REVIEW 3 cited by
Superposition of causal order as a metrological resource for quantum thermometry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose a novel approach to qubit thermometry using a quantum switch, that introduces an indefinite causal order in the probe-bath interaction, to significantly enhance the thermometric precision. The resulting qubit probe shows improved precision in both low and high temperature regimes when compared to optimal qubit probes studied previously. It even performs better than a Harmonic oscillator probe, in spite of having only two energy levels rather than an infinite number of energy levels as that in a harmonic oscillator. We thereby show unambiguously that quantum resources such as the quantum switch can significantly improve equilibrium thermometry. We also derive a new form of thermodynamic uncertainty relation that is tighter and depends on the energy gap of the probe. The present work may pave the way for using indefinite causal order as a metrological resource.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quantum coherence leveraged agnostic phase estimation
A coherently controlled superposition of a unitary and its inverse on a probe qubit gives optimal, axis-agnostic phase estimation with Fisher information 1.
-
$100\pm\Delta t$ Years of Quantum Uncertainty: From Origins to Modern Insights
A historical and conceptual review of uncertainty relations, their mathematical forms, interconnections, and applications in quantum metrology, dedicated to the principle's centenary.
-
A map of indefinite causal order
A conceptual map of indefinite causal order covering the quantum switch, process matrices, superposition of causal structures, and four open debates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.