REVIEW 2 cited by
Feed-down effect on $\Lambda$ spin polarization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We develop a theoretical framework to study the feed-down effect of higher-lying strange baryons on the spin polarization of the $\Lambda$ hyperon. In this framework, we consider two-body decays through strong, electromagnetic, and weak processes and derive general formulas for the angular distribution and spin polarization of the daughter particle by adopting the helicity formalism. Using the realistic experimental data as input, we explore the feed-down contribution to the global and the local $\Lambda$ polarizations and find that such a contribution suppresses the primordial $\Lambda$ polarization, which is not strong enough to resolve the discrepancy between the current theoretical and the experimental results on the azimuthal-angle dependence of $\Lambda$ polarization. Our paper may also be useful for the measurement of spin polarization of baryons heavier than $\Lambda$ (e.g., $\Xi^-$) in future experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Local Spin Polarization in Anisotropic Gubser Flow: Suppression Mechanism and Formulation Dependence
In an anisotropic Gubser flow, the longitudinal spin polarization's sign depends on which shear formulation is used, and two popular formulations show exact or near-exact cancellation between vorticity and shear contr...
-
Initial conditions and bulk viscosity effects on $\Lambda$ polarization in high-energy heavy ion collisions
Bulk viscosity determines the sign of longitudinal Lambda polarization at LHC energies in hydrodynamic simulations, and the azimuthal dependence of transverse polarization is sensitive to initial-state choices.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.