Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fractional entropy of the Brown-Kucha\v{r} dust in fractional anti-de Sitter quantum gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The fractional Wheeler-DeWitt equation gives Brown-Kuchař dust in flat AdS a mass spectrum $M_n\propto(n+1/2)^{\alpha/2}$ and a fractal mass dimension $D=3\alpha/2$.

desk verdict A coherent but fragile extension of the fractional quantization program to Brown-Kuchař dust in AdS: the spectrum rests on an unverified semiclassical replacement for the Riesz Laplacian, plus a few factor slips that are fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01244 v2 pith:N3ZRZYIZ submitted 2025-01-02 gr-qc hep-th

P. F. da Silva Júnior , S. Jalalzadeh , H. Moradpour This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords fractionalWheeler-DeWittequationBrown-KuchařdustRieszderivativeanti-deSitterquantumcosmologymassspectrumfractaldimensionLévyparametercosmologicalentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the mass spectrum and entropy of Brown-Kuchař dust in flat anti-de Sitter spacetime from a fractional version of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation. The main result is a quantized dust mass $M_n = \frac{3}{4}\left(\frac{\pi\alpha}{2B(1/\alpha,1+1/\alpha)}\right)^{\alpha/2}\sqrt{|\Lambda|/3}\,(n+1/2)^{\alpha/2}$, with $B$ the Euler $\beta$ function, and a corresponding entropy obtained from the particle-counting rule. When the Lévy parameter takes its ordinary value $\alpha=2$, the standard AdS quantum-cosmology spectrum is recovered. The paper further claims that the fractal mass dimension of the dust is $D=3\alpha/2$, so the fractional parameter directly controls the spatial geometry of mass. A sympathetic reading is that this gives fractional quantum gravity a concrete connection between the nonlocal operator calculus and the observed fractal character of cosmic matter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fractional quantization map (35), which replaces the momentum $\Pi_x$ by a Riesz fractional derivative $D_x^\beta$ of order $\beta$, with $\alpha=\beta/2$ the Lévy parameter. The Riesz derivative is a nonlocal integral operator (39) that reduces to the ordinary second derivative at $\alpha=2$; its nonlocality is what encodes long-range, fractal behavior. Because no exact solution of the fractional WDW equation (47) is available, the paper evaluates this operator on a WKB wavefunction $\psi=e^{-iS}$, obtaining the semiclassical replacement $D^\alpha D^\alpha\psi \simeq |dS/dx|^\alpha \psi$ (Eq. 48), and then closes the argument with the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization condition (50).

What would settle it

Numerically solve the fractional WDW equation (47) on the half-line with the fractional Robin boundary condition (45) for several values of $\alpha\in(1,2)$ and compare the eigenvalues with Eq. (51). If the computed spectrum is not proportional to $(n+1/2)^{\alpha/2}$ with the predicted constant—or if it depends strongly on how the nonlocal integral is truncated—the semiclassical replacement fails and the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that Lévy's fractional parameter $\alpha$ is not just a bookkeeping device: it controls the mass spectrum, the entropy, and ultimately the spatial dimension of the dust. Starting from the ADM Hamiltonian for gravity coupled to Brown-Kuchař dust in flat AdS, quantizing with the fractional map and the Riesz fractional Laplacian, and applying the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule, the paper obtains the fractional mass spectrum (51). From that spectrum it derives the entropy (53) by the dust counting rule $S=N=M/m$, and rewrites the mass as a fractional volume times a fractional density times $a^{3\alpha/2}$, which forces the effective fractal dimension $D=3\alpha/2$. All formulas reduce to the standard $\alpha=2$ oscillator results, so the fractional model is presented as a genuine deformation of ordinary quantum cosmology.

Load-bearing premise

The mass spectrum and the exponent $\alpha/2$ rest on the semiclassical replacement Eq. (48), which evaluates the nonlocal Riesz fractional derivative on a WKB wavefunction as $|dS/dx|^\alpha$; the paper states that no exact solution of the fractional WDW equation is known, so if this replacement is wrong the spectrum in Eqs. (51)-(53) is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Setting $\alpha=2$ in Eqs. (52) and (53) returns exactly the standard AdS dust mass and entropy, so the fractional model is a continuous deformation rather than a replacement of ordinary quantum cosmology.
  • For $\alpha<2$ the mass levels grow like $(n+1/2)^{\alpha/2}$, compressing the high-$n$ part of the spectrum relative to the linearly spaced oscillator levels of the standard model.
  • The entropy formula (53) shows that fractional quantization changes the functional form of the count of dust particles, not just the energy scale, so the quantum-gravity footprint would appear in the thermodynamic spectrum of matter.
  • Equation (54) together with the fractional volume and fractional density assigns the dust an effective fractal dimension $D=3\alpha/2$, which is the paper's route from operator calculus to the geometry of cosmic mass.
  • The modified Friedmann equation (63) reduces to standard AdS cosmology at $\alpha=2$; for $\alpha<2$ the expansion rate becomes less scale-factor dependent, implying more gradual cosmological transitions and a possibly different structure-formation history.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct numerical solution of Eq. (47) for $\alpha\in(1,2)$ would test the semiclassical replacement (48); if the exact eigenvalues deviate from a pure $(n+1/2)^{\alpha/2}$ law, the mass ladder would need to be revised even if the $D=3\alpha/2$ relation survives as an effective statement.
  • If $D=3\alpha/2$ is taken literally, estimates of the correlation dimension of galaxy clustering—typically near 2 on large scales—would imply $\alpha\simeq4/3$, a value that predicts a compressed high-$n$ spectrum and a modified Friedmann expansion; this is a testable consequence the paper does not develop.
  • Applying the same fractional quantization map to de Sitter or to closed spatial sections should produce analogous fractional spectra; if the exponent $\alpha/2$ persists across curvatures, it may be a generic feature of fractional minisuperspace quantization rather than a special property of the flat-AdS oscillator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a fractional version of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for a flat FLRW universe with negative cosmological constant and Brown-Kuchař dust as the emergent time variable, using Laskin's fractional quantization map and the Riesz fractional derivative. In the semiclassical limit, the authors obtain a fractional mass spectrum (Eq. 51) and entropy (Eq. 53) that depend on the Lévy parameter α, and they claim a relation D = 3α/2 between the effective fractal dimension of the dust mass distribution and α. The intended α = 2 limit reproduces the ordinary oscillator spectrum and entropy.

Significance. The paper is a clear, well-structured application of the fractional-quantum-gravity framework to a cosmological minisuperspace model, and the use of Brown-Kuchař dust as a clock is a sensible way to extract a Schrödinger-like equation. If the semiclassical replacement (48) can be justified, the explicit formulas (51)-(53) provide a concrete, testable prediction for how fractional quantum gravity would modify the mass and entropy spectra of a dust-filled AdS universe. However, the main quantitative results are currently supported only by an unverified nonlocal-to-local approximation, and the D-α relation is partly definitional. The paper would be considerably strengthened by an independent numerical eigenvalue check of Eq. (47) and by a clearer statement of what is predicted versus what is assumed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (48)] The semiclassical replacement D_x^α D_x^α ψ(x) ≈ |dS/dx|^α ψ(x) is the only bridge from the nonlocal Riesz Laplacian to the mass spectrum (51). The derivation expands ψ(x±ν) to first order in ν and evaluates a sine integral, which assumes a linear phase over all ν ∈ (0,∞). That assumption is exact only for a plane wave; for the confining potential x^α on [0,∞), a WKB eigenfunction has turning points and evanescent regions where the approximation fails. No error bound or higher-order correction is provided, and the paper explicitly notes that no exact solution of Eq. (47) is known. Because the exponent α/2 in Eqs. (51)-(53) is inherited directly from |dS/dx|^α, a failure of Eq. (48) would invalidate the central claims. An independent check, such as a numerical eigenvalue computation of Eq. (47) for representative α, is needed before the results can be accepted.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (50)-(52)] The α = 2 limit does not recover the standard mass from Eq. (52): with B(1/2, 3/2) = π/2, Eq. (52) gives M_fractional = 3M, not M. Equation (51) does reduce to Eq. (31) at α = 2, but only if ω is taken as (3/2)M_Λ; the definition after Eq. (27), ω = √(3|Λ|)/4, is half of that value, so Eq. (31) is inconsistent with the stated ω. In addition, Eq. (50) states 2∫_0^{x0} Π_x dx = 2π(n+1/2), but for α = 2 and the correct turning point obtained by setting Π_x = 0 in Eq. (49), namely x0 = (8M/(9M_P M_Λ²))^{1/2}, this condition yields M = 3M_Λ(n+1/2), not the M = (3/2)M_Λ(n+1/2) quoted in Eq. (31). The displayed turning point x0 = (4M/(M_Λ^α M_P))^{1/α} is also inconsistent with Eq. (49). These factor errors must be corrected and the derivation made self-consistent.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (54)-(57)] The claimed relation D = 3α/2 is not an independent prediction. Equations (55) and (56) define the fractional volume and density precisely so that Eq. (54) scales as a^{3α/2}; this is an algebraic rewriting of Eq. (52) using M = V0 ρ a^3. No independent measurement or statistical estimate of the mass-distribution dimension is provided, and the comparison to Ref. [58] is only cited. The manuscript should either derive D from the fractional mass spectrum without inserting the scaling by hand, or explicitly state that D = 3α/2 is a definition of the effective dimension in this model rather than a falsifiable consequence.
  4. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (37)-(45)] The self-adjointness of the fractional Hamiltonian is not fully demonstrated. The boundary condition (45) involves D_x^α ψ, but no proof is given that H_gravity^(α) with this boundary condition is self-adjoint on a specified domain, nor is it shown that the fractional generalization of the Robin boundary condition selects the same γ-family as Eq. (26). Since the separation of variables and the interpretation of M as an eigenvalue rely on a well-defined self-adjoint operator, this gap should be addressed, or the semiclassical treatment should be explicitly labeled as formal.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (9)-(10)] The change of variables (10) and the volume factors in Eq. (9) should be checked for dimensional consistency; as written, the factor (V_k/(3π√G))^2 in Eq. (9) does not obviously match the substitution a = (3π√G/V_k)^{1/3} x^{2/3}.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (27)] Equation (27) is introduced as the general square-integrable solution after the statement that the model is flat (k = 0); please make explicit that Eq. (27) applies only in the k = 0 case, since the k ≠ 0 potential x^{2/3} is not a harmonic oscillator.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (35)-(38)] The notation D_x^β in the quantization map (35) is later replaced by D_x^α with α = β/2; the exponents in the potential terms of Eq. (38) (x^{2β/3} and x^{2β}) versus Eq. (47) (x^{α/3} and x^α) should be reconciled for readability.
  4. [Sec. 4, Eq. (48)] The approximate equality in Eq. (48) is written with an equals sign; it would be less misleading to denote the approximation explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mass and entropy spectrum follows from an explicitly assumed fractional quantization map and a stated WKB approximation; D=3α/2 is an algebraic consequence of the model, and the self-citations are corroborative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

A step-by-step check of the derivation chain shows no reduction of a predicted quantity to a fitted input or to a definition. Sections 2-3 derive the classical ADM Hamiltonian and the ordinary WDW equation self-containedly, yielding the oscillator spectrum (31) through boundary conditions and Hermite eigenfunctions. The fractional model in Section 4 begins with the explicitly stated fractional quantization map (35) and the Riesz derivative representation (39); the paper states 'we assume and implement' the map, so the α-dependence is a transparent model assumption rather than a smuggled ansatz. The only bridge to the spectrum is the semiclassical replacement (48), which is an approximation; the paper itself notes that 'currently, there is no overarching solution for equation (39) that explicitly includes a dependence on α'. This is a correctness or validation risk, not circularity: the WKB integral (50) is computed from the Hamiltonian (49), not matched to a target spectrum, and Eqs. (51)-(53) therefore carry the assumed α-scaling through the calculation without being fitted to it. The fractal-dimension claim (57) is obtained by rewriting (52) with definitions (55)-(56); the a^{3α/2} exponent follows algebraically from M_fractional ∝ M^{α/2} and the ordinary relation M = V_0 ρ a^3, so it is a derived implication of the model rather than an independent input. Reference [58], although by overlapping authors, is cited only for motivation and as agreement; Eq. (54) does not depend on it, so the citation is not load-bearing. Minor typos (e.g., the turning point in Eq. (50), factors in Eqs. (27) and (52)) and the unverified approximation (48) are the substantive concerns, but they are not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation leans on the fractional quantization map from the authors' prior work, on a semiclassical treatment of the Riesz derivative, and on the assumption S = N = M/m. The headline fractal dimension D = 3 alpha / 2 is installed through the definitions of fractional volume and density, not inferred from independent data.

free parameters (4)
  • Levy fractional parameter alpha = Not fitted; model input with 0 < alpha <= 2
    Central parameter of the Riesz fractional derivative; results like Eq (51) depend on alpha by construction, and the final D = 3 alpha / 2 is a function of alpha.
  • Generalized coefficient in the quantization map = M_Lambda = sqrt(|Lambda| / 3)
    Chosen by hand in Eq (36) to be the AdS energy scale; this choice fixes the coefficients of kinetic and potential terms in the fractional Hamiltonian.
  • Self-adjoint extension parameter gamma = Set to 0 or +/- infinity for the plotted spectrum; later declared superfluous
    Robin boundary condition constant introduced in Eq (26); the paper itself notes it becomes a new fundamental constant, then drops it in the semiclassical limit.
  • Dust particle mass m = Not specified
    Introduced to convert dust mass to particle number and entropy via S = N = M/m; all entropy formulas carry an undetermined 1/m.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The fractional quantization map (35) is the correct quantization rule for gravity in minisuperspace.
    Taken from prior work of the same authors (Refs [14,47]); no independent derivation is provided in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Riesz fractional derivative is Hermitian and self-adjoint on the half-line with boundary condition (45).
    Needed for Eq (42); relies on definitions from Pozrikidis [80] and Laskin [48].
  • domain assumption Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization applies to the fractional Hamiltonian.
    Used because no exact solution of Eq (47) is available; the paper assumes semiclassical quantization is valid for the nonlocal fractional operator.
  • domain assumption Entropy of dust equals number of particles, S = M/m.
    Taken from Ref [77]; necessary for all entropy formulas in the paper.
  • domain assumption The manifold M is spatially compact and has finite volume V_k.
    Used to normalize the spatial volume and curvature index; stated after Eq (2).
invented entities (2)
  • Fractal mass distribution dimension D = 3 alpha / 2
    purpose: Claims to describe the fractal dimension of the dust mass distribution.
    Obtained by rewriting Eq (52) as Eq (54) with definitions (55)-(56); no independent measurement or prediction outside the model.
  • Fractional volume V_0^(fractional) and fractional density rho^(fractional)
    purpose: Effective quantities introduced so the mass formula scales as a^(3 alpha / 2).
    Defined in Eqs (55)-(56) purely to match the fractional mass formula; they are not measured or derived from other physics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional entropy of the Brown-Kucha\v{r} dust in fractional anti-de Sitter quantum gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N3ZRZYIZ

@misc{pith2026250101244,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional entropy of the Brown-Kucha\vr dust in fractional anti-de Sitter quantum gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N3ZRZYIZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01244}
}
abstract

This study derives the mass spectrum and entropy of the Brown-Kucha\v{r} dust in anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime using the fractional Wheeler-DeWitt (WDW) equation. The generalized fractional WDW equation is formulated using a fractional quantization map, demonstrating a correlation between the fractal mass dimension of the Brown-Kucha\v{r} dust and L\'evy's fractional parameter $\alpha$ of the Riesz fractional quantum operator. These findings may provide new insights into the ramifications of the fractal behavior of cosmic structures in quantum cosmology and quantum gravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evolution of density perturbations in fractional cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the fractional model, matter density perturbations grow as t^{p±(α)} and matching the late-time growth to σ8 yields α≲1.07.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [58]

    Space Sci

    Moradpour H, Jalalzadeh S and Javaherian M 2024 Astrophys. Space Sci. 369 98 ( Preprint 2409.12869)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Jalalzadeh S and Vargas Moniz P 2022 Challenging Routes in Quantum Cosmology (World Scientific) ISBN 978-981-4415-06-4

    2022

  3. [2]

    Rovelli C 2004 Quantum gravity Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr.)

    2004

  4. [3]

    Oriti D 2009 Approaches to quantum gravity: Toward a new understanding o f space, time and matter (Cambridge University Press) ISBN 978-0-521-86045-1, 978-0- 511-51240-7

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    Jalalzadeh S 2022 Phys. Lett. B 829 137058 ( Preprint 2203.09968)

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Penrose R 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 57–59

    1965

  7. [6]

    Hawking S W and Penrose R 1970 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 314 529–548

    work page 1970

  8. [7]

    Hawking S W 1975 Commun. Math. Phys. 43 199–220 [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1976

Show all 82 references
  1. [8]

    Dark Univ

    Jalalzadeh S, Moradpour H and Moniz P V 2023 Phys. Dark Univ. 42 101320 ( Preprint 2308.12089)

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Dark Univ

    Jalalzadeh S, Mohammadi A and Demir D 2023 Phys. Dark Univ. 40 101227 ( Preprint 2210.02629)

    2023 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Jalalzadeh S 2022 Phys. Lett. B 833 137285 ( Preprint 2207.00727)

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Trugenberger C A 2024 Class. Quant. Gravity (Preprint 2409.09385)

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Chen D M and Wang L 2024 Universe 10 333 ( Preprint 2409.02954)

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Kruglov S I 2023 JHAP 3 53–58

    2023

  7. [14]

    Moniz P V and Jalalzadeh S 2020 Mathematics 8 313 ( Preprint 2003.01070)

    2020 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Brunetti R, Fredenhagen K and Rejzner K 2023 Locally Covariant Approach to Effective Quantum Gravity (Springer) pp 1–26 ( Preprint 2212.07800)

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kelly J G, Santacruz R and Wilson-Ewing E 2020 Phys. Rev. D 102 106024 (Preprint 2006.09302)

    2020 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Liu W, Wu D and Wang J 2024 Phys. Lett. B 858 139052 ( Preprint 2408.05569)

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Bojowald M 2012 Class. Quant. Grav. 29 213001 ( Preprint 1209.3403)

    2012 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Donoghue J F 2012 AIP Conf. Proc. 1483 73–94 ( Preprint 1209.3511)

    2012 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Dark Univ

    Bertini N R, Rodrigues D C and Shapiro I L 2024 Phys. Dark Univ. 45 101502 ( Preprint 2401.11559)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Battista E 2024 Phys. Rev. D 109 026004 ( Preprint 2312.00450)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    C 45 34 (Preprint 2111.14996)

    Giacchini B L, de Paula Netto T and Shapiro I L 2022 Nuovo Cim. C 45 34 (Preprint 2111.14996)

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Leon Torres G, Garc ´ ıa-Aspeitia M A, Fernandez-Anaya G, Her n´ andez-Almada A, Maga˜ na J and Gonz´ alez E 2023PoS CORFU2022 248 ( Preprint 2304.14465)

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    Shchigolev V K 2013 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 1350056 ( Preprint 1301.7198)

    2013 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Calcagni G 2013 JCAP 12 041 ( Preprint 1307.6382)

    2013 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Calcagni G 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 046001 ( Preprint 1705.01619)

    2017 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Shchigolev V K 2021 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36 2130014 ( Preprint 2104.12610)

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    7 368 ( Preprint 2303.16409)

    Gonz´ alez E, Leon G and Fernandez-Anaya G 2023 Fractal Fract. 7 368 ( Preprint 2303.16409)

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Socorro J and Rosales J J 2023 Universe 9 185 ( Preprint 2302.07799)

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    8 253 (Preprint 2402.13850)

    Marroqu ´ ın K, Leon G, Millano A D, Michea C and Paliathanasis A 2024 Fractal Fract. 8 253 (Preprint 2402.13850)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Benetti F, Lapi A, Gandolfi G and Liberati S 2024 Class. Quant. Grav. 41 175010 ( Preprint 2407.16787)

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Trivedi O, Bidlan A and Moniz P 2024 Phys. Lett. B 858 139074 ( Preprint 2407.16685) Fractional entropy of the Brown-Kuchaˇ r dust in fractionalanti-de Sitter quantum gravity16

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Var˜ ao G, Lobo I P and Bezerra V B 2024 EPL 148 30001 ( Preprint 2405.13544)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Jamil M, Momeni D and Rashid M A 2012 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 354 012008 ( Preprint 1106.2974)

    2012 arXiv

  28. [35]

    El-Nabulsi R A 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 1159–1182

    2017

  29. [36]

    El-Nabulsi R A 2013 Can. J. Phys. 91 618–622

    2013

  30. [37]

    Rasouli S M M, Costa E W O, Moniz P V and Jalalzadeh S 2022 Fractal and Fractional 6 ISSN 2504-3110 ( Preprint 2210.00909) URL https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3110/6/11/655

    2022 arXiv

  31. [38]

    El-Nabulsi A R 2013 Indian J. Phys. 87 835–840

    2013

  32. [39]

    El-Nabulsi R A 2016 Rev. Mex. Fis. 62 240

    2016

  33. [40]

    El-Nabulsi R A 2017 Can. J. Phys. 95 605–609

    2017

  34. [41]

    Rami E N A 2015 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130 102

    2015

  35. [42]

    El-Nabulsi R A 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 68 309

    2017

  36. [43]

    Landim R G 2021 Phys. Rev. D 103 083511 ( Preprint 2101.05072)

    2021 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Landim R G 2021 Phys. Rev. D 104 103508 ( Preprint 2106.15415)

    2021 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Varieschi G U 2020 Found. Phys. 50 1608–1644 [Erratum: Found.Phys. 51, 41 (2021)] ( Preprint 2003.05784)

    2021 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Giusti A 2020 Phys. Rev. D 101 124029 ( Preprint 2002.07133)

    2020 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Rasouli S M M, Jalalzadeh S and Moniz P V 2021 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36 2140005 ( Preprint 2101.03065)

    2021 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Laskin N 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 056108 ( Preprint quant-ph/0206098)

    2002 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Metzler R and Klafter J 2000 Physics Reports 339(1) 1–77

    2000

  43. [50]

    Rocco A and West B J 1999 Physica A 265(3-4) 535–546

    1999

  44. [51]

    Butera S and Di Paola M 2014 Annals of Physics 350 146–158

    2014

  45. [52]

    Tatom F B 1995 Fractals 3 217–229

    1995

  46. [53]

    Jalalzadeh S, da Silva F R and Moniz P V 2021 Eur. Phys. J. C 81 632 ( Preprint 2107.04789)

    2021 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Jalalzadeh S, Costa E W O and Moniz P V 2022 Phys. Rev. D 105 L121901 (Preprint 2206.07818)

    2022 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Junior P F d S, Costa E W d O and Jalalzadeh S 2023 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138 862 ( Preprint 2309.12478)

    2023 arXiv

  49. [56]

    7 854 ( Preprint 2310.09464)

    de Oliveira Costa E W, Jalalzadeh R, da Silva Junior P F, Rasouli S M M a nd Jalalzadeh S 2023 Fractal Fract. 7 854 ( Preprint 2310.09464)

    2023 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Dark Univ

    Jalalzadeh R, Jalalzadeh S, Jahromi A S and Moradpour H 2024 Phys. Dark Univ. 44 101498 (Preprint 2404.06986)

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Brown J D and Kuchar K V 1995 Phys. Rev. D 51 5600–5629 ( Preprint gr-qc/9409001)

    1995 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Witten E 1998 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 505–532 ( Preprint hep-th/9803131)

    1998 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Dong X, Harlow D and Wall A C 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 021601 ( Preprint 1601.05416)

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    D’Hoker E and Freedman D Z 2002 Supersymmetric gauge theorie s and the AdS / CFT correspondence Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Partic le Physics (TASI 2001): Strings, Branes and EXTRA Dimensions pp 3–158 ( Preprint hep-th/0201253)

    2002 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Ryu S and Takayanagi T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 181602 ( Preprint hep-th/0603001)

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Almheiri A and Polchinski J 2015 JHEP 11 014 ( Preprint 1402.6334)

    2015 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Faulkner T, Guica M, Hartman T, Myers R C and Van Raamsdonk M 2 014 JHEP 03 051 (Preprint 1312.7856)

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Harlow D and Ooguri H 2021 Commun. Math. Phys. 383 1669–1804 ( Preprint 1810.05338)

    2021 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Strominger A 1999 JHEP 01 007 ( Preprint hep-th/9809027)

    1999 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Maldacena J M 1998 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 231–252 ( Preprint hep-th/9711200)

    1998 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Basteiro P, Elfert J, Erdmenger J and Hinrichsen H 2022 J. Phys. A 55 364002 ( Preprint 2201.10870)

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Skvortsov E D and Tran T 2017 Universe 3 61 ( Preprint 1707.00758)

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Jalalzadeh S and Vargas Moniz P 2022 Challenging Routes in Quantum Cosmology (World Scientific) ISBN 978-981-4415-06-4 Fractional entropy of the Brown-Kuchaˇ r dust in fractionalanti-de Sitter quantum gravity17

    2022

  64. [72]

    Arnowitt R L, Deser S and Misner C W 2008 Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 1997–2027 ( Preprint gr-qc/0405109)

    2008 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Maeda H 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 235023 ( Preprint 1502.06954)

    2015 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Tipler F J 1986 Phys. Rep. 137 231–275

    1986

  67. [75]

    Jalalzadeh S, Moradpour H and Tebyanian H 2024 Class. Quant. Grav. 41 165006 ( Preprint 2405.12314)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Dark Univ

    Jalalzadeh S, Capistrano A J S and Moniz P V 2017 Phys. Dark Univ. 18 55–66 ( Preprint 1709.09923)

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Rashki M and Jalalzadeh S 2015 Phys. Rev. D 91 023501 ( Preprint 1412.3950)

    2015 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Ortiz C, Socorro J, Tkach V I, Torres J and Rosales J 2005 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 24 167–172

    2005

  71. [79]

    Herrmann R 2007 J. Phys. G 34 607–626 ( Preprint nucl-th/0610091)

    2007 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Pozrikidis C 2018 The Fractional Laplacian (Chapman and Hall/CRC)

    2018

  73. [81]

    Gaite J 2019 Adv. Astron. 2019 6587138 ( Preprint 1810.02311)

    2019 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Gaite J 2018 JCAP 07 010 ( Preprint 1803.07419)

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.