Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 120 references

Exceptionality, Supersymmetry and Non-associativity in Physics

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The exceptional Jordan algebra built from octonions uniquely fixes the exceptional supergravity theories, the paper argues, while its split form underlies maximal supergravity.

desk verdict A useful but uneven survey of the author's own line of work: the magical-supergravity/Jordan-algebra dictionary is solid, but the uniqueness and non-embeddability arguments rest on a misstated Zelmanov theorem and need qualification. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17938 v1 pith:LLCPLDY2 submitted 2025-07-23 hep-th math-phmath.MPquant-ph

Murat Gunaydin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords exceptionalJordanalgebraoctonionsnon-associativealgebrassupergravityMalcevmagicsquareR-fluxmagnetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review-style paper argues that the exceptional Jordan algebra, the algebra of 3 by 3 Hermitian matrices over the octonions, is the algebraic backbone of some of the most symmetric known theories of gravity and matter. The author claims that this algebra, which is the only finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebra that cannot be realized as operators on a Hilbert space, uniquely determines the exceptional N=2 supergravity theory, and that the same algebra over split octonions underlies the maximal N=8 supergravity. The paper further claims that the non-associative algebra appearing in string theory for a constant H-field is isomorphic to the magnetic algebra describing an electron in a constant magnetic charge distribution, and that the M-theory uplift of the string R-flux algebra is the seven-dimensional Malcev algebra of imaginary octonions. A sympathetic reader would care because these claims connect the single truly exceptional algebraic structure of quantum mechanics to concrete physical theories and suggest that non-associativity, not just non-commutativity, may be a genuine feature of a fundamental theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the exceptional Jordan algebra $J_3^O$ of $3\times 3$ Hermitian matrices over the octonions, the unique finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebra with no realization in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. Its cubic norm $N_3$ defines the completely symmetric C-tensor that fixes the vector couplings of the five-dimensional exceptional supergravity; the same construction over split octonions gives the C-tensor of maximal supergravity. The companion mechanism is the seven-dimensional Malcev algebra formed by the imaginary octonions under the antisymmetric product, a generalization of a Lie algebra in which the Jacobi identity is replaced by the Malcev identity; its contraction yields the magnetic algebra of an electron in a constant magnetic charge distribution, and its uncontracted form is proposed as the M-theory R-flux algebra.

What would settle it

Construct or identify a non-geometric M-theory R-flux background in which all momentum modes are present, so the phase space is even-dimensional, and compute the Jacobiator of its coordinates and momenta; if the result does not match the structure constants of the seven-dimensional imaginary-octonion Malcev algebra under any rescaling, the uplift claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that exceptional and non-associative algebraic structures are not mathematical accidents but organizing principles of certain supergravity and string theories. Specifically, the exceptional Jordan algebra over the division algebra of octonions determines, through its cubic norm and C-tensor, the exceptional N=2 supergravity in five dimensions, while the exceptional Jordan algebra over split octonions supplies the cubic norm underlying the maximal N=8 supergravity; in four and three dimensions these theories have the corresponding exceptional U-duality groups $E_{7(-25)}$, $E_{8(-24)}$ and $E_{7(7)}$, $E_{8(8)}$. The paper also claims that the non-associative algebra arising from a constant H-field in closed string theory is isomorphic to the magnetic algebra of Gunaydin and Zumino, and that the uncontracted Malcev algebra generated by the seven imaginary octonion units describes the uplift of the string R-flux algebra to M-theory, with the four coordinates and three momenta of a non-geometric toy model identified with the seven imaginary octonions.

Load-bearing premise

The M-theory uplift claim rests on a four-dimensional toy model of a non-geometric background that loses one momentum mode, giving a seven-dimensional phase space; if real M-theory backgrounds generally keep all momentum modes, the identification of the uplifted R-flux algebra with the octonionic Malcev algebra fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The exceptional N=2 supergravity cannot be embedded in a larger N=2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theory without breaking its global symmetry, because the exceptional Jordan algebra cannot be embedded in a larger Jordan algebra.
  • Closed-string backgrounds with constant H-field carry exactly the same non-associative structure as an electron in a constant magnetic charge distribution, so string-theoretic non-associativity is the magnetic algebra in disguise.
  • If the octonionic Malcev algebra is the M-theory uplift of the R-flux algebra, then non-geometric M-theory backgrounds of this type have a seven-dimensional phase space with one missing momentum mode.
  • The exceptional Jordan superalgebra $F(6|4)$ defines a ten-dimensional exceptional superspace whose superconformal symmetry is the five-dimensional superconformal algebra $F(4)$, and this superspace cannot be embedded in any higher-dimensional superconformal superspace.
  • Treating non-associativity as a special form of non-linearity makes string theory with a fundamental length a realization of Stueckelberg's proposed non-linear quantum mechanics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the toy model's missing momentum mode is generic, one should find further M-theory backgrounds with an odd-dimensional phase space; a systematic scan of twisted tori and T-folds would be a direct test of the octonionic uplift proposal.
  • The paper's uniqueness results suggest that any attempt to build a unified theory on a larger Jordan or Malcev algebra would fail in the same way octonionic quantum mechanics cannot be extended to more than two octonionic degrees of freedom; this constrains model building beyond what the text states.
  • One could probe the isomorphism between R-flux and magnetic algebras by quantizing the closed-string sector and checking whether the three-cocycle or non-associative phase reproduces the Dirac quantization condition for magnetic charge.
  • The characteristic-3 and characteristic-5 superalgebras reviewed in the appendix, if physically realized, would imply that finite-field extensions, not just the real or complex forms, might play a role in discrete or modular formulations of quantum theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper is an expanded write-up of a 2015 CERN memorial talk for Bruno Zumino. It surveys the appearance of exceptional Jordan algebras, octonions, and non-associative algebras across quantum mechanics, supergravity, and string/M-theory: the Jordan formulation of quantum mechanics, octonionic quantum mechanics over the Albert algebra J3^O, the role of Jordan algebras of degree three in the magical N=2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories, the exceptional Jordan superalgebra and the exceptional superspace, the Gunaydin–Zumino magnetic algebra and its isomorphism with the non-associative algebra of closed-string R-flux backgrounds, and the proposed uplift of the R-flux algebra to M-theory via the seven‑dimensional Malcev algebra of imaginary octonions. The central assertion, stated in Section 14, is that the exceptional Jordan algebra over the division algebra of octonions uniquely determines the exceptional N=2 supergravity, while the split exceptional Jordan algebra underlies the maximal N=8 supergravity.

Significance. The manuscript is a personal, historically rich review written by one of the main contributors to the subject. Its value lies in organizing and connecting results from a large literature and in providing a single narrative for the appearance of exceptional and non-associative structures in physics. The paper explicitly attributes results to original sources ([46–49], [111], [2]) rather than claiming new derivations, and it is candid about open problems, such as the absence of a Calabi–Yau compactification that yields the exceptional supergravity and the toy-model status of the M-theory R-flux identification. These are strengths. However, the paper's advertised conclusion that 'exceptionality prevents extension' is supported by an incorrect statement about Zelmanov's theorem, which needs correction before the survey can be relied upon.

major comments (3)
  1. [§9] The statement in Section 3 (page 7) that 'Zelmanov showed that there are no infinite dimensional exceptional Jordan algebras' is false as written, and Section 14 repeats it as the reason why octonionic quantum mechanics cannot be embedded in a higher-dimensional quantum mechanics. The coordinatewise direct product of countably many copies of the 27-dimensional Albert algebra H3(O) is an infinite-dimensional Euclidean Jordan algebra under the paper's own definition in footnote 1 (the formal-reality condition X^2+Y^2=0 implies X=Y=0 holds componentwise), and it is exceptional because it contains H3(O) as a subalgebra; a subalgebra of a special Jordan algebra would be special. Zelmanov's theorem classifies prime nondegenerate Jordan algebras: every such algebra is either special or an Albert algebra. It does not exclude infinite-dimensional non-prime exceptional Jordan algebras. Please replace the statement with a correct one (e.g., no infinite-dimensional simple, or prime, exceptional Jordan algebras) and either re-derive or explicitly weaken the non-embeddability conclusion in Section 14.
  2. [§13 and §14] Section 9 (page 24) states that 'the exceptional supergravity can not be embedded in a larger N=2 MESGT without breaking its global symmetry group' and that 'this follows from the fact that exceptional Jordan algebra that defines the exceptional supergravity can not be embedded in a larger Jordan algebra.' The second statement is false in the literal sense: J3^O embeds unitally into the infinite direct product of countably many copies of itself, which is a Euclidean Jordan algebra. The intended claim must be about embedding into a larger simple Jordan algebra of degree three, or about extending the C-tensor while preserving the simple duality group E6(-26). Please state the precise mathematical claim and supply a proof or a precise reference.
  3. [§10.1] The identification of the M-theory R-flux algebra with the simple Malcev algebra of imaginary octonions (Section 13, Eqs. 13.4–13.5) rests on a four-dimensional toy model with a missing momentum mode, as the paper explicitly notes. This is acceptable for a proposal, and the reference to [111] is appropriate. However, Section 14 concludes that 'these backgrounds admit extensions to M-theory,' which overstates the status of a toy-model-based conjecture. Please mark this conclusion explicitly as conjectural and note that the representative-ness of the toy model is not established.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§8] In Section 10.1, page 25, the list of generalized spacetimes has a fourth entry labelled 'J C 3'; it should be 'J O 3', the Jordan algebra of 3x3 Hermitian matrices over the octonions.
  2. [§8] There are several typos, e.g., 'unified aproach' should be 'unified approach' (page 21) and 'introduced aand studied' should be 'introduced and studied' (page 19).
  3. [§2] Footnote 1 defines 'Euclidean Jordan algebra' only by the formal-reality condition, omitting the usual finite-dimensionality assumption. Since the discussion in Section 3 turns on infinite-dimensional algebras, this ambiguity contributes to the misstatement discussed in the first major comment; it would help to clarify the definition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a survey of prior published results, and its proposals are explicitly labeled as such.

full rationale

This paper is a review/talk write-up rather than a new derivation chain. Its load-bearing statements, such as the uniqueness of the C-tensor determining 5d N=2 MESGTs (Section 7), the construction of exceptional supergravity from the exceptional Jordan algebra (Section 9), and the isomorphism between the string-theory nonassociative algebra and the Gunaydin-Zumino magnetic algebra (Section 12), are presented as summaries of previously published work, including the author's own papers. Those earlier papers contain independent constructions and proofs, so citing them in a survey does not create a circular reduction within this manuscript. The M-theory uplift in Section 13 is explicitly introduced as a proposal based on a toy model, and the paper states that it 'conjectured' the strong-coupling behavior; the identification of the 7-dimensional phase space with imaginary octonions is an openly constructed ansatz, not a prediction disguised as a derivation. Statements such as 'Whether one can construct the five dimensional N=8 supergravity starting from the C-tensor ... is an interesting open problem' and 'whether the intersection numbers of any of these threefolds coincide with the C-tensor ... is currently beyond the available computational tools' further show that unsupported or conjectural items are flagged rather than presented as forced results. The Section 3 statement about Zelmanov's theorem may be mathematically overbroad and is a correctness concern, but it is an external mathematical citation rather than a self-referential or definitional loop; under the given rubric, that does not constitute circularity. No step in the paper's survey reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the pervasive self-citation is genre-appropriate for an author reviewing his own research area. Score 0 is therefore the honest finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard mathematical classifications (JvNW, Kac, Zelmanov) and established supergravity constructions; the only ad hoc assumption introduced in this paper is the toy model used for the M-theory uplift of the R-flux algebra (Section 13). No data fitting is performed; lambda and N are model parameters, not fit constants.

free parameters (2)
  • lambda
    Deformation parameter in the M-theory R-flux algebra (Section 13, Eq. 13.4); chosen by hand, with lambda->0 reducing to string R-flux algebra. It is not fitted to data but is an ad hoc parameter of the model.
  • N
    Flux normalization in R4,alpha,beta,gamma,delta = N epsilon_alpha,beta,gamma,delta (Section 13); an integer background parameter required for the octonionic identification, not fitted to data.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Jordan-von Neumann-Wigner classification of finite-dimensional simple Euclidean Jordan algebras
    Used in Sections 2-4 to identify J O 3 as the unique exceptional finite-dimensional Jordan algebra.
  • standard math Tits-Kantor-Koecher constructions and Freudenthal Magic Square
    Underpins the tables of exceptional groups and magical supergravities (Sections 4, 6.1, 7).
  • standard math Kac classification of simple Jordan superalgebras including exceptional JF(6/4)
    Used in Section 10.3 to define the exceptional superspace and its symmetry superalgebras.
  • domain assumption N=2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories are uniquely determined by the C-tensor and Jordan algebras of degree three
    Basis for Section 7's classification of magical supergravities; this is a physics result from [46-50], treated as input.
  • standard math Zelmanov's theorem that no infinite-dimensional exceptional Jordan algebras exist
    Underlies the claim in Sections 3 and 9 that octonionic QM and exceptional supergravity cannot be embedded in higher-dimensional structures.
  • ad hoc to paper The four-dimensional toy model with a missing momentum mode represents generic non-geometric M-theory R-flux backgrounds
    Introduced in Section 13 to support the octonionic Malcev uplift; it is a conjecture, not a proven general result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exceptionality, Supersymmetry and Non-associativity in Physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LLCPLDY2

@misc{pith2026250717938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exceptionality, Supersymmetry and Non-associativity in Physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LLCPLDY2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17938}
}
read the original abstract

This is an expanded and updated version of the talk I gave at the meeting organized at CERN on April 27-28, 2015 dedicated to honoring the memory of Bruno Zumino and his legacy. In this talk I review the emergence of exceptional structures and non-associative algebras in quantum mechanics, supergravity and M/superstring theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [111]

    Non-associativity in non-geometric string and M-theory backgrounds, the algebra of octonions, and missing momentum modes

    M. G¨ unaydin, D. L¨ ust and E. Malek, “Non-associativity in non-geometric string and M-theory backgrounds, the algebra of octonions, and missing momentum modes,” JHEP 11, 027 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)027 [arXiv:1607.06474 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    G¨ unaydin and B

    M. G¨ unaydin and B. Zumino,Magnetic Charge and Non-Associative Algebras , in Old and New Problems in Fundamental Physics : Symposium in Honour of G.C. Wick, Scuola Normale Superiore Publication (Quaderni), Pisa 1986, pp. 43-54, R.L. Cool, M. Jacob , E. Picasso and L.A.Radicati, eds . KISS Preprint No: 198504333. http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/produc...

    1986

  3. [1]

    Supersymmetry and Noncompact Groups in Supergravity,

    J. R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, M. G¨ unaydin, and B. Zumino, “Supersymmetry and Noncompact Groups in Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 224 (1983) 427–450

    1983

  4. [3]

    Charge Orbits of Extremal Black Holes in Five Dimensional Supergravity

    B. L. Cerchiai, S. Ferrara, A. Marrani and B. Zumino, “Charge Orbits of Extremal Black Holes in Five Dimensional Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 085010 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.085010 [arXiv:1006.3101 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  5. [4]

    Jordan Pairs, E6 and U-Duality in Five Dimensions,

    S. Ferrara, A. Marrani and B. Zumino, “Jordan Pairs, E6 and U-Duality in Five Dimensions,” J. Phys. A 46, 065402 (2013) doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/6/065402 [arXiv:1208.0347 [math-ph]]

    arXiv 2013

  6. [5]

    Freudenthal Gauge Theory,

    A. Marrani, C. X. Qiu, S. Y. D. Shih, A. Tagliaferro and B. Zumino, “Freudenthal Gauge Theory,” JHEP 03, 132 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)132 [arXiv:1208.0013 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [6]

    Uber die Multiplikation quantenmechanischer Groessen,

    P. Jordan, “Uber die Multiplikation quantenmechanischer Groessen,” Zeitschrift fuer Physik 80 (1933) 285

    1933

  8. [7]

    von Neumann, Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics

    J. von Neumann, Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics . Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1996. Translated from the German and with a preface by Robert T. Beyer, Twelfth printing, Princeton Paperbacks

    1996

Show all 120 references
  1. [8]

    On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism,

    P. Jordan, J. von Neumann, and E. P. Wigner, “On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism,” Annals Math. 35 (1934) 29–64

    1934

  2. [9]

    Moufang Plane and Octonionic Quantum Mechanics,

    M. G¨ unaydin, C. Piron, and H. Ruegg, “Moufang Plane and Octonionic Quantum Mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys. 61 (1978) 69

    1978

  3. [10]

    Quadratic Jordan Formulation Of Quantum Mechanics And Construction Of Lie (Super)Algebras From Jordan (Super)Algebras,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Quadratic Jordan Formulation Of Quantum Mechanics And Construction Of Lie (Super)Algebras From Jordan (Super)Algebras,” in Proceedings of the 8th Int. Colloq. on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Kiriat Anavim, Israel, Mar 25-29, 1979 , Annals of the Israel...

    1980

  4. [11]

    On an exceptional nonassociative superspace,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “On an exceptional nonassociative superspace,” J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 1776–1782

    1990

  5. [12]

    The exceptional superspace and the quadratic Jordan formulation of quantum mechanics,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “The exceptional superspace and the quadratic Jordan formulation of quantum mechanics,” in Elementary Particles and the Universe: Essays in Honor of – 40 – Murray Gell-Mann, Cambridge University Press (1991), pp. 99-120, John H. Schwarz, editor

    1991

  6. [13]

    Prime Jordan algebras. II,

    E. I. Zel′manov, “Prime Jordan algebras. II,” Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 24 no. 1, (1983) 89–104, 192

    1983

  7. [14]

    Jordan division algebras,

    E. I. Zel′manov, “Jordan division algebras,” Algebra i Logika 18 no. 3, (1979) 286–310, 385

    1979

  8. [15]

    Primary Jordan algebras,

    E. I. Zel′manov, “Primary Jordan algebras,” Algebra i Logika 18 no. 2, (1979) 162–175, 253

    1979

  9. [16]

    The Russian revolution in Jordan algebras,

    K. McCrimmon, “The Russian revolution in Jordan algebras,” Algebras Groups Geom. 1 no. 1, (1984) 1–61

    1984

  10. [17]

    Lie groups in the foundations of geometry,

    H. Freudenthal, “Lie groups in the foundations of geometry,” Advances in Math. 1 no. fasc. 2, (1964) 145–190

    1964

  11. [18]

    Une classe d’alg` ebres de Lie en relation avec les alg` ebres de Jordan,

    J. Tits, “Une classe d’alg` ebres de Lie en relation avec les alg` ebres de Jordan,”Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 65 = Indag. Math. 24 (1962) 530–535

    1962

  12. [19]

    Tits, Alg` ebres alternatives, alg` ebres de Jordan et alg` ebres de Lie exceptionnelles

    J. Tits, Alg` ebres alternatives, alg` ebres de Jordan et alg` ebres de Lie exceptionnelles. I. Construction, Indag. Math. 28 (1966), 223–237

    1966

  13. [20]

    Algebres alternatives, algebres de Jordan et algebres de Lie exceptionelles,

    J. Tits, “Algebres alternatives, algebres de Jordan et algebres de Lie exceptionelles,” Mimeographed Notes, Universsit´ e libre de Bruxelles and Institute for Advanced Study

  14. [21]

    Color Quarks, Octonions and the Poincar´ e Group,

    M. G¨ unaydin , “Color Quarks, Octonions and the Poincar´ e Group,” Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University , 1973

    1973

  15. [22]

    Quark structure and octonions,

    M. G¨ unaydin and F. G¨ ursey, “Quark structure and octonions,”J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973) 1651–1667

    1973

  16. [23]

    Quark Statistics and Octonions,

    M. G¨ unaydin and F. G¨ ursey, “Quark Statistics and Octonions,”Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 3387

    1974

  17. [24]

    Octonionic Hilbert Spaces, the Poincare Group and SU(3),

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Octonionic Hilbert Spaces, the Poincare Group and SU(3),” J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976) 1875

    1976

  18. [25]

    Gell-Mann, “Quarks,” Acta Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, “Quarks,” Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl. 9 (1972) 733–761

    1972

  19. [26]

    A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,

    F. G¨ ursey, P. Ramond, and P. Sikivie, “A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,” Phys. Lett. B60 (1976) 177

    1976

  20. [27]

    E7 as a Universal Gauge Group,

    F. G¨ ursey and P. Sikivie, “E7 as a Universal Gauge Group,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 775

    1976

  21. [28]

    Unified Theory of Strong, Electromagnetic, and Weak Interactions Based on the Vector-Like Group E7,

    P. Ramond, “Unified Theory of Strong, Electromagnetic, and Weak Interactions Based on the Vector-Like Group E7,” Nucl. Phys. B 110 (1976) 214–228

    1976

  22. [29]

    Grand Unification With the Exceptional Group E8,

    I. Bars and M. G¨ unaydin, “Grand Unification With the Exceptional Group E8,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 859. – 41 –

    1980

  23. [30]

    The Heterotic String,

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm, “The Heterotic String,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 502–505

    1985

  24. [31]

    Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B70 (1974) 39–50

    1974

  25. [32]

    Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity,

    D. Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and S. Ferrara, “Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 3214–3218

    1976

  26. [33]

    Consistent Supergravity,

    S. Deser and B. Zumino, “Consistent Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 62 (1976) 335

    1976

  27. [34]

    Exceptional realizations of Lorentz group: Supersymmetries and leptons,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Exceptional realizations of Lorentz group: Supersymmetries and leptons,” Nuovo Cim. A29 (1975) 467

    1975

  28. [35]

    Classification of simple Z-graded Lie superalgebras and simple Jordan superalgebras,

    V. G. Kac, “Classification of simple Z-graded Lie superalgebras and simple Jordan superalgebras,” Comm. Algebra 5 no. 13, (1977) 1375–1400

    1977

  29. [36]

    Models of the exceptional Lie algebras,

    I. L. Kantor, “Models of the exceptional Lie algebras,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 208 (1973) 1276–1279

    1973

  30. [37]

    Construction of Lie Algebras and Lie Superalgebras From Ternary Algebras,

    I. Bars and M. G¨ unaydin, “Construction of Lie Algebras and Lie Superalgebras From Ternary Algebras,” J. Math. Phys. 20 (1979) 1977

    1979

  31. [38]

    Three-algebras, triple systems and 3-graded Lie superalgebras,

    J. Palmkvist, “Three-algebras, triple systems and 3-graded Lie superalgebras,” J. Phys. A43 (2010) 015205, arXiv:0905.2468 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Octonionic description of exceptional Lie superalgebras ,

    A. Sudbery, “Octonionic description of exceptional Lie superalgebras ,” J. Math. Phys. 24 (1983) 1986–1988

    1983

  33. [40]

    Construction of Lie superalgebras D(2, 1;α), G(3) and F (4) from some triple systems,

    N. Kamiya and S. Okubo, “Construction of Lie superalgebras D(2, 1;α), G(3) and F (4) from some triple systems,” Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 46 no. 1, (2003) 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0013091501000876

    2003 doi

  34. [41]

    The N = 8 supergravity theory. 1. The Lagrangian,

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia, “The N = 8 supergravity theory. 1. The Lagrangian,” Phys. Lett. B80 (1978) 48

    1978

  35. [42]

    The SO(8) Supergravity,

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia, “The SO(8) Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 159 (1979) 141–212

    1979

  36. [43]

    Supersymmetry and Kahler Manifolds,

    B. Zumino, “Supersymmetry and Kahler Manifolds,” Phys. Lett. B 87 (1979) 203

    1979

  37. [44]

    Geometrical Structure and Ultraviolet Finiteness in the Supersymmetric Sigma Model,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and D. Z. Freedman, “Geometrical Structure and Ultraviolet Finiteness in the Supersymmetric Sigma Model,” Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981) 443

    1981

  38. [45]

    Matter Couplings in N=2 Supergravity,

    J. Bagger and E. Witten, “Matter Couplings in N=2 Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 1–10

    1983

  39. [46]

    Exceptional supergravity theories and the magic square,

    M. G¨ unaydin, G. Sierra, and P. K. Townsend, “Exceptional supergravity theories and the magic square,” Phys. Lett. B133 (1983) 72

    1983

  40. [47]

    The geometry of N= 2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity and Jordan algebras,

    M. G¨ unaydin, G. Sierra, and P. K. Townsend, “The geometry of N= 2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity and Jordan algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B242 (1984) 244. – 42 –

    1984

  41. [48]

    Gauging thed = 5 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories: more on Jordan algebras,

    M. G¨ unaydin, G. Sierra, and P. K. Townsend, “Gauging thed = 5 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories: more on Jordan algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B253 (1985) 573

    1985

  42. [49]

    More on d=5 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity: symmetric spaces and kinks,

    M. G¨ unaydin, G. Sierra, and P. K. Townsend, “More on d=5 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity: symmetric spaces and kinks,” Class. Quant. Grav. 3 (1986) 763

    1986

  43. [50]

    The N=2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories and their compact and non-compact gaugings ,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “The N=2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories and their compact and non-compact gaugings ,” Conf. Proc. C 841031 Proc. of the Santa Fe Meeting of American Physical Society, ed. by W. Goldman and M. M. Nieto, World Scientific, Philadelphia, p. 420-423 (1985)

    1985

  44. [51]

    Lauria and A

    E. Lauria and A. Van Proeyen, N = 2 Supergravity inD = 4, 5, 6 Dimensions, vol. 966. 3, 2020. arXiv:2004.11433 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Compactification of D = 11 supergravity on spaces of exceptional holonomy,

    G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend, “Compactification of D = 11 supergravity on spaces of exceptional holonomy,” Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 300–306, arXiv:hep-th/9506150

    1995 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on Calabi-Yau threefolds,

    A. C. Cadavid, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, and S. Ferrara, “Eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on Calabi-Yau threefolds,” Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 76–80, arXiv:hep-th/9506144

    1995 arXiv

  47. [54]

    M theory on a Calabi-Yau manifold,

    S. Ferrara, R. R. Khuri, and R. Minasian, “M theory on a Calabi-Yau manifold,” Phys. Lett. B 375 (1996) 81–88, arXiv:hep-th/9602102

    1996 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Unified Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills-Einstein supergravity theories in five-dimensions,

    M. G¨ unaydin and M. Zagermann, “Unified Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills-Einstein supergravity theories in five-dimensions,” JHEP 07 (2003) 023, arXiv:hep-th/0304109 [hep-th]

    2003 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Orbits of exceptional groups, duality and BPS states in string theory,

    S. Ferrara and M. G¨ unaydin, “Orbits of exceptional groups, duality and BPS states in string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13 (1998) 2075–2088, hep-th/9708025

    1998 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Conformal and quasiconformal realizations of exceptional Lie groups,

    M. G¨ unaydin, K. Koepsell, and H. Nicolai, “Conformal and quasiconformal realizations of exceptional Lie groups,” Commun. Math. Phys. 221 (2001) 57–76, hep-th/0008063

    2001 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Generalized spacetimes defined by cubic forms and the minimal unitary realizations of their quasiconformal groups,

    M. G¨ unaydin and O. Pavlyk, “Generalized spacetimes defined by cubic forms and the minimal unitary realizations of their quasiconformal groups,” JHEP 08 (2005) 101, hep-th/0506010

    2005 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Realizations of exceptional U-duality groups as conformal and quasiconformal groups and their minimal unitary representations,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Realizations of exceptional U-duality groups as conformal and quasiconformal groups and their minimal unitary representations,” Comment. Phys. Math. Soc. Sci. Fenn. 166 (2004) 111–125, arXiv:hep-th/0409263

    2004 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Unitary realizations of U-duality groups as conformal and quasiconformal groups and extremal black holes of supergravity theories,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Unitary realizations of U-duality groups as conformal and quasiconformal groups and extremal black holes of supergravity theories,” AIP Conf. Proc. 767 no. 1, (2005) 268–287, arXiv:hep-th/0502235

    2005 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Octonionic Magical Supergravity, Niemeier Lattices, – 43 – and Exceptional & Hilbert Modular Forms,

    M. G¨ unaydin and A. Kidambi, “Octonionic Magical Supergravity, Niemeier Lattices, – 43 – and Exceptional & Hilbert Modular Forms,” Fortsch. Phys. 72 no. 2, (2024) 2300242, arXiv:2209.05004 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [62]

    The exceptional cone and the Leech lattice,

    N. D. Elkies and B. H. Gross, “The exceptional cone and the Leech lattice,” Internat. Math. Res. Notices (1996), no. 14, 665–698

    1996

  56. [63]

    Cubic rings and the exceptional Jordan algebra,

    N. D. Elkies and B. H. Gross, “Cubic rings and the exceptional Jordan algebra,” Duke Math. J. 109 (2001), no. 2, 383–409

    2001

  57. [64]

    Exceptional modular form of weight 4 on an exceptional domain contained in C27,

    H. H. Kim, “Exceptional modular form of weight 4 on an exceptional domain contained in C27,” Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 9 (1993), no. 1, 139–200

    1993

  58. [65]

    The singular modular forms on the 27-dimensional exceptional domain,

    A. Krieg, “The singular modular forms on the 27-dimensional exceptional domain,” Manuscripta Math. 92 (1997), no. 3, 361–367

    1997

  59. [66]

    The theory of Jacobi forms over the Cayley numbers,

    M. Eie and A. Krieg, “The theory of Jacobi forms over the Cayley numbers,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 342 (1994), no. 2, 793–805

    1994

  60. [67]

    Eie, Topics in number theory, vol

    M. Eie, Topics in number theory, vol. 2 of Monographs in Number Theory. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2009

    2009

  61. [68]

    Orbits and Attractors for N=2 Maxwell-Einstein Supergravity Theories in Five Dimensions,

    S. Ferrara and M. G¨ unaydin, “Orbits and Attractors for N=2 Maxwell-Einstein Supergravity Theories in Five Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 759, 1-19 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.09.016 [arXiv:hep-th/0606108 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  62. [69]

    The minimal unitary representation of E8(8),

    M. G¨ unaydin, K. Koepsell, and H. Nicolai, “The minimal unitary representation of E8(8),” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 5 (2002) 923–946, hep-th/0109005

    2002 arXiv

  63. [70]

    A unified approach to the minimal unitary realizations of noncompact groups and supergroups,

    M. G¨ unaydin and O. Pavlyk, “A unified approach to the minimal unitary realizations of noncompact groups and supergroups,” JHEP 09 (2006) 050, hep-th/0604077

    2006 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Minimal unitary representation of SO*(8) = SO(6,2) and its SU(2) deformations as massless 6D conformal fields and their supersymmetric extensions,

    S. Fernando and M. G¨ unaydin, “Minimal unitary representation of SO*(8) = SO(6,2) and its SU(2) deformations as massless 6D conformal fields and their supersymmetric extensions,” Nucl.Phys. B841 (2010) 339–387, arXiv:1005.3580 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Minimal unitary representation of SU(2,2) and its deformations as massless conformal fields and their supersymmetric extensions,

    S. Fernando and M. G¨ unaydin, “Minimal unitary representation of SU(2,2) and its deformations as massless conformal fields and their supersymmetric extensions,” J.Math.Phys. 51 (2010) 082301, arXiv:0908.3624 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Minimal unitary representation of 5d superconformal algebra F (4) and AdS6/CFT 5 higher spin (super)-algebras,

    S. Fernando and M. G¨ unaydin, “Minimal unitary representation of 5d superconformal algebra F (4) and AdS6/CFT 5 higher spin (super)-algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B890 (2014) 570–605, arXiv:1409.2185 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  67. [74]

    B. H. Gross and N. R. Wallach, On quaternionic discrete series representations, and their continuations, J. Reine Angew. Math. 481 (1996), 73–123; MR1421947

    1996

  68. [75]

    Quasi-conformal actions, quaternionic discrete series and twistors: SU (2,1) and G2(2),

    M. G¨ unaydin, A. Neitzke, O. Pavlyk and B. Pioline, “Quasi-conformal actions, quaternionic discrete series and twistors: SU (2,1) and G2(2),” Commun. Math. Phys. 283, 169-226 (2008) doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0563-9 [arXiv:0707.1669 [hep-th]]. – 44 –

    2008 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Spectrum Generating Conformal and Quasiconformal U-Duality Groups, Supergravity and Spherical Vectors,

    M. G¨ unaydin and O. Pavlyk, “Spectrum Generating Conformal and Quasiconformal U-Duality Groups, Supergravity and Spherical Vectors,” JHEP 04, 070 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2010)070 [arXiv:0901.1646 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [77]

    BPS black holes, quantum attractor flows and automorphic forms,

    M. G¨ unaydin, A. Neitzke, B. Pioline, and A. Waldron, “BPS black holes, quantum attractor flows and automorphic forms,” Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 084019, hep-th/0512296

    2006 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Quantum Attractor Flows,

    M. G¨ unaydin, A. Neitzke, B. Pioline, and A. Waldron, “Quantum Attractor Flows,” JHEP 09 (2007) 056, 0707.0267

    2007 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Four-dimensional black holes from Kaluza-Klein theories,

    P. Breitenlohner, G. W. Gibbons, and D. Maison, “Four-dimensional black holes from Kaluza-Klein theories,” Commun. Math. Phys. 120 (1988) 295

    1988

  73. [80]

    An application of the theories of Jordan algebras and Freudenthal triple systems to particles and strings,

    G. Sierra, “An application of the theories of Jordan algebras and Freudenthal triple systems to particles and strings,” Class. Quant. Grav. 4 (1987) 227

    1987

  74. [81]

    Exceptional supergravity theories, Jordan algebras and the Magic Square,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Exceptional supergravity theories, Jordan algebras and the Magic Square,” CALT-68-1158 , invited talk in the Proccedings of 13th Int. Colloq. on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics , College Park, MD, May 21-25, 1984; ed. by Zachary, World Scientific (1984)

    1984

  75. [82]

    Lectures on Spectrum Generating Symmetries and U-duality in Supergravity, Extremal Black Holes, Quantum Attractors and Harmonic Superspace,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Lectures on Spectrum Generating Symmetries and U-duality in Supergravity, Extremal Black Holes, Quantum Attractors and Harmonic Superspace,” Springer Proc. Phys. 134, 31-84 (2010) doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10736-8 2 [arXiv:0908.0374 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Dual pairs of type II string compactification,

    A. Sen and C. Vafa, “Dual pairs of type II string compactification,” Nucl. Phys. B455 (1995) 165–187, arXiv:hep-th/9508064

    1995 arXiv

  77. [84]

    On the Magical Supergravities in Six Dimensions,

    M. G¨ unaydin, H. Samtleben, and E. Sezgin, “On the Magical Supergravities in Six Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B848 (2011) 62–89, arXiv:1012.1818 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Second quantized mirror symmetry,

    S. Ferrara, J. A. Harvey, A. Strominger, and C. Vafa, “Second quantized mirror symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B361 (1995) 59–65, arXiv:hep-th/9505162

    1995 arXiv

  79. [86]

    ATTEMPTS AT SUPERUNIFICATION,

    J. R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, L. Maiani, and B. Zumino, “ATTEMPTS AT SUPERUNIFICATION,” in International Symposium on Fundamentals of Quantum Statistics and Quantum Theory, particularly Density Matrix Formalism . 4, 1980

    1980

  80. [87]

    Bosonic Construction of the Lie Algebras of Some Noncompact Groups Appearing in Supergravity Theories and Their Oscillator Like Unitary Representations,

    M. G¨ unaydin and C. Saclioglu, “Bosonic Construction of the Lie Algebras of Some Noncompact Groups Appearing in Supergravity Theories and Their Oscillator Like Unitary Representations,” Phys. Lett. B 108, 180-186 (1982) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91170-4

    1982 doi

  81. [88]

    Oscillator-Like Unitary Representations Of Non-Compact Groups And – 45 – Supergroups And Extended Supergravity Theories,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Oscillator-Like Unitary Representations Of Non-Compact Groups And – 45 – Supergroups And Extended Supergravity Theories,” Lect. Notes Phys. 180, 192-213 (Springer Verlag, 1983)

    1983

  82. [89]

    Oscillator Like Unitary Representations of Noncompact Groups With a Jordan Structure and the Noncompact Groups of Supergravity,

    M. G¨ unaydin and C. Saclioglu, “Oscillator Like Unitary Representations of Noncompact Groups With a Jordan Structure and the Noncompact Groups of Supergravity,” Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 159 (1982) doi:10.1007/BF01218560

    1982 doi

  83. [90]

    Massless conformal fields in ten dimensions, minimal unitary representation of E7(−25) and exceptional supergravity,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Massless conformal fields in ten dimensions, minimal unitary representation of E7(−25) and exceptional supergravity,” J. Phys. A 58, no.10, 105201 (2025) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adb91d [arXiv:2411.04049 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  84. [91]

    When is the Fourier transform of an elementary function elementary?,

    P. Etingof, D. Kazhdan, and A. Polishchuk, “When is the Fourier transform of an elementary function elementary?,” Selecta Math. (N.S.) 8 no. 1, (2002) 27–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00029-002-8101-7

    2002 doi

  85. [92]

    Simple space-time symmetries: Generalizing conformal field theory,

    G. Mack and M. de Riese, “Simple space-time symmetries: Generalizing conformal field theory,” arXiv:hep-th/0410277

    arXiv

  86. [93]

    Generalized conformal and superconformal group actions and Jordan algebras,

    M. G¨ unaydin, “Generalized conformal and superconformal group actions and Jordan algebras,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A8 (1993) 1407–1416, hep-th/9301050

    1993 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Supersymmetries and Their Representations,

    W. Nahm, “Supersymmetries and Their Representations,” Nucl. Phys. B 135, 149 (1978) doi:10.1201/9781482268737-2

    1978 doi

  88. [95]

    ExceptionalF (4) higher-spin theory in AdS6 at one-loop and other tests of duality,

    M. G¨ unaydin, E. D. Skvortsov and T. Tran, “ExceptionalF (4) higher-spin theory in AdS6 at one-loop and other tests of duality,” JHEP 11, 168 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)168 [arXiv:1608.07582 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Magnetic charge quantization and angular momentum,

    H. J. Lipkin, W. I. Weisberger and M. Peshkin, “Magnetic charge quantization and angular momentum,” Annals Phys. 53, 203-214 (1969) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(69)90279-6

    1969 doi

  90. [97]

    A Three Cocycle in Quantum Mechanics,

    B. Grossman, “A Three Cocycle in Quantum Mechanics,” Phys. Lett. B152 (1985) 93

    1985

  91. [98]

    3 - Cocycle in Mathematics and Physics,

    R. Jackiw, “3 - Cocycle in Mathematics and Physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 159–162

    1985

  92. [99]

    Absence of three cocycles in the Dirac monopole problem ,

    D. G. Boulware, S. Deser, and B. Zumino, “Absence of three cocycles in the Dirac monopole problem ,” Phys. Lett. B153 (1985) 307–310

    1985

  93. [100]

    Malcev, Math

    A. Malcev, Math. Sb. 78 (1955) 569

    1955

  94. [101]

    Sagle, Trans

    A.A. Sagle, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1961) 426

    1961

  95. [102]

    Kontsevich, Lett.Math.Phys

    M. Kontsevich, Lett.Math.Phys. 66 (2003) 157, q-alg/9709040

    2003 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Connes, M

    A. Connes, M. R. Douglas, and A. Schwarz, JHEP 9802 (1998) 003. For a review see, Douglas and Nekrasov, Rev.Mod.Phys. 73 (2001) 977, arXiv:hep-th/0106048

    1998 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, JHEP 9909 (1999) 032

    1999

  98. [105]

    Schomerus, JHEP 9906 (1999) 030

    V. Schomerus, JHEP 9906 (1999) 030. – 46 –

    1999

  99. [106]

    C.Chu and P.Ho Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 151; Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 447

    1999

  100. [107]

    Cornalba and R

    L. Cornalba and R. Schiappa, Commun.Math.Phys. 225 (2002) 33, hep-th/0101219

    2002 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Ho, JHEP 0111 (2001) 026, hep-th/0103024; P

    P.-M. Ho, JHEP 0111 (2001) 026, hep-th/0103024; P. Ho and Y. Yeh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 5523

    2001 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Nonassociativity, Malcev Algebras and String Theory,

    M. G¨ unaydin and D. Minic, “Nonassociativity, Malcev Algebras and String Theory,” Fortsch. Phys. 61, 873-892 (2013) doi:10.1002/prop.201300010 [arXiv:1304.0410 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  103. [110]

    L¨ ust, JHEP1012, 084 (2010) [arXiv:1010.1361 [hep-th]] ; R

    D. L¨ ust, JHEP1012, 084 (2010) [arXiv:1010.1361 [hep-th]] ; R. Blumenhagen, A. Deser, D. L¨ ust, E. Plauschinn, F. Rennecke, J. Phys.A 44 (2011) 385401, arXiv:1106.0316; R. Blumenhagen, E. Plauschinn, J.Phys. A44 (2011) 015401, arXiv:1010.1263; for reviews consult, D. L¨ ust,...

    2010 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Locally non-geometric fluxes and missing momenta in M-theory,

    D. L¨ ust, E. Malek and M. Syvari, “Locally non-geometric fluxes and missing momenta in M-theory,” JHEP 01, 050 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)050 [arXiv:1710.05919 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Exceptional Field Theory I: E6(6) covariant Form of M-Theory and Type IIB,

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, “Exceptional Field Theory I: E6(6) covariant Form of M-Theory and Type IIB,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.6, 066016 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.066016 [arXiv:1312.0614 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  106. [114]

    G. M. Benkart and E. I. Zel ′manov, Lie algebras graded by finite root systems and intersection matrix algebras, Invent. Math. 126 (1996), no. 1, 1–45; MR1408554

    1996

  107. [115]

    Elduque, Some new simple modular Lie superalgebras, Pacific J

    A. Elduque, Some new simple modular Lie superalgebras, Pacific J. Math. 231 (2007), no. 2, 337–359; MR2346500

    2007

  108. [116]

    Tits construction of the exceptional simple Lie algebras,

    A. Elduque, “Tits construction of the exceptional simple Lie algebras,” Pure Appl. Math. Q. 7 no. 3, Special Issue: In honor of Jacques Tits, (2011) 559–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/PAMQ.2011.v7.n3.a4

    2011 doi

  109. [117]

    Some new simple modular Lie superalgebras,

    A. Elduque, “Some new simple modular Lie superalgebras,” Pacific J. Math. 231 no. 2, (2007) 337–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2007.231.337

    2007 doi

  110. [118]

    An extended Freudenthal magic square in characteristic 3,

    I. Cunha and A. Elduque, “An extended Freudenthal magic square in characteristic 3,” J. Algebra 317 no. 2, (2007) 471–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.07.028

    2007 doi

  111. [119]

    St¨ uckelberg, Helv

    E.C.G. St¨ uckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta,33 (1960) 727, Annex 1. – 47 –

    1960

  112. [120]

    Rivier and E.C.G

    D. Rivier and E.C.G. St¨ uckelberg, ”Op´ erateurs non lin´ eaires en th´ eorie des quanta ”, Helv. phys. Acta 19, 239 (1946). – 48 –

    1946

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.