REVIEW 1 cited by
Rapid Mass Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Coalescences Using Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning can be used to drastically decrease the processing time of parameter estimation for coalescing binaries of compact objects including black holes and neutron stars detected in gravitational waves (GWs). As a first step, we present two neural network models trained to rapidly estimate the posterior distributions of the chirp mass and mass ratio of a detected binary black hole system from the GW strain data of LIGO Hanford and Livingston Observatories. Using these parameters the component masses can be predicted, which has implications for the prediction of the likelihood that a merger contains a neutron star. The results are compared to the 'gold standard' of parameter estimation of gravitational waves used by the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration (LVC), LALInference. Our models predict posterior distributions consistent with that from LALInference while using orders of magnitude less processing time once the models are trained. The median predictions are within the 90% credible intervals of LALInference for all predicted parameters when tested on real binary black hole events detected during the LVC's first and second observing runs. We argue that deep learning has strong potential for low-latency high-accuracy parameter estimation suitable for real-time GW search pipelines.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Robustness of Sensitivity Evaluations for Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms
AresGW model 1's injection detection count at a false-alarm rate of 1/month varies with noise dataset by up to 39% coefficient of variation, while sensitive distance varies by only a few percent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.