REVIEW 5 cited by
Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Test-time adaptation has proven effective in adapting a given trained model to unseen test samples with potential distribution shifts. However, in real-world scenarios, models are usually deployed on resource-limited devices, e.g., FPGAs, and are often quantized and hard-coded with non-modifiable parameters for acceleration. In light of this, existing methods are often infeasible since they heavily depend on computation-intensive backpropagation for model updating that may be not supported. To address this, we propose a test-time Forward-Optimization Adaptation (FOA) method. In FOA, we seek to solely learn a newly added prompt (as model's input) via a derivative-free covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy. To make this strategy work stably under our online unsupervised setting, we devise a novel fitness function by measuring test-training statistic discrepancy and model prediction entropy. Moreover, we design an activation shifting scheme that directly tunes the model activations for shifted test samples, making them align with the source training domain, thereby further enhancing adaptation performance. Without using any backpropagation and altering model weights, FOA runs on quantized 8-bit ViT outperforms gradient-based TENT on full-precision 32-bit ViT, while achieving an up to 24-fold memory reduction on ImageNet-C.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Audio-Visual Continual Test-Time Adaptation without Forgetting
By adapting only the fusion layer and retrieving past good parameter states via raw input statistics, AV-CTTA outperforms existing audio-visual continual test-time adaptation methods and forgets far less.
-
From LLMs to Edge: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on Edge Devices
On depthwise-separable CNNs, PEFT memory savings drop to about half of LLM levels, though LoRA and DoRA still cut update FLOPs by up to 95%.
-
When Small Guides Large: Cross-Model Co-Learning for Test-Time Adaptation
COCA shows that bidirectional cross-model co-learning during test-time adaptation lets even small models significantly improve large models' robustness to distribution shift.
-
PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptation
PAID proposes Householder-based orthogonal weight updates for continual test-time adaptation, claiming that preserving pairwise angular structure of pretrained weights is a useful prior, but the math and validation fo...
-
EdgeMLBalancer: A Self-Adaptive Approach for Dynamic Model Switching on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices
EdgeMLBalancer uses epsilon-greedy switching among four edge object-detection models, driven by CPU usage and confidence, and reports better accuracy and fairness than two baselines in a single 30-minute smartphone trial.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.