REVIEW 2 cited by
Binding Complexity and Multiparty Entanglement
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We introduce "binding complexity", a new notion of circuit complexity which quantifies the difficulty of distributing entanglement among multiple parties, each consisting of many local degrees of freedom. We define binding complexity of a given state as the minimal number of quantum gates that must act between parties to prepare it. To illustrate the new notion we compute it in a toy model for a scalar field theory, using certain multiparty entangled states which are analogous to configurations that are known in AdS/CFT to correspond to multiboundary wormholes. Pursuing this analogy, we show that our states can be prepared by the Euclidean path integral in $(0+1)$-dimensional quantum mechanics on graphs with wormhole-like structure. We compute the binding complexity of our states by adapting the Euler-Arnold approach to Nielsen's geometrization of gate counting, and find a scaling with entropy that resembles a result for the interior volume of holographic multiboundary wormholes. We also compute the binding complexity of general coherent states in perturbation theory, and show that for "double-trace deformations" of the Hamiltonian the effects resemble expansion of a wormhole interior in holographic theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Complexity Inequalities for Quantum Subsystems
Introduces tripartite complexity and complexity gap for three-region subsystems and reports that the gap has a definite sign in holographic volume complexity, Fisher-Rao Gaussian complexity, and Krylov-space approaches.
-
CFT Complexity and Penalty Factors
A submersion-based method turns weighted generator costs into state-complexity metrics for CFTs, giving analytic formulas in simple limits and constraints on which weight choices are viable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.