Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Unitary matrix integrals become spin-chain vacuum correlators

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-08 07:25 UTC pith:LJTMSEGT

load-bearing objection Novel correspondence between unitary matrix models and spin-chain correlators; convergence of normal-ordered exponentials is the open question the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06384 v1 pith:LJTMSEGT submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th

Unitary matrix models, quantized symmetric functions and spin chain

Gao-fu Ren This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.30.Pb02.10.Ox02.20.Uw05.50.+q
keywords functionsunitarymatrixsymmetricmodelmodelsquantizedquantum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that a broad class of unitary matrix models — integrals over the unitary group U(N) with a symmetric integrand — can be exactly recast as vacuum expectation values of operators acting on the N-magnon sector of a quantum spin-chain Hilbert space. The central construction proceeds in two stages. First, the author lifts the classical ring of symmetric functions (Schur functions, power-sums, etc.) to noncommutative operators acting on spin-chain states, using the Fomin-Greene quantization scheme realized through the nil-Temperley-Lieb algebra of free-fermion shift operators. The key property is that this quantization preserves all structure constants: products of quantized Schur functions multiply with the same Littlewood-Richardson coefficients as their classical counterparts, and quantized power-sums reproduce the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule for symmetric group characters. Second, after diagonalizing the unitary matrix, the integrand is expanded in Schur functions and the Schur orthogonality relation of the unitary group integral is translated into the inner product of quantized Schur states in the spin chain. The result is a dictionary: the Vandermonde-squared eigenvalue integral maps to a vacuum correlator, with Tr(M^k) mapping to a conserved current operator p̂_k and Tr(M†^k) mapping to its adjoint. The paper illustrates this with three examples: the Gross-Witten-Wadia model (where the weak-coupling expansion generates nearest-neighbor hopping and density corrections on the chain), superconformal indices of N=4 super Yang-Mills for all classical gauge groups, and Toda tau functions.

Core claim

The load-bearing discovery is that Schur orthogonality under the unitary group Haar measure and the inner product of quantized Schur states in the N-magnon spin-chain sector are the same algebraic statement, once symmetric functions are lifted to operators via the nil-Temperley-Lieb realization of the Fomin-Greene quantization. Concretely, for any unitary matrix model whose integrand factors as a sum of products of symmetric polynomials in the eigenvalues and their inverses, the partition function Z equals the vacuum correlator ⟨∅, N| :f̂: |∅, N⟩, where f̂ is obtained by replacing each classical power-sum p_k with the free-fermion current operator Ĵ_k. The paper proves that the quantized p̂_

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the identification of quantized power-sum symmetric functions p̂_k with free-fermion current operators Ĵ_k = Σ c†_{i+k} c_i, acting on the N-magnon vacuum |∅, N⟩ of a semi-infinite XX spin chain. These operators are built from nil-Temperley-Lieb shift operators x̂_i = c†_{i+1} c_i. The quantization preserves the full ring structure: Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, skew Kostka numbers, and skew characters all carry over unchanged from the commutative theory. Normal ordering of the operator f̂ generates the corrections that encode the matrix-model measure.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the Fomin-Greene quantization scheme, when realized through the nil-Temperley-Lieb algebra on the spin-chain Hilbert space, preserves the full ring structure of symmetric functions for arbitrary integrands — including cases where normal ordering generates higher-order corrections (as seen in the GWW model). The paper assumes these corrections are consistently captured by the operator formalism without breaking the correspondence.

What would settle it

Find a unitary matrix model whose integrand admits the required factorized Schur expansion but whose partition function does not equal the spin-chain vacuum correlator ⟨∅, N| :f̂: |∅, N⟩ — specifically, one where normal ordering corrections from the operator formalism fail to reproduce the eigenvalue integral for some f(λ).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Gross-Witten third-order phase transition and the Hawking-Page transition of N=4 SYM superconformal indices could be studied as dynamical critical phenomena of XXZ spin chains, using thermodynamic Bethe ansatz or quantum quench methods.
  • Evaluation of superconformal indices and Toda tau functions at finite N could be reformulated as quantum computation problems, since the spin-chain correlators are naturally expressible as matrix product states and matrix product operators.
  • The correspondence provides a unified algebraic origin for the appearance of free fermions, integrable hierarchies, and symmetric function orthogonality in seemingly distinct contexts — random matrix theory, supersymmetric gauge theory, and integrable systems.
  • The method should extend to orthogonal and symplectic matrix ensembles by replacing Schur functions with the corresponding characters, as the Sp(2N) and SO(N) superconformal index examples already demonstrate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a correspondence between unitary matrix models and vacuum correlation functions in the N-magnon sector of a spin-chain Hilbert space. The key mechanism is the Fomin-Greene quantization of symmetric functions, which lifts classical Schur functions to operators acting on the spin-chain Hilbert space while preserving ring structure constants (Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, skew Kostka numbers, skew characters). The Schur orthogonality of the unitary group integral is then translated into the inner product of quantized Schur states. The framework is illustrated with the Gross-Witten-Wadia model, superconformal indices of N=4 SYM with classical gauge groups, and Toda tau functions. The key identity (3.44) is proven in Appendix A.1, and the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule derivation for quantized power-sum operators is given in Appendix A.2.

Significance. The paper provides a parameter-free, self-contained algebraic bridge between unitary matrix integrals and spin-chain correlators. The proofs in Appendices A.1 and A.2 are detailed and constructive: the vacuum property (3.44) is verified combinatorially, and the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule is derived from first principles via the fermionic shift-operator action. The application to superconformal indices for all classical gauge groups (Section 4.2) and Toda tau functions (Section 4.3) demonstrates the breadth of the framework. The correspondence is falsifiable: for any finite polynomial integrand, the Schur expansion is finite and the equality can be checked term by term.

major comments (3)
  1. §4, Eq. (4.5) and §4.1, Eq. (4.7): The central correspondence (4.5) is established rigorously for finite polynomial integrands via the chain: Schur expansion → orthogonality (4.3) → quantized ring lift (3.44). However, all three applications (GWW, superconformal index, Toda) involve exponential integrands, where the operator f̂ is an exponential of quantized power-sum operators and normal ordering :f̂: generates an infinite correction series. For the GWW model, Eq. (4.7) displays the first few terms of C but does not prove that the resulting series converges or sums to the exact GWW partition function at finite N/λ. The paper should either (a) prove that the normal-ordered exponential reproduces the exact matrix integral for at least one of the three examples at finite N, or (b) explicitly state the scope of the correspondence (4.5) as applying to finite polynomial integrands, with theex
  2. §4.2, Eqs. (4.27)-(4.28): The operators Â_n, Ĉ_n, B̂_n, D̂_n are defined as quadratic expressions in p̂_n and p̂†_n. However, the classical expressions C_n, B_n, D_n in (4.26) involve products like (p_n + p†_n)² which, upon quantization, require a choice of operator ordering. The paper does not specify the ordering convention used in passing from (4.26) to (4.27). Since [p̂_n, p̂†_n] ≠ 0 in general (cf. Eq. (3.37)), different orderings yield different operators and potentially different correlators. The authors should state the ordering prescription explicitly and verify that the resulting vacuum correlator reproduces the known superconformal index.
  3. §4.3, Eq. (4.46): The finite-N Toda tau function is expressed as a vacuum correlator of two exponentials. Here the exponentials are not normal-ordered (no •• •• notation appears), unlike in (4.5) and (4.7). It is unclear whether normal ordering is implicitly assumed, or whether the two exponentials in (4.46) commute sufficiently for the correlator to be well-defined without normal ordering. The authors should clarify this point and verify consistency with the free-fermion expression (4.37).
minor comments (6)
  1. §2.1: The Bethe ansatz wavefunction (2.4) and equations (2.5)-(2.6) are standard but the scattering matrix S(p_a, p_b) in (2.6) is written for the XXZ chain with rapidity u_a = 2 cot(p_a/2). The sign convention for Δ appears non-standard (the isotropic limit is stated as Δ=0, which gives the XX model, but the standard convention has the XXX point at Δ=1). The authors should clarify their convention.
  2. §3.3, Eq. (3.34): The projected current Ĵ_k = P'_1 J_k is defined, but the relation between Ĵ_k and the shift operators x̂_i of (3.30) is not made fully explicit. A brief remark connecting the two would help the reader.
  3. §4.1, Eq. (4.7): The notation for the normal-ordered exponential e^C is introduced without explicitly defining the normal ordering of the exponential itself. It would help to state whether :exp(A): = exp(:A:) or whether additional BCH corrections are involved.
  4. Figure 1: The caption references the state |↓↑↓↑↓↑↑⟩ but the figure is not visible in the text. Please ensure the figure is included and legible.
  5. References: The arXiv identifier for Ref. [5] (1212.2906) appears to be missing the hep-th prefix. Ref. [26] lacks an arXiv identifier.
  6. Typos: 'Suprconformal' in Keywords; 'I thanks' in Acknowledgements; 'exponential integrands used in all three applications' — the Toda case (4.46) uses exponentials but is not an exponential integrand in the same sense as GWW.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. All three major comments concern the treatment of exponential integrands and operator ordering in the applications of Section 4. We agree with the substance of each comment and will revise the manuscript accordingly. Specifically: (1) we will explicitly state that the rigorous correspondence (4.5) is established for finite polynomial integrands, and that the exponential cases (GWW, superconformal index, Toda) involve a formal lift whose term-by-term expansion is controlled by the polynomial correspondence; for the Toda case we can in fact prove exact equality at finite N. (2) We will state the ordering prescription for the quadratic operators in (4.27) explicitly and verify it. (3) We will clarify that normal ordering is implicitly assumed in (4.46) and verify consistency with the free-fermion expression (4.37).

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4, Eq. (4.5) and §4.1, Eq. (4.7): The central correspondence (4.5) is established rigorously for finite polynomial integrands via the chain: Schur expansion → orthogonality (4.3) → quantized ring lift (3.44). However, all three applications (GWW, superconformal index, Toda) involve exponential integrands, where the operator f̂ is an exponential of quantized power-sum operators and normal ordering :f̂: generates an infinite correction series. For the GWW model, Eq. (4.7) displays the first few terms of C but does not prove that the resulting series converges or sums to the exact GWW partition function at finite N/λ. The paper should either (a) prove that the normal-ordered exponential reproduces the exact matrix integral for at least one of the three examples at finite N, or (b) explicitly state the scope of the correspondence (4.5) as applying to finite polynomial integrands, with the [

    Authors: The referee is correct that the rigorous correspondence (4.5) is established for finite polynomial integrands, and that the extension to exponential integrands requires additional justification. We will adopt option (b) as the primary revision: we will explicitly state in the text that the scope of the rigorous correspondence (4.5) is for finite polynomial integrands, and that the exponential cases (GWW, superconformal index, Toda) involve a formal lift where each term in the expansion of the exponential is individually controlled by the polynomial correspondence. However, we can also partially address option (a): for the Toda tau function case (Section 4.3, Eq. (4.46)), the equality at finite N can be proven exactly. The key point is that the free-fermion expression (4.37) is already a rigorously defined Hirota tau function, and the spin-chain expression (4.46) is obtained from it by the Jordan-Wigner isomorphism of Section 2.3, which is an exact unitary equivalence at finite N. The two exponentials in (4.46) are well-defined because the arguments are linear in the commuting currents Ĵ_k (satisfying [Ĵ_k, Ĵ_{k'}] = 0 by Eq. (3.36)), so no normal-ordering ambiguities arise in this particular case. For the GWW model, we agree that convergence of the normal-ordered series at finite N/λ is not proven in the current manuscript. We will add an explicit remark stating that the GWW expression (4.7) should be understood as a formal expansion whose term-by-term coefficients are determined by the polynomial correspondence, and that proving convergence at finite N/λ is left as an open problem. We will also note that in the large N limit, the leading term of (4.7) reproduces the known GWW free-fermion (XX chain) result, providing a non-trivial consistency check. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4.2, Eqs. (4.27)-(4.28): The operators Â_n, Ĉ_n, B̂_n, D̂_n are defined as quadratic expressions in p̂_n and p̂†_n. However, the classical expressions C_n, B_n, D_n in (4.26) involve products like (p_n + p†_n)² which, upon quantization, require a choice of operator ordering. The paper does not specify the ordering convention used in passing from (4.26) to (4.27). Since [p̂_n, p̂†_n] ≠ 0 in general (cf. Eq. (3.37)), different orderings yield different operators and potentially different correlators. The authors should state the ordering prescription explicitly and verify that the resulting vacuum correlator reproduces the known superconformal index.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the ordering prescription is not stated explicitly and that this is an important gap, since [p̂_n, p̂†_n] ≠ 0 by Eq. (3.37). We will revise the manuscript to state the ordering convention explicitly. The prescription is as follows: the operators in (4.27) are defined by symmetrizing the classical quadratic expressions and then applying the normal-ordering convention of (4.5), i.e., all p̂†_n are moved to the left of all p̂_n. Concretely, the classical expression (p_n + p†_n)² is lifted to the operator (p̂_n + p̂†_n)² which, upon normal ordering, becomes p̂†²_n + 2 p̂†_n p̂_n + p̂²_n plus commutator corrections. The specific form of Ĉ_n, B̂_n, D̂_n in (4.27) already reflects this: the terms p̂†²_n and p̂²_n appear with the same coefficient as in the classical expression, and the cross term is the normal-ordered product p̂†_n p̂_n. We will add an explicit sentence stating this convention and will verify that the resulting vacuum correlators reproduce the known superconformal indices by checking that the normal-ordered operators, when expanded using the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule (3.42) and the ring structure (3.41), reproduce the same Schur expansion coefficients as the classical matrix integral. The verification proceeds term by term: each monomial in the expansion of the exponential is a product of quantized power-sum operators acting on the vacuum, and by the ring-preserving property (3.4), the resulting Schur coefficients coincide with the classical ones. We agree this verification should be made explicit in the text and will add it. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §4.3, Eq. (4.46): The finite-N Toda tau function is expressed as a vacuum correlator of two exponentials. Here the exponentials are not normal-ordered (no •• •• notation appears), unlike in (4.5) and (4.7). It is unclear whether normal ordering is implicitly assumed, or whether the two exponentials in (4.46) commute sufficiently for the correlator to be well-defined without normal ordering. The authors should clarify this point and verify consistency with the free-fermion expression (4.37).

    Authors: The referee raises a valid point about the absence of normal-ordering notation in (4.46). The resolution is that normal ordering is not needed in this case because the two exponentials involve only the commuting currents: the left exponential contains only p̂†_k = Ĵ†_k and the right exponential contains only p̂_k = Ĵ_k. Since [Ĵ_k, Ĵ_{k'}] = 0 and [Ĵ†_k, Ĵ†_{k'}] = 0 by Eq. (3.36), each exponential is individually well-defined without normal ordering. The only non-trivial commutator is the mixed one [Ĵ†_k, Ĵ_{k'}] from Eq. (3.37), but this does not arise within a single exponential. The correlator ⟨∅, N| exp(Σ t⁻_k/k · p̂†_k) exp(Σ t⁺_k/k · p̂_k) |∅, N⟩ is therefore well-defined as written. We will add a clarifying remark to this effect. Regarding consistency with the free-fermion expression (4.37): the equality follows from the Jordan-Wigner isomorphism of Section 2.3, which provides an exact unitary map between the spin-chain Hilbert space and the free-fermion Fock space. Under this map, the quantized power-sum operators p̂_k = Ĵ_k correspond to the free-fermion currents J_k (projected to the N-magnon sector), and the coherent states |t⟩ of (4.41) correspond to the group-like elements e^{J+(t)} in the free-fermion formalism. The projection P⁻_{M+1} in (4.37) enforces the finite-N constraint, which in the spin-chain language is implemented by the choice of the N-magnon vacuum |∅, N⟩. We will add a sentence making this correspondence explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained with only minor contextual self-citations

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is: (1) diagonalize the unitary matrix integral to an eigenvalue integral (standard), (2) assume the integrand admits a factorized Schur expansion (Eq. 4.2, stated as an assumption), (3) apply Schur orthogonality (Eq. 4.3, a standard mathematical fact), (4) lift classical symmetric functions to quantized operators using the Fomin-Greene framework [24, external], (5) use the vacuum property ŝ_λ|∅,N⟩ = |λ,N⟩ (Eq. 3.44, proven in Appendix A.1 by direct computation), and (6) use the ring-structure preservation Ĉ^λ_μν = C^λ_μν (Eq. 3.4, proven in Appendix A.2 via the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule). No step in this chain reduces to its own inputs by construction. The load-bearing citations are all external: Fomin-Greene [24] for the quantization scheme, Crichigno-Prakash [22] for the spin-chain realization, Alexandrov-Zabrodin [30] for free-fermion tau functions, and Wheeler [21] for the free-fermion construction. The author's self-citations [12, 13] appear only in the introduction for motivational context (superconformal indices and symmetric functions) and are not invoked as premises in the derivation. The examples (GWW, superconformal indices, Toda tau functions) apply the dictionary (4.5) to known integral representations from external sources [9, 31, 20] without introducing fitted parameters. The skeptic's concern about normal-ordering convergence (Eq. 4.7) is a correctness/completeness issue, not circularity: the paper does not claim the normal-ordered series is a prediction, and the mapping itself (4.5) is established algebraically for finite polynomial integrands before any exponential is considered. Score 1 reflects the minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. The construction relies on standard mathematical structures (Clifford algebra, nil-Temperley-Lieb algebra, Schur functions) and physical constants (N, λ) that are inputs from the models being studied.

axioms (3)
  • standard math Fomin-Greene quantization scheme preserves ring structure (Eq. 3.4)
    Invoked in Section 3.2 as the basis for the quantized symmetric function theory. This is a published mathematical result [24].
  • standard math Schur orthogonality on the unitary group (Eq. 4.3)
    Invoked in Section 4 to collapse the matrix integral. This is a standard result in representation theory.
  • domain assumption Factorized expansion of the integrand (Eq. 4.2)
    Invoked in Section 4. The paper assumes the integrand f(λ) can be written as a sum of products of symmetric polynomials in λ and λ^{-1}. This holds for the examples given but may not hold for all unitary matrix models.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 25110 in / 2147 out tokens · 429905 ms · 2026-07-08T07:25:17.430808+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct a correspondence between a broad class of unitary matrix models and vacuum correlation functions in quantum spin-chain Hilbert spaces. The key step is to lift symmetric functions to operators acting on the $N$-magnon sector in a way that preserves the relevant ring structure. For any unitary matrix model whose integrand admits a factorized expansion in symmetric functions, the Schur orthogonality of the unitary group integral is then translated into the inner product of quantized Schur states. We illustrate the construction for the Gross--Witten--Wadia model, superconformal indices of $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang--Mills theory with classical gauge groups, and Toda tau functions. The resulting operator formulation provides a unified algebraic bridge between unitary matrix integrals, quantum integrable systems and symmetric function theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Douglas and S.H

    M.R. Douglas and S.H. Shenker,Strings in Less Than One-Dimension,Nucl. Phys. B335 (1990) 635

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    Banks, M.R

    T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, N. Seiberg and S.H. Shenker,Microscopic and Macroscopic Loops in Nonperturbative Two-dimensional Gravity,Phys. Lett. B238(1990) 279

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    Gross and E

    D.J. Gross and E. Witten,Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 446

    work page 1980

  4. [4]

    Wadia,N= Infinity Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,Phys

    S.R. Wadia,N= Infinity Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,Phys. Lett. B93(1980) 403

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    A Study of U(N) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2-dimensions

    S.R. Wadia,A Study of U(N) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2-dimensions,1212.2906

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Multiple phases in a generalized Gross-Witten-Wadia matrix model

    J.G. Russo and M. Tierz,Multiple phases in a generalized Gross-Witten-Wadia matrix model,JHEP09(2020) 081 [2007.08515]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Deconfinement in Matrix Models about the Gross--Witten Point

    A. Dumitru, J. Lenaghan and R.D. Pisarski,Deconfinement in matrix models about the Gross-Witten point,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 074004 [hep-ph/0410294]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Delayed Deconfinement and the Hawking-Page Transition

    C. Copetti, A. Grassi, Z. Komargodski and L. Tizzano,Delayed deconfinement and the Hawking-Page transition,JHEP04(2022) 132 [2008.04950]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    An Index for 4 dimensional Super Conformal Theories

    J. Kinney, J.M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251]. – 29 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    Character Expansion Methods for $\mathrm{USp}(2N)$, $\mathrm{SO}(n)$, and $\mathrm{O}(n)$ using the Characters of the Symmetric Group

    A. Sei,Character Expansion Methods forUSp(2N),SO(n), andO(n)using the Characters of the Symmetric Group,2303.03674

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Deformed Schur indices and Macdonald polynomials

    Y. Hatsuda,Deformed Schur indices and Macdonald polynomials,2503.03952

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Ren and M.-x

    G.-f. Ren and M.-x. Huang,Deformed Schur indices of BCD-type forN= 4super Yang-Mills and symmetric functions,JHEP01(2026) 107 [2507.11315]

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Ren and M.-x

    G.-f. Ren and M.-x. Huang,Superconformal index forN= 4Super Yang-Mills and Elliptic Macdonald Polynomials,2604.00924

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S.S. Razamat and W. Yan,Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 147 [1110.3740]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    Bootstrapping the superconformal index with surface defects

    D. Gaiotto, L. Rastelli and S.S. Razamat,Bootstrapping the superconformal index with surface defects,JHEP01(2013) 022 [1207.3577]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    On the N=2 superconformal index and eigenfunctions of the elliptic RS model

    S.S. Razamat,On theN=2 superconformal index and eigenfunctions of the elliptic RS model,Lett. Math. Phys.104(2014) 673 [1309.0278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    The superconformal index of theories of class $\cal S$

    L. Rastelli and S.S. Razamat,The superconformal index of theories of class S.,1412.7131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Free Fermions and Thermal AdS/CFT

    S. Dutta and R. Gopakumar,Free fermions and thermal AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2008) 011 [0711.0133]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Martinec,On the origin of integrability in matrix models,Commun

    E.J. Martinec,On the origin of integrability in matrix models,Commun. Math. Phys.138 (1991) 437

    work page 1991

  20. [20]

    Unitary matrix models, free fermion ensembles, and the giant graviton expansion

    S. Murthy,Unitary matrix models, free fermions, and the giant graviton expansion,Pure Appl. Math. Quart.19(2023) 299 [2202.06897]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Wheeler,Free fermions in classical and quantum integrable models, Ph.D

    M.A. Wheeler,Free fermions in classical and quantum integrable models, Ph.D. thesis, Melbourne U., 2010.1110.6703

    work page arXiv 2010

  22. [22]

    Quantum Spin Chains and Symmetric Functions

    M. Crichigno and A. Prakash,Quantum Spin Chains and Symmetric Functions,2404.04322

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Noncommutative symmetric functions

    I.M. Gelfand, D. Krob, A. Lascoux, B. Leclerc, V.S. Retakh and J.-Y. Thibon, Noncommutative symmetric functions,hep-th/9407124

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Fomin and C

    S. Fomin and C. Greene,Noncommutative schur functions and their applications,Discrete Mathematics193(1998) 179

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    Classical and quantum algorithms for characters of the symmetric group

    S. Bravyi, D. Gosset, V. Havlicek and L. Schatzki,Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Characters of the Symmetric Group,PRX Quantum6(2025) 030323 [2501.12579]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Beals,Quantum computation of fourier transforms over symmetric groups,

    R. Beals,Quantum computation of fourier transforms over symmetric groups,

    work page

  27. [27]

    Kawano and H

    Y. Kawano and H. Sekigawa,Quantum Fourier transform over symmetric groups — improved result,J. Symb. Comput.75(2016) 219

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Black Hole States in Quantum Spin Chains

    C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo,Black Hole States in Quantum Spin Chains,2512.23432

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Hawking-Page transition on a spin chain

    D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, L. Santilli and M. Tierz,Hawking-Page transition on a spin chain,Phys. Rev. Res.6(2024) 033007 [2401.13963]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Free fermions and tau-functions

    A. Alexandrov and A. Zabrodin,Free fermions and tau-functions,J. Geom. Phys.67(2013) 37 [1212.6049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  31. [31]

    Superconformal indices of ${\mathcal N}=4$ SYM field theories

    V.P. Spiridonov and G.S. Vartanov,Superconformal indices ofN= 4SYM field theories, Lett. Math. Phys.100(2012) 97 [1005.4196]. – 30 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    $Q$-Boson model and relations with integrable hierarchies

    T. Araujo,Q-boson model and relations with integrable hierarchies,Nucl. Phys. B1006 (2024) 116640 [2405.01213]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Pozsgay and V

    B. Pozsgay and V. Eisler,Real-time dynamics in a strongly interacting bosonic hopping model: global quenches and mapping to the xx chain,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016(2016) 053107. – 31 –

    work page 2016