Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

GENIE: Toward Reproducible and Standardized Human Evaluation for Text Generation

As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2101.06561.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2101.06561 v4

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 2 of 2 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T00:31:55.913375Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-05T15:54:20.311150Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 615b277e-dbe7-4134-9274-7e992d1817d0 · inbound

Min-p, Max Exaggeration: A Critical Analysis of Min-p Sampling in Language Models cites this paper.

Min-p, Max Exaggeration: A Critical Analysis of Min-p Sampling in Language Models GENIE: Toward Reproducible and Standardized Human Evaluation for Text Generation

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T00:31:55.913375Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-07T00:31:55.913375Z digest=sha256:95fc88d70a7d5fafd6d4a5a185702b91245b2f65e3f881b3ff8c82a2a1ef0791

Observation 2d57b898-89ac-4dfd-aaa3-26d4b0c34c53 · inbound

Evaluating the Evaluators: Are readability metrics good measures of readability? cites this paper.

Evaluating the Evaluators: Are readability metrics good measures of readability? GENIE: Toward Reproducible and Standardized Human Evaluation for Text Generation

Reference 32

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T15:54:20.499120Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T15:54:09.551846Z digest=sha256:227ce5da33d9123aa0b080a0bfa87bb51e189767e0639dc015bad5c5c6499489