REVIEW 3 cited by
Quarkonium production and polarization: where do we stand?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We review the current status of heavy quarkonium production phenomenology based on nonrelativistic effective field theories, focusing on spin-triplet $S$-wave states such as $J/\psi$, $\psi(2S)$, and $\Upsilon$. We present some representative examples for heavy quarkonium production mechanisms proposed in the literature, which vary significantly depending on the choice of data employed in analyses. We then discuss the r\^{o}le of polarization in discriminating between the different possible scenarios for quarkonium production. Other observables that may be useful in pinpointing the production mechanism are also introduced, such as the $\eta_c$ production, associated production of $J/\psi$ plus a gauge boson, and $J/\psi$ production at the Electron-Ion Collider.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ gluon fragmentation function for quarkonium
First NNLO QCD short-distance coefficients for the ³S₁⁽⁸⁾ gluon fragmentation function are obtained numerically to high precision, with analytic endpoint logarithms reconstructed for threshold resummation.
-
NRQCD Re-Confronts LHCb Data on Quarkonium Production within Jets
Updated NRQCD plus fragmenting jet function calculations, including threshold resummation, show that LHCb psi(2S) in-jet momentum distributions can distinguish between competing quarkonium production mechanisms, thoug...
-
Hadroproduction data support tetraquark hypothesis for $\chi_{c1} (3872)$
A parameter-free formalism, based on one color-octet channel, reproduces LHC hadroproduction rates of χc1(3872) and supports its tetraquark interpretation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.