Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learning to (Learn at Test Time)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.13807 v2 pith:LZPSKGDB submitted 2023-10-20 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords loopinnerlearninglinearwhenattentionequivalentfinal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We reformulate the problem of supervised learning as learning to learn with two nested loops (i.e. learning problems). The inner loop learns on each individual instance with self-supervision before final prediction. The outer loop learns the self-supervised task used by the inner loop, such that its final prediction improves. Our inner loop turns out to be equivalent to linear attention when the inner-loop learner is only a linear model, and to self-attention when it is a kernel estimator. For practical comparison with linear or self-attention layers, we replace each of them in a transformer with an inner loop, so our outer loop is equivalent to training the architecture. When each inner-loop learner is a neural network, our approach vastly outperforms transformers with linear attention on ImageNet from 224 x 224 raw pixels in both accuracy and FLOPs, while (regular) transformers cannot run.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning to Remember, Learn, and Forget in Attention-Based Models

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Palimpsa adds a per-slot importance/precision state to gated linear attention, letting a fixed-size memory forget stale information and protect important information, and recovers Mamba2 as a high-forgetting limit.

  2. UrbanMind: Urban Dynamics Prediction with Multifaceted Spatial-Temporal Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UrbanMind combines a multifaceted masked autoencoder, semantic prompting, and test-time adaptation in an LLM to forecast traffic speed, inflow, and demand, reporting lower MAE and RMSE than baselines in three cities.

  3. SLOT: Sample-specific Language Model Optimization at Test-time

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SLOT adapts an LLM to each prompt by optimizing a lightweight final-layer vector to minimize prompt loss, boosting benchmark reasoning accuracy by a few points.

Pith tools