REVIEW 2 cited by
Gravastars and Black Holes of Anisotropic Dark Energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Dynamical models of prototype gravastars made of anisotropic dark energy are constructed, in which an infinitely thin spherical shell of a perfect fluid with the equation of state $p = (1-\gamma)\sigma$ divides the whole spacetime into two regions, the internal region filled with a dark energy fluid, and the external Schwarzschild region. The models represent "bounded excursion" stable gravastars, where the thin shell is oscillating between two finite radii, while in other cases they collapse until the formation of black holes. Here we show, for the first time in the literature, a model of gravastar and formation of black hole with both interior and thin shell constituted exclusively of dark energy. Besides, the sign of the parameter of anisotropy ($p_t - p_r$) seems to be relevant to the gravastar formation. The formation is favored when the tangential pressure is greater than the radial pressure, at least in the neighborhood of the isotropic case ($\omega=-1$).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Horizonless star based on regular black hole with finite radius and its observational signatures
A finite-radius Hayward metric turned into an anisotropic gravastar predicts chaotic photon rings and gravitational-wave echo trains above a compactness threshold x_m, but the GW170817 72 Hz match forces a very large ...
-
Black Holes in the Red-sequence Elliptical Galaxies at Redshifts $\sim 0.7-2.5$: Not Dark Energy Source but Remanants of Little Red Dots
At redshifts 2 to 7, black holes in massive elliptical hosts show no sign of the cosmological growth needed to make black holes the dark energy, with k=0.13 +/- 0.27 instead of k=3.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.