Environment-Aware Channel Measurement and Modeling for Terahertz Monostatic Sensing

Chong Han; Henk Wymeersch; Yejian Lyu; Zhiqiang Yuan

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 41 references

Environment-Aware Channel Measurement and Modeling for Terahertz Monostatic Sensing

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that 300 GHz monostatic sensing channels carry enough information to infer room structure, surface roughness, and material type.

desk verdict Valuable THz monostatic dataset and material reflection-loss models, but the 'reliably extract physical characteristics' claim outruns the evidence; needs a validation pass and a toned-down abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02088 v1 pith:LICVMRTO submitted 2025-09-02 eess.SP

Yejian Lyu , Zhiqiang Yuan , Henk Wymeersch , Chong Han This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SP

keywords terahertzmonostaticsensingISACchannelmeasurementenvironment-awaremodelingmultipathclusteringreflectionlossLambertianscattering

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a 300 GHz monostatic sensing measurement campaign across 57 co-located transceiver positions in three indoor environments, and proposes an environment-aware channel model that ties physical scene attributes to channel observables. Using a SAGE algorithm to extract multipath components and an image-processing clustering method to group them, the authors show that cluster counts, intra-cluster delay and angular spreads, Lambertian scattering slopes, and reflection-loss distributions vary systematically with reflector quantity, surface roughness, geometry, and material type. The central claim is that physical characteristics—such as structural layout, roughness class, and material identity—can be read from observed channel characteristics alone. If true, this gives terahertz ISAC systems a path from raw channel measurements to environmental understanding without requiring separate sensors.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument is the measurement-plus-clustering pipeline and the mapping table built on it. A 290-310 GHz VNA-based channel sounder with rotating 8-degree horn antennas collects directional channel frequency responses at 57 positions. A trajectory-tracking SAGE algorithm de-embeds the antenna pattern and estimates each multipath component's amplitude, delay, and azimuth angle. Connected component labeling, applied to a thresholded power-angle-delay image after morphological closing, groups these MPCs into delay-angle clusters. From these clusters the framework reads physical attributes: cluster count for reflectors, diffuse MPC statistics and Lambertian slope for r

What would settle it

Use a surface profilometer to measure the RMS height σ of the polymer, cement, and tile surfaces, then test whether the number of diffuse MPCs, the angular span, and the fitted Lambertian slope nLam change monotonically with σ when the material type is held fixed. If the ordering reverses or disappears—or if σ is nearly identical across the three surfaces—the Level-2 roughness inference collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is a four-level environment-aware mapping for 300 GHz monostatic sensing. At Level 1, the number of MPC clusters and their delay-angle centroids reveal reflector quantity and location. At Level 2, the number of diffuse MPCs within a cluster, the angular span they cover, and the fitted slope of a Lambertian cos^2(Δθ) power model indicate surface roughness: rougher surfaces scatter more diffuse energy over wider angles and yield smaller Lambertian slopes. At Level 3, cluster shape and intra-cluster delay and angular dispersion distinguish flat walls, concave corners, convex corners, and cylindrical pillars, demonstrated by structural-model matching that reconstructs the meas

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that surface roughness is correctly ordered by visual inspection and construction standards (polymer roughest, then cement, then tile) and that this ordering, rather than material composition or construction differences, drives the observed differences in diffuse MPC count, angular span, and Lambertian slope.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A THz ISAC node could localize and count dominant reflectors from the number and delay-angle centroids of MPC clusters, without a separate mapping pass.
Surface roughness classes can be assigned from diffuse MPC count and Lambertian slope, enabling scattering-aware channel simulation from simple wall categories.
Reflector geometry (flat wall, concave corner, convex corner, cylinder) is distinguishable from the spatial pattern of a single cluster, so layout reconstruction can be driven by the channel itself.
Material identification becomes statistical: normal models for specular reflection loss and Weibull models for diffuse reflection loss give class-separable features for metal, glass, cement, tile, and polymer.
The fitted cluster-level distributions can seed network-level simulations of monostatic sensing performance, linking physical environment models to ISAC link budgets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The fixed 1.2 m TRx-wall distance means the reflection-loss separation is demonstrated under controlled geometry; a direct extension is to sweep distance and verify that calibrated reflection loss remains material-discriminative, which the paper flags as future work.
The ordinal roughness ranking (polymer rougher than cement rougher than tile), based on visual and construction standards, could be promoted to a quantitative estimator by regressing measured RMS height against Lambertian slope and diffuse MPC count; this would test whether the trend is monotonic in σ and not merely material-correlated.
Because specular and diffuse reflection-loss distributions are fitted by different families (normal vs Weibull), a generative classifier could invert them to posterior material probabilities; the paper leaves confusion-matrix analysis for future work.
The image-processing clustering step suggests a bridge to learned segmentation: if CCL labels are treated as pseudo-labels, a neural network could be trained to map raw power-angle-delay images to cluster regions, potentially generalizing beyond the fixed distance and manual threshold.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

I read the 300 GHz monostatic sensing paper. The real contribution is the measurement campaign: 57 TRx positions across three indoor scenarios, with careful SAGE/CCL processing and cluster-level statistics. The material-wise specular and diffuse reflection-loss models are genuinely new relative to the authors' earlier work [19], [20], and the fits to normal/Weibull distributions look credible. The comparison of specular loss against the reference database in [20] gives an external anchor that the numbers are not arbitrary.

The soft spot is the abstract and conclusion claim that the approach can "reliably extract physical characteristics." That is not established. Every material label is assigned using known geometry and specular reflection loss, and the same reflection-loss metric is then proposed as the material observable. There are no held-out TRx positions, no classification accuracy, and no confusion matrix. The paper itself defers that to future work, so as written the framework is descriptive rather than a validated estimator. The roughness ordering is based on visual inspection and construction standards, not measured RMS height; Eq. (13) is never evaluated, so the polymer→cement→tile trend is plausible but could be confounded by material composition. Also, Section IV-B contains a self-contradictory sentence about TRxs 37-45 that needs a copyedit.

These issues are addressable, and the paper is honest about the roughness limitation. The measurements seem real, the cluster statistics are internally consistent, and the modeling follows established practice. What I'd want in revision is either a held-out validation or a claim scaled back to "consistent with material-dependent reflection behavior." I would not desk-reject this. It deserves a serious referee, with realistic expectation of major revision.

I'd cite it for the dataset and the material-specific reflection-loss models, if I worked in THz sensing. For a reading group, maybe—useful for the THz/ISAC subfield, not a general audience. No code or data release is mentioned, which limits reproducibility, so I'd ask for that too.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper reports a 300 GHz monostatic sensing channel measurement campaign at 57 co-located TRx positions across three indoor scenarios. Multipath components are extracted with a SAGE algorithm and clustered using connected-component labeling on delay-angle power profiles. The authors propose an environment-aware channel modeling framework that maps physical scene attributes (reflector count/location, surface roughness, reflector geometry, material type) to channel observables such as cluster counts, intra-cluster delay/angular spreads, reflection-loss distributions, and Lambertian scattering parameters. Statistical fits are provided for cluster counts, delay/angular spreads, and reflection losses. The paper claims that the proposed approach can reliably extract physical characteristics from channel observations.

Significance. If the central claim were supported, this would be a useful contribution to THz ISAC channel modeling: the measurement campaign is substantial, the cluster-level statistical characterization goes beyond prior TRx-averaged metrics, and the explicit hierarchical mapping between physical attributes and propagation observables is well organized. The paper also contains useful external anchors, such as comparing specular reflection losses with a material reflection-loss database in [20]. However, the advertised inference capability is not validated with out-of-sample tests, and the roughness and material mappings rest on partially circular or unmeasured inputs. The framework is currently a descriptive statistical characterization rather than a validated physical-attribute estimator.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and Section V-C] The central claim that the approach can 'reliably extract physical characteristics' is not supported by an inference test. Physical labels for clusters are assigned using the known measurement geometry and, for materials, specular reflection loss (Section V-B.2 and V-C). The statistical models are then fitted to the same labeled data. No held-out TRx positions, cross-validation, classification accuracy, or confusion matrix are reported; in fact, Section V-C states that confusion-matrix analysis is left for future exploration. Thus the evidence supports a descriptive mapping, not a validated estimator. Please either add a validation experiment (e.g., train on a subset of TRx positions and test on the rest, or classify unlabeled clusters) or explicitly soften the abstract/conclusion claims from 'reliably extract/infer' to 'characterize and model.'
[Section V-A, Eq. (13), Figs. 8-9] The Level-2 surface-roughness inference is based on a visual ranking of polymer, cement, and tile surfaces ('visual inspection and construction standards'), while the RMS height sigma defined in Eq. (13) is never measured or evaluated. Because material composition and finish differ across the three surfaces, the observed monotonic trends in diffuse MPC count, angular span, and Lambertian slope could be confounded by material properties rather than driven by roughness. This undermines the roughness-to-channel mapping claimed in Table III. Please either measure sigma (or an independent roughness metric) for the actual surfaces, or test surfaces of the same material with controlled roughness to support the claimed trend.
[Sections V-B.2 and V-C, Fig. 14] There is a circularity concern in the material-identification claim. The clusters associated with each material are identified 'based on scenario geometry and specular reflection loss' (Section V-B.2) and by correlating with the known geometric layout (Section V-C). The same reflection-loss distributions are then proposed as the material fingerprint (Fig. 14). While the comparison with the material reflection-loss database in [20] provides an external anchor for mean specular loss, it does not validate the discrimination capability of the proposed features on unlabeled data. The authors should either use an independent labeling procedure (e.g., known material panels placed in the scene) or perform a separability/classification test on clusters whose material is not used during model fitting.

minor comments (3)

[Section IV-B] The text states 'Scenario 1 and TRxs 37-45 exhibit a similar number of MPC clusters. TRxs 37-45 is shown to have a higher number of clusters compared to those in Scenario 1 and TRxs 37-45.' This is internally inconsistent; the second sentence presumably refers to TRxs 46-57.
[Eq. (13)] The RMS height sigma is defined but never used in the subsequent analysis. If it is intended as a conceptual definition, state this explicitly in the main text; otherwise provide measurements for the surfaces studied.
[Fig. 9] The Lambertian fits report slope and intercept to two decimals without confidence intervals or goodness-of-fit metrics. Adding R^2 or RMSE for each fit would strengthen the claimed monotonic trend in n_Lam.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the environment-aware mapping is an empirical characterization; the main weakness is missing held-out inference tests, not a reduction of results to inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The channel observables (SAGE-extracted MPCs, CCL clusters, reflection-loss distributions, Lambertian fits) are computed directly from measurements, and the physical labels (material, geometry, roughness ordering) come from the known measurement layout and visual/construction-based inspection, not from the model's own outputs. The reflection-loss material analysis in Section V-C explicitly states that clusters are labeled 'by correlating their parameters with the known geometric layout of the measurement scenarios,' so the reported material-specific loss distributions are not constructed from the same metric being validated. The Lambertian slope fits in Section V-A are descriptive regressions of diffuse power versus cos^2(Δθ) on three surfaces; they are not used as a predictor and then validated on held-out roughness classes, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction loop. Self-citations to [19] and [20] provide the SAGE algorithm, scenario details, and a reflection-loss reference database; these are methodological provenance and consistency checks, and the paper's own measurements independently generate the reported trends. The paper candidly notes validation gaps: it says 'surface roughness classification in this study is primarily based on empirical observations rather than precise surface measurements' (Section V-A) and 'A confusion-matrix-based analysis for more materials would be valuable for quantifying classification performance, which we leave for future exploration' (Section V-C). These gaps mean the abstract's 'reliably extract' claim is not yet fully substantiated, but that is a missing-validation weakness, not circularity: the mappings are empirical correlations, not identities forced by definition or by self-citation. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 18 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a large number of fitted statistical parameters and on labeling and roughness assumptions that are not independently measured. No new physical entities are introduced; the environment-aware framework is a taxonomy of mappings, not a new particle, force, or conserved quantity.

free parameters (18)

Signal threshold T (PADP binarization) = 10 dB above noise floor
Sets which delay-angle pixels count as signal; controls cluster shapes and counts (Section III-B).
Morphological structuring element K = not reported
Dilation/erosion connectivity in Eq. 6; size and shape affect cluster merging, but value is not given.
Minimum cluster size Nmin = not reported
Pixels threshold discards small regions; not specified in Section III-B.
Specular/diffuse reflection-loss threshold = not reported
Chosen from empirical reflection-loss distribution (Section IV-A); no numerical value given.
Number-of-clusters distribution parameters, Scenario 1 = N(36.01, 10.23)
Fitted normal for CDF in Fig. 4.
Number-of-clusters distribution parameters, Scenario 2 = N(85, 42)
Fitted normal for CDF in Fig. 4.
Number-of-clusters distribution parameters, TRx 37-45 = N(54.89, 24.36)
Fitted normal for CDF in Fig. 4.
Number-of-clusters distribution parameters, TRx 46-57 = N(38.25, 44.93)
Fitted normal for CDF in Fig. 4.
Log delay-depth normal parameters (four cases) = means/variances not enumerated
Fitted to CDFs in Fig. 5(a); used to characterize cluster temporal extent.
Log angular-width normal parameters (four cases) = not enumerated
Fitted to CDFs in Fig. 5(b).
Log intra-cluster delay-spread normal parameters (four cases) = not enumerated
Fitted to CDFs in Fig. 6(a).
Log intra-cluster angular-spread normal parameters (four cases) = not enumerated
Fitted to CDFs in Fig. 6(b).
Material-specific intra-cluster spread normal parameters = not enumerated
Fitted for cement, glass, and metal in Scenario 1 (Fig. 13).
Lambertian slope and intercept, polymer = nLam=10.29, bLam=-26.98 dB
Fit to normalized diffuse power vs cos^2(delta theta) in Fig. 9(a).
Lambertian slope and intercept, cement = nLam=18.30, bLam=-32.07 dB
Fit in Fig. 9(b).
Lambertian slope and intercept, tile = nLam=24.09, bLam=-45.01 dB
Fit in Fig. 9(c).
Specular reflection-loss normal parameters per material = means/variances not enumerated
Fitted CDFs in Fig. 14(a) for five materials; basis for material inference.
Diffuse reflection-loss Weibull parameters per material = shapes/scales not enumerated
Fitted CDFs in Fig. 14(b); basis for material inference.

assumptions (9)

standard math IDFT, morphological closing, and connected component labeling correctly segment delay-angle signal regions.
Section III-B applies standard image-processing operations; their correctness as clustering tools is assumed.
standard math SAGE with trajectory tracking accurately estimates MPC amplitude, delay, and angle under the signal model in Eqs. (1)-(2).
Section III-A; algorithm from [19], convergence and unbiasedness not re-derived.
domain assumption Monostatic Tx/Rx share the same azimuth angle for each path, so departure equals arrival.
Eqs. (1)-(2); valid for co-located antennas but ignores antenna phase-center offset effects beyond the rotation manifold.
domain assumption Each delay-angle cluster corresponds to a coherent reflection group from one or a few local reflectors.
Section IV preamble; this grounds the mapping from clusters to physical objects.
domain assumption Lambertian cos^2 scattering model (Eq. 14) describes the diffuse power angular falloff of THz reflections.
Section V-A; no physical derivation or independent verification at 300 GHz.
domain assumption Polymer, cement, and tile wall surfaces are ordered by roughness from visual inspection and construction standards.
Section V-A explicitly says roughness classification is empirical rather than measured; trend in Figs. 8-9 assumes this ordering.
domain assumption Clusters assigned to a single material via known geometry and specular reflection loss are correct ground truth.
Sections V-B.2 and V-C; labels are not independently measured.
domain assumption The fixed 1.2 m TRx-to-wall distance isolates material effects, and distance changes can be calibrated later.
Section V introduction; compensation statement is not demonstrated.
domain assumption Normal and Weibull distributions are appropriate parametric models for the measured CDFs.
Sections IV and V-C; fits lack goodness-of-fit tests.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Environment-Aware Channel Measurement and Modeling for Terahertz Monostatic Sensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LICVMRTO

@misc{pith2026250902088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Environment-Aware Channel Measurement and Modeling for Terahertz Monostatic Sensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LICVMRTO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02088}
}

read the original abstract

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) at terahertz (THz) frequencies holds significant promise for unifying ultra-high-speed wireless connectivity with fine-grained environmental awareness. Realistic and interpretable channel modeling is essential to fully realize the potential of such systems. This work presents a comprehensive investigation of monostatic sensing channels at 300~GHz, based on an extensive measurement campaign conducted at 57 co-located transceiver (TRx) positions across three representative indoor scenarios. Multipath component (MPC) parameters, including amplitude, delay, and angle, are extracted using a high-resolution space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization (SAGE) algorithm. To cluster the extracted MPCs, an image-processing-based clustering method, i.e., connected component labeling (CCL), is applied to group MPCs based on delay-angle consistency. Based on the measurement data, an environment-aware channel modeling framework is proposed to establish mappings between physical scenario attributes (e.g., reflector geometry, surface materials, and roughness) and their corresponding channel-domain manifestations. The framework incorporates both specular and diffuse reflections and leverages several channel parameters, e.g., reflection loss, Lambertian scattering, and intra-cluster dispersion models, to characterize reflection behavior. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach can reliably extract physical characteristics, e.g., structural and material information, from the observed channel characteristics, offering a promising foundation for advanced THz ISAC channel modeling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02088 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Results of PADP, identified MPC clusters, and the esti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** The CDF of the number of MPC clusters and the fitted mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (9 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Exemplary results of reflection loss analysis. (a) Th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The CDF of the logarithmic delay depth, logarithmic a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The framework of the environment-aware channel mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The reflected MPCs from flat walls composed of three mat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The relationship between the diffuse power with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The layout of the indoor representative physical str [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Analysis of structural modeling using empirical da [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: The CDF of the material-specific intra-cluster dela [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: The CDF of the reflection loss of the specular and diffu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[19]

Hybrid channel modeling and environment reconstruction for terahertz monostatic s ensing,

Y . Lyu, Z. Huang, S. Schwarz, and C. Han, “Hybrid channel modeling and environment reconstruction for terahertz monostatic s ensing,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , pp. 1–1, 2025

work page 2025
[20]

Centimeter-level geometry r econstruction and material identiﬁcation in 300 GHz monostatic sensing,

Z. Fang, Z. Y u, and C. Han, “Centimeter-level geometry r econstruction and material identiﬁcation in 300 GHz monostatic sensing,” in 2025 19th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) , 2025, pp. 1–5

work page 2025
[1]

A shared cl uster-based stochastic channel model for integrated sensing and commun ication systems,

Y . Liu, J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Z. Y uan, and G. Liu, “A shared cl uster-based stochastic channel model for integrated sensing and commun ication systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 6032–6044, 2024

work page 2024
[2]

6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, ar chitecture, and key technologies,

Z. Zhang, Y . Xiao, Z. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Ding, X. Lei, G. K. Kara giannidis, and P . Fan, “6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, ar chitecture, and key technologies,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag. , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–41, 2019

work page 2019
[3]

On th e road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and te stbeds,

C.-X. Wang, X. Y ou, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Huang, Y . Chen, H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, E. G. Larsson, M. D. Renzo, W. Tong, P . Zhu, X. Shen, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “On th e road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and te stbeds,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Integrated sensing and communication c hannel modeling and measurements: Requirements and methodologie s toward 6G standardization,

W. Y ang, Y . Chen, N. Cardona, Y . Zhang, Z. Y u, M. Zhang, J. L i, Y . Chen, and P . Zhu, “Integrated sensing and communication c hannel modeling and measurements: Requirements and methodologie s toward 6G standardization,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 2024

work page 2024
[5]

Deep reinforcement learning for energy efﬁciency maximization in RSMA- IRS-assisted ISAC system,

Z. Ma, R. Zhang, B. Ai, Z. Lian, L. Zeng, D. Niyato, and Y . Pe ng, “Deep reinforcement learning for energy efﬁciency maximization in RSMA- IRS-assisted ISAC system,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, pp. 1–6, 2025

work page 2025
[6]

Joint sensing and communication for situational awareness in wir eless THz systems,

C. Chaccour, W. Saad, O. Semiari, M. Bennis, and P . Popovs ki, “Joint sensing and communication for situational awareness in wir eless THz systems,” in Proc. of IEEE ICC , 2022, pp. 3772–3777

work page 2022

Show all 41 references

[7]

Mobile terahertz communication and sensing systems: A future look ,

J. M. Jornet, H. Elayan, T. Nagatsuma, M. Juntti, E. T. R. P into, T. K¨ urner, H. Guerboukha, D. M. Mittleman, and E. Knightly, “Mobile terahertz communication and sensing systems: A future look ,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 20–35, 2024

2024
[8]

Terahertz communications and sensing for 6G and beyond: A comprehensive review,

W. Jiang, Q. Zhou, J. He, M. A. Habibi, S. Melnyk, M. El-Abs i, B. Han, M. D. Renzo, H. D. Schotten, F.-L. Luo, T. S. El-Bawab, M. Junt ti, M. Debbah, and V . C. M. Leung, “Terahertz communications and sensing for 6G and beyond: A comprehensive review,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuto...

2024
[9]

Characterization of propagati on from measurements at sub-THz for ISAC applications in an emulate d dynamic industrial scenario,

D. Dupleich, A. Ebert, Y . V¨ olker-Sch¨ oneberg, D. Sitdi kov, M. Boban, G. Del Galdo, and R. Thom¨ a, “Characterization of propagati on from measurements at sub-THz for ISAC applications in an emulate d dynamic industrial scenario,” in Proc. of EuCAP , 2024, pp. 1–5

2024
[10]

THz ISCI: Terahertz integrat ed sensing, communication and intelligence,

Y . Wu, C. Han, and Z. Chen, “THz ISCI: Terahertz integrat ed sensing, communication and intelligence,” in Proc. of IRMMW-THz , 2021, pp. 1–2

2021
[11]

Terahertz wireless communications for 2030 and be yond: A cutting-edge frontier,

Z. Chen, C. Han, Y . Wu, L. Li, C. Huang, Z. Zhang, G. Wang, a nd W. Tong, “Terahertz wireless communications for 2030 and be yond: A cutting-edge frontier,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 66–72, 2021
[12]

Method- ology for benchmarking radio-frequency channel sounders t hrough a system model,

C. Gentile, A. F. Molisch, J. Chuang, D. G. Michelson, A. Bodi, A. Bhardwaj, O. Ozdemir, W. A. G. Khawaja, I. Guvenc, Z. Cheng , F. Rottenberg, T. Choi, R. M¨ uller, N. Han, and D. Dupleich, “ Method- ology for benchmarking radio-frequency channel sounders t hrough a system mo...

2020
[13]

Molisch, Wireless communications

A. Molisch, Wireless communications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2011

2011
[14]

Channel measurement, modeling, and simulation for 6G: A survey and tutorial,

J. Zhang, J. Lin, P . Tang, Y . Zhang, H. Xu, T. Gao, H. Miao, Z. Chai, Z. Zhou, Y . Li et al. , “Channel measurement, modeling, and simulation for 6G: A survey and tutorial,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16616 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[15]

The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6 g: Vision, techniques, and applications,

N. Gonz´ alez-Prelcic, M. Furkan Keskin, O. Kaltiokall io, M. V alkama, D. Dardari, X. Shen, Y . Shen, M. Bayraktar, and H. Wymeersch, “The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6 g: Vision, techniques, and applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 112, no. 7...

2024
[16]

A scatterer-bas ed hybrid channel model for integrated sensing and communications (I SAC),

Y . Chen, Z. Y u, J. He, J. Li, and G. Wang, “A scatterer-bas ed hybrid channel model for integrated sensing and communications (I SAC),” in Proc. of IEEE PIMRC , 2023, pp. 1–7

2023
[17]

300 GHz experim ent- based ranging and mapping in indoor environments,

Y . Li, Y . Wang, Y . Chen, Z. Y u, and C. Han, “300 GHz experim ent- based ranging and mapping in indoor environments,” in Proc. of IEEE SPAWC, 2023, pp. 396–400. 13

2023
[18]

Radio SLAM for 6G systems at THz frequencies: Design and exp eri- mental validation,

M. Lotti, G. Pasolini, A. Guerra, F. Guidi, R. d’Errico, and D. Dardari, “Radio SLAM for 6G systems at THz frequencies: Design and exp eri- mental validation,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 834–849, 2023

2023
[21]

Transmission, reﬂection, and scattering characterizati on of building materials for indoor THz communications,

F. Taleb, G. G. Hernandez-Cardoso, E. Castro-Camus, an d M. Koch, “Transmission, reﬂection, and scattering characterizati on of building materials for indoor THz communications,” IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology , vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 421–430, 2023

2023
[22]

Noncontact characterization of carrier mob ility in long- wave infrared hgcdte ﬁlms with terahertz time-domain spect roscopy,

N. B. Refvik, C. E. Jensen, D. N. Purschke, W. Pan, H. R. J. Simpson, W. Lei, R. Gu, J. Antoszewski, G. A. Umana-Membreno, L. Farao ne, and F. A. Hegmann, “Noncontact characterization of carrier mob ility in long- wave infrared hgcdte ﬁlms with terahertz time-domain spect rosc...

2024
[23]

The impact of reﬂections from stratiﬁed building materials on t he wave propagation in future indoor terahertz communication syst ems,

C. Jansen, R. Piesiewicz, D. Mittleman, T. Kurner, and M . Koch, “The impact of reﬂections from stratiﬁed building materials on t he wave propagation in future indoor terahertz communication syst ems,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1413– 1...

2008
[24]

Characterization of building mater ials for the modeling of pico-cellular thz communication systems,

T. Kleine-Ostmann, R. Piesiewicz, N. Krumbholz, D. Mit tleman, T. Kurner, and M. Koch, “Characterization of building mater ials for the modeling of pico-cellular thz communication systems,” in 2005 Joint 30th International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter W aves and 13th ...

2005
[25]

Sub-THz VNA-based chann el sounder structure and channel measurements at 100 and 300 GHz,

Y . Lyu, P . Ky¨ osti, and W. Fan, “Sub-THz VNA-based chann el sounder structure and channel measurements at 100 and 300 GHz,” in Proc. of PIMRC, 2021, pp. 1–5

2021
[26]

DSS-o-SAGE: Dir ection- scan sounding-oriented SAGE algorithm for channel paramet er estima- tion in mmWave and THz bands,

Y . Li, C. Han, Y . Chen, Z. Y u, and X. Yin, “DSS-o-SAGE: Dir ection- scan sounding-oriented SAGE algorithm for channel paramet er estima- tion in mmWave and THz bands,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. , pp. 1–1, 2024

2024
[27]

Random projection de pth for multi- variate mathematical morphology,

S. V elasco-Forero and J. Angulo, “Random projection de pth for multi- variate mathematical morphology,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 753–763, 2012

2012
[28]

SAR image segmenta tion and target detection based on mathematical morphology,

M. Xiao, H. Wang, Z. Zeng, and Y . Bie, “SAR image segmenta tion and target detection based on mathematical morphology,” in 2021 2nd China International SAR Symposium (CISS) , 2021, pp. 1–5

2021
[29]

Efﬁcient dilation, erosion, op ening, and closing algorithms,

J. Y . Gil and R. Kimmel, “Efﬁcient dilation, erosion, op ening, and closing algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1606–1617, 2002

2002
[30]

Clustering enabled wireless channel modeling using big data algorithms,

R. He, B. Ai, A. F. Molisch, G. L. Stuber, Q. Li, Z. Zhong, a nd J. Y u, “Clustering enabled wireless channel modeling using big data algorithms,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 177– 183, 2018

2018
[31]

IEEE 802.15. 4a channel model-ﬁnal report,

A. F. Molisch, K. Balakrishnan, C.-C. Chong, S. Emami, A . Fort, J. Karedal, J. Kunisch, H. Schantz, U. Schuster, and K. Siwia k, “IEEE 802.15. 4a channel model-ﬁnal report,” IEEE P802 , vol. 15, no. 04, p. 0662, 2004

2004
[32]

A framework of Mahala nobis- distance metric with supervised learning for clustering mu ltipath com- ponents in MIMO channel analysis,

Y . Chen, C. Han, J. He, and G. Wang, “A framework of Mahala nobis- distance metric with supervised learning for clustering mu ltipath com- ponents in MIMO channel analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 4069–4081, 2022

2022
[33]

142 GHz sub-terahertz radio propagation measurements and channel characterization in factory buildings,

S. Ju, D. Shakya, H. Poddar, Y . Xing, O. Kanhere, and T. S. Rappaport, “142 GHz sub-terahertz radio propagation measurements and channel characterization in factory buildings,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7127–7143, 2024

2024
[34]

First- and second-order characterization of direction disper- sion and space selectivity in the radio channel,

B. Fleury, “First- and second-order characterization of direction disper- sion and space selectivity in the radio channel,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2027–2044, 2000

2027
[35]

Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 t o 100 GHz,

3GPP , “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 t o 100 GHz,” 3GPP , Tech. Rep. V17.0.0, March 2022

2022
[36]

Sub- terahertz channel characterization in a lecture room from m easurements with phase drift by a rotating horn antenna,

K.-W. Kim, M.-D. Kim, J.-J. Park, J. Lee, and H.-K. Kwon, “Sub- terahertz channel characterization in a lecture room from m easurements with phase drift by a rotating horn antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 1110–1124, 2025

2025
[37]

Measurem ents and modeling of depolarization characteristics from rough sur faces at Sub- THz band for indoor short-range communications,

X. Liao, C. Lin, X. Zheng, Y . Wang, and H. Song, “Measurem ents and modeling of depolarization characteristics from rough sur faces at Sub- THz band for indoor short-range communications,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 4802–4806, 2024

2024
[38]

Pola rization characterization of thz scattering from rough surfaces bas ed on deep learning,

X. Zhao, B. Chen, K. Guan, B. Lu, Y . Wei, and M. Dong, “Pola rization characterization of thz scattering from rough surfaces bas ed on deep learning,” in 2024 4th URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC) , 2024, pp. 1–4

2024
[39]

Inﬂuence of surface roughness on material classiﬁcation for reﬂective THz-TDS measure- ments,

S. T. Gassel, M. R. Hofmann, and C. Brenner, “Inﬂuence of surface roughness on material classiﬁcation for reﬂective THz-TDS measure- ments,” in 2023 48th International Conference on Infrared, Millimete r , and Terahertz W aves (IRMMW-THz), 2023, pp. 1–2

2023
[40]

Full-wave simulation and scattering modeling fo r terahertz communications,

H. Yi, K. Guan, P . T. Mathiopoulos, P . Xie, D. He, J. Dou, a nd Z. Zhong, “Full-wave simulation and scattering modeling fo r terahertz communications,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 713–728, 2023

2023
[41]

Measurement and modelling of scattering from buildings,

V . Degli-Esposti, F. Fuschini, E. M. Vitucci, and G. Fal ciasecca, “Measurement and modelling of scattering from buildings,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 143–153, 2007

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [19]

Hybrid channel modeling and environment reconstruction for terahertz monostatic s ensing,

Y . Lyu, Z. Huang, S. Schwarz, and C. Han, “Hybrid channel modeling and environment reconstruction for terahertz monostatic s ensing,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , pp. 1–1, 2025

work page 2025

[2] [20]

Centimeter-level geometry r econstruction and material identiﬁcation in 300 GHz monostatic sensing,

Z. Fang, Z. Y u, and C. Han, “Centimeter-level geometry r econstruction and material identiﬁcation in 300 GHz monostatic sensing,” in 2025 19th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) , 2025, pp. 1–5

work page 2025

[3] [1]

A shared cl uster-based stochastic channel model for integrated sensing and commun ication systems,

Y . Liu, J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Z. Y uan, and G. Liu, “A shared cl uster-based stochastic channel model for integrated sensing and commun ication systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 6032–6044, 2024

work page 2024

[4] [2]

6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, ar chitecture, and key technologies,

Z. Zhang, Y . Xiao, Z. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Ding, X. Lei, G. K. Kara giannidis, and P . Fan, “6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, ar chitecture, and key technologies,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag. , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–41, 2019

work page 2019

[5] [3]

On th e road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and te stbeds,

C.-X. Wang, X. Y ou, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Huang, Y . Chen, H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, E. G. Larsson, M. D. Renzo, W. Tong, P . Zhu, X. Shen, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “On th e road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and te stbeds,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [4]

Integrated sensing and communication c hannel modeling and measurements: Requirements and methodologie s toward 6G standardization,

W. Y ang, Y . Chen, N. Cardona, Y . Zhang, Z. Y u, M. Zhang, J. L i, Y . Chen, and P . Zhu, “Integrated sensing and communication c hannel modeling and measurements: Requirements and methodologie s toward 6G standardization,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 2024

work page 2024

[7] [5]

Deep reinforcement learning for energy efﬁciency maximization in RSMA- IRS-assisted ISAC system,

Z. Ma, R. Zhang, B. Ai, Z. Lian, L. Zeng, D. Niyato, and Y . Pe ng, “Deep reinforcement learning for energy efﬁciency maximization in RSMA- IRS-assisted ISAC system,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, pp. 1–6, 2025

work page 2025

[8] [6]

Joint sensing and communication for situational awareness in wir eless THz systems,

C. Chaccour, W. Saad, O. Semiari, M. Bennis, and P . Popovs ki, “Joint sensing and communication for situational awareness in wir eless THz systems,” in Proc. of IEEE ICC , 2022, pp. 3772–3777

work page 2022