Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 46 references

Explaining the magnitude of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity via electron-electron exchange

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electron exchange amplifies tiny spin bias into CISS effect

desk verdict Exchange amplification of spin bias in CISS: real mechanism, but the magnitude claim is only as good as the HF approximation and the ad hoc initial perturbation read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06858 v1 pith:M5G6745K submitted 2026-07-07 quant-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bence Csakany , Alex J. W. Thom This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 72.25.-b73.63.-b31.15.xr
keywords spinadsorbedchirality-inducedcisselectron-electronexchangehartree--fockmagnitude
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the magnitude of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity (CISS) — where chiral molecules filter electrons by spin — is primarily produced by electron-electron exchange interactions, not by spin-orbit coupling alone. Using a non-equilibrium Green's function calculation at the Hartree-Fock level for 3-methylcyclohexanone on Cu(111), the authors show that a tiny initial spin bias of about 0.0014% in the copper substrate is amplified roughly a thousand-fold by exchange interactions into an approximately 2% spin polarization in the outgoing photoelectron current. The exchange interaction, which makes same-spin electrons repel each other more than opposite-spin electrons, breaks the spin symmetry of the molecular orbitals and creates a spin texture near the chiral molecule. The authors argue this is the same mechanism known as Lowdin's symmetry dilemma in Hartree-Fock theory, where the mean-field approximation spontaneously breaks spin symmetry to lower the energy. Crucially, the amplification requires no unphysical parameters or fine-tuning: a small symmetry-breaking perturbation (from spin-orbit coupling or chiral phonons) seeds the process, and exchange does the rest. The resulting spin-polarization spectrum qualitatively matches experimental observations in both magnitude and shape.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) framework solved self-consistently at the Hartree-Fock level. The system is partitioned into a bulk copper lead, an explicit Cu(111)+molecule region, a photoelectron lead, and a vacuum lead. The exchange interaction enters through the Hartree-Fock self-energy, which depends on the density matrix and is updated iteratively. An initial spin bias is introduced by making the lead coupling parameter gamma spin-dependent (4% asymmetry between alpha and beta electrons), which produces only a 0.0014% net spin polarization in the density because only states near the Fermi level are affected. The amplification then arises self-consist: 1

What would settle it

If the exchange amplification factor depends sensitively on the specific form of the initial spin bias (rather than being robust to it), then the 1000-fold amplification would be an artifact of the chosen proxy rather than a physical mechanism. The paper partially addresses this by showing qualitative stability under parameter variation, but the initial bias form itself is not varied.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that electron-electron exchange interactions within the Hartree-Fock approximation act as a spin-symmetry-breaking amplifier: a minuscule initial spin bias (~0.0014%) in a copper substrate is amplified into a measurable ~2% spin polarization in photoelectrons transmitted through a chiral molecule, reproducing the experimentally observed magnitude of CISS without unphysical parameters. The mechanism is identified as the same spin-symmetry breaking long known in Hartree-Fock theory (Lowdin's symmetry dilemma), here rendered physically meaningful because the experimental setup (chiral molecule, photoelectron flux) already breaks the relevant point-group and time-reversa

Load-bearing premise

The initial spin bias is introduced artificially by making the lead coupling parameter slightly spin-dependent (a 4% asymmetry), which the authors use as a proxy for the symmetry-breaking that spin-orbit coupling or chiral phonons would produce. The actual source of the initial bias is not explicitly calculated, and whether this proxy faithfully represents the real physical mechanism determines whether the amplification factor is physically meaningful.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If exchange-driven amplification is the primary mechanism for CISS magnitude, then larger molecules with more delocalized pi-systems (e.g., helicenes, DNA) should show proportionally larger CISS effects, as the spin texture extends over more of the molecule.
  • The theory predicts that CISS should vanish in systems with restored time-reversal or point-group symmetry, making it testable by comparing equilibrium vs. non-equilibrium measurements.
  • Any CISS experiment can be understood as a two-stage process: a small relativistic or phonon-driven spin bias is seeded, then amplified by exchange — suggesting that the molecular identity matters less for the seeding and more for the amplification geometry.
  • The mechanism implies that standard DFT (which replaces exact exchange with approximate functionals) may fail to reproduce CISS magnitudes, making Hartree-Fock-based or hybrid-functional approaches necessary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes that electron-electron exchange interactions within the Hartree-Fock approximation can amplify a small initial spin bias into the percent-level spin polarizations observed in Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity (CISS) experiments. Using a non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) framework with self-consistent HF, the authors simulate 3-methylcyclohexanone on Cu(111) and show that a ~0.0014% initial spin density bias (introduced via spin-dependent lead coupling parameters) produces ~2% oscillations in transmitted photoelectron spin polarization, consistent with experiment. The paper connects this amplification to the well-known phenomenon of spin-symmetry breaking in unrestricted Hartree-Fock and provides a rigorous symmetry analysis (SI-I) establishing when such solutions are physically meaningful.

Significance. The CISS effect has lacked a widely accepted microscopic explanation for over a decade, with existing theories typically requiring unphysical parameters or fine-tuning to reproduce experimental magnitudes. This paper offers a physically motivated mechanism—exchange-driven amplification of a small symmetry-breaking perturbation—that produces the right order of magnitude without invoking unphysical parameters. The connection to spin-symmetry breaking in HF is conceptually valuable and provides a framework that can be tested and extended. The publicly available code and physically motivated parameter choices (where specified) are commendable and enhance reproducibility. The symmetry analysis in SI-I is rigorous and correctly identifies the conditions under which CISS is symmetry-allowed.

major comments (3)
  1. The central claim is that exchange is 'the primary cause of the magnification' of CISS. The conceptual argument (Section: LINKS TO SPIN SYMMETRY BREAKING) is sound: RHF constrains α/β orbitals to be identical (no spin texture), while UHF allows them to differ, with exchange driving the difference. However, no explicit numerical comparison between RHF (or a non-interacting calculation with the same initial bias) and UHF is presented. Such a control calculation—showing that the ~2% polarization vanishes or is drastically reduced without exchange—would directly substantiate the claim that exchange, rather than the initial bias itself or the transport geometry, is responsible for the amplification. This is load-bearing for the paper's central thesis and should be included.
  2. The abstract states that 'its ab-initio nature ensures all parameters are physically realistic.' While the γ values for the leads are derived from physical considerations (SI-III, Eq. 56), the 4% spin asymmetry in γ (1.04/0.96 for α/β) is an ad hoc proxy for spin-orbit coupling or chiral phonon effects that are not explicitly calculated. The authors are transparent about this in the main text (Results section: 'This perturbation has been introduced to model the spin symmetry breaking as would be caused by spin-orbit coupling or chiral phonons'), but the abstract's claim of fully physical parameters is misleading and should be qualified.
  3. The amplification factor (~1400×, from 0.0014% to 2%) is demonstrated only within unrestricted Hartree-Fock. The authors acknowledge that 'the current model is simplistic relying on a mean-field approximation and therefore neglecting electron correlations which could influence spin textures' (Conclusion). However, spin-symmetry breaking in UHF is known to be system-dependent and can be quantitatively affected by correlation (e.g., in bond dissociation). The paper would benefit from at least a brief discussion of whether the amplification is expected to survive or be suppressed in correlated methods, and what the direction of this effect would be. This is relevant because the claim is specifically about the *magnitude* of CISS, not just its qualitative existence.
minor comments (6)
  1. The relationship between the 4% asymmetry in γ and the resulting 0.0014% spin polarization of the density could be explained more clearly. The text notes that 'the change in γ only effects those states that are within 10kBT ≈ 10mEh of the Fermi level,' but a more quantitative derivation would help the reader understand why a 4% parameter asymmetry produces a 0.0014% density asymmetry.
  2. Figure 4 (right panel): the y-axis label and units for spin polarization should be clarified. The text states the polarization is defined by Eq. 16, but the figure axis label is not fully specified in the caption.
  3. SI Figure 2 is referenced in the main text discussion but the figure numbering in the SI appears to restart. Cross-referencing between main text and SI figures could be made more explicit (e.g., 'SI Figure 2' rather than just 'Figure 2').
  4. The phrase 'connectchiralityto spin' in the Introduction (paragraph 3) appears to be missing a space: 'connect chirality to spin.'
  5. In the Model Parameters section, the statement 'The results are qualitatively the same (section SI-VI) independent of the exact value chosen' for γ could be strengthened by briefly stating the range tested, rather than requiring the reader to consult SI-VI.
  6. Reference [29] is a footnote explaining the arbitrariness of the α/β choice. This is important context and could be briefly mentioned in the main text rather than only as a footnote, as it bears on the physical interpretation of the initial bias.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ~2% output polarization emerges from self-consistent HF exchange amplification of a 0.0014% input bias, not by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that electron-electron exchange within Hartree-Fock amplifies a small initial spin bias (~0.0014%) into a larger output polarization (~2%). Walking the derivation chain: (1) The initial bias is introduced via a 4% asymmetry in the lead coupling parameter γ (1.04/0.96 for α/β electrons), which the paper explicitly states is a proxy for spin-orbit coupling or chiral phonon effects. The resulting equilibrium spin polarization of the density is only 0.0014% — this is an output of the calculation, not an input. (2) The ~2% transmitted photoelectron spin polarization is the result of solving the self-consistent HF Dyson equations (Eqs. 5-9, 46) with the exchange self-energy (Eq. 46) feeding back on the density. The output polarization is not defined in terms of the input bias by construction; it emerges from the self-consistent solution. (3) The paper does cite prior work by one of the authors (Burton, Thom, and Loos, Ref. 34) on spin-symmetry breaking in HF, but this citation provides conceptual context (Lowdin's symmetry dilemma) rather than a load-bearing theorem that forces the conclusion. The amplification mechanism is demonstrated through explicit computation, not imported via self-citation. (4) The paper does not fit any parameter to the output polarization and then claim it as a prediction. The γ parameters are chosen to be physically motivated (Eq. 14-15, SI Table II), and the paper notes the results are qualitatively robust to parameter variation (SI-VI, Figures 3-4). The main limitation — that the amplification may not survive beyond HF — is a correctness risk, not a circularity issue. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks (comparison to experiment ~4%, Ref. 25).

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, or forces. It uses standard quantum chemistry (HF, NEGF) with physically motivated parameters. The main concern is the ad hoc proxy for the initial spin bias (spin-dependent γ), which is a modeling choice rather than an invented entity. All free parameters are either physically motivated (chemical potentials, coupling strengths) or explicitly acknowledged as arbitrary (the 1.04/0.96 factors).

free parameters (6)
  • γ_bulk (spin-up) = 1.04 × 10⁻² Eh
    Chosen to represent the bulk copper coupling with a 4% spin-up bias. The 1.04 factor is arbitrary (paper states 'This choice is arbitrary') and represents the initial spin-symmetry breaking proxy.
  • γ_bulk (spin-down) = 0.96 × 10⁻² Eh
    Complementary to γ_bulk spin-up, chosen as 0.96 to create a 4% asymmetry. Together these produce the 0.0014% equilibrium spin polarization that is then amplified.
  • γ_photoelectron (spin-up/down) = 1.04/0.96 × 10⁻⁴ Eh
    Reduced by 100x from γ_bulk to represent lower photoelectron density of states. The same 4% spin asymmetry is applied.
  • γ_vacuum = 10⁻² Eh
    Coupling to vacuum scattering states, chosen equal to γ_bulk. Paper states results are qualitatively independent of exact value (SI-VI).
  • µ_bulk = -0.15 Eh (-4.08 eV)
    Chemical potential of bulk copper, set to create neutral system. Differs from experimental work function (-4.46 eV) by 0.38 eV due to approximations.
  • µ_photoelectron = -0.15 Eh + 5.9 eV
    Set to correspond to 210 nm UV light source, matching experimental conditions from ref 25.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The wide-band limit (constant density of states in leads) is a valid approximation for bulk copper and photoelectron/vacuum reservoirs.
    Used throughout the NEGF calculation (SI-III). The paper acknowledges this neglects electronic structure of bulk copper. Section MODEL PARAMETERS and SI-III.
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock mean-field approximation adequately captures the exchange amplification mechanism, and electron correlation effects do not qualitatively change the spin texture.
    The entire calculation uses HF self-energy (Eq. 3, 46). The paper acknowledges in CONCLUSION: 'relying on a mean-field approximation and therefore neglecting electron correlations which could influence spin textures.'
  • ad hoc to paper A spin-dependent modification of the lead coupling parameter γ is a valid proxy for the spin-symmetry breaking caused by SOC or chiral phonons.
    Section RESULTS: 'γ_bulk and γ_photoelectron were made spin dependent by increasing the γ for α electrons by a factor 1.04 and decreasing γ for β electrons by a factor 0.96.' This models the initial bias that is then amplified.
  • domain assumption The Born-Oppenheimer approximation is valid for this system.
    Stated in section MODELLING NON-EQUILIBRIUM TRANSPORT: 'use the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.'
  • domain assumption Time-reversal symmetry and point-group symmetry are broken by the experimental setup (incoming photon flux, chiral molecule, no spatial symmetry), making spin-symmetry-broken HF solutions physical.
    Section SI-I.D: 'the molecule-surface-incoming photon system has no spatial symmetry... Therefore neither point-group symmetry nor time-reversal symmetry suggest a zero spin polarisation.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Explaining the magnitude of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity via electron-electron exchange." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M5G6745K

@misc{pith2026260706858,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Explaining the magnitude of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity via electron-electron exchange},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M5G6745K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06858}
}
abstract

Chiral molecular structure can couple to electron spin, leading to unexpected spin polarization effects. This Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity (CISS) was first reported for DNA molecules adsorbed on gold but its microscopic origin remains unclear. We demonstrated though simulation that the exchange arising from electron-electron Coulomb interactions within the self-consistent mean field (Hartree--Fock) approximation can yield significant ($\sim 2\%$) spin polarisation for $3$-methylcyclohexanone adsorbed on Cu(111) amplifying a much smaller ($\sim 0.0014\%$) initial bias, consistent with experiment. Symmetry considerations ensure the result is physically meaningful, while its ab-initio nature ensures all parameters are physically realistic. This amplification is connected to existing studies on spin-symmetry breaking in Hartree--Fock, providing a new pathway for understanding the magnitude of CISS as an emergent phenomenon of interacting electrons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06858 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic of the Green’s-function mod [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the distribution of the non-equilibrium density and spin density. The non-equilibrium compo￾nent of the density matrix is defined by: G n Non-equilibrium Comp. = Z ∞ µbulk −iG <(E)dE (17) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spin difference in number of electrons (equation 62). The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Energy resolved spin polarised current along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Energy resolved spin polarised current along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy resolved spin polarised current along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G¨ ohler, V

    B. G¨ ohler, V. Hamelbeck, T. Z. Markus, M. Kettner, G. F. Hanne, Z. Vager, R. Naaman, and H. Zacharias. Spin Selectivity in Electron Transmission Through Self- Assembled Monolayers of Double-Stranded DNA.Sci- ence, 331(6019):894–897, February 2011. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Schneider, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Daniel E

    Mohammad Reza Safari, Frank Matthes, Vasile Caciuc, Nicolae Atodiresei, Claus M. Schneider, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Daniel E. B¨ urgler. Enan- tioselective Adsorption on Magnetic Surfaces.Ad- vanced Materials, 36(14):2308666, 2024. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.202308666

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202308666 2024

  3. [3]

    Das, Andrea L

    Niccol` o Giaconi, Lorenzo Poggini, Michela Lupi, Mat- teo Briganti, Anil Kumar, Tapan K. Das, Andrea L. Sorrentino, Caterina Viglianisi, Stefano Menichetti, Ron Naaman, Roberta Sessoli, and Matteo Mannini. Ef- ficient Spin-Selective Electron Transport at Low Volt- ages of Thia-Bridged Triarylamine Hetero[4]helicenes Chemisorbed Monolayer.ACS Nano, 17(15)...

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Y. Lu, B. P. Bloom, S. Qian, and D. H. Waldeck. Enan- tiospecificity of Cysteine Adsorption on a Ferromagnetic Surface: Is It Kinetically or Thermodynamically Con- trolled?J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 12(32):7854–7858, August

    work page

  5. [6]

    Origin of biological homochirality by crystallization of an RNA precursor on a magnetic sur- face.Sci

    Furkan Ozturk. Origin of biological homochirality by crystallization of an RNA precursor on a magnetic sur- face.Sci. Adv., 9, June 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [7]

    A new approach towards spintron- ics–spintronics with no magnets.J

    Karen Michaeli, Vaibhav Varade, Ron Naaman, and David H Waldeck. A new approach towards spintron- ics–spintronics with no magnets.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 29(10):103002, January 2017. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 2017

  7. [8]

    Bloom, Yossi Paltiel, Ron Naaman, and David H

    Brian P. Bloom, Yossi Paltiel, Ron Naaman, and David H. Waldeck. Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity. Chem. Rev., 124(4):1950–1991, February 2024. Pub- lisher: American Chemical Society

    work page 1950

  8. [9]

    van Ruitenbeek, Latha Venkataraman, David H

    Ferdinand Evers, Amnon Aharony, Nir Bar-Gill, Ora Entin-Wohlman, Per Hedeg˚ ard, Oded Hod, Pavel Jelinek, Grzegorz Kamieniarz, Mikhail Lemeshko, 7 Karen Michaeli, Vladimiro Mujica, Ron Naaman, Yossi Paltiel, Sivan Refaely-Abramson, Oren Tal, Jos Thijssen, Michael Thoss, Jan M. van Ruitenbeek, Latha Venkataraman, David H. Waldeck, Binghai Yan, and Leeor Kr...

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202106629 2022

Show all 46 references
  1. [10]

    Sasselov, Yossi Paltiel, and S

    Jonas Fransson, Yael Kapon, Lilach Brann, Shira Yoche- lis, Dimitar D. Sasselov, Yossi Paltiel, and S. Furkan Oz- turk. Chiral Phonons Enhance Ferromagnetism, Decem- ber 2024. arXiv:2412.13787 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Theory of Chiral In- duced Spin Selectivity.Nano Lett., 19(8):5253–5259, Au- gust 2019

    Sakse Dalum and Per Hedeg˚ ard. Theory of Chiral In- duced Spin Selectivity.Nano Lett., 19(8):5253–5259, Au- gust 2019. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2019

  3. [12]

    Geometric spin–orbit coupling and chirality-induced spin selectivity

    Atsuo Shitade and Emi Minamitani. Geometric spin–orbit coupling and chirality-induced spin selectivity. New J. Phys., 22(11):113023, November 2020. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2020

  4. [13]

    Chirality- Driven Magnetization Emerges from Relativistic Four- Current Dynamics, April 2025

    Xuechen Zheng, Shiv Upadhyay, Tian Wang, Agam Shayit, Jun Liu, Dali Sun, and Xiaosong Li. Chirality- Driven Magnetization Emerges from Relativistic Four- Current Dynamics, April 2025. arXiv:2504.03781 [cond- mat]

    2025

  5. [14]

    Chirality-Induced Spin–Orbit Coupling and Spin Selectivity.J

    Massimiliano Di Ventra, Rafael Gutierrez, and Gianau- relio Cuniberti. Chirality-Induced Spin–Orbit Coupling and Spin Selectivity.J. Phys. Chem. A, 129(40):9504– 9510, October 2025. Publisher: American Chemical So- ciety

    2025

  6. [15]

    Chiral Induced Spin Polarized Electron Current: Origin of the Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity Effect.J

    Jonas Fransson. Chiral Induced Spin Polarized Electron Current: Origin of the Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity Effect.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 16(17):4346–4353, May 2025

    2025

  7. [16]

    Weak elec- tron–phonon coupling is insufficient to generate signifi- cant CISS in two-terminal transport.J

    Vipul Upadhyay and Amikam Levy. Weak elec- tron–phonon coupling is insufficient to generate signifi- cant CISS in two-terminal transport.J. Chem. Phys., 164(16):164303, April 2026

    2026

  8. [17]

    Fransson

    J. Fransson. Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity: The Role of Electron Correlations.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 10(22):7126–7132, November 2019. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2019

  9. [18]

    Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity and Non- equilibrium Spin Accumulation in Molecules and In- terfaces: A First-Principles Study.J

    Sumit Naskar, Vladimiro Mujica, and Carmen Her- rmann. Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity and Non- equilibrium Spin Accumulation in Molecules and In- terfaces: A First-Principles Study.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 14(3):694–701, January 2023. Publisher: Ameri- can Chemical Society

    2023

  10. [19]

    Fransson

    J. Fransson. Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and ”chiral-induced spin selectivity.Phys. Rev. B, 102(23):235416, December 2020. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  11. [20]

    Blackert, Rui Xu, Boris I

    Jiaming Luo, Tong Lin, Junjie Zhang, Xiaotong Chen, Elizabeth R. Blackert, Rui Xu, Boris I. Yakobson, and Hanyu Zhu. Large effective magnetic fields from chiral phonons in rare-earth halides.Science, 382(6671):698– 702, November 2023. Publisher: American Association for the Ad...

    2023

  12. [21]

    Comstock, Xiao Li, Jun Zhou, Lifa Zhang, Wei You, Dali Sun, and Jun Liu

    Kyunghoon Kim, Eric Vetter, Liang Yan, Cong Yang, Ziqi Wang, Rui Sun, Yu Yang, Andrew H. Comstock, Xiao Li, Jun Zhou, Lifa Zhang, Wei You, Dali Sun, and Jun Liu. Chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect. Nat. Mater., 22(3):322–328, March 2023. Publisher: Na- ture Publishing Group

    2023

  13. [22]

    Charge Redistribution and Spin Polar- ization Driven by Correlation Induced Electron Exchange in Chiral Molecules.Nano Lett., 21(7):3026–3032, April

    Jonas Fransson. Charge Redistribution and Spin Polar- ization Driven by Correlation Induced Electron Exchange in Chiral Molecules.Nano Lett., 21(7):3026–3032, April

  14. [23]

    Publisher: American Chemical Society

  15. [24]

    Fransson

    J. Fransson. Charge and Spin Dynamics and Enantios- electivity in Chiral Molecules.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 13(3):808–814, January 2022. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2022

  16. [25]

    Insight into the Origin of Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity from a Symmetry Analysis of Electronic Transmission.J

    Martin Sebastian Z¨ ollner, Solmar Varela, Ernesto Med- ina, Vladimiro Mujica, and Carmen Herrmann. Insight into the Origin of Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity from a Symmetry Analysis of Electronic Transmission.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 16(5):2914–2929, May 2020. Publisher: Ame...

    2020

  17. [26]

    Gonz´ alez-Arraga, Daniel Finkelstein-Shapiro, Bertrand Berche, and Vladimiro Mujica

    Ernesto Medina, Luis A. Gonz´ alez-Arraga, Daniel Finkelstein-Shapiro, Bertrand Berche, and Vladimiro Mujica. Continuum model for chiral induced spin se- lectivity in helical molecules.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 142(19):194308, May 2015

    2015

  18. [27]

    Vectorial Electron Spin Filter- ing by an All-Chiral Metal–Molecule Heterostructure.J

    Chetana Badala Viswanatha, Johannes St¨ ockl, Benito Arnoldi, Sebastian Becker, Martin Aeschlimann, and Benjamin Stadtm¨ uller. Vectorial Electron Spin Filter- ing by an All-Chiral Metal–Molecule Heterostructure.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 13(26):6244–6249, July 2022. Pub- lisher: A...

    2022

  19. [28]

    Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering

    Supriyo Datta.Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Sys- tems. Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    1995

  20. [29]

    Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2007

    Jørgen Rammer.Quantum Field Theory of Non- equilibrium States. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2007

    2007

  21. [30]

    Anderson

    Paul A. Anderson. The Work Function of Copper.Phys. Rev., 76(3):388–390, August 1949. Publisher: American Physical Society

    1949

  22. [31]

    This choice is arbitrary, reversing theαandβelectrons would yield related results as seen in CISS experiments where theLenantiomer is exchanged forR, SI-I

  23. [32]

    B¨ urgler, and Claus M

    Mohammad Reza Safari, Frank Matthes, Karl-Heinz Ernst, Daniel E. B¨ urgler, and Claus M. Schneider. De- position of Chiral Heptahelicene Molecules on Ferromag- netic Co and Fe Thin-Film Substrates.Nanomaterials, 12(19):3281, January 2022. Number: 19 Publisher: Mul- tidisciplin...

    2022

  24. [33]

    Maslyuk, Daniel N¨ urenberg, Johannes Seibel, Rafael Gutierrez, Gianaure- lio Cuniberti, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Helmut Zacharias

    Matthias Kettner, Volodymyr V. Maslyuk, Daniel N¨ urenberg, Johannes Seibel, Rafael Gutierrez, Gianaure- lio Cuniberti, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Helmut Zacharias. Chirality-Dependent Electron Spin Filtering by Molec- ular Monolayers of Helicenes.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 9(8):2025–20...

    2025

  25. [34]

    Weakly Self- Assembled [6]Helicenes: Circularly Polarized Light and Spin Filtering Properties.Chemistry – A Eu- ropean Journal, 29(63):e202302254, 2023

    Rafael Rodr´ ıguez, Cristina Naranjo, Anil Kumar, Kais Dhbaibi, Paola Matozzo, Franck Camerel, Nicolas Vanthuyne, Rafael G´ omez, Ron Naaman, Luis S´ anchez, and Jeanne Crassous. Weakly Self- Assembled [6]Helicenes: Circularly Polarized Light and Spin Filtering Properties.Chem...

    2023 doi

  26. [35]

    Yuthika Pillai, Hugh G. A. Burton, and David J. Wales. Effect of Exact Exchange on the Energy Landscape in Self-Consistent Field Theory.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 21(3):1203–1212, February 2025. Publisher: American Chemical Society. 8

    2025

  27. [36]

    Hugh G. A. Burton, Alex J. W. Thom, and Pierre- Fran¸ cois Loos. Parity-Time Symmetry in Hartree–Fock Theory.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 15(8):4374–4385, Au- gust 2019. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2019

  28. [37]

    Lykos and G

    P. Lykos and G. W. Pratt. Discussion on The Hartree- Fock Approximation.Rev. Mod. Phys., 35(3):496–501, July 1963

    1963

  29. [38]

    Effi- cient implementation of the nonequilibrium Green func- tion method for electronic transport calculations.Phys

    Taisuke Ozaki, Kengo Nishio, and Hiori Kino. Effi- cient implementation of the nonequilibrium Green func- tion method for electronic transport calculations.Phys. Rev. B, 81(3):035116, January 2010. Publisher: Ameri- can Physical Society. Supplementary Information for ‘Explaini...

    2010

  30. [39]

    Altmann.Rotations, Quaternions, and Double Groups

    Simon L. Altmann.Rotations, Quaternions, and Double Groups. Oxford : Clarendon, 1986

    1986

  31. [40]

    Altmann and Peter Herzig.Point-Group Theory Tables

    Simon L. Altmann and Peter Herzig.Point-Group Theory Tables. Oxford : Clarendon, 1994

    1994

  32. [41]

    L. D. Barron and A. David Buckingham. Time Reversal and Molecular Properties|Accounts of Chemical Research

  33. [42]

    Hugh G. A. Burton, Alex J. W. Thom, and Pierre-Fran¸ cois Loos. Parity-Time Symmetry in 16 Hartree–Fock Theory.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 15(8):4374–4385, August 2019. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2019

  34. [43]

    L. D. Barron. True and false chirality and parity violation.Chemical Physics Letters, 123(5):423–427, January 1986

    1986

  35. [44]

    Nonorthogonal basis sets in quantum mechanics: Representations and second quantization.Phys

    Emilio Artacho and Lorenzo Mil´ ans Del Bosch. Nonorthogonal basis sets in quantum mechanics: Representations and second quantization.Phys. Rev. A, 43(11):5770–5777, June 1991

    1991

  36. [45]

    Cambridge Studies in Semi- conductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering

    Supriyo Datta.Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems. Cambridge Studies in Semi- conductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    1995

  37. [46]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007

    Jørgen Rammer.Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007

    2007

  38. [47]

    Iterative subspace algorithms for finite- temperature solution of Dyson equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(9):094101, March 2022

    Pavel Pokhilko, Chia-Nan Yeh, and Dominika Zgid. Iterative subspace algorithms for finite- temperature solution of Dyson equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(9):094101, March 2022. arXiv:2112.08890 [physics]. 17

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.