REVIEW 1 cited by
Constraining the spin parameter of near-extremal black holes using LISA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We describe a model that generates first order adiabatic EMRI waveforms for quasi-circular equatorial inspirals of compact objects into rapidly rotating (near-extremal) black holes. Using our model, we show that LISA could measure the spin parameter of near-extremal black holes (for $a \gtrsim 0.9999$) with extraordinary precision, $\sim$ 3-4 orders of magnitude better than for moderate spins, $a \sim 0.9$. Such spin measurements would be one of the tightest measurements of an astrophysical parameter within a gravitational wave context. Our results are primarily based off a Fisher matrix analysis, but are verified using both frequentest and Bayesian techniques. We present analytical arguments that explain these high spin precision measurements. The high precision arises from the spin dependence of the radial inspiral evolution, which is dominated by geodesic properties of the secondary orbit, rather than radiation reaction. High precision measurements are only possible if we observe the exponential damping of the signal that is characteristic of the near-horizon regime of near-extremal inspirals. Our results demonstrate that, if such black holes exist, LISA would be able to successfully identify rapidly rotating black holes up to $a = 1-10^{-9}$ , far past the Thorne limit of $a = 0.998$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Probing time-dependent scalar wigs with extreme mass ratio inspirals
For EMRIs where the smaller black hole carries an oscillating scalar cloud with mass 0.001 <= mu_s m_p <= 0.02, the scalar energy flux is negligible, so the inspiral and gravitational waveform are essentially unchanged.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.