variances, all two-point correlations are determined by single-particle steady-state statistics plus the counting-process meeting probabilities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same first-meeting coefficients should govern higher-order and multi-time correlations, because the collapse of a correlator to the variance at the last coincidence time does not obviously stop at second order; this yields a testable family of exact relations beyond those stated in the paper.
  • Read as a word-of-mouth model, the results imply that each retelling adds the same amount of noise, so a message's variance grows linearly with retellings while the correlation between two copies decays exponentially with their separation, a quantitative baseline for information-loss models that the paper only gestures at.
  • A natural extension, not pursued here, is to give each particle its own resetting rate or diffusion coefficient; the trajectory and counting-process construction should survive, producing generalized coefficient recursions that could be checked numerically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a one-dimensional chain of Brownian particles with nested stochastic resetting: each particle x_n resets at rate r to the instantaneous position of x_{n-1}, while x_1 resets to a fixed distribution P_0. The authors derive the steady-state Fokker-Planck hierarchy and obtain closed-form stationary distributions, Eq. (6), and even moments, Eq. (8), including the simple variance law <x_n^2> = 2nD/r and excess kurtosis 3/n. The main result is an exact formula for steady-state two-point correlators <x_n x_{n+j}>, Eq. (14), expressed as a weighted sum of single-particle variances, with weights given by a discrete-time random walk first-meeting probability, Eq. (16). The derivation is based on reconstructing each particle's position as a purely diffusive trajectory with a counting index process eta(t). The exact results are compared with numerical simulations and with a last-renewal calculation for small n and j.

Significance. If correct, the correlation formula provides a rare exactly solvable example of spatial correlations in a many-body nonequilibrium steady state with broken detailed balance. The derivation is self-contained and parameter-free: the model is defined first, all formulas follow from the Fokker-Planck hierarchy or from the combinatorial ordering of reset events, and no fitted constants enter. The paper also provides explicit checks: the stationary distributions and moments are verified numerically, and the correlator formula is cross-checked against a last-renewal computation for small (n,j). These strengths make the manuscript a valuable contribution to the stochastic-resetting literature. The remaining issue is a rigor gap in the derivation of Eq. (14), not a demonstrated error in the formula itself.

major comments (2)
  1. [Static two-point correlation functions (main text; Supplement Sec. IV)] The derivation of Eq. (14) rests on the assertion, made just before Eq. (14), that if eta(t)=bar-eta(t)=m at some time t<T, then the two reconstructed diffusive processes are identical for all t'<=t. This synchronization statement is load-bearing: it is what justifies writing <x_n x_{n+j}> = <Upsilon^2> and then replacing <Upsilon^2> by a weighted sum of <x_m^2>. The statement is not proved in the main text or in the supplement. It is true (one can prove by backward induction that t_k = bar-t_k for all k<=m), but a written lemma with a proof is needed. The small-n last-renewal checks in the supplement, Eqs. (S37)-(S46), support the final formula but do not supply the general argument.
  2. [Static two-point correlation functions (definition of t_l)] The quantity t_l is defined as the last time before T with eta(t_l)=bar-eta(t_l), but the last meeting in value can occur at a reset instant at which the right-continuous indices differ: one index jumps at that instant while the reconstructed positions agree. The definition should be stated in terms of left limits, or t_l should be defined as the last time at which chi(t)=bar-chi(t). This is not a cosmetic point, since it is exactly the step at which Upsilon is identified with x_m(t_l) and the coefficients alpha_m^{n,n+j} are introduced.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Discussion and Fig. 3] The statements that C_{n,n+j} decays exponentially for large j and that the correlation length xi_n increases with n are presented as results, but they are supported only by numerical fitting of the analytic curves; no closed-form expression or proof for xi_n is given. Please label these as numerical observations or add a derivation.
  2. [Supplement Eq. (S35)] The last-renewal equation for the joint distribution appears to contain a typo: the first term is written as e^{-rt}G_0(x_n,t|x_n(0)) P_n({x_i},t|{x_i(0)}), which is self-referential and has an extra brace; it should presumably involve P_{n-1}. Please correct this equation.
  3. [Main text after Eq. (12)] The symbols N and \bar{N} used to refer to the jumping events are not defined in the main text; the discussion should refer to eta and \bar{eta} or explicitly define N.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model is defined first and all stated results follow from explicit derivation, with no fitted parameter or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper defines the nested resetting process through a clear microscopic rule and Fokker–Planck equation (Eq. 1), then derives the steady-state distributions (Eqs. 4–6), moments (Eq. 8), and correlations (Eqs. 14–16) directly from that definition. No parameter is fitted to data and no result is imported from the authors' prior work as an unverified premise; the cited works of the same group (Refs. [23] and [38]) are contextual and not used to establish the main equations. The correlation result Eq. (14) is derived by a mapping to counting processes and then independently checked by the last-renewal calculations in the Supplemental Material (Eqs. S37–S46) and by numerical simulation. The only notable gap is the synchronization assertion that if two reconstructed index processes are equal at some time, the reconstructed diffusive trajectories are identical for all earlier times; this is stated without a written proof in the main text, but it is a rigor gap rather than a circularity, because it is not equivalent to the correlation formula and is in fact provable from the unique-last-reset construction. The derivation is self-contained and the main results do not reduce to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is defined by the resetting rules with physical inputs D, r, and P0; no free parameters are fitted. The main derivations rely on standard integral identities, the memoryless property of Poisson processes, and a combinatorial DTRW mapping whose subtlest step is the synchronization claim. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Each particle undergoes independent Brownian motion with diffusion D and Poissonian resetting at rate r; on reset, x_n takes the instantaneous value of x_{n-1}.
    This defines the model; the Fokker-Planck hierarchy (Eq. 1) follows from it.
  • domain assumption The system reaches a unique nonequilibrium steady state as t tends to infinity for each fixed n.
    The paper solves the stationary Fokker-Planck equation and uses large-T limits; positive recurrence of the finite chain makes this plausible but it is not proved.
  • standard math The backward recurrence times τ_n (times since last resets) are independent Exp(r) variables, allowing iteration down the chain.
    Uses the memoryless property and independence of the Poisson resetting processes; invoked to construct χ(t) and in the DTRW mapping.
  • standard math The integral identities for modified Bessel functions used to invert the Fourier transforms (Eq. S5, S8).
    Taken from Bateman tables; not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The order of the backward reset times can be represented by a DTRW in which at each step one of the two index processes decreases by one with equal probability.
    This is the key combinatorial mapping; it follows from identical independent Poisson rates but the equivalence is argued rather than proved in full.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nested Stochastic Resetting: Nonequilibrium Steady-states and Exact Correlations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LETC2BND

@misc{pith2026250203225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nested Stochastic Resetting: Nonequilibrium Steady-states and Exact Correlations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LETC2BND}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03225}
}
abstract

Stochastic resetting breaks detailed balance and drives the formation of nonequilibrium steady states . Here, we consider a chain of diffusive processes $x_i(t)$ that interact unilaterally: at random time intervals, the process $x_n$ stochastically resets to the instantaneous value of $x_{n-1}$. We derive analytically the steady-state statistics of these nested stochastic resetting processes including the stationary distribution for each process as well as its moments. We are also able to calculate exactly the steady-state two-point correlations $\langle x_n x_{n+j}\rangle$ between processes by mapping the problem to one of the ordering statistics of random counting processes. Understanding statistics and correlations in many-particle nonequilibrium systems remains a formidable challenge and our results provide an example of such tractable correlations. We expect this framework will both help build a model-independent framework for random processes with unilateral interactions and find immediate applications, e.g. in the modelling of lossy information propagation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03225 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar, Diffusion with Stochastic Resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 160601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Stochastic resetting and applications, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical 53, 193001 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar, Diffusion with opti- mal resetting, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44, 435001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Eule and J

    S. Eule and J. J. Metzger, Non-equilibrium steady states of stochastic processes with intermittent resetting, New Journal of Physics 18, 033006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    V. m. c. M´ endez and D. Campos, Characterization of sta- tionary states in random walks with stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. E 93, 022106 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    C. D. Bello, A. K. Hartmann, S. N. Majumdar, F. Mori, A. Rosso, and G. Schehr, Current fluc- tuations in stochastically resetting particle systems, arXiv:2302.06696 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Roberts, E

    C. Roberts, E. Sezik, and E. Lardet, Ratchet-mediated resetting: current, efficiency, and exact solution, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57, 325001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Condamin, O

    S. Condamin, O. B´ enichou, V. Tejedor, R. Voituriez, and J. Klafter, First-passage times in complex scale-invariant media, Nature 450, 77 (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    B´ enichou, M

    O. B´ enichou, M. Coppey, M. Moreau, P.-H. Suet, and R. Voituriez, Optimal search strategies for hidden tar- gets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 198101 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    S. N. Majumdar, F. Mori, H. Schawe, and G. Schehr, Mean perimeter and area of the convex hull of a planar brownian motion in the presence of resetting, Phys. Rev. E 103, 022135 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    De Bruyne, S

    B. De Bruyne, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Op- timal resetting brownian bridges via enhanced fluctua- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 200603 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Redner, A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)

    S. Redner, A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    Janson and Y

    S. Janson and Y. Peres, Hitting times for random walks with restarts, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 26, 537 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Reuveni, Optimal stochastic restart renders fluctua- tions in first passage times universal, Phys

    S. Reuveni, Optimal stochastic restart renders fluctua- tions in first passage times universal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 170601 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Pal and S

    A. Pal and S. Reuveni, First passage under restart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030603 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, and K. Mallick, Optimal diffusive search: nonequilibrium resetting versus equilib- rium dynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 46, 185001 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    A. J. Bray, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Persistence and first-passage properties in nonequilibrium systems, Advances in Physics 62, 225 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Faisant, B

    F. Faisant, B. Besga, A. Petrosyan, S. Ciliberto, and S. N. Majumdar, Optimal mean first-passage time of a brownian searcher with resetting in one and two dimen- sions: experiments, theory and numerical tests, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2021, 11320...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Besga, A

    B. Besga, A. Bovon, A. Petrosyan, S. N. Majumdar, and S. Ciliberto, Optimal mean first-passage time for a brow- nian searcher subjected to resetting: Experimental and theoretical results, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032029 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    B´ enichou, Y

    O. B´ enichou, Y. Kafri, M. Sheinman, and R. Voituriez, Searching fast for a target on dna without falling to traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 138102 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    B´ enichou, C

    O. B´ enichou, C. Loverdo, M. Moreau, and R. Voituriez, Intermittent search strategies, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 81 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    P. C. Bressloff, Modeling active cellular transport as a directed search process with stochastic resetting and de- lays, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 355001 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Alston and T

    H. Alston and T. Bertrand, Boosting macroscopic diffu- sion with local resetting, arXiv:2401.12772 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Biroli, H

    M. Biroli, H. Larralde, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Extreme statistics and spacing distribution in a brownian gas correlated by resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 207101 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Nagar and S

    A. Nagar and S. Gupta, Stochastic resetting in inter- acting particle systems: a review, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 56, 283001 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    F. J. Meigel and S. Rulands, Localisation phase transition in cooperative stochastic resetting (2023), arXiv:2312.09307 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P. C. Bressloff, Global density equations for a popula- tion of actively switching particles, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57, 085001 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Bateman, Tables of integral transforms : based, in part, on notes left by Harry Bateman

    H. Bateman, Tables of integral transforms : based, in part, on notes left by Harry Bateman. Volume II (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954)

    1954

  21. [29]

    See Supplemental Material at [] for further analytical and computational details, which includes Refs. []

  22. [30]

    Hansen, The three extreme value distributions: An introductory review, Frontiers in Physics 8, 10.3389/fphy.2020.604053 (2020)

    A. Hansen, The three extreme value distributions: An introductory review, Frontiers in Physics 8, 10.3389/fphy.2020.604053 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    S. N. Majumdar, A. Pal, and G. Schehr, Extreme value statistics of correlated random variables: a pedagogical review, Physics Reports 840, 1 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Kurchan, Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dynam- ics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 31, 3719 (1998)

    J. Kurchan, Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dynam- ics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 31, 3719 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Gaspard, Time-Reversed Dynamical Entropy and Ir- reversibility in Markovian Random Processes, Journal of Statistical Physics 117, 599 (2004)

    P. Gaspard, Time-Reversed Dynamical Entropy and Ir- reversibility in Markovian Random Processes, Journal of Statistical Physics 117, 599 (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    Peliti and S

    L. Peliti and S. Pigolotti, Stochastic Thermodynamics: An Introduction (Princeton University Press, 2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Pruessner and R

    G. Pruessner and R. Garcia-Millan, Field theories of active particle systems and their entropy production, arXiv:2211.11906 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cocconi, R

    L. Cocconi, R. Garcia-Millan, Z. Zhen, B. Buturca, and G. Pruessner, Entropy Production in Exactly Solvable Systems, Entropy 22, 1252 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    F. Mori, K. S. Olsen, and S. Krishnamurthy, Entropy pro- duction of resetting processes, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023103 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Nested Stochastic Resetting: Nonequilibrium Steady-states and Exact Correlations

    H. Alston, L. Cocconi, and T. Bertrand, Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of diffusion in fluctuating potentials, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55, 274004 (2022). Supplemental Material for “Nested Stochastic Resetting: Nonequilibrium Steady-states and Exact C...

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The two walkers have met for the first time at site n− 1, which occurs with probability αn,n+j n−1 (by definition)

  32. [40]

    The two walkers met first at site n (with probabilityαn,n+j n ) and then have each taken one step in the following two events (with probabilityB(1, 2)). Equating the three probabilities, we derive a closed form equation for αn,n+j n−1 : αn,n+j n−1 =B(j + 1,j + 2)−αn,n+j n B(1,...

  33. [41]

    Calculation of ⟨x3x2⟩ and⟨x3x1⟩ In this subsection, we calculate ⟨x3x2⟩ and⟨x3x1⟩, both of which can be calculated from the 3 particle joint-pdf

    (S39) B. Calculation of ⟨x3x2⟩ and⟨x3x1⟩ In this subsection, we calculate ⟨x3x2⟩ and⟨x3x1⟩, both of which can be calculated from the 3 particle joint-pdf. We find ⟨x3x2⟩ = ∫+∞ −∞ dx1dx2dx3x3x2P∗ 3 (x1,x 2,x 3) = ∫+∞ −∞ d˜x1d˜x2 ∫+∞ 0 dτ [re−2rτ ˜x2 2 +r2τe−2rτ ˜x1˜x2]P∗ 2 (˜x1...

  34. [42]

    Bateman and Bateman Manuscript Project, Tables of integral transforms, Vol

    H. Bateman and Bateman Manuscript Project, Tables of integral transforms, Vol. I (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954). 9

    1954

  35. [43]

    Bateman and Bateman Manuscript Project, Tables of integral transforms, Vol

    H. Bateman and Bateman Manuscript Project, Tables of integral transforms, Vol. II (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954)

    1954

  36. [44]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Stochastic resetting and applications, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 193001 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    I. S. Gradshtyn, I. M. Ryzhik, D. Zwillinger, and V. Moll, Table of integrals, series, and products , 8th ed. (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.