Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Wilsonian renormalisation group and thermal field theory in the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Wilsonian RG on the closed-time-path contour shows that thermal $\phi^4$ theory has two interacting fixed points in exactly $d=4$ spacetime dimensions, one a generalised Gaussian and one a generalised Wilson-Fisher fixed point, in the…

desk verdict Solid one-loop CTP RG derivation of dissipative couplings, but the claimed d=4 fixed points are conditional on a free regulator parameter and a reduced-space projection. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16441 v2 pith:LM3JW2UA submitted 2025-01-27 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech

Giorgio Frangi , Sašo Grozdanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mech MSC 81T1781T2882B28 PACS 11.10.Hi11.10.Wx05.70.Jk
keywords WilsonianrenormalisationgroupthermalfieldtheorySchwinger-Keldyshformalismphi^4pinching-polesingularitiesdissipativeeffectiveWilson-Fisherfixedpointcomplexpoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that applying the Wilsonian renormalisation group to the scalar $\phi^4$ theory at finite temperature, formulated on the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path contour, generates a dissipative effective action in which the two branches of the time contour interact through an influence-functional coupling. The authors then restrict attention to time-ordered correlators built from a single branch and define a reduced space of complex couplings, the mass squared and the quartic coupling. In that reduced space they find two interacting fixed points at exactly $d=4$ spacetime dimensions. One connects, as temperature is lowered, to the Gaussian fixed point, and the other to the epsilon-expansion Wilson-Fisher fixed point of the Euclidean $d=4-\epsilon$ theory. If the analysis is right, single-time-branch time-ordered correlators of the thermal CTP theory become scale invariant at complex couplings even though the full two-branch theory has no critical point.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the one-loop Wilsonian effective action on the CTP contour, $$S_{\rm eff}[\phi_1,\phi_2]=\int d^dx\left[\tfrac12(\partial\phi_1)^2-\tfrac12 $m^{2}$\$phi_1^{2}$-g\$phi_1^{4}$-\tfrac12(\partial\phi_2)^2+\tfrac12 $m^{2}$\$phi_2^{2}$+\bar g\$phi_2^{4}$+g_\times\$phi_1^{2}$\$phi_2^{2}$\right],$$ with couplings running in the scale $\zeta$. The pinching-pole divergence in the four-point function is regulated by replacing $\eta\to 2E_k\kappa g^2$ (Eq. (63)), which makes $g$ complex and generates $g_\times=2i\,\mathrm{Im}\,g$; this $\kappa$-dependent term enters the $\beta$-functions at $O(g^0)$ and is what produces the nontrivial fixed points. The reduced coupling space is the pair $(\tilde m^2,\tilde g)$ appearing in the Callan-Symanzik equation for single-branch correlators, where $\partial_{\bar g}$ and $\partial_{g_\times}$ act as zero; fixed points are simultaneous zeros of $\partial_s\tilde m^2$ and $\partial_s\tilde g$, and their linearisation gives complex scaling dimensions $\Delta_m,\Delta_g$.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop thermal self-energy to extract the width $\Gamma_k$: if $\Gamma_k$ is not of the form $2E_k\kappa g^2$ with momentum-independent finite $\kappa$, the fixed-point values in Eq. (100) will shift or disappear; equivalently, a two-loop single-branch four-point function whose finite part depends on $g_\times$ through internal lines would falsify the reduced-system closure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that, although the full one-loop CTP effective field theory for thermal $\phi^4$ has no interacting fixed points once the RG-generated cross-coupling $g_\times$ keeps running, a reduced system is critical. The reduction is to time-ordered correlators built from a single branch, say $\phi_1$, of the closed time path, so that the $\beta$-functions for $\bar g$ and $g_\times$ drop out of the Callan-Symanzik equation. In this two-dimensional complex space of $(\tilde m^2,\tilde g)$, the one-loop flow has two simultaneous zeros in exactly $d=4$ spacetime dimensions, located at low temperature at $\tilde m^2_* = 3(1-i)e^{-\tilde\beta/2}/(4\pi^2\tilde\kappa^{1/2})$, $\tilde g_* = (i-1)e^{-\tilde\beta/2}/\tilde\kappa^{1/2}$, and at the opposite points $(\tilde m^2_\circ,\tilde g_\circ) = -(\tilde m^2_*,\tilde g_*)$. In $d=4-\epsilon$, as the temperature is lowered the two branches connect respectively to the Gaussian fixed point and to the Wilson-Fisher fixed point of the Euclidean $\epsilon$-expansion; this motivates calling the $d=4$ branch a generalised Wilson-Fisher fixed point that exists for single-branch correlators at integer dimension.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on two premises: that the pinching-pole regulator can be replaced by a physical thermal width $\eta\to 2E_k\kappa g^2$ with $\kappa$ an unspecified constant (the $O(1)$ term in $\kappa^{-1}$ creates the $d=4$ fixed points), and that single-branch tree-level correlators form a closed subsystem even though the full EFT keeps running in $g_\times$ and $\bar g$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $d=4$, single-branch time-ordered correlators of the thermal CTP effective theory become scale invariant at the two complex reduced couplings $(\tilde m^2_*,\tilde g_*)$ and $(\tilde m^2_\circ,\tilde g_\circ)$, with the fixed-point values vanishing non-analytically as $e^{-\Lambda/T}$.
  • In $d=4-\epsilon$ at fixed low temperature, the two branches of fixed points separate: $(\tilde m^2_\circ,\tilde g_\circ)$ approaches the Wilson-Fisher point $(-\epsilon/3, 2\pi^2\epsilon/9)$ and $(\tilde m^2_*,\tilde g_*)$ approaches the Gaussian point as $T\to0$, which justifies calling the $d=4$ objects generalised Gaussian and Wilson-Fisher fixed points.
  • The one-loop effective action satisfies the unitarity constraints (76)-(78), so the dissipative coupling $g_\times$ is not arbitrary but fixed by $g_\times=2i\,\mathrm{Im}\,g$; on shell, $\phi_1=\phi_2$ and the imaginary parts cancel, leaving a real classical solution.
  • The RG-generated cross-coupling $g_\times$ between the two branches appears already at one loop despite being absent in the bare action, giving a concrete microscopic derivation of influence-functional EFTs used for dissipative hydrodynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not undertaken here is to compute $\kappa$ from the resummed one-loop self-energy; if the physical thermal width has a momentum or coupling dependence different from $2E_k\kappa g^2$, the fixed-point locations will shift and the $d=4$ statement will need revision.
  • The complex, exponentially small fixed-point couplings suggest these are not equilibrium critical points but rather transient scale-invariant regimes or critical points of an associated open system; the paper gestures at the open-QFT interpretation but does not develop it.
  • A natural check of the reduced-space closure is a two-loop calculation of a single-branch four-point function: if $g_\times$ enters through internal loops, the reduced Callan-Symanzik system is not closed and the fixed points would be an artifact of the one-loop truncation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a perturbative Wilsonian renormalisation-group treatment of scalar φ^4 theory at finite temperature in the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism. By integrating out spatial-momentum shells, the authors derive one-loop running equations for the mass and for the quartic couplings on both branches of the contour, including the generation of a complex cross-branch coupling g×. They verify that the resulting effective action satisfies the standard CTP unitarity constraints and then restrict their attention to a 'reduced space' of couplings that govern tree-level single-branch time-ordered correlators. In this projected space they find complex fixed points at d=4, one of which they connect, via the d=4−ε limit, to the Wilson-Fisher fixed point and the other to the Gaussian fixed point.

Significance. If the central fixed-point claim held, the paper would introduce a new notion of criticality for real-time thermal field theory in exactly d=4, and it would provide a microscopic example of the dissipative CTP effective actions proposed in the literature. The derivation of the beta functions and the explicit verification of the unitarity constraints are useful and carefully presented. The paper is also commendably transparent about its own limitations: it states that the full theory has no critical points, that the reduced space is a projection, and that the thermal-width parameter κ remains to be computed from the underlying QFT. However, these limitations are precisely what make the central claim conditional. The fixed points exist only in the projected subsystem and only for a specific ad hoc regularisation of pinching-pole singularities, with positions scaling as κ^{-1/2}. The significance is therefore real but not yet established at the level claimed in the abstract.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.B, Eq. (63), and Section IV, Eqs. (85)–(91), (100)] The existence and locations of the d=4 fixed points are controlled by the ad hoc replacement η → 2 E_k κ g^2 in Eq. (63). This replacement is the sole source of the O(g^0) terms in the beta functions (85)–(87), and the fixed-point values in Eq. (100) scale as κ^{-1/2}. Because κ is left as a free phenomenological constant, with its calculation listed as outstanding in Section V, the claimed fixed points are not shown to be properties of the underlying ϕ^4 theory: a physical thermal width Γ_k obtained from the imaginary part of the self-energy would generally be momentum- and temperature-dependent, so the pinching-pole integral would not reduce to Eq. (64) and the roots of ∂_s m^2 = ∂_s g = 0 could shift or disappear. I ask the authors to either compute κ from the microscopic theory or demonstrate that the fixed-point structure is stable under physically reasonable variations of the width profile. In addition, because the O(g^0) term is independent of g, the beta function ∂_s g is discontinuous at g=0; the Gaussian fixed point is obtained only by the separate argument that all loops vanish there. This discontinuity should be acknowledged and discussed explicitly, since it is part of the same regularisation issue.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (88) and the definition of the reduced space] The 'novel fixed points' are not fixed points of the full RG flow: by construction they satisfy only ∂_s m^2 = ∂_s g = 0, while ∂_s \bar g and ∂_s g× remain nonzero at these points. The Callan-Symanzik equation (88) closes on the selected tree-level single-branch correlators only because those correlators have zero derivatives with respect to \bar g and g×. This is a legitimate mathematical projection, but the physical interpretation needs stronger support. The paper gestures at a fine-tuned external source that would decouple the two CTP branches, but no such construction is supplied, and the abstract and the summary of Section IV say that the paper demonstrates 'the existence of two novel interacting fixed points' without consistently emphasising that these are fixed points of a projected tree-level flow. I recommend either providing a concrete criterion under which the projection is physically realised, or systematically rephrasing the claims as fixed points of the reduced, tree-level subsystem.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (100)] Please verify the prefactor in the analytic fixed-point values: solving Eqs. (98) and (99) at d=4 with α_4 = 1/(2π^2) gives \tilde m^2_* = 3(1-i)e^{-\tilde β/2}/(2π^2 \tilde κ^{1/2}) rather than the stated denominator 4π^2. This may be a typographical factor of 2, but it should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (86)] The linear (canonical) term in the beta function for \bar g should be (4-d)\bar g, not (4-d)g, given the definition \bar g(s) = e^{(4-d)s}(g_0 + δ\bar g(s)) in Eq. (82). Please correct this in the full set of beta functions.
  3. [Eq. (99)] The symbol 'α_{4−η}' in Eq. (99) appears to be a typo for α_{4−ε}; as written, the same symbol η is used both for the spectral-width regulator and for the dimension shift. Please use a distinct symbol for the dimension shift throughout.
  4. [Section IV, linearised flow discussion] The sentence 'Their are rather lengthy so We do not state them here explicitly' is grammatically incomplete, and the matrix elements a_ij are not given anywhere. Since the eigenvalues plotted in Figure 3 are a quantitative result, providing the explicit expressions (or at least the defining formulas) would make the paper more reproducible.
  5. [Figure 4 caption] The caption contains an incomplete reference: 'the blue dashed curve in Figure should be regarded' should say 'in Figure 2' (or the appropriate figure number).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the reduced-space fixed points are solved from explicit one-loop beta functions; the free regulator parameter κ is a stated input, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The Wilsonian effective action (2) and beta functions (84)-(87) are computed by explicit one-loop integration over fast modes, and the reduced-space fixed points of Section IV are defined by the physical requirement that single-branch correlators do not depend on g× or \bar g, so the conditions ∂s m^2 = ∂s g = 0 are solved, not assumed. The pinching-pole prescription η → 2E_k κ g^2 (Eq. 63) is a genuine extra input: it produces the O(g^0) terms that make the d=4 fixed points possible, and the fixed-point locations in Eq. (100) scale as κ^{-1/2}. However, κ is not fitted to the target result, the fixed points exist for generic κ>0 at the order considered, and the low-temperature/epsilon expansion reproduces the standard Gaussian and Wilson-Fisher scaling dimensions (Eqs. 102-104), providing an external consistency check. The paper explicitly flags in Section V that computing κ from the underlying QFT remains outstanding; this is a limitation and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction. The one self-citation, Ref. [8], proposes the dissipative CTP EFT structure, but that structure is rederived here by explicit calculation, so the self-citation is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the KMS thermal state and free CTP propagators (standard), on a phenomenological Breit-Wigner thermal width parametrised by an unspecified constant kappa (introduced by the authors), on the thin-shell perturbative limit that restores loop counting, and on the reduced-space approximation that ignores g× and \bar g for tree-level single-branch correlators. The only free parameter is kappa; no new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated. The generated coupling g× is a derived consequence, not an input.

free parameters (1)
  • kappa (thermal width parameter) = left unspecified
    Introduced in Eq. (63) as eta -> 2 E_k kappa g^2 to regularise pinching-pole singularities. The d=4 reduced fixed points scale as kappa^{-1/2} (Eq. (100)), so their location and even their existence at finite kappa depend on this free parameter. The authors state in the Conclusion that computing kappa from the underlying QFT remains future work.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption KMS periodicity and the free CTP propagator structure (Eqs. (4) and (11))
    The entire Feynman rule setup assumes the thermal state satisfies the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger relation and that the spectral density determines all propagators.
  • ad hoc to paper The pinching-pole divergence can be regulated by assigning the scalar a thermal width with eta -> 2 E_k kappa g^2 (Eq. (63))
    The Breit-Wigner form in Eq. (60) is motivated by weakly coupled thermal field theory, but the coefficient kappa is not derived from the underlying theory and controls the d=4 fixed point structure.
  • domain assumption Thin momentum shell s << 1 restores perturbative control over pinching-pole enhanced diagrams (Section III C)
    The authors argue multi-loop diagrams are suppressed by powers of s so the one-loop beta functions are valid; this is standard Wilsonian reasoning but is not proven to all orders.
  • ad hoc to paper Reduced space: single-branch tree-level correlators depend only on m2 and g, not on \bar g or g× (Section IV)
    This restriction is chosen because the full four-coupling flow has no interacting fixed points. It defines a subsystem whose fixed points are not fixed points of the full effective theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wilsonian renormalisation group and thermal field theory in the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LM3JW2UA

@misc{pith2026250116441,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wilsonian renormalisation group and thermal field theory in the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LM3JW2UA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16441}
}
abstract

We study perturbative Wilsonian renormalisation group (RG) for the scalar $\phi^4$ theory at finite temperature to one loop order in the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path (CTP) formalism. By explicitly integrating out the UV modes, we show how effective interactions coupling the two branches of the CTP contour arise. This provides a microscopic derivation of the type of effective CTP actions used in the literature. While the full effective theory has no critical points, we instead proceed to study critical properties of the RG flow in a reduced space of complex couplings that characterise certain time-ordered correlators and show the existence of two novel fixed points in $d=4$ spacetime dimensions. We relate one to the Wilson-Fisher fixed point known to exist only in $4-\epsilon$ dimensions, and the other to the standard Gaussian fixed point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16441 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Two possible choices for time contours connecting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Reduced complex coupling space fixed points in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Eigenvalues of the linearised flow around the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A diagram depicting the behaviour of the two fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stochastic inflation is the leading infrared limit of a coarse-grained Schwinger–Keldysh effective theory, and the same Fokker–Planck dynamics follows from a Polchinski-type renormalization-group flow for the reduced ...

  2. Critical dynamics of a scalar field near four spatial dimensions

    hep-th 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The exactly dissipationless critical dynamics of a scalar field is an invariant but unstable surface of the RG flow, and any small friction drives it to Model A, with new two-loop dynamic exponents.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [8]

    Grozdanov and J

    S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 91, 105031 (2015), arXiv:1305.3670 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [1]

    start by selecting a new, lower cutoff Λ′ < Λ, which divides the Fourier modes of ϕ into slow ( ϕ<, k < Λ′) and fast ( ϕ>, Λ′ < k <Λ)

    work page

  3. [2]

    integrate out the fast modes to obtain an effective theory Seff [ϕ<] of the slow modes, defined up to a new cutoff Λ ′

    work page

  4. [3]

    In terms of the path integral, the effective action is then given by eiSeff [ϕ<] ≡ eiS0[ϕ<] Z Dϕ>eiS0[ϕ>]eiSint[ϕ<,ϕ>]

    rescale momenta and distances to find a theory valid up to Λ. In terms of the path integral, the effective action is then given by eiSeff [ϕ<] ≡ eiS0[ϕ<] Z Dϕ>eiS0[ϕ>]eiSint[ϕ<,ϕ>]. (19) Notice that the free part of the action, once written in momentum space, factorises into a free action for fast and slow modes separately. This is a consequence of it bei...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Polchinski, Effective field theory and the fermi surface (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9210046 [hep-th]

    J. Polchinski, Effective field theory and the fermi surface (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9210046 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1999

  7. [6]

    N. P. Landsman and C. G. van Weert, Real- and imaginary-time field theory at finite temperature and density, physrep 145, 141 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [7]

    A. K. Das, Finite Temperature Field Theory(World Sci- entific, New York, 1997)

    work page 1997

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, Lectures on non-equilibrium ef- fective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoS 15 T ASI2017, 008 (2018), arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Green and G

    D. Green and G. Sun, Effective Field Theory and In-In Correlators, arXiv:2412.02739 [hep-th] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Glorioso, M

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, Effective field the- ory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current, JHEP 09, 096, arXiv:1701.07817 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Montenegro and G

    D. Montenegro and G. Torrieri, Lagrangian formulation of relativistic Israel-Stewart hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 94, 065042 (2016), arXiv:1604.05291 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, Effective field the- ory of dissipative fluids, JHEP 09, 095, arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Glorioso and H

    P. Glorioso and H. Liu, The second law of ther- modynamics from symmetry and unitarity (2016), arXiv:1612.07705 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chen-Lin, L

    X. Chen-Lin, L. V. Delacr´ etaz, and S. A. Hartnoll, The- ory of diffusive fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 091602 (2019), arXiv:1811.12540 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Ef- fective actions for anomalous hydrodynamics, JHEP 03, 034, arXiv:1312.0610 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, The fluid manifesto: emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 10.1007/jhep01(2016)184 (2016)

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Topo- logical sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics, JHEP 04, 039, arXiv:1511.07809 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Vardhan, S

    S. Vardhan, S. Grozdanov, S. Leutheusser, and H. Liu, Effective field theories of dissipative fluids with one-form symmetries (2024), arXiv:2408.12868 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Jensen, N

    K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, Dissi- pative hydrodynamics in superspace, JHEP 09, 127, arXiv:1701.07436 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, A panoply of Schwinger-Keldysh transport, SciPost Phys. 5, 053 (2018), arXiv:1804.04654 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Vardhan, S

    S. Vardhan, S. Grozdanov, S. Leutheusser, and H. Liu, Strong-field magnetohydrodynamics for neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042050 (2024), arXiv:2207.01636 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Winer and B

    M. Winer and B. Swingle, Hydrodynamic Theory of the Connected Spectral form Factor, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021009 (2022), arXiv:2012.01436 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Blake, H

    M. Blake, H. Lee, and H. Liu, A quantum hydrodynam- ical description for scrambling and many-body chaos, JHEP 10, 127, arXiv:1801.00010 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Blake and H

    M. Blake and H. Liu, On systems of maximal quantum chaos, JHEP 05, 229, arXiv:2102.11294 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gao and H

    P. Gao and H. Liu, An effective field theory for non-maximal quantum chaos, JHEP 11, 076, arXiv:2301.05256 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    C. O. Akyuz, G. Goon, and R. Penco, The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction, JHEP 06, 004, arXiv:2306.17232 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Jain and P

    A. Jain and P. Kovtun, Late Time Correlations in Hy- drodynamics: Beyond Constitutive Relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 071601 (2022), arXiv:2009.01356 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Abbasi and D

    N. Abbasi and D. H. Rischke, Three-point functions from a Schwinger-Keldysh effective action, resummed in derivatives, arXiv:2410.07929 [hep-th] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Montenegro, L

    D. Montenegro, L. Tinti, and G. Torrieri, Ideal rela- tivistic fluid limit for a medium with polarization, Phys. Rev. D 96, 056012 (2017), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 079901 (2017)], arXiv:1701.08263 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Jain and P

    A. Jain and P. Kovtun, Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for stable and causal relativistic hydrodynamics, JHEP 01, 162, arXiv:2309.00511 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Baggioli, Y

    M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, and V. Ziogas, U(1) quasi- hydrodynamics: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory and holography, JHEP 09, 019, arXiv:2304.14173 [hep- th]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hongo, N

    M. Hongo, N. Sogabe, M. A. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for hydrodynamics with approximate symmetries, arXiv:2411.08016 [hep-th] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Armas, A

    J. Armas, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Hydrodynamics of thermal active matter, arXiv:2405.11023 [cond-mat.soft] (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Jeon, Computing spectral densities in finite tem- perature field theory, Phys

    S. Jeon, Computing spectral densities in finite tem- perature field theory, Phys. Rev. D 47, 4586 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9210227

    1993 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Grozdanov, T

    S. Grozdanov, T. Lemut, J. Pelaiˇ c, and A. Soloviev, An- alytic structure of diffusive correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056053 (2024), arXiv:2407.13550 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Nagy and J

    S. Nagy and J. Polonyi, Renormalizing Open Quantum Field Theories, Universe 8, 127 (2022), arXiv:2012.13811 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kim and S

    K.-S. Kim and S. Ryu, Nonequilibrium thermodynam- ics perspectives for the monotonicity of the renormal- ization group flow, Phys. Rev. D 108, 126022 (2023), arXiv:2310.15763 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Polonyi, Boost invariant regulator for field the- ories, Int

    J. Polonyi, Boost invariant regulator for field the- ories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950017 (2019), arXiv:1803.09292 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jeon, Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativis- tic scalar field theory, Phys

    S. Jeon, Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativis- tic scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3591 (1995)

    1995

  34. [42]

    Wang and U

    E. Wang and U. W. Heinz, Shear viscosity of hot scalar field theory in the real time formalism, Phys. Rev. D 67, 025022 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0201116

    2003 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Arnold, G

    P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Transport coeffi- cients in high temperature gauge theories (I): leading-log results, JHEP 11 (2000), 001

    2000

  36. [44]

    A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff, Thermodynamic Calcu- lations in Relativistic Finite Temperature Quantum Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 230, 181 (1984)

    1984

  37. [45]

    Steib, S

    I. Steib, S. Nagy, and J. Polonyi, Renormalization in Minkowski space–time, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2150031 (2021), arXiv:1908.11311 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ojima, Lorentz Invariance Versus Temperature in QFT, Lett

    I. Ojima, Lorentz Invariance Versus Temperature in QFT, Lett. Math. Phys. 11, 73 (1986)

    1986

  39. [47]

    Elmfors and R

    P. Elmfors and R. Kobes, The Thermal beta function in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 51, 774 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9408254

    1995 arXiv

  40. [48]

    [49, 50]

    and its higher-dimensional generalisations, thereby opening the door to unconventional RG flows, such as the ones recently discussed in Refs. [49, 50]. Beyond a mathematical analysis of such fixed points, the relevance of their existence for real-life systems also remains an o...

  41. [49]

    Stanford, Many-body chaos at weak coupling, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 10.1007/jhep10(2016)009 (2016)

    D. Stanford, Many-body chaos at weak coupling, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 10.1007/jhep10(2016)009 (2016)

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3320 (1974)

    1974

  43. [51]

    Polonyi, Lectures on the functional renormalization group method, Central Eur

    J. Polonyi, Lectures on the functional renormalization group method, Central Eur. J. Phys. 1, 1 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0110026

    2003 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Irreversibility of the flux of the renormalization group in a 2d field theory, JETP lett 43, 16 730 (1986)

    1986

  45. [53]

    C. B. Jepsen, I. R. Klebanov, and F. K. Popov, RG limit cycles and unconventional fixed points in per- turbative QFT, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046015 (2021), arXiv:2010.15133 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C. B. Jepsen and F. K. Popov, Homoclinic Renormal- ization Group Flows, or When Relevant Operators Be- come Irrelevant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 141602 (2021), arXiv:2105.01625 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Nauenberg, Scaling representation for critical phe- nomena, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral 8, 925 (1975)

    M. Nauenberg, Scaling representation for critical phe- nomena, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral 8, 925 (1975)

    1975

  48. [56]

    Sornette and C

    D. Sornette and C. Sammis, Complex Critical Expo- nents from Renormalization Group Theory of Earth- quakes: Implications for Earthquake Predictions, Journal de Physique I 5, 607 (1995)

    1995

  49. [57]

    C. Jana, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Open quantum systems and Schwinger-Keldysh holograms, JHEP 07, 242, arXiv:2004.02888 [hep-th]

    2004 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Loganayagam, M

    R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta, Holo- graphic open quantum systems: toy models and ana- lytic properties of thermal correlators, JHEP 03, 153, arXiv:2211.07683 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polk- inghorne, The analytic S-matrix(Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1966)

    1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.